Next Article in Journal
Antibiotic Resistance in Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis and Bifidobacterium longum: Definition of Sensitivity/Resistance Profiles at the Species Level
Previous Article in Journal
Gut Microbiota Diversity in 16 Stingless Bee Species (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biology and Application of Chaetomium globosum as a Biocontrol Agent: Current Status and Future Prospects

1
Faculty of Forensic Sciences, Mandsaur University, SH-31, Mhow–Neemuch By-Pass Square, Rewas-Dewda Road, Mandsaur 458001, India
2
Ministry of Ayush, Ayush Bhawan, New Delhi 110023, India
3
Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan 173229, India
4
Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(7), 1646; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071646
Submission received: 25 June 2025 / Revised: 8 July 2025 / Accepted: 8 July 2025 / Published: 11 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Microbe Interactions)

Abstract

Chaetomium globosum is a widely distributed fungal species recognized for its ability to produce a range of secondary metabolites. This fungus plays a significant ecological role by degrading organic matter and contributing to nutrient cycling in diverse ecosystems. In recent years, C. globosum has attracted considerable scientific interest due to its potential as a biocontrol agent [BCA] against a wide array of diseases in numerous plant species. While the precise mechanisms of C. globosum as a BCA remain poorly understood, interference competition through antibiosis is one of the key mechanisms. Moreover, C. globosum can enhance plant health by promoting nutrient availability, manipulating the rhizosphere microbiome, and inducing plant defense responses. The formulation of C. globosum for agricultural applications has been reported, which can significantly improve stability and efficacy under field conditions. However, despite significant advancements in omics and molecular biology technologies, the biology of C. globosum is understudied. Enhanced research into the genetics and functional genomics of C. globosum could pave the way for its applications in sustainable agriculture. This review summarizes the role of C. globosum as a BCA, focusing on its underlying mechanisms such as genomics and transcriptomics, and the effects of C. globosum application on soil health and the rhizosphere microbiome.

1. Introduction

Chaetomium globosum is a saprotrophic filamentous fungus which belongs to the family Chaetomiaceae under the order Sordariales. Known for its strong cellulolytic activity, this fungus is widespread across various environments and ecological niches, mainly thriving in soil, decomposing organic matter, and cellulose-rich plant material. It plays a crucial role in nutrient cycling in ecosystems. Beyond its ecological significance, C. globosum has attracted substantial interest due to its production of a range of compounds with activity against various pathogens, including fungi and nematodes [1,2,3]. In addition, C. globosum can parasitize fungal hosts and colonize plant roots, promoting plant growth and defense responses [4,5]. Due to these attributes, this fungus is recognized as a promising biological control agent [BCA] against root and foliar fungal plant pathogens and nematodes responsible for various plant diseases affecting crop yields and quality [4,5]. This review provides an in-depth examination of several critical areas of C. globosum, including its mode of action as a BCA and its underlying mechanisms, including genomics and transcriptomics. Additionally, this review explores the advancement in C. globosum taxonomy, and formulation for large-scale field and greenhouse applications.

2. Chaetomium globosum as an Effective Biocontrol Agent

The term “biological control” [or “biocontrol”] refers to the management of various types of pests, including insect pests, crop pathogens, weeds, and nematodes, using naturally occurring microbes [6]. Over the past century, the practices and concepts of biological control have evolved into distinct streams, each associated with specific scientific and taxonomic disciplines. Parallel developments have increased references to biological control in industrial contexts and legislation, resulting in conceptual and terminological fragmentation. Aligning with recent terminology updates proposed by Sternberg et al. [6], this review defines biological control as the use of living organisms to manage plant pathogens and diseases. While BCAs refer specifically to living organisms, products based on non-living, nature-derived substances are considered a separate category under the umbrella of bio-protection [6]. Based on its application, biological control can be classified into four categories: natural biological control, conservation biological control, classical biological control, and augmentative biological control. Natural and conservation biocontrol involve resident organisms with or without human interventions, respectively. Classical and augmentative biocontrol consists of the application of additional organisms with the intention of their permanent and temporary establishment, respectively [6].
Chaetomium globosum has been identified as an effective BCA against a variety of soil- and air-borne fungal and oomycete plant pathogens that cause foliar and root diseases, both in greenhouse and field conditions [4,5]. Notable examples of these diseases include wheat and barley spot blotch caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana [7,8]; ascochyta blight disease of chickpea caused by Ascochyta rabiei [9]; root rot in citrus caused by Phytophthora nicotianae [10]; tomato leaf spot disease caused by Alternaria alternata [11]; potato late blight disease caused by Phytophthora infestans [12]; root rot of date palm caused by Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium chlamydosporum, and Neocosmospora solani [13]; and fusarium crown rot [FCR] symptoms in wheat seedlings [14].
Chaetomium globosum has been used as a seed treatment to combat soil-borne diseases affecting corn seedlings caused by Fusarium roseum [15,16]. Similarly, wheat seeds coated with spore suspensions have exhibited improved germination rates, reduced fusarium root rot disease, and increased wheat yields [14]. In growth chamber experiments, an ascospore suspension of C. globosum effectively controlled apple scab caused by Venturia inaequalis (Cke.) Wint. when applied as a foliar treatment [17,18]. Similarly, a C. globosum formulation composed of colloidal cellulose showed a significant biocontrol effect against apple scab, flyspeck (caused by Zygophiala jamaicensis E. Mason), and sooty blotch (caused by Phyllachora pomigena) under greenhouse and field conditions [19]. Biocontrol of Alternaria raphani and Alternaria brassicicola on radish seedlings and pod infection and Apple scab disease caused by V. inaequalis by C. globosum has also been reported [20]. In addition, spray application of C. globosum ascospore suspension in the open field significantly reduces the perithecial formation and survival of the soybean stem canker pathogen Diaporthe phaseolorum f. sp. meridionalis on soybean stubble [21]. A summary of plant diseases controlled by C. globosum under greenhouse and field conditions is given in Table 1.
The biocontrol effect of C. globosum against various plant-parasitic nematodes is also shown. For example, tuber treatment and soil application of C. globosum reduced potato cyst nematode Globodera rostochiensis [42]. Similarly, seed treatment of C. globosum reduced gall formation in cucumber seedlings [43], inhibited the root knot nematode (RKN) Meloidogyne incognita infection, and reduced female reproduction in cotton roots [44,45].
The following report presents case studies that illustrate the successful use of C. globosum in combating root and crown rot, as well as foliar pathogens. These examples highlight its effectiveness under both field and polyhouse conditions.
Field trials involving C. globosum, two wheat varieties (Aikang 58 and Bainong 207), and the FCR pathogen Fusarium pseudograminearum were conducted at three locations (Kaifeng, Wenxian, and Neihuang) in China between 2018 and 2022. The results exhibited variable biocontrol efficacy [26–73%] depending on the year, location, and wheat variety used [14]. During the 2018 field trials at Kaifeng, wheat seeds from the variety Bainong 207 treated with C. globosum showed a significant 43% reduction in FCR disease and a 3.2% increase in yield compared to the control. During the field trials in China using two wheat varieties Aikang 58 and Bainong 207 at two locations [Wenxian and Neihuang], C. globosum treatments resulted in a significant reduction in FCR disease by 70% and 28.0%. This resulted in an increase of 10.7% and 11.9% in yield, respectively, compared to the control [14]. These results are comparable to those obtained using a seed coating treatment with the chemical agent difenoconazole, which was used as a positive control in the same experiment.
Two field trials were conducted in the regions of Perar and Nanjanad, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India, to evaluate the effectiveness of the C. globosum liquid formulation against potato late blight disease caused by the oomycete pathogen P. infestans [12]. The liquid formulation was applied as a tuber treatment, soil application, and two foliar spray applications, individually or in combination. The results showed an average reduction of 20–40% in the late blight disease index compared to the untreated control, which exhibited a 100% disease index. The combined application of tuber, soil, and foliar treatments demonstrated a better biocontrol effect than individual applications. Furthermore, the application of C. globosum enhanced tuber yield (averaging 28.3 t/ha) compared to the untreated control (16.0 t/ha). The biocontrol efficacy of C. globosum was compared to fungicide application, where metalaxyl + mancozeb (0.2%) was used as a tuber treatment and applied twice as foliar treatments. However, tuber yield was comparatively higher with the chemical treatment (31.3 t/ha) [12].
Varsha and co-authors evaluated the biocontrol efficacy of the liquid formulation of C. globosum alone and in combination with an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) against the soil-borne pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina on strawberries under polyhouse conditions in Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India [46]. The application of C. globosum formulation via basal application, seedling dip, and soil drenching decreased M. phaseolina root rot disease by 51% compared to the control. However, the combined application of C. globosum and AMF resulted in a 74% higher disease reduction [46].

3. Biocontrol Mechanism of Chaetomium globosum

Biocontrol of plant diseases is a complex process that involves the interaction between BCAs and pests or pathogens, plant hosts, and the environment. Hence, biocontrol relies on a range of mechanisms, including direct parasitism of pathogens (hyperparasitism), exploitation competition for nutrients and space, and interference competition through antibiosis [6,47]. For this, BCAs regulate their genetic machinery and produce a variety of secondary metabolites, hydrolytic enzymes, and small secreted proteins [48,49]. Small RNA [sRNAs]-mediated RNA silencing has been shown to regulate the production of such compounds and enzymes [50,51,52,53,54]. In addition, BCA can establish itself in plant tissues and live endophytically, triggering induced systemic resistance [47]. Based on the available literature, it is evident that interference competition through antibiosis is the primary mechanism employed by C. globosum for biocontrol interactions. Here, we explore the contribution of these mechanisms to the biocontrol ability of C. globosum (Figure 1).

3.1. Antibiosis

The production of antifungal metabolites and enzymes is considered an essential factor in interference and exploitative competition as well as hyperparasitism [47,49]. Chaetomium globosum is known for producing a variety of secondary metabolites with diverse biological activities [3]. However, this review focuses on the secondary metabolites identified for their antifungal activity against plant pathogenic fungi and nematodes.
Antibiosis is regarded as a crucial biocontrol trait of C. globosum and has attracted significant attention. Evidence of the antagonistic ability of C. globosum has mainly been found through in vitro assays, including dual-culture and culture filtrate tests using crude extracts and purified metabolites. For example, an in vitro dual-culture test revealed a strong antagonistic effect of C. globosum against the foliar pathogens of several plant species, including rice, maize, wheat and tomato [11,34,55,56,57,58]. Additionally, C. globosum is an effective antagonists against soil-borne pathogens causing root rot and wilt, including Phytophthora spp. [10,59,60] and Fusarium spp. [61,62].
Several metabolites have been isolated and identified from various C. globosum strains [1,3,7]. Chaetoglobosins and Chaetoviridins are the most studied metabolites for their antifungal activities against plant pathogens. Chaetoglobosins are one of the major secondary metabolites produced by C. globosum. These metabolites are known for several biological activities, including antifungal and nematocidal [1,63,64]. The biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) for Chaetoglobosins has been identified in C. globosum, which contains a polyketide PKS-NRPS gene (cheA), an enoyl reductase gene [cheB], two genes coding cytochrome P450 oxygenase (cheD and cheG), a FAD-dependent monooxygenase gene (cheE), and two genes encoding the putative Zn[II]~2~Cys~6~ transcription factors (cheC and chef) [65,66]. CgLaeA and CgcheR transcription factors positively regulate the biosynthesis of Chaetoglobosin. At the same time, the basic helix–loop–helix family regulator CgXpp1 and the putative C2H2 transcription factor CgTF6 have been identified as negative regulators [67,68,69,70]. Several studies have revealed that chaetoglobosins exhibit significant inhibitory activity against plant pathogenic fungi.
Chaetoviridins are another major compound isolated from C. globosum [39,71,72]. Chaetoviridins A and B have been shown for antifungal effect against S. sclerotiorum, R. solani, Magnaporthe grisea, P. ultimum, Puccinia recondita and V. dahliae [39,66,72,73,74]. Additionally, these compounds have been reported for their antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea, Phytophthora capsici, Fusarium graminearum, and Fusarium moniliforme [39,72]. Another study found that Chaetoviridin A treatment applied to V. dahlia caused cell necrosis, mycelial deformation, production of reactive oxygen species and nitrous oxide, and inhibition of microsclerotia germination [39]. Chaetoviridin is a polyketide, and the BGC of Chaetoviridin biosynthesis has been identified and characterized, consisting of 16 genes including two core genes encoding the HR-PKS (cazF) and NR-PKS (cazM) [75], which contribute to the polyketide backbone biosynthesis.
Other metabolites such as 4-methyl-[1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl]-benzene, tetradecane, dodecane, hexadecane, β-bisabolene, and dimethyl-propyl-disulphide have been reported to have antifungal properties. These metabolites were found to be effective against soil-borne fungal pathogens S. sclerotiorum, S. rolfsii, M. phaseolina, and F. oxysporum using the dual-culture technique [76]. Similarly, ethyl acetate and methanol extracts of C. globosum containing twenty-six secondary metabolites showed strong antifungal activity against S. sclerotiorum [77].
Secondary metabolites—including chaetoglobosin A, chaetoglobosin B, chaetocin, chaetoviridin, and chaetomugilin produced by C. globosum—have also been shown to have nematocidal activity against the RKNs M. incognita and Meloidogyne javanica [64,78,79,80]. The culture filtrate of C. globosum, containing chaetoglobosin A and chaetomin showed a significant biocontrol effect against the RKN M. incognita in tomato [64]. Additionally, polysaccharides with antibacterial activities have also been identified in C. globosum [81,82].

3.2. Mycoparasitism and Hyperparasitism

Mycoparasitism is a lifestyle in which one fungus establishes parasitic interactions with another fungus. A fungus that can parasitize other fungi is called a mycoparasite, and the fungus that acts as a parasitized host is called a fungal host (mycohosts). If the host is also a parasite, e.g., a plant pathogen, the interaction is known as hyperparasitic interaction or hyperparasitism. This interaction can be biotrophic when a mycoparasite gains nutrients from the living host fungus or necrotrophic when a mycoparasite kills the host fungus and feeds on the dead fungal biomass [47].
There are limited reports on mycoparasitic interactions between C. globosum and fungal hosts. In these reports, the mycoparasitic behaviour of C. globosum is characterized by attachment to the hyphae of fungal hosts, coiling around them, and overgrowing on mycelial colonies of fungal hosts during agar plate interaction studies [10]. The hyphae of C. globosum have been shown to penetrate the hyphae of Phytophthora nicotianae, resulting in the degradation and discolouration of pathogenic colonies [10]. Hyperparasitism of wheat spot blot pathogen Cochliobolus sativus by C. globosum has also been reported during dual culture interactions [7]. Similarly, Moya et al. [83] demonstrated that C. globosum effectively parasitizes the mycelium of B. sorokiniana, the causative agent of spot blotch in barley, significantly reducing its viability and pathogenicity [83,84].

3.3. Competition for Nutrients and Space

C. globosum employs competitive exclusion as a strategy to establish itself in a particular environment, including the rhizosphere. It competes with phytopathogenic fungi for essential nutrients and space. This competition can inhibit the growth and development of pathogens by depriving them of the resources necessary for survival. In vitro studies have shown that C. globosum can rapidly colonize substrates, effectively outcompeting pathogens such as the potato late blight pathogen P. infestans [85]. By occupying the ecological niche first and utilizing available nutrients, C. globosum prevents the establishment and proliferation of the pathogen [83].

3.4. Chaetomium globosum Genomics and Transcriptomics

Currently, the public domain lacks comprehensive genomic information on C. globosum, with only a draft genome sequence available for the strain CBS 148.51, which has an estimated genome size of 34.3 MB and a predicted 11,124 protein-coding genes [86]. The absence of this crucial information represents a significant gap in our understanding of the mode of action of C. globosum; hampers accurate species identification and classification; and impedes the efficient utilization of C. globosum strains. Furthermore, the lack of genomic information is a barrier to understanding the biocontrol mechanism and identifying genetic markers associated with biocontrol traits of C. globosum. The potential benefits of this data are immense, as it could significantly enhance research, application, and knowledge-based improvement of C. globosum as a biocontrol agent.
Comparing global gene expression patterns, in addition to genomics, in C. globosum during interactions with fungal and plant hosts (compared to non-interaction control) can provide vital clues for better understanding the underlying mechanisms of biocontrol interactions. Transcriptome analysis of C. globosum during in vitro dual-culture interaction with the wheat spot blotch pathogen B. sorokiniana using RNA-seq showed upregulation of a high proportion of genes associated with secondary metabolite biosynthesis [84]. These include genes coding for polyketide synthase, non-ribosomal peptide synthase, terpene cyclase, squalene epoxidase, ubiquinone biosynthesis methyltransferase, and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. This supports the consideration that interference competition through antibiosis is a vital mechanism of C. globosum biocontrol activity [4]. This result also underscores that the production of secondary metabolites is one of the primary mechanisms of the interference competition of C. globosum.
The gene associated with secondary metabolite production is often arranged in clusters and co-expressed [87]. Membrane transporters such as MFS [major facilitator superfamily] or ABC (ATP-binding cassette) membrane transporters are integral to secondary metabolite BGCs and contribute to the efflux of secondary metabolites after their biosynthesis [87]. A higher expression of secondary metabolite genes during antagonistic interactions is often accompanied by a higher expression of membrane transporters [49]. Transcriptome analysis by Darshan et al. [84] revealed higher expression of secondary metabolite biosynthesis genes coupled with increased expression of membrane transporters in C. globosum [84], indicating their potential role in secondary metabolite efflux. A higher expression of membrane transporters during antagonistic interactions is plausibly also related to the detoxification mechanisms of C. globosum against external toxic metabolites that might come from the host fungus as a defence response [49,88,89].
Cell wall-degrading enzymes, including chitinases, proteases, and glucanases, play an essential role in mycoparasitism [49]. Genes coding for hydrolytic enzymes such as glycosyl hydrolase [GH2, GH13, GH31 and GH81 family], chitinases, cellulases, b-1, 3-glucanases, glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucanase, and cellulase-binding domain-containing proteins and proteases (including peptidases and aminopeptidases) were significantly upregulated in C. globosum during interaction with B. sorokiniana [84]. A higher expression of these genes suggests their potential role in B. sorokiniana mycoparasitism. In summary, the findings of Darshan et al. [84] indicated the role of hydrolytic enzymes, secondary metabolites, and membrane transporters in the antagonistic interaction of C. globosum [84]. This supports the consideration that antibiosis and mycoparasitism are essential mechanisms of C. globosum’s biocontrol activity [4].

3.5. Induction of Plant Defense Response

The induction of the plant defense response by plant beneficial fungi is effective against various pathogens and pests and is called induced systemic resistance (ISR) [90,91]. ISR is often mediated by jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ET) and is salicylic acid (SA)-independent [90]. However, emerging evidence suggests that systemic resistance triggered by certain strains of Trichoderma, such as T. longibrachiatum, also involves SA signalling pathways [92]. Root colonization by C. globosum triggers a defense response [93,94,95]. Preliminary evidence suggests that C. globosum may induce plant resistance as a biocontrol mechanism in wheat against the tan spot pathogen Pyrenophora tritici-repentis and spot blotch pathogen B. sorokiniana [58,96]. More definitive proof comes from the work of Singh et al. [94], which demonstrated that applying C. globosum to tomato roots significantly reduced early blight disease caused by the foliar pathogen Alternaria solani [94].
Transcriptomic analyses of host plants such as tomatoes, cotton and cucumber during interactions with C. globosum have shed light on the molecular mechanisms by which C. globosum induces disease resistance in plants [93,94,95]. Transcriptome analysis of the tripartite interactions between C. globosum, the root pathogen V. dahliae, and cotton plants revealed the induced expression of genes linked to flavonoid and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathways, MAPK [mitogen-activated protein kinase] signalling, glutathione metabolism, and plant–pathogen interactions [93]. The role of phenylpropanoids and flavonoids, along with MAPK signalling, is well established in the defense mechanisms of cotton [97,98,99]. Additionally, genes associated with hormone biosynthesis, such JA, ET, and SA, were induced in cotton plants treated with C. globosum. In contrast, abscisic acid, auxin, and gibberellin levels were significantly elevated in C. globosum-treated plants following inoculation with V. dahliae [93]. These findings indicate that C. globosum can induce a defence response in cotton plants through various mechanisms involving secondary metabolites and hormone signalling pathways.
Similarly, transcriptome analysis of tomato leaves and cucumber roots treated with C. globosum revealed an upregulation of genes associated with various pathways, including phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, plant hormone signal transduction, plant–pathogen interactions, and the MAPK signalling pathway [94,95]. Singh et al. [94] showed that genes involved in JA biosynthesis were upregulated, whereas those related to ET biosynthesis were downregulated. This suggests that JA-mediated signalling actively contributes to ISR in tomatoes colonized by C. globosum. Additionally, genes related to SA biosynthesis, such as phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and phospholipase D (PLD), along with pathogenesis-related (PR) protein-coding genes were also upregulated in plants treated with C. globosum compared to untreated plants. These findings indicate that C. globosum can trigger both JA- and SA-dependent signalling pathways in tomato plants [94]. These findings were corroborated by the higher content of plant hormones, including indole-3-acetic acid, gibberellin, SA, and JA, in seedlings colonized by C. globosum compared to non-inoculated seedlings [95].

4. Chaetomium globosum as a Plant Growth Promoter

Emerging evidence has shown that C. globosum can colonize plant roots and live as endophytes [14,95,100]. Root colonization by C. globosum promotes plant growth and development and the overall yield of a variety of crops [14,95,100]. For example, C. globosum application promotes plant length and biomass of Salvia miltiorrhiza [100]; enhances plant growth promotion; and also enhances plant biomass and yield of tomato, cotton, cucumber, and Chinese crab and apple plants [94,95,101,102]. Similarly, the application of C. globosum to potato tuber and direct soil application resulted in significantly higher seed germination and enhanced plant length and tuber yield in the presence of R. solani under field and greenhouse conditions [103]. The plant growth promotion effect of ethyl acetate and methanolic extracts of C. globosum on Brassica seedlings has also been reported [77].
The plant health promotion effect of C. globosum is attributed to the regulation and homeostasis of plant hormone and secondary metabolite biosynthesis, such as phenylpropanoid and chicoric acid [93,94,95,104]. This is supported by transcriptome analysis whereupon root colonization by C. globosum induced the expression of genes associated with the biosynthesis of phytohormones, photosynthesis, and secondary metabolite biosynthesis and metabolisms [93,94,95]. Chaetomium globosum is reported to produce phosphatases and phytases, mobilize phosphorus, and enhance the production of castor, wheat, and pearl millet [101].

5. Effect of C. globosum Application on Soil Health and Plant Microbiome

Beneficial microbes enhance soil health, as indicated by increased soil enzymatic activity, enhanced organic carbon transformation, and increased microbial diversity. Key soil health indicators include soil sucrase, catalase, urease, and acid phosphatase, as well as total nitrogen, accessible potassium, phosphorus, pH, and total potassium [105]. In addition to improving nutrient availability and acquisition and modulating growth and defence-related phytohormones, biocontrol fungi promote plant health by influencing the rhizosphere microbiome. This includes suppressing plant pathogens through various mechanisms and enhancing the relative abundance and diversity of indigenous soil growth-promoting microbial taxa. Such changes may be driven by microbial resource competition, antagonism due to antibiosis, interactions with plants that result ISR in plants [106]. For example, the application of biocontrol Trichoderma guizhouense to the rhizosphere of cabbage plant and T. harzianum to maize rhizosphere resulted in disease suppression and plant health promotion, which is attributed to the enrichment of soil-borne beneficial microbes [107,108].
Soil application of C. globosum resulted in a significant increase in soil fertility indices such as enzyme activities, phosphorus, potassium, and nitrogen content and pH in the cotton rhizosphere compared to the non-application control [108]. Similarly, C. globosum application increased soil enzyme activity and soil actinomycete bacteria [102]. Microbial community sequencing revealed that the abundance of soil-borne plant pathogenic fungi, including cotton wilt pathogens Fusarium spp. and V. dahliae, decreased in the cotton rhizosphere after C. globosum application. At the same time, the abundance of plant-beneficial bacteria, including Sphingomonas, Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Rhizobium, was increased. This shift in microbial community composition is plausibly attributed to the higher antibiosis activity of C. globosum towards fungi, consequently reducing competition for nutrients and space between fungi and bacteria and resulting in higher bacterial abundance [108]. Reports from Ma et al. suggest that soil application of C. globosum promotes soil health and microbiome functioning, which is one of the primary biocontrol mechanisms. More profound knowledge of the plant rhizosphere microbiome augmented with C. globosum will provide a better understanding of the interactions of C. globosum with the microbial community in a natural environment. This knowledge can offer unexplored opportunities to enhance biocontrol efficacy under field conditions and help to develop innovative biocontrol methods, such as selecting compatible microbial agents to develop consortia of BCAs.

6. Taxonomy of Chaetomium globosum

Gustav Kunze first described the genus Chaetomium in 1817, with C. globosum identified as the first species [109]. The fungus belongs to Phylum Ascomycota, Order Sordariales, Family Chaetomiaceae. Since first identification, many Chaetomium species have been identified based on morphological characteristics. The morphological traits used for classifying Chaetomium species include features of sexual structures, such as ascomata hairs, ascomata walls, and the morphology and arrangement of asci and ascospores. These include globose, ovate or obovate ostiolate ascomata covered with distinctive hairs; erect, flexuous, or coiled ascomatal hairs; an ascomatal wall with intricate texture; evanescent, clavate, or slightly fusiform asci; and limoniform or bilaterally flattened ascospores with an apical germ pore [110,111]. Ascospores’ characteristics include brown to grey-brown pigment, with one to two germ pores occasionally appearing as a black, dark, and tacky mass [110,111]. Based on these characteristics, the genus Chaetomium consists of over 400 proposed species epithets and approximately 270 accepted species [112]. While morphological characteristics have aided in the identification of several new species within this genus, many researchers consider the taxonomic classification based on these traits to be inconsistent and unreliable [70].
The absence of genomic information significantly hampers our understanding of this fungus’s genetic diversity and classification. Addressing this gap is essential for advancing our research and conservation efforts. However, studies in the last few decades that focus on multigene phylogenetic analysis combined with morphological traits have made significant progress in the species delimitation of C. globosum [70,110,111]. The loci used in these studies include ITS (internal transcribed spacers), LSU (D1/D2 domains of the 28S nrDNA), rpb1 and rpb2 (RNA polymerase II first and second largest subunit genes), tef1 (elongation factor 1-α), and tub2 (β-tubulin gene). The combination of morphological analysis and multigene phylogenetic studies has resulted in the identification of 43 species within the genus Chaetomium [70]. Among the genetic markers used, tub2 and rpb2 were the most effective at distinguishing between species in the Chaetomium complex [70,111]. To assess the genetic diversity of C. globosum, Darshan et al. [113] utilized RNA sequencing data and developed 22 expressed sequence tag–simple sequence repeat (EST-SSR) markers. These markers were used to analyze the genetic diversity among 15 C. globosum strains isolated from various ecological niches, including wheat leaves, grains, dung, and Dolichos seeds [113]. Additionally, other molecular markers such as Universal Rice Primer PCR (URP-PCR), Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs), and Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat [ISSR] markers have also been employed to evaluate the diversity of C. globosum [8].

7. Distribution of Chaetomium globosum

C. globosum is a widely distributed fungus in diverse environments from deserts to Arctic permafrost and is one of the predominant fungal taxa in soil fungal communities worldwide [114]. It thrives in nutrient-rich soil, organic compost, and decaying materials, acting as a saprotroph that breaks down complex organic matter [80]. Known for its strong cellulolytic activity, C. globosum decomposes cellulose effectively and is commonly found in decaying wood, leaf litter, and composting sites. Its decomposition promotes nutrient cycling, enhancing soil health and fertility [115,116]. In addition to its presence in natural environments, C. globosum has been discovered indoors. It flourishes under high-humidity conditions and can colonize various substrates, including wallpaper, textiles, and wooden structures, often leading to biodeterioration and structural damage. Moreover, this fungus poses a risk to food products, where it can cause spoilage and reduce quality [104]. Interestingly, strains of C. globosum have also been isolated from living animal hosts and the tissues of various plants, including gymnosperms, dicots, and monocots, indicating its endophytic lifestyle. This ability to inhabit diverse biological systems emphasizes its role as an ecological generalist. The adaptability of C. globosum to various ecological niches is likely attributed to its capacity to produce a wide range of secondary metabolites and enzymes, further enhancing its survival and ecological success.

8. Chaetomium globosum Cultivation and Formulation

In vitro culturing of microorganisms is vital in investigating their biology, mode of action, and environmental interactions. The knowledge generated from such studies helps to formulate strategies for their potential applications, including plant disease management. Chaetomium globosum exhibits various degrees of growth and sporulation on culture media commonly used in microbiological research under laboratory conditions. These media include potato dextrose agar, oatmeal agar, cornmeal agar, malt extract agar, Czapek-Dox agar, sabouraud agar, and Richard medium. C. globosum can grow on these media at 20–40 °C with an optimum growth rate of 25 °C to 35 °C [117,118,119,120]. Ease of in vitro culturing offers an excellent opportunity to understand C. globosum biology under various laboratory conditions where various growth parameters such as temperature, pH, and nutrient availability can be precisely managed for optimal functioning. For example, optimized production of cellulolytic enzymes and secondary metabolites and knowledge-based improvement of fungal traits contribute to biocontrol application and formulation for large-scale application under greenhouse and field conditions. In addition, adjusting growth conditions [e.g., different carbon and nitrogen sources, light conditions, temperature and pH] can lead to the identification of novel compounds that might not be produced under standard conditions. In addition, in vitro systems can facilitate genetic studies, including mutagenesis and genetic engineering, which can help to understand the underlying mechanisms of C. globosum as a biocontrol agent.
The formulation process involves several critical steps: selecting an appropriate type of formulation, mass production of the fungal spores, stabilization for prolonged shelf life, and choosing effective application methods [121]. Chaetomium globosum can be formulated for large-scale application under glasshouse and field conditions, leveraging its biocontrol properties against various plant pathogens. C. globosum can be prepared in different formulations, such as liquid, powder, and granular forms [122]. Liquid formulations of C. globosum involve suspending or emulsifying the fungal spores in a liquid carrier. These formulations are particularly advantageous for their ease of application and ability to provide uniform coverage on plant surfaces [123]. Additionally, the liquid medium can help to maintain the viability of the spores during storage and application [124]. Powder formulations consist of C. globosum spores mixed with inert carriers such as talc, clay, or other mineral powders. These carriers provide a stable environment for the spores, facilitating their storage and handling [125]. Powder formulations can be dusted directly onto plants or soil or reconstituted with water for spray applications. The stability and ease of storage of powder formulations make them suitable for immediate and long-term use [126].
Granular formulations incorporate C. globosum spores into granular carriers, which can be applied directly to the soil. This formulation is particularly effective for targeting soil-borne pathogens, as the granules can deliver the spores directly to the root zone of plants [127]. Granular formulations are applied using standard granular applicators and can be designed to release the spores gradually, ensuring prolonged protection against soil-borne diseases [121]. The talc-based formulation of C. globosum effectively inhibited various soil-borne pathogens, including Fusarium spp. and P. infestans [12,30,128]. Formulations based on C. globosum proved more effective than chemical treatments in managing soil-borne potato diseases [103,129].

9. Prospects

High efficacy and consistency are crucial for the successful integration of BCAs into crop production systems. One of the bottlenecks is the reduced efficacy of BCAs in the field compared to their higher efficacy in laboratory and controlled small-scale experiments. This is attributed to lack of deeper insights into the ecology and biology of BCAs, along with their interactions with natural microbes and plant hosts under field conditions. Recent advances in omics and molecular biology technology and microbiome studies have enabled researchers to overcome these challenges. Despite advances in Omics technologies, however, knowledge about C. globosum genomics and the underlying mechanisms of its interaction with the environment and fungal and plant hosts remains elusive. Addressing this knowledge gap can significantly contribute to better integration of C. globosum as a BCA in crop production systems. For instance, genomic information on C. globosum can aid in its identification, clarify its taxonomic position, and elucidate its relationships with other BCAs. Whole-genome sequencing can also facilitate the exploration of gene copy numbers and gene family evolution and help to identify key genes associated with biocontrol traits. This includes genes responsible for secondary metabolite production, host–microbe interactions, and signalling pathways that mediate growth, development, reproduction, and ecological niche adaptation. Furthermore, genomic data can provide opportunities to investigate genetic similarities and differences between C. globosum and other fungal BCAs, particularly in terms of their life strategies and modes of action as BCAs. Additionally, the availability of whole-genome sequenced data from a larger number of C. globosum strains can facilitate the development of DNA-based markers for strain identification [Figure 2].
Fungal BCAs exhibit significant intraspecific variations concerning their traits related to nematode antagonisms [130] and their compatibility with different host plants [131,132]. Thus, selecting a strain with greater biocontrol potential and compatibility with fungal and plant hosts is crucial to ensure effective biocontrol outcomes. To identify C. globosum strains with optimum biocontrol compatibility and consistent efficacy, a comprehensive screening process involving diverse C. globosum strains from various ecological environments can prove invaluable. By assessing their efficacy against a broad spectrum of plant pathogens while matching them with specific host plants, the most effective strains for biocontrol of a particular pathogen or enhancing the health of certain crops can be identified. Understanding the compatibility of BCAs, such as C. globosum, with plant pathogens and host plants presents an exciting opportunity to incorporate these findings into advanced plant breeding programs for optimized biocontrol potential. This integration would enable the strategic selection of plants that display desirable traits such as high yield and superior quality and exhibit enhanced disease resistance due to their compatibility with effective biocontrol agents.
Emerging evidence on the role of sRNAs-mediated RNA silencing in fungal interactions relevant to biocontrol opens new avenues for biocontrol research [50,51,52,53,54]. This includes the role of sRNAs as a master regulator of secondary metabolite production, which is a crucial trait of fungal BCAs. Since the antagonistic ability of C. globosum is mainly attributed to its ability to produce a range of secondary metabolites, identifying sRNA regulating secondary metabolite production in C. globosum may be useful for optimizing its secondary metabolite production and therefore its antagonistic potential. The genetic and genomic information of C. globosum coupled with knowledge of RNA silencing can be leveraged for its genetic improvement using genetic transformation systems, including CRISPR-Cas9 [Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats–CRISPR-Associated Protein 9] genome-editing technology.

Author Contributions

S.S., S.P., S.K. and M.D. wrote the manuscript draft. M.D. finalized the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding was enabled and organized by DST SERB grant no. ND06 for the post doc program. M.D. acknowledges the Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences, and Spatial Planning [FORMAS; grant number 2021–01461]. The APC was funded by FORMAS; grant number 2021–01461.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, J.; Qu, X.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Pan, H. Antifungal metabolites produced by Chaetomium globosum no.04, an endophytic fungus isolated from Ginkgo biloba. Indian J. Microbiol. 2013, 53, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aggarwal, R. Chaetomium globosum, a potential biocontrol agent and its mechanism of action. Indian Phytopathol. 2015, 68, 8–24. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dwibedi, V.; Rath, S.K.; Jain, S.; Martínez-Argueta, N.; Prakash, R.; Saxena, S.; Rios-Solis, L. Key insights into secondary metabolites from various Chaetomium species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 107, 1077–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rao, Q.R.; Rao, J.B.; Zhao, M. Chemical diversity and biological activities of specialized metabolites from the genus Chaetomium: 2013–2022. Phytochemistry 2023, 210, 113653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ashwini, C. A review on Chaetomium globosum as versatile weapons for various plant pathogens. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2019, 8, 946–949. [Google Scholar]
  6. Stenberg, J.A.; Sundh, I.; Becher, P.G.; Björkman, C.; Dubey, M.; Egan, P.A.; Friberg, H.; Gil, J.F.; Jensen, D.F.; Jonsson, M.; et al. When is it biological control? A framework of definitions, mechanisms, and classifications. J. Pest Sci. 2021, 94, 665–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aggarwal, R.; Tewari, A.K.; Srivastava, K.D.; Singh, D.V. Role of antibiosis in the biological control of spot blotch Cochliobolus sativus of wheat by Chaetomium globosum. Mycopathologia 2004, 157, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wiewióra, B.; Żurek, G. The Infection of Barley at Different Growth Stages by Bipolaris sorokiniana and Its Effect on Plant Yield and Sowing Value. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rajkumar, E.; Aggarwal, R.; Singh, B. Fungal antagonists for the biological control of Ascochyta blight of chickpea. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung 2005, 40, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hung, P.M.; Wattanachai, P.; Kasem, S.; Poeaim, S. Efficacy of Chaetomium species as biological control agents against Phytophthora nicotianae root rot in citrus. Mycobiology 2015, 43, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fayyadh, M.A.; Yousif, E.Q. Biological control of tomato leaf spot disease caused by Alternaria alternata using Chaetomium globosum and some other saprophytic fungi. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 388, 012017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shanthiyaa, V.; Saravanakumar, D.; Rajendran, L.; Karthikeyan, G.; Prabakar, K.; Raguchander, T. Use of Chaetomium globosum for biocontrol of potato late blight disease. Crop Prot. 2013, 52, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lewaa, L.; Zakaria, H. Chaetomium globosum, a potential biocontrol agent for root rot of date palm seedlings. Egypt J. Phytopathol. 2023, 512, 114–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Feng, C.; Xu, F.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, L.; Han, Z.; Shi, R.; Wan, X.; et al. Biological control of Fusarium crown rot of wheat with Chaetomium globosum 12XP1-2-3 and its effects on rhizosphere microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1133025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kommedahl, T.; Chang, I. Biological control of seedling blight of corn by coating kernels with antagonistic micro-organisms. Phytopathology 1968, 58, 1395–1401. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kommedahl, T.; Mew, I.C. Biocontrol of corn root infection in the field by seed treatment with antagonists. Phytopathology 1975, 65, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Andrews, J.H.; Berbee, F.M.; Nordheim, E.V. Microbial antagonism to the imperfect stage of the apple scab pathogen, Venturia inaequalis. Phytopathology 1983, 73, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cullen, D.; Andrews, J.H. Evidence for the role of antibiosis in the antagonism of Chaetomium globosum to the apple scab pathogen, Venturia inaequalis. Can. J. Bot. 1984, 62, 1819–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Davis, R.F.; Backman, P.A.; Rodriguez-Kabana, R.; Kokalis-Burelle, N. Biological control of apple fruit diseases by Chaetomium globosum formulations containing cellulose. Biol. Control 1992, 2, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vannacci, G.; Harman, G.E. Biocontrol of seed-borne Alternaria raphani and A. brassicicola. Can. J. Microbiol. 1987, 33, 850–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dhingra, O.; Mizubuti, E.; Santana, F. Chaetomium globosum for reducing primary inoculum of Diaporthe phaseolorum f. sp. meridionalis in soil-surface soybean stubble in field conditions. Biol. Control 2003, 26, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Soytong, K.; Kahonokmedhakul, S.; Song, J.; Tongon, R. Chaetomium Application in Agriculture. In Technology in Agriculture; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Noiaium, S.; Soytong, K. Integrated biological control of mango var. Choke Anan. ISHS Acta Hortic. 1999, 509, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Soytong, K. Evaluation of Chaetomium-biological fungicide to control Phytophthora stem and root rot of durian. Res. J. 2010, 3, 117–124. [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Thiep, N.; Soytong, K. Chaetomium spp. as biocontrol potential to control tea and coffee pathogens in Vietnam. J. Agric. Technol. 2015, 11, 1381–1392. [Google Scholar]
  26. Walther, D.; Gindrat, D. Biological control of damping-off of sugar-beet and cotton with Chaetomium globosum or a fluorescent Pseudomonas sp. J. Microbiol. 1988, 34, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Di Pietro, A.; Gut-Rella, M.; Pachlatko, J.P.; Schwinn, F.J. Role of antibiotics produced by Chaetomium globosum in biocontrol of Pythium ultimum, a causal agent of damping-off. Phytopathology 1992, 82, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khali, S.A.M.; El-Moug, N.S.; El-Gamal, N.G.; Abdel-Kader, M.M. Field approaches of chemical inducers and bioagents for controlling root diseases incidence of pea [Pisum sativum L.] under field conditions. Plant Pathol. J. 2020, 193, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Madbouly, A.K.; Abdel-Aziz, M.S.; Abdel-Wahhab, M.A. Biosynthesis of nanosilver using Chaetomium globosum and its application to control Fusarium wilt of tomato in the greenhouse. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2017, 11, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Phong, N.H.; Wattanachai, P.; Kasem, S.; Luu, N.T. Antimicrobial substances from Chaetomium spp. against Pestalotia spp. causing grey blight disease of tea. Int. J. Agric. Technol. 2014, 10, 863–874. [Google Scholar]
  31. Vilavong, S.; Soytong, K. Biological control of coffee leaf anthracnose by Chaetomium spp. Int. J. Agric. Technol. 2017, 13, 1785–1794. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tathan, S. Biological control of rice leaf spot disease caused by Curvularia lunata using Chaetomium globosum. J. Agric. Technol. 2012, 8, 2101–2108. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mouden, N.; Soytong, K.; Poeaim, S. Biological control of strawberry leather rot caused by Phytophthora cactorum using Chaetomium globosum. J. Agric. Technol. 2016, 12, 1785–1794. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kasem, S.; Quimio, T.H. Antagonism of Chaetomium globosum to the rice blast pathogen, Pyricularia oryzae. Agric. Nat. Resour. 1989, 23, 198–203. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hubbard, J.P.; Harman, G.E.; Eckenrode, C.J. Interaction of a biological control agent, Chaetomium globosum with seed coat microflora. Can. J. Microbiol. 1985, 28, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tveit, M.; Wood, R.K. The control of Fusarium blight in oat seedlings with antagonistic species of Chaetomium. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1955, 43, 538–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sultana, J.N.; Pervez, Z.; Rahman, H.; Islam, M.S. In-vitro evaluation of different strains of Trichoderma harzianum and Chaetomium globosum as biological control agents for seedling mortality of chilli. Bangladesh Res. Publ. J. 2012, 63, 305–310. [Google Scholar]
  38. La, N.H.; Van Thiep, N.; Soytong, K. Research to produce biological products of Chaetomium to control fungal diseases on tea, coffee and rubber. Int. J. Agric. Technol. 2016, 12, 993–1004. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Ye, Y.; Tang, C. Antifungal activity of chaetoviridin A from Chaetomium globosum CEF-082 metabolites against Verticillium dahliae in cotton. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2021, 34, 758–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ali, M. Role of Purpureocillium lilacinum cultural filtrate in controlling onion white rot. J. Plant Prot. Pathol. 2020, 113, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kean, S.; Soytong, K.; To-Anun, C. Application of biological fungicides to control citrus root rot under field condition in Cambodia. J. Agric. Technol. 2010, 6, 219–230. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bairwa, A.; Dipta, B.; Mhatre, P.H.; Venkatasalam, E.P.; Sharma, S.; Tiwari, R.; Sharma, A.K. Chaetomium globosum KPC3: An antagonistic fungus against the potato cyst nematode, Globodera rostochiensis. Curr. Microbiol. 2023, 80, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yan, X.N.; Sikora, R.A.; Zheng, J.W. Potential use of cucumber Cucumis sativus L. endophytic fungi as seed treatment agents against root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2011, 12, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhou, W.; Starr, J.L.; Krumm, J.L.; Sword, G.A. The fungal endophyte Chaetomium globosum negatively affects both above- and belowground herbivores in cotton. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhou, W.; Verma, V.C.; Wheeler, T.A.; Woodward, J.E.; Starr, J.L.; Sword, G.A. Tapping into the cotton fungal phytobiome for novel nematode biological control tools. Phytobiomes J. 2020, 4, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jothini Varsha, S.I.; Rajendran, L.; Saravanakumari, K.; Karthikeyan, G.; Vinothkumar, B.; Anandham, R. Exploitation of Chaetomium globosum and AMF against Macrophomina phaseolina causing root and crown rot in strawberry and its underlying mechanisms by molecular docking. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2025, 138, 102697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Köhl, J.; Kolnaar, R.; Ravensberg, W.J. Mode of action of microbial biological control agents against plant diseases, relevance beyond efficacy. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Druzhinina, I.S.; Seidl-Seiboth, V.; Herrera-Estrella, A.; Horwitz, B.A.; Kenerley, C.M.; Monte, E.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Zeilinger, S.; Grigoriev, I.V.; Kubicek, C.P. Trichoderma: The genomics of opportunistic success. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 16, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Funck Jensen, D.; Dubey, M.; Jensen, B.; Karlsson, M. Clonostachys rosea for the control of plant diseases. In Microbial Bioprotectants for Plant Disease Management; Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W., Eds.; BDS Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 429–471. [Google Scholar]
  50. Piombo, E.; Vetukuri, R.R.; Konakalla, N.C.; Kalyandurg, P.B.; Sundararajan, P.; Jensen, D.F.; Karlsson, M.; Dubey, M. RNA silencing is a key regulatory mechanism in the biocontrol fungus Clonostachys rosea-wheat interactions. BMC Biol. 2024, 22, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Piombo, E.; Vetukuri, R.R.; Tzelepis, G.; Jensen, D.F.; Karlsson, M.; Dubey, M. Small RNAs, a new paradigm in fungal-fungal interactions used for biocontrol. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2024, 48, 100356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Piombo, E.; Kelbessa, B.G.; Sundararajan, P.; Whisson, S.; Vetukuri, R.R.; Dubey, M. RNA silencing proteins and small RNAs in oomycete plant pathogens and biocontrol agents. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Piombo, E.; Vetukuri, R.R.; Broberg, A.; Kalyandurg, P.B.; Kushwaha, S.; Funck Jensen, D.; Karlsson, M.; Dubey, M. Role of Dicer-dependent RNA interference in regulating mycoparasitic interactions. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e01099-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Piombo, E.; Vetukuri, R.R.; Sundararajan, P.; Kushwaha, S.; Funck Jensen, D.; Karlsson, M.; Dubey, M. Comparative small RNA and degradome sequencing provides insights into antagonistic interactions in the biocontrol fungus Clonostachys rosea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 88, e00643-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Soytong, K. Production of mycofungicidal pellets from Chaetomium globosum. Thai Agric. Res. J. 1991, 93, 193–196. [Google Scholar]
  56. Biswas, S.K.; Srivastava, K.D.; Aggarwal, R.; Dureja, P.; Singh, D.V. Antagonism of Chaetomium globosum to Drechslera sorokiniana, the spot blotch pathogen of wheat. Indian Phytopathol. 2000, 53, 436–440. [Google Scholar]
  57. Elshahawy, I.E.; Khattab, A.E.-N.A. Endophyte Chaetomium globosum improves the growth of maize plants and induces their resistance to late wilt disease. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2022, 129, 1125–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Istifadah, N.; McGee, P.A. Endophytic Chaetomium globosum reduces development of tan spot in wheat caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2006, 35, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Heller, W.E.; Theiler-Hedtrich, R. Antagonism of Chaetomium globosum, Gliocladium virens, and Trichoderma viride to four soil-borne Phytophthora species. J. Phytopathol. 1994, 141, 390–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kumari, S.; Verma, R.; Chauhan, A.; Raja, V.; Kumari, S.; Kulshrestha, S. Biogenic approach for synthesis of nanoparticles via plants for biomedical applications: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fierro-Cruz, J.E.; Jiménez, P.; Coy-Barrera, E. Fungal endophytes isolated from Protium heptaphyllum and Trattinnickia rhoifolia as antagonists of Fusarium oxysporum. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2017, 49, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sangeetha, C.; Kiran Kumar, N.; Krishnamoorthy, A.S.; Harish, S. Biomolecules from Chaetomium globosum possessing antimicrobial compounds potentially inhibits Fusarium wilt of tomato. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2024, 1964, 2196–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liang, X.; Lin, Y.; Yu, W.; Yang, M.; Meng, X.; Yang, W.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, R.; Sun, G. Chaetoglobosin A contributes to the antagonistic action of Chaetomium globosum strain 61239 toward the apple valsa canker pathogen Cytospora mali. Phytopathology 2023, 3, PHYTO01230036R. [Google Scholar]
  64. Rajendran, L.; Durgadevi, D.; Kavitha, R.; Divya, S.; Ganeshan, K.; Vetrivelkalai, P.M.; Karthikeyan, G.; Raguchander, T. Characterization of chaetoglobosin producing Chaetomium globosum for the management of Fusarium–Meloidogyne wilt complex in tomato. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 134, lxac074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Schümann, J.; Hertweck, C. Molecular basis of cytochalasan biosynthesis in fungi, gene cluster analysis and evidence for the involvement of a PKS-NRPS hybrid synthase by RNA silencing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9564–9565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yan, W.; Cao, L.L.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhao, R.; Zhao, S.S.; Khan, B.; Ye, Y.H. New metabolites from endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum CDW7. Molecules 2018, 23, 2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Cheng, M.; Zhao, S.; Lin, C.; Song, J.; Yang, Q. Requirement of LaeA for sporulation, pigmentation and secondary metabolism in Chaetomium globosum. Fungal Biol. 2021, 125, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, Z.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, K.; Lin, C.; Ru, X.; Yang, Q. CgVeA, a light signaling responsive regulator, is involved in regulation of chaetoglobosin A biosynthesis and conidia development in Chaetomium globosum. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2022, 16, 1084–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yan, Y.; Xiang, B.; Xie, Q.; Lin, Y.; Shen, G.; Hao, X.; Zhu, X. A putative C2H2 transcription factor Cgtf6, controlled by Cgtf1, negatively regulates chaetoglobosin A biosynthesis in Chaetomium globosum. Front. Fungal Biol. 2021, 15, 756104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, X.; Lombard, L.; Groenewald, J.; Li, J.; Videira, S.; Samson, R.; Liu, X.; Crous, P. Phylogenetic reassessment of the Chaetomium globosum species complex. Persoonia 2015, 36, 83–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Youn, U.J.; Sripisut, T.; Park, E.J.; Kondratyuk, T.P.; Fatima, N.; Simmons, C.J.; Wall, M.M.; Sun, D.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Chang, L.C. Determination of the absolute configuration of chaetoviridins and other bioactive azaphilones from the endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 4719–4723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Omar, A.M.; Mohamed, G.A.; Ibrahim, S.R. Chaetomugilins and chaetoviridins—Promising natural metabolites, structures, separation, characterization, biosynthesis, bioactivities, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Awad, N.E.; Kassem, H.A.; Hamed, M.A.; El-Naggar, M.A.; El-Feky, A.M. Bioassays guided isolation of compounds from Chaetomium globosum. J. Mycol. Med. 2014, 24, e35–e42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Park, J.H.; Choi, G.J.; Jang, K.S.; Lim, H.K.; Kim, H.T.; Cho, K.Y.; Kim, J.C. Antifungal activity against plant pathogenic fungi of chaetoviridins isolated from Chaetomium globosum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 252, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Winter, J.M.; Sato, M.; Sugimoto, S.; Chiou, G.; Garg, N.K.; Tang, Y.; Watanabe, K. Identification and characterization of the chaetoviridin and chaetomugilin gene cluster in Chaetomium globosum reveal dual functions of an iterative highly-reducing polyketide synthase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17900–17903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kumar, R.; Kundu, A.; Dutta, A.; Supradip, S.; Das, A. Profiling of volatile secondary metabolites of Chaetomium globosum for potential antifungal activity against soil borne fungi. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2020, 9, 922–927. [Google Scholar]
  77. Kumar, R.; Kundu, A.; Dutta, A.; Saha, S.; Das, A.; Bhowmik, A. Chemo-profiling of bioactive metabolites from Chaetomium globosum for biocontrol of Sclerotinia rot and plant growth promotion. Fungal Biol. 2021, 125, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Qureshi, S.A.; Ruqqia, A.; Sultana, V.; Ara, J.; Ehteshamul-Haque, S. Nematocidal potential of culture filtrates of soil fungi associated with rhizosphere and rhizoplane of cultivated and wild plants. Pak. J. Bot. 2012, 44, 1041–1046. [Google Scholar]
  79. Hu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, P.; Ruan, W.; Zhu, X. Nematicidal activity of chaetoglobosin A produced by Chaetomium globosum NK102 against Meloidogyne incognita. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Khan, B.; Yan, W.; Wei, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, S.; Cao, L.; Rajput, N.A.; Ye, Y. Nematicidal metabolites from endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum YSC5. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2019, 366, 36614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, Z.; Xue, R.; Cui, J.; Wang, J.; Fan, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhan, X. Antibacterial activity of a polysaccharide produced from Chaetomium globosum CGMCC 6882. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 125, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Li, W.; Li, R.; Wang, X.; Qiao, H.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, H. Antibacterial mechanism of the polysaccharide produced by Chaetomium globosum CGMCC 6882 against Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 159, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Moya, P.; Pedemonte, D.; Amengual, S.; Franco, M.E.; Sisterna, M.N. Antagonism and modes of action of Chaetomium globosum species group, potential biocontrol agent of barley foliar diseases. Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 2016, 51, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Darshan, K.; Aggarwal, R.; Bashyal, B.M.; Singh, J.; Shanmugam, V.; Gurjar, M.S.; Solanke, A.U. Transcriptome profiling provides insights into potential antagonistic mechanisms involved in Chaetomium globosum against Bipolaris sorokiniana. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 578115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Choudhary, D.K.; Johri, B.N. Interaction of Bacillus spp. and plants—With special reference to induced systemic resistance. Microbiol. Res. 2009, 164, 493–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cuomo, C.A.; Untereiner, W.A.; Ma, L.J.; Grabherr, M.; Birren, B.W. Draft genome sequence of the cellulolytic fungus Chaetomium globosum. Genome Announc. 2015, 3, e00021-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Keller, N.P. Translating biosynthetic gene clusters into fungal armor and weaponry. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015, 11, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Dubey, M.K.; Jensen, D.F.; Karlsson, M. An ATP-binding cassette pleiotropic drug-transporter protein is required for xenobiotic tolerance and antagonism in the fungal biocontrol agent Clonostachys rosea. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Broberg, M.; Dubey, M.; Iqbal, M.; Gudmundsson, M.; Ihrmark, K.; Schroers, H.-J.; Funck Jensen, D.; Durling, M.B.; Karlsson, M. Comparative genomics highlights the importance of drug efflux transporters during evolution of mycoparasitism in Clonostachys subgenus Bionectria [Fungi, Ascomycota, Hypocreales]. Evol. Appl. 2020, 13, 476–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zamioudis, C.; Pieterse, C.M. Modulation of host immunity by beneficial microbes. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sharma, S.; Singh, S.; Dhanjal, D.S.; Kumar, A.; Jan, S.; Ramamurthy, P.C.; Singh, J. Role of rhizobacteria from plant growth promoter to bioremediator. In Phytoremediation Technology for the Removal of Heavy Metals and Other Contaminants from Soil and Water; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 309–328. [Google Scholar]
  92. Yuan, M.; Huang, Y.; Ge, W.; Jia, Z.; Song, S.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Y. Involvement of jasmonic acid, ethylene and salicylic acid signaling pathways behind the systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum H9 in cucumber. BMC Genom. 2019, 18, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, Y.; Yang, N.; Zhao, L.; Zhu, H.; Tang, C. Transcriptome analysis reveals the defense mechanism of cotton against Verticillium dahliae in the presence of the biocontrol fungus Chaetomium globosum CEF-082. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Singh, J.; Aggarwal, R.; Bashyal, B.M.; Darshan, K.; Parmar, P.; Saharan, M.S.; Husain, Z.; Solanke, A.U. Transcriptome reprogramming of tomato orchestrates the hormone-signaling network of systemic resistance induced by Chaetomium globosum. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 721193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Tian, Y.; Fu, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, R.; Kang, Z.; Gao, K.; Mendgen, K. Mechanisms in growth promotion of cucumber by the endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum strain ND35. J. Fungi 2022, 11, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Biswas, S.K.; Aggarwal, R.; Srivastava, K.D.; Gupta, S.; Dureja, P. Characterization of antifungal metabolites of Chaetomium globosum Kunze and their antagonism against fungal plant pathogens. J. Biol. Control 2012, 26, 70–74. [Google Scholar]
  97. Bu, B.W.; Qiu, D.W.; Zeng, H.M.; Guo, L.H.; Yuan, J.J.; Yang, X.F. A fungal protein elicitor PevD1 induces Verticillium wilt resistance in cotton. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cecilia, B.; Alessio, F.; Federico, S.; Antonella, G.; Massimiliano, T. Modulation of phytohormone signaling: A primary function of flavonoids in plant–environment interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1042. [Google Scholar]
  99. Meng, J.; Gao, H.; Zhai, W.B.; Shi, J.Y.; Zhang, M.Z.; Zhang, W.W.; Jian, G.L.; Zhang, M.P.; Qi, F.J. Subtle regulation of cotton resistance to Verticillium wilt mediated by MAPKK family members. Plant Sci. 2018, 272, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhai, X.; Luo, D.; Li, X.; Han, T.; Jia, M.; Kong, Z.; Ji, J.; Rahman, K.; Qin, L.; Zheng, C. Endophyte Chaetomium globosum D38 promotes bioactive constituents accumulation and root production in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 302133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vaghasia, P.M.; Davariya, R.L.; Daki, R.N. Effect of Bio-Phos Chaetomium globosum on castor Ricinus communis L. yield at different levels of phosphorus under irrigated conditions. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 1974–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Fu-hai, S.; Wang, S.; Zhang, X.F.; Gao, K.X.; Yin, C.L.; Chen, X.S.; Mao, Z.Q. Effects of Chaetomium globosum ND35 fungal fertilizer on continuous cropping soil microorganism and Malus hupehensis seedling biomass. Acta Hort. Sin. 2015, 42, 205. [Google Scholar]
  103. Parthasarathy, S.; Harish, S.; Rajendran, L.; Raguchander, T. Evaluating an isotonic aqueous formulation of Chaetomium globosum Kunze for the management of potato black scurf disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn in India. J. Plant Pathol. 2022, 104, 191–202. [Google Scholar]
  104. Spinelli, V.; Brasili, E.; Sciubba, F.; Ceci, A.; Giampaoli, O.; Miccheli, A.; Pasqua, G.; Persiani, A.M. Biostimulant effects of Chaetomium globosum and Minimedusa polyspora culture filtrates on Cichorium intybus plant: Growth performance and metabolomic traits. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 879076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Allen, D.E.; Singh, B.P.; Dalal, R.C. Soil health indicators under climate change: A review of current knowledge. In Soil Health and Climate Change; Singh, B.P., Cowie, A., Chan, K.Y., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2011; pp. 25–45. [Google Scholar]
  106. Hassani, M.A.; Durán, P.; Hacquard, S. Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont. Microbiome 2018, 6, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Saravanakumar, K.; Li, Y.; Yu, C.; Wang, Q.Q.; Wang, M.; Sun, J.; Gao, J.; Chen, J. Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on maize rhizosphere microbiome and biocontrol of Fusarium stalk rot. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Wei, F.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, J.; Qi, G.; Ma, Z.; Zhu, H.; Feng, H.; et al. Applications of Chaetomium globosum CEF-082 improve soil health and mitigate the continuous cropping obstacles for Gossypium hirsutum. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 197, 116586. [Google Scholar]
  109. Kunze, G.; Schmidt, J.K. Chaetomium globosum Kunze. In Mykologische Hefte (Leipzig); Kunze & Schmidt: Leipzig, Germany, 1817; Available online: https://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/namesrecord.asp?RecordId=172545 (accessed on 24 June 2025).
  110. Asgari, B.; Zare, R. The genus Chaetomium in Iran: A phylogenetic study including six new species. Mycologia 2011, 103, 863–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wang, X.W.; Houbraken, J.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Meijer, M.; Andersen, B.; Nielsen, K.F.; Samson, R.A. Diversity and taxonomy of Chaetomium and Chaetomium-like fungi from indoor environments. Stud. Mycol. 2016, 84, 145–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Abdel-Azeem, A.M. Taxonomy and biodiversity of the genus Chaetomium in different habitats. In Recent Developments on Genus Chaetomium; Abdel-Azeem, A.M., Ed.; Fungal Biology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  113. Darshan, K.; Aggarwal, R.; Bashyal, B.M.; Singh, J.; Saharan, M.S.; Gurjar, M.S.; Solanke, A.U. Characterization and development of transcriptome-derived novel EST-SSR markers to assess genetic diversity in Chaetomium globosum. 3 Biotech 2023, 13, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Egidi, E.; Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Plett, J.M.; Wang, J.; Eldridge, D.J.; Bardgett, R.D.; Maestre, F.T.; Singh, B.K. A few Ascomycota taxa dominate soil fungal communities worldwide. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Dissanayake, R.K.; Ratnaweera, P.B.; Williams, D.E.; Wijayarathne, C.D.; Wijesundera, R.L.C.; Andersen, R.J.; de Silva, E.D. Antimicrobial activities of endophytic fungi of the Sri Lankan aquatic plant Nymphaea nouchali and chaetoglobosin A and C produced by the endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum. Mycology 2016, 7, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sahu, S.; Prakash, A. Chaetomium globosum, a potential fungus for plant and human health. KAVAKA 2018, 50, 53–63. [Google Scholar]
  117. Peng, L.; Ning, T.; Lu, W.; Chen, P.; Li, H.; Yi, Y.; Wang, Z.; Hu, Y. Consolidated bioprocess of corn stover to polysaccharide using Chaetomium globosum CGMCC 6882. GOST 2019, 21, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sarmales-Murga, C.; Akaoka, F.; Sato, M.; Takanishi, J.; Mino, T.; Miyoshi, N.; Watanabe, K. A new class of dimeric product isolated from the fungus Chaetomium globosum, evaluation of chemical structure and biological activity. J. Antibiot. 2020, 735, 320–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kiran, R.; Akhtar, J.; Kumar, P.; Shekhar, M. Anthracnose of chilli: Status, diagnosis, and management. In Capsicum; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  120. Wang, W.; Yang, J.; Liao, Y.Y.; Cheng, G.; Chen, J.; Cheng, X.D.; Qin, J.J.; Shao, Z. Cytotoxic nitrogenated azaphilones from the deep-sea-derived fungus Chaetomium globosum MP4-S01-7. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 1157–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Junaid, J.M.; Dar, N.A.; Bhat, T.A.; Bhat, A.H.; Bhat, M.A. Commercial biocontrol agents and their mechanism of action in the management of plant pathogens. Int. J. Mod. Plant Anim. Sci. 2013, 1, 39–57. [Google Scholar]
  122. Seethapathy, P.; Sankarasubramanian, H.; Lingan, R.; Thiruvengadam, R. Chaetomium sp., an insight into its antagonistic mechanism, mass multiplication, and production cost analysis. In Agricultural Microbiology Based Entrepreneurship; Amaresan, N., Dharumadurai, D., Babalola, O.O., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2023; Volume 39. [Google Scholar]
  123. Dhingra, O.; Sinclair, J.B. Basic Plant Pathology Methods; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  124. Harman, G.E.; Howell, C.R.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma species—Opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 2, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Lahlali, R.; Ezrari, S.; Radouane, N.; Kenfaoui, J.; Esmaeel, Q.; El Hamss, H.; Belabess, Z.; Barka, E.A. Biological control of plant pathogens: A global perspective. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Cook, R.J.; Baker, K.F. The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of Plant Pathogens; American Phytopathological Society: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  127. Fravel, D.R.; Connick, W.J., Jr.; Lewis, J.A. Formulation of microorganisms to control plant diseases. In Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals; Bailey, J.E., Ollis, D.F., Eds.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  128. Pothiraj, G.; Hussain, Z.; Singh, A.K.; Solanke, A.U.; Aggarwal, R.; Ramesh, R.; Shanmugam, V. Characterisation of Fusarium spp. inciting vascular wilt of tomato and its management using a Chaetomium-based biocontrol consortium. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 748013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zhao, S.S.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Yan, W.; Cao, L.L.; Xiao, Y.; Ye, Y.H. Chaetomium globosum CDW7, a potential biological control strain and its antifungal metabolites. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364, fiw264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Iqbal, M.; Broberg, M.; Haarith, D.; Broberg, A.; Bushley, K.E.; Durling, M.B.; Viketoft, M.; Funck Jensen, D.; Dubey, M.; Karlsson, M. Natural variation of root lesion nematode antagonism in the biocontrol fungus Clonostachys rosea and identification of biocontrol factors through genome-wide association mapping. Evol. Appl. 2020, 13, 2264–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Chaudhary, S.; Ricardo, R.M.N.; Dubey, M.; Jensen, D.F.; Grenville-Briggs, L.; Karlsson, M. Genotypic variation in winter wheat for Fusarium foot rot and its biocontrol using Clonostachys rosea. G3 2024, 7, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Chaudhary, S.; Zakieh, M.; Dubey, M.; Jensen, D.F.; Grenville-Briggs, L.; Chawade, A.; Karlsson, M. Plant genotype-specific modulation of Clonostachys rosea-mediated biocontrol of Septoria tritici blotch disease on wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 25, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The primary mode of action of Chaetomium globosum as a plant growth promoter and biocontrol agent. (1) Chaetomium globosum is a key decomposer of soil organic matter that enhances soil fertility by increasing organic carbon, phosphorus, potassium, nitrogen, and pH levels in the rhizosphere. (2) Antibiosis through interference competition by producing secondary metabolites and enzymes. (3) Direct parasitism of fungal prey through secretion of hydrolytic enzymes, toxins, and other secondary metabolites. (4) Induction of systemic defense response and plant growth promotion by manipulating the host plant’s hormone biosynthesis. (5) Chaetomium globosum promotes beneficial microbes and their functioning in the rhizosphere and thereby enhances plant health.
Figure 1. The primary mode of action of Chaetomium globosum as a plant growth promoter and biocontrol agent. (1) Chaetomium globosum is a key decomposer of soil organic matter that enhances soil fertility by increasing organic carbon, phosphorus, potassium, nitrogen, and pH levels in the rhizosphere. (2) Antibiosis through interference competition by producing secondary metabolites and enzymes. (3) Direct parasitism of fungal prey through secretion of hydrolytic enzymes, toxins, and other secondary metabolites. (4) Induction of systemic defense response and plant growth promotion by manipulating the host plant’s hormone biosynthesis. (5) Chaetomium globosum promotes beneficial microbes and their functioning in the rhizosphere and thereby enhances plant health.
Microorganisms 13 01646 g001
Figure 2. Summary highlighting the existing knowledge gaps and the integration of omics technology to explore the biocontrol mechanisms of C. globosum for a well-informed approach to enhancing its biocontrol efficacy.
Figure 2. Summary highlighting the existing knowledge gaps and the integration of omics technology to explore the biocontrol mechanisms of C. globosum for a well-informed approach to enhancing its biocontrol efficacy.
Microorganisms 13 01646 g002
Table 1. A list of plant diseases reported to be managed by Chaetomium globosum in greenhouse and field conditions.
Table 1. A list of plant diseases reported to be managed by Chaetomium globosum in greenhouse and field conditions.
DiseasePlantPathogenReferences
AnthracnoseBlack pepperPhytophthora palmivora,Soytong et al., 2021 [22]
AnthracnoseMangoColletotrichum gloeosporioidesNoiaium, 1999 [23]
Ascochyta blight ChickpeaAscochyta rabieiRajkumar et al., 2005 [9]
Apple scabApple Venturia inaequalisAndrews et al., 1983
Cullen and Andrews, 1984 [17,18]
Sooty blotch ApplePhyllachora pomigenaDavis et al., 1992 [19]
Spot blotchBarleyBipolaris sorokinianaAggarwal et al., 2004 [7]
Spot blotchWheatBipolaris sorokinianaAggarwal et al., 2004 [7]
Basal rotCornSclerotium rolfsiiSoytong, 2010 [24]
Citrus leaf minerTangerinePhytophthora parasiticaSoytong et al., 2021 [22]
Coffee WiltCoffeeFusarium roseumVan and Soytong, 2015 [25]
Damping offSugarbeetPythiumultimumWalther and Gindrat, 1988 [26]
Damping offCottonPythium ultimumDi Pietro et al., 1992 [27]
Damping offPeasPythiumKhali et al., 2020 [28]
Damping offRadishesRhizoctonia solaniAggarwal et al., 2004 [7]
WiltTomatoFusarium oxysporumMadbouly et al., 2017 [29]
Grape white rotGrapeConiothyriumdiplodiellaZhang et al., 2013 [1]
Grey blightCoffeePestalotia spp.Phong et al., 2014 [30]
Late blightPotatoPhytophthora InfestansShanthiyaa et al., 2013 [12]
Leaf anthracnoseCoffeeColletotrichum gloeosporioidesVilavong and Soytong, 2017 [31]
Leaf spotRiceCurvularialunataTathan, 2012 [32]
Leather rotStrawberryPhytophthora cactorumMouden et al., 2016 [33]
Peach rotPeachRhizopus stoloniferZhang et al., 2013 [1]
Rice blastRicePyricularia oryzaeKasem and Quimio, 1989 [34]
Root rotPomelo Phytophthora palmivoraHung et al., 2015 [10]
Seed rotRadishAlternaria raphaniVannucci and Harman, 1987 [20]
Seed-corn maggotSquashFusarium solaniHubbard et al., 1982 [35]
Seedling blightOatFusarium spp.Tveit and Wood, 1955 [36]
Seedling mortalityChiliSclerotium rolfsii
Colletotrichum capsici
Sultana et al., 2012 [37]
Stem cankerSoybeanDiaporthephaseolorum var. meridionalisDhingra and Santana, 2003 [21]
Spot blotchWheatDrechslerasorokinianaAggarwal et al., 2004 [7]
Tea wiltTeaFusarium roseumLa et al., 2016 [38]
WiltCottonVerticillium dahliaeZhang et al., 2021 [39]
White rotOnionSclerotium cepivorum,Ali, 2020 [40]
Root rotCitrusPhytophthora nicotianae
Pythium ultimum
Hung et al., 2015
Kean et al., 2010 [10,41]
Leaf spotTomatoAlternaria alternataFayyadh and Yousif, 2019 [11]
Root rotDate palmRhizoctonia solani,
Fusarium oxysporum,
Fusarium chlamydosporum
Lewaa and Zakaria, 2023 [13]
Root rotCornFusarium roseumKommedahl and Chang, 1968.
Kommedahl and Mew, 1975 [15,16]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharma, S.; Pandey, S.; Kulshreshtha, S.; Dubey, M. Biology and Application of Chaetomium globosum as a Biocontrol Agent: Current Status and Future Prospects. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071646

AMA Style

Sharma S, Pandey S, Kulshreshtha S, Dubey M. Biology and Application of Chaetomium globosum as a Biocontrol Agent: Current Status and Future Prospects. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(7):1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071646

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharma, Shailja, Saurabh Pandey, Sourabh Kulshreshtha, and Mukesh Dubey. 2025. "Biology and Application of Chaetomium globosum as a Biocontrol Agent: Current Status and Future Prospects" Microorganisms 13, no. 7: 1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071646

APA Style

Sharma, S., Pandey, S., Kulshreshtha, S., & Dubey, M. (2025). Biology and Application of Chaetomium globosum as a Biocontrol Agent: Current Status and Future Prospects. Microorganisms, 13(7), 1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071646

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop