Next Article in Journal
Comparison of a Short Linear Antimicrobial Peptide with Its Disulfide-Cyclized and Cyclotide-Grafted Variants against Clinically Relevant Pathogens
Previous Article in Journal
Arabidopsis Restricts Sugar Loss to a Colonizing Trichoderma harzianum Strain by Downregulating SWEET11 and -12 and Upregulation of SUC1 and SWEET2 in the Roots
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cytoplasmic Mixing, Not Nuclear Coexistence, Can Explain Somatic Incompatibility in Basidiomycetes

1
Laboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
2
Mushroom Group, Plant Breeding Department, Wageningen University and Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
3
CNC Grondstoffen, P.O. Box 13, 6590 AA Gennep, The Netherlands
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(6), 1248; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061248
Submission received: 28 April 2021 / Revised: 3 June 2021 / Accepted: 4 June 2021 / Published: 8 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recognition and Response to Non-self in Fungi)

Abstract

Nonself recognition leading to somatic incompatibility (SI) is commonly used by mycologists to distinguish fungal individuals. Despite this, the process remains poorly understood in basidiomycetes as all current models of SI are based on genetic and molecular research in ascomycete fungi. Ascomycete fungi are mainly found in a monokaryotic stage, with a single type of haploid nuclei, and only briefly during mating do two genomes coexist in heterokaryotic cells. The sister phylum, Basidiomycota, differs in several relevant aspects. Basidiomycete fungi have an extended heterokaryotic stage, and SI is generally observed between heterokaryons instead of between homokaryons. Additionally, considerable nuclear migration occurs during a basidiomycete mating reaction, introducing a nucleus into a resident homokaryon with cytoplasmic mixing limited to the fused or neighboring cells. To accommodate these differences, we describe a basidiomycete model for nonself recognition using post-translational modification, based on a reader-writer system as found in other organisms. This post-translational modification combined with nuclear migration allows for the coexistence of two genomes in one individual while maintaining nonself recognition during all life stages. Somewhat surprisingly, this model predicts localized cell death during mating, which is consistent with previous observations but differs from the general assumptions of basidiomycete mating. This model will help guide future research into the mechanisms behind basidiomycete nonself recognition.
Keywords: basidiomycete; allorecognition; nonself recognition; somatic incompatibility; vegetative incompatibility basidiomycete; allorecognition; nonself recognition; somatic incompatibility; vegetative incompatibility

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Auxier, B.; Scholtmeijer, K.; van Peer, A.F.; Baars, J.J.P.; Debets, A.J.M.; Aanen, D.K. Cytoplasmic Mixing, Not Nuclear Coexistence, Can Explain Somatic Incompatibility in Basidiomycetes. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061248

AMA Style

Auxier B, Scholtmeijer K, van Peer AF, Baars JJP, Debets AJM, Aanen DK. Cytoplasmic Mixing, Not Nuclear Coexistence, Can Explain Somatic Incompatibility in Basidiomycetes. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(6):1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Auxier, Ben, Karin Scholtmeijer, Arend F. van Peer, Johan J. P. Baars, Alfons J. M. Debets, and Duur K. Aanen. 2021. "Cytoplasmic Mixing, Not Nuclear Coexistence, Can Explain Somatic Incompatibility in Basidiomycetes" Microorganisms 9, no. 6: 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061248

APA Style

Auxier, B., Scholtmeijer, K., van Peer, A. F., Baars, J. J. P., Debets, A. J. M., & Aanen, D. K. (2021). Cytoplasmic Mixing, Not Nuclear Coexistence, Can Explain Somatic Incompatibility in Basidiomycetes. Microorganisms, 9(6), 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop