Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Each Three Entamoeba histolytica- and Strongyloides stercoralis-Specific Real-Time PCR Assays Applying Test Comparisons Without Reference Standards
Previous Article in Journal
Bacterial Isolates from Avocado Orchards with Different Agronomic Management Systems with Potential for Promoting Plant Growth in Tomate and Phytopathogen Control
Previous Article in Special Issue
Early Warning Approach to Identify Positive Cases of SARS-CoV-2 in School Settings in Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

pDNA Impurities in mRNA Vaccines

1
Department of Life Sciences, Health, and Health Care Professions, School of Medicine and Surgery, Link Campus University, 00165 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Balamand University, 00100 Tripoli, Lebanon
3
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Balamand University, 00100 Tripoli, Lebanon
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(9), 1975; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13091975 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 19 August 2025 / Revised: 21 August 2025 / Accepted: 22 August 2025 / Published: 24 August 2025
Funded during the emergency phase of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines are single-stranded, 5′-capped mRNAs produced using a cell-free in vitro transcription from the corresponding plasmid DNA (pDNA) templates, encoding the viral spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 [1,2]. The expression construct, i.e., the linearized plasmid, is designed to contain regulatory sequences that act as promoter and enhancer regions of the S gene, in order to obtain a significant amount of stable mRNA, which can then be translated into the S protein once inoculated (Figure 1). During the manufacturing process, a nanoscale portion of this pDNA ends up in the vaccine vials in the form of pDNA impurities, which must not exceed a concentration of 10 ηg per dose, as established by the World Health Organization (WHO) [3]. Respecting this limit appears to be of pivotal importance to guarantee high safety standards for human health and thus prevent hypothetical adverse events or reactions.
On 5 August 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the beginning of a coordinated reduction in its mRNA vaccine development activities under the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), including contract termination, de-scoping of mRNA-related work in existing contracts, rejection or cancellation of multiple pre-award solicitations, and restructuring of collaborations [4]. As HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. stated, this affects 22 projects worth nearly $500 million, while other uses of mRNA technology within the Department have not been impacted [4]. Among the reasons for this announcement is BARDA’s intention to move toward vaccine platforms with stronger safety records, an aspect that has once again brought attention to the potential health risks of mRNA vaccines [5,6,7,8,9].
Although mRNA technology is remarkable and designed to be safe and effective at the same time [10,11,12,13], news of the presence of DNA impurities in mRNA vaccine vials has caused a stir [14]. These impurities, in fact, derive from the pDNA used as a template in the production of the vaccine itself (Figure 1). Some researchers argue that they were at concentrations permitted by the WHO and regulatory authorities (<10 ηg/dose) [15,16], others claim that they were well above the maximum limit even after the purification process [14].
Beyond this controversy [14,15,16,17], questions arise about the impact of these pDNA impurities on health, whether they can trigger innate immunity in genetically predisposed subjects, become incorporated into the DNA of human cells at risk of neoplastic transformation, or evoke an antibody response to some extent while outside the cell. As is known, the human body is able to generate antibodies against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) or single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), found in numerous rheumatological diseases, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus [18], as well as toxic diffuse goiter and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis [19], diabetes mellitus [20], and autoimmune hepatitis [21]. Since all these diseases have also been reported after the administration of mRNA vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29], further research on this topic is warranted. Just this year, a retrospective study on 98 patients has shown that combining a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine with a COVID-19 vaccine made from inactivated whole viral particles significantly stimulates the production of anti-dsDNA [30], a finding which deserves further investigation on a larger scale.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.R.; methodology, L.R.; software, L.R., N.G., and K.K.; validation, L.R.; formal analysis, L.R.; investigation, L.R.; resources, L.R.; data curation, L.R.; writing—original draft preparation, L.R.; writing—review and editing, L.R., N.G., and J.G.; visualization, L.R. and N.G.; supervision, L.R.; project administration, L.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
SARS-CoV-2Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
mRNAMessenger RNA
pDNAPlasmid DNA
SSpike
WHOWorld Health Organization
HHSHealth and Human Services
BARDABiomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
dsDNADouble-stranded DNA
ssDNASingle-stranded DNA
COVID-19Coronavirus disease 2019
UTRsUntranslated regions

