Next Article in Journal
Pressure Algometry for the Detection of Mechanical Nociceptive Thresholds in Horses
Next Article in Special Issue
Transcriptome Sequencing and Comparative Analysis of Amphoteric ESCs and PGCs in Chicken (Gallus gallus)
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Phlorotannins from Brown Seaweeds on the In Vitro Digestibility of Pig Feed
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Mediation of miR-34a/miR-449c for Immune Cytokines in Acute Cold/Heat-Stressed Broiler Chicken
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/ani10122194
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Diversity and Population Substructure of Sarda Breed Bucks by Using Mtdna and Y-Chromosome Markers

by
Maria Luisa Dettori
1,*,
Elena Petretto
1,
Michele Pazzola
1,
Oriol Vidal
2,
Marcel Amills
3,4 and
Giuseppe Massimo Vacca
1
1
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, via Vienna 2, 07100 Sassari, Italy
2
Departament de Biologia, Universitat de Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain
3
Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Department of Animal Genetics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
4
Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(12), 2194; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122194
Submission received: 3 November 2020 / Revised: 21 November 2020 / Accepted: 22 November 2020 / Published: 24 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Genetic Diversity in Livestock and Companion Animals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Domestic goats show extraordinary adaptation to different environments. Sardinia (Italy), the second-largest island in the Mediterranean Sea, is the birthplace of Sarda goats which are raised to produce milk mainly devoted to cheesemaking. The aim of this research was to characterize genetic diversity of Sarda bucks, reared in eight subregions of the island, to gain information about the relationship between genetic variation and geography as well as to investigate the existence of population substructure. We performed genotyping of Y-chromosome markers, which trace the patrilineal diversity, and sequencing of a portion of mitochondrial DNA, which gives information about matrilineal diversity. Analysis of Y-chromosome markers revealed the occurrence of high levels of diversity in populations from Southwest Sardinia. Further analysis of both Y-chromosome and mitochondrial DNA data evidenced the lack of population substructure. These results suggest the occurrence of extensive gene flow between the different subregions of Sardinia. The introduction of goats from other geographical locations, outside Sardinia, and belonging to highly productive breeds probably contributed to enhance genetic variation.

Abstract

A sample of 146 Sarda bucks from eight subregions of Sardinia, Italy (Nuorese, Barbagia, Baronia, Ogliastra, Sarrabus, Guspinese, Iglesiente, Sulcis) were characterized for Y-chromosome and mtDNA markers to assess the levels of population substructure. Five polymorphic loci (SRY, AMELY, ZFY, and DDX3Y) on the Y-chromosome were genotyped. The control region of mtDNA was sequenced as a source of complementary information. Analysis of Y-chromosome data revealed the segregation of 5 haplotypes: Y1A (66.43%), Y2 (28.57%), Y1C (3.57%), Y1B1 (0.71%), and Y1B2 (0.71%). High levels of Y-chromosome diversity were observed in populations from Southwest Sardinia. The FST values based on Y-chromosome and mtDNA data were low, although a paternal genetic differentiation was observed when comparing the Nuorese and Barbagia populations (Central Sardinia) with the Sulcis, Iglesiente, and Sarrabus populations (Southern Sardinia). AMOVA analysis supported the lack of population substructure. These results suggest the occurrence of a historical and extensive gene flow between Sarda goat populations from different locations of Sardinia, despite the fact that this island is covered by several large mountain ranges. Introgression with foreign caprine breeds in order to improve milk production might have also contributed to avoiding the genetic differentiation amongst Sarda populations.

1. Introduction

Domestic goats (Capra hircus) are characterized by their extraordinary adaptation to different climates and environments. It is estimated that there are over a thousand goat breeds worldwide, with 579 local breeds officially reported by 182 countries from all over the world [1]. Most of these local breeds are reared under traditional low input extensive systems, particularly in developing countries [2]. In several regions of the Mediterranean basin, including Italy, dairy goat farming is practiced mainly in these traditional conditions. In Sardinia, an island off the west coast of Italy, dairy goat farming mainly takes place in the mountains and high hills of the Centre (Nuorese, Barbagia), East (Baronia, Ogliastra, Sarrabus), and South-West (Guspinese, Iglesiente, Sulcis) subregions of the island [3,4]. The autochthonous Sarda breed has a census of 260,000 heads, but only 6500 goats are registered in the herdbook [4,5]. Archaeological evidence suggests that domestic goats were present in Sardinia since the Neolithic age [6]. The main features of the Sarda goat breed, which is mainly devoted to cheese making [7], are a marked hardiness and striking morphologic (Figure S1) [4] and genetic [8,9,10] variability. In the recent past, Sarda goat keepers made unplanned crossings with exotic breeds (mainly Maltese), as a strategy to improve milk production [3,4]. This practice is considered detrimental for the conservation of the Sarda breed because uncontrolled admixture could lead to the dilution and erosion of its gene pool. In this regard, the FAO Committee on Genetic Resources in Agriculture [1] encourages a sustainable use of animal genetic resources in order to ensure that locally adapted breeds persist as functional components of production systems. One of the milestones to be achieved in order to safeguard the Sarda breed is to generate and gather information about its genetic variability.
The paternal history of breeds can be investigated with Y-chromosome markers, which have a male-limited transmission and do not recombine [11,12]. The diversity of the Y-chromosome has been reported for several goat breeds [13,14,15,16], demonstrating that the segregation of paternal markers is strongly associated with the continental origin of breeds. Other studies have used information enclosed in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to trace the matrilineal history of livestock species. In goats, research on mtDNA variability made it possible to detect a weak population structure that could be caused by both extensive gene flow and recent divergence [17,18,19,20]. Based on the analysis of the mtDNA hypervariable region of domestic goats, 6 highly divergent haplogroups (Hg) were described: A, B, C [17], D, F and G [18,21,22]. These Hg were already present 460,000 years ago in the wild ancestor of goats, the bezoar (Capra aegagrus), and their frequencies and geographic distribution reflect a population expansion event during the Neolithic transition that favored the worldwide spread of Hg A and, to a lower extent, of Hg C [23].
With regard to the Sarda goat breed, the diversity of the Y-chromosome was investigated in 190 bucks and it became evident that a Central European haplotype is particularly frequent, but the existence of population structure was not assessed [24]. Vidal et al. [16] also studied the Y-chromosome variation of Sarda bucks and demonstrated that Y1A is the most frequent haplotype followed by Y2. Three additional studies were conducted to characterize the variability of the mtDNA hypervariable region I (HVR-I) variability, but only in the female population [5,6,25]. In Sarda goats, the most frequent mtDNA haplogroup (Hg) is Hg A, but Hg C is also present [5,6]. In the context of the phylogenetic reconstruction carried out by Piras et al. [6], Hg A appears to be divided into 11 clades, and clade A11 is assumed to represent an ancient phylogenetic line. This line would be peculiar and exclusive of Sardinia, as later confirmed by Doro et al. [25].
The purpose of this research was to assess the patrilineal and matrilineal genetic diversity of a representative sample of Sarda bucks from different locations in order to find out whether variation patterns are associated with geography, a feature that was not assessed in previous studies. Moreover, we aimed to integrate both sources of information to investigate the existence of population substructure in the Sarda breed. Indeed, the bucks investigated in our study belong to the main subregions of Sardinia where the Sarda breed is reared, making it possible to determine whether mtDNA and Y-chromosome markers segregate differently depending on the geographic provenance of bucks. Population substructure can be produced by a broad array of causal factors including both neutral (genetic drift, founder effects, gene flow, etc.) and selective forces, so such information could provide valuable clues about the origin and history of the Sarda goat breed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Approval

For the present research, no specific authorization by an animal ethics committee was required. Blood samples were collected by private and official veterinarians of the local health authorities (ASSL) in the contest of sanitary programs, not linked with the present study.

2.2. Sampling and DNA Purification

A total of 146 bucks from 39 farms belonging to different subregions of Sardinia i.e., Nuorese (n = 12), Barbagia (n = 10), Baronia (n = 10), Ogliastra (n = 42), Sarrabus (n = 7), Guspinese (n = 10), Iglesiente (n = 15), Sulcis (n = 40), were sampled for this research. Sarda goats from these subregions differ in terms of farming methods and also for morphological and productive traits as a result of adaptation to different environmental conditions [3,4]. A general description of the sampled farms can be found in [5,26,27]. In each farm, one to five adult males were randomly chosen and blood samples were taken in K3EDTA vacuum tubes (BD Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson, Milan, Italy S.p.A.). Genomic DNA was isolated with the Gentra Puregene Blood Kit (Qiagen) and DNA purity and concentration were measured with an Eppendorf BioPhotometer instrument (Eppendorf).

2.3. Y-Chromosome Genotyping

Seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in the non-recombining region of the goat Y-chromosome were genotyped according to [16], i.e., SRY-2971 T > A, SRY-3098 G > A, SRY-1876 A > C (at the sex determining region Y gene), AMELY-42 C > T (amelogenin, Y-Linked, GenBank AY082491) and ZFY-527 A > G (zinc finger protein, Y-Linked, GenBank AY082500). These markers have been reported in previous studies [14,15,28,29], while markers DDX3Y g.56 C > G (DEAD-box helicase 3, Y-linked) and ZFY g.46 C > T were described for the first time by Vidal et al. [16]. A custom TaqMan Real-Time PCR assay was designed and genotypic data were generated on a 12K Flex QuantStudio instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at the Servei Veterinari de Genetica Molecular from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona [30]. Genotypes were visualized with the Taqman Genotyper v.1.3 software (Applied Biosystems) and SNPs with call rates < 0.9 were removed from the dataset.

2.4. Mitochondrial DNA Analysis

The control region of the mtDNA was amplified with the primer pair MT1F: 5′-AGCCATAGCCTCACTATCAGC-3′ and MT1R: 5′-TCATCTAGGCATTTTCAGTG-3′ [31] to yield a fragment of 1316 bp (including the complete control region of mitochondrial DNA) by using PCR conditions described by [31]. Amplified products were purified with ExoSAP (Applied Biosystems): 10.7 µL amplified product were mixed with 4.3 µL of ExoSAP reagent and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min on a thermal cycler. Subsequently, ExoSap was inactivated at 80°C for 15 min and the purified amplified product was used as a template to carry out sequencing reactions with the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). Sequencing reactions were run on an ABI PRISM 3730 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems). In cases where a full length sequence was not obtained, we used the primer pairs MTAF: 5′-CGCTCGCCTACACACAAATA-3′ and MTAR: 5′-AATGCCCATGCCTACCATTA-3′ [32] to generate the missing sequence data. For mtDNA sequences, the software Phred/Phrap/Crossmatch were used to compute data quality information from chromatogram files [33,34]. PolyPhred was used to compare sequence traces and search for polymorphisms within the aligned sequences [35,36]. Then, Consed was used to view polymorphism tags by navigating through the sequence traces in order to visually check all chromatogram peaks [37,38,39].

2.5. Statistical and Computational Analysis

The software MEGA version 7.0 [40] was used to align mtDNA sequences. Indel and missing data were removed from the alignment before any analysis was performed. The DnaSP v.5.10.01 software [41] was used to calculate nucleotide and haplotype diversities and the FST values according to [42]. The software Network v.10 [43] was employed to build Median-Joining (MJ) networks based on Y-chromosome and mtDNA data. Polymorphic sites were weighted inversely to the number of mutational events needed to solve the network, as in [31]. Transversions and transitions were given weights of 3 and 1, respectively. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was carried out with the Arlequin 3.5 software [44] with default parameters. The POPART v.1.7 software [45] was used to display Y-chromosome haplotype frequencies for each of the geographical locations where samples were collected. A Neighbour Joining (NJ) tree based on FST values (for Y-chromosome data) was built with the MEGA 7.0 software.

3. Results

3.1. Y-Chromosome Markers

Of all animals tested for Y-chromosome markers, 140 bucks from 38 farms were correctly genotyped. Out of the 7 SNPs under study, one was monomorphic: AMELY-42 C > T (GenBank AY082491). The remaining SNPs defined five haplotypes (Table 1). Haplotype frequency and diversity in each subregion are described in Table 2. The value of overall haplotype diversity was 0.479. At the subregional scale, the Sarrabus population was highly diverse despite its low sample size, with an Hd value (0.571) higher than those observed in the Sulcis (0.529) and Ogliastra (0.504) populations, which are represented by more individuals. Nuorese (Hd = 0.166), Barbagia (Hd = 0.200), and Baronia (Hd = 0.250) populations displayed the lowest Hd values, and Iglesiente (0.670) was the most diverse Sarda population.
The estimates obtained for FST coefficients are described in Table 3. The FST values among populations ranged between 0.00 and 0.16. Most populations displayed little genetic differentiation (FST < 0.05), with a few exceptions, e.g., Barbagia and Nuorese vs. Sulcis (FST 0.12 and 0.14, respectively), Sarrabus (FST 0.13 and 0.16, respectively) and Ogliastra (FST 0.13 and 0.16, respectively).
Performance of an AMOVA analysis demonstrated that the between-populations component of variation is very small (2.47%) and that population structure was not significant (Table 4).
The NJ tree based on FST data (Figure 1) showed that three populations (Nuorese, Barbagia, and Baronia) are differentiated from the remaining ones.
The MJ network based on Y-chromosome haplotypes (Figure 2) contained two Y1A and Y2 clades with contributions from all eight Sarda populations. In addition, haplotype Y1C was harboured by individuals from Iglesiente and Sulcis, while haplotypes Y1B1 and Y1B2 only segregated in Sulcis and Ogliastra individuals, respectively.
Haplotype clustering based on the geographical coordinates of sampled locations are depicted in Figure 3. It can be observed that the three populations from Nuorese, Barbagia, and Baronia differed from the remaining ones with regard to the frequency of haplotype Y1A.

3.2. Mitochondrial DNA Analysis

Sequencing of the hypervariable region of mtDNA was achieved for 146 bucks. Taking as a reference sequence NC_005044.2 [46], most of the samples were sequenced from nucleotide (nt) 15437 to nt 16600. All non-redundant sequences were submitted to GenBank (Accession Numbers MN786532-MN786639). For the downstream analyses, two sequences were excluded from the dataset (MN786581 and MN786585) because they contained 76 and 77 bp insertions, respectively. The overall alignment of 925 bp highlighted the existence of 120 variable sites and 94 haplotypes. Moreover, haplotype diversity was 0.992 (Table 5). The highest haplotype diversity value was observed in the Barbagia population, with 10 different haplotypes out of 10 sampled animals (Hd = 1).
A MJ network including 144 mtDNA sequences from Sarda bucks (from nt 15437 to nt 16361 of NC_005044.2) is shown in Figure 4. The outgroup is represented by a mitochondrial sequence from a Capra aegagrus (KR059221) individual carrying haplogroup C.
According to the phylogenetic reconstruction carried out by [6], Sarda goat haplotypes are distributed over 11 Hg A clades. In order to understand which clades our sequences belong to, we combined our dataset with that of [6] and we performed a haplotype analysis using the DnaSP software v.5.10.01 [41]. As shown in Table S1, clades A4 (23), A11 (19), and A2 (18) comprised of the highest proportion of Sarda buck haplotypes. No haplotype fell into clade A9, while 26 haplotypes did not match any haplotype of the Sarda goat dataset reported by [6]. The MJ network based on mtDNA data showed some haplotype clusters that were indistinctly contributed by the eight populations, thus indicating the absence of genetic differentiation between populations. Some haplotype clusters were attributable to clades A2, A4, A6, A7, A8, and A11 previously identified in Sarda goats [6]. The two haplotypes belonging to Hg C were present in Barbagia and Nuorese bucks.
A second MJ network including all mtDNA sequences from Sarda bucks plus European, Asian, and African caprine mtDNA sequences retrieved from the public databases and representing known haplogroups (File S1) was also built (Figure 5). In the resulting MJ network, the Sarda buck haplotypes were distributed over the entire Hg A cluster. It was possible to detect several haplotypes matching the clades defined by [6]. Clade A11 was clearly separated from the remaining Hg A sequences, including one haplotype of African origin. Clades A6 and A2 also showed genetic differentiation, and included, in addition to the Sarda buck haplotypes, haplotypes of goats from Middle Europe, Mediterranean Europe (clade A2) and Middle East (clade A6). Clades A8 and A4 were also recognizable within Hg A.
The measurement of FST values amongst populations based on mtDNA haplotypes yielded negative or near zero values, indicating the absence of population substructure The AMOVA analysis confirmed the absence of population substructure (Table 6).

4. Discussion

4.1. Patterns of Y-Chromosome and Mitochondrial Diversity in Sarda Bucks

Analysis of Y-chromosome variation at SRY, AMELY, ZFY, and DDX3Y genes in 140 Sarda breed bucks revealed the segregation of all the haplotypes identified so far in Europe, Africa, and the Near East [16]. Sechi et al. [24] analyzed eight SNPs in the Y-chromosome of Sardinian bucks, demonstrating that paternal genetic diversity is high. Vidal et al. [16] also investigated Y-chromosome variation in the Sarda breed bucks and showed that the frequencies of the Y1A, Y1B2, and Y2 haplotypes were approximately 72%, 5%, and 23%. However, the experimental design of the two studies mentioned before hindered the performance of analyses of genetic diversity at the regional scale or population substructure at the within-breed level.
In the present investigation, we have been able to compare the genetic variation of Sarda bucks from different geographic areas. Indeed, we have observed very different values of Hd among the eight populations under consideration. With regard to Y-chromosome variation, the higher haplotype diversity was found in populations from the South-West (Iglesiente, Sulcis, Guspinese) and in Sarrabus and Ogliastra. The MJ network (Figure 1) showed that the two main haplotypes were Y1A and Y2, and these two haplotypes segregated in all populations under analysis. In contrast, the Y1B1, Y1B2, and Y1C haplotypes had low frequencies and were detected only in Ogliastra (Y1B2), Sulcis (Y1B1 and Y1C), and Iglesiente (Y1C). Ogliastra and Sulcis populations are represented by the largest number of sampled animals, so the presence of multiple haplotypes could be expected to some extent. However, the Iglesiente population was only represented by 14 bucks and, despite this, it displayed the highest haplotypic diversity observed in our data set (Hd = 0.67).
These observations are consistent with the fact that farmers from the Southwestern region of Sardinia have often imported bucks from exotic breeds in order to improve milk production [47]. Indeed, haplotypes Y1B2, Y1B1, and Y1C are particularly frequent in Swiss breeds [16]. In contrast, goat farmers from Nuorese and Barbagia (but also Baronia and Ogliastra) have tended to preserve goat herds from the introgression of foreign breeds, a course of action that is probably explained by the orographic, cultural, and historical particularities of this territory [48]. Possibly, the introgression of Sarda goats with exotic breeds had a different impact on the paternal and maternal gene pools, because the analysis of mtDNA data showed patterns that are very different from those inferred from Y-chromosome data. Indeed, the Sulcis population was the one with the lowest nucleotide diversity and Hd values, while these two parameters reached high values in the case of the Nuorese and Barbagia populations. Differential rates of foreign introgression for females and males might explain the discrepancy observed between mtDNA and Y-chromosome data, but this should be further tested with autosomal markers in order to reach a valid conclusion.
The analysis of mtDNA data also highlighted that the majority of Sarda mtDNA haplotypes belong to the A haplogroup, which is strongly predominant in all goat breeds. Interestingly, HgC, which has scattered distribution throughout Europe, was also present in Sarda bucks. This haplogroup is supposed to derive from a second wave of domestication, more recent than Hg A [6]. Noteworthy, 13.2% of the bucks analyzed belonged to HgA clade A11, which is considered to be specific to Sardinia. This clade could be traced back to an ancient line the origins of which have not been defined yet, so its segregation cannot be attributed to the importation of goats from Europe [25].

4.2. Lack of Population Substructure in the Sarda Breed

In general, the FST values measured on the basis of Y-chromosome data were quite low (FST < 0.05), but two populations (Barbagia and Nuorese) displayed an increased level of differentiation with regard to buck populations from Sarrabus, Sulcis, and Ogliastra. These differences can be better visualized by examining the geographic distribution of Y-chromosome haplotypes in Sarda bucks (Figure 3). Importantly, the AMOVA analysis reported in Table 4 made evident the absence of a significant paternal population substructure (p-value = 0.18) in the Sarda breed. Data obtained from the mtDNA sequences from 144 Sarda bucks confirmed these findings (Figure 4), which were further supported by the fact that all FST coefficients amongst populations were close to zero. This lack of population substructure suggests the occurrence of extensive gene flow between goat populations from different geographic areas of Sardinia. In this island, it is common for sheep farmers to practice inverse transhumance in which permanent settlements are established in the mountains and flocks travel down to the lowlands for winter [49]. This practice is not common for goat herds reared with traditional extensive methods, which are allowed to graze very large and uncontrolled territories, up to thousand hectares, rented by farmers from the municipalities [7]. In summary, the high mobility of Sarda goats might have facilitated the occurrence of genetic exchanges between herds from different locations of Sardinia. It is important to emphasize, however, that the analysis of autosomal genome-wide SNP markers might allow to discern levels of population substructure, in the Sarda breed, that are not detectable with mitochondrial and Y-chromosome markers. Indeed, the genotyping of caprine populations with the Goat SNP50 BeadChip has made possible to dissect population structure and genetic differentiation much more efficiently than the analysis of mitochondrial sequences [17,50]. Thus, we cannot rule out the possibility that the mitochondrial and Y-chromosome markers used in the current work do not have enough resolution to capture fine levels of population structure in the Sarda breed.
The occurrence of multiple imports of animals along different historical periods since the Neolithic age might have also contributed to weakening of genetic differences between different Sarda populations. Cardoso et al. [51] analysed the patterns of homozygosity in continental and insular goat populations and concluded that insular populations from Madagascar and Iceland and La Palma showed increased levels of homozygosity when compared to nearby continental populations, while such observation was not true for Sarda goats. Throughout history, Sardinia has been an important port-of-call of maritime routes that were navigated by Phoenicians, Carthaginians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs, and many other seafaring civilizations [52]. This circumstance probably enhanced the frequent admixture of caprine populations with different gene pools. Furthermore, a recent mixed ancestry, with a major influence of Maltese goats, has been revealed for the Sarda breed [53].

5. Conclusions

We have examined the variation of Y-chromosome and mtDNA markers in bucks from different geographic areas of Sardinia. Our results indicate the absence of population substructure, with very low FST values amongst populations and non-significant results in the AMOVA analysis for both paternal and maternal markers. These results are compatible with the occurrence of an extensive gene flow between goat populations raised in different locations from Sardinia, despite the fact that this island has a rugged landscape and is covered by large mountain ranges. Moreover, the practice of introducing allochthonous breeds to increase milk production of Sarda goats might have contributed to weaken genetic differentiation amongst populations. We have also observed a higher Y-chromosome haplotype diversity in bucks from Southwestern Sardinia, but such pattern was not detected when analyzing mtDNA markers. This result highlights that the paternal and maternal histories of the Sarda breed are not fully concordant, but the causes of these differences remain to be fully elucidated. From a conservation perspective, our study indicates that the Sarda breed, in contrast with other local populations from Southern Europe [31], has not suffered a strong reduction of its genetic diversity, probably because of the existence of a substantial gene flow amongst different populations distributed across Sardinia. Of more concern would be the potential introgression of Sarda goats with foreign breeds, a feature that could dilute the gene pool of the Sarda breed and decrease its adaptation to current breeding conditions in Sardinia. In this regard, it would be critical to make sure that uncontrolled crossbreeding between Sarda goats and exotic breeds does not take place since this is essential to preserve this unique genetic resource.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/12/2194/s1, Figure S1: Bucks and goats of Sarda breed, File S1: List of mtDNA Sequences. Table S1: Distribution of the bucks mtDNA haplotypes in the 11 clades representing haplogroup A.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M.V. and M.L.D.; methodology, M.L.D., M.A. and O.V.; formal analysis, M.L.D. and E.P.; investigation, E.P. and M.L.D.; resources, G.M.V. and M.P.; data curation, M.L.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.L.D. and G.M.V.; writing—review and editing, M.A. and O.V.; funding acquisition, G.M.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Regional Government of Sardinia (Progetto Strategico Sulcis; CUP J73C17000070007, Cagliari, Italy).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the farmers for giving access to their flocks.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agricolture. Report of a Consultation on the Definition of Breed Categories. In Proceedings of the Item 5 of the Provisional Agenda, Seventh Session, Rome, Italy, 24–26 October 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. Marshall, K. Optimizing the use of breed types in developing country livestock production systems: A neglected research area. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2014, 131, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Usai, M.G.; Casu, S.; Molle, G.; Decandia, M.; Ligios, S.; Carta, A. Using cluster analysis to characterize the goat farming system in Sardinia. Livest. Sci. 2006, 104, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vacca, G.M.; Paschino, P.; Dettori, M.L.; Bergamaschi, M.; Cipolat-Gotet, C.; Bittante, G.; Pazzola, M. Environmental, morphological, and productive characterization of Sardinian goats and use of latent explanatory factors for population analysis. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 3947–3957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vacca, G.M.; Daga, C.; Pazzola, M.; Carcangiu, V.; Dettori, M.L.; Cozzi, M.C. D-loop sequence mitochondrial DNA variability of Sarda goat and other goat breeds and populations reared in the Mediterranean area. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2010, 127, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Piras, D.; Doro, M.G.; Casu, G.; Melis, M.P.; Vaccargiu, S.; Piras, I.; Debora, P.; Stradoni, R.; Frongia, B.; Lai, G.; et al. Haplotype affinities resolve a major component of goat (Capra hircus) mtDNA D-loop diversity and reveal specific features of the Sardinian stock. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pazzola, M.; Dettori, M.L.; Vacca, G.M. The Sarda goat, a resource for the extensive exploitation in the Mediterranean environment. In Sustainable Goat Production in Adverse Environments; Simoes, J., Gutierrez, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 2, pp. 181–190. [Google Scholar]
  8. Vacca, G.M.; Pazzola, M.; Pisano, C.; Carcangiu, V.; Diaz, M.L.; Nieddu, M.; Robledo, R.; Mezzanotte, R.; Dettori, M.L. Chromosomal localisation and genetic variation of the SLC11A1 gene in goats (Capra hircus). Vet. J. 2011, 190, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vacca, G.M.; Dettori, M.L.; Piras, G.; Manca, F.; Paschino, P.; Pazzola, M. Goat casein genotypes are associated with milk production traits in the Sarda breed. Anim. Genet. 2014, 45, 723–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Usai, M.; Casu, S.; Sechi, T.; Salaris, S.; Miari, S.; Sechi, S.; Carta, P.; Carta, A. Mapping genomic regions affecting milk traits in Sarda sheep by using the OvineSNP50 Beadchip and principal components to perform combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis. GSE 2019, 51, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bruford, M.W.; Bradley, D.G.; Luikart, G. DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4, 900–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Butler, J.M. Y-Chromosome DNA Testing. In Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pidancier, N.; Jordan, S.; Luikart, G.; Taberlet, P. Evolutionary history of the genus Capra (Mammalia, Artiodactyla): Discordance between mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome phylogenies. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 40, 739–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cinar Kul, B.; Bilgen, N.; Lenstra, J.A.; Korkmaz Agaoglu, O.; Akyuz, B.; Ertugrul, O.K. Y-chromosomal variation of local goat breeds of Turkey close to the domestication centre. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2015, 132, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Waki, A.; Sasazaki, S.; Kobayashi, E.; Mannen, H. Paternal phylogeography and genetic diversity of East Asian goats. Anim. Genet. 2015, 46, 337–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vidal, O.; Drögemüller, C.; Obexer-Ruff, G.; Reber, I.; Jordana, J.; Martínez, A.; Bâlteanu, V.A.; Delgado, J.V.; Eghbalsaied, S.; Landi, V.; et al. Differential distribution of Y-chromosome haplotypes in Swiss and Southern European goat breed. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Luikart, G.; Gielly, L.; Excoffier, L.; Vigne, J.D.; Bouvet, J.; Taberlet, P. Multiple maternal origins and weak phylogeographic structure in domestic goats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 5927–5932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Naderi, S.; Rezaei, H.R.; Taberlet, P.; Zundel, S.; Rafat, S.A.; Naghash, H.R.; El-Barody, M.A.A.; Ertugrul, O.; Pompanon, F.; Econogene Consortium. Large scale mitochondrial DNA analysis of the domestic goat reveals six haplogroups with high diversity. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Colli, L.; Lancioni, H.; Cardinali, I.; Olivieri, A.; Capodiferro, M.R.; Pellecchia, M.; Rzepus, M.; Zamani, W.; Naderi, S.; Gandini, F.; et al. Whole mitochondrial genomes unveil the impact of domestication on goat matrilineal variability. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Amills, M.; Capote, J.; Tosser-Klopp, G. Goat domestication and breeding: A jigsaw of historical, biological and molecular data with missing piece. Anim. Genet. 2017, 48, 631–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sultana, S.; Mannen, H.; Tsuji, S. Mitochondrial DNA diversity of Pakistani goats. Anim. Genet. 2003, 34, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sardina, M.T.; Ballester, M.; Marmi, J.; Finocchiaro, R.; van Kaam, J.B.C.H.M.; Portolano, B.; Folch, J.M. Phylogenetic analysis of Sicilian goats reveals a new mtDNA lineage. Anim. Genet. 2006, 37, 376–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Naderi, S.; Rezaei, H.R.; Pompanon, F.; Blum, M.G.B.; Negrini, R.; Naghash, H.R.; Balkız, O.; Mashkour, M.; Gaggiotti, O.E.; Ajmone-Marsan, P.; et al. The goat domestication process inferred from large-scale mitochondrial DNA analysis of wild and domestic individuals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 17659–17664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sechi, T.; Miari, S.; Piras, D.; Crasta, L.; Mulas, G.; Carta, A. Genetic variation of goat Y chromosome in the Sardinian population. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 8, 159–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Doro, M.G.; Piras, D.; Leoni, G.G.; Casu, G.; Vaccargiu, S.; Parracciani, D.; Naitana, S.; Pirastu, M.; Novelletto, A. Phylogeny and Patterns of Diversity of Goat mtDNA Haplogroup A Revealed by Resequencing Complete Mitogenomes. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Carcangiu, V.; Vacca, G.M.; Parmeggiani, A.; Mura, M.C.; Bini, P.P. Blood melatonin levels relating to the reproductive activity of sarda does. Small Rum. Res. 2005, 59, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pazzola, M.; Dettori, M.L.; Carcangiu, V.; Luridiana, S.; Mura, M.C.; Vacca, G.M. Relationship between milk urea, blood plasma urea and body condition score in primiparous browsing goats with different milk yield level. Arch. Tierz. 2011, 54, 546–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lenstra, J.A. Evolutionary and demographic history of sheep and goats suggested by nuclear mtDNA and Y-chromosome markers. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Role of Biotechnology for the Characterization of Crop, Forestry, Animal and Fishery Genetic Resources, Turin, Piemonte, Italy, 5–7 March 2005; pp. 97–100. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pereira, F.; Carneiro, J.; Soares, P.; Maciel, S.; Nejmeddine, F.; Lenstra, J.A.; Gusmão, L.; Amorim, A. A multiplex primer extension assay for the rapid identification of paternal lineages in domestic goat (Capra hircus): Laying the foundations for a detailed caprine Y chromosome phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 49, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Servei Veterinari de Genetica Molecular, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Available online: http://sct.uab.cat/svgm/en (accessed on 9 October 2020).
  31. Martinez, A.; Ferrando, A.; Manunza, A.; Gomez, M.; Landi, V.; Jordana, J.; Capote, J.; Badaoui, B.; Vidal, O.; Delgado, J.V.; et al. Inferring the demographic history of a highly endangered goat breed through the analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial genetic signatures. Small Rum. Res. 2012, 104, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Amills, M.; Capote, J.; Tomàs, A.; Kelly, L.; Obexer-Ruff, G.; Angiolillo, A.; Sanchez, A. Strong phylogeographic relationships among three goat breeds from the Canary Islands. J. Dairy Res. 2004, 71, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ewing, L.; Green, P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998, 8, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ewing, L.; Hillier, L.; Wendl, M.C.; Green, P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998, 8, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Nickerson, D.A.; Tobe, V.O.; Taylor, S.L. PolyPhred: Automating the detection and genotyping of single nucleotide substitutions using fluorescence-based resequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 2745–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bhangale, T.R.; Stephens, M.; Nickerson, D.A. Automating resequencing based detection of insertion-deletion polymorphisms. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 1457–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gordon, D.; Abajian, C.; Green, P. Consed: A graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998, 8, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Gordon, D.; Desmarais, C.; Green, P. Automated finishing with autofinish. Genome Res. 2001, 11, 614–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Gordon, D. Viewing and editing assembled sequences using Consed. In Current Protocols in Bioinformatics; Baxevanis, D., Davison, D.B., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 1121–1124. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Librado, P.; Rozas, J. DNAspv5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1451–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Hudson, R.R.; Slatkin, M.; Maddison, W.P. Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 1992, 132, 583–589. [Google Scholar]
  43. Network Software v.10. Available online: www.fluxus-engineering.com (accessed on 3 October 2020).
  44. Excoffier, L.; Lischer, H.E.L. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2010, 10, 564–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Leigh, J.W.; Bryant, D. POPART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015, 6, 1110–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hassanin, A.; Bonillo, C.; Nguyen, B.X.; Cruaud, C. Comparisons between mitochondrial genomes of domestic goat (Capra hircus) reveal the presence of numts and multiple sequencing errors. Mitochondrial DNA 2010, 21, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Paschino, P.; Stocco, G.; Dettori, M.L.; Pazzola, M.; Marongiu, M.L.; Pilo, C.E.; Cipolat-Gotet, C.; Vacca, G.M. Characterization of milk composition, coagulation properties and cheese-making ability of goats reared in extensive farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 5830–5843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mattone, A.; Lilliu, G. La Costante Resistenziale Sarda; Ilisso: Nuoro, Italy, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  49. Brown, P.J. Cultural adaptations to endemic malaria in Sardinia. Med. Anthropol. 1981, 5, 313–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Colli, L.; Milanesi, M.; Talenti, A.; Bertolini, F.; Chen, M.; Crisà, A.; Daly, K.G.; Del Corvo, M.; Guldbrandtsen, B.; Lenstra, J.A.; et al. Genome-wide SNP profiling of worldwide goat populations reveals strong partitioning of diversity and highlights post-domestication migration routes. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2018, 50, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Cardoso, T.F.; Amills, M.; Bertolini, F.; Rothschild, M.; Marras, G.; Boink, G.; Jordana, J.; Capote, J.; Carolan, S.; Hallsson, J.H.; et al. Patterns of homozygosity in insular and continental goat breeds. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2018, 50, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Abulafia, D. The Mediterranean in History; Getty Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  53. Porter, V.; Alderson, L.; Hall, S.J.G.; Sponenberg, D.P. (Eds.) Mason’s World Encyclopedia of Livestock Breeds and Breeding; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2016; pp. 343–420. [Google Scholar]
Animals 10 02194 g001 550
Figure 1. Neighbour joining tree of Sarda bucks from different Sardinia locations based on FST coefficients estimated from Y-chromosome data. Populations included in the phylogenetic tree are: Nuorese (n = 12), Barbagia (n = 10), Baronia (n = 10), Ogliastra (n = 42), Sarrabus (n = 7), Guspinese (n = 10), Iglesiente (n = 15), Sulcis (n = 40).
Figure 1. Neighbour joining tree of Sarda bucks from different Sardinia locations based on FST coefficients estimated from Y-chromosome data. Populations included in the phylogenetic tree are: Nuorese (n = 12), Barbagia (n = 10), Baronia (n = 10), Ogliastra (n = 42), Sarrabus (n = 7), Guspinese (n = 10), Iglesiente (n = 15), Sulcis (n = 40).
Animals 10 02194 g001
Animals 10 02194 g002 550
Figure 2. Median joining network based on Y-chromosome haplotypes of 140 Sardinian bucks.
Figure 2. Median joining network based on Y-chromosome haplotypes of 140 Sardinian bucks.
Animals 10 02194 g002
Animals 10 02194 g003 550
Figure 3. Sampling area and geographic distribution of the Y-chromosome haplotypes of Sarda bucks in the island of Sardinia (Italy). The size of each circle is proportional to the number of individuals.
Figure 3. Sampling area and geographic distribution of the Y-chromosome haplotypes of Sarda bucks in the island of Sardinia (Italy). The size of each circle is proportional to the number of individuals.
Animals 10 02194 g003
Animals 10 02194 g004 550
Figure 4. Median joining network based on mtDNA haplotypes of 144 Sardinian bucks. The size of each circle is proportional to the number of individuals.
Figure 4. Median joining network based on mtDNA haplotypes of 144 Sardinian bucks. The size of each circle is proportional to the number of individuals.
Animals 10 02194 g004
Animals 10 02194 g005 550
Figure 5. Median joining network based on mtDNA sequences from goats from Middle Europe (37), Mediterranean Europe (87), Middle East (73), North Africa (32), and 144 Sardinian bucks. The size of each circle is proportional to the number of individuals.
Figure 5. Median joining network based on mtDNA sequences from goats from Middle Europe (37), Mediterranean Europe (87), Middle East (73), North Africa (32), and 144 Sardinian bucks. The size of each circle is proportional to the number of individuals.
Animals 10 02194 g005
Table
Table 1. Y-chromosome polymorphisms and haplotypes analyzed in 140 bucks from the Sarda breed.
Table 1. Y-chromosome polymorphisms and haplotypes analyzed in 140 bucks from the Sarda breed.
HaplotypeSRY 2971SRY 3098SRY 1876AMELY 42ZFY 527ZFY 46DDX3Y 56Haplotype Frequency%
Y1ATGACACG66.44
Y2TAACGCC28.57
Y1CAGCCACG3.57
Y1B1AGACACG0.71
Y1B2AGACATG0.71
Table
Table 2. Distribution of Y-chromosome haplotypes in Sarda bucks from eight regions of Sardinia.
Table 2. Distribution of Y-chromosome haplotypes in Sarda bucks from eight regions of Sardinia.
RegionNumber of HaplotypesHaplotype DiversityNumber of Animals
Nuorese20.16612
Barbagia20.20010
Baronia20.2508
Ogliastra30.50439
Sarrabus20.5717
Guspinese20.46610
Iglesiente30.67014
Sulcis40.52940
Overall population50.479140
Table
Table 3. FST values calculated with DnaSP from Y-chromosome data.
Table 3. FST values calculated with DnaSP from Y-chromosome data.
HeadingSulcisGuspineseSarrabusOgliastraNuoreseBaroniaBarbagia
Guspinese0.00
Sarrabus0.000.00
Ogliastra0.000.000.00
Nuorese0.140.050.160.16
Baronia0.070.000.080.080.00
Barbagia0.120.020.130.130.000.00
Iglesiente0.050.030.050.060.090.050.07
Table
Table 4. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on Y-chromosome data from Sarda bucks distributed in eight regions of Sardinia.
Table 4. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on Y-chromosome data from Sarda bucks distributed in eight regions of Sardinia.
Source of Variationd.f.Sum of SquaresVariance ComponentsPercentage of Variation
Among populations76.8280.01755 Va2.47%
Within populations13291.3500.69205 Vb97.53%
Total13998.1790.70960
Fixation Index FST: 0.02473 p-value = 0.18
Table
Table 5. Nucleotide and haplotype diversities of 144 Sarda bucks based on mtDNA sequence data.
Table 5. Nucleotide and haplotype diversities of 144 Sarda bucks based on mtDNA sequence data.
RegionNucleotide Diversity, ΠNumber of HaplotypesHaplotype Diversity, HdSample Size
Nuorese0.017110.98412
Barbagia0.020101.00010
Baronia0.01590.97710
Ogliastra0.013300.98442
Sarrabus0.01240.8666
Guspinese0.01380.95510
Iglesiente0.013130.98015
Sulcis0.012320.98939
Overall population0.013940.992144
Table
Table 6. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on mtDNA data of Sarda bucks from eight subregions of Sardinia.
Table 6. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on mtDNA data of Sarda bucks from eight subregions of Sardinia.
Source of Variationd.f.Sum of
Squares		Variance
Components		Percentage of
Variation
Among populations740.850−0.02873 Va−0.46%
Within populations136858.5536.31289 Vb100.46%
Total143899.4036.28416
Fixation Index FST: −0.00457 p-value = 0.62
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dettori, M.L.; Petretto, E.; Pazzola, M.; Vidal, O.; Amills, M.; Vacca, G.M. Assessing the Diversity and Population Substructure of Sarda Breed Bucks by Using Mtdna and Y-Chromosome Markers. Animals 2020, 10, 2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122194

AMA Style

Dettori ML, Petretto E, Pazzola M, Vidal O, Amills M, Vacca GM. Assessing the Diversity and Population Substructure of Sarda Breed Bucks by Using Mtdna and Y-Chromosome Markers. Animals. 2020; 10(12):2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122194

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dettori, Maria Luisa, Elena Petretto, Michele Pazzola, Oriol Vidal, Marcel Amills, and Giuseppe Massimo Vacca. 2020. "Assessing the Diversity and Population Substructure of Sarda Breed Bucks by Using Mtdna and Y-Chromosome Markers" Animals 10, no. 12: 2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122194

APA Style

Dettori, M. L., Petretto, E., Pazzola, M., Vidal, O., Amills, M., & Vacca, G. M. (2020). Assessing the Diversity and Population Substructure of Sarda Breed Bucks by Using Mtdna and Y-Chromosome Markers. Animals, 10(12), 2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122194

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop