Next Article in Journal
Hybrid Resistance and Virulence Plasmids in “High-Risk” Clones of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Including Those Carrying blaNDM-5
Next Article in Special Issue
The Intestine of Drosophila melanogaster: An Emerging Versatile Model System to Study Intestinal Epithelial Homeostasis and Host-Microbial Interactions in Humans
Previous Article in Journal
Metagenomic Evaluation of Bacterial and Fungal Assemblages Enriched within Diffusion Chambers and Microbial Traps Containing Uraniferous Soils
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 7
Issue 9
10.3390/microorganisms7090325
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Acute and Chronic Exposure to Residual Level Erythromycin on Human Intestinal Epithelium Cell Permeability and Cytotoxicity

by
Haihong Hao
1,3,
Kuppan Gokulan
1,
Silvia A. Piñeiro
2,
Katherine M. Williams
1,
Zonghui Yuan
3,
Carl E. Cerniglia
1,* and
Sangeeta Khare
1,*
1
Division of Microbiology, National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Rd, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA
2
Division of Human Food Safety, Center for Veterinary Medicine, US Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20885, USA
3
National Reference Laboratory of Veterinary Drug Residues (HZAU), College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2019, 7(9), 325; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7090325
Submission received: 1 June 2019 / Revised: 11 August 2019 / Accepted: 31 August 2019 / Published: 6 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interactions between Intestinal Epithelial Cells and Microbes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Residual concentrations of erythromycin in food could result in gastrointestinal tract exposure that potentially poses a health-hazard to the consumer, affecting intestinal epithelial permeability, barrier function, microbiota composition, and antimicrobial resistance. We investigated the effects of erythromycin after acute (48 h single treatment with 0.03 μg/mL to 300 μg/mL) or chronic (repeated treatment with 0.3 µg/mL and 300 µg/mL erythromycin for five days) exposures on the permeability of human colonic epithelial cells, a model that mimics a susceptible intestinal surface devoid of commensal microbiota. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) measurements indicated that erythromycin above 0.3 µg/mL may compromise the epithelial barrier. Acute exposure increased cytotoxicity, while chronic exposure decreased the cytotoxicity. Quantitative PCR analysis revealed that only ICAM1 (intercellular adhesion molecule 1) was up-regulated during 0.3 μg/mL acute-exposure, while ICAM1, JAM3 (junctional adhesion molecule 3), and ITGA8 (integrin alpha 8), were over-expressed in the 300 μg/mL acute treatment group. However, during chronic exposure, no change in the mRNA expression was observed at 0.3 μg/mL, and only ICAM2 was significantly up-regulated after 300 μg/mL. ICAM1 and ICAM2 are known to be involved in the formation of extracellular matrices. These gene expression changes may be related to the immunoregulatory activity of erythromycin, or a compensatory mechanism of the epithelial cells to overcome the distress caused by erythromycin due to increased permeability.

1. Introduction

Erythromycin, a member of the macrolide antimicrobials, has been widely used in humans and animals for the treatment of a number of bacterial infections for Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative cocci, besides mycoplasma infections [1,2]. Erythromycin exhibits antimicrobial as well as immunomodulatory properties [3,4]. Pharmacological studies have shown that 37–43% of orally administered erythromycin could remain in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) [5,6]. Erythromycin A and its closely related semisynthetic molecules rank among the top three antimicrobial agents used in food producing animals. In fact, erythromycin A is a commonly used medicine in poultry industry to treat chronic infections due to mycoplasma [7]. Antimicrobials, including erythromycin residues, have been detected in animal feedstuffs such as spent distillery grains from ethanol production [8]. Furthermore, the therapeutic use of erythromycins in veterinary medicine as injectables, feed additives, or in drinking water to treat, control, and prevent disease in food animals could lead to its presence as a residue in food. If withdrawal times for clearance of this antimicrobial are not strictly followed, excessive exposure to erythromycin and its metabolites to the GIT can occur, raising questions about potential effects on human health [9,10]. The PK/PD study revealed that erythromycin is metabolized into anhydroerythromycin (AHE) by gastric fluids [11]. The hydrolysis mechanism is more effective in acidic conditions compared to neutral or basic conditions. Erythromycin and AHE are differentially distributed in blood, tissue, and leukocytes during and following therapy [11]. A detectable concentration of erythromycin was present in these sites/cells 72 h after the treatment; however, the proportion of AHE becomes higher after the end of treatment. Erythromycin is metabolized in the liver through a N-demethylation process, resulting in des-N-methyl-erythromycin. AHE and other erythromycin metabolites are known to be microbiologically inactive; however, an in vitro study showed that AHE inhibits the oxidation function of Cytochrome P450 more efficiently than the erythromycin itself [12]. This inhibitory function may decrease drug clearance in the tissue, resulting in tissue accumulation, and be a mechanism for drug-induced toxicity.
Des-N-methyl-erythromycin is not excreted through urine; rather, this metabolite is absorbed by the GIT [13,14]. Moreover, the majority of the erythromycin metabolites are recovered from the GIT and feces [10]. The presence of commonly used veterinary drugs and their metabolic products in the intestinal tract may result in permeability changes in intestinal epithelial cells [15,16]. Intestinal permeability is closely related to inflammatory conditions and the invasion of pathogenic microorganisms [17,18,19,20]. While assessing the toxicity of erythromycin, the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee of Food Additives (JECFA) considered that microbiological effects, specifically disruption of the colonization barrier, were more relevant than toxicological effects for the establishment of an acceptable daily intake (ADI) for erythromycin.
Intestinal microbial populations maintain gastrointestinal homeostasis and limit epithelial permeability [21]. Current evidence suggests that increased permeability of the gut due to perturbation of the intestinal microbiota by xenobiotics may prompt cycles of intestinal inflammation and could be linked to many conditions, including Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, Type I diabetes, irritable bowel syndrome, GIT infections, celiac disease, and graft-versus-host disease [17,22]. Intestinal permeability is mainly regulated by proteins associated with epithelial cell junctions. These proteins can link epithelial cells together into a functional barrier, capable of blocking the passage of microorganisms and larger molecules while allowing absorption of water and nutrients [17,18].
The purpose of this study was to assess the in vitro effects of residual concentrations of erythromycin on the intestinal epithelial layer using T84 cells, a human colorectal carcinoma cell line. We investigated using a comprehensive methodological approach that included transepithelial electrical resistance (TER), cytotoxicity, and mRNA expression levels to determine the key genes involved in intestinal integrity after exposure to erythromycin. To our knowledge, this is the first study using the T84 cell line to evaluate the potential effects of residual amounts of erythromycin on human intestinal epithelial cells. In this research, monolayers of T84 cells were incubated with a range of erythromycin concentrations (0.03 μg/mL to 300 μg/mL) that included a residual dose (0.3 μg/mL) and a high dose (300 μg/mL) [23] to evaluate changes in paracellular permeability and cell toxicity.

2. Material and Method

2.1. Cell Culture

T84 cells (ATCC CCL-248™), a human colorectal carcinoma cell line, were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). Complete growth media was composed of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)/F-12 media with L-glutamine and HEPES (both ATCC), and supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), fungizone, and penicillin/streptomycin as described earlier [16]. Cells were grown in complete media using 75 cm2 cell culture flasks until approximately 70–80% confluent and then split using 0.25% Trypsin–EDTA into desired vessels. Cell cultures were maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and 95% humidity.

2.2. Transwell Model and Transepithelial Electrical Resistance (TER) Measurement

T84 cells were seeded onto 6.5 mm collagen-coated transwell inserts (Corning, NY, USA) at a concentration of 2.0 × 105 cells/well. Cell monolayers were grown for 5–10 days. Once TER of cell monolayers reached approximately 800–1000 Ω, antimicrobial free media was exchanged twice to apical and basal reservoirs. Measurement of TER was performed according to methods established previously [16,24,25,26,27]. TER readings were taken using a STX electrode probe and EVOM2 Epithelial Voltammeter (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, USA). Once TER of polarized cell monolayers again reached approximately 800–1000 Ω, media was changed, and cells were equilibrated for 3 h. Baseline TER control readings were taken before starting the acute or chronic exposure to erythromycin.

2.3. Acute Exposure of Erythromycin

Erythromycin was dissolved in ethanol; and the final concentration of ethanol in the treatment media was below 1.5%. Cells treated with media containing 1.5% ethanol served as control. Polarized cells were exposed to single dose of erythromycin (0.03 μg/mL to 300 μg/mL) for 48 h. This dose range included the erythromycin concentration above, below, and at residual concentration exposure levels [16,23]. The JECFA established an ADI of 0–0.7 µg/kg bw erythromycin concentration, based on microbiological effects, as more relevant concentration/dose used for risk assessment with microbiota than the toxicological endpoints [6]. Based on the TER results (as described below), subsequent experiments were performed with only 0.3 and 300 μg/mL. To assess changes in epithelial cells resistance, TER readings were taken at 0, 1, 3, 24, and 48 h post-exposure. TER measurements are presented as fold of original baseline value (measured before addition of erythromycin or controls) and statistical data analysis was performed using Sigma Plot (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA).

2.4. Chronic Exposure of Erythromycin

For the chronic treatment, cell monolayers were treated with 0, 0.3, and 300 μg/mL erythromycin daily for 5 days. Medium was replaced with fresh medium containing erythromycin (0, 0.3, and 300 μg/mL) each day. Drug treatment was performed after 3 h equilibration (to avoid any fluctuation due to the change in the media) and TER measurements were taken at 0, 1, 3, 20, and 22 h post-exposure every day. TER measurements and statistical data analysis was performed the same way as with single treatment.

2.5. Cytotoxicity Assay

Supernatants from the apical and basal compartments of each transwell were collected to assess the cell cytotoxicity. The CytoTox 96® Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay was performed using the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). This assay measures lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a stable cytosolic enzyme released upon cell lysis. Released LDH in culture supernatants was measured through a 30-minute coupled enzymatic assay, which results in conversion of a tetrazolium salt (INT) into a red formazan product. The amount of color formed is proportional to the number of lysed cells. Visible wavelength absorbance (OD490) data were collected using a standard 96-well plate reader (Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT, USA).

2.6. qPCR Analysis of Genes Involved in the Cellular Integrity

mRNA was extracted from the cells attached to the transwell membrane using the PARIS kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop® ND-1000 (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE, USA). Extracted RNA was treated with the Turbo DNA-free kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). mRNA was reverse transcribed to make cDNA using the Two-Step Reverse Transcription TaqMan kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Gene expression analysis of 84 cell junction-related genes was examined using the RT2 Profiler PCR Array Human Cell Junction Pathway Finder (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Plates were analyzed using an ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR system (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), with amplification conducted with an initial 10-minutes step at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. One independent sample was used for each plate and three plates (mRNA obtained from three independent experiments) were run for each experimental group. Data was analyzed using the web-based Qiagen data analysis tool, and using β-ACT, β2 M, GAPDH, HPRT1, and RPLP0 housekeeping genes. Data from T84 cells treated with 0.3 and 300 μg/mL erythromycin were individually compared to control cells. Changes in gene expression for RT2 Profiler plates were evaluated by Student’s t test [28]. Genes with p < 0.05 were designated as significant.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Acute Exposure on Epithelial Cells Permeability

Figure 1 shows that the untreated control cells revealed a healthy cell status as the TER increased slowly and steadily. At the 24 h time point there was no difference in TER value between control and erythromycin treated cells. The lowest concentration of erythromycin (0.03 μg/mL) did not reveal any changes in the TER during the entire 48 h period. In contrast, at 48 h time point, erythromycin 300 μg/mL and 0.3 μg/mL treated wells showed significant decrease (p < 0.05) in TER as compared to control, indicating that the erythromycin may increase permeability of the cell layer. The residue concentration (0.3 μg/mL) and a concentration known to be toxic to cells (300 μg/mL) were selected to assess the effect of single treatment on the expression of mRNA genes related to epithelial permeability.

3.2. Effect of Chronic Exposure on Epithelial Permeability

The TER following chronic erythromycin exposure was tested to assess the changes in the intestinal epithelial cell permeability. For chronic exposure, media of the T84 cells grown on transwells was replaced daily with respective treatment condition (media containing erythromycin 0.3 μg/mL and 300 μg/mL) for five days. After chronic daily exposure to 0.3 and 300 μg/mL doses for five days, the changes in cell layer TER were much more dramatic, with significant increases in permeability observed after two days of exposure (Figure 2). When compared with the control epithelial cells, exposure to erythromycin at both concentrations resulted in >2-fold TER suppression after five days of treatment, indicating long-term treatment with erythromycin could increase permeability. The result showed that erythromycin causes TER suppression from day three onwards. The highest concentration of erythromycin induced the highest level of TER suppression that was statistically significant.

3.3. Effect of Acute Erythromycin Exposure on Cell Cytotoxicity

The culture medium was collected from the basal and apical transwell compartments, and cell cytotoxicity was assessed by measuring the LDH. The results showed no difference in the LDH concentration in the basal compartment between control cells and cells treated with two different concentrations of erythromycin (data not shown). In contrast, as shown in Figure 3, in the apical compartment cell culture supernatants, the released LDH was significantly increased after 48 h single treatment of 0.3 and 300 μg/mL erythromycin (p < 0.05), indicating that these two concentrations resulted in more cell lysis than that in the drug free control.

3.4. Effect of Chronic Erythromycin Exposure on Cytotoxicity

During the chronic exposure, there was no significant difference of the OD490 value in the media collected from the basal suspension (data not shown). Within the erythromycin-free controls, LDH release increased in the culture supernatants collected from the apical compartment over the five day culture interval. The daily exposure of T84 cells to 0.3 μg/mL erythromycin did not result in significant change of LDH during the five days as compared with controls. However, when the cells were treated daily with 300 μg/mL erythromycin, LDH release increased in the first two days but decreased the next two days (Figure 4). Compared to the drug free treatment, significant difference was observed in day four after daily treatment of 300 μg/mL erythromycin (p < 0.05).

3.5. Impact of Acute Exposure on Expression of Human Cell Junction Genes

T84 epithelial cell monolayers were evaluated for changes in gene expression resulting from exposure to erythromycin. Effects of 48 h exposure to erythromycin (0.3 and 300 μg/mL) were evaluated using a PCR array plate with 84 genes related to cell junctions and permeability. Several genes were differentially regulated during erythromycin treatment (Table 1). Genes with significant changes in expression were those with p < 0.05 when compared to control. Overall, the expression of only three genes was significantly changed in both groups (p < 0.05). Treatment with 0.3 μg/mL erythromycin only resulted in significant changes (about two-fold) in one gene, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1). Following exposure to 300 μg/mL erythromycin, T84 cells demonstrated up-regulation of ICAM1, junctional adhesion molecule 3 (JAM3), and integrin alpha 8 (ITGA8). Of those genes, ITGA8 showed the greatest changes in expression, with a 175-fold increase. Additionally, exposure to 0.3 μg/mL and 300 μg/mL erythromycin resulted in altered expression of genes encoding caveolin (CAV1/3), cadherin (CDH2), claudin (CLDN10/11/14/17/18/19), desmocollin (DSC1/3), gap junction proteins (GJA1/3/5, GJB4/5/6, GJC3), integrin (ITGA4/7, ITGAM), and notch (NOTCH4), with more than two-fold changes that could be biologically significant, but were not significant statistically.

3.6. Impact of Chronic Exposure of Erythromycin on the Expression of Human Cell Junction Genes

No genes were significantly changed after five days of treatment by 0.3 μg/mL erythromycin (Table 2). Only one gene, ICAM2, was significantly up-regulated (p < 0.05) when exposed to 300 μg/mL erythromycin for five days (Table 2). However, the ICAM2 up-regulation was less than a two fold. The chronic treatment by 0.3 μg/mL and 300 μg/mL erythromycin resulted in different expression of genes encoding caveolin (CAV3), claudin (CLDN8/10/14/17/18/19), desmocollin (DSC1), desmoglein (DSG3), gap junction proteins (GJA5, GJB6, GJC2), and integrin (ITGA4, ITGAM, ITGB3), with more than a two-fold change. Of those genes, the CAV3, CLDN14, CLDN17, DSC1, ITGA4, and ITGB3 were down-regulated, while the CLDN18, CLDN19, DSG3, GJA5, GJB6 were up-regulated, after treatment by both 0.3 μg/mL and 300 μg/mL erythromycin. However, while the observed changes might have been biologically significant, they were not significant statistically.

4. Discussion

Despite reports of several therapeutic dose-related side effects, including gastrointestinal disturbances, erythromycin is widely used in human and veterinary medicine to combat certain bacterial infections. Risk assessment of an antibiotic is conducted by determining the potential of intestinal barrier disruption with an emphasis on the effect on commensal microbial population and development of resistance against antimicrobial drug. Another aspect of intestinal barrier disruption is the direct effect of residual antibiotic on the integrity of intestinal epithelial cells, especially, as some of the antibiotics stay in the intestine for more than 48 h. One of the most important functions of the gastrointestinal epithelium, and supporting elements such as the mucus layer, defensins and the commensal bacteria residing on the intestinal mucosa, is to function as a physical and biochemical barrier between the luminal contents and the interior of the human body [17,29,30]. As such, epithelial integrity can serve as an indicator of overall gastrointestinal health. Several studies have shown that the bacterial cell wall ultrastructure, cell membrane permeability, morphology, and ability to form bacterial biofilms are affected during antimicrobial treatment [31,32,33,34]. There is a knowledge gap in describing the effects of residual amounts of antimicrobial agents on intestinal epithelial cells. Moreover, our group recently described the effects of acute (single) exposure to residual levels of tetracycline on the barrier functions of human intestinal epithelial cells [16]. The present study is an in vitro approach to assess whether an acute (single) or chronic (repeated for five days) exposure to residual levels of erythromycin has any adverse effects on intestinal epithelial cells.
Acute use of erythromycin was monitored for 48 h after single treatment with erythromycin above, below, and at residual concentrations, whereas, the chronic use of erythromycin was replicated by replacing culture media with fresh media containing erythromycin daily for five days. The acute exposure reflected the interaction of a residual amount of erythromycin as a one-time event, and the chronic exposure reflected the exposure of a residual amount of erythromycin daily for five days. In terms of exposure to consumers ingesting erythromycin it reflects occasional or daily consumption of edible products with residual amounts of erythromycin, respectively.
During acute treatment, a biphasic effect of erythromycin was noticed; at lower concentrations no change (0.03 μg/mL) or a decrease (0.3 μg/mL) in the TER was seen. However, at subsequent concentrations an increase in TER (3 μg/mL) or almost no change in TER (30 and 300 μg/mL) was noticed. These observations could be also correlated with the erythromycin having a biphasic effect on migrating motor complex (MMC—housekeeper of the GIT) cycle on the stomach and small intestine [35]. This biphasic effect of erythromycin on MMC is proposed to be due to its agonist activity towards motilin, a gastroprokinetic hormone [35,36,37]. Another agonist of motilin (mitemcinal) also showed nonlinear pharmacokinetics [36]. It is well known that many drugs (orally administered) are absorbed by intestinal epithelial cells and attain systemic circulation after passage through the liver via portal veins. The membrane permeability in gastrointestinal epithelial cells (first-pass metabolism) contributes to the nonlinear pharmacokinetics in animals and humans [36]. Thus, intestinal epithelial cell model provides an [35] in vitro platform to test the first pass metabolism of orally administered drugs.
An increase in LDH release (cytotoxicity effect) was observed following 48 h exposure to erythromycin concentrations above 0.3 μg/mL. Due to the increased permeability (decreased TER) of the epithelial cells, an erythromycin concentration above 0.3 μg/mL may pass from the apical compartment of the transwell to the basal compartment without providing optimal time for the interaction of the drug with epithelial cells. Thus, subsequent experiments were conducted using 0.3 μg/mL and 300 μg/mL concentrations only. During the chronic treatment, significant increases in the intestinal cell epithelium permeability were observed and were accompanied by an increase in LDH release (initial two days) followed by a decrease in LDH release or cytotoxic effects during an additional two days exposure to 0.3 μg/mL and 300 μg/mL erythromycin. The LDH activity measured in the supernatant reflects the stable cytosolic enzyme released upon cell lysis. For a five day experiment, the daily change in the media would result in the proliferation of cells. However, there is also spontaneous cell lysis which could reflect higher LDH. In addition, erythromycin is a known inhibitor of cell proliferation [38,39,40]. It may be the reason for lower levels of LDH during repeated treatment of erythromycin (chronic treatment). Compared to acute exposure, chronic exposure of erythromycin resulted in more substantial effects on the intestinal epithelium. The T84 cells grew faster when fresh medium was replaced daily and, therefore, the TER value of the cells without erythromycin kept increasing even after five days; however, the daily exposure of erythromycin to epithelial cells inhibited the growth and attachment of the cells.
Erythromycin acts as an inhibitor of intestinal sugar and amino acid (e.g., L-threonine and D-galactose) transportation and absorption [41,42,43]. Another macrolide class antimicrobial agent, rapamycin, slows down the proliferation of intestinal stem cells in the aging gut and induces autophagy in the intestinal epithelium [44]. Thus, we believe that the effect of erythromycin on the human intestinal epithelium observed in our study may be due to the role of erythromycin on suppressing the proliferation of intestinal cells.
Only one gene, ICAM1, encoding intercellular adhesion molecule 1 was significantly up-regulated in the single treatment with 0.3 μg/mL erythromycin. ICAM1 and two other genes, JAM3, encoding junctional adhesion molecule 3, and ITGA8, encoding integrin alpha 8, were over-expressed in the single treatment with 300 μg/mL erythromycin. ICAM1 is known to be involved in the formation of extracellular matrices [45]; thus, it is presumed that a higher concentration of erythromycin may damage the epithelial barrier, which could result in the passing of erythromycin into the basal media. The higher expression of ICAM1 is a repair mechanism of the epithelial cells.
No significant changes in gene expression were observed after chronic-treatment with 0.3 μg/mL erythromycin. Only ICAM2 was up-regulated after chronic treatment with 300 μg/mL erythromycin, but with less than a two-fold change (p < 0.01).
ICAM1, along with ICAM2 and JAM3, play an important role in formation of extracellular matrices, as well as in tight junctions between epithelial cells. Tight junctions are crucial for the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity. An earlier study found that ICAM1 can be up-regulated in the less differentiated cell line T84 by interferon-gamma and interleukin 1β [46]. This form of gene activation can be ruled out in this study, as the control cells did not show an increase in ICAM1 gene expression. Tight junctions seal adjacent epithelial cells together, preventing the passage of most dissolved molecules as well as membrane-bound lipids and proteins between the apical and basolateral epithelial surfaces [47]. In the present study, the increased expression of these genes may be a mechanism by which epithelial cells are trying to protect themselves against the opening of the sealed tight junctions; however, integrity of the epithelial junction between cells depends on the coordinated interplay between several genes—a compensatory mechanism which in this study seems to be overcome by erythromycin treatment that leads to an increase in the TER. In an earlier report, in vivo studies showed that the involvement of ICAM1 under pathologic conditions could increase accumulation of epithelial-associated neutrophils [48]. Moreover, epithelial ICAM1 has an important role in the activation of epithelial Akt and β-catenin signaling, and neutrophils within the intestinal lumen are known to regulate epithelial homeostasis [49]. Even a subtle disruption of the ICAM-1/2 gradient may prevent migration of immune cells and inflammatory responses [50]. Considering the process of “egression” of immune cells at the intestinal epithelial layer, higher expression of ICAM1 or ICAM2 may initiate an inflammatory process during acute or chronic exposure to erythromycin. Another major component of tight junctions in epithelial cells are JAMs [51]. JAM3 was identified as the counter-receptor of JAM2 and leukocyte integrin Mac-1 [52,53]. It is also a component of desmosomes and a ligand for CD11b/CD18-mediated neutrophil trans-epithelial migration [54,55,56]. Previous studies highlighted an unexpected function for JAM3 in controlling epithelial cell conversion from a static, polarized state to a pro-migratory phenotype [57,58]. It could be plausible that exposure to erythromycin may be changing the IEC polarization to a similar pro-migrating phenotype.
ITGA8 was up-regulated in IECs during the acute exposure to erythromycin at the highest concentration. ITGA8 plays an important role in focal adhesion. ITGA8 is a receptor for fibronectin, vitronectin, tenascin-C fragments, osteopontin, and nephronectin [59,60,61], and has been shown to promote attachment of K562 cells and mesangial cells on fibronectin and vitronectin [59,62]. Previous studies suggested that ITGA8 is important for maintaining integrity of the glomerular capillary tuft [63], regulating cell attachment and migration [62,64], regulating cell growth and survival [65,66], and attenuating proliferation and apoptosis [45,67,68]. The significantly higher up-regulation of ITGA8 during acute exposure to high erythromycin dose clearly indicates that the IEC are trying to maintain homeostasis of the epithelial integrity by similar mechanisms. Moreover, cells exposed to the highest erythromycin concentrations showed same level of cytotoxicity as the residual level, which further confirms that the increased expression of ITGA8 may be involved in the attenuation of the cell death. The acute exposure of erythromycin to IECs resulted in the up-regulation of genes involved in the function of tight junctions and focal adhesions, a possible indication that the epithelial cells were attempting to compensate for the increased permeability by enhanced expression of genes involved in maintaining cell–cell adhesion. The up-regulation of these three genes may also be related to the anti-inflammatory effects and immune-regulatory activity of erythromycin in human intestinal epithelial cells [69,70,71]. Thus, it could be postulated that the acute exposure of residual erythromycin may result in the induction of protective responses in healthy individuals.
Therapeutic doses of macrolide drugs (e.g., erythromycin, azithromycin, and roxithromycin) modulate immune responses in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) and CD4+ T cells, suppress DC-induced allogeneic T-cell proliferation and cytokine production [69,70,71,72,73], and significantly decrease neutrophil and monocyte trans-endothelial migration [74]. Roxithromycin can also inhibit nuclear factor kappa-β signaling and endoplasmic reticulum stress in intestinal epithelial cells, and ameliorate experimental colitis in mice [75]. Erythromycin has a possible role in disrupting the signaling pathway that regulates nuclear factor-kappa-β activation [76,77,78]. The possibility of erythromycin to cause more adverse effects by conversion to AHE is beyond the scope of this study. Moreover, the expression of CYP3A4 by T84 cells is controversial [38,39,40]. Though it is beyond the scope of this current study, it would be very interesting to see the effects of residual doses of erythromycin in an animal model.
Apart from addressing the knowledge-gap regarding impact of residual erythromycin on intestinal permeability, this study also addresses a major lacuna in the area of transfer of antibiotic through breastmilk to infant and its relationship to intestinal health. Due to the low levels of erythromycin in breastmilk it is acceptable to use in nursing mothers [79,80]. Average erythromycin levels in the breastmilk after two hours of oral or intravenous exposure to nursing mothers were found to be 1 μg/mL and 2.5 μg/mL, respectively [81,82]. The lower amount of erythromycin in the breast milk of females that took oral medication may be due to the biotransformation of drug by intestinal bacteria [83]. Pyloric stenosis, vomiting, and poor weight gain, along with some other medical conditions were hypothesized to be related to erythromycin in breastmilk [84]. Our study also provides a research model to understand the mechanism of these intestinal disturbances if infants are exposed to erythromycin exposure via breast milk.

5. Conclusions

This study used a comprehensive approach to evaluate the effects of exposure to erythromycin on intestinal permeability, cytotoxicity, and expression of related genes in an in vitro model of the human intestinal epithelium. Exposure to erythromycin resulted in increased intestinal permeability at both the residue (0.3 μg/mL) and high-level (300 μg/mL) concentrations tested. The increase in intestinal permeability appeared to be positively correlated with cytotoxic effects after acute treatment, while negatively correlated with cytotoxicity effects after chronic treatment. The changes in intestinal permeability and cytotoxicity may be due to the role of erythromycin in suppressing the proliferation of intestinal cells. The exposure to erythromycin, especially at the higher concentration, could up-regulate genes associated with tight junctions and focal adhesions. This study opens the door for future challenging experiments using in vivo, ex vivo, or organ-on-a chip models of the human GIT to determine the potential adverse effects following chronic or long-term human exposure to antimicrobial residues in foods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: H.H., K.G., S.A.P., C.E.C. and S.K.; methodology: H.H., K.G., K.M.W. and S.K.; data analysis: H.H., K.G., and S.K.; writing—original draft preparation: H.H., K.G., K.M.W. and S.K.; writing—review and editing: H.H., K.G., S.A.P., K.M.W., Z.Y., C.E.C. and S.K.; supervision, funding acquisition and project administration: C.E.C, S.K.

Funding

This research was funded by United States-Food and Drug Administration.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank H. Harbottle, Jeffrey Gilbert, and Kevin Greenlees from the Center for Veterinary Medicine, US-FDA for critically reviewing the manuscript. H. Hao and Katherine Williams were the participants of the ORISE program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. The findings and conclusions presented in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Food and Drug Administration.

References

  1. Kibwage, I.O.; Hoogmartens, J.; Roets, E.; Vanderhaeghe, H.; Verbist, L.; Dubost, M.; Pascal, C.; Petitjean, P.; Levol, G. Antibacterial activities of erythromycins a, b, c, and d and some of their derivatives. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1985, 28, 630–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Morimoto, S.; Nagate, T.; Sugita, K.; Ono, T.; Numata, K.; Miyachi, J.; Misawa, Y.; Yamada, K.; Omura, S. Chemical modification of erythromycins. III. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of new semisynthetic 6-o-methylerythromycins a, te-031 (clarithromycin) and te-032. J. Antibiot. 1990, 43, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cramer, C.L.; Patterson, A.; Alchakaki, A.; Soubani, A.O. Immunomodulatory indications of azithromycin in respiratory disease: A concise review for the clinician. Postgrad. Med. 2017, 129, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Parnham, M.J.; Erakovic Haber, V.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J.; Perletti, G.; Verleden, G.M.; Vos, R. Azithromycin: Mechanisms of action and their relevance for clinical applications. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 143, 225–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kim, Y.H.; Heinze, T.M.; Kim, S.J.; Cerniglia, C.E. Adsorption and clay-catalyzed degradation of erythromycin a on homoionic clays. J. Environ. Qual. 2004, 33, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. JECFA: Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee On Food Additives. Evaluation of Certain Veterinary Drug Residues in Food: Sixty-Sixth Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives; WHO Technical Report Series; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006; pp. 1–80. [Google Scholar]
  7. EMEA. Committee for veterinary medicinal products erythromycin, summary report (2). In The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products Veterinary Medicines and Information Technology Unit; European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products: London, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ge, B.; Domesle, K.J.; Yang, Q.; Young, S.R.; Rice-Trujillo, C.L.; Bodeis Jones, S.M.; Gaines, S.A.; Keller, M.W.; Li, X.; Pineiro, S.A.; et al. Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Camilleri, M.; Parkman, H.P.; Shafi, M.A.; Abell, T.L.; Gerson, L.; American College of Gastroenterology. Clinical guideline: Management of gastroparesis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 108, 18–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lebel, M. Pharmacokinetic properties of clarithromycin: A comparison with erythromycin and azithromycin. Can. J. Infect. Dis. 1993, 4, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Krasniqi, S.; Matzneller, P.; Kinzig, M.; Sorgel, F.; Huttner, S.; Lackner, E.; Muller, M.; Zeitlinger, M. Blood, tissue, and intracellular concentrations of erythromycin and its metabolite anhydroerythromycin during and after therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 1059–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stupans, I.; Sansom, L.N. The inhibition of drug oxidation by anhydroerythromycin, an acid degradation product of erythromycin. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1991, 42, 2085–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mate, L.; Virkel, G.; Lifschitz, A.; Sallovitz, J.; Ballent, M.; Lanusse, C. Phase 1 and phase 2 metabolic activities along the small intestine in adult male sheep. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010, 33, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pineau, T.; Galtier, P.; Bonfils, C.; Derancourt, J.; Maurel, P. Purification of a sheep liver cytochrome p-450 from the p450iiia gene subfamily. Its contribution to the n-dealkylation of veterinary drugs. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1990, 39, 901–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sato, H.; Zhang, L.S.; Martinez, K.; Chang, E.B.; Yang, Q.; Wang, F.; Howles, P.N.; Hokari, R.; Miura, S.; Tso, P. Antibiotics suppress activation of intestinal mucosal mast cells and reduce dietary lipid absorption in sprague-dawley rats. Gastroenterology 2016, 151, 923–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gokulan, K.; Cerniglia, C.E.; Thomas, C.; Pineiro, S.A.; Khare, S. Effects of residual levels of tetracycline on the barrier functions of human intestinal epithelial cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 109, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Odenwald, M.A.; Turner, J.R. Intestinal permeability defects: Is it time to treat? Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 11, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Barreau, F.; Hugot, J.P. Intestinal barrier dysfunction triggered by invasive bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2014, 17, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kerr, C.A.; Grice, D.M.; Tran, C.D.; Bauer, D.C.; Li, D.; Hendry, P.; Hannan, G.N. Early life events influence whole-of-life metabolic health via gut microflora and gut permeability. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 41, 326–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Thevaranjan, N.; Puchta, A.; Schulz, C.; Naidoo, A.; Szamosi, J.C.; Verschoor, C.P.; Loukov, D.; Schenck, L.P.; Jury, J.; Foley, K.P.; et al. Age-Associated Microbial Dysbiosis Promotes Intestinal Permeability, Systemic Inflammation, and Macrophage Dysfunction. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 21, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Odenwald, M.A.; Turner, J.R. The intestinal epithelial barrier: A therapeutic target? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Caruso, R.; Fina, D.; Paoluzi, O.A.; Del Vecchio Blanco, G.; Stolfi, C.; Rizzo, A.; Caprioli, F.; Sarra, M.; Andrei, F.; Fantini, M.C.; et al. Il-23-mediated regulation of il-17 production in helicobacter pylori-infected gastric mucosa. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008, 38, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Carman, R.J.; Simon, M.A.; Petzold, H.E., 3rd; Wimmer, R.F.; Batra, M.R.; Fernandez, A.H.; Miller, M.A.; Bartholomew, M. Antibiotics in the human food chain: Establishing no effect levels of tetracycline, neomycin, and erythromycin using a chemostat model of the human colonic microflora. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2005, 43, 168–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Youakim, A.; Ahdieh, M. Interferon-gamma decreases barrier function in t84 cells by reducing zo-1 levels and disrupting apical actin. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 276, G1279–G1288. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Bruewer, M.; Luegering, A.; Kucharzik, T.; Parkos, C.A.; Madara, J.L.; Hopkins, A.M.; Nusrat, A. Proinflammatory cytokines disrupt epithelial barrier function by apoptosis-independent mechanisms. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 6164–6172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Khare, S.; Lawhon, S.D.; Drake, K.L.; Nunes, J.E.; Figueiredo, J.F.; Rossetti, C.A.; Gull, T.; Everts, R.E.; Lewin, H.A.; Galindo, C.L.; et al. Systems biology analysis of gene expression during in vivo mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis enteric colonization reveals role for immune tolerance. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Williams, K.M.; Gokulan, K.; Cerniglia, C.E.; Khare, S. Size and dose dependent effects of silver nanoparticle exposure on intestinal permeability in an in vitro model of the human gut epithelium. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2016, 14, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time pcr data by the comparative ct method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Selsted, M.E.; Miller, S.I.; Henschen, A.H.; Ouellette, A.J. Enteric defensins: antibiotic peptide components of intestinal host defense. J. Cell Biol. 1992, 118, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pastorelli, L.; De Salvo, C.; Mercado, J.R.; Vecchi, M.; Pizarro, T.T. Central role of the gut epithelial barrier in the pathogenesis of chronic intestinal inflammation: Lessons learned from animal models and human genetics. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Craft, K.M.; Gaddy, J.A.; Townsend, S.D. Human milk oligosaccharides sensitize group b streptococcus to clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamycin, and minocycline on a strain specific basis. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 13, 2020–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Takahashi, E.; Indalao, I.L.; Sawabuchi, T.; Mizuno, K.; Sakai, S.; Kimoto, T.; Kim, H.; Kido, H. Clarithromycin suppresses induction of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 and improves pathological changes in the lungs and heart of mice infected with influenza a virus. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 56, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, P.; Chen, Y.; Lu, Q.; Qin, H.; Ou, H.; He, B.; Ye, J. Cellular metabolism network of bacillus thuringiensis related to erythromycin stress and degradation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 160, 328–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhu, X.; Liu, D.; Singh, A.K.; Drolia, R.; Bai, X.; Tenguria, S.; Bhunia, A.K. Tunicamycin mediated inhibition of wall teichoic acid affects staphylococcus aureus and listeria monocytogenes cell morphology, biofilm formation and virulence. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Otterson, M.F.; Sarna, S.K. Gastrointestinal motor effects of erythromycin. Am. J. Physiol. 1990, 259, G355–G363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Saitoh, R.; Miyayama, T.; Mitsui, T.; Akiba, Y.; Higashida, A.; Takata, S.; Kawanishi, T.; Aso, Y.; Itoh, Z.; Omura, S. Nonlinear intestinal pharmacokinetics of mitemcinal, the first acid-resistant non-peptide motilin receptor agonist, in rats. Xenobiotica 2007, 37, 1421–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Galligan, J.J.; Vanner, S. Basic and clinical pharmacology of new motility promoting agents. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2005, 17, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yamaura, Y.; Chapron, B.D.; Wang, Z.; Himmelfarb, J.; Thummel, K.E. Functional comparison of human colonic carcinoma cell lines and primary small intestinal epithelial cells for investigations of intestinal drug permeability and first-pass metabolism. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2016, 44, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Juuti-Uusitalo, K.M.; Kaukinen, K.; Maki, M.; Tuimala, J.; Kainulainen, H. Gene expression in tgfbeta-induced epithelial cell differentiation in a three-dimensional intestinal epithelial cell differentiation model. BMC Genom. 2006, 7, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bourgine, J.; Billaut-Laden, I.; Happillon, M.; Lo-Guidice, J.M.; Maunoury, V.; Imbenotte, M.; Broly, F. Gene expression profiling of systems involved in the metabolism and the disposition of xenobiotics: Comparison between human intestinal biopsy samples and colon cell lines. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2012, 40, 694–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Navarro, H.; Arruebo, M.P.; Sorribas, V.; Alcalde, A.I. Effect of erythromycin on l-threonine transport in rabbit jejunum in vitro. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 1992, 15, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alcalde, A.I.; Navarro, H.; Sorribas, V.; Marco, R. Study of the action of intramuscularly administered erythromycin on the l-threonine transport and the digestive enzymatic activity in rabbit jejunum. Life Sci. 1996, 59, 821–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Navarro, H.; Arruebo, M.P.; Alcalde, A.I.; Sorribas, V. Effect of erythromycin on d-galactose absorption and sucrase activity in rabbit jejunum. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1993, 71, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fan, X.; Liang, Q.; Lian, T.; Wu, Q.; Gaur, U.; Li, D.; Yang, D.; Mao, X.; Jin, Z.; Li, Y.; et al. Rapamycin preserves gut homeostasis during drosophila aging. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 35274–35283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Volkert, G.; Jahn, A.; Dinkel, C.; Fahlbusch, F.; Zurn, C.; Hilgers, K.F.; Rascher, W.; Hartner, A.; Marek, I. Contribution of the alpha8 integrin chain to the expression of extracellular matrix components. Cell Commun. Adhes. 2014, 21, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kaiserlian, D.; Rigal, D.; Abello, J.; Revillard, J.P. Expression, function and regulation of the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (icam-1) on human intestinal epithelial cell lines. Eur. J. Immunol. 1991, 21, 2415–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sumagin, R.; Parkos, C.A. Epithelial adhesion molecules and the regulation of intestinal homeostasis during neutrophil transepithelial migration. Tissue Barriers 2015, 3, e969100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sumagin, R.; Robin, A.Z.; Nusrat, A.; Parkos, C.A. Transmigrated neutrophils in the intestinal lumen engage icam-1 to regulate the epithelial barrier and neutrophil recruitment. Mucosal Immunol. 2014, 7, 905–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sumagin, R.; Brazil, J.C.; Nava, P.; Nishio, H.; Alam, A.; Luissint, A.C.; Weber, D.A.; Neish, A.S.; Nusrat, A.; Parkos, C.A. Neutrophil interactions with epithelial-expressed icam-1 enhances intestinal mucosal wound healing. Mucosal Immunol. 2016, 9, 1151–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Porter, J.C.; Hall, A. Epithelial icam-1 and icam-2 regulate the egression of human t cells across the bronchial epithelium. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 492–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Martin-Padura, I.; Lostaglio, S.; Schneemann, M.; Williams, L.; Romano, M.; Fruscella, P.; Panzeri, C.; Stoppacciaro, A.; Ruco, L.; Villa, A.; et al. Junctional adhesion molecule, a novel member of the immunoglobulin superfamily that distributes at intercellular junctions and modulates monocyte transmigration. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 142, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arrate, M.P.; Rodriguez, J.M.; Tran, T.M.; Brock, T.A.; Cunningham, S.A. Cloning of human junctional adhesion molecule 3 (jam3) and its identification as the jam2 counter-receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 45826–45832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Santoso, S.; Sachs, U.J.; Kroll, H.; Linder, M.; Ruf, A.; Preissner, K.T.; Chavakis, T. The junctional adhesion molecule 3 (jam-3) on human platelets is a counterreceptor for the leukocyte integrin mac-1. J. Exp. Med. 2002, 196, 679–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chavakis, T.; Keiper, T.; Matz-Westphal, R.; Hersemeyer, K.; Sachs, U.J.; Nawroth, P.P.; Preissner, K.T.; Santoso, S. The junctional adhesion molecule-c promotes neutrophil transendothelial migration in vitro and in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 55602–55608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zen, K.; Babbin, B.A.; Liu, Y.; Whelan, J.B.; Nusrat, A.; Parkos, C.A. Jam-c is a component of desmosomes and a ligand for cd11b/cd18-mediated neutrophil transepithelial migration. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15, 3926–3937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Aurrand-Lions, M.; Lamagna, C.; Dangerfield, J.P.; Wang, S.; Herrera, P.; Nourshargh, S.; Imhof, B.A. Junctional adhesion molecule-c regulates the early influx of leukocytes into tissues during inflammation. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 6406–6415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mandicourt, G.; Iden, S.; Ebnet, K.; Aurrand-Lions, M.; Imhof, B.A. Jam-c regulates tight junctions and integrin-mediated cell adhesion and migration. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 1830–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ebnet, K.; Aurrand-Lions, M.; Kuhn, A.; Kiefer, F.; Butz, S.; Zander, K.; Meyer zu Brickwedde, M.K.; Suzuki, A.; Imhof, B.A.; Vestweber, D. The junctional adhesion molecule (jam) family members jam-2 and jam-3 associate with the cell polarity protein par-3: A possible role for jams in endothelial cell polarity. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 3879–3891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Muller, U.; Bossy, B.; Venstrom, K.; Reichardt, L.F. Integrin alpha 8 beta 1 promotes attachment, cell spreading, and neurite outgrowth on fibronectin. Mol. Biol. Cell 1995, 6, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Denda, S.; Muller, U.; Crossin, K.L.; Erickson, H.P.; Reichardt, L.F. Utilization of a soluble integrin-alkaline phosphatase chimera to characterize integrin alpha 8 beta 1 receptor interactions with tenascin: Murine alpha 8 beta 1 binds to the rgd site in tenascin-c fragments, but not to native tenascin-c. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 5464–5474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Brandenberger, R.; Schmidt, A.; Linton, J.; Wang, D.; Backus, C.; Denda, S.; Muller, U.; Reichardt, L.F. Identification and characterization of a novel extracellular matrix protein nephronectin that is associated with integrin alpha8beta1 in the embryonic kidney. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 154, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bieritz, B.; Spessotto, P.; Colombatti, A.; Jahn, A.; Prols, F.; Hartner, A. Role of alpha8 integrin in mesangial cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation. Kidney Int. 2003, 64, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hartner, A.; Cordasic, N.; Klanke, B.; Muller, U.; Sterzel, R.B.; Hilgers, K.F. The alpha8 integrin chain affords mechanical stability to the glomerular capillary tuft in hypertensive glomerular disease. Am. J. Pathol. 2002, 160, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zargham, R.; Thibault, G. Alpha8beta1 integrin expression in the rat carotid artery: Involvement in smooth muscle cell migration and neointima formation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2005, 65, 813–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Farias, E.; Lu, M.; Li, X.; Schnapp, L.M. Integrin alpha8beta1-fibronectin interactions promote cell survival via pi3 kinase pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 329, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zargham, R.; Wamhoff, B.R.; Thibault, G. Rna interference targeting alpha8 integrin attenuates smooth muscle cell growth. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 939–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Hartner, A.; Menendez-Castro, C.; Cordasic, N.; Marek, I.; Volkert, G.; Klanke, B.; Rascher, W.; Hilgers, K.F. Tubulointerstitial de novo expression of the alpha8 integrin chain in a rodent model of renal fibrosis—A potential target for anti-fibrotic therapy? PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Marek, I.; Lichtneger, T.; Cordasic, N.; Hilgers, K.F.; Volkert, G.; Fahlbusch, F.; Rascher, W.; Hartner, A.; Menendez-Castro, C. Alpha8 integrin (itga8) signalling attenuates chronic renal interstitial fibrosis by reducing fibroblast activation, not by interfering with regulation of cell turnover. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kanoh, S.; Rubin, B.K. Mechanisms of action and clinical application of macrolides as immunomodulatory medications. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 590–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vestbo, J.; Anderson, W.; Coxson, H.O.; Crim, C.; Dawber, F.; Edwards, L.; Hagan, G.; Knobil, K.; Lomas, D.A.; MacNee, W.; et al. Evaluation of copd longitudinally to identify predictive surrogate end-points (eclipse). Eur. Respir. J. 2008, 31, 869–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Culic, O.; Erakovic, V.; Cepelak, I.; Barisic, K.; Brajsa, K.; Ferencic, Z.; Galovic, R.; Glojnaric, I.; Manojlovic, Z.; Munic, V.; et al. Azithromycin modulates neutrophil function and circulating inflammatory mediators in healthy human subjects. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 450, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lin, S.J.; Kuo, M.L.; Hsiao, H.S.; Lee, P.T. Azithromycin modulates immune response of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells and cd4+ t cells. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2016, 40, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ratzinger, F.; Haslacher, H.; Poeppl, W.; Hoermann, G.; Kovarik, J.J.; Jutz, S.; Steinberger, P.; Burgmann, H.; Pickl, W.F.; Schmetterer, K.G. Azithromycin suppresses cd4(+) t-cell activation by direct modulation of mtor activity. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 7438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Uriarte, S.M.; Molestina, R.E.; Miller, R.D.; Bernabo, J.; Farinati, A.; Eiguchi, K.; Ramirez, J.A.; Summersgill, J.T. Effect of macrolide antibiotics on human endothelial cells activated by chlamydia pneumoniae infection and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. J. Infect. Dis. 2002, 185, 1631–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Choi, Y.; Koh, S.J.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, J.W.; Gwan Kim, B.; Lee, K.L.; Kim, J.S. Roxithromycin inhibits nuclear factor kappab signaling and endoplasmic reticulum stress in intestinal epithelial cells and ameliorates experimental colitis in mice. Exp. Biol. Med. 2015, 240, 1664–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Amsden, G.W. Anti-inflammatory effects of macrolides—An underappreciated benefit in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections and chronic inflammatory pulmonary conditions? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 55, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Desaki, M.; Okazaki, H.; Sunazuka, T.; Omura, S.; Yamamoto, K.; Takizawa, H. Molecular mechanisms of anti-inflammatory action of erythromycin in human bronchial epithelial cells: Possible role in the signaling pathway that regulates nuclear factor-kappab activation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1581–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Sevilla-Sanchez, D.; Soy-Muner, D.; Soler-Porcar, N. Usefulness of macrolides as anti-inflammatories in respiratory diseases. Arch. Bronconeumol. 2010, 46, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Erythromycin. In Drugs and Lactation Database (Lactmed); Bethesda: Rockville, MD, USA, 2006.
  80. Knowles, J.A. Effects on the infant of drug therapy in nursing mothers. Drug Ther. N. Y. 1973, 3, 57–59. [Google Scholar]
  81. Matsuda, S. Transfer of antibiotics into maternal milk. Biol. Res. Pregnancy Perinatol. 1984, 5, 57–60. [Google Scholar]
  82. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, Z. Tissue and body fluid distribution of antibacterial agents in pregnant and lactating women. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 1997, 32, 288–292. [Google Scholar]
  83. Wilson, I.D.; Nicholson, J.K. The role of gut microbiota in drug response. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009, 15, 1519–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sorensen, H.T.; Skriver, M.V.; Pedersen, L.; Larsen, H.; Ebbesen, F.; Schonheyder, H.C. Risk of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis after maternal postnatal use of macrolides. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2003, 35, 104–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 07 00325 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of acute exposure of erythromycin on intestinal epithelial cell permeability. T84 cells were seeded in transwells and culture media was periodically changed until transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) value reached 800-1000 Ω. The TER value was recorded before and after incubation with five concentrations of erythromycin (Ery 0.03 = 0.03 μg/mL; Ery 0.3 = 0.3 μg/mL; Ery 3 = 3 μg/mL; Ery 30 = 30 μg/mL; and Ery 300 = 300 μg/mL) at 0, 1, 3, 24, and 48 h. The TER value recorded before adding erythromycin (time 0) served as the baseline. Data are presented here as fold increase or decrease in the same well before treatment. Each value represents an average of three independent experiments. * indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effect of acute exposure of erythromycin on intestinal epithelial cell permeability. T84 cells were seeded in transwells and culture media was periodically changed until transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) value reached 800-1000 Ω. The TER value was recorded before and after incubation with five concentrations of erythromycin (Ery 0.03 = 0.03 μg/mL; Ery 0.3 = 0.3 μg/mL; Ery 3 = 3 μg/mL; Ery 30 = 30 μg/mL; and Ery 300 = 300 μg/mL) at 0, 1, 3, 24, and 48 h. The TER value recorded before adding erythromycin (time 0) served as the baseline. Data are presented here as fold increase or decrease in the same well before treatment. Each value represents an average of three independent experiments. * indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 07 00325 g001
Microorganisms 07 00325 g002 550
Figure 2. The effect of chronic exposure of erythromycin on the intestinal epithelial cell permeability. T84 cells were seeded in transwells and culture media was periodically changed and cultured until TER value reached 800 to 1000 Ω. The TER value was recorded (at 0, 1, 3, 20, and 22 h) after daily treatment of erythromycin at two concentrations (E0.3 = 0.3 μg/mL and E300 = 300 μg/mL). Data here represent the fold change after daily treatment at each time point (n = 3) for five days. Erythromycin-free media in the control wells was also replaced at the same time.
Figure 2. The effect of chronic exposure of erythromycin on the intestinal epithelial cell permeability. T84 cells were seeded in transwells and culture media was periodically changed and cultured until TER value reached 800 to 1000 Ω. The TER value was recorded (at 0, 1, 3, 20, and 22 h) after daily treatment of erythromycin at two concentrations (E0.3 = 0.3 μg/mL and E300 = 300 μg/mL). Data here represent the fold change after daily treatment at each time point (n = 3) for five days. Erythromycin-free media in the control wells was also replaced at the same time.
Microorganisms 07 00325 g002
Microorganisms 07 00325 g003 550
Figure 3. The effect of acute exposure of erythromycin on cell cytotoxicity. Cell culture supernatants from the transwell apical compartment were assessed to determine the cell cytotoxicity by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a stable cytosolic enzyme that is released upon cell lysis. Released LDH in culture supernatants was measured with a 30-minute coupled enzymatic assay, which results in conversion of a tetrazolium salt (INT) into a red formazan product that is quantitated at wavelength absorbance of (OD490). Values here depict the fold change in LDH release as a measure of cytotoxicity caused by erythromycin exposure on T84 cells after 48 h single treatment as compared to untreated controls. * indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. The effect of acute exposure of erythromycin on cell cytotoxicity. Cell culture supernatants from the transwell apical compartment were assessed to determine the cell cytotoxicity by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a stable cytosolic enzyme that is released upon cell lysis. Released LDH in culture supernatants was measured with a 30-minute coupled enzymatic assay, which results in conversion of a tetrazolium salt (INT) into a red formazan product that is quantitated at wavelength absorbance of (OD490). Values here depict the fold change in LDH release as a measure of cytotoxicity caused by erythromycin exposure on T84 cells after 48 h single treatment as compared to untreated controls. * indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 07 00325 g003
Microorganisms 07 00325 g004 550
Figure 4. The effect of chronic exposure of erythromycin on cell cytotoxicity. Cell culture supernatants from the apical compartment of transwells were collected each day to determine the cell cytotoxicity by measuring released LDH as described in Figure 3. * indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. The effect of chronic exposure of erythromycin on cell cytotoxicity. Cell culture supernatants from the apical compartment of transwells were collected each day to determine the cell cytotoxicity by measuring released LDH as described in Figure 3. * indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 07 00325 g004
Table
Table 1. Differentially expressed genes after 48 h single treatment by erythromycin. (0.3 and 300 μg/mL).
Table 1. Differentially expressed genes after 48 h single treatment by erythromycin. (0.3 and 300 μg/mL).
Single Exposure for 48 h
Gene FunctionEry 0.3/Ery 0Ery 0.3/Ery 0Ery 300/Ery 0Ery 300/Ery0
Fold Changep ValueFold Changep Value
Tight junction
ICAM1Intercellular adhesion molecule 12.370.000636 2.050.016607
JAM3Junctional adhesion molecule 32.130.062148 2.650.040630
CLDN10Claudin 10–7.40.373085 –50.378114
CLDN11Claudin 113.680.944793 2.850.999572
CLDN14Claudin 14–1.550.592628 3.830.299305
CLDN17Claudin 17–2.740.452451 6.440.369806
CLDN18Claudin 182.020.402447 –1.570.633391
CLDN19Claudin 19–2.320.728604 –3.510.727239
CLDN6Claudin 61.270.465959 2.220.264438
Focal adhesion
CAV1Caveolin 1, caveolae protein–2.940.164653 –1.320.390713
CAV3Caveolin 314.520.120646 1.150.556335
ITGA4Integrin, alpha 45.070.385157 –1.130.841795
ITGA7Integrin, alpha 71.650.618012 2.20.367128
ITGA8Integrin, alpha 82.760.382339 175.020.024344
ITGAMIntegrin, alpha M–1.060.902768 3.210.308094
Gap junction
GJA1Gap junction protein, alpha 1–1.20.795080 –5.320.055363
GJA3Gap junction protein, alpha 3–1.330.417673 3.530.368254
GJA5Gap junction protein, alpha 52.930.364299 12.550.216151
GJB4Gap junction protein, beta 41.650.342500 2.010.286874
GJB5Gap junction protein, beta 51.320.365400 2.280.286658
GJB6Gap junction protein, beta 6–1.280.092314 1.670.420076
GJC3Gap junction protein, epsilon 11.950.367178 –25.080.263848
Adherens junction and desmosomes genes
DSC1Desmocollin 1–46.060.144780 –31.110.146747
DSG3Desmoglein 32.180.307182 30.088211
CDH2Cadherin 2, type 1, N-cadherin–1.280.092314 4.810.336937
NOTCH4Notch 41.710.217780 2.750.225017
PVRL1Poliovirus receptor-related 11.420.011171 1.570.264911
Table
Table 2. The differentially expressed genes after 5 days multi-treatment by erythromycin (0.3 μg/mL and 300 μg/mL).
Table 2. The differentially expressed genes after 5 days multi-treatment by erythromycin (0.3 μg/mL and 300 μg/mL).
Multi Treatment for 5 Days
Gene FunctionEry 0.3/Ery 0Ery 0.3/Ery 0Ery 300/Ery 0Ery 300/Ery 0
Fold Changep ValueFold Changep Value
Tight junction
ICAM2Intercellular adhesion molecule 2–1.090.308601 1.20.000850
CLDN10Claudin 10–1.090.649218 4.340.364360
CLDN14Claudin 14–14.640.121784 –2.790.217719
CLDN17Claudin 17–2.140.392266 –2.60.371088
CLDN18Claudin 183.180.298743 8.380.132072
CLDN19Claudin 198.20.099657 1.410.596306
CLDN8Claudin 8–2.050.235259 1.970.191047
Focal adhesion
CAV3Caveolin 3–14.020.158030 –3.760.284148
ITGA4Integrin, alpha 4–3.860.372310 –3.910.367691
ITGAMIntegrin, alpha M–3.770.596918 1.220.803690
ITGB3Integrin, beta 3–2.930.201419 –1.260.410330
Adherens junction and desmosomes genes
DSC1Desmocollin 1–1.070.969266 –2.690.136576
DSG3Desmoglein 38.140.293908 9.940.165064
Gap junction
GJA5Gap junction protein, alpha 51.350.454641 6.770.330339
GJB6Gap junction protein, beta 64.390.375203 1.120.596642
GJC2Gap junction protein, gamma 21.2040.78586–2.780.688153

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hao, H.; Gokulan, K.; Piñeiro, S.A.; Williams, K.M.; Yuan, Z.; Cerniglia, C.E.; Khare, S. Effects of Acute and Chronic Exposure to Residual Level Erythromycin on Human Intestinal Epithelium Cell Permeability and Cytotoxicity. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7090325

AMA Style

Hao H, Gokulan K, Piñeiro SA, Williams KM, Yuan Z, Cerniglia CE, Khare S. Effects of Acute and Chronic Exposure to Residual Level Erythromycin on Human Intestinal Epithelium Cell Permeability and Cytotoxicity. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(9):325. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7090325

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hao, Haihong, Kuppan Gokulan, Silvia A. Piñeiro, Katherine M. Williams, Zonghui Yuan, Carl E. Cerniglia, and Sangeeta Khare. 2019. "Effects of Acute and Chronic Exposure to Residual Level Erythromycin on Human Intestinal Epithelium Cell Permeability and Cytotoxicity" Microorganisms 7, no. 9: 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7090325

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop