Effects of Roughage Combinations of Sugarcane Dry Leaves and Peanut Vine on the Rumen Microbial Community and Metabolites of Weaned Buffalo Calves
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Site and Time
2.2. Experimental Design
2.3. Feeding Management
2.4. Measured Indices and Methods
2.4.1. High-Throughput Sequencing Analysis of 16S rRNA Gene
2.4.2. LC/MS-Based Metabonomic Determination
- 1.
- UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis
- 2.
- Data processing and metabolite identification
2.5. Data Analysis
2.5.1. 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
2.5.2. Untargeted Metabolomics
2.5.3. Correlation Analysis
2.5.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Effects of Different Roughage Combinations on Rumen Microbial Diversity in Weaned Buffalo Calves
3.2. Effects of Different Roughage Combinations on Rumen Microbial Community Structure in Weaned Buffalo Calves
3.3. Effects of Different Roughage Combinations on KEGG Annotation of Rumen Microbiota in Weaned Buffalo Calves
3.4. Effects of Different Roughage Combinations on Rumen Microbial Metabolites in Weaned Buffalo Calves
3.5. Correlation Analysis Among Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation Parameters, Differential Microbes, and Differential Metabolites
4. Discussion
4.1. Effects of Different Roughage Combinations Containing Dried Sugarcane Leaves on Rumen Microbial Community and Metabolic Pathways in Weaned Buffalo Calves
4.2. Effects of Different Roughage Combinations on Rumen Metabolites and Key Metabolic Pathways in Weaned Buffalo Calves
4.3. Correlation Analysis Among Nutrient Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation Parameters, Key Fibrolytic Genera (Succiniclasticum and Ruminococcus), and Differential Metabolites in Weaned Buffalo Calves
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Firdayati, M.; Notodarmojo, P.A.; Oginawati, K. Study on the Use of Water and Feed Resources on Beef Cattle and Dairy Farms in Bandung Regency, West Java. E3S Web Conf. 2024, 485, 01007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Food and Agriculture—Statistical Yearbook 2024|FAO. Available online: https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1725784/ (accessed on 26 December 2025).
- Han, Y.; Chang, X.; Xiang, H.; Fang, Y.; Hao, L.; Gu, Y.; Han, X.; Zhao, B.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, C.; et al. Exploring Biomimetic Potential of Ruminant Digestion Strategies for Lignocellulosic Biomass Utilization: A Comprehensive Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 188, 113887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, T.; Lakshmanan, P.; Zhou, Z.; Deng, Y.; Deng, Y.; Yang, L.; Huang, D.; Song, X.; Liu, X.; Cong, W.-F.; et al. Sustainable Sugarcane Cropping in China. Eng. Agric. 2022, 9, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Food and Agriculture—Statistical Yearbook 2020|FAO. Available online: https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1316738/ (accessed on 26 December 2025).
- Aragona, K.M.; Dennis, T.S.; Suarez-Mena, F.X.; Quigley, J.D.; Hu, W.; Hill, T.M.; Schlotterbeck, R.L. Effect of Increasing the Amount of Hay Fed on Holstein Calf Performance and Digestibility from 2 to 4 Months of Age. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 1620–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poier, G.; Terler, G.; Klevenhusen, F.; Sharma, S.; Zebeli, Q. Replacing Concentrates with a High-Quality Hay in the Starter Feed of Dairy Calves: II. Effects on the Development of Chewing and Gut Fermentation, and Selected Systemic Health Variables. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 3113–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Toledo, A.F.; da Silva, A.P.; Poczynek, M.; Coelho, M.G.; Silva, M.D.; Polizel, D.M.; Reis, M.E.; Virgínio, G.F.; Millen, D.D.; Bittar, C.M.M. Whole-Flint Corn Grain or Tropical Grass Hay Free Choice in the Diet of Dairy Calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 10083–10098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, M.; Ren, Y.; He, G.; Wei, Y.; Lu, A.; Wang, J.; et al. A Novel Functional Feed Additive Derived from Natural Protein and Organic Acid via Puffing-Assisted Co-Extrusion: Enhancing Palatability and Modulating Gut Microbiome for Sustainable Animal Nutrition. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 526, 171468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.J.; Larsen, M.; Weisbjerg, M.R.; Johansen, M.; Hellwing, A.L.F.; Lund, P. Effects of Particle Size and Toasting of Fava Beans and Forage Source on Nutrient Digestibility, Ruminal Fermentation, and Metabolizable Protein Supply in Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 8806–8823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.Z.H.; Wei, C.X.; Liang, Y.Y.; Liang, H.; Gao, X.; Yan, Q.; Qiu, Y.; Zou, C. Effects of Replacing Peanut Stalks with Dried Sugarcane Leaves on Growth Performance, Apparent Nutrient Digestibility, and Rumen Fermentation Parameters in Weaned Buffalo Calves. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2025, 37, 6880–6889. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Want, E.J.; O’Maille, G.; Smith, C.A.; Brandon, T.R.; Uritboonthai, W.; Qin, C.; Trauger, S.A.; Siuzdak, G. Solvent-Dependent Metabolite Distribution, Clustering, and Protein Extraction for Serum Profiling with Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barri, T.; Dragsted, L.O. UPLC-ESI-QTOF/MS and Multivariate Data Analysis for Blood Plasma and Serum Metabolomics: Effect of Experimental Artefacts and Anticoagulant. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 768, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, C.A.; Want, E.J.; O’Maille, G.; Abagyan, R.; Siuzdak, G. XCMS: Processing Mass Spectrometry Data for Metabolite Profiling Using Nonlinear Peak Alignment, Matching, and Identification. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Development Core R Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical ComputingTeam RDCVienna, Austria2006. In Vienna Austria R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Development Core R Team: Vienna, Austria, 2013; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Peña, A.G.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I.; et al. QIIME Allows Analysis of High-Throughput Community Sequencing Data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, B.; Mei, Z.; Zeng, C.; Liu, S. metaX: A Flexible and Comprehensive Software for Processing Metabolomics Data. BMC Bioinform. 2017, 18, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mizrahi, I.; Wallace, R.J.; Moraïs, S. The Rumen Microbiome: Balancing Food Security and Environmental Impacts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 553–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morgavi, D.P.; Kelly, W.J.; Janssen, P.H.; Attwood, G.T. Rumen Microbial (Meta)Genomics and Its Application to Ruminant Production. Animal 2013, 7, 184–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flint, H.J.; Bayer, E.A.; Rincon, M.T.; Lamed, R.; White, B.A. Polysaccharide Utilization by Gut Bacteria: Potential for New Insights from Genomic Analysis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henderson, G.; Cox, F.; Ganesh, S.; Jonker, A.; Young, W.; Janssen, P.H. Rumen Microbial Community Composition Varies with Diet and Host, but a Core Microbiome Is Found across a Wide Geographical Range. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14567, Erratum in Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chai, J.; Weiss, C.P.; Beck, P.A.; Zhao, W.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J. Diet and Monensin Influence the Temporal Dynamics of the Rumen Microbiome in Stocker and Finishing Cattle. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2024, 15, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bach, A.; López-García, A.; González-Recio, O.; Elcoso, G.; Fàbregas, F.; Chaucheyras-Durand, F.; Castex, M. Changes in the Rumen and Colon Microbiota and Effects of Live Yeast Dietary Supplementation during the Transition from the Dry Period to Lactation of Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 6180–6198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emu, Q.; Guan, H.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, L.; Fan, J.; Ji, Y.; Lin, Y.; Li, C.; Dan, X.; Aguo, Y.; et al. Grazing and Supplementation of Dietary Yeast Probiotics Shape the Gut Microbiota and Improve the Immunity of Black Fattening Goats (Capra Hircus). Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 666837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rizzatti, G.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Gibiino, G.; Binda, C.; Gasbarrini, A. Proteobacteria: A Common Factor in Human Diseases. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 9351507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- da Rosa Dias, K.K.; Tochetto, C.; Varela, A.P.M.; Loiko, M.R.; Dos Santos, A.C.; Frazzon, J.; Roehe, P.M.; Mayer, F.Q. Impact of Weaning on Piglet Microbiota: Differences in Bacterial Taxa and Metabolic Pathways Associated with Diarrhea. Microb. Pathog. 2025, 207, 107878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, J.; Zhang, X.; Tan, Z.; Jiao, J.; Zhou, C. Microbiome-Host Co-Oscillation Patterns in Shaping Ruminal Ecosystem from Birth to Puberty in a Goat Model. Sci. China Life Sci. 2026, 69, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Zhan, J.; Zhao, S.; Jiang, H.; Jia, H.; Pan, Y.; Zhong, X.; Huo, J. Sex-Induced Alterations in Rumen Microbial Communities and Metabolite Profiles: Implications for Lamb Body Weight. BMC Microbiol. 2025, 25, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Ma, T.; Zhang, N.; Deng, K.; Diao, Q. Dietary Fat Supplement Affected Energy and Nitrogen Metabolism Efficiency and Shifted Rumen Fermentation toward Glucogenic Propionate Production via Enrichment of Succiniclasticum in Male Twin Lambs. J. Integr. Agric. 2025, 24, 1285–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Reau, A.J.; Suen, G. The Ruminococci: Key Symbionts of the Gut Ecosystem. J. Microbiol. 2018, 56, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddy, P.R.K.; Hyder, I. Ruminant Digestion. In Textbook of Veterinary Physiology; Das, P.K., Sejian, V., Mukherjee, J., Banerjee, D., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 353–366. [Google Scholar]
- Owens, F.N.; Secrist, D.S.; Hill, W.J.; Gill, D.R. Acidosis in Cattle: A Review. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.S.; Wang, R.; Ma, Z.Y.; Zhang, X.M.; Jiao, J.Z.; Zhang, Z.G.; Ungerfeld, E.M.; Yi, K.L.; Zhang, B.Z.; Long, L.; et al. Dietary Selection of Metabolically Distinct Microorganisms Drives Hydrogen Metabolism in Ruminants. ISME J. 2022, 16, 2535–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, G.; Bazer, F.W.; Satterfield, M.C.; Gilbreath, K.R.; Posey, E.A.; Sun, Y. L-Arginine Nutrition and Metabolism in Ruminants. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2022, 1354, 177–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flores, T.; Todd, C.D.; Tovar-Mendez, A.; Dhanoa, P.K.; Correa-Aragunde, N.; Hoyos, M.E.; Brownfield, D.M.; Mullen, R.T.; Lamattina, L.; Polacco, J.C. Arginase-Negative Mutants of Arabidopsis Exhibit Increased Nitric Oxide Signaling in Root Development. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 1936–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brauc, S.; De Vooght, E.; Claeys, M.; Geuns, J.M.C.; Höfte, M.; Angenon, G. Overexpression of Arginase in Arabidopsis Thaliana Influences Defence Responses against Botrytis Cinerea. Plant Biol. 2012, 14, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources; Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle: Eighth Revised Edition; National Academies Press (US): Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Price, M.N.; Deutschbauer, A.M.; Arkin, A.P. GapMind: Automated Annotation of Amino Acid Biosynthesis. mSystems 2020, 5, e00291-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Lu, Z.; Qi, R.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, Y.; Zafar, M.H.; Yang, K.; Wang, M. Illumina Sequencing and Metabolomic Analysis Explored the Effects of the Mixed Silage of Rice Straw and Chinese Cabbage Waste on Fecal Microorganisms and Metabolites in Hu Sheep. Fermentation 2024, 10, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, T.Y.; Yang, J.J. Non-Targeted Metabolomic Profile of Leuconostoc Mesenteroides-Fermented Milk Reveals Differentially Expressed Metabolites Associated with Electro-Fermentation. Microb. Cell Factories 2025, 24, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tassone, G.; Carradori, S.; Maramai, S.; D’Agostino, I. Chapter 2.5 Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT); Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Rich, B.E.; Jackson, J.C.; de Ora, L.O.; Long, Z.G.; Uyeda, K.S.; Bess, E.N. Alternative Pathway for Dopamine Production by Acetogenic Gut Bacteria That O-Demethylate 3-Methoxytyramine, a Metabolite of Catechol O-Methyltransferase. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 1697–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Tang, P.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Y. Alterations in Rumen Bacterial Community and Metabolome Characteristics of Cashmere Goats in Response to Dietary Nutrient Density. Animals 2020, 10, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guan, F.; Liu, J.; Zhou, L.; Tong, Q.; Wu, N.; Tu, T.; Wang, Y.; Yao, B.; Luo, H.; Tian, J.; et al. Strain-Resolved Comparison of Beef and Draft Cattle Rumen Microbiomes Using Single-Microbe Genomics. Anim. Microbiome 2025, 7, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Items | S15PV | S22.5PV | S30PV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredients | |||
| Corn | 32.00 | 32.00 | 32.00 |
| Soybean meal | 30.40 | 30.40 | 30.40 |
| Limestone | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| CaHPO4 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| NaCl | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| sugarcane dry leaves | 15.00 | 22.50 | 30.00 |
| Peanut vine | 15.00 | 7.50 | 0.00 |
| Premix (1) | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Nutrient levels (2) | |||
| DM (air-dry basis) | 94.43 | 92.85 | 92.10 |
| NEmf/(MJ/kg) | 10.45 | 10.34 | 10.13 |
| CP | 22.50 | 21.00 | 19.10 |
| EE | 2.60 | 2.58 | 2.56 |
| NDF | 35.49 | 37.23 | 41.37 |
| ADF | 13.38 | 14.94 | 16.32 |
| Ca | 0.83 | 0.95 | 1.12 |
| P | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.49 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wei, C.; Gao, X.; Wang, R.; Yan, Q.; Gu, Q.; Liang, Y.; Qiu, D.; Tan, Y.; Luo, H.; Tang, Q.; et al. Effects of Roughage Combinations of Sugarcane Dry Leaves and Peanut Vine on the Rumen Microbial Community and Metabolites of Weaned Buffalo Calves. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14051050
Wei C, Gao X, Wang R, Yan Q, Gu Q, Liang Y, Qiu D, Tan Y, Luo H, Tang Q, et al. Effects of Roughage Combinations of Sugarcane Dry Leaves and Peanut Vine on the Rumen Microbial Community and Metabolites of Weaned Buffalo Calves. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(5):1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14051050
Chicago/Turabian StyleWei, Caixiang, Xin Gao, Ruizhanghui Wang, Qi Yan, Qichao Gu, Yuyang Liang, Dongwen Qiu, Yongqi Tan, Huadong Luo, Qingfeng Tang, and et al. 2026. "Effects of Roughage Combinations of Sugarcane Dry Leaves and Peanut Vine on the Rumen Microbial Community and Metabolites of Weaned Buffalo Calves" Microorganisms 14, no. 5: 1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14051050
APA StyleWei, C., Gao, X., Wang, R., Yan, Q., Gu, Q., Liang, Y., Qiu, D., Tan, Y., Luo, H., Tang, Q., Yan, Z., Chen, J., & Zou, C. (2026). Effects of Roughage Combinations of Sugarcane Dry Leaves and Peanut Vine on the Rumen Microbial Community and Metabolites of Weaned Buffalo Calves. Microorganisms, 14(5), 1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14051050