References

  1. European Medicines Agency (EMA), Comirnaty (COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine). Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/comirnaty-epar-product-information_en.pdf (accessed on 14 August 2025).
  2. European Medicines Agency (EMA), Spikevax (previously COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna). Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/spikevax-epar-product-information_en.pdf (accessed on 18 August 2025).
  3. World Health Organization (WHO), WHO Study Group on Cell Substrates for Production of Biologicals. Available online: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/biologicals/cell-substrates/cells.final.mtgrep.ik.26_sep_07.pdf?sfvrsn=3db7d37a_3&download=true (accessed on 11 June 2007).
  4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), HHS winds down mRNA Vaccine Development under BARDA. Available online: https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-winds-down-mrna-development-under-barda.html (accessed on 5 August 2025).
  5. Choi, J.Y.; Lee, Y.; Park, N.G.; Kim, M.S.; Rhie, S.J. Serious safety signals and prediction features following COVID-19 mRNA vaccines using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tachita, T.; Takahata, T.; Yamashita, S.; Ebina, T.; Kamata, K.; Yamagata, K.; Tamai, Y.; Sakuraba, H. Newly diagnosed extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type, at the injected left arm after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Int. J. Hematol. 2023, 118, 503–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ukishima, S.; Miyagami, T.; Arikawa, M.; Kushiro, S.; Takaku, T.; Naito, T. Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma post-mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccination. Clin. Case Rep. 2023, 11, 7143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Roncati, L.; Manenti, A.; Corsi, L. A three-case series of thrombotic deaths in patients over 50 with comorbidities temporally after modRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Pathogens 2022, 11, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fraiman, J.; Erviti, J.; Jones, M.; Greenland, S.; Whelan, P.; Kaplan, R.M.; Doshi, P. Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults. Vaccine 2022, 40, 5798–5805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Roncati, L.; Galeazzi, C.; Bartolacelli, G.; Caramaschi, S. A real-world nationwide study on COVID-19 trend in Italy during the autumn-winter season of 2020 (before mass vaccination) and 2021 (after mass vaccination) integrated with a retrospective analysis of the mortality burden per year. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Roncati, L.; Huo, Q.T. Editorial: Post COVID-19: The nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) platform. Front. Med. 2024, 10, 1324610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kwon, S.; Kwon, M.; Im, S.; Lee, K.; Lee, H. mRNA vaccines: The most recent clinical applications of synthetic mRNA. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2022, 45, 245–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Roncati, L.; Corsi, L. Nucleoside-modified messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine platform. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 4054–4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. König, B.; Kirchner, J.O. Methodological considerations regarding the quantification of DNA impurities in the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine Comirnaty®. Methods Protoc. 2024, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kaiser, S.; Kaiser, S.; Reis, J.; Marschalek, R. Quantification of objective concentrations of DNA impurities in mRNA vaccines. Vaccine 2025, 55, 127022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vieths, S.; Waibler, Z.; Schumann, G.G. Opting for the appropriate methodology for quantification of residual DNA impurities in mRNA vaccines. Vaccine 2025, 56, 127186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Methods and Protocols Editorial Office. Expression of concern: König, B.; Kirchner, J.O. Methodological considerations regarding the quantification of DNA impurities in the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Comirnaty®. Methods Protoc. 2024, 7, 41. Methods Protoc. 2025, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, W.X.; Pan, H.F.; Li, L.H.; Zhang, N.; Li, J.; Fan, Y.G.; Feng, J.B.; Tang, X.W.; Chen, H.; Li, X.P.; et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of 15 autoantibodies in patients with new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2010, 179, 623–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pedro, A.B.; Romaldini, J.H.; Americo, C.; Takei, K. Association of circulating antibodies against double-stranded and single-stranded DNA with thyroid autoantibodies in Graves’ disease and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis patients. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2006, 114, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Triolo, G.; Palumbo, A.A.; Giardina, E.; Davi, G.; Triolo, G. Anti platelet property of anti-single-stranded DNA antibodies in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res. 1994, 26, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Czaja, A.J.; Morshed, S.A.; Parveen, S.; Nishioka, M. Antibodies to single-stranded and double-stranded DNA in antinuclear antibody-positive type 1-autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 1997, 26, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sagy, I.; Zeller, L.; Raviv, Y.; Porges, T.; Bieber, A.; Abu-Shakra, M. New-onset systemic lupus erythematosus following BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: A case series and literature review. Rheumatol. Int. 2022, 42, 2261–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jung, S.W.; Jeon, J.J.; Kim, Y.H.; Choe, S.J.; Lee, S. Long-term risk of autoimmune diseases after mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a Korean, nationwide, population-based cohort study. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chee, Y.J.; Liew, H.; Hoi, W.H.; Lee, Y.; Lim, B.; Chin, H.X.; Lai, R.T.R.; Koh, Y.; Tham, M.; Seow, C.J.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination and Graves’ disease: A report of 12 cases and review of the literature. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 107, 2324–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Weintraub, M.A.; Ameer, B.; Sinha Gregory, N. Graves disease following the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: Case series. J. Investig. Med. High Impact Case Rep. 2021, 9, 23247096211063356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Paschou, S.A.; Karalis, V.; Psaltopoulou, T.; Vasileiou, V.; Charitaki, I.; Bagratuni, T.; Ktena, V.; Papandroulaki, F.; Gumeni, S.; Kassi, G.N.; et al. Patients with autoimmune thyroiditis present similar immunological response to COVID-19 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine with healthy subjects, while vaccination may affect thyroid function: A clinical study. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 840668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aydoğan, B.İ.; Ünlütürk, U.; Cesur, M. Type 1 diabetes mellitus following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Endocrine 2022, 78, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kim, J.H.; Chae, H.B.; Woo, S.; Song, M.S.; Kim, H.J.; Woo, C.G. Clinicopathological characteristics of autoimmune-like hepatitis induced by COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech, BNT162b2): A case report and literature review. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2023, 31, 1156–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Guo, M.; Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Li, Q. Insights into new-onset autoimmune diseases after COVID-19 vaccination. Autoimmun. Rev. 2023, 22, 103340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dişli, F.; Yılmaz, Y.; Yıldız, S. The effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on antinuclear autoantibody formation in individuals without prior COVID-19 infection. Hum. Immunol. 2025, 86, 111332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The linearized ds-pDNA used for the synthesis of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (above) consists of a promoter, to which RNA polymerase binds, an enhancer, two untranslated regions (UTRs) at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the S gene, a transcription terminator, and the gene encoding the S protein of SARS-CoV-2; the corresponding ss-mRNA (below) contains the S gene transcript to be translated into the S protein, the two UTRs, and a 5′ cap plus a poly(A) tail, both introduced by RNA polymerase to protect the transcript from degradation.
Figure 1. The linearized ds-pDNA used for the synthesis of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (above) consists of a promoter, to which RNA polymerase binds, an enhancer, two untranslated regions (UTRs) at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the S gene, a transcription terminator, and the gene encoding the S protein of SARS-CoV-2; the corresponding ss-mRNA (below) contains the S gene transcript to be translated into the S protein, the two UTRs, and a 5′ cap plus a poly(A) tail, both introduced by RNA polymerase to protect the transcript from degradation.
Microorganisms 13 01975 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roncati, L.; Ghaleb, N.; Ghaleb, J.; Kfoury, K. pDNA Impurities in mRNA Vaccines. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1975. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13091975

AMA Style

Roncati L, Ghaleb N, Ghaleb J, Kfoury K. pDNA Impurities in mRNA Vaccines. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(9):1975. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13091975

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roncati, Luca, Nazha Ghaleb, Joya Ghaleb, and Karl Kfoury. 2025. "pDNA Impurities in mRNA Vaccines" Microorganisms 13, no. 9: 1975. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13091975

APA Style

Roncati, L., Ghaleb, N., Ghaleb, J., & Kfoury, K. (2025). pDNA Impurities in mRNA Vaccines. Microorganisms, 13(9), 1975. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13091975

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop