Next Article in Journal
Reducing HPV Viral Burden in Men: A Synergistic Approach Using Pidotimod and Prophylactic Vaccination
Previous Article in Journal
Targeting Zoonotic Spillover Drivers for Global Pandemic Prevention: A Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrated Microbiomics and Metabolomics Reveal That Moisture Content and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Synergistically Regulate Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community, and Metabolite Profiles of Amaranth Silage

1
College of Grassland Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China
2
Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Hohhot 010019, China
3
Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China
4
Institute of Grassland Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot 010010, China
5
Ulanqab Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Ulanqab 012000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2026, 14(6), 1317; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061317
Submission received: 8 May 2026 / Revised: 3 June 2026 / Accepted: 4 June 2026 / Published: 12 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Microbiomes)

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of moisture content (80% vs. 70%) and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum inoculation on the fermentation quality, microbial community structure, and metabolite profiles of amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) silage using integrated microbiomics (full-length 16S rRNA sequencing) and untargeted metabolomics (UPLC-MS/MS). The results showed that high-moisture silage without inoculation (AhGCK) exhibited poor fermentation quality, characterized by high pH (5.09) and low lactic acid content (1.42% FM). Inoculation with L. plantarum significantly reduced pH (to 4.16) and increased lactic acid accumulation (to 3.65% FM) under high-moisture conditions. Wilting to 70% moisture combined with L. plantarum inoculation (AhSLP) achieved the best fermentation quality, with the lowest pH (4.20) and highest lactic acid (4.46% FM). Microbial community analysis revealed that Enterobacter cloacae dominated in AhGCK, whereas L. plantarum, Lentilactobacillus buchneri, and Levilactobacillus brevis became dominant after inoculation and wilting. Metabolomics identified 497 compounds across all treatments, with differential metabolites primarily enriched in pathways related to amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites such as diterpenoids and isoquinoline alkaloids. Highly significant correlations (p < 0.01) were observed between Enterobacter and cyclohexylammonium, between dTDP-3-O-methyl-β-L-rhamnose and 2-hydroxy-2H-benzo[h]chromene-2-carboxylate, between Lentilactobacillus and 3-ketosucrose (positive), and between Limosilactobacillus and 8-methylthiooctyl glucosinolate (positive), whereas Lactiplantibacillus and Escherichia Shigella showed no correlations with differential metabolites. These findings indicate that inoculating Lactobacillus plantarum at specific moisture levels (80% and 70%) promotes directed microbial community succession (as exemplified by positive correlations of Lentilactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus with beneficial metabolites) and optimized metabolite accumulation, which significantly lowers dry matter loss during fermentation and enhances the output of usable silage. This mechanism offers a practical theoretical foundation for improving amaranth silage production and boosting feed yield.

1. Introduction

The global livestock industry is facing increasing pressure from the growing scarcity of high-quality forage resources, making the development of high-yield, high-protein alternative forages a critical pathway for ensuring the sustainable development of the sector. Amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) is a C4 plant characterized by rapid growth, high biomass yield, and outstanding protein content. Its leaf crude protein content can reach 20–25% on a dry matter basis, and its composition of essential amino acids, including lysine and methionine, is superior to that of conventional gramineous crops such as maize, indicating its potential as a high-quality protein forage [1]. However, fresh amaranth typically has a moisture content of 80–85% and a low water-soluble carbohydrate content (approximately 2% on a dry matter basis). These characteristics predispose it to excessive growth of non-target microorganisms such as clostridia during ensiling, leading to butyric acid fermentation and substantial losses of dry matter and protein, which severely compromise the quality of its silage [2].
The essence of ensiling is a microbial-driven fermentation process under anaerobic conditions, in which beneficial microorganisms, such as lactic acid bacteria, convert plant water-soluble carbohydrates into organic acids, leading to a rapid decline in pH. This inhibits the activity of spoilage microorganisms and enables the long-term preservation of nutrients [3]. For unconventional protein forages such as amaranth, characterized by high moisture content (80–85%) and low water-soluble carbohydrate content (approximately 2% dry matter), the ensiling process faces even greater challenges. Moisture content is a key process parameter regulating microbial succession and metabolic pathways during ensiling. Studies have shown that when the moisture content of raw material exceeds 70%, the elevated water activity not only provides a favorable environment for competitive microorganisms such as clostridia but also alters the community assembly process by affecting cellular osmotic pressure and substrate diffusion rates, leading to the accumulation of undesirable metabolites such as butyric acid and ammonia nitrogen [4]. Through integrated microbiome and metabolome analysis of alfalfa silage with varying moisture contents, it was found that under high-moisture conditions, the relative abundance of the class Clostridia increased significantly and exhibited a strong positive correlation with metabolites such as butyric acid and putrescine [5]. In contrast, after reducing the moisture content to 65–70%, the relative abundance of lactic acid bacteria increased by 2.3-fold, and the fermentation metabolic pathways shifted toward homolactic fermentation [6]. This study revealed the underlying mechanism by which moisture content modulates niche competition among key microbial taxa, thereby reshaping the metabolic network [7].
L. plantarum, as a typical representative of facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria, is widely recognized as a model bacterium for silage additive research due to its rapid acid production rate, broad substrate utilization spectrum, and strong environmental adaptability [8]. Studies have indicated that the addition of L. plantarum can inhibit the growth of spoilage microorganisms such as clostridia and Enterobacteriaceae through multiple mechanisms, primarily rapid acidification and competition for nutrients, as well as bacteriocin secretion, thereby reducing protein degradation and dry matter loss. However, the regulatory efficacy of L. plantarum is significantly influenced by raw material characteristics, particularly moisture content. The meta-analysis by Li et al. demonstrated that in silage systems with a moisture content exceeding 70%, the promoting effect of exogenous L. plantarum on lactic acid accumulation was reduced by approximately 32% compared to systems with a moisture content below 70%, indicating that high-moisture conditions may weaken the competitive advantage of L. plantarum [9]. Therefore, elucidating the interaction between moisture content and L. plantarum is of great significance for optimizing the processing technology of amaranth silage.
In recent years, the maturation of microbiomics and metabolomics technologies has provided powerful tools for revealing the micro-level mechanisms of silage fermentation. High-throughput sequencing (e.g., full-length 16S rRNA sequencing) enables precise tracking of microbial community dynamics at the species level during ensiling, while untargeted metabolomics (e.g., LC-MS/MS) allows comprehensive profiling of metabolite accumulation patterns, thereby elucidating the intrinsic logic of fermentation regulation from an integrated perspective of microbial community, metabolites, and fermentation quality [10,11]. Although previous studies have demonstrated the synergistic regulatory effects of moisture content and Lactobacillus plantarum inoculation in corn, alfalfa, and sorghum silages [4,11], different forage materials may exhibit unique response patterns due to variations in their physicochemical properties and epiphytic microbial communities.
Amaranth, as a highly promising high-protein forage resource, holds great significance in alleviating the shortage of high-quality protein feed [1]. However, research on amaranth silage is still in its early stages. Existing studies have primarily focused on changes in conventional indicators of fermentation quality, lacking a systematic analysis of the interaction between moisture content and L. plantarum from the perspective of microbial and metabolic synergy. In particular, the unique chemical composition of amaranth, high protein, low sugar, and high moisture, suggests that its patterns of microbial community succession and metabolic responses during ensiling may differ from those of typical forages such as maize and alfalfa. Therefore, how the interaction between moisture content and L. plantarum affects the microbial community structure and metabolite composition of amaranth remains poorly understood at the systematic omics level [12]. Based on the aforementioned research background and the gaps in existing studies, this study proposes the following core hypothesis: in the amaranth silage system, the interaction between moisture content and L. plantarum co-determines the formation of fermentation quality and metabolite profiles by synergistically regulating the niche construction of microbial communities and the remodeling of metabolic functions. Specifically, different levels of moisture content may selectively enrich or inhibit specific microbial taxa by altering water activity, substrate availability, and microenvironmental osmotic pressure, thereby guiding the differential development of fermentation pathways. Meanwhile, exogenous addition of L. plantarum accelerates the establishment of homolactic fermentation under suitable moisture conditions, suppresses the competition of spoilage microorganisms such as clostridia, and influences the accumulation patterns of final metabolites through the regulation of key metabolic pathways. To validate this hypothesis, this study uses mature grain amaranth as the experimental material, sets different moisture content gradients, and establishes treatments with and without L. plantarum inoculation under each moisture condition. A systematic investigation will be conducted using a simulated ensiling system, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for the processing and utilization of high-protein forages such as amaranth.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Ensilage Preparation

The test material was Amaranthus hypochondriacus (cultivar ‘K472’), with seeds provided by Jilin Zhongxian Ecological Agriculture Technology Co., Ltd. (Jilin City, China) The experiment was sown on 19 June 2023 at the Hailiutu Science and Technology Park of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (40°41′30″ N, 111°2′30″ E). The experimental area has a temperate continental monsoon climate with an average annual frost-free period of 133 days. Sowing was performed manually in rows at a depth of 2 cm, with a row spacing of 20 cm and a plant spacing of 15 cm. The seeding rate was 9 kg·hm−2, resulting in a plant density of 1.5 × 105 plants·hm−2. During the growing period, irrigation was applied according to soil moisture, and regular manual weeding was carried out without the use of herbicides or fungicides. Uniform water and fertilizer management, manual weeding, and pest control were implemented throughout the experiment to ensure normal growth of amaranth. Harvesting was conducted on 20 September 2023, at the milk-ripe stage. Six independent 1 m2 quadrats were randomly selected in the field, and whole plants were harvested from each quadrat. Each quadrat served as a true biological replicate (rather than a subsample from a composite bulk sample). After harvest, the plants from each quadrat were placed separately on clean plastic sheeting, thoroughly mixed individually, and subsampled using the quartering method for each replicate. A portion of the fresh sample from each quadrat was immediately used to determine the initial chemical composition and microbial counts of that replicate; the remaining portion of each quadrat was used for moisture adjustment and independent silage preparation. A total of six such biological replicates were established per treatment. Based on the initially measured moisture content of the fresh sample, the material was adjusted to 80% and 70% moisture by adding distilled water or natural air drying, designated as the GFM group (80%) and SFM group (70%), respectively. After adjustment, the moisture content was re-checked to confirm the target values. Subsequently, the material from both groups was cut into approximately 2–3 cm segments using a handheld chipping cutter for silage preparation.
Amaranth materials with moisture contents adjusted to 80% and 70% were used for silage preparation, and four treatment groups were established. For the material with 80% moisture content, the treatment groups were designated as the additive-free control (AhGCK) and the group inoculated with L. plantarum JYLP-002 (AhGLP). For the material with 70% moisture content, the treatment groups were designated as the additive-free control (AhSCK) and the group inoculated with the same L. plantarum strain (AhSLP). L. plantarum JYLP-002 (patent No. 201810629862.9; provided by Shandong Zhongke Jiayi Bioengineering Co., Ltd., Qingzhou City, China; deposited at the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center under accession No. CGMCC 15801 on 23 May 2018) was applied at a dose of 1 × 106 CFU per gram of fresh matter (FM). The additive was dissolved in deionized water, and the solution was uniformly sprayed using a handheld sprayer at a rate of 10 mL per kilogram of amaranth; the control silages received an equal amount of deionized water. Subsequently, 500 g of amaranth samples were placed into polyethylene bags, vacuum-sealed, and stored for 60 days before sampling and analysis.

2.2. Nutritional Composition and Fermentation Product Analyses

Amaranth was harvested at maturity and subjected to two moisture content levels (80% and 70%) and two treatment groups (CK and LP). After 60 days of ensiling, samples were collected to evaluate fermentation performance, microbial community composition, and metabolite profiles. The dry matter (DM) content was determined for the amaranth material which was dried for 72 h at a constant temperature of 65 °C with a forced-air oven. The dried amaranth material was ground using a 1 mm screen (FW100, Taisite Instrument Co. Ltd., Tianjin, China) for nutritional compositions analysis. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists method was used to determine the crude protein (CP) content [13]. Fiber fractions, such as acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), were analyzed according to the method [14]. The method with a colorimetric reaction with anthrone reagent was used to determine the water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content [15].
The chopped 10 g amaranth was sampled and homogenized with 90 mL deionized water in a glassware graduated cylinder. The resulting extract was filtered through cleaner gauze (4 layers) of previously rinsed cheesecloth to ensure clarity. The pH value of the amaranth silage was measured by the extracted filtrate using a portable pH meter, with the probe previously calibrated for accuracy. The filtered extract was then analyzed for organic acid levels, including lactic acid (LA), acetic acid (AA), propionic acid (PA), and butyric acid (BA), using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described by You et al. [16]. Ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) content was determined following the phenol-hypochlorite method reported previously by Kleinschmit et al. [17].

2.3. Microbiological Analysis

Microbial populations including LAB, yeasts, mold, anerobic bacteria, and coliform bacteria in the FM and silage were assessed as described in a previous report [16]. After 60 days of fermentation, bacterial community composition of amaranth silage was characterized via 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Total DNA was extracted following [18], and PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was performed using primers 27F/1492R under the conditions described by Guo et al. [19]: 98 °C for 2 min; 30 cycles of 98 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 60 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Each treatment had six replicates. Purified PCR products were sequenced on the Pacbio_SMRT platform (Biomarker Technologies, Beijing, China).
Alpha diversity indices (coverage, Chao1, ACE, Simpson, Shannon) were calculated using QIIME v1.9.1 and Mothur v.1.30. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on UniFrac distances was conducted in R v3.2.5. OTUs were classified using RDP Classifier v2.2 against the SILVA database (Release 128) with a 0.7 confidence threshold and taxonomically assigned at phylum, genus, and species levels. Correlation heatmaps were generated using R-based tools. LEfSe analysis was employed to identify differential biomarkers between groups [20]. Microbial functions were predicted using PICRUSt2 based on the KEGG database, inferring functional gene composition by aligning sequences with phylogenetic references and integrating IMG genomic data [21].

2.4. Determination of Metabolites

Metabolite extraction and detection were performed using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS): 50 mg of amaranth sample was accurately weighed and mixed with 1000 μL of extraction solution (methanol: acetonitrile: water = 2:2:1, v/v/v) containing an internal standard (2 mg/L), vortexed for 30 s, then homogenized with ceramic beads at 45 Hz for 10 min, followed by ultrasonication in an ice-water bath at 4 °C for 10 min. The sample was kept at −20 °C for 1 h and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min; 500 μL of the supernatant was dried under vacuum. The dried metabolites were reconstituted in 160 μL of reconstitution solution (acetonitrile: water = 1:1, v/v), vortexed, sonicated, and centrifuged, after which 120 μL of the supernatant was transferred to a vial for analysis. A quality control (QC) sample was prepared by pooling 10 μL from each sample for instrument stability monitoring. Raw data were processed through peak detection, alignment, noise filtering, and normalization to obtain a metabolite expression matrix. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was used to evaluate differences between groups. The criteria for identifying differential metabolites were: variable importance in projection (VIP) > 1.0 derived from the OPLS-DA model, fold change (FC) ≥ 2 or ≤ 0.5 (i.e., |log2FC| ≥ 1), and a p-value (two-tailed Student’s t-test) adjusted by false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05. Metabolites meeting all three criteria were considered statistically significant differential metabolites. For metabolites with VIP > 1.0 and |log2FC| ≥ 1 but an FDR slightly above 0.05, their contribution to the OPLS-DA model and biological relevance were used for auxiliary judgment.

2.5. Data Analysis

Experimental data were initially organized and preprocessed using Microsoft Office Excel 2019. For the characteristics of the raw amaranth material prior to ensiling, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to assess differences between moisture levels. For all post-ensiling data, including fermentation quality indicators, microbial community profiles, and metabolomic features, a two-way ANOVA was conducted using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to evaluate the main effects of moisture content, L. plantarum inoculation, and their interaction. A total of six biological replicates were analyzed for each treatment group. Subsequently, Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test was used for multiple comparisons, and significant differences among treatment means were indicated by different letters (p < 0.05). Data visualization and analysis were conducted using Origin 2021 software. For microbiome and metabolome datasets, corresponding R packages were used for analysis and visualization. Specifically, metabolomic data were processed using Student’s t-test and fold-change analysis. Preliminary screening of differential metabolites between treatment groups was based on variable importance in projection (VIP) scores derived from orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) models, followed by further filtering using p-values or false discovery rate (FDR) from univariate analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Composition and Microbial Counts of Fresh Amaranth

The chemical composition and microbial counts of fresh samples of amaranth with different moisture content gradients are shown in Table 1. The DM content was 21.00% and 32.03%, respectively, which showed significant differences (p < 0.05). The DM content was inversely proportional to the CP and WSC contents, whereby the lower the DM content, in turn, was associated with lower CP and WSC contents. However, high DM content was associated with higher NDF and ADF content.

3.2. Chemical Composition and Fermentation Quality of Silages

The chemical composition and fermentation quality of silages with or without L. plantarum with different moisture content gradients are shown in Table 2. The moisture content had no significant effect (p > 0.05) on NDF, ADF, WSC, PA content, pH, and NH3-N/TN, and a highly significant effect (p < 0.01) on DM, CP, LA and AA content. The DM, CP and LA contents of AhSCK and AhSLP were significantly higher than those of AhGCK and AhGLP (p < 0.05), the AA contents of AhSCK were significantly higher than AhGCK (p < 0.05). There were significant or highly significant effects (p < 0.01 or 0.05) on LA content and pH of silage with or without additives, and no significant effects (p > 0.05) on other indicators. The pH and LA contents of the treatment groups without additives at different moisture contents were significantly higher and lower than those with additives (p < 0.05), the interaction of moisture content and additives had significant and highly significant effects on the pH and LA contents of silage (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01).

3.3. Microbial Community Diversity and Composition

The Venn diagram can show the number of common and unique features between samples and visualize feature overlap. Combined with species represented by features, common microorganisms in different samples can be identified. As shown in Figure 1, the total number of species in four groups was 104. In high-moisture silage groups, AhGCK and AhGLP had seven and 147 unique species respectively, and 20 common species. In the low-moisture silage treatment group, AhSCK and AhSLP had 170 and 206 unique species respectively and 106 common species. AhGCK and AhSCK shared two species, and AhGLP and AhSLP shared 93 species.
Table 3 shows the alpha diversity analysis of different treatments. Moisture had no significant effect on the silage alpha diversity index (p > 0.05), while there was a significant difference between additives on the silage Shannon index (p < 0.05). The interaction of moisture and additives significantly affected the ACE, Chao1 index, and coverage (p < 0.05). Under the same moisture conditions, the Chao1 index of AhGLP was significantly higher than that of AhGCK (p < 0.05), and the Simpson and Shannon indices of AhSLP were significantly higher than those of AhSCK (p < 0.05). In additive-free treatments with different moisture contents, the Chao1 index of AhGCK was significantly lower than that of AhSCK (p < 0.05). The coverage was higher than 99% for all treatments. The PCoA enables the classification of multiple samples to show the differences in species diversity between different groups (Figure 2). The distance between AhGCK and the other three groups was greater, indicating larger flora variability. However, the closer distance among the other three treatments suggested no significant difference in their flora.
In high-moisture silage without inoculation (AhGCK), the relative abundance of Firmicutes was significantly lower than in low-moisture silage without inoculation (AhSCK), whereas Proteobacteria showed the opposite trend. A similar pattern was observed between inoculated groups: AhGLP (high moisture) had lower Firmicutes and higher Proteobacteria than AhSLP (low moisture). Notably, the Firmicutes abundance in AhGLP was even lower than that in AhSCK, indicating that moisture reduction had a stronger effect on promoting Firmicutes than inoculation did. The relative abundance of species at the genus level (top 20) for silages with different moisture content is shown in Figure 3B. After the anaerobic fermentation process, the dominant genus of fermenting silage with different moisture contents were different, among which the dominant genus of fermentation process in AhGCK were Lactiplantibacillus, Enterobacter, and Xanthomonas, and the dominant genus in AhGLP were Lactiplantibacillus, Lentilactobacillus, and Enterobacter. The dominant genus in AhSCK were Lactiplantibacillus, Lentilactobacillus, and Limosilactobacillus. The dominant genus in AhSLP were Lactiplantibacillus, Levilactobacillus, and Lentilactobacillus.
The dominant species differed markedly among treatments. In AhGCK, L. plantarum, Enterobacter cloacae, and Xanthomonas oryzae prevailed, with E. cloacae and X. oryzae being characteristic of high-moisture, non-inoculated silage. By contrast, low-moisture silage without inoculation (AhSCK) was dominated by L. plantarum, Lentilactobacillus buchneri, and Limosilactobacillus fermentum, with L. buchneri taking the place of the Enterobacterium. Inoculation with L. plantarum altered the species profile: AhGLP (high moisture + inoculation) was dominated by L. plantarum, L. buchneri, and Enterobacter cloacae, while AhSLP (low moisture + inoculation) was dominated by L. plantarum, Levilactobacillus brevis, and L. buchneri. Thus, the key distinction between the two inoculated groups was the presence of Levilactobacillus brevis in low-moisture silage (AhSLP), which was absent in high-moisture inoculated silage (AhGLP). Moreover, X. oryzae was abundant only in AhGCK and absent in all other groups.

3.4. Correlations Between Fermentation Quality Indicators and Bacterial Communities

The heat map of correlations between silage quality indicators and bacterial communities is shown (top 10) in Figure 4. CP, DM and AA content were negatively correlated with Lactococcus lactis, Clostridium tyrobutyricum, and Enterobacter cloacae (p < 0.05) while they were significantly positively correlated with L. buchneri which showed a significant positive correlation (p < 0.05). In addition, Levilactobacillus brevis, Limosilactobacillus fermentum, and unclassified Muribaculaceae were significantly positively correlated with CP content (p < 0.05). Levilactobacillus brevis and unclassified Muribaculaceae were significantly negatively correlated with pH and PA (p < 0.05) in the same way that L. buchneri was negatively correlated with pH (p < 0.05).

3.5. Metabolomic Profiling and Differential Metabolites

A total of 497 compounds were identified in the four groups, distributed among amino acid metabolism, biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, carbohydrate metabolism, global and overview maps, lipid metabolism, membrane transport, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides, and nucleotide metabolism (Figure 5A).
PCoA analysis is shown in Figure 5B. AhGCK, AhGLP, AhSCK, and AhSLP were separated, confirming experimental data accuracy and reliability. AhSCK differed significantly from the other three groups and was distant in the graph, with high component repeatability. QC samples overlapped, indicating high data reliability for further testing. OPLS—DA, a multivariate statistical analysis method for discriminant analysis, can assist in marker metabolite screening by calculating VIP, which measures metabolite expression pattern strength and explanatory power for sample group discrimination. R2X, R2Y, and Q2 are used to evaluate the OPLS—DA model, with values closer to 1 indicating a more reliable model. Samples under different treatments split on both sides, showing significant metabolic differences. Analysis of OPLS—DA evaluation model parameters showed R2Y > 0.99 and Q2 > 0.97 between different treatment samples, indicating a stable and reliable OPLS-DA model (Figure 6). The Volcano Plot offers a quick overview of metabolite content differences between two groups and their statistical significance. The differential expression Volcano Plot is shown in Figure 7. Results indicate that the AhGCK_vs_AhSCK comparison group had 1152 differential metabolites (DAMs) (1047 up-regulated, 105 down-regulated). The AhGCK_vs_AhGLP comparison group had 1105 DAMs (952 up-regulated, 153 down-regulated). The AhSCK_vs_AhSLP comparison group had 512 DAMs (237 up-regulated, 275 down-regulated), and the AhGLP_vs_AhSLP comparison group had 761 DAMs (237 up-regulated, 281 down-regulated).
As shown in Figure 8, KEGG enrichment analysis of the differential metabolites revealed that a total of 180 DAMs were enriched in 20 KEGG pathways in the AhGCK_vs_AhSCK comparison group, mainly in diterpenoid biosynthesis, 2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism and biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids. In the AhGCK_vs_AhGLP comparison group, a total of 178 DAMs were enriched in 20 KEGG pathways, mainly in isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis, and in the AhSCK_vs_AhSLP comparison group, 111 DAMs were enriched in the biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids and diterpenoid biosynthesis pathways. In the AhGLP_vs_AhSLP comparison group, a total of 140 DAMs were enriched in KEGG pathways such as biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids and purine metabolism.

3.6. Integrated Correlation Analysis Between Differential Metabolites and Differential Microbial Genera

The correlations between the differential metabolites and differential flora were analyzed using the top 10 frequencies and the results are shown in Figure 9. Figure 9A shows the correlation between the differential metabolites for the AhGCK_vs_AhSCK comparator group. The results showed that Cyclohexylammonium did not correlate with dTDP-3-O-Methyl-beta-L-rhamnose and 2-Hydroxy-2H-benzo[h]chromene-2-carboxylate (p > 0.05) and showed significant negative correlations with the other seven differential metabolites (p < 0.05). Digalacturonate, 3-ketosucrose, Osthol, OA, 6129 A and 8-Methylthiooctyl glucosinolate were negatively correlated with dTDP-3-O-Methyl-beta-L-rhamnose and 2-Hydroxy-2H-benzo[h] chromene-2-carboxylate showed a significant negative correlation (p < 0.05). However, dTDP-3-O-Methyl-beta-L-rhamnose and 2-Hydroxy-2H-benzo[h]chromene-2-carboxylate were negatively correlated with 1-(5-Phosphpribosyl)imidazole-4-acetate (p < 0.05). Enterobacter and cyclohexylammonium, dTDP-3-O-methyl-beta-L-rhamnose and 2-Hydroxy-2H-benzo[h]chromene-2-carboxylate were highly significantly correlated (p < 0.01); Lentilactobacillus showed a highly significant positive correlation with 3-Ketosucrose (p < 0.01) and Limosilactobacillus showed a highly significant positive correlation with 8-Methylthiooctyl glucosinolate (p < 0.01). However, Lactiplantibacillus and Escherichia Shigella were not correlated with differential metabolites.
Figure 9B shows the correlations between the differential metabolites of the AhGCK_vs_AhGLP comparison group. The results showed that 4-Fluorocyclohexadiene-cis,cis-1,2-diol-1-carboxylate and cyclohexylammonium were negatively correlated with the other differential metabolites (p < 0.05), 2-Hydroxy-2H-benzo[h]chromene-2-carboxylate was significantly correlated with each other (p > 0.05) but negatively correlated with the other differential metabolites (p < 0.05). Enterobacter was highly significantly correlated with 4-Fluorocyclohexadiene-cis,cis-1,2-diol-1-carboxylate, cyclohexylammonium and 2-Hydroxy-2H-benzo[h]chromene-2-carboxylate were highly significantly correlated (p < 0.01). Cyclohexylammonium was highly significantly correlated (p < 0.01) with Lentilactobacillus and Leuconostoc. 3-Ketosucrose was correlated with Leuconostoc, unclassified Muribaculaceae, and Akkermansia (p < 0.01).
Figure 9C shows the correlations among differential metabolites in the AhSCK_vs_AhSLP group. Findings indicate DIBOA, Pseudopelletierine, 2′-Deoxy-5-hydroxymethylcytidine-5′-diphosphate, UDP-kanosamine, and 5,6-EET were negatively correlated with 1,3E. Also, 5Z-Undecatriene and N-Acetylcadaverine were negatively correlated (p < 0.05). DIBOA and Pseudopelletierine were negatively correlated with 1-Piperidinecarboxaldehude and with each other (p < 0.05). 1-Piperidinecarboxaldehude and Sultopride were negatively correlated with 2′-Deoxy-5-hydroxymethylcytidine-5′-diphosphate, and UDP-kanosamine and 5,6-EET had significant negative correlations (p < 0.05). 5-(2-methoxyethy)isolongifal-5-ene was significantly negatively correlated with DIBOA, Pseudopelletierine, 2′-Deoxy-5-hydroxymethylcytidine-5′-diphosphate, UDP-Kanosamine, and 5,6-EET (p < 0.05). Lentilactobacillus was highly significantly correlated with sultopride, Levilactobacillus with 5,6-EET, and Bacillus with pseudopelletierine (p < 0.01).
Figure 9D shows the correlations between the differential metabolites in the AhGLP_vs_AhSLP comparison group. dTDP-3-O-methyl-beta-L-rhamnose showed significant negative correlations with the other nine differential metabolites (p < 0.05). Lactiplantibacillus was associated with dTDP-3-O-methyl-beta-L-rhamnose, amaranthin, medicagol, 5a,11a-Dehydrooxytetracycline, auraMycinone and 3-(2-Methylpropyl) pyridine were significantly correlated (p < 0.05). Levilactobacillus was significantly correlated with all the differential metabolites except Syringetin (p < 0.05). Bacillus was significantly correlated with dTDP-3-O-methyl-beta-L rhamnose and 3-Ketosucrose (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

Moisture content is a key environmental factor affecting the silage fermentation process [22,23]. When the raw material moisture content is in the range of 60–72%, it is most conducive to the fermentation process dominated by LAB [24]. In this study, the moisture content of freshly cut amaranth was approximately 80%, which decreased to about 70% after wilting treatment. This moisture gradient provided a sound material basis for investigating the impact of moisture on silage fermentation, although it is important to recognize that wilting may also alter plant physiology and epiphytic microbiota independently of moisture reduction, potentially confounding the interpretation of a pure moisture effect.
The pH value of silage directly reflects fermentation quality, with a low pH environment effectively inhibiting the proliferation of undesirable microorganisms [25]. Generally, a pH value below 4.20 indicates good fermentation. In this study, the AhGCK had a pH value as high as 5.09, significantly exceeding the standard for high-quality silage. Although the pH value of AhSCK decreased, it still did not reach the high-quality standard of 4.20. However, after inoculation with L. plantarum, the pH values of silage under both moisture conditions dropped below 4.20, indicating that the addition of exogenous LAB effectively promoted the fermentation process. The decrease in pH is mainly attributed to the metabolic conversion of WSC by LAB. In an anaerobic environment, LAB proliferate rapidly and convert sugars into organic acids (primarily LA), leading to a decrease in system pH [23]. In this study, the LA content was significantly higher in the treatment groups inoculated with L. plantarum, which highly correlated with the trend of pH decrease. Notably, the pH value of AhGCK was as high as 5.09, indicating that LAB failed to become the dominant microbial community in this treatment, and the fermentation process was dominated by other microorganisms. This failure at 80% moisture without inoculation points to a possible threshold effect: above a certain moisture level, fast-growing Gram-negative bacteria may outcompete LAB even when fermentable carbohydrates are present, a hypothesis that warrants further testing.
The NH3-N content serves as a crucial indicator for assessing the extent of proteolysis in silage [26]. In the present study, the trend of NH3-N content exhibited an inverse correlation with CP content. Specifically, NH3-N content was lower in treatment groups inoculated with L. plantarum compared to non-inoculated groups, as well as in low-moisture treatment groups relative to high-moisture groups. This phenomenon can be attributed to the combined effects of LAB inoculation and moisture reduction: the rapid pH decline induced by LAB activity inhibits both proteolytic enzymes and protein-decomposing bacteria such as Clostridium spp. [27], while the low-moisture environment suppresses overall microbial metabolic activity through reduced water availability, thereby limiting protein deamination [28]. These findings are consistent with reports by He et al. and Kaewpila et al. [26,29], further validating the positive impact of LAB additives on silage protein preservation. Nevertheless, the relative contributions of plant-derived versus microbial proteases remain unknown, and the observed differences in NH3-N could also be influenced by wilting-induced changes in plant enzyme activity.
AA is the second most prevalent organic acid in silage, mainly originating from the metabolic activities of heterofermentative LAB [27]. In this study, compared with the AhGCK group, the AA content was higher in the other treatment groups, suggesting that wilting treatment and LAB inoculation enhanced the activity of heterofermentative LAB. PA and BA are generally considered unacceptable fermentation products in silage, as their production implies energy loss and a decline in fermentation quality. In this study, BA was not detected in any of the treatment groups, and the PA content was extremely low, indicating that extensive secondary fermentation did not occur during the fermentation process.
The extent of DM loss during fermentation is influenced by both the dominant microbial species and the availability of fermentable substrates. In this study, the DM and CP contents were lower in treatment groups not inoculated with LAB compared to inoculated groups, which aligns with reports by Yitbarek and Tamir, Irawan et al., and Zong et al. [30,31,32]. By rapidly establishing an acidic environment, LAB additives inhibit the activity of spoilage microorganisms, reducing the fermentation loss of nutrients, thereby demonstrating an advantage in preserving DM and CP.
The composition of structural carbohydrates in silage, particularly NDF and ADF content, serves as an important indicator for evaluating its rumen digestive characteristics. NDF primarily consists of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Excessively high NDF content can reduce feed digestibility, whereas lower NDF levels are beneficial for rumen fermentation [33]. In this study, under both moisture gradients, the NDF and ADF contents decreased to varying degrees following inoculation with L. plantarum. This phenomenon can be attributed to the acid hydrolysis of structural carbohydrates caused by the accumulation of organic acids resulting from exogenous LAB inoculation [34]. Research by Desta et al. confirmed that the acid hydrolysis process of structural carbohydrates is usually accompanied by the release of WSC [35].
WSC content is a critical limiting factor for microbial activity during the silage fermentation process, serving as the direct carbon and energy source for microbial metabolism [36,37]. During silage fermentation, WSC in the raw material not only acts as a fermentation substrate for LAB but can also be supplemented through the acid hydrolysis of fiber components. In this study, the WSC content was higher in the AhSLP than in AhSCK, indicating that the addition of L. plantarum effectively inhibited the consumption of WSC by competing microorganisms. Notably, regardless of whether LAB were inoculated or not, the WSC content of high-moisture silage was higher than that of low-moisture treatments. This may be because the overall microbial activity is higher in a high-moisture environment, releasing more bound carbohydrates through acid hydrolysis [38,39]. A higher residual WSC content has positive nutritional implications, as it can be rapidly fermented in the rumen to provide energy [35]. However, an alternative interpretation is also plausible: higher WSC in high-moisture silage might reflect lower microbial consumption due to substrate inhibition or preferential use of other carbon sources, and the underlying mechanisms remain unresolved.
Silage fermentation is essentially a microbially driven process, and the type and abundance of the participating microbial communities have a decisive impact on fermentation quality. Raw forage crops host a diverse epiphytic microbial community in the field. When environmental conditions change, microorganisms with better adaptability will occupy new ecological niches [28]. In this study, the coverage index for all samples was above 0.99, indicating that the sequencing depth adequately captured the majority of bacterial taxa present in the samples.
Analysis of diversity indices showed that after inoculating with L. plantarum under high-moisture conditions, the Shannon and Simpson indices decreased, indicating a reduction in bacterial diversity. Conversely, under low-moisture conditions, inoculation with L. plantarum led to an increase in these two indices. This result is not entirely consistent with findings reported by Wang et al. and Yang et al. [40,41]. Higher bacterial diversity typically reflects a complex microbial community structure, which in this study might be related to the coexistence of LAB and other potentially beneficial bacteria under low-moisture conditions. It is important to note, however, that diversity indices alone do not distinguish between beneficial diversity (e.g., coexistence of multiple LAB species) and spoilage-associated diversity (e.g., presence of enterobacteria). Consequently, the increased diversity observed in low-moisture inoculated silage should not be automatically interpreted as an improvement in quality.
At the phylum level, the predominant phyla across all treatment groups were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidota. After inoculation with L. plantarum under high-moisture conditions, the relative abundance of Firmicutes increased significantly, whereas that of Proteobacteria decreased significantly. In contrast, under low-moisture conditions, an opposite trend was observed. To gain a more in-depth understanding of this phenomenon, this study further analyzed the changes in the microbial community at the genus and species levels.
At the species level, in the high-moisture silage without lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculation, Enterobacter cloacae was the absolutely dominant species. After inoculation with L. plantarum, L. plantarum became the dominant species. This change is consistent with the findings of Guan et al. suggesting that exogenous LAB can effectively reshape the microbial community structure of high-moisture silage [42]. In AhSCK, L. buchneri was the dominant species. After inoculation with L. plantarum, Levilactobacillus brevis became the dominant species. This phenomenon implies that under low-moisture conditions, Levilactobacillus brevis may be more adaptable to the ecological niche of the stable fermentation phase compared to the exogenously added L. plantarum [43]. Notably, the relative abundances of L. buchneri and L. plantarum, which were the dominant species in the low-moisture silage, were largely unaffected by the exogenous additive, indicating that these two species exhibit good adaptability to the amaranth silage environment with a 70% moisture content.
Genera such as Enterobacter and Clostridium are typically regarded as undesirable microbial groups in silage. In this study, CP, DM, and AA contents were negatively correlated with Enterobacter cloacae, Clostridium tyrobutyricum, and Lactococcus lactis. Enterobacter cloacae and Clostridium tyrobutyricum compete with LAB for substrates, delaying the pH drop, leading to DM loss and NH3-N accumulation, thereby causing CP loss [44]. Clostridium spp. not only produce BA, reducing fermentation quality, but some species can also produce toxins harmful to animals [45]. Lactococcus lactis, as a facultatively heterofermentative LA bacterium, can metabolize pentoses via the phosphoketolase pathway to produce LA and AA [46]. The negative correlation observed in this study between Lactococcus lactis and DM, AA, and CP contents requires further investigation for validation, as there are currently few reports directly linking this bacterium to silage quality.
L. buchneri showed a highly significant positive correlation with CP, DM, and AA contents and a negative correlation with pH. As a heterofermentative LA bacterium, L. buchneri can convert LA to AA as a main metabolic product during fermentation [15] and metabolize arginine via the arginine deiminase pathway to produce ammonia, thereby alleviating self-inhibition under low pH conditions [47]. Moderate accumulation of AA has the potential to inhibit yeasts and molds, which can cause feed spoilage upon aerobic exposure. Therefore, heterofermentative LAB are valuable for reducing DM loss, improving aerobic stability, and minimizing CP loss [48]. This also explains the significant positive correlations observed between Levilactobacillus brevis, Limosilactobacillus fermentum, unclassified Muribaculaceae, and CP content.
Unclassified Muribaculaceae, belonging to the phylum Bacteroidota, have been reported as potentially beneficial bacteria in host-associated environments, although their ecological role in silage remains unclear. To date, no studies have characterized their function during ensiling. Research in other fields has shown that Muribaculaceae are associated with host health [49], extended lifespan in mice [50], and circadian rhythm oscillations in the rumen of dairy cows, with possible links to alleviating subclinical mastitis [51,52]. However, the relevance of these findings to silage fermentation is unknown. In the present study, the positive correlation between the relative abundance of this family and CP content was observed, which provides a preliminary clue for future investigations. Nevertheless, given the lack of direct evidence and the correlational nature of this finding, any functional interpretation regarding Muribaculaceae in the silage system should be treated with caution; it is possible that Muribaculaceae simply serve as an indicator of certain chemical conditions (e.g., nitrogen availability) rather than playing an active role in CP preservation.
In summary, the changes in fermentation parameters, nutritional components, and microbial communities observed in this study are the combined result of moisture content and exogenous LAB additive application. The high-moisture environment provided a competitive advantage for fast-growing Gram-negative bacteria like Enterobacter, leading to reduced fermentation quality. Wilting treatment inhibited competing microorganisms by reducing water activity, creating favorable conditions for LAB. The addition of exogenous L. plantarum further strengthened the competitive advantage of LAB, but the final outcome of microbial succession was significantly modulated by moisture content.
Notably, a close correspondence existed between the microbial community structure and fermentation parameters. The dominance of Enterobacter cloacae in the AhGCK treatment aligned closely with the characteristics of high pH, high NH3-N, and low LA content observed in this treatment. The enrichment of L. buchneri in the AhSCK treatment corresponded with its moderate fermentation quality. The dominance of the respective inoculated species in the L. plantarum-treated groups corresponded with the excellent fermentation parameters observed. This community-function correspondence confirms the functional roles of specific microbial taxa in silage fermentation.
To evaluate fermentation quality, numerous volatile organic acids in silage can be analyzed, including LA, AA, PA, and BA [53]. However, more complex compounds can be produced by different microbial populations in natural or LAB-inoculated silage. Clearly, the restricted detection of numerous organic acids in silage cannot fully represent its metabolomic changes. Metabolomics techniques can more accurately represent the metabolite composition in the environment and have also been applied in silage evaluation [19,54], thereby revealing the patterns of metabolite variation across different biological samples. Metabolites are the end products of cellular regulatory processes, and their levels can be viewed as the biological system’s response to genetic and environmental changes.
This study employed an untargeted metabolomics approach to systematically investigate changes in the metabolite profile of amaranth silage under different treatment conditions. Through identification and comparison of 497 metabolites across four treatment groups, significant metabolic differences were observed among groups, and these differences were closely correlated with specific microbial taxa. This metabolite-microbe association reveals the complex biochemical interaction network during amaranth ensiling, providing new insights into the microbial metabolic regulatory mechanisms underlying silage fermentation.
PCA results showed that AhSCK was distinctly separated from the other three treatment groups on the score plot, indicating that the ensiling process itself induced substantial metabolite reorganization, while additive treatment further altered metabolite accumulation patterns. Notably, the separation between AhGCK and AhSCK demonstrated that moisture content of the raw material exerts a decisive impact on the silage metabolome. Similarly, Wang et al. reported in alfalfa silage with different moisture contents that wilting significantly altered the microbial community structure, markedly increasing the relative abundance of LAB, whereas high-moisture treatment promoted the proliferation of non-lactic acid bacteria such as Enterobacter [55]. The dominant microorganism in AhGCK was Enterobacter cloacae, while AhSCK was dominated by L. buchneri and Levilactobacillus brevis. This difference in microbial communities is necessarily reflected in the metabolite profiles, as different microorganisms possess distinct metabolic networks and product spectra [28].
The tight clustering of QC samples in this study confirmed the high stability of the analytical platform and data reliability. The R2Y (>0.99) and Q2 (>0.97) values of the OPLS-DA models were both close to 1, indicating excellent fit and predictive ability of the constructed discriminant models. Ke et al. also reported similar model parameters (R2Y > 0.98, Q2 > 0.95) in alfalfa silage research, further validating the reliability of multi-omics integrated analysis for elucidating silage fermentation mechanisms [56].
The substantial differences in the number of differentially abundant metabolites (DAMs) among comparison groups (1152 vs. 1105 vs. 512 vs. 761) reflect the varying intensity with which different treatment factors regulate the metabolic network. The AhGCK_vs_AhSCK comparison yielded up to 1152 DAMs, with 1047 up-regulated, indicating that changes in moisture content exerted the most dramatic impact on metabolite accumulation. This phenomenon can be attributed to the combined effects of a high-moisture environment: on one hand, it preserves plant enzyme activity, allowing sustained plant metabolic activity during the early stage of ensiling [27]; on the other hand, it promotes the proliferation of Gram-negative bacteria such as Enterobacter, which possess complex secondary metabolic capabilities and can generate a diverse array of metabolites [2].
KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that DAMs from different comparison groups were enriched in distinct metabolic pathways, reflecting the specific regulation of the metabolic network of the amaranth-microbe interaction system by different treatment conditions. In the AhGCK_vs_AhSCK comparison group, DAMs were primarily enriched in secondary metabolic pathways such as diterpenoid biosynthesis and isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis. Diterpenoid compounds in plants typically serve as defensive secondary metabolites, induced upon mechanical damage or microbial invasion [57]. Physical operations during ensiling, such as chopping and compaction, simulate mechanical damage signals, thereby activating diterpenoid biosynthesis. Copeland et al. also found in rice that mechanical damage rapidly activated the expression of genes involved in defensive diterpenoid synthesis within 15 min [58]. The enrichment of the isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis pathway is closely related to microbial interactions; many members of this compound class (e.g., sanguinarine, chelerythrine) possess significant antimicrobial activity [59], potentially reflecting a plant chemical defense response against invasion by opportunistic pathogens such as Enterobacter during the early ensiling stage. Li et al. found that lactic acid bacteria inoculation significantly increased the abundance of terpenoids (25.29%) and esters (17.08%), confirming that secondary metabolites are important mediators through which microorganisms regulate silage quality [60].
In the AhGCK_vs_AhGLP comparison group, DAMs were enriched in pathways including isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis, monobactam antibiotic biosynthesis, and indole alkaloid biosynthesis. This enrichment pattern suggests that exogenous LAB inoculation may induce reprogramming of plant secondary metabolism. Monobactam compounds (e.g., nocardicins, sulfazecin) are a class of secondary metabolites with antimicrobial activity [61], and activation of their biosynthesis could reflect bidirectional chemical dialog in plant-probiotic interactions. Zhang et al. confirmed that inoculation with L. plantarum significantly altered the metabolite profile of alfalfa silage, particularly at the level of amino acid and energy metabolism pathways, even though conventional fermentation parameters (pH, organic acids) might not show significant improvement [62]. This suggests that metabolomic analysis can capture more sensitive signals of plant-microbe interactions than traditional fermentation indices.
DAMs in the AhSCK_vs_AhSLP comparison group were mainly enriched in pathways such as unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis, linoleic acid metabolism, and diterpenoid biosynthesis. Unsaturated fatty acids play important roles in silage, not only as an energy source but also in regulating cell membrane fluidity and signal transduction processes [62]. Yang et al. found in whole-plant corn silage that lactic acid bacteria inoculation significantly altered the accumulation pattern of fatty acid metabolites, with enrichment of the linoleic acid metabolism pathway closely related to silage aerobic stability [63]. The promotion of unsaturated fatty acid accumulation by lactic acid bacteria inoculation may be achieved through two mechanisms: contribution from the fatty acid synthesis metabolism of the lactic acid bacteria themselves and alteration of environmental pH by lactic acid bacteria metabolites (e.g., organic acids), which activates plant-derived lipase activity and promotes the release of ester-bound fatty acids [4].
In the AhGLP_vs_AhSLP comparison group, DAMs were enriched in pathways including purine metabolism, cyanoamino acid metabolism, histidine metabolism, and polyketide sugar unit biosynthesis. This comparison group reveals the impact of the ensiling process itself (rather than the additive) on metabolites, with enriched pathways primarily related to energy metabolism and nitrogen metabolism. Enrichment of purine metabolism reflects degradation and reorganization of nucleic acids during ensiling, an inevitable consequence of nucleotide turnover during microbial growth and reproduction [64]. Kilstrup et al. reported that lactic acid bacteria require a continuous supply of purines and pyrimidines during growth, and their metabolic state directly influences fermentation product composition [65]. The enrichment of the cyanoamino acid metabolism pathway deserves special attention because cyanogenic glycosides in certain plants can act as potential anti-nutritional factors [66], and the safety of their degradation products (e.g., hydrogen cyanide) is a key concern in silage research.
Through correlation analysis between the top 10 DAMs from each comparison group and differential microbial genera, multiple highly statistically significant metabolite-microbe association pairs were identified. These associations provide direct evidence for understanding how microorganisms regulate metabolite accumulation.
In the AhGCK_vs_AhSCK comparison group, Enterobacter showed highly significant positive correlations with cyclohexylammonium, dTDP-3-O-methyl-β-L-rhamnose, and 2-hydroxy-2H-benzo[h]chromene-2-carboxylate. The genus Enterobacter includes various Gram-negative bacteria with active metabolic capabilities; some members can utilize diverse carbon sources and produce complex secondary metabolites [44]. In the present study, Enterobacter abundance was positively correlated with these metabolites, consistent with the possibility that this genus contributes to their accumulation, but this remains to be tested [67]. The positive correlations observed in this study indicate that Enterobacter is a candidate microbe associated with these metabolites; however, further experiments are required to establish causality. Notably, compounds such as cyclohexylammonium can serve as nitrogen storage forms in the metabolism of certain microorganisms [68]; their accumulation may reflect the nitrogen metabolism characteristics dominated by Enterobacter. Conversely, the genus Lentilactobacillus showed a highly significant positive correlation with 3-ketosucrose, an oxidized derivative of sucrose that can serve as a precursor for exopolysaccharide synthesis in the metabolism of some lactic acid bacteria (particularly L. buchneri) or participate in the modification of antimicrobial substances such as bacteriocins [46]. The highly significant positive correlation between the genus Limosilactobacillus and 8-methylthiooctyl glucosinolate is also noteworthy. Glucosinolates and their degradation products (isothiocyanates, thiocyanates, etc.) possess antioxidant and antimicrobial activities and may serve as important mediator molecules in lactic acid bacteria-plant interactions [69].
Analysis of the AhGCK_vs_AhGLP comparison group revealed that Enterobacter was highly significantly correlated with 4-fluorocyclohexadiene derivatives, cyclohexylammonium, and benzochromene derivatives. This pattern is similar to that in the AhGCK_vs_AhSCK comparison group, suggesting a potential association of Enterobacter with the presence of the aforementioned metabolites; however, correlation does not imply causation, and further experiments (e.g., pure culture inoculation or genetic manipulation) are required to determine whether Enterobacter directly contributes to their accumulation. Of particular note, cyclohexylammonium showed highly significant correlations with Lentilactobacillus and Leuconostoc, while 3-ketosucrose was highly significantly correlated with Leuconostoc, unclassified Muribaculaceae, and Akkermansia. Akkermansia has garnered significant attention as a next-generation probiotic candidate, playing an important role in maintaining intestinal mucus layer integrity [70]. Its detection in silage and correlation with specific metabolites suggest a possible link that warrants further research, but no functional role can be inferred from correlation alone.
In the AhSCK_vs_AhSLP comparison group, Lentilactobacillus showed a highly significant correlation with sultopride, Levilactobacillus with 5,6-EET, and Bacillus with pseudopelletierine. Sultopride is an aromatic compound whose biological function remains unclear, but its correlation with Lentilactobacillus may be associated with the presence of Lentilactobacillus, but this hypothesis requires experimental validation. 5,6-EET (5,6-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid) is a cytochrome P450 metabolite of arachidonic acid, known for its vasoregulatory and anti-inflammatory functions in mammals [71]; its presence in silage and correlation with Levilactobacillus represents a novel finding warranting further investigation. Xu et al. found in alfalfa silage that inoculation with different lactic acid bacteria strains significantly altered the metabolite profile, with specific metabolites showing strong correlations with particular bacterial genera, consistent with the patterns observed in this study [72]. In the AhGLP_vs_AhSLP comparison group, Lactiplantibacillus showed significant correlations with multiple metabolites, including dTDP-3-O-methyl-β-L-rhamnose, amaranthin, medicagol, and deoxytertonine. Amaranthin is a betalain pigment specific to amaranth with strong antioxidant activity [73]; its correlation with Lactiplantibacillus suggests that lactic acid bacteria may influence the stability or modification state of such pigments by altering the microenvironmental pH or producing glycosyltransferases. Medicagol is a coumestan phytoestrogen commonly found in leguminous plants such as alfalfa [74]; its presence in amaranth and correlation with lactic acid bacteria provides a new perspective for understanding the physiologically active functions of silage.
In summary, the metabolite differences and metabolite-microbe correlations observed in this study reflect the complex interaction network within the silage ecosystem. Moisture content and LAB additives regulate microbial community structure, thereby reshaping the overall metabolite profile of the system. From an ecological perspective, the high-moisture environment of the AhGCK treatment group provided a competitive advantage for fast-growing Gram-negative bacteria such as Enterobacter. These microorganisms possess diverse secondary metabolic capabilities, enabling them to produce various metabolites such as cyclohexylammonium and benzochromene derivatives. Their metabolic activities consume water-soluble carbohydrates and produce alkaline substances such as ammonia, which are not conducive to rapid pH decline [75]. In contrast, the wilting treatment in the AhSCK group reduced water activity, creating osmotic stress for moisture-sensitive microorganisms such as Enterobacter, thereby providing a competitive advantage for lactic acid bacteria, particularly L. buchneri and L. brevis [48]. The metabolism of these lactic acid bacteria is relatively focused on glycolysis and organic acid production, resulting in a comparatively simplified metabolite profile, reflected by a lower number of DAMs (512) and a more balanced up/down ratio. Ke et al. also found significant differences in metabolite profiles between high-moisture and low-moisture alfalfa silage, and these differences were modulated by lactic acid bacteria inoculation [56].
The regulation of the metabolite profile by LAB inoculation exhibited strain specificity and moisture dependence [9]. Under high-moisture conditions, L. plantarum inoculation partially inhibited the activity of Enterobacter but did not completely alter the microbial community structure; the metabolite profile still retained many characteristics associated with Enterobacter (e.g., the presence of cyclohexylammonium metabolites). Under wilted conditions, L. plantarum inoculation strengthened the competitive advantage of lactic acid bacteria, and the metabolite profile became more characteristic of a “LAB type,” enriched in pathways closely related to LAB metabolism, such as unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis and linoleic acid metabolism [76].
Notably, certain metabolites (e.g., dTDP-3-O-methyl-β-L-rhamnose) were identified as DAMs in multiple comparison groups and showed significant correlations with several genera, suggesting that such compounds may act as “hub metabolites” in silage fermentation, playing similar functional roles under different treatment conditions. Yang et al. found in whole-plant corn silage that D-galacturonic acid could serve as a biomarker for clostridial overgrowth, showing a strong positive correlation (R2 = 0.87, p < 0.01) with the abundance of Clostridium beijerinckii [7]. The dTDP-rhamnose derivative identified in this study may also possess similar biomarker potential, warranting further validation.
Given that metabolomics provides a more comprehensive and sensitive dataset than traditional fermentation parameters, it serves as a valuable complement for evaluating silage quality and microbial metabolic activity [3]. This approach not only reveals specific metabolite-microbe associations that establish a theoretical basis for developing rapid, metabolite-based diagnostic tools, but also yields critical insights into the underlying interaction networks. Based on these insights, more precise multi-species inoculant strategies can be designed, for example by targeting specific metabolic pathways to direct and optimize the fermentation process.
However, this study has certain limitations. Untargeted metabolomics comprehensively captures changes in the metabolite profile, but structural identification of some metabolites may lack precision; correlation analysis reveals associations between metabolites and microbes but cannot establish causality; findings from in vitro static culture conditions require further validation through in vivo animal studies. Future research could combine stable isotope tracing, in vitro pure culture techniques, and animal trials to deeply dissect the molecular mechanisms of key metabolite-microbe interaction pairs, providing a more robust theoretical basis for the efficient utilization of amaranth silage.

5. Conclusions

Moisture content is the primary ecological determinant in amaranth silage, dictating whether Enterobacteria or lactic acid bacteria dominate the fermentation. Reducing moisture from 80% to 70% suppresses spoilage organisms and creates a niche that favors moisture-adapted Lentilactobacillus buchneri and Levilactobacillus brevis. Exogenous L. plantarum accelerates fermentation but its success depends on moisture: it outcompetes others at 80% moisture, yet is partially displaced by native L. brevis at 70% moisture. Metabolomics confirms moisture as the main driver of metabolome remodeling—high moisture activates plant defense pathways, while LAB inoculation shifts metabolism toward fatty acids and antioxidants. Strong microbe-metabolite correlations offer candidate biomarkers for quality monitoring, and provide a theoretical foundation for developing moisture-targeted ensiling strategies, thereby enhancing fermentation stability and nutritive value.

Author Contributions

M.Z.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft. J.B.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis. X.J.: Supervision, Writing—review and editing. Y.L.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis. D.P.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis. L.Z.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis. Y.Y. and J.Z.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis. Z.W.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Writing—Review and editing. G.G.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Writing—Review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and Highly Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs and Construction of the Collaborative Innovation Base of the Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing, and Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. It was also funded by the following projects: the First-Class Discipline Special Fund General Project “Multi-Omics Analysis of Microbiome-Metabolome Interactions and Nutritional Regulation Mechanisms in Alfalfa Silage Fermentation Time Series” (IMAUCXQJ2025004), Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences 2025 Annual Research Support Funding Project-Research on the Formation Mechanism and Regulatory Mechanism of Grain Amaranth Silage Quality-2025CYZX03, the Research Initiation Project for High-level and Outstanding Doctoral Talent Introduction at Inner Mongolia Agricultural University “Response Mechanisms of Alfalfa Quality and Reserve Substances to Key Factors in Its Production Process” (NDYB2024-38).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the amaranth silage samples were deposited in the NCBI database with the accession number PRJNA888204.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Abbasi, M.; Rouzbehan, Y.; Rezaei, J.; Jacobsen, S.E. The effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculation, molasses, or wilting on the fermentation quality and nutritive value of amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) silage. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 3983–3992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oliveira, A.S.; Weinberg, Z.G.; Ogunade, I.M.; Cervantes, A.A.P.; Arriola, K.G.; Jiang, Y.; Kim, D.; Li, X.; Gonçalves, M.C.M.; Vyas, D.; et al. Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and performance of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 4587–4603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, D.; Wang, N.; Rinne, M.; Ke, W.; Fievez, V.; Guo, X. Multi-omics approaches to unravel the complex mechanisms of silage fermentation: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2025, 321, 116243. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, C.; He, L.; Xing, Y.; Zhou, W.; Yang, F.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Q. Effects of mixing Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri on fermentation quality, microbial community and metabolomics of Caragana korshinskii silage. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2024, 11, 89. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zheng, M.L.; Niu, D.Z.; Jiang, D.; Zuo, S.S.; Xu, C.C. Dynamics of microbial community during ensiling direct-cut alfalfa with and without LAB inoculant and sugar. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122, 1456–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, M.; Hao, J.; Liu, M.; Ge, G.; Jia, Y.; Du, S. Effects of Moisture Content Gradient on Alfalfa Silage Quality, Odor, and Bacterial Community Revealed by Electronic Nose and GC–MS. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yang, G.L.; Jiang, H.; Wang, H.R.; He, Z.N.; Wang, Z.M.; Wang, S.Y.; Jing, Y.Y.; Gao, F.Q. Role and mechanisms of moisture regulation in enhancing alfalfa silage quality. Res. Sq. 2026, preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Costa, D.M.; Carvalho, B.F.; Bernardes, T.F.; Schwan, R.F.; Ávila, C.L.S. New epiphytic strains of lactic acid bacteria improve the conservation of corn silage harvested at late maturity. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2021, 274, 114852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Z.; Bai, D.; Guo, Y.; Jiang, D.; Xu, C.; Niu, D.; Zhang, T.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Wu, Z.; et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of homofermentative lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation quality of whole-plant corn silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2022, 292, 115426. [Google Scholar]
  10. Guo, X.; Zhou, R.; Yu, Z.; Xu, D.; Wang, M.; Ding, Z.; Shen, Y.; Bai, J.; Ke, W.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Profiling of metabolome and bacterial community dynamics in ensiled Medicago sativa inoculated without or with Lactobacillus plantarum or Lactobacillus buchneri. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 266, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Su, R.; Ke, W.; Bai, J.; Wang, M.; Usman, S.; Xie, D.; Xu, D.; Chen, M.; Guo, X. Comprehensive profiling of the metabolome in corn silage inoculated with or without Lactiplantibacillus plantarum using different untargeted metabolomics analyses. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2023, 77, 323–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, M.; Bao, J.; Wang, Z.; Sun, P.; Liu, J.; Yan, Y.; Ge, G. Utilisation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and propionic acid to improve silage quality of amaranth before and after wilting: Fermentation quality, microbial communities, and their metabolic pathway. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1415290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  14. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. NI, K.-K.; Yang, H.-X.; Hua, W.; Wang, Y.-P.; Pang, H.-L. Selection and characterisation of lactic acid bacteria isolated from different origins for ensiling Robinia pseudoacacia and Morus alba L. Leaves. J. Integr. Agric. 2016, 15, 2353–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. You, S.; Du, S.; Ge, G.; Wan, T.; Jia, Y. Microbial Community and Fermentation Characteristics of Native Grass Prepared Without or With Isolated Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Mongolian Plateau. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 731770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kleinschmit, D.H.; Schmidt, R.J.; Kung, L. The effects of various antifungal additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 2130–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Eliasson, T.; Sun, L.; Lundh, Å.; Höjer, A.; Saedén, K.H.; Hetta, M.; Gonda, H. Epiphytic microbiota in Swedish grass-clover herbage and the effect of silage additives on fermentation profiles and bacterial community compositions of the resulting silages. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 134, lxad196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Guo, L.; Wang, X.; Lin, Y.; Yang, X.; Ni, K.; Yang, F. Microorganisms that are critical for the fermentation quality of paper mulberry silage. Food Energy Secur. 2021, 10, e304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W.S.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ward, T.; Larson, J.; Meulemans, J.; Hillmann, B.; Lynch, J.; Sidiropoulos, D.; Spear, J.R.; Caporaso, J.G.; Fettweis, J.; Knight, R.; et al. BugBase predicts organism-level microbiome phenotypes. bioRxiv 2017, preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Y.; Nishino, N. Bacterial and fungal communities of wilted Italian ryegrass silage inoculated with and without Lactobacillus rhamnosus or Lactobacillus buchneri. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 52, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.; He, L.; Xing, Y.; Zhou, W.; Yang, F.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Q. Dynamics of bacterial community and fermentation quality during ensiling of wilted and unwilted Moringa oleifera leaf silage with or without lactic acid bacterial inoculants. mSphere 2019, 4, e00341-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Franco, R.T.; Buffière, P.; Bayard, R. Optimizing storage of a catch crop before biogas production: Impact of ensiling and wilting under unsuitable weather conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 2017, 100, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kung, L.; Shaver, R.D.; Grant, R.J.; Schmidt, R.J. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 4020–4033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kaewpila, C.; Khota, W.; Gunun, P.; Kesorn, P.; Cherdthong, A. Strategic addition of different additives to improve silage fermentation, aerobic stability and in vitro digestibility of Napier grasses at late maturity stage. Agriculture 2020, 10, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. McDonald, P.; Henderson, A.R.; Heron, S.J.E. The Biochemistry of Silage, 2nd ed.; Chalcombe Publications: Marlow, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pahlow, G.; Muck, R.E.; Driehuis, F.; Oude Elferink, S.J.W.H.; Spoelstra, S.F. Microbiology of ensiling. In Silage Science and Technology; Buxton, D.R., Muck, R.E., Harrison, J.H., Eds.; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 2003; pp. 31–93. [Google Scholar]
  29. He, L.; Wang, C.; Xing, Y.; Zhou, W.; Pian, R.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Q. Ensiling characteristics, proteolysis and bacterial community of high-moisture corn stalk and stylo silage prepared with Bauhinia variegate flower. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 296, 122336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yitbarek, M.B.; Tamir, B. Silage additives: Review. Open J. Appl. Sci. 2014, 4, 258–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Irawan, A.; Sofyan, A.; Ridwan, R.; Hassim, H.A.; Respati, A.N.; Wardani, W.W.; Sadarman; Astuti, W.D.; Jayanegara, A. Effects of different lactic acid bacteria groups and fibrolytic enzymes as additives on silage quality: A meta-analysis. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2021, 14, 100654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zong, C.; Wu, Q.F.; Wu, A.L.; Chen, S.F.; Dong, D.; Zhao, J.; Shao, T.; Liu, Q.H. Exploring the diversity mechanism of fatty acids and the loss mechanisms of polyunsaturated fatty acids and fat-soluble vitamins in alfalfa silage using different additives. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2021, 280, 115044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jang, S.Y.; Kim, E.K.; Park, J.H.; Oh, M.R.; Tang, Y.J.; Ding, Y.L.; Seong, H.J.; Kim, W.H.; Yun, Y.S.; Moon, S.H. Effects of physically effective neutral detergent fiber content on dry matter intake, digestibility, and chewing activity in Korean native goats (Capra hircus coreanae) fed with total mixed ration. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 30, 1405–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jiang, F.; Cheng, H.; Liu, D.; Wang, C.; He, L.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Q. Treatment of whole-plant corn silage with lactic acid bacteria and organic acid enhances quality by elevating acid content, reducing pH, and inhibiting undesirable microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 593088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Desta, S.T.; Yuan, X.J.; Li, J.; Shao, T. Ensiling characteristics, structural and nonstructural carbohydrate composition and enzymatic digestibility of Napier grass ensiled with additives. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 221, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kaewpila, C.; Gunun, P.; Kesorn, P.; Subepang, S.; Thip-Uten, S.; Cai, Y.; Pholsen, S.; Cherdthong, A.; Khota, W. Improving ensiling characteristics by adding lactic acid bacteria modifies in vitro digestibility and methane production of forage-sorghum mixture silage. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1968, Correction in Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8049. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87311-x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kaewpila, C.; Khota, W.; Gunun, P.; Kesorn, P.; Kimprasit, T.; Sarnklong, C.; Cherdthong, A. Characterization of green manure sunn hemp crop silage prepared with additives: Aerobic instability, nitrogen value, and in vitro rumen methane production. Fermentation 2022, 8, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. da Silva, E.B.; Smith, M.L.; Savage, R.M.; Polukis, S.A.; Drouin, P.; Kung, L. Effects of Lactobacillus hilgardii 4785 and Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 on the bacterial community, fermentation and aerobic stability of high-moisture corn silage. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 130, 1481–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wu, Z.; Luo, Y.N.; Bao, J.Z.; Luo, Y.; Yu, Z. Additives affect the distribution of metabolic profile, microbial communities and antibiotic resistance genes in high-moisture sweet corn kernel silage. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 315, 123821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, S.; Dong, Z.; Li, J.; Chen, L.; Shao, T. Effect of wilting on the fermentation quality and microbial community of alfalfa silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019, 256, 114260. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yang, L.L.; Yuan, X.J.; Li, J.F.; Dong, Z.H.; Shao, T. Dynamics of microbial community and fermentation quality during ensiling of sterile and nonsterile alfalfa with or without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 275, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guan, H.; Yan, Y.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Shuai, Y.; Feng, G.; Ran, Q.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, X. Microbial communities and natural fermentation of corn silages prepared with farm bunker-silo in Southwest China. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 265, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xia, T.; Wang, T.; Sun, J.; Shi, W.; Liu, Y.; Huang, F.; Zhang, J.; Zhong, J. Modulation of fermentation quality and metabolome in co-ensiling of Sesbania cannabina and sweet sorghum by lactic acid bacterial inoculants. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 851271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Muck, R.E. Silage microbiology and its control through additives. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2010, 39, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dunière, L.; Sindou, J.; Chaucheyras-Durand, F.; Chevallier, I.; Thévenot-Sergentet, D. Silage processing and strategies to prevent persistence of undesirable microorganisms. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2013, 182, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gänzle, M.G. Lactic metabolism revisited: Metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and food spoilage. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 2, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Oshiro, M.; Zendo, T.; Nakayama, J. Diversity and dynamics of sourdough lactic acid bacteriota created by a slow food fermentation system. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2021, 131, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Muck, R.E.; Nadeau, E.M.G.; McAllister, T.A.; Contreras-Govea, F.E.; Santos, M.C.; Kung, L., Jr. Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3980–4000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lagkouvardos, I.; Lesker, T.R.; Hitch, T.C.A.; Gálvez, E.J.C.; Smit, N.; Neuhaus, K.; Wang, J.; Baines, J.F.; Abt, B.; Stecher, B.; et al. Sequence and cultivation study of Muribaculaceae reveals novel species, host preference, and functional potential of this yet undescribed family. Microbiome 2019, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Smith, B.J.; Miller, R.A.; Schmidt, T.M. Muribaculaceae genomes assembled from metagenomes suggest genetic drivers of differential response to acarbose treatment in mice. mSphere 2021, 6, e00851-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, Y.; Xu, T.; Xu, T.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, J. Melatonin induces circadian rhythms in the rumen microbial community of dairy cows. J. Pineal Res. 2022, 73, e12812. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hu, X.Y.; Li, S.; Mu, R.Y.; Guo, J.; Zhao, C.J.; Cao, Y.G.; Zhang, N.S.; Fu, Y.H. The Rumen Microbiota Contributes to the Development of Mastitis in Dairy Cows. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e02512-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Weinberg, Z.G.; Muck, R.E. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 19, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, Q.; Zhao, M.; Wang, Z.; Sun, L.; Liu, Y.; Ge, G. Metabolomics analysis reveals the metabolic changes during ensiling of alfalfa with different dry matter contents. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 269, 114655. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang, C.; He, L.; Xing, Y.; Zhou, W.; Yang, F.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Q. Effects of mixing Neolamarckia cadamba leaves on fermentation quality, microbial community of high moisture alfalfa and stylo silage. Microb. Biotechnol. 2019, 12, 869–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ke, C.; Su, R.; Franco, M.; Rinne, M.; Xu, D.M.; Zhang, G.J.; Guo, X.S. Impact of inoculants on alfalfa silage: A multi-omics analysis reveals microbial community and metabolic shifts despite undesirable fermentation quality. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2025, 324, 116329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Schmelz, E.A.; Kaplan, F.; Huffaker, A.; Dafoe, N.J.; Vaughan, M.M.; Ni, X.; Rocca, J.R.; Alborn, H.T.; Teal, P.E. Identity, regulation, and activity of inducible diterpenoid phytoalexins in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5455–5460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Copeland, C.; Li, X. Regulation of Plant Immunity by the Proteasome. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2019, 343, 37–63. [Google Scholar]
  59. Schmeller, T.; Latz-Brüning, B.; Wink, M. Biochemical activities of berberine, palmatine and sanguinarine mediating chemical defence against microorganisms and herbivores. Phytochemistry 1997, 44, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, Y.; Du, S.; Sun, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Sun, P.; Bai, B.; Ge, G.; Jia, Y.; Wang, Z. Volatile metabolomics and metagenomics reveal the effects of lactic acid bacteria on alfalfa silage quality, microbial communities, and volatile organic compounds. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. JJensen, S.E.; Paradkar, A.S.; Mosher, R.H.; Anders, C.; Beatty, P.H.; Brumlik, M.J.; Griffin, A.; Barton, B. Five genes governing the biosynthesis of the β-lactam antibiotic nocardicin A. Can. J. Microbiol. 2004, 50, 803–812. [Google Scholar]
  62. Fang, B.; Li, J.W.; Zhang, M.; Ren, F.Z.; Pang, G.F. Chronic chlorpyrifos exposure elicits diet-specific effects on metabolism and the gut microbiome in rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 111, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yang, F.; Fu, D.; Yu, X.; Lv, J.; Ma, C. Research on the spoilage characteristics of whole-plant corn silage inoculated with Clostridium beijerinckii SHZ-8. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1640283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Neves, A.R.; Pool, W.A.; Kok, J.; Kuipers, O.P.; Santos, H. Overview of sugar metabolism and its control in Lactococcus lactis—The input from in vivo NMR. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 531–554. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kilstrup, M.; Hammer, K.; Jensen, P.R.; Martinussen, J. Nucleotide metabolism and its control in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 555–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vetter, J. Plant cyanogenic glycosides. Toxicon 2000, 38, 11–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Driehuis, F.; Wilkinson, J.M.; Jiang, Y.; Ogunade, I.M.; Adesogan, A.T. Silage review: Animal and human health risks from silage. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 4093–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Reitzer, L. Nitrogen assimilation and global regulation in Escherichia coli. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2003, 57, 155–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fahey, J.W.; Zalcmann, A.T.; Talalay, P. The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 2001, 56, 5–51, Corrigendum in Phytochemistry 2022, 59, 237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00419-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Derrien, M.; Belzer, C.; de Vos, W.M. Akkermansia muciniphila and its role in regulating host functions. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 106, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Spector, A.A.; Norris, A.W. Action of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids on cellular function. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2007, 292, C996–C1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xu, D.; Ding, Z.; Wang, M.; Bai, J.; Ke, W.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, X. Metabolomic insights into the effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculation on alfalfa silage fermentation. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2022, 9, 45. [Google Scholar]
  73. Cai, Y.; Sun, M.; Corke, H. Antioxidant activity of betalains from plants of the Amaranthaceae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2288–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bickoff, E.M.; Livingston, A.L.; Witt, S.C.; Knuckles, B.E.; Guggolz, J.; Spencer, R.R. Medicagol, a New Coumestan From Alfalfa. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1965, 13, 597–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Borreani, G.; Tabacco, E.; Schmidt, R.J.; Holmes, B.J.; Muck, R.E. Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3952–3979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, S.; Zhao, J.; Dong, Z.; Li, J.; Shao, T. Effects of Lactobacillus buchneri and Lactobacillus plantarum on fermentation quality, microbial community and metabolic profiles of Caragana korshinskii silage. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1198. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Venn diagram showing shared and unique OTUs among the four treatment groups. Note: Each ellipse represents one treatment group. The overlapping regions indicate the number of OTUs common to the corresponding groups, while non-overlapping regions represent OTUs unique to a single group. AhGCK: high moisture (80%) without inoculation; AhGLP: high moisture with L. plantarum inoculation; AhSCK: low moisture (70%) without inoculation; AhSLP: low moisture with L. plantarum inoculation. Each ellipse represents one treatment group: green for AhGCK, red for AhGLP, blue for AhSCK, and orange for AhSLP.
Figure 1. Venn diagram showing shared and unique OTUs among the four treatment groups. Note: Each ellipse represents one treatment group. The overlapping regions indicate the number of OTUs common to the corresponding groups, while non-overlapping regions represent OTUs unique to a single group. AhGCK: high moisture (80%) without inoculation; AhGLP: high moisture with L. plantarum inoculation; AhSCK: low moisture (70%) without inoculation; AhSLP: low moisture with L. plantarum inoculation. Each ellipse represents one treatment group: green for AhGCK, red for AhGLP, blue for AhSCK, and orange for AhSLP.
Microorganisms 14 01317 g001
Figure 2. Principal coordinate analysis of bacterial communities based on weighted UniFrac distances. Note: Each point represents an individual sample. Different colors denote different treatment groups. The percentages on the x- and y-axes indicate the contribution of the first and second principal components to the total variance among samples, respectively.
Figure 2. Principal coordinate analysis of bacterial communities based on weighted UniFrac distances. Note: Each point represents an individual sample. Different colors denote different treatment groups. The percentages on the x- and y-axes indicate the contribution of the first and second principal components to the total variance among samples, respectively.
Microorganisms 14 01317 g002
Figure 3. Relative abundance of bacterial taxa at the phylum, genus, and species levels in amaranth silage. Note: (A) Phylum level (top 10). (B) Genus level (top 20). (C) Species level (top 20). The horizontal axis shows sample groups, and the vertical axis shows relative abundance as a percentage. Different colors represent different taxonomic groups.
Figure 3. Relative abundance of bacterial taxa at the phylum, genus, and species levels in amaranth silage. Note: (A) Phylum level (top 10). (B) Genus level (top 20). (C) Species level (top 20). The horizontal axis shows sample groups, and the vertical axis shows relative abundance as a percentage. Different colors represent different taxonomic groups.
Microorganisms 14 01317 g003
Figure 4. Correlation heatmap between fermentation quality indicators and the top 10 bacterial genera. Note: Each cell represents the Spearman correlation coefficient between a quality indicator and a bacterial genus. Red indicates positive correlation and blue indicates negative correlation. * indicates p < 0.05, ** indicates p < 0.01, and *** indicates p < 0.001.
Figure 4. Correlation heatmap between fermentation quality indicators and the top 10 bacterial genera. Note: Each cell represents the Spearman correlation coefficient between a quality indicator and a bacterial genus. Red indicates positive correlation and blue indicates negative correlation. * indicates p < 0.05, ** indicates p < 0.01, and *** indicates p < 0.001.
Microorganisms 14 01317 g004
Figure 5. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of metabolite profiles among the four treatments. Note: (A) Distribution of identified metabolites across KEGG pathways. The numbers and percentages indicate the count and proportion of metabolites annotated to each pathway (top 20 shown). (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of metabolite profiles based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. Each point represents an individual biological replicate (n = 6 per group). Different colors indicate different groups: green, AhGCK (80% moisture, without L. plantarum); red, AhGLP (80% moisture, with L. plantarum); blue, AhSCK (70% moisture, without L. plantarum); orange, AhSLP (70% moisture, with L. plantarum). QC samples (pooled quality controls, gray triangles) are also shown to demonstrate analytical repeatability. The percentages on the x- and y-axes represent the variance explained by the first principal component (87.9%) and the second principal component, respectively.
Figure 5. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of metabolite profiles among the four treatments. Note: (A) Distribution of identified metabolites across KEGG pathways. The numbers and percentages indicate the count and proportion of metabolites annotated to each pathway (top 20 shown). (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of metabolite profiles based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. Each point represents an individual biological replicate (n = 6 per group). Different colors indicate different groups: green, AhGCK (80% moisture, without L. plantarum); red, AhGLP (80% moisture, with L. plantarum); blue, AhSCK (70% moisture, without L. plantarum); orange, AhSLP (70% moisture, with L. plantarum). QC samples (pooled quality controls, gray triangles) are also shown to demonstrate analytical repeatability. The percentages on the x- and y-axes represent the variance explained by the first principal component (87.9%) and the second principal component, respectively.
Microorganisms 14 01317 g005
Figure 6. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis score plots for pairwise comparisons between treatment groups. Note: (A) AhGCK vs. AhSCK; (B) AhGCK vs. AhGLP; (C) AhSCK vs. AhSLP; (D) AhGLP vs. AhSLP. Each point represents a sample. R2Y and Q2 values indicate model goodness-of-fit and predictive ability, respectively.
Figure 6. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis score plots for pairwise comparisons between treatment groups. Note: (A) AhGCK vs. AhSCK; (B) AhGCK vs. AhGLP; (C) AhSCK vs. AhSLP; (D) AhGLP vs. AhSLP. Each point represents a sample. R2Y and Q2 values indicate model goodness-of-fit and predictive ability, respectively.
Microorganisms 14 01317 g006
Figure 7. Volcano plots of differentially abundant metabolites for each pairwise comparison. Note: (A) AhGCK vs. AhSCK; (B) AhGCK vs. AhGLP; (C) AhSCK vs. AhSLP; (D) AhGLP vs. AhSLP. Each point represents a metabolite. Red points indicate significantly up-regulated metabolites (|log2(fold change)| ≥ 1 and p < 0.05), blue points indicate significantly down-regulated metabolites (|log2(fold change)| ≤ −1 and p < 0.05), and gray points indicate non-significant metabolites. The x-axis shows log2(fold change) (positive values: up-regulated in the first-named group; negative values: up-regulated in the second-named group). The y-axis shows -log10 (p-value) from Student’s t-test (two-tailed), where higher values indicate greater statistical significance. The size of each point is proportional to the variable importance in projection (VIP) score derived from the OPLS-DA model (VIP > 1.0 used for preliminary selection). The top five metabolites with the smallest p-values are labeled with their names (when available).
Figure 7. Volcano plots of differentially abundant metabolites for each pairwise comparison. Note: (A) AhGCK vs. AhSCK; (B) AhGCK vs. AhGLP; (C) AhSCK vs. AhSLP; (D) AhGLP vs. AhSLP. Each point represents a metabolite. Red points indicate significantly up-regulated metabolites (|log2(fold change)| ≥ 1 and p < 0.05), blue points indicate significantly down-regulated metabolites (|log2(fold change)| ≤ −1 and p < 0.05), and gray points indicate non-significant metabolites. The x-axis shows log2(fold change) (positive values: up-regulated in the first-named group; negative values: up-regulated in the second-named group). The y-axis shows -log10 (p-value) from Student’s t-test (two-tailed), where higher values indicate greater statistical significance. The size of each point is proportional to the variable importance in projection (VIP) score derived from the OPLS-DA model (VIP > 1.0 used for preliminary selection). The top five metabolites with the smallest p-values are labeled with their names (when available).
Microorganisms 14 01317 g007
Figure 8. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differentially abundant metabolites. Note: (A) AhGCK vs. AhSCK; (B) AhGCK vs. AhGLP; (C) AhSCK vs. AhSLP; (D) AhGLP vs. AhSLP. Each bubble plot displays the top 20 enriched KEGG pathways (or all significant pathways, depending on data) for the respective comparison. The x-axis represents the rich factor (the ratio of the number of differentially abundant metabolites (DAMs) annotated to a given pathway to the total number of metabolites annotated to that pathway in the KEGG database). The y-axis lists the pathway names. The color of each bubble indicates the adjusted p-value (e.g., Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate, FDR) ranging from red (lower p-value, more significant) to blue (higher p-value). The size of each bubble is proportional to the number of DAMs enriched in that pathway. Pathways with FDR < 0.05 (or p < 0.05) were considered significantly enriched. Where appropriate, only the most significantly enriched pathways are labeled for clarity.
Figure 8. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differentially abundant metabolites. Note: (A) AhGCK vs. AhSCK; (B) AhGCK vs. AhGLP; (C) AhSCK vs. AhSLP; (D) AhGLP vs. AhSLP. Each bubble plot displays the top 20 enriched KEGG pathways (or all significant pathways, depending on data) for the respective comparison. The x-axis represents the rich factor (the ratio of the number of differentially abundant metabolites (DAMs) annotated to a given pathway to the total number of metabolites annotated to that pathway in the KEGG database). The y-axis lists the pathway names. The color of each bubble indicates the adjusted p-value (e.g., Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate, FDR) ranging from red (lower p-value, more significant) to blue (higher p-value). The size of each bubble is proportional to the number of DAMs enriched in that pathway. Pathways with FDR < 0.05 (or p < 0.05) were considered significantly enriched. Where appropriate, only the most significantly enriched pathways are labeled for clarity.
Microorganisms 14 01317 g008
Figure 9. Correlation network heatmaps between differentially abundant metabolites and differential microbial genera. Note: (A) AhGCK vs. AhSCK; (B) AhGCK vs. AhGLP; (C) AhSCK vs. AhSLP; (D) AhGLP vs. AhSLP. Each cell represents the correlation coefficient between a metabolite (row) and a bacterial genus (column). Red indicates positive correlation and blue indicates negative correlation. p < 0.05 was considered significant; p < 0.01 was considered highly significant.
Figure 9. Correlation network heatmaps between differentially abundant metabolites and differential microbial genera. Note: (A) AhGCK vs. AhSCK; (B) AhGCK vs. AhGLP; (C) AhSCK vs. AhSLP; (D) AhGLP vs. AhSLP. Each cell represents the correlation coefficient between a metabolite (row) and a bacterial genus (column). Red indicates positive correlation and blue indicates negative correlation. p < 0.05 was considered significant; p < 0.01 was considered highly significant.
Microorganisms 14 01317 g009
Table 1. Chemical composition and microbial counts of pre-ensiled amaranth at different moisture contents.
Table 1. Chemical composition and microbial counts of pre-ensiled amaranth at different moisture contents.
ItemsGFM (80%)SFM (70%)
DM (%FM)21.00 ± 1.23 b32.03 ± 0.16 a
CP (%DM)6.94 ± 0.06 a7.99 ± 0.85 a
NDF (%DM)46.37 ± 2.68 a47.39 ± 0.93 a
ADF (%DM)33.22 ± 1.05 a36.70 ± 0.74 a
WSC (%DM)1.18 ± 0.05 a1.35 ± 0.28 a
LAB (Log10 cfu/g FM)3.84 ± 0.55 a3.90 ± 0.78 a
Coliform bacteria (Log10 cfu/g FM)2.73 ± 2.53 a4.65 ± 2.04 a
Aerobic bacteria (Log10 cfu/g FM)6.45 ± 0.73 a4.03 ± 2.15 b
Yeast (Log10 cfu/g FM)4.55 ± 2.58 a5.26 ± 0.37 a
Mold (Log10 cfu/g FM)2.00 ± 1.76 a0.90 ± 0.39 a
Note: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Different lowercase letters within the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: FM, fresh matter; DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; WSC, water-soluble carbohydrates; LAB, lactic acid bacteria.
Table 2. Chemical composition and fermentation quality of amaranth silage after 60 days of ensiling.
Table 2. Chemical composition and fermentation quality of amaranth silage after 60 days of ensiling.
Items80%70%SEMSignificance
AhGCKAhGLPAhSCKAhSLPMAM × A
DM (%FM)20.90 ± 1.39 Ab21.13 ± 0.16 Ab31.46 ± 0.72 Aa31.37 ± 0.51 Aa3.0026<0.00010.90960.8023
CP (%DM)5.90 ± 0.69 Ab6.15 ± 0.26 Ab7.92 ± 0.85 Aa8.59 ± 0.75 Aa0.66010.00060.26300.6318
NDF (%DM)48.31 ± 2.19 Aa44.83 ± 2.69 Aa46.44 ± 1.94 Aa46.17 ± 0.74 Aa0.71660.83210.16830.2276
ADF (%DM)39.37 ± 1.18 Aa36.09 ± 1.58 Aa39.23 ± 1.29 Aa38.52 ± 1.59 Aa0.76060.08480.06200.0543
WSC (%DM)0.37 ± 0.10 Aa0.31 ± 0.09 Aa0.16 ± 0.03 Aa0.25 ± 0.06 Aa0.04480.10460.05031.0000
pH5.09 ± 0.39 Aa4.16 ± 0.05 Bb4.51 ± 0.04 Aa4.20 ± 0.01 Ba0.21470.07900.00210.0244
LA (%FM)1.42 ± 0.20 Bb3.65 ± 0.12 Ab3.85 ± 0.03 Ba4.46 ± 0.09 Aa0.6644<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
AA (%FM)0.37 ± 0.10 Ab0.40 ± 0.09 Aa0.51 ± 0.04 Aa0.49 ± 0.04 Aa0.03400.00770.86590.3564
PA (%FM)0.35 ± 0.13 Aa0.12 ± 0.02 Ba0.23 ± 0.14 Aa0.18 ± 0.06 Aa0.04880.52620.05370.1210
NH3-N/TN1.42 ± 0.32 Aa1.02 ± 0.03 Aa1.17 ± 0.08 Aa1.04 ± 0.22 Aa0.09200.30180.05030.2679
Note: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between moisture treatments within the same additive group (p < 0.05); different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between additive treatments within the same moisture group (p < 0.05). SEM, standard error of the mean; M, moisture effect; A, additive effect; M × A, interaction effect; Abbreviations are as listed in Table 1, with the following additions: LA, lactic acid; AA, acetic acid; PA, propionic acid; NH3-N/TN, ammonia nitrogen to total nitrogen ratio.
Table 3. Alpha diversity indices of bacterial communities in amaranth silage after 60 days of ensiling.
Table 3. Alpha diversity indices of bacterial communities in amaranth silage after 60 days of ensiling.
Items80%70%SEMSignificance
AhGCKAhGLPAhSCKAhSLPMAM × A
ACE227.2960 Aa338.4793 Aa399.6387 Aa252.3845 Aa39.66780.39470.71910.0191
Chao1123.4017 Bb276.1481 Aa262.6909 Aa237.1075 Aa34.76760.18250.09650.0252
Simpson0.6134 Aa0.6056 Aa0.4089 Ba0.7776 Aa0.07540.85840.06250.0532
Shannon1.9150 Aa2.4871 Aa1.8603 Ba3.5092 Aa0.38260.27210.01940.2238
Coverage0.9972 Aa0.9919 Ba0.9928 Ab0.9943 Aa0.00120.49520.21060.0370
Note: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between moisture levels (80% vs. 70%) within the same additive treatment (p < 0.05); different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between additive treatments (control vs. L. plantarum) within the same moisture level (p < 0.05). SEM, standard error of the mean; M, moisture effect; A, additive effect; M × A, interaction effect; Coverage values > 0.99 indicate adequate sequencing depth for all samples.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, M.; Bao, J.; Jiang, X.; Liu, Y.; Pan, D.; Zhu, L.; Yan, Y.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Z.; Ge, G. Integrated Microbiomics and Metabolomics Reveal That Moisture Content and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Synergistically Regulate Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community, and Metabolite Profiles of Amaranth Silage. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061317

AMA Style

Zhao M, Bao J, Jiang X, Liu Y, Pan D, Zhu L, Yan Y, Zhao J, Wang Z, Ge G. Integrated Microbiomics and Metabolomics Reveal That Moisture Content and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Synergistically Regulate Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community, and Metabolite Profiles of Amaranth Silage. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(6):1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061317

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Muqier, Jian Bao, Xiaowei Jiang, Yahong Liu, Dong Pan, La Zhu, Yuting Yan, Jiayu Zhao, Zhijun Wang, and Gentu Ge. 2026. "Integrated Microbiomics and Metabolomics Reveal That Moisture Content and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Synergistically Regulate Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community, and Metabolite Profiles of Amaranth Silage" Microorganisms 14, no. 6: 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061317

APA Style

Zhao, M., Bao, J., Jiang, X., Liu, Y., Pan, D., Zhu, L., Yan, Y., Zhao, J., Wang, Z., & Ge, G. (2026). Integrated Microbiomics and Metabolomics Reveal That Moisture Content and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Synergistically Regulate Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community, and Metabolite Profiles of Amaranth Silage. Microorganisms, 14(6), 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061317

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop