Molecular Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria Associated with Opuntia dillenii (Ker Gawl.) Haw (Cactaceae) in the Coastal Zone of Benin
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Isolation of Cultivable Endophytic and Rhizosphere Bacteria from O. dillenii
2.1.1. Sampling of O. dillenii and Rhizosphere Soil
2.1.2. Surface Sterilization of O. dillenii Cladodes and Roots
2.1.3. Isolation of Cultivable Endophytic Bacteria
2.1.4. Isolation of Cultivable Rhizosphere Bacteria
2.1.5. Purification and Storage of Bacterial Isolates
2.2. Physicochemical Analyses of Rhizosphere Soil
2.3. Morphological Characterization of Bacterial Isolates
2.4. Molecular Characterization of the Bacterial Isolates
2.4.1. DNA Extraction
2.4.2. PCR Amplification of 16S rDNA and GyrB Genes
2.4.3. Sequencing
2.5. In Vitro Screening of Plant Growth-Promoting (PGP) Traits and Extracellular Enzyme Activities
2.5.1. Production of Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA)
2.5.2. Siderophore Production
2.5.3. Atmospheric Nitrogen Fixation
2.5.4. Phosphate Solubilization
2.5.5. Exopolysaccharide Production
2.5.6. Lipolytic Activity
2.5.7. Proteolytic Activity
2.5.8. Amylolytic Activity
2.5.9. Additional Screening
2.6. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Colonization Rate and Isolation Rate of Bacterial Isolates
3.2. Physicochemical Composition of Rhizosphere Soil
3.3. Morphological Diversity of Bacterial Isolates
3.4. Phylogeny Based on the 16S rRNA Gene of Bacteria Associated with O. dillenii
3.5. Phylogeny Based on the gyrB Gene of Bacteria Associated with O. dillenii
3.6. PGP and Enzymatic Potentials of Bacterial Strains
3.6.1. Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA) Production
3.6.2. Siderophore Production
3.6.3. Atmospheric Nitrogen Fixation
3.6.4. Phosphate Solubilization
3.6.5. Exopolysaccharide Production
3.6.6. Amylolytic Activity
3.6.7. Lipolytic Activity
3.6.8. Proteolytic Activity
3.6.9. Structuring and Classification of Bacterial Strains Based on Their PGP Traits
3.7. Resilience of Bacterial Strains to pH and Temperature Variations
3.7.1. Resilience of Bacterial Strains to pH Variations
3.7.2. Resilience of Bacterial Strains to Temperature Variations
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations. World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Ajeethan, N.; Abbey, L.; Yurgel, S.N. Role of Plant GrowthPromoting Microbes in Plant Growth and Development. Appl. Microbiol. 2026, 6, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojas-Rojas, F.U.; Gómez-Vázquez, I.M.; Estrada-de Los Santos, P.; Shimada-Beltrán, H.; Vega-Arreguín, J.C. The Potential of Paraburkholderia Species to Enhance Crop Growth. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025, 41, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Timofeeva, A.M.; Galyamova, M.R.; Sedykh, S.E. Plant Growth-Promoting Soil Bacteria: Nitrogen Fixation, Phosphate Solubilization, Siderophore Production, and Other Biological Activities. Plants 2023, 12, 4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maciel-Rodríguez, M.; Moreno-Valencia, F.D.; Plascencia-Espinosa, M. The Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in Soil Restoration: A Strategy to Promote Agricultural Sustainability. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hiltner, L. Über neuere Erfahrungen und Probleme auf dem Gebiet der Bodenbakteriologie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Gründüngung und Brache. Arb. Der Dtsch. Landwirtsch. Ges. 1904, 98, 59–78. [Google Scholar]
- Pacome, A.N.; Nadege, A.A.; Emma, W.G.; Hafiz, A.S.; Farid, B.-M.; Adolphe, A.; Simeon, O.K.; Lamine, B.-M. Metabolic and Biofungicidal Properties of Maize Rhizobacteria for Growth Promotion and Plant Disease Resistance. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 14, 811–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Lan, W.; Wei, Y.; Xu, F.; Xu, H. Impacts and Tolerance Responses of Coprinus comatus and Pleurotus cornucopiae on Cadmium Contaminated Soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 211, 111929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tran, L.; Duc, C.; Pham, D.; Dai, T.; Tuan, N. Bioprospecting Endophytic Bacteria in Curcuma zedoaria for In Vitro Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Potentials. Trop. J. Nat. Prod. Res. 2025, 9, 2299–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.; Alanazi, A.K.; Sohail, M. Enzymatic Saccharification of the Polysaccharides in Arthrocaulon macrostachyum Biomass: Characterization and Application in Methylene Blue Removal. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 310, 143389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anand, U.; Pal, T.; Yadav, N.; Singh, V.K.; Tripathi, V.; Choudhary, K.K.; Shukla, A.K.; Sunita, K.; Kumar, A.; Bontempi, E.; et al. Current Scenario and Future Prospects of Endophytic Microbes: Promising Candidates for Abiotic and Biotic Stress Management for Agricultural and Environmental Sustainability. Microb. Ecol. 2023, 86, 1455–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Osayande, I.S.; Han, X.; Tsuda, K. Dynamic Shifts in Plant-Microbe Relationships. Plant Biotechnol. 2025, 42, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmad, Z.; Wu, J.; Chen, L.; Dong, W. Isolated Bacillus subtilis Strain 330-2 and Its Antagonistic Genes Identified by the Removing PCR. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Andreozzi, A.; Prieto, P.; Mercado-Blanco, J.; Monaco, S.; Zampieri, E.; Romano, S.; Valè, G.; Defez, R.; Bianco, C. Efficient Colonization of the Endophytes Herbaspirillum huttiense RCA24 and Enterobacter cloacae RCA25 Influences the Physiological Parameters of Oryza Sativa L. Cv. Baldo Rice. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 3489–3504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krause, A.; Julich, H.; Mankar, M.; Reinhold-Hurek, B. The Regulatory Network Controlling Ethanol-Induced Expression of Alcohol Dehydrogenase in the Endophyte Azoarcus sp. Strain BH72. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2017, 30, 778–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ludueña, L.M.; Anzuay, M.S.; Angelini, J.G.; McIntosh, M.; Becker, A.; Rupp, O.; Goesmann, A.; Blom, J.; Fabra, A.; Taurian, T. Genome Sequence of the Endophytic Strain Enterobacter sp. J49, a Potential Biofertilizer for Peanut and Maize. Genomics 2019, 111, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mametja, N.M.; Ramadwa, T.E.; Managa, M.; Masebe, T.M. Recent Advances and Developments in Bacterial Endophyte Identification and Application: A 20-Year Landscape Review. Plants 2025, 14, 2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Passari, A.K.; Upadhyaya, K.; Singh, G.; Abdel-Azeem, A.M.; Thankappan, S.; Uthandi, S.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Malik, J.A.; As, A.; et al. Enhancement of Disease Resistance, Growth Potential, and Photosynthesis in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) by Inoculation with an Endophytic Actinobacterium, Streptomyces thermocarboxydus Strain BPSAC147. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saranraj, P.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Kokila, M.; Salomi, V.; Sivasakthivelan, P.; Manigandan, M.; Mawar, R. Evolving Concepts of Biocontrol of Phytopathogens by Endophytic Pseudomonas fluorescence. In Plant Growth Promoting Microorganisms of Arid Region; Mawar, R., Sayyed, R.Z., Sharma, S.K., Sattiraju, K.S., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 365–388. [Google Scholar]
- Tavares, M.J.; Nascimento, F.X.; Glick, B.R.; Rossi, M.J. The Expression of an Exogenous ACC Deaminase by the Endophyte Serratia grimesii BXF1 Promotes the Early Nodulation and Growth of Common Bean. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 66, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shoukat, R.; Cappai, M.; Pia, G.; Pilia, L. An Updated Review: Opuntia ficus indica (OFI) Chemistry and Its Diverse Applications. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, J.O.; De Barros, P.R.; Schulenburg, A.N.; Tully, K.L. Coastal Stressors Reduce Crop Yields and Alter Soil Nutrient Dynamics in Low-Elevation Farmlands. Discov. Agric. 2025, 3, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castle, S.C.; Samac, D.A.; Sadowsky, M.J.; Rosen, C.J.; Gutknecht, J.L.M.; Kinkel, L.L. Impacts of Sampling Design on Estimates of Microbial Community Diversity and Composition in Agricultural Soils. Microb. Ecol. 2019, 78, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ratnaweera, P.B.; De Silva, E.D.; Williams, D.E.; Andersen, R.J. Antimicrobial Activities of Endophytic Fungi Obtained from the Arid Zone Invasive Plant Opuntia dillenii and the Isolation of Equisetin, from Endophytic Fusarium sp. BMC Complement Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marchut-Mikołajczyk, O.; Chlebicz, M.; Kawecka, M.; Michalak, A.; Prucnal, F.; Nielipinski, M.; Filipek, J.; Jankowska, M.; Perek, Z.; Drożdżyński, P.; et al. Endophytic Bacteria Isolated from Urtica dioica L.—Preliminary Screening for Enzyme and Polyphenols Production. Microb. Cell Fact. 2023, 22, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Speck, Μ.L. Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods; American Public Health Association Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- ISO 7218:2024; Microbiology of the Food Chain—General Requirements and Guidance for Microbiological Examinations. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024. Available online: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/es/#iso:std:iso:7218:ed-4:v1:en (accessed on 23 March 2026).
- ISO 7218:2024; Microbiologie de La Chaîne Alimentaire—Exigences Générales et Recommandations Pour Les Examens Microbiologiques. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024.
- Fasusi, O.A.; Amoo, A.E.; Babalola, O.O. Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterial Isolates Associated with Food Plants in South Africa. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2021, 114, 1683–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stokes, G.G. On the Effect of the Internal Friction of Fluids on the Motion of Pendulums. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Part II, 9, 8-106. Scientific Research Publishing. Available online: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1109859 (accessed on 11 February 2026).
- Aguirre, J. Introduction. In The Kjeldahl Method: 140 Years; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An Examination of The Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter, and A Proposed Modification of The Chromic Acid Titration Method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bray, R.H.; Kurtz, L.T. Determination of Total, Organic, and Available Forms of Phosphorus in Soils. Soil Sci. 1945, 59, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schollenberger, C.J.; Simon, R.H. Determination of Exchange Capacity and Exchangeable Bases in Soil—Ammonium Acetate Method. Soil Sci. 1945, 59, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO/TS 22171:2023; Qualité Du Sol—Détermination de La Capacité d’échange Cationique (CEC) Potentielle et de La Teneur En Cations Échangeables, à l’aide d’une Solution Molaire d’acétate d’ammonium Tamponnée à pH 7. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
- Oman, S.F.; Camões, M.F.; Powell, K.J.; Rajagopalan, R.; Spitzer, P. Guidelines for Potentiometric Measurements in Suspensions Part A. The Suspension Effect (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2007, 79, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. GLOSOLAN Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs); Global Soil Partnership—FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Riegel, P.; Archambaud, M.; Clavé, D.; Vergnaud, M. Bactéries de Culture et D’identification Difficiles; bioMérieux: Paris, France, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Ripoll, J.; Bon, M.-C.; Jones, W. Optimization of the genomic DNA extraction method of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium Cav.), an invasive plant in the cultivated areas within the Mediterranean region. Biotechnol. Agron. Société Environ. 2011, 15, 95–100. [Google Scholar]
- Lane, D.J. 16S/23S rRNA Sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Turner, S.; Pryer, K.M.; Miao, V.P.W.; Palmer, J.D. Investigating Deep Phylogenetic Relationships among Cyanobacteria and Plastids by Small Subunit rRNA Sequence Analysis1. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 1999, 46, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yamamoto, S.; Harayama, S. PCR Amplification and Direct Sequencing of gyrB Genes with Universal Primers and Their Application to the Detection and Taxonomic Analysis of Pseudomonas Putida Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1104–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gordon, S.A.; Weber, R.P. Colorimetric Estimation of Indoleacetic Acid. Plant Physiol. 1951, 26, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khamna, S.; Yokota, A.; Lumyong, S. Actinomycetes Isolated from Medicinal Plant Rhizosphere Soils: Diversity and Screening of Antifungal Compounds, Indole-3-Acetic Acid and Siderophore Production. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 25, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwyn, B.; Neilands, J.B. Universal Chemical Assay for the Detection and Determination of Siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 160, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jensen, H.L. THE AZOTOBACTERIACEAE. Bacteriol. Rev. 1954, 18, 195–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adeleke, B.S.; Fakoya, S. Isolation and Molecular Characterization of Potential Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria from Groundnut and Maize. Int. J. Plant Biol. 2025, 16, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalhais, L.C.; Dennis, P.G. (Eds.) The Plant Microbiome: Methods and Protocols. In Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer US: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Volume 2232. [Google Scholar]
- Masi, C.; Tebiso, A.; Selva Kumar, K.V. Isolation and Characterization of Potential Multiple Extracellular Enzyme-Producing Bacteria from Waste Dumping Area in Addis Ababa. Heliyon 2023, 9, e12645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dogan, G.; Taskin, B. Hydrolytic Enzymes Producing Bacterial Endophytes of Some Poaceae Plants. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2021, 70, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adeleke, B.S.; Fakoya, S. Isolation, Screening, and Molecular Identification of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria from Maize Rhizosphere Soil. Curr. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2025, 26, e0266217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sáhó, A.; Karikás, V.; Ásványi, B.; Lakatos, E.; Varga, L.; Greff, B. Bioactive Potential of Actinobacteria Strains Isolated from the Rhizosphere of Lavender, Lemon Balm, and Oregano. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zverev, A.O.; Kichko, A.A.; Pinaev, A.G.; Provorov, N.A.; Andronov, E.E. Diversity Indices of Plant Communities and Their Rhizosphere Microbiomes: An Attempt to Find the Connection. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goretzko, D.; Bühner, M. Factor Retention Using Machine Learning With Ordinal Data. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 2022, 46, 406–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lê, S.; Josse, J.; Husson, F. FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 2008, 25, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wicaksono, W.A.; Köberl, M.; White, R.A.; Jansson, J.K.; Jansson, C.; Cernava, T.; Berg, G. Plant-Specific Microbial Diversity Facilitates Functional Redundancy at the Soil-Root Interface. Plant Soil 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Chen, H.; Feng, X.; Zheng, C.; Liu, X.; Zhu, F. Soil Physicochemical Properties and Salt Leaching Associated with Typical Plant Communities in Coastal Saline Land. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2023, 23, 5542–5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Q.-C.; Lü, P.-P.; Hu, H.-W.; Yang, Y.; He, J.-Z. Bacterial Communities in the Phyllosphere Are Distinct from Those in Root and Soil, and Sensitive to Plant Species Changes in Subtropical Tree Plantations. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2023, 99, fiad033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, X.; Yan, G.; Wang, Q.; Xing, Y. Community Structure, Diversity and Function of Endophytic and Soil Microorganisms in Boreal Forest. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1410901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahmoudi, M.; Almario, J.; Lutap, K.; Nieselt, K.; Kemen, E. Microbial Communities Living inside Plant Leaves or on the Leaf Surface Are Differently Shaped by Environmental Cues. ISME Commun. 2024, 4, ycae103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hernández-Canseco, J.; Bautista-Cruz, A.; Rincón-Enríquez, G.; García-Sánchez, E.; Aquino-Bolaños, T. First Report of Drought-Tolerant halobacteria Associated with Agave Potatorum Zucc. Agronomy 2025, 15, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ujvári, G.; Grassi, A.; Avio, L.; Pagliarani, I.; Cristani, C.; Giovannetti, M.; Agnolucci, M.; Turrini, A. Root Endophytic Bacterial Communities Are Shaped by the Specific Microbiota Associated to Mycorrhizal Symbionts. Plant Soil 2025, 508, 275–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bockheim, J.G. Sandy Soils of the World: Taxonomy, Geography, and Soil Conditions. In Sandy Soils; Hartemink, A.E., Huang, J., Eds.; Progress in Soil Science; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 3–10. [Google Scholar]
- De Holanda, S.F.; Vargas, L.K.; Granada, C.E. Challenges for Sustainable Production in Sandy Soils: A Review. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023, 27, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minhal, F.; Ma’as, A.; Hanudin, E.; Sudira, P. Improvement of the Chemical Properties and Buffering Capacity of Coastal Sandy Soil as Affected by Clays and Organic By-Product Application. Soil Water Res. 2020, 15, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciric, V.; Prekop, N.; Seremesic, S.; Vojnov, B.; Pejic, B.; Radovanovic, D.; Marinkovic, D. The Implication of Cation Exchange Capacity (Cec) Assessment for Soil Quality Management and Improvement. Agric. For. 2023, 69, 113–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Athulya, B.M.; Priya, G.; Rani, B.; Aparna, B.; Nishan, M.A. Assessment of Soil Quality Index in the Southern Coastal Sandy Soils of Kerala, India. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change 2023, 13, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, B.M.; Stegen, J.C.; Kim, M.; Dong, K.; Adams, J.M.; Lee, Y.K. Soil pH Mediates the Balance between Stochastic and Deterministic Assembly of Bacteria. ISME J. 2018, 12, 1072–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tian, J.; He, N.; Hale, L.; Niu, S.; Yu, G.; Liu, Y.; Blagodatskaya, E.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Gao, Q.; Zhou, J. Soil Organic Matter Availability and Climate Drive Latitudinal Patterns in Bacterial Diversity from Tropical to Cold Temperate Forests. Funct. Ecol. 2018, 32, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lauber, C.L.; Hamady, M.; Knight, R.; Fierer, N. Pyrosequencing-Based Assessment of Soil pH as a Predictor of Soil Bacterial Community Structure at the Continental Scale. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 5111–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, T.; Chu, H. Threshold Effects of Soil pH on Microbial Co-Occurrence Structure in Acidic and Alkaline Arable Lands. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 800, 149592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Negi, R.; Sharma, B.; Kumar, S.; Chaubey, K.K.; Kaur, T.; Devi, R.; Yadav, A.; Kour, D.; Yadav, A.N. Plant Endophytes: Unveiling Hidden Applications toward Agro-Environment Sustainability. Folia Microbiol. 2024, 69, 181–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; White, J.F. Bioprospecting Desert Plants for Endophytic and Biostimulant Microbes: A Strategy for Enhancing Agricultural Production in a Hotter, Drier Future. Biology 2021, 10, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, A.; Chauhan, P.; Kumar, A.; Pooja; Mishra, T.; Padiyal, A.; Walia, Y.; Dhir, S.; Pandey, A.K. Latest Progress (2020–2024) in Bacterial Endophyte Research with Special Reference to Plant Disease Management: Achievements and Challenges. Discov. Plants 2025, 2, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fanin, N.; Kardol, P.; Farrell, M.; Nilsson, M.-C.; Gundale, M.J.; Wardle, D.A. The Ratio of Gram-Positive to Gram-Negative Bacterial PLFA Markers as an Indicator of Carbon Availability in Organic Soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2019, 128, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mousa, W.K.; Abu-Izneid, T.; Salah-Tantawy, A. High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals the Structure and Metabolic Resilience of Desert Microbiome Confronting Climate Change. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1294173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rahman, S.; Ahmad, M.; Aziz, M.A.; Alrayssi, T.I.; Mohammad, A.S.; Alothman, R.; Masmoudi, K. Exploring the Bacterial Communities in Date Palm Roots in Saline versus Non-Saline Environment. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sen, A.; Saji, J.; Faseela, P.; Zhang, C.; Mohanan, S.; Xia, Y. Exploring the Functional Roles of Endophytic Bacteria in Plant Stress Tolerance for Sustainable Agriculture: Diversity, Mechanisms, Applications, and Challenges. Plants 2026, 15, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eke, P.; Kumar, A.; Sahu, K.P.; Wakam, L.N.; Sheoran, N.; Ashajyothi, M.; Patel, A.; Fekam, F.B. Endophytic Bacteria of Desert Cactus (Euphorbia trigonas Mill) Confer Drought Tolerance and Induce Growth Promotion in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Microbiol. Res. 2019, 228, 126302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoon, H.; Lee, H.H.; Noh, H.S.; Lee, S.-J. Identification of Genus Deinococcus Strains by PCR Detection Using the gyrB Gene and Its Extension to Bacteria Domain. J. Microbiol. Methods 2024, 223, 106980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, Y.; Xie, J.; Yu, S.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Shang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhai, H.; Huang, Z.; et al. A Novel Method of Species-Specific Molecular Target Mining and Accurate Discrimination of Bacillus cereus Sensu Lato. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2025, 431, 111068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patiño-Navarrete, R.; Sanchis, V. Evolutionary Processes and Environmental Factors Underlying the Genetic Diversity and Lifestyles of Bacillus Cereus Group Bacteria. Res. Microbiol. 2017, 168, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Y.; Lai, Q.; Göker, M.; Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Wang, M.; Sun, Y.; Wang, L.; Shao, Z. Genomic Insights into the Taxonomic Status of the Bacillus Cereus Group. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schumann, P.; Pukall, R. The Discriminatory Power of Ribotyping as Automatable Technique for Differentiation of Bacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 36, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yamada, S.; Ohashi, E.; Agata, N.; Venkateswaran, K. Cloning and Nucleotide Sequence Analysis of gyrB of Bacillus cereus, B. thuringiensis, B. mycoides, and B. anthracis and Their Application to the Detection of B. cereus in Rice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 1483–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carroll, L.M.; Cheng, R.A.; Wiedmann, M.; Kovac, J. Keeping up with the Bacillus Cereus Group: Taxonomy through the Genomics Era and Beyond. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 7677–7702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bavykin, S.G.; Lysov, Y.P.; Zakhariev, V.; Kelly, J.J.; Jackman, J.; Stahl, D.A.; Cherni, A. Use of 16S rRNA, 23S rRNA, and gyrB Gene Sequence Analysis To Determine Phylogenetic Relationships of Bacillus Cereus Group Microorganisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 3711–3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hinnekens, P.; Fayad, N.; Gillis, A.; Mahillon, J. Conjugation across Bacillus Cereus and Kin: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1034440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rutkowska, N.; Daroch, M.; Marchut-Mikołajczyk, O. Exploring the Diversity and Genomics of Cultivable Bacillus-Related Endophytic Bacteria from the Medicinal Plant Galium aparine L. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1612860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ali, M.A.; Ahmed, T.; Ibrahim, E.; Rizwan, M.; Chong, K.P.; Yong, J.W.H. A Review on Mechanisms and Prospects of Endophytic Bacteria in Biocontrol of Plant Pathogenic Fungi and Their Plant Growth-Promoting Activities. Heliyon 2024, 10, e31573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ercole, T.G.; Bonotto, D.R.; Hungria, M.; Kava, V.M.; Galli, L.V. The Role of Endophytic Bacteria in Enhancing Plant Growth and Health for Sustainable Agriculture. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2025, 118, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lopes, R.; Tsui, S.; Gonçalves, P.J.R.O.; De Queiroz, M.V. A Look into a Multifunctional Toolbox: Endophytic Bacillus Species Provide Broad and Underexploited Benefits for Plants. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iqbal, Z.; Ahmad, M.; Raza, M.A.; Hilger, T.; Rasche, F. Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacillus Sp. Modulate Soil Exoenzyme Activities and Improve Wheat Growth. Microb. Ecol. 2024, 87, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fu, Y.; Lin, K.; Cheng, B.; Qi, L.; Zhang, Q.; Li, H.; Chen, X.; Zhang, C. Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacillus subtilis Y31 Promotes Cucumber Growth and Yield: Insights from Rhizosphere Microbiomics and Bacterial Genomics. Front. Microbiol. 2026, 16, 1751005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buisset, E.; Soust, M.; Scott, P.T. The Isolation of Free-Living Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria and the Assessment of Their Potential to Enhance Plant Growth in Combination with a Commercial Biostimulant. Microbiol. Res. 2025, 16, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renganathan, P.; Astorga-Eló, M.; Gaysina, L.A.; Puente, E.O.R.; Sainz-Hernández, J.C. Nitrogen Fixation by Diazotrophs: A Sustainable Alternative to Synthetic Fertilizers in Hydroponic Cultivation. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; Doshi, H.V.; Thakur, M.C. Bacillus Spp.: A Prolific Siderophore Producer. In Bacilli and Agrobiotechnology; Islam, M.T., Rahman, M., Pandey, P., Jha, C.K., Aeron, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 309–323. [Google Scholar]
- Saini, N.; Bundela, V.; Singh, S.; Sahgal, M.; Singh, A.V. Optimizing Siderophore Production in Bacillus subtilis to Enhance Seed Germination and Biocontrol Efficacy against Alternaria triticina and Bipolaris sorokiniana. J. Sci. Res. Rep. 2024, 30, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dogsa, I.; Bellich, B.; Blaznik, M.; Lagatolla, C.; Ravenscroft, N.; Rizzo, R.; Stopar, D.; Cescutti, P. Bacillus subtilis EpsA-O: A Novel Exopolysaccharide Structure Acting as an Efficient Adhesive in Biofilms. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2024, 10, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhowmik, B.; Afrin, S.; Jui, A.H.; Bhuiyan, R.H.; Rashid, M.M.; Miah, M.A.S.; Bhuiyan, M.N.I. Exploring the Purification, Characterization, and Industrial Applications of Exopolysaccharide (EPS) from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Strain BDIFST240014. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2025, 52, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-León, E.; Huang-Lin, E.; Amils, R.; Abrusci, C. Production and Characterisation of an Exopolysaccharide by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens: Biotechnological Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ehinmitan, E.; Losenge, T.; Mamati, E.; Ngumi, V.; Juma, P.; Siamalube, B. BioSolutions for Green Agriculture: Unveiling the Diverse Roles of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria. Int. J. Microbiol. 2024, 2024, 6181491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saberi Riseh, R.; Vatankhah, M.; Hassanisaadi, M.; Barka, E.A. Unveiling the Role of Hydrolytic Enzymes from Soil Biocontrol Bacteria in Sustainable Phytopathogen Management. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 2024, 29, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ling, L.; Li, Y.; Jiang, K.; Wang, Y.; Luo, H.; Cheng, W.; Pang, M.; Feng, L.; Yue, R.; Zhou, Y. Volatile Organic Compounds of Bacillus Spp. as an Emerging Antifungal Resource Play a Significant Role in Fruit Postharvest Disease Control. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hurtado-Bautista, E.; Islas-Robles, A.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G.; Olmedo-Alvarez, G. Thermal Plasticity and Evolutionary Constraints in Bacillus: Implications for Climate Change Adaptation. Biology 2024, 13, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kadapure, A.J.; Dalbanjan, N.P.; Praveen Kumar, S.K. Characterization of Heat, Salt, Acid, Alkaline, and Antibiotic Stress Response in Soil Isolate Bacillus Subtilis Strain PSK.A2. Int. Microbiol. 2024, 28, 315–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramzan, S.; Shaheen, M.; Khurshid, M.; Jabeen, F.; Mahmood, S.; Sarwar, A.; Ahmad, S. Bioprospecting and Phylogenetic Analysis of Priestia flexa AW3: An Industrially Significant Amylase-Producing Bacterium from Unexplored Contaminated Soil in Layyah. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 52, kuaf034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soto-Varela, Z.E.; Orozco-Sánchez, C.J.; Bolívar-Anillo, H.J.; Martínez, J.M.; Rodríguez, N.; Consuegra-Padilla, N.; Robledo-Meza, A.; Amils, R. Halotolerant Endophytic Bacteria Priestia flexa 7BS3110 with Hg2+ Tolerance Isolated from Avicennia germinans in a Caribbean Mangrove from Colombia. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdelfadil, M.R.; Patz, S.; Kolb, S.; Ruppel, S. Unveiling the Influence of Salinity on Bacterial Microbiome Assembly of Halophytes and Crops. Environ. Microbiome 2024, 19, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olagunju, O.O.; Ogunnusi, T.A.; Akpor, O.B. Evaluation of Indole Acetic Acid and Hydrogen Cyanide Production by Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria. Vegetos 2025, 39, 582–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, P.; Chauhan, P.K.; Upadhyay, S.K.; Singh, R.K.; Dwivedi, P.; Wang, J.; Jain, D.; Jiang, M. Mechanistic Insights and Potential Use of Siderophores Producing Microbes in Rhizosphere for Mitigation of Stress in Plants Grown in Degraded Land. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 898979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Y.; Wang, W.; Meng, X.; Niu, B.; Yang, J.; Chen, Q. The betA/B Genes as a Key Factor in Cronobacter sakazakii Survival under Desiccation Stress. J. Dairy Sci. 2025, 108, 8205–8221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vale, P.F. Providencia Rettgeri. Trends Microbiol. 2025, 33, 1354–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qin, Y.-L.; Liang, Z.-L.; Ai, G.-M.; Liu, W.-F.; Tao, Y.; Jiang, C.-Y.; Liu, S.-J.; Li, D.-F. Heterotrophic Nitrification by Alcaligenes faecalis Links Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen Metabolism. ISME J. 2024, 18, wrae174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Waheed, Z.; Iqbal, S.; Irfan, M.; Jabeen, K.; Umar, A.; Aljowaie, R.M.; Almutairi, S.M.; Gancarz, M. Pseudochrobactrum asaccharolyticum Mitigates Arsenic Induced Oxidative Stress of Maize Plant by Enhancing Water Status and Antioxidant Defense System. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aguennouz, R.; Aallam, Y.; Haddioui, A.; Hamdali, H. Unlocking Plant Growth-Promoting Traits of Endophytic Actinobacteria Isolated from Anacyclus pyrethrum, an Endemic Medicinal Plant of the Aguelmam Azegza Region, Morocco. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1682456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boukelloul, I.; Aouar, L.; Cherb, N.; Carvalho, M.F.; Oliveira, R.S.; Akkal, S.; Nieto, G.; Zellagui, A.; Necib, Y. Actinobacteria Isolated from Soils of Arid Saharan Regions Display Simultaneous Antifungal and Plant Growth Promoting Activities. Curr. Microbiol. 2024, 81, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]









| Primers | Steps | Temperatures | Time | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27F/1492R | Initial denaturation | 95 °C | 1 min | - |
| Denaturation | 95 °C | 15 s | 30 cycles | |
| Hybridization | 56 °C | 12 s | ||
| Extension | 72 °C | 12 s | ||
| Final extension | 72 °C | 20 min | - | |
| End of PCR | 4 °C | ∞ | - |
| Primers | Steps | Temperatures | Time | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UP1/UP2R | Initial denaturation | 95 °C | 5 min | - |
| Denaturation | 95 °C | 30 s | 35 cycles | |
| Hybridization | 56.5 °C | 30 s | ||
| Extension | 72 °C | 1 min 30 s | ||
| Final extension | 72 °C | 10 min | - | |
| End of PCR | 4 °C | ∞ | - |
| Category | Parameters | Mean ± Standard Deviation (n = 3) |
|---|---|---|
| Texture | % Clay | 0.19 ± 0.03 |
| % Fine silt | 0.00 ± 0.00 | |
| % Coarse silt | 0.35 ± 0.05 | |
| % Fine sand | 4.93 ± 0.17 | |
| % Coarse sand | 93.85 ± 0.31 | |
| Organic properties | C (%) | 0.29 ± 0.02 |
| N (%) | 0.048 ± 0.005 | |
| C/N ratio | 7.00 ± 0.24 | |
| MO (%) | 0.50 ± 0.03 | |
| Chemical properties | pH | 5.99 ± 0.04 |
| Exchangeable Ca2+ (meq/100 g) | 1.15 ± 0.06 | |
| Exchangeable Mg2+ (meq/100 g) | 0.125 ± 0.01 | |
| Exchangeable K+ (meq/100 g) | 0.383 ± 0.02 | |
| Exchangeable Na+ (meq/100 g) | 0.326 ± 0.02 | |
| Sum of exchangeable cations (meq/100 g) | 1.989 ± 0.08 | |
| CEC (meq/100 g) | 2.213 ± 0.13 | |
| TDS (%) | 89.88 ± 0.75 | |
| Assimilable P (mg/kg) | 6.00 ± 0.28 | |
| Soil solution | TDS (mg/L) | 248 ± 3.3 |
| Salinity (psu) | 0.17 ± 0.02 | |
| EC (µS/cm) | 281 ± 12 |
| Isolate Code | Shape | Elevation | Size | Surface | Opacity | Color | Consistency | Margin | Gram | Shape | Arrangement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Smooth | Opaque | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Rod | Single |
| C2 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Smooth | Opaque | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| C3 | Circular | Convex | Small | Smooth | Translucent | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G− | Rod | Single |
| C4 | Irregular | Flat | Large | Rough | Opaque | Whitish | Dry | Wavy | G+ | Rod | Single |
| C5 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Smooth | Opaque | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| C6 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Smooth | Opaque | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| C7 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Rough | Opaque | Whitish | Dry | Wavy | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| C8 | Irregular | Flat | Medium | Rough | Opaque | Whitish | Mucoid | Wavy | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| C9 | Circular | Convex | Small | Smooth | Opaque | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Cocci | Staphylococci |
| C10 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Smooth | Opaque | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| C11 | Circular | Convex | Punctiform | Smooth | Opaque | Bright yellow | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Cocci | Tetrad |
| C12 | Irregular | Flat | Large | Rough | Opaque | Whitish | Dry | Wavy | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| Isolate Code | Shape | Elevation | Size | Surface | Opacity | Color | Consistency | Margin | Gram | Shape | Arrangement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Circular | Convex | Medium | Smooth | Translucent | Yellow | Creamy | Entire | G- | Rod | Pairs |
| R2 | Irregular | Flat | Large | Rough | Opaque | Whitish | Dry | Wavy | G+ | Rod | Single |
| R3 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Rough | Opaque | Whitish | Dry | Wavy | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| R4 | Irregular | Flat | Medium | Rough | Opaque | Whitish | Mucoid | Wavy | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| R5 | Circular | Convex | Medium | Smooth | Translucent | Yellow | Creamy | Entire | G- | Rod | Pairs |
| R6 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Rough | Opaque | Whitish | Dry | Wavy | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| R7 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Smooth | Opaque | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| R8 | Irregular | Flat | Large | Rough | Opaque | Whitish | Dry | Wavy | G+ | Rod | Single |
| R9 | Irregular | Flat | Large | Rough | Opaque | Whitish | Dry | Wavy | G+ | Rod | Single |
| R10 | Circular | Convex | Small | Smooth | Opaque | Yellowish | Creamy | Entire | G- | Rod | Single |
| R11 | Circular | Convex | Small | Smooth | Translucent | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G- | Rod | Single |
| Isolate Code | Shape | Elevation | Size | Surface | Opacity | Color | Consistency | Margin | Gram | Shape | Arrangement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Circular | Convex | Small | Smooth | Opaque | Yellow | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Rod | Single |
| S2 | Circular | Convex | Small | Smooth | Translucent | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Rod | Single |
| S3 | Circular | Convex | Small | Smooth | Translucent | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G- | Rod | Single |
| S4 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Smooth | Opaque | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| S5 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Smooth | Opaque | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| S6 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Smooth | Opaque | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| S7 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Rough | Opaque | Whitish | Dry | Wavy | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| S8 | Circular | Flat | Medium | Smooth | Opaque | Whitish | Creamy | Entire | G+ | Rod | Pairs |
| Origin/Source | Codes | GenBank Accession No. | NCBI Blast Results | % Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cladode | C1 | PZ102195 | Priestia flexa KT719725.1 | 100% |
| C2 | PZ102196 | Priestia flexa PQ168997.1 | 100% | |
| C3 | PZ102197 | Providencia rettgeri MZ895029.1 | 99.87% | |
| C4 | PZ102198 | Bacillus anthracis PQ461949.1 | 100% | |
| C5 | PZ102199 | Priestia flexa OR814211.1 | 100% | |
| C6 | PZ102200 | Priestia flexa OR514189.1 | 100% | |
| C7 | PZ102201 | Bacillus subtilis PQ780361.1 | 99.75% | |
| C8 | PZ102202 | Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MT826227.1 | 100% | |
| C9 | PZ102203 | Staphylococcus hominis MZ712950.1 | 99.74% | |
| C10 | PZ102204 | Priestia flexa KT719725.1 | 100% | |
| C11 | PZ102205 | Micrococcus yunnanensis MT033093.1 | 100% | |
| C12 | PZ102206 | Bacillus cereus AP022907.1 | 99.91% | |
| Root | R1 | PZ102207 | Cronobacter sakazakii HQ880343.1 | 99.47% |
| R2 | PZ102208 | Bacillus anthracis MW819988.1 | 100% | |
| R3 | PZ102209 | Bacillus subtilis MK103123.1 | 100% | |
| R4 | PZ102210 | Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MT826227.1 | 100% | |
| R5 | PZ102211 | Cronobacter sakazakii JQ963900.1 | 100% | |
| R6 | PZ102212 | Bacillus subtilis MK103123.1 | 100% | |
| R7 | PZ102213 | Priestia flexa KT758531.1 | 100% | |
| R8 | PZ102214 | Bacillus cereus KF494193.1 | 99.68% | |
| R9 | PZ102215 | Bacillus cereus KU922281.1 | 100% | |
| R10 | PZ102216 | Pseudochrobactrum asaccharolyticum PX481839.1 | 100% | |
| R11 | PZ102217 | Providencia rettgeri PP980523.1 | 100% | |
| Soil | S1 | PZ102218 | Microbacterium aborescens PQ578210.1 | 100% |
| S2 | PZ102219 | Heyndrickxia oleronia MF662514.1 | 100% | |
| S3 | PZ102220 | Alcaligenes faecalis ON028636.1 | 100% | |
| S4 | PZ102221 | Priestia flexa KT719725.1 | 100% | |
| S5 | PZ102222 | Priestia flexa PP863229.1 | 100% | |
| S6 | PZ102223 | Priestia flexa PX285880.1 Priestia megaterium OM304331.1 | 100% | |
| S7 | PZ102224 | Bacillus subtilis subsp.Subtilis PV168344.1 | 100% | |
| S8 | PZ102225 | Priestia flexa KT719725.1 | 100% |
| Compartment | S | Shannon (H′) | Simpson_1-D | Equity (J′) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cladodes | 5 | 1.35 | 0.69 | 0.84 |
| Roots | 5 | 1.29 | 0.64 | 0.80 |
| Soil | 5 | 1.39 | 0.69 | 0.86 |
| Overall | 10 | 1.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| Origin/Source | Codes | GenBank Accession No. | NCBI Blast Results | % Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cladode | C1 | PZ149653 | Priestia flexa CP120590.2 | 99.89% |
| C2 | PZ149654 | Priestia flexa CP120590.2 | 99.61% | |
| C4 | PZ149655 | Bacillus paranthracis CP101135.1 | 100% | |
| C5 | PZ149656 | Priestia flexa CP120590.2 | 99.89% | |
| C6 | PZ149657 | Priestia flexa CP120590.2 | 99.29% | |
| C7 | PZ149658 | Bacillus subtilis CP174496.1 | 100% | |
| C8 | PZ149659 | Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CP195015.1 | 99.89% | |
| C10 | PZ149660 | Priestia flexa CP120590.2 | 99.86% | |
| C12 | PZ149661 | Bacillus tropicus CP053955.1 | 99.82% | |
| Root | R2 | PZ149662 | Bacillus anthracis CP126515.1 | 99.34% |
| R3 | PZ149663 | Bacillus subtilis CP174496.1 | 99.89% | |
| R4 | PZ149664 | Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CP195015.1 | 100% | |
| R6 | PZ149665 | Bacillus subtilis CP174496.1 | 99.78% | |
| R7 | PZ149666 | Priestia flexa CP120590.2 | 99.89% | |
| R8 | PZ149667 | Bacillus thuringiensis CP010088.1 Bacillus cereus KF022228.1 | 100% | |
| R9 | PZ149668 | Bacillus thuringiensis CP010088.1 Bacillus cereus KF022228.1 | 100% | |
| Soil | S4 | PZ149669 | Priestia flexa CP120590.2 | 99.55% |
| S5 | PZ149670 | Priestia flexa CP120590.2 | 99.87% | |
| S6 | PZ149671 | Priestia flexa CP120590.2 | 99.44% | |
| S7 | PZ149672 | Bacillus subtilis CP017112.1 | 100% | |
| S8 | PZ149673 | Priestia flexa CP120590.2 | 99.31% |
| Origin/Sources | Codes | Identity | EPS | Nitrogenase | Amylase | Siderophore (mm) | Phosphatase (PSI) | IAA (µg/mL) | Protease (mm) | Lipase (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cladode | C1 | P. flexa | - | ++ | + | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 3.05 ± 0.01 abc | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 8.65 ± 0.11 ef | 0.00 ± 0.00 f |
| C2 | P. flexa | - | ++ | ++ | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 2.78 ± 0.10 bcde | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 7.52 ± 0.46 ef | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| C3 | P. rettgeri | - | - | ++ | 30.37 ± 0.8 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 j | 90.94 ± 1.92 c | 0.00 ± 0.00 g | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| C4 | B. paranthracis | - | - | - | 26.50 ± 1.32 abc | 1.93 ± 0.06 g | 35.52 ± 1.51 j | 13.64 ± 0.12 d | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| C5 | P. flexa | ++ | + | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 1.89 ± 0.06 g | 68.08 ± 1.43 e | 13.99 ± 1.00 d | 16.18 ± 0.06 cd | |
| C6 | P. flexa | +++ | + | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 0.00 ± 0.00 j | 71.94 ± 1.03 d | 9.14 ± 0.18 ef | 13.91 ± 1.62 de | |
| C7 | B.subtilis | +++ | +++ | - | 27.96 ± 3.07 ab | 1.48 ± 0.10 hi | 47.34 ± 1.06 h | 15.03 ± 0.77 cd | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| C8 | B. amyloliquefaciens | +++ | + | - | 16.62 ± 0.00 efg | 1.49 ± 0.00 hi | 62.34 ± 0.81 g | 14.62 ± 0.01 cd | 17.48 ± 1.68 c | |
| C9 | S. hominis | - | +++ | - | 8.325 ± 0.00 j | 1.56 ± 0.10 ghi | 172.88 ± 0.11 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 g | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| C10 | Priestia flexa | - | + | - | 13.29 ± 0.04 ghi | 2.51 ± 0.01 def | 65.14 ± 0.68 f | 9.51 ± 0.19 e | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| C11 | M. yunnanensis | + | +++ | + | 8.32 ± 0.01 j | 2.38 ± 0.02 def | 47.79 ± 1.88 h | 0.00 ± 0.00 g | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| C12 | B. tropicus | - | - | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 1.61 ± 0.00 g | 40.58 ± 1.14 i | 18.28 ± 0.87 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| Root | R1 | C. sakazakii | + | ++ | - | 20.96 ± 1.44 days | 0.00 ± 0.00 j | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 0.00 ± 0.00 g | 0.00 ± 0.00 f |
| R2 | B. anthracis | - | - | - | 26.45 ± 2.68 abc | 1.74 ± 0.00 gh | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 16.23 ± 2.21 bcd | 21.61 ± 0.64 b | |
| R3 | B.subtilis | ++ | +++ | - | 15.73 ± 0.67 fgh | 3.41 ± 0.12 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 17.52 ± 0.01 bc | 26.55 ± 2.09 a | |
| R4 | B. amyloliquefaciens | +++ | + | - | 24.74 ± 0.48 bc | 1.28 ± 0.00 i | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 23.86 ± 1.56 a | 21.10 ± 2.02 b | |
| R5 | C. sakazakii | + | +++ | - | 20.08 ± 0.02 def | 0.00 ± 0.00 j | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 0.00 ± 0.00 g | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| R6 | B.subtilis | +++ | ++ | ++ | 22.99 ± 0.84 cd | 3.21 ± 0.07 ab | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 16.02 ± 0.67 bcd | 22.52 ± 0.95 b | |
| R7 | Priestia flexa | - | ++ | ++ | 18.7 ± 0.23 ef | 2.68 ± 0.15 cdef | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 9.98 ± 0.80 e | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| R8 | Bacillus cereus | - | - | +++ | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 0.00 ± 0.00 j | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 15.34 ± 0.43 cd | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| R9 | Bacillus cereus | - | - | - | 12.23 ± 0.03 hij | 2.28 ± 0.00 f | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 13.39 ± 0.80 d | 14.63 ± 0.69 de | |
| R10 | P. asaccharolyticum | - | - | - | 17.68 ± 1.12 ef | 2.69 ± 0.23 cdef | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 0.00 ± 0.00 g | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| R11 | P. rettgeri | - | - | + | 26.92 ± 0.63 abc | 0.00 ± 0.00 j | 96.22 ± 2.92 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 g | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| Soil | S1 | M. aborescens | - | - | - | 9.47 ± 0.00 ij | 2.84 ± 0.23 bcd | 33.05 ± 0.48 j | 8.92 ± 1.04 ef | 0.00 ± 0.00 f |
| S2 | H. oleronia | - | - | - | 11.14 ± 0.48 ij | 2.99 ± 0.00 abc | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 0.00 ± 0.00 g | 12.17 ± 0.90 e | |
| S3 | A. faecalis | - | - | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 2.36 ± 0.02 ef | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 0.00 ± 0.00 g | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| S4 | P. flexa | - | +++ | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 2.74 ± 0.36 cdef | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 10.25 ± 1.02 e | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| S5 | P. flexa | - | +++ | ++ | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 3.06 ± 0.08 abc | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 8.39 ± 0.82 ef | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| S6 | P. flexa | - | +++ | +++ | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 3.39 ± 0.05 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 6.24 ± 0.39 f | 0.00 ± 0.00 f | |
| S7 | B.subtilis | +++ | ++ | - | 27.88 ± 3.59 ab | 1.28 ± 0.03 i | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 16.33 ± 0.54 bcd | 23.62 ± 1.20 b | |
| S8 | P. flexa | - | + | ++ | 12.72 ± 0.51 ghi | 2.41 ± 0.11 def | 0.00 ± 0.00 k | 8.04 ± 0.11 ef | 0.00 ± 0.00 f |
| Origin/Source | Codes | Identity | Temperature (°C) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cladode | C1 | P. flexa | [25; 50] | [6; 11] |
| C2 | P. flexa | [25; 45] | [6; 11] | |
| C3 | P. rettgeri | [25; 45] | [6; 11] | |
| C4 | B. paranthracis | [25; 45] | [6; 11] | |
| C5 | P. flexa | [25; 55] | [6; 11] | |
| C6 | P. flexa | [25; 45] | [6; 11] | |
| C7 | B.subtilis | [25; 55] | [6; 11] | |
| C8 | B. amyloliquefaciens | [25; 50] | [6; 11] | |
| C9 | S. hominis | [25; 50] | [6; 11] | |
| C10 | Priestia flexa | [25; 45] | [6; 11] | |
| C11 | M. yunnanensis | [25; 55] | [6; 11] | |
| C12 | B. tropicus | [25; 45] | [6; 11] | |
| Root | R1 | C. sakazakii | [25; 50] | [5; 11] |
| R2 | B. anthracis | [25; 55] | [5; 11] | |
| R3 | B.subtilis | [25; 55] | [5; 8] | |
| R4 | B. amyloliquefaciens | [25; 50] | [5; 11] | |
| R5 | C. sakazakii | [25; 45] | [5; 11] | |
| R6 | B.subtilis | [25; 50] | [5; 11] | |
| R7 | Priestia flexa | [25; 50] | [5; 11] | |
| R8 | Bacillus cereus | [25; 45] | [5; 11] | |
| R9 | Bacillus cereus | [25; 45] | [5; 11] | |
| R10 | P. asaccharolyticum | [25; 45] | [5; 11] | |
| R11 | P. rettgeri | [25; 55] | [5; 11] | |
| Soil | S1 | M. aborescens | [25; 40] | [6; 10] |
| S2 | H. oleronia | [25; 55] | [5; 11] | |
| S3 | A. faecalis | [25; 50] | [5; 11] | |
| S4 | P. flexa | [25; 55] | [5; 11] | |
| S5 | P. flexa | [25; 50] | [6; 11] | |
| S6 | P. flexa | [25; 50] | [6; 11] | |
| S7 | B.subtilis | [25; 45] | [6; 11] | |
| S8 | P. flexa | [25; 50] | [6; 11] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Brun, Y.K.; Noumavo, A.D.P.; Colombet, J.; Atchadé, E.B.; Baba-Moussa, L.; Lefort, F. Molecular Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria Associated with Opuntia dillenii (Ker Gawl.) Haw (Cactaceae) in the Coastal Zone of Benin. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061376
Brun YK, Noumavo ADP, Colombet J, Atchadé EB, Baba-Moussa L, Lefort F. Molecular Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria Associated with Opuntia dillenii (Ker Gawl.) Haw (Cactaceae) in the Coastal Zone of Benin. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(6):1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061376
Chicago/Turabian StyleBrun, Yves Kévin, Agossou Damien Pacôme Noumavo, Julien Colombet, Etienne Bankolé Atchadé, Lamine Baba-Moussa, and François Lefort. 2026. "Molecular Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria Associated with Opuntia dillenii (Ker Gawl.) Haw (Cactaceae) in the Coastal Zone of Benin" Microorganisms 14, no. 6: 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061376
APA StyleBrun, Y. K., Noumavo, A. D. P., Colombet, J., Atchadé, E. B., Baba-Moussa, L., & Lefort, F. (2026). Molecular Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria Associated with Opuntia dillenii (Ker Gawl.) Haw (Cactaceae) in the Coastal Zone of Benin. Microorganisms, 14(6), 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061376

