Next Article in Journal
Correction: Wang, B., et al. Pectin Degradation Is an Important Determinant for Alfalfa Silage Fermentation through the Rescheduling of the Bacterial Community. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 488
Next Article in Special Issue
Metagenomic Insight into Environmentally Challenged Methane-Fed Microbial Communities
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Impact on Differential Composition of Gut Microbiota in Indoor Chickens in Commercial Production and Outdoor, Backyard Chickens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 5
10.3390/microorganisms8050768
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pan-Genome-Based Analysis as a Framework for Demarcating Two Closely Related Methanotroph Genera Methylocystis and Methylosinus

by
Igor Y. Oshkin
1,*,
Kirill K. Miroshnikov
1,
Denis S. Grouzdev
2 and
Svetlana N. Dedysh
1
1
Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119071, Russia
2
Institute of Bioengineering, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119071, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(5), 768; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050768
Submission received: 16 April 2020 / Revised: 17 May 2020 / Accepted: 17 May 2020 / Published: 20 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biology, Diversity, and Ecology of Methanotrophic Bacteria)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Methylocystis and Methylosinus are two of the five genera that were included in the first taxonomic framework of methanotrophic bacteria created half a century ago. Members of both genera are widely distributed in various environments and play a key role in reducing methane fluxes from soils and wetlands. The original separation of these methanotrophs in two distinct genera was based mainly on their differences in cell morphology. Further comparative studies that explored various single-gene-based phylogenies suggested the monophyletic nature of each of these genera. Current availability of genome sequences from members of the Methylocystis/Methylosinus clade opens the possibility for in-depth comparison of the genomic potentials of these methanotrophs. Here, we report the finished genome sequence of Methylocystis heyeri H2T and compare it to 23 currently available genomes of Methylocystis and Methylosinus species. The phylogenomic analysis confirmed that members of these genera form two separate clades. The Methylocystis/Methylosinus pan-genome core comprised 1173 genes, with the accessory genome containing 4941 and 11,192 genes in the shell and the cloud, respectively. Major differences between the genome-encoded environmental traits of these methanotrophs include a variety of enzymes for methane oxidation and dinitrogen fixation as well as genomic determinants for cell motility and photosynthesis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aerobic methane-oxidizing bacteria (methanotrophs) are able to utilize methane (CH4) as a sole source of energy [1,2,3,4]. The first step of CH4 oxidation is catalyzed by methane monooxygenase (MMO) enzymes, which exist in membrane-bound or particulate (pMMO) and soluble (sMMO) forms [5,6]. Described aerobic MOB include species of the Gamma- and Alphaproteobacteria as well as the Verrucomicrobia [7]. The latter are restricted to acidic geothermal habitats and grow as autotrophs, using CO2 as the carbon source via the Calvin cycle [8,9].
The Methylocystis and Methylosinus are two of the five genera that were included in the first taxonomic framework of methanotrophic bacteria created half a century ago [10]. These methanotrophs belong to the family Methylocystaceae of the class Alphaproteobacteria [11]. The initial separation of these methanotrophs in two different genera was based mainly on differences in their cell morphology and the type of resting cells. Members of the genus Methylosinus possess pyriform or vibrioid cells, which reproduce by binary and budding division and are usually arranged in rosettes [12]. In budding division, the bud contains a heat and desiccation-resistant exospore, which germinates into a vegetative daughter cell; this daughter cell is highly motile. By contrast, cells of Methylocystis species are rod-like to reniform in shape, occur singly, are non-motile, reproduce by binary division, and may form desiccation-resistant ‘lipid’ cysts as resting cells [13]. To date, the genus Methylocystis includes 6 species with validly published names, i.e., Mc. parvus [13], Mc. echinoides [14], Mc. rosea [15], Mc. heyeri [16], Mc. hirsuta [17], and Mc. bryophila [18]. The taxonomically described diversity within the genus Methylosinus is limited and includes two species only: Ms. sporium and Ms. trichosporium [12]. In addition to these described members, the genera Methylocystis and Methylosinus are represented by a number of taxonomically uncharacterized strains, which were isolated from a wide variety of habitats including freshwater sediments, upland soils, termite gut, paddy soils and wetlands [19,20,21,22]. Although cosmopolitan distribution is characteristic for members of both genera, cultivation-independent studies suggest Methylocystis species as one of the most abundant and functionally active methanotrophs groups in various terrestrial environments [23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
Early attempts to resolve the phylogeny of the Methylocystis/Methylosinus group based on 16S rRNA gene sequences and a limited number of described strains failed to reveal any clear clustering pattern [1,11,30]. Further examination of a large collection (~80 strains) of these methanotrophs isolated from diverse environments demonstrated that molecular phylogenies constructed from nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequences and partial sequences of genes encoding PmoA (a subunit of pMMO) identified monophyletic clusters that could be correlated to three morphologically recognizable groups defined by Methylosinus trichosporium, Methylosinus sporium and Methylocystis spp. [20].
Growing number of available genome sequences from Methylocystis and Methylosinus species gives an opportunity to gain a deeper insight into the genome-encoded features of these methanotrophs. With the single exception of Mc. echinoides, genome sequences are now available for all described Methylocystis and Methylosinus species as well as for some representatives of these genera with as-yet-undefined taxonomic status. Genome analyses performed for representatives of both genera demonstrated the variability in the number and types of encoded methane monooxygenases. Besides conventional pMMO1 and soluble sMMO, these methanotrophs possess divergent methane monooxygenases pMMO2 and pXMO. pMMO2 was first discovered in Methylocystis sp. SC2 [21] and is associated with high affinity methane oxidation [31]. pXMO was shown to be present in many gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs [32] and is assumed to play a role in methane oxidation under hypoxic conditions [33].
Recently, we reported a draft genome sequence of Mc. heyeri H2T [34]. In this work, we undertook additional sequencing effort to assemble the complete genome of this peat-inhabiting methanotrophic bacterium. We used this newly assembled genome as well as all available genome sequences from other representatives of the Methylosinus/Methylocystis group in order to re-examine their phylogeny by means of comparative genome analysis and to reveal the genome-encoded traits, which differentiate these closely related methanotrophs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cultivation Procedure and DNA Extraction

The culture of Mc. heyeri H2T (= DSM 16984T = VKM B-2426T) was grown in a liquid mineral medium M2, containing (in grams per liter of distilled water) KNO3, 0.2; KH2PO4, 0.04; MgSO4 × 7H2O, 0.02; and CaCl2 × 2H2O, 0.004, with the addition of 0.1% (by volume) of a trace elements stock solution containing (in grams per liter) EDTA, 5; FeSO4 × 7H2O, 2; ZnSO4 × 7H2O, 0.1; MnCl2 × 4H2O, 0.03; CoCl2 × 6H2O, 0.2; CuCl2 × 5H2O, 0.1; NiCl2 × 6H2O, 0.02; and Na2MoO4, 0.03. A set of 500 mL bottles were filled to 30% capacity with this medium, sealed with rubber septa, and CH4 (30%, v/v) was added to the headspace using syringes equipped with disposable filters (0.22 µm). The cells were harvested after incubation at 24 °C on a rotary shaker at 100 rpm for 5 days. DNA extraction was done as described by Oshkin et al. [34].

2.2. Genome Sequencing and Assembly

The complete genome of Mc. heyeri H2T was assembled by combining a draft genome sequence of this methanotroph obtained in our previous study using PacBio RS II system [34] with the sequencing reads retrieved in this work using Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The library was constructed with the NEBNext DNA library prep reagent set, according to the Illumina protocol. Raw sequence reads were quality checked with FastQC version 11.7 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/), and low-quality reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic v. 0.36 [35], with the default settings for paired-end reads. Hybrid assembly and circularization of PacBio and Illumina reads were performed with Unicycler v. 0.4.8.0 [36]. The finished genome sequence of Mc. heyeri H2T has been deposited in the DDBJ/NCBI/EMBL databases (accession no. CP046052.1).

2.3. Selection of Reference Genomes and Phylogenomic Analysis

The available genome sequences of Methylocystis and Methylosinus species were retrieved from the GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). Of these, the complete genome sequences were available for Methylocystis sp. SC2 [37], Mc. bryophila S285 [38], Mc. rosea GW6, Mc. rosea BRCS1, Mc. parvus BRCS2, Ms. trichosporium OB3bT [39] and Methylosinus sp. C49. The quality of other genomes was assessed using CheckM v.1.0.13 [40] to exclude genomes with less than 90% completeness. The resulting set of methanotroph genomes selected for the analysis included 13 genomes of Methylocystis species and 10 genomes from Methylosinus species (Table 1).
A genome-based tree for members of the Methylocystis/Methylosinus group was reconstructed using the Genome Taxonomy Database and GTDB-toolkit (https://github.com/Ecogenomics/GtdbTk) [41], release 04-RS89. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using Mega X software [42].
Average nucleotide identities across Methylocystis and Methylosinus genomes were estimated using the program «Anvi-compute-genome-similarity» of the Anvi’o platform [43]. The resulting distance matrices were further visualized as a heatmap.

2.4. Core- and Pan-Genome Analysis

GET_HOMOLOGUES [44] software was used for the construction of pan-genome. BLASTp [45] hits with a minimum of 75% alignment length coverage and an E-value ≤1e-5 were considered. Clustering was performed based on OrthoMCL [46] algorithms with inflation parameter of 1.5. The pan-genome was divided into core, soft core, shell, and cloud genes. Core genes are defined as those present in all considered genomes, soft core genes are found in 95% of genomes, shell genes are present in more than 2 genomes and less than 95% of genomes, while cloud genes are found in not more than two genomes [45,46,47].
Additionally, the Anvi’o pangenomic workflow was used as a second method to construct the pan-genome [43,47]. The genomes were organized based on the distribution of gene clusters using MCL algorithm (Distance: Euclidean; Linkage: Ward). This method was also applied to determine singletons and single-copy gene clusters (SCGs). Singletons are defined as genes present only in single genomes. SCGs are represented by only one copy in each genome. Genes representing core, shell and cloud genome were functionally annotated against COG database [48] using eggNOG-mapper v2 [49]. Heatmaps based on the annotated COG functions of the core and singleton gene clusters were then plotted in R [50].

2.5. Analysis of Functional Genes

Comparison of selected genes encoding several environmentally relevant traits was performed using the BLASTp [51]. Phylogenetic clustering of the nitrogenase-encoding genes was visualized using the Cytoscape program [52]. The location of target genes in the genomes was analyzed using the UGENE software package [53]. Comparison of gene clusters was performed using the BLASTp algorithm, and the results were visualized using the Easyfig program [54]. Intra-genomic rearrangements were studied using the progressive Mauve algorithm [55].

3. Results

3.1. Genome Characteristics of Mc. heyeri H2T

The genome assembly obtained for Mc. heyeri H2T in our previous study using PacBio RS II system consisted of 12 genomic contigs with an N50 value of 3,287,266 bp [34]. The additional round of sequencing on Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform made in this work yielded a total of 4,726,348 paired-end reads, with a mean read length of 150 bp. The final hybrid genome assembly for Mc. heyeri H2T consisted of one circular chromosome sequence of 4,551,947 bp (G+C content of 63.1%) and two plasmids with lengths of 145,219 and 30,622 bp and G+C contents of 61.1 and 60.2%, respectively. The chromosome contains three identical rrn operon copies (16S-23S-5S rRNA), 53 tRNA genes, 3976 predicted protein-coding sequences, at least one Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) locus, and a set of CRISPR-associated (cas) genes. Relatively low number of insertion sequence elements (48) suggests moderate genome plasticity.

3.2. Genome-Based Phylogeny

The genome-based phylogeny of representatives of the genera Methylosinus and Methylocystis was determined based on the comparative sequence analysis of 120 ubiquitous single-copy proteins (Figure 1). Members of these two genera formed two separate clades which, in their turn, formed a super-clade of Methylocystaceae methanotrophs. The latter was clearly divergent from the clade of Beijerinckiaceae methanotrophs represented by members of the genera Methylocella, Methylocapsa, and Methyloferula. The species within the Methylosinus clade were clustered in 5 groups: I) Ms. sp. R-45379, Ms. sp. LW3, Ms. sp. C49; II) Ms. sp. PW1, Ms. sp. LW4; III) Ms. sporium SM89A, Ms. sporium DSM 17706T; IV) Ms. sp. Ce-a6; V) Ms. trichosporium OB3bT, Ms. sp. 3S-1. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) values were estimated for each pair of the genomes (Figure S1). ANI values calculated for four groups of Methylosinus species represented by several strains (I-III and V) were as follows: I) 89-94%; II) 90%; III) 95%; V) 97%. This indicates that Ms. sporium SM89A and Ms. sporium DSM 17706T (group III) as well as Ms. trichosporium OB3bT and Ms. sp. 3S-1 (group V) belong to the same species as intra-species level is defined at ≥95% ANI [56,57]. Thus, estimated diversity within the clade of currently available Methylosinus strains with determined genome sequences corresponds to 8 species.
The clade of Methylocystis-affiliated strains includes 6 groups: I) Mc. heyeri H2T, Mc. bryophila S285; II) Mc. parvus OBBPT, Mc. parvus BRCS2, Mc. sp. ATCC 49242; III) Mc. sp. B8; IV) Mc. sp. SC2; V) Mc. hirsuta CSC1T; VI) Mc. sp. MitZ-2018, Mc. rosea GW6, Mc. rosea SV97T, Mc. sp. SB2, Mc. rosea BRCS1. ANI values calculated for the groups represented by several strains were as follows: I) 68-69%; II) 78-97%; VI) 92-95%. Only Mc. parvus OBBPT and Mc. parvus BRCS2 from group II as well as two sub-groups of strains from group VI (Mc. sp. MitZ-2018, Mc. sp. SB2 and Mc. rosea SV97T, Mc. sp. SB2, Mc. rosea BRCS1) can be classified as belonging to the same species. The total estimated diversity within the clade of analyzed Methylocystis strains, therefore, corresponds to 9 species.

3.3. Pan-Genome Analysis

To study the Methylocystis/Methylosinus pan-genome, two different approaches were used (see Methods). The first, GET_HOMOLOGUES-based approach clustered protein-coding sequences into core, soft core, shell, and cloud genomes [44]. Of 17,724 gene clusters, the Methylocystis/Methylosinus pan-genome core comprised 1173 genes (on average 29.3% of each genome), with the accessory genome containing 4941 gene clusters in the shell (27.9% of total gene clusters) and 11,192 in the cloud (63.1% of total gene clusters) (Figure 2).
The Anvi’o pangenomics workflow was used as a double-check procedure in order to verify the size of the core- and pan-genome. According to this approach, the Methylocystis/Methylosinus pan-genome comprised 18,322 gene clusters with 1341 genes in the core and 8065 gene clusters represented as singletons, which are defined as genes present in only one genome (Figure 3). Singletons constitute the cloud genome along with gene clusters containing genes from not more than two genomes. Although both approaches use MCL algorithm to identify clusters, Anvi’o pangenomics workflow detected more gene clusters. This possibly resulted in higher number of core genes. The pan-genome of Methylocystis/Methylosinus group is large and open. Figure S2 displays the number of core genes (A) and the pan-genome size (B) as a function of the number of included genomes. Fitting the curve in Figure S2B to a power law (4366.6n0.2969) allows extrapolating calculations to n genomes. Even if 100 genome sequences would have been determined, it is expected that sequencing another one would further add 50 genes to the pan-genome. Such calculations made separately for Methylocystis and Methylosinus pan-genomes resulted in 31 and 55 genes, reflecting less open pan-genome for the genus Methylocystis (Figure S3).
The core, shell, and cloud gene clusters were further annotated into COG classes (Figure 4). The core genome was mostly conserved in the following: translation and ribosomal biogenesis (10.5% of total core gene clusters), amino acid transport and metabolism (9.3%), energy production and conversion (8.3%), coenzyme transport and metabolism (6.9%), lipid transport and metabolism (6.9%), cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (6.3%), and post-translational modifications (5.6%) (Figure 4). The classes for inorganic ion transport and metabolism (4.9%), replication, transcription, carbohydrate metabolism (4.4%), nucleotide transport and metabolism (3.3%), signal transduction (2.8%) and secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism (2.3%) were moderately abundant while intracellular trafficking and cell cycle control were limited in the core (1.5%).
The same functional categories, with addition of defense and cell motility functions, constituted the shell genome. High variability was observed for the transcription, replication and repair, cell wall/membrane/envelop biogenesis, inorganic ion transport and metabolism, and signal transduction. The latter category was especially well represented in the shell genome of Methylosinus strains (Figure 4). Indeed, the analysis of most abundant classes of signal transduction genes revealed that Methylosinus and Methylocystis genomes encode, respectively, 348 and 302 histidine kinases (HisKA, PF00512), 118 and 49 diguanylate cyclases (GGDEF domain, PF00990), 53 and 30 c-di-GMP-specific phosphodiesterases (EAL domain, PF00563), 89 and 7 methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPsignal domain, PF00015). Overall, the total number of signaling proteins identified in shell genome constituted 658 for Methylosinus and 472 for Methylocystis strains. The most abundant functional categories in the cloud genome were represented by replication, transcription, cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis, and signal transduction mechanisms.

3.4. MMO-Encoding Genes

All methanotrophs of the Methylocystis/Methylosinus groups are characterized by the presence of conventional pMMO (or pMMO1) encoded by the pmoCAB1 operon (Table 1). These genes are part of the core genome as they were found in all studied members of the Methylocystis/Methylosinus group. The pmoCAB2 operon, which encodes high-affinity pMMO2, occurs in the genomes of most representatives of the genus Methylosinus except for Ms. trichosporium OB3bT and Methylosinus sp. 3S-1. By contrast, pmoCAB2 was identified in less than half of the analyzed Methylocystis genomes, including Mc. heyeri H2T, Mc. parvus OBBPT, Mc. parvus BRCS2, Mc. bryophila S285, Methylocystis sp. SC2 and Methylocystis sp. B8. An opposite distribution pattern was observed for the pxmABC operon, which was identified in genomes of seven Methylocystis strains and only one genome of Methylosinus species, i.e., Methylosinus sp. R-45379. Genes encoding sMMO were present in the genomes of nearly all representatives of the genus Methylosinus with the only exception of Methylosinus sp. Ce-a6. The occurrence of sMMO in members of the genus Methylocystis was rarer, as the corresponding operons were found only in the genomes of Mc. hirsuta CSC1T, Mc. heyeri H2T and Mc. bryophila S285. The entire set of genes for the alternative methane monooxygenases was clustered in the shell pan-genome. Additionally, singleton pmoC copies were distributed across core, shell, and cloud pan-genome.

3.5. Nitrogenase-Encoding Genes

Genes coding for the classical molybdenum–iron (Mo-Fe) nitrogenase were identified in all studied genomes of Methylocystis and Methylosinus species (Figure 5) and formed a separate cluster in the core genome. Interestingly, an additional gene cluster of rare vanadium–iron (V-Fe) nitrogenases was identified among the shell genes. V-Fe nitrogenases are present only in some Methylocystis species, such as Mc. heyeri H2T, Mc. bryophila S285 and both strains of Mc. parvus, but are absent in all representatives of the genus Methylosinus (Figure 5).
Comparative sequence analysis of the nitrogenase beta subunit proteins from proteobacterial methanotrophs revealed four phylogenetically distinct groups, three of which correspond to Mo-Fe nitrogenases and one is represented by V-Fe nitrogenases (Figure 6). Notably, proteins from Methylocystis and Methylosinus species are present in all these four groups. This suggests that representatives of the Methylocystis/Methylosinus groups received nitrogenase-encoding genes from different sources.

3.6. Genomic Determinants of Flagella-Based Motility

Genes encoding flagella biosynthesis were found in the genomes of all Methylosinus species (Figure 5). The occurrence of these genes in the genomes of Methylocystis species is rare. The complete set of flagella-encoding genes was identified only in the genomes of Methylocystis sp. ATCC 49242 and two strains of Mc. parvus.

3.7. Phototrophy-Related Genes

Genes necessary for the synthesis of bacteriochlorophyll a and b (bchBCDEGHIJNLMNOPXYZ and acsF), reaction center of the photosynthetic complex (pufABCML and pucC) and a number of carotenoids (crtCDF) are present in the genomes of all Methylocystis rosea strains as well as Methylocystis sp. MitZ-2018 and SB2 (Supplementary Figure S4). Most of these genes are arranged in a single gene cluster (Figure 7), which is a part of the long conservative region (~195 kbp; locus 1487014-1681855 in the genome of Methylocystis rosea BRCS1) present in the genomes of all Mc. rosea representatives. This region also includes a number of genes associated with the nitrogenase complex, regulatory and transport genes.

4. Discussion

In this work, methanotrophs of the Methylocystis/Methylosinus group were studied using pan-genomic approach. We analyzed all publicly available, good-quality genome sequences of the taxonomically described Methylocystis and Methylosinus species and strains with as-yet-undefined taxonomic status. In addition, the complete genome sequence of Mc. heyeri H2T was obtained and included in the pan-genomic workflow. Genome-based phylogenetic reconstructions and pair-wise ANI calculations performed in our study confirm the clear demarcation of these methanotroph genera, which was suggested earlier based on the comparative analysis of 16S rRNA and pmoA gene sequences [20].
The key features common to Methylocystis and Methylosinus species are the possession of an extended set of MMO-encoding genes and the ability to fix dinitrogen. All members of these genera possess conventional pMMO, pMMO1. One or two copies of the corresponding gene clusters (Table 1) are part of the core genome of these methanotrophs. The genes encoding all other currently known MMO types are clustered separately in the shell genome. With the only exception of Mc. sp. ATCC 49242, all members of the Methylocystis/Methylosinus group possess several MMO types. In addition to pMMO1, many Methylocystis and Methylosinus strains possess pMMO2, which is associated with high-affinity methane oxidation [31]. Although pmoA2 gene was first identified in Methylocystis sp. SC2 [21], the corresponding enzyme is encoded only in half of the examined Methylocystis genomes. In contrast, pmoCAB2 operon was detected in the genomes of most Methylosinus strains. Overall, this indicates that significant part of organisms from Methylosinus/Methylocystis group has metabolic potential to thrive both in high-methane and low-methane environments. The pxmABC operon encoding pXMO was encoded in eight of 23 examined methanotroph genomes, including seven Methylocystis genomes and only one Methylosinus genome (Methylosinus sp. R-45379). Recent evidence for pxmABC expression in response to hypoxia suggests that pXMO is important for the survival of methanotrophs under limited O2 concentrations [33]. However, two Methylosinus strains included in this study, strains LW3 and LW4, were isolated from the Lake Washington sediment where concentration of oxygen is low and drops significantly within top 0.8 cm of the sediment [19]. No pXMO is encoded in their genomes although, apparently, they should be able to survive at low oxygen concentration. Finally, the presence of sMMO seems to be a characteristic feature of Methylosinus species since it was encoded in almost all of the examined Methylosinus genomes except of strain Ce-a6. By contrast, only three of the examined Methylocystis genomes encoded sMMO.
Methylocystis and Methylosinus species have long been known for their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen [14], which is one of the most important environmental traits of methanotrophic bacteria. Indeed, genes encoding classical Mo-Fe nitrogenases were identified in all studied genomes. Interestingly, a separate cluster in the pan-genome was formed by the genes encoding alternative nitrogenase, which contains vanadium and iron as active site cofactors (V-Fe-nitrogenase). This type of nitrogenase was present in several strains of Methylocystis species only (Figure 5). The Mo- and V-containing nitrogenases are not equally distributed in nature [59]. While Mo-Fe-nitrogenases are found in all known diazotrophs, V-Fe-nitrogenases have been identified in the genomes of a limited number of prokaryotes [60]. These include some diazotrophs within the Gamma- and Deltaproteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Firmicutes, and Euryarchaeota from a wide variety of habitats such as freshwater, lichens, termite gut, freshwater, and marine sediments, wheat roots and soils [61]. The search among sequenced genomes suggested that organisms with alternative nitrogenases are common in sediments. Recently, the presence of V-Fe-nitrogenase was reported for Methylocystis bryophila S285 [38] and Methylospira mobilis Shm1 [62]. We also searched for V-Fe-nitrogenase in other available methanotroph genomes. In addition to Ms. mobilis Shm1, Mc. bryophila S285, Mc. parvus BRCS2 and Mc. parvus OBBPT, vnf genes were present only in ‘Ca. Methylobacter oryzae’ [63]. Notably, all Methylocystis strains with V-Fe-nitrogenases were isolated from wetland ecosystems. The conventional Mo-Fe-nitrogenase was shown to be synthesized in the absence of a fixed nitrogen source when Mo is available, whereas the V-Fe-nitrogenase is expressed under Mo-deficient conditions in the presence of V [64]. We suggest that the presence of several forms of nitrogenases with different metals in the active center can be considered as an adaptation to the low availability of inorganic nutrients in wetlands. At the standard temperature for both in vivo and in vitro assays (i.e., 30 °C), the specific activity of V-Fe-nitrogenase is consistently lower than that of its Mo-Fe-counterpart. When the temperature is lowered (e.g., to 5 °C), V-Fe-nitrogenase becomes more active than Mo-Fe-nitrogenase [65]. Given that more than half of total wetland area is located between 50 and 70°N, the possession of V-Fe-nitrogenases might represent an adaptation strategy to low temperatures in these environments. Finally, the ability of V-Fe-nitrogenase to catalyze both CO and N2 reductions suggests a potential link between the evolution of the carbon and nitrogen cycles in wetlands [66].
One of the major features used to differentiate Methylocystis and Methylosinus species is the absence/presence of motility. Indeed, all currently characterized species of the genus Methylocystis were described as being represented by non-motile cells, while all Methylosinus species are characterized by flagella-based motility. This phenotypic differentiation was supported by the results of our analysis, which revealed the presence of flagella-encoding genes in all examined genomes of Methylosinus species. The complete sets of these genes were also revealed in the genomes of three Methylocystis strains (Figure 5). In addition, these strains also possessed histidine kinase CheA that mediates signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis. However, we did not find any reports for their capacity to move. It may well be that expression of motility genes in these methanotrophs occurs in the environment but not under laboratory conditions. Experimental evidence for the presence of motility in Methylocystis species was obtained in the field study of Putkinen et al. [67] who demonstrated rapid, water-mediated colonization of Sphagnum mosses by peat-inhabiting members of the genus Methylocystis. The phenotypic difference between Methylocystis and Methylosinus species may be due to the different specialization of representatives of these genera. Indeed, the metabolic flexibility of Methylocystis species appears to be wider than that of Methylosinus species. Thus, many members of the genus Methylocystis are facultative methanotrophs capable of slow growth on acetate and ethanol in the absence of methane [68]. As shown in our study, some of these bacteria possess genome-encoded potential for phototrophy. Finally, possession of two different forms of nitrogenase also extends the range of environmental conditions suitable for growth of Methylocystis species. Thus, methanotrophs of the genus Methylocystis are potentially adapted to a wider range of environmental conditions than representatives of the genus Methylosinus. The latter, therefore, move to more favorable environment through flagella-associated motility. The composition of signal transduction proteins directly associated with chemotaxis also supports this idea. Those are mainly represented by MCPs, the predominant chemoreceptors in bacteria which are more abundant in genomes of motile microbes [69]. Methylocystis genomes encode very few MCPs, while the number of those present in Methylosinus strains is one order of magnitude higher.
Representatives of one particular species of the genus Methylocystis, Mc. rosea, are characterized by the presence of a gene cluster associated with phototrophy; these genes were not detected in the genomes of Methylosinus species. Similar genes have been previously found in some other alphaproteobacterial methanotrophs of the family Beijerinckiaceae, namely the species Methylocapsa palsarum and Methylocella silvestris [70]. In contrast to methanotrophic representatives of the Beijerinckiaceae, the organization of phototrophy-related gene clusters in Mc. rosea is extremely conservative (Figure 7). This may be due to the peculiarities of regulation of this gene cluster. The high similarity in the organization of genetic clusters may confirm the recently proposed hypothesis about the origin of phototrophy-related genes from a common ancestor [71]. According to this theory, the majority of the Methylocystis genus representatives have lost the gene cluster associated with phototrophy due to the specialization in methanotrophy.
In summary, the pan-genome analysis of 23 genome sequences from seven taxonomically described and 16 as-yet-uncharacterized Methylocystis and Methylosinus strains proved to be an effective tool for the demarcation of these genera and identification of diverse genome-encoded traits that determine adaptations of these methanotrophs to a wide variety of environments. Open pan-genome of the Methylocystis/Methylosinus group highlights the need for further efforts in extending the number of characterized representatives of these bacteria with determined genome sequences.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/5/768/s1, Figure S1: Heatmap derived from an Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) matrix calculated for each pair of the genomes of Methylocystis/Methylosinus group, Figure S2: The Methylocystis/Methylosinus core genome (A) and pan-genome (B) as a function of the number of genomes included., Figure S3: The Methylocystis pan-genome (A) and Methylosinus pan-genome (B) as a function of the number of genomes included (V1–V24), Figure S4: Heatmap displaying distribution of phototrophy-related genes (green) and carotenoids biosynthesis genes (orange), photosystem II-related genes (purple).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N.D.; data curation, I.Y.O., K.K.M., and D.S.G.; formal analysis, I.Y.O. and K.K.M.; funding acquisition, I.Y.O. and K.K.M.; investigation, I.Y.O. and K.K.M.; methodology, I.Y.O., K.K.M., and S.N.D; supervision, S.N.D.; visualization, I.Y.O. and K.K.M.; writing—original draft, I.Y.O., K.K.M., and S.N.D.; writing—review & editing, I.Y.O. and S.N.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Pan-genome analysis, annotation of the complete genome of Mc. heyeri H2T, phylogenomic reconstructions, analysis of MMO- and nitrogenase-encoding genes were performed by I.Y.O. and supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 18-74-00058). Analysis of phototrophy-related and nitrogenase-encoding genes was performed by K.K.M. and supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-34-00363).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Hanson, R.; Hanson, T. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 60, 439–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Trotsenko, Y.A.; Murrell, J.C. Metabolic aspects of aerobic obligate methanotrophy. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 63, 183–229. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Chistoserdova, L.; Lidstrom, M.E. Aerobic Methylotrophic Prokaryotes. In The Prokaryotes: Prokaryotic Physiology and Biochemistry; Rosenberg, E., Delong, E., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E., Thompson, F., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 267–285. ISBN 9783642301414. [Google Scholar]
  4. Khmelenina, V.N.; Murrell, J.C.; Smith, T.J.; Trotsenko, Y.A. Physiology and Biochemistry of the Aerobic Methanotrophs. In Aerobic Utilization of Hydrocarbons, Oils and Lipids. Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology; Rojo, F., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1–25. ISBN 9783319397825. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lieberman, R.L.; Rosenzweig, A.C. Crystal structure of a membrane-bound metalloenzyme that catalyses the biological oxidation of methane. Nature 2005, 434, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hakemian, A.S.; Rosenzweig, A.C. The Biochemistry of Methane Oxidation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2007, 76, 223–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dedysh, S.N.; Knief, C. Diversity and phylogeny of described aerobic methanotrophs. In Methane Biocatalysis: Paving the Way to Sustainability; Kalyuzhnaya, M., Xing, X., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 17–42. ISBN 9783319748665. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sharp, C.E.; Smirnova, A.V.; Graham, J.M.; Stott, M.B.; Khadka, R.; Moore, T.R.; Grasby, S.E.; Strack, M.; Dunfield, P.F. Distribution and diversity of Verrucomicrobia methanotrophs in geothermal and acidic environments. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1867–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. van Teeseling, M.C.F.; Pol, A.; Harhangi, H.R.; van der Zwart, S.; Jetten, M.S.M.; Op den Camp, H.J.M.; van Niftrik, L. Expanding the verrucomicrobial methanotrophic world: Description of three novel species of Methylacidimicrobium gen. nov. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 6782–6791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Whittenbury, R.; Phillips, K.C.; Wilkinson, J.F. Enrichment, Isolation and Some Properties of Methane-utilizing Bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1970, 61, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bowman, J. The methanotrophs – the families Methylococcaceae and Methylocystaceae. In The Prokaryotes; Dworkin, M., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 266–289. ISBN 0387307435. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bowman, J.P. Methylosinus. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria; Whitman, W.B., Rainey, F., Kämpfer, P., Trujillo, M., Chun, J., DeVos, P., Hedlund, B., Dedysh, S., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; ISBN 9781118960608. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bowman, J.P. Methylocystis. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria; Whitman, W.B., Rainey, F., Kämpfer, P., Trujillo, M., Chun, J., DeVos, P., Hedlund, B., Dedysh, S., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; ISBN 9781118960608. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bowman, J.P.; Sly, L.T.; Nichols, P.D.; Hayward, A.C. Revised taxonomy of the methanotrophs: Description of Methylobacter gen. nov., emendation of Methylococcus, validation of Methylosinus and Methylocystis species, and a proposal that the family Methylococcaceae includes only the group I methanotrophs. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1993, 43, 735–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wartiainen, I.; Hestnes, A.G.; McDonald, I.R.; Svenning, M.M. Methylocystis rosea sp. nov., a novel methanotrophic bacterium from Arctic wetland soil, Svalbard, Norway (78° N). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Dedysh, S.N.; Belova, S.E.; Bodelier, P.L.E.; Smirnova, K.V.; Khmelenina, V.N.; Chidthaisong, A.; Trotsenko, Y.A.; Liesack, W.; Dunfiel, P.F. Methylocystis heyeri sp. nov., a novel type II methanotrophic bacterium possessing “signature” fatty acids of type I methanotrophs. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lindner, A.S.; Pacheco, A.; Aldrich, H.C.; Staniec, A.C.; Uz, I.; Hodson, D.J. Methylocystis hirsuta sp. nov., a novel methanotroph isolated from a groundwater aquifer. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 1891–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Belova, S.E.; Kulichevskaya, I.S.; Bodelier, P.L.E.; Dedysh, S.N. Methylocystis bryophila sp. nov., a facultatively methanotrophic bacterium from acidic Sphagnum peat, and emended description of the genus Methylocystis (ex Whittenbury et al. 1970) Bowman et al. 1993. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 1096–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Auman, A.J.; Stolyar, S.; Costello, A.M.; Lidstrom, M.E. Molecular characterization of methanotrophic isolates from freshwater lake sediment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 5259–5266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Heyer, J.; Galschenko, V.F.; Dunfield, P.F. Molecular phylogeny of type II methane-oxidizing bacteria isolated from various environments. Microbiology 2002, 148, 2831–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Dunfield, P.F.; Yimga, M.T.; Dedysh, S.N.; Berger, U.; Liesack, W.; Heyer, J. Isolation of a Methylocystis strain containing a novel pmoA-like gene. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2002, 41, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Reuß, J.; Rachel, R.; Kämpfer, P.; Rabenstein, A.; Küver, J.; Dröge, S.; König, H. Isolation of methanotrophic bacteria from termite gut. Microbiol. Res. 2015, 179, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. McDonald, I.R.; Murrell, J.C. The particulate methane monooxygenase gene pmo A and its use as a functional gene probe for methanotrophs. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1997, 156, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Horz, H.-P.; Yimga, M.T.; Liesack, W. Detection of Methanotroph Diversity on Roots of Submerged Rice Plants by Molecular Retrieval of pmoA, mmoX, mxaF, and 16S rRNA and Ribosomal DNA, Including pmoA-Based Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Profiling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 4177–4185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Knief, C.; Lipski, A.; Dunfield, P.F. Diversity and Activity of Methanotrophic Bacteria. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 6703–6714. [Google Scholar]
  26. Knief, C.; Kolb, S.; Bodelier, P.L.E.; Lipski, A.; Dunfield, P.F. The active methanotrophic community in hydromorphic soils changes in response to changing methane concentration. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 321–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, Y.; Dumont, M.G.; Cebron, A.; Murrell, J.C. Identification of active methanotrophs in a landfill cover soil through detection of expression of 16S rRNA and functional genes. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 2855–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nauer, P.A.; Dam, B.; Liesack, W.; Zeyer, J.; Schroth, M.H. Activity and diversity of methane-oxidizing bacteria in glacier forefields on siliceous and calcareous bedrock. Biogeosciences 2012, 9, 2259–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Knief, C. Diversity and habitat preferences of cultivated and uncultivated aerobic methanotrophic bacteria evaluated based on pmoA as molecular marker. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Murrell, J.C.; Radajewski, S. Cultivation-independent techniques for studying methanotroph ecology. Res. Microbiol. 2000, 151, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Baani, M.; Liesack, W. Two isozymes of particulate methane monooxygenase with different methane oxidation kinetics are found in Methylocystis sp. strain SC2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10203–10208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Tavormina, P.L.; Orphan, V.J.; Kalyuzhnaya, M.G.; Jetten, M.S.M.; Klotz, M.G. A novel family of functional operons encoding methane/ammonia monooxygenase-related proteins in gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2011, 3, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kits, K.D.; Klotz, M.G.; Stein, L.Y. Methane oxidation coupled to nitrate reduction under hypoxia by the Gammaproteobacterium Methylomonas denitrificans, sp. nov. type strain FJG1. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 3219–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oshkin, I.Y.; Miroshnikov, K.K.; Dedysh, N. Draft Genome Sequence of Methylocystis heyeri H2T, a Methanotroph with Habitat-Specific Adaptations, Isolated from a Peatland Ecosystem. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2019, 8, e00454-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Gorrie, C.L.; Holt, K.E. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Dam, B.; Dam, S.; Kube, M.; Reinhardt, R.; Liesack, W. Complete genome sequence of Methylocystis sp. strain SC2, an aerobic methanotroph with high-affinity methane oxidation potential. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 6008–6009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Han, D.; Dedysh, S.N.; Liesack, W. Unusual Genomic Traits Suggest Methylocystis bryophila S285 to Be Well Adapted for Life in Peatlands. Genome Biol. Evol. 2018, 10, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Heil, J.R.; Lynch, M.D.J.; Cheng, J.; Matysiakiewicz, O.; D’Alessio, M.; Charles, T.C. The Completed PacBio Single-Molecule Real-Time Sequence of Methylosinus trichosporium Strain OB3b Reveals the Presence of a Third Large Plasmid. Genome Announc. 2017, 5, e01349-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Parks, D.H.; Imelfort, M.; Skennerton, C.T.; Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015, 25, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Chaumeil, P.-A.; Mussig, A.J.; Hugenholtz, P.; Parks, D.H. GTDB-Tk: A toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 1925–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Eren, A.M.; Esen, O.C.; Quince, C.; Vineis, J.H.; Morrison, H.G.; Sogin, M.L.; Delmont, T.O. Anvi’o: An advanced analysis and visualization platformfor ’omics data. PeerJ 2015, 2015, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Contreras-Moreira, B.; Vinuesa, P. GET_HOMOLOGUES, a versatile software package for scalable and robust microbial pangenome analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 7696–7701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Li, L.; Stoeckert, C.J.J.; Roos, D.S. OrthoMCL: Identification of Ortholog Groups for Eukaryotic Genomes. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2178–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Delmont, T.O.; Eren, E.M. Linking pangenomes and metagenomes: The Prochlorococcus metapangenome. PeerJ 2018, 2018, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Tatusov, R.L.; Fedorova, N.D.; Jackson, J.D.; Jacobs, A.R.; Kiryutin, B.; Koonin, E.V.; Krylov, D.M.; Mazumder, R.; Smirnov, S.; Nikolskaya, A.N.; et al. The COG database: An updated vesion includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinform. 2003, 4, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Huerta-Cepas, J.; Forslund, K.; Coelho, L.P.; Szklarczyk, D.; Jensen, L.J.; Von Mering, C.; Bork, P. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  51. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schäffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A Software Environment for Integrated Models. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Okonechnikov, K.; Golosova, O.; Fursov, M.; Varlamov, A.; Vaskin, Y.; Efremov, I.; German Grehov, O.G.; Kandrov, D.; Rasputin, K.; Syabro, M.; et al. Unipro UGENE: A unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1166–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Sullivan, M.J.; Petty, N.K.; Beatson, S.A. Easyfig: A genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 1009–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Darling, A.E.; Mau, B.; Perna, N.T. Progressivemauve: Multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS ONE 2010, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Goris, J.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Klappenbach, J.A.; Coenye, T.; Vandamme, P.; Tiedje, J.M. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Konstantinidis, K.T.; Tiedje, J.M. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes Konstantinos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 2567–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Pritchard, L.; Glover, R.H.; Humphris, S.; Elphinstone, J.G.; Toth, I.K. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: Soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rubio, L.M.; Ludden, P.W. Maturation of Nitrogenase: A Biochemical Puzzle. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Mus, F.; Alleman, A.B.; Pence, N.; Seefeldt, L.C.; Peters, J.W. Exploring the alternatives of biological nitrogen fixation. Metallomics 2018, 10, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. McRose, D.L.; Zhang, X.; Kraepiel, A.M.L.; Morel, F.M.M. Diversity and activity of alternative nitrogenases in sequenced genomes and coastal environments. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Oshkin, I.Y.; Miroshnikov, K.K.; Danilova, O.V.; Hakobyan, A.; Liesack, W.; Dedysh, S.N. Thriving in wetlands: Ecophysiology of the spiral- shaped methanotroph Methylospira mobilis as revealed by the complete genome sequence. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Khatri, K.; Mohite, J.A.; Pandit, P.S.; Bahulikar, R.; Rahalkar, M.C. Description of ‘Ca. Methylobacter oryzae’ KRF1, a novel species from the environmentally important Methylobacter clade 2. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019, 113, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lei, S.; Pulakat, L.; Gavini, N. Activation of vanadium nitrogenase expression in Azotobacter vinelandii DJ54 revertant in the presence of molybdenum. FEBS Lett. 2000, 482, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Hu, Y.; Lee, C.C.; Ribbe, M.W. Vanadium nitrogenase: A two-hit wonder? Dalt. Trans. 2012, 41, 1118–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Lee, C.C.; Hy, Y.; Ribbe, M.W. Vanadium Nitrogenase Reduces CO. Science 2010, 329, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Putkinen, A.; Larmola, T.; Tuomivirta, T.; Siljanen, H.M.P.; Bodrossy, L.; Tuittila, E.S.; Fritze, H. Water dispersal of methanotrophic bacteria maintains functional methane oxidation in Sphagnum mosses. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Belova, S.E.; Baani, M.; Suzina, N.E.; Bodelier, P.L.E.; Liesack, W.; Dedysh, S.N. Acetate utilization as a survival strategy of peat-inhabiting Methylocystis spp. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2011, 3, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Salah Ud-Din, A.I.M.; Roujeinikova, A. Methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins: A core sensing element in prokaryotes and archaea. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 3293–3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Miroshnikov, K.K.; Belova, S.E.; Dedysh, S.N. Genomic Determinants of Phototrophy in Methanotrophic Alphaproteobacteria. Microbiology 2019, 88, 548–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Imhoff, J.F.; Rahn, T.; Künzel, S.; Neulinger, S.C. Photosynthesis is widely distributed among Proteobacteria as demonstrated by the phylogeny of PufLM reaction center proteins. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 08 00768 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenomic tree showing the positions of representatives of the genera Methylocystis and Methylosinus in relation to other alphaproteobacterial methanotrophs based on the comparative sequence analysis of 120 ubiquitous single-copy proteins. The clades composed of Methylosinus and Methylocystis species are highlighted by blue and purple, respectively. The colored circles indicate isolation sources. The tree was constructed using the Genome Taxonomy Database toolkit [41], release 04-RS89. The significance levels of interior branch points obtained in maximum-likelihood analysis were determined by bootstrap analysis (100 data re-samplings). Bootstrap values of > 70% are shown by black circles. The root (not shown) is composed of 42 genomes of gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs. Scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per amino acid position.
Figure 1. Phylogenomic tree showing the positions of representatives of the genera Methylocystis and Methylosinus in relation to other alphaproteobacterial methanotrophs based on the comparative sequence analysis of 120 ubiquitous single-copy proteins. The clades composed of Methylosinus and Methylocystis species are highlighted by blue and purple, respectively. The colored circles indicate isolation sources. The tree was constructed using the Genome Taxonomy Database toolkit [41], release 04-RS89. The significance levels of interior branch points obtained in maximum-likelihood analysis were determined by bootstrap analysis (100 data re-samplings). Bootstrap values of > 70% are shown by black circles. The root (not shown) is composed of 42 genomes of gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs. Scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per amino acid position.
Microorganisms 08 00768 g001
Microorganisms 08 00768 g002 550
Figure 2. Barplot of the pan-genome matrix.
Figure 2. Barplot of the pan-genome matrix.
Microorganisms 08 00768 g002
Microorganisms 08 00768 g003 550
Figure 3. Pan-genome analysis. Clustering of genomes based on the presence/absence patterns of 18,322 pan-genomic clusters. The genomes are organized in radial layers as core, singleton (cloud) and accessory (shell and cloud) gene clusters [Euclidean distance; Ward linkage] which are defined by the gene tree in the center. Genomes of Methylocystis and Methylosinus species are colored by purple and blue, respectively. Line segments indicate single gene clusters. The outermost circles carry the information regarding the number of genomes containing specific gene cluster, number of genes in gene clusters, maximum number of paralogs (grey circles), distribution of single-copy gene clusters (pale pink circle), functional, geometric and combined homogeneity indexes (yellow). The layers below the heatmap display from the bottom to top: total length of the genomes, GC content, genomes completion, redundancy of each genome, number of genes per kbp, number of singleton gene clusters, total number of gene clusters. Heatmap denotes correlation between the genomes based on average nucleotide identity values calculated using pyANI [58].
Figure 3. Pan-genome analysis. Clustering of genomes based on the presence/absence patterns of 18,322 pan-genomic clusters. The genomes are organized in radial layers as core, singleton (cloud) and accessory (shell and cloud) gene clusters [Euclidean distance; Ward linkage] which are defined by the gene tree in the center. Genomes of Methylocystis and Methylosinus species are colored by purple and blue, respectively. Line segments indicate single gene clusters. The outermost circles carry the information regarding the number of genomes containing specific gene cluster, number of genes in gene clusters, maximum number of paralogs (grey circles), distribution of single-copy gene clusters (pale pink circle), functional, geometric and combined homogeneity indexes (yellow). The layers below the heatmap display from the bottom to top: total length of the genomes, GC content, genomes completion, redundancy of each genome, number of genes per kbp, number of singleton gene clusters, total number of gene clusters. Heatmap denotes correlation between the genomes based on average nucleotide identity values calculated using pyANI [58].
Microorganisms 08 00768 g003
Microorganisms 08 00768 g004 550
Figure 4. Functional annotation of core, shell, and cloud genes against COG database. Genes were automatically assigned to the following COG categories: A, RNA processing and modification; B, chromatin structure and dynamics; C, energy production and conversion; D, cell cycle control and mitosis; E, amino acid metabolism and transport; F, nucleotide metabolism and transport; G, carbohydrate metabolism and transport; H, coenzyme metabolism, I, lipid metabolism; J, translation; K, transcription; L, replication and repair; M, cell wall/membrane/envelop biogenesis; N, cell motility; O, post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperone functions; P, inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Q, secondary structure; T, signal transduction; U, intracellular trafficking and secretion; Y, nuclear structure; V, defense mechanisms; Z, cytoskeleton; W, extracellular structures; X, mobilome: prophages, transposons; R, general functional prediction only; S, function unknown. The color key reflects the total number of genes in each COG category.
Figure 4. Functional annotation of core, shell, and cloud genes against COG database. Genes were automatically assigned to the following COG categories: A, RNA processing and modification; B, chromatin structure and dynamics; C, energy production and conversion; D, cell cycle control and mitosis; E, amino acid metabolism and transport; F, nucleotide metabolism and transport; G, carbohydrate metabolism and transport; H, coenzyme metabolism, I, lipid metabolism; J, translation; K, transcription; L, replication and repair; M, cell wall/membrane/envelop biogenesis; N, cell motility; O, post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperone functions; P, inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Q, secondary structure; T, signal transduction; U, intracellular trafficking and secretion; Y, nuclear structure; V, defense mechanisms; Z, cytoskeleton; W, extracellular structures; X, mobilome: prophages, transposons; R, general functional prediction only; S, function unknown. The color key reflects the total number of genes in each COG category.
Microorganisms 08 00768 g004
Microorganisms 08 00768 g005 550
Figure 5. Heatmap displaying distribution of nitrogenase-encoding genes (shown in blue) and genes encoding flagella biosynthesis (shown in orange) in the genomes of Methylocystis and Methylosinus species. The color intensity reflects the percent identity shared with the reference proteins: nitrogenase complex proteins from Mc. bryophila S285 and motility-related genes from Ms. trichosporium OB3bT.
Figure 5. Heatmap displaying distribution of nitrogenase-encoding genes (shown in blue) and genes encoding flagella biosynthesis (shown in orange) in the genomes of Methylocystis and Methylosinus species. The color intensity reflects the percent identity shared with the reference proteins: nitrogenase complex proteins from Mc. bryophila S285 and motility-related genes from Ms. trichosporium OB3bT.
Microorganisms 08 00768 g005
Microorganisms 08 00768 g006 550
Figure 6. Comparison of proteins of nitrogenase beta subunit in methanotrophic bacteria. The nitrogenase complexes of methanotrophic bacteria clustered in 4 independent groups according to the level of amino acid identity. Edges denote amino acid identity of two proteins greater than 50%. Mo-Fe nitrogenases are indicated by circles, V-Fe nitrogenases—by diamonds. Nitrogenases from members of the family Methylocystaceae are colored in red; Methylococcaceae—in cyan; Beijerinkiaceae—in purple.
Figure 6. Comparison of proteins of nitrogenase beta subunit in methanotrophic bacteria. The nitrogenase complexes of methanotrophic bacteria clustered in 4 independent groups according to the level of amino acid identity. Edges denote amino acid identity of two proteins greater than 50%. Mo-Fe nitrogenases are indicated by circles, V-Fe nitrogenases—by diamonds. Nitrogenases from members of the family Methylocystaceae are colored in red; Methylococcaceae—in cyan; Beijerinkiaceae—in purple.
Microorganisms 08 00768 g006
Microorganisms 08 00768 g007 550
Figure 7. Organization of gene clusters associated with phototrophy in the genomes of Methylocystis species in comparison to that in the genomes of the phylogenetically-related methylo- and methanotrophs. The picture shows: Methylobacterium phyllosphaerae CBMB27 (1), Mc. rosea BRCS1 (2), Mc. rosea GW6 (3), Mc. rosea SV97T (4) Methylocystis sp. Mitz-2018 (5), Methylocystis sp. SB2 (6) and Methylocapsa palsarum NE2T (7). Grey strips reflect the identity level of homologous proteins (see color code). Genes encoding photosystem II, carotenoid biosynthesis, and bacteriochlorophyll synthesis are shown in dark purple, red, and yellow, respectively. Other genes are shown in light grey.
Figure 7. Organization of gene clusters associated with phototrophy in the genomes of Methylocystis species in comparison to that in the genomes of the phylogenetically-related methylo- and methanotrophs. The picture shows: Methylobacterium phyllosphaerae CBMB27 (1), Mc. rosea BRCS1 (2), Mc. rosea GW6 (3), Mc. rosea SV97T (4) Methylocystis sp. Mitz-2018 (5), Methylocystis sp. SB2 (6) and Methylocapsa palsarum NE2T (7). Grey strips reflect the identity level of homologous proteins (see color code). Genes encoding photosystem II, carotenoid biosynthesis, and bacteriochlorophyll synthesis are shown in dark purple, red, and yellow, respectively. Other genes are shown in light grey.
Microorganisms 08 00768 g007
Table
Table 1. General features of the genomes of Methylocystis and Methylosinus species selected for the analysis. Methylocystis and Methylosinus genomes are highlighted by purple and blue, respectively.
Table 1. General features of the genomes of Methylocystis and Methylosinus species selected for the analysis. Methylocystis and Methylosinus genomes are highlighted by purple and blue, respectively.
GroupOrganismGenome AssemblySize (MB)ContigsG+C Content (mol %)ProteinsrRNAs (5S, 16S, 23S)tRNAspMMO1pMMO2sMMOpXMO
MethylocystisMc. heyeri H2TGCA_004802635.24.55163.139763, 3, 353211none
Mc. bryophila S285GCA_002117405.14.53163.241482, 2, 2472111
Mc. sp. SC2GCA_000304315.13.77163.435451,1,14621nonenone
Mc. sp. ATCC 49242GCA_000188155.34.73762.842852,2,2532nonenonenone
Mc. sp. B8GCA_005771425.13.412861.231531, 1, 14711nonenone
Mc. sp. SB2GCA_000499825.23.6415862.733921, 1, 1452nonenone1
Mc. rosea SV97TGCA_000372845.13.91462.536391,1,1482nonenone1
Mc. rosea GW6GCA_003855495.13.64162.834411,1,1482nonenone1
Mc. rosea BRCS1GCA_009685175.13.80362.734991, 1, 1492nonenone1
Mc. parvus BRCS2GCA_009685195.14.53163.441852,2,24821nonenone
Mc. parvus OBBPTGCA_000283235.14.4810863.441281, 1, 14611nonenone
Mc. hirsuta CSC1TGCA_003722355.14.21462.440361, 1, 1492none11
Mc. sp. MitZ-2018GCA_003113245.14.365562.539621, 1, 1502nonenone1
MethylosinusMs. sporium SM89AGCA_007004125.14.5916164.541551, 1, 146112none
Ms. sporium DSM 17706TGCA_003113265.13.85565.235061, 1, 141112none
Ms trichosporium OB3bTGCA_002752655.14.5165.845463, 3, 3532none1none
Ms. sp. 3S-1GCA_001675455.14.7615966.042091, 1, 1481none1none
Ms. sp. PW1GCA_000745215.15.131264.746574, 4, 558211none
Ms. sp. LW3GCA_000527115.15.09664.745023,3,352211none
Ms. sp. LW4GCA_000379125.14.821664.944523,3,353211none
Ms. sp. R-45379GCA_001644125.14.9731964.444461, 1, 1461111
Ms. sp. Ce-a6GCA_009811655.14.0911965.437241, 1, 15111nonenone
Ms. sp. C49GCA_009936375.14.71164.943173, 3, 352211none

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oshkin, I.Y.; Miroshnikov, K.K.; Grouzdev, D.S.; Dedysh, S.N. Pan-Genome-Based Analysis as a Framework for Demarcating Two Closely Related Methanotroph Genera Methylocystis and Methylosinus. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 768. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050768

AMA Style

Oshkin IY, Miroshnikov KK, Grouzdev DS, Dedysh SN. Pan-Genome-Based Analysis as a Framework for Demarcating Two Closely Related Methanotroph Genera Methylocystis and Methylosinus. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(5):768. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050768

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oshkin, Igor Y., Kirill K. Miroshnikov, Denis S. Grouzdev, and Svetlana N. Dedysh. 2020. "Pan-Genome-Based Analysis as a Framework for Demarcating Two Closely Related Methanotroph Genera Methylocystis and Methylosinus" Microorganisms 8, no. 5: 768. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050768

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop