Next Article in Journal
Fusobacterium nucleatum Is Associated with Tumor Characteristics, Immune Microenvironment, and Survival in Appendiceal Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure and Charlson Comorbidity Index in Predicting the Death of Spanish Inpatients with Diabetes and Invasive Pneumococcal Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Postbiotics from Functional Foods for Managing Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms, Sources, Therapeutic Potential, and Clinical Perspectives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Encapsulation of Fresh Spirulina Biomass in Alginate Spheres for Yogurt Fortification

by
Domenico Siclari
,
Maria Rosaria Panuccio
and
Rossana Sidari
*
Department of Agraria, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(7), 1641; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071641
Submission received: 18 June 2025 / Revised: 8 July 2025 / Accepted: 9 July 2025 / Published: 11 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microorganisms in Functional Foods: 2nd Edition)

Abstract

A new spherification of Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) was developed for its use as a food supplement. The novelty of this study is the incorporation of fresh Spirulina biomass into alginate spheres formulated with 3% sodium alginate and 1.5% calcium lactate and its addition into yogurt. The spheres and the fortified yogurt were stored at 4 °C for 15 days. The viability of Spirulina, either in contact with the yogurt or not, was evaluated both by OD550nm measurements and microscopic observations. Furthermore, the effect of Spirulina spheres on Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus was evaluated by enumerating them in standard media. Spirulina retained its viability for up to 15 days when stored separately from the yogurt matrix. Spirulina had a stimulating effect on the lactic acid bacteria: after 15 days, L. bulgaricus and S. thermophilus showed a load increase of 2.66% and 1.64%, respectively, compared to the load detected in the unfortified yogurt. Our study has demonstrated the technical feasibility of producing fresh Spirulina spheres, which can be used alone or added to food preparation. Nevertheless, additional investigations—including quantitative assessment of bioactive compounds and comprehensive sensory analysis—are essential to validate the methodology and support its scalability.

1. Introduction

The cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis, Spirulina, is defined as a superfood thanks to its high content in proteins, carbohydrates, fats including polyunsaturated ω3 and ω6 fatty acids, vitamins, pigments, and phenolic compounds. Moreover, Spirulina has beneficial health effects by protecting against oxidation and aging, cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, renal failure, cancer, and male infertility [1,2].
Most of the Spirulina biomass produced today is sold as a food supplement in the form of dried powder, flakes or capsules. Consumers are becoming increasingly health-conscious and are seeking functional products that offer nutritional benefits beyond basic sustenance. Therefore, the production of functional foods/beverages with the addition of this microalga such as yogurt and cheese, baked goods, pasta, snacks, and ice cream is increasing, as is the use of Spirulina in cooking as an ingredient for various sweet and savory preparations [3].
This study introduces a simple and cost-effective spherification method designed to preserve the viability of fresh Spirulina for potential use in functional foods, particularly yogurt. Therefore, the external gelation, or direct spherification method, was selected in preference to other encapsulation techniques, which may potentially preserve the properties of the fresh Spirulina unaltered. This selection avoided extreme factors, such as high temperature, which would impair the composition or viability of the fresh material. Furthermore, this choice was justified by the simplicity, speed, and low cost of the technique.
A very recent study reports on the fortification of wheat noodles with fresh Spirulina microcapsules [4]. To the best of our knowledge, to date no studies have combined the encapsulation of viable Spirulina biomass with the fortification of yogurt.
In this work, we have used live Spirulina; therefore, it fills the gap existing in the literature that broadly reports the fortification of dairy products with dead Spirulina biomass usually added freely to the products. As regards Spirulina-fortified novel dairy products that contain both the bioactive microalga compounds and beneficial lactic acid bacteria (LAB), Spirulina is generally used as a dehydrated, freeze-dried and spray-dried biomass [5,6,7].
The high moisture content of the fresh biomass limits its use in the food industry [8]; therefore, biomass dehydration allows the shelf life of Spirulina to be significantly extended and allows for its easy incorporation into foods and drinks. However, regardless of the drying method used and how well it is managed, there is a loss of various thermolabile and/or easily oxidizable nutritional and bioactive compounds when compared to the fresh product [9,10]. For this reason, many companies in recent years have begun to market fresh biomass, thus trying to offer consumers a product with unchanged nutritional and functional characteristics [11]. Generally, these methods are complex and expensive; moreover, the consumer may not accept the Spirulina food/beverage produced by the above methods due to the overly intense blue-green color and the fishy taste and smell conferred by the addition of Spirulina [12,13,14,15]. The embedment of the Spirulina biomass using various coating matrices could be one effective solution to these problems. For this purpose, different encapsulation techniques such as liposomes and extrusion (or spherification) have been applied to Spirulina powder [16,17,18,19,20].
The aims of this research were the production of spheres of fresh, living Spirulina to be used on their own as a food supplement, the fortification of an experimental yogurt in order to verify the effect of the Spirulina spheres on the LAB, and the verification of the continued viability of Spirulina in the spheres either in contact with the yogurt or not.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Arthrospira platensis and Growth Conditions

The strain of Arthrospira platensis ULC 445 was purchased from BCCM/UCL Cyanobacteria Culture Collection of the University of Liège (Liège, Belgium).
To obtain broth cultures of Spirulina, the strain was inoculated at 1% in the Zarrouk medium [21] (pH 9.0) and incubated in a growth chamber (M120-RHL, MPM Instruments s.r.l., Bernareggio, Italy) at 27 °C illuminated by red and blue LEDs with 100 µmolphoton·m−2·s−1 photon flux under a photoperiod light/dark of 12:12 h and thrice daily shaking for 13 days.

2.2. Spirulina Spheres Production

To produce Spirulina spheres, sodium alginate and calcium lactate (Special Ingredients, Savona, Italy) were used. In order to establish the best concentrations of sodium alginate and calcium lactate, a preliminary direct spherification trial was carried out (Figure 1).
For this purpose, sterile sodium alginate solutions at 3% and 2%, calcium lactate solutions at 2.5% and 1.5%, and Spirulina broth cultures grown under the conditions reported in Section 2.1 were used. Four combinations of sodium alginate and calcium lactate were considered: 3% sodium alginate either with 2.5% or 1.5% calcium lactate and 2% sodium alginate either with 2.5% or 1.5% calcium lactate. The spherification process was carried out under a laminar flow hood using materials and tools properly sterilized in an autoclave or sanitized with denatured ethyl alcohol (70% v/v).
The Spirulina broth culture was centrifuged for 15 min at 5000 rpm and 4 °C. Then, the supernatant was removed and the sodium alginate solution—3% or 2%—was added and mixed into the Spirulina biomass using a sterile steel spatula until homogenous mixtures were obtained. Subsequently, each mixture was dripped from a height of 8 cm using a 10 mL sterile syringe without a needle (diameter 2 mm) into two calcium lactate baths—2.5% or 1.5%—and stirred at a speed of 200 rpm.
The spheres formed instantly when in contact with the calcium lactate bath and they visually resembled roe. They remained in the calcium lactate bath for approximately 30 s, after which they were removed and rinsed with sterile deionized water to remove the calcium lactate residue.
Fifty grams of spheres for each combination of sodium alginate and calcium lactate concentration were obtained. Twenty spheres for each type of sodium alginate and calcium lactate combination were taken randomly and analyzed by ImageJ (https://imagej.net/ij/docs/) to measure their diameter. Briefly, the images of the samples together with a ruler were captured by a Nikon D700 camera (Nikon, Corporations, Tokyo, Japan); then, they were calibrated before measuring the diameters using ImageJ tools. Moreover, they were qualitatively evaluated by macroscopic observation during stirring and by manual compression.

2.3. Yogurt Preparation

To prepare the yogurt, semi-skimmed UHT milk (Arborea, Oristano, Italy) and a plain yogurt (Spesotti, Coop, Casalecchio di Reno, BO, Italy) were used. The LAB composition of the plain yogurt reported on the label was Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus.
Briefly, 1 L of milk was mixed with approximately 125 mL of the commercial yogurt. Then, the mixture was divided into 125 mL glass jars that were closed with screw lids, incubated at 42 °C for 8 h, stored at 4 °C for 12 h. Then, part of yogurt was fortified with Spirulina spheres and part of it remained unfortified and used as a control. For each analysis time and each type of sample (fortified and unfortified) three replicates were prepared.

2.4. Fortification of Yogurt with Spirulina Spheres (Main Trials)

Based on the results of the preliminary trial, the concentration of 3–1.5% of sodium alginate and calcium lactate, respectively, was chosen and used to carry out the main trial. The spheres obtained (250 g) were partly stored in sterile Falcon tubes (control samples) and partly added to yogurt (Figure 2).
Table 1 reports the sample types used and their acronyms. For each yogurt jar, 10 g of Spirulina spheres containing 0.76% Spirulina biomass were added (samples labeled Y+S).
Yogurt without spheres (samples labeled Y) and Spirulina spheres not in contact with yogurt (samples labeled S) were used as controls. All samples were prepared in triplicate. All samples were stored in the dark at 4 °C and analyzed by destructive method (different samples for each time point) across 15 days.

2.5. pH and LABs Enumeration

After mixing with a sterile spatula to homogenize the sample, the pH of the yogurt Y and Y+S was measured in triplicate using a pH meter with a probe for semi-solid foods (Hanna Instruments HI 99161, Villafranca Padovana, PD, Italy) at 0, 2, 6, 8, 10 and 15 days.
The yogurt samples—Y and Y+S—were homogenized (1:10) in 0.9% NaCl (w/v) solution using a Stomacher type homogenizer (Astori Tecnica, Poncarale, BS, Italy) for 2 min at maximum speed, serial diluted and subsequently plated by spreading technique onto De Man–Rogosa–Sharpe (MRS) agar using MRS broth (BioMaxima, Lublin, Poland) and bacteriological agar (18 g L−1—VWR International, Leuven, Belgium) for L. bulgaricus, and M17 agar (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, TE, Italy) for S. thermophilus. In particular, the MRS medium was acidified with lactic acid up to a value of 5.4 [22]. To analyze the Y+S yogurt samples, the Spirulina spheres were removed using a sterile slotted spoon and the yogurt was analyzed as previously described. All plates were incubated in anaerobic jars and sachets (Thermo ScientificTM rectangular jar and AnaeroGenTM compact sachet, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 37 °C for 48–72 h. At the end of the incubation, the colonies were counted and analyzed to obtain Log CFU/g. The analyses were performed in triplicate at 0, 2, 6, 8, 10 and 15 days.
The recovered Spirulina spheres from the Y+S samples were used to verify the viability of the Spirulina (see Section 2.6).

2.6. Spirulina Viability Check

The Spirulina’s viability was assessed on both S samples (spheres stored in the dark at 4 °C) and Y+S samples (spheres recovered from yogurt stored in the dark at 4 °C) using Zarrouk medium as control. It was measured spectrophotometrically in triplicate by recording the absorbance at 550 nm (OD550nm) using the Spectrophotometer UV-1800 (Shimatzu, Kyoto, Japan) (samples and control volume of 2 mL, plastic cuvette with path length of 10 mm) at T0 (immediately after the preparation of spheres and their addition to the yogurt) and at two days after each analysis time (2, 6, 8, 10, and 15 days), therefore at 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, and 17 days of incubation at the condition reported in Section 2.1. For Y+S samples, the spheres were separated from the yogurt by a sterile slotted spoon, rinsed several times with sterile deionized water, and then subjected to the following procedure.
At each analysis time, both the S and Y+S Spirulina spheres were homogenized (1:10) in 0.9% NaCl (w/v) solution by a Stomacher type homogenizer (Astori Tecnica, Poncarale, BS, Italy) for 2 min at maximum speed. Subsequently, the homogenates were inoculated at 5% in Zarrouk medium and incubated in a growth chamber under the same conditions described for Spirulina cultivation. Moreover, Spirulina’s viability was verified by monitoring its growth with daily macroscopic observation, and with microscopic observation without staining procedures with 20× magnification by using an optical microscope (Olympus BX53, Tokyo, Japan).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The analyses were carried out by SPSS program (version 15.0) considering p < 0.05. One-way ANOVA was performed for sphere diameter data; two-way ANOVA test was performed on the entire dataset to analyze the interactions between pH, time, and Y and S treatments, between LAB load, time, and Y and S treatments, and for Y and S Spirulina culture spectrophotometer data.

3. Results

3.1. Preliminary Trial

Four types of spheres were obtained that differed from each other in the concentrations of sodium alginate (3–2%) and calcium lactate (2.5–1.5%). Table 2 shows the diameter and the qualitative characteristics of the spheres obtained with the two concentrations of sodium alginate and the two of calcium lactate.
The highest sodium alginate and calcium lactate combination significantly increased (p < 0.05) the diameter of the spheres compared to the other combinations. The combinations 3–1.5% and 2–1.5% had smaller diameters than the 3% and 2.5% combination and did not differ significantly from each other. The spheres with 2–2.5% combination were significantly different (p < 0.05) from spheres with 3–1.5% and 2–1.5% combination of sodium alginate and calcium lactate. Concerning the qualitative characteristics of the spheres, the alginate 3% and calcium lactate 2.5% led to the formation of spheres that remained undamaged during the stirring in the calcium bath and that were hard and completely solidified. The spheres obtained using the combination 3–1.5% and 2–2.5% of sodium alginate and calcium lactate gave spheres which remained undamaged during the stirring in the calcium bath, fairly resistant to manual compression, but which were not completely solidified, and released liquid on being broken. Therefore, they were characterized by a thin external layer and a liquid core. The combination 2–1.5% of sodium alginate and calcium lactate formed spheres easily breakable both during the stirring in the calcium bath and by manual compression.
The spheres obtained from 3–2.5% of sodium alginate and calcium lactate, respectively, were discarded for their size and their behavior when crushed, while the spheres obtained from 2–1.5% of sodium alginate and calcium lactate, respectively, were discarded for their fragility. Although both the spheres from combination 3–1.5% and 2–2.5% of sodium alginate and calcium lactate exhibited the best size and qualitative characteristics (Table 2), those with 3–1.5% of sodium alginate and calcium lactate, respectively, were chosen because the lower concentration of calcium lactate would theoretically make the taste of the spheres less bitter.

3.2. Main Trials—pH and LABs

Table 3 reports the pH values of the yogurt and the yogurt fortified with Spirulina spheres over the 15-day period. For both the Y and Y+S samples, a significant reduction (p < 0.05) was observed between day 0 and the subsequent analysis times. The addition of Spirulina and the progress of time significantly affect (p < 0.05) the pH of the yogurts. The addition of Spirulina spheres to yogurt determined significant pH differences at 2 days (p < 0.05) compared to the unfortified yogurts at 6, 8, 10, and 15 days. Moreover, the progress of time significantly affected (p < 0.05) the pH of fortified samples at 2, 6, and 15 days.
Figure 3 shows the loads of L. bulgaricus (a) and S. thermophilus (b) of Y and Y+S at the different analysis times. The incorporation of Spirulina promoted the growth of LABs, as demonstrated by the higher colony counts observed in the fortified samples relative to the controls. Indeed, the LAB loads of Y+S were higher than those of Y, although the differences were not always significant. At the end of the storage time, L. bulgaricus showed a significant (p < 0.05) 2.66% load increase in Y+S compared to a 0.84% increase in Y, while S. thermophilus showed a 1.64% load increase in Y+S compared to a 0.82% decrease in Y and significant differences (p < 0.05) at 6 days.

3.3. Main Trials—Viability of Spirulina Embedded in Alginate Spheres

Table 4 shows the optical densities against time of the Spirulina embedded in S and Y+S spheres.
Spirulina remained viable only in the S samples, that is, the Spirulina spheres stored in the dark at 4° not in contact with the yogurt. In contrast, the Y+S (in contact with the yogurt) were able to grow at the start of the trial, that is, spheres that were produced, added to the yogurt, and immediately taken for analysis. But the spheres did not survive in contact with yogurt as the analysis time progressed. Irrespective of time, Y+S samples at 0 days and all S samples showed significant differences (p < 0.05) compared to the other samples. The optical density (OD) results were matched with macroscopic and microscopic observation of the different Spirulina cultures up to 17 days. As time progressed, the inoculated Spirulina samples showed the presence of biomass of the typical green-blue color in contrast to the uninoculated Zarrouk medium that remained clear. Therefore, the OD values refer to the presence of viable cells. Figure 4 shows the microscopic images of Spirulina taken from S samples during the viability test. As can be observed, the cells have the typical spiral shape and blue-green color, which indicates the healthy state of the culture.

4. Discussion

The ever-growing interest both in functional food and food supplements led us to formulate a fresh Spirulina biomass embedded into alginate spheres. These spheres may potentially remain viable and be used either by consumers as a supplement for yogurt or other foods and drinks, or by companies to produce fortified foods/drinks.
This study involved two aspects: the Spirulina retained viability in S samples and the potential compound release in Y+S samples.
Fresh Spirulina alginate spheres were obtained by direct spherification technique. The alginate (1–4%) and the cross-linker concentrations are important factors affecting the structure of the spheres. The qualitative characteristics of the Spirulina spheres here produced are in agreement with Bennacef et al. [23], who reported that the higher the concentration of alginate the greater the hardness and thickness of the spheres while the greater the concentration of calcium the greater the fragility of the spheres. Although the sphere characteristics derived from qualitative observations, they were useful in choosing the ratio of sodium alginate-calcium lactate to use for the spherification process of the main trial.
The incorporation of Spirulina spheres was found to stimulate the growth of both L. bulgaricus and S. thermophilus throughout the storage time, corroborating previous findings on the prebiotic potential of Spirulina-derived compounds. The results regarding pH and LAB are consistent with those reported by other authors. Indeed, the reduction in pH in samples enriched with Spirulina was justified by the fact that the microalga promotes the development of LAB in yogurt and consequently acidification [24,25]. Our results regarding the stimulatory effect of Spirulina spheres on LAB are in agreement with several authors who highlighted that Spirulina, even in a non-spherical form, when added to fermented dairy products, favors the development of LAB [25,26,27,28,29]. Indeed, Spirulina can act as prebiotic stimulating the LAB due to minerals, vitamins, free amino acids, phenolic compounds, and exopolysaccharides [30,31,32,33]. In particular, oligosaccharides such as rhamnose, mannose, xylose, and galactose produced by Spirulina are reported as LAB booster [34,35,36]. Dried or fresh Spirulina at different concentrations positively affects LAB growth: Bchir [12] reports that the addition of 0.5% fresh Spirulina to yogurt gave the highest S. thermophilus loads after 15 d of storage as compared to yogurt with the addition of dried Spirulina and to unfortified yogurt. The addition of 1% of Spirulina powder to yogurt determined, after one week, higher Lactobacillus acidophilus loads (7.92 Log CFU/mL) compared to the control yogurt [37]. The addition of 0.8% of Spirulina powder to yogurt led to higher L. bulgaricus (7.0 Log CFU/mL) and S. thermophilus (8.5 Log CFU/mL) counts compared to the unfortified product [24]. Similar results for S. thermophilus are reported with the addition of 0.6% of Spirulina powder in fermented milks [38]. Spirulina powder (0.5–1%) added to yogurt had a positive effect on L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and S. thermophilus, whose concentration was higher than 106 CFU/g compared to the control yogurt [31]. Yogurt enriched with Spirulina powder exhibited higher loads of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis compared to the unenriched yogurt [39]. Dried Spirulina has been reported as a suitable growth substrate for Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 8014 since after 72 h it reached a concentration about of 105 Log CFU/mL in soybean drink with added Spirulina [40]. To the best of our knowledge, studies concerning the addition of encapsulated dried Spirulina have regarded the physicochemical, antioxidant, and sensory aspects of yogurts [7,20,41]. Recently, Yağmur [42] has reported the LAB stimulatory effect of microcapsules containing pomegranate and Spirulina extracts added to yogurts, while, as previously said, no papers have reported the encapsulation of fresh Spirulina and its use to fortify yogurt. To validate the hypothesis that the LAB booster effect observed in the present paper by the fresh Spirulina spheres is determined by the release into the yogurt of Spirulina bioactive compounds, future investigations on their chemical quantification are needed.
Alginate gel has a porous nature that allows for the diffusion of compounds in or out of the spheres. The higher the density of the alginate, the lower the permeability [43]. Another study has reported the role of the calcium chloride in substance diffusion; the higher its concentration, the lower the release [44]. Also, it was reported that release of Spirulina from spheres occurs by alginate matrix erosion [45]. Moreover, in a low-pH environment the alginate matrix undergoes shrinking with a decrease in pore size [43], which consequently affects the diffusion of compounds. The interaction of the above-reported mechanisms may explain the effect of Spirulina spheres on the LAB as a consequence of the release of Spirulina and its bioactive compounds into the yogurts; as stated above, their role needs to be verified in order to validate both this hypothesis and the production methodology.
The OD measurement is reported as a method to estimate microalgae biomass and used to monitor the growth of cells over time [46,47]. OD does not measure the percentage of living cells, but increasing OD values indicate that the culture is growing and viable. Therefore, the increasing OD values of the Spirulina spheres inoculated in fresh Zarrouk, together with the macroscopic observation of the cultures showing presence of biomass, proved the viability of the Spirulina embedded in the alginate spheres not in contact with yogurt. On the other hand, the observed loss of viability of Spirulina in Y+S samples is probably due to the excessively low pH conditions of the yogurt detected throughout the 15 days compared to the optimum range of 8.5–11 for Spirulina [48]. As reported above, a possible cause of the death of the sphere-embedded Spirulina in contact with yogurt is the diffusion of the acids inside the spheres, due to the permeability of the alginate matrix. Although contact with yogurt ultimately leads to the death of the Spirulina in the spheres, its bioactive molecules should remain unaltered since the biomass of Spirulina used was fresh and viable, and no processes able to cause compound degradation, such as high temperatures, were used. This conclusion needs to be further verified by molecular investigations. Consequently, the loss of viability of Spirulina within the yogurt matrix may not be detrimental, as the release of bioactive compounds could still confer functional benefits.
In order to protect the viability of Spirulina, potential future improvements could be to vary the parameters of spherification, such as sodium alginate and calcium lactate concentration and/or coating the alginate spheres using polycations, such as chitosan, or hydrophobic waxes that form an outer layer on the surface of the spheres and confer a barrier against the diffusion of the compounds in and out of the spheres [49,50,51,52,53].
An important step for novel food products is the sensory analysis that gives information on their taste, aroma, texture, appearance, and global acceptance by consumers [54]. Therefore, future sensory investigations are paramount to ascertain not only consumers’ acceptance of the novel yogurt enriched with fresh Spirulina spheres but also consumers’ propensity to use the novel Spirulina formulation to fortify any food preparation.

5. Conclusions

The novelty of this study focused on the maintenance of the viability of Spirulina embedded in alginate spheres, as well as their addition to yogurt. The continued viability of these spheres, when stored in the dark at 4 °C and not in contact with yogurt, demonstrated the technical feasibility of this new formulation of fresh Spirulina, which can be refrigerated and added to any food preparation.
While Spirulina viability was compromised in the yogurt matrix, this may still offer benefits due to the potential release of bioactive compounds. On the other hand, changing the spherification parameters could lead to the production of impermeable spheres that prevent the acidity of the yogurt from damaging the Spirulina. Further studies about the release and the maintenance of the compounds’ bioactivity are required to prove their potential functional benefit both for S and Y+S Spirulina spheres. Although, the visual appearance of the novel fortified yogurt with fresh Spirulina spheres suggests potential for improved consumer acceptability, this needs to be ascertained by panel test validation. Optimizing the spherification parameters, the controlled release of the compounds, and the sensory evaluation of the lab-scale novel products will be useful starting points for industrial scalability. Also necessary for large scale production is the adaptation of the Spirulina growth parameters, so as to process large volumes of Spirulina culture in reactors of progressively larger dimensions, and a scaling-up of the spherification system. Overall, this study demonstrates a promising strategy for the incorporation of fresh Spirulina into functional foods. Further research is warranted to optimize encapsulation parameters, confirm compound bioavailability, and assess sensory acceptability for potential industrial applications.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, investigation, and writing—review and editing, D.S. and M.R.P.; data curation, writing—review and editing, conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, review and editing, and supervision, R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Marjanovíc, B.; Benkovíc, M.; Jurina, T.; Cvetníc, T.S.; Valinger, D.; Jasenka Gajdoš Kljusuríc, J.G.; Tušek, A.J. Bioactive compounds from Spirulina spp.—Nutritional value, extraction, and application in food industry. Separations 2024, 11, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gogna, S.; Kaur, J.; Sharma, K.; Prasad, R.; Singh, J.; Bhadariya, V.; Kumar, P.; Jarial, S. Spirulina—An edible Cyanobacterium with potential therapeutic health benefits and toxicological consequences. J. Am. Nutr. Ass. 2023, 42, 559–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sidari, R.; Tofalo, R. A comprehensive overview on microalgal-fortified/based food and beverages. Food Rev. Int. 2019, 35, 778–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fan, Z.; Shahid, A.; Su, K.; Zhao, A.; Zhang, B.; Xu, J. Comprehensive analysis of the effects of fresh Spirulina microcapsules on protein cross-linking and structural changes in wheat noodles. Food Chem. 2025, 482, 144034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Garofalo, C.; Norici, A.; Mollo, L.; Osimani, A.; Aquilanti, L. Fermentation of microalgal biomass for innovative food production. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Barkallah, M.; Dammak, M.; Louati, I.; Hentati, F.; Hadrich, B.; Mechichi, T.; Ayadi, M.A.; Fendri, I.; Attia, H.; Abdelkafi, S. Effect of Spirulina platensis fortification on physicochemical, textural, antioxidant and sensory properties of yogurt during fermentation and storage. LWT 2017, 84, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. da Silva, S.C.; Fernandes, I.P.; Barros, L.; Fernandes, Â.; Alves, M.J.; Calhelha, R.C.; Pereira, C.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Manrique, Y.; Colla, E.; et al. Spray-dried Spirulina platensis as an effective ingredient to improve yogurt formulations: Testing different encapsulating solutions. J. Func. Foods 2019, 60, 103427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Özyurt, G.; Uslu, L.; Durmuş, M.; Sakarya, Y.; Uzlaşir, T.; Küley, E. Chemical and physical characterization of microencapsulated Spirulina fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum. Algal Res. 2023, 73, 103149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Papalia, T.; Sidari, R.; Panuccio, M.R. Impact of different storage methods on bioactive compounds in Arthrospira platensis biomass. Molecules 2019, 24, 2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luo, G.; Liu, H.; Yang, S.; Sun, Z.; Sun, L.; Wang, L. Manufacturing processes, additional nutritional value and versatile food applications of fresh microalgae Spirulina. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1455553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, Z.; Ahmed, F.; Yuan, B.; Zhang, W. Fresh living Arthrospira as dietary supplements: Current status and challenges. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 88, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bchir, B.; Felfoul, I.; Bouaziz, M.A.; Gharred, T.; Yaich, H.; Noumi, E.; Snoussi, M.; Bejaoui, H.; Kenzali, Y.; Blecker, C.; et al. Investigation of physicochemical, nutritional, textural, and sensory properties of yoghurt fortified with fresh and dried Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis). Int. Food Res. J. 2019, 26, 1565–1576. [Google Scholar]
  13. Patel, P.; Jethani, H.; Radha, C.; Vijayendra, S.V.N.; Mudliar, S.N.; Sarada, R.; Chauhan, V.S. Development of a carotenoid enriched probiotic yogurt from fresh biomass of Spirulina and its characterization. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 3721–3731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Martelli, F.; Alinovi, M.; Bernini, V.; Gatti, M.; Bancalari, E. Arthrospira platensis as natural fermentation booster for milk and soy fermented beverages. Foods 2020, 9, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jia, X.; Cui, H.; Qin, S.; Ren, J.; Zhang, Z.; An, Q.; Zhang, N.; Yang, J.; Yang, Y.; Fan, G.; et al. Characterizing and decoding the key odor compounds of Spirulina platensis at different processing stages by sensomics. Food Chem. 2024, 461, 140944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vieira, M.V.; Pastrana, L.M.; Fuciños, P. Microalgae encapsulation systems for food, pharmaceutical and cosmetics applications. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Machado, A.R.; Assis, L.M.; Costa, J.A.V.; Badiale-Furlong, E.; Motta, A.S.; Micheletto, Y.M.S.; Souza-Soares, L.A. Application of sonication and mixing for nanoencapsulation of the cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis in liposomes. Int. Food Res. J. 2015, 22, 96–101. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rajmohan, D.; Bellmer, D. Characterization of Spirulina-alginate beads formed using ionic gelation. Int. J. Food Sci. 2019, 2019, 7101279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zen, C.K.; Vicenzi Tiepo, C.B.; Vieira da Silva, R.; Oliveira Reinehr, C.; Gutkoski, L.C.; Oro, T.; Colla, L.M. Development of functional pasta with microencapsulated Spirulina: Technological and sensorial effects. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 2018–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nourmohammadi, N.; Soleimanian-Zada, S.; Shekarchizadeha, H. Effect of Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) microencapsulated in alginate and whey protein concentrate addition on physicochemical and organoleptic properties of functional stirred yogurt. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 5260–5268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Madkour, F.F.; Kamil, A.E.-W.; Nasr, H.S. Production and nutritive value of Spirulina platensis in reduced cost media. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2012, 38, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garofalo, G.; Ponte, M.; Busetta, G.; Tolone, M.; Bonanno, A.; Portolano, B.; Gaglio, R.; Erten, H.; Sardina, M.T.; Settanni, L. A thorough investigation of the microbiological, physicochemical, and sensory properties of ewe’s yoghurt fermented by a selected multi-strain starter culture. Foods 2023, 12, 3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bennacef, C.; Desobry-Banon, S.; Probst, L.; Desobry, S. Advances on alginate use for spherification to encapsulate biomolecules. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 118, 106782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fadaei, V.; Mohamadi-Alasti, F.; Khosravi-Darani, K. Influence of Spirulina platensis powder on the starter culture viability in probiotic yoghurt containing spinach during cold storage. Eur. J. Exp. Biol. 2013, 3, 389–393. [Google Scholar]
  25. Agustini, T.W.; Soetrisnanto, D.; Ma’ruf, W.F. Study on chemical, physical, microbiological and sensory of yoghurt enriched by Spirulina platensis. Int. Food Res. J. 2017, 24, 367–371. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mocanu, G.; Botez, E.; Nistor, O.V.; Andronoiu, D.G.; Vlăsceanu, G. Influence of Spirulina platensis biomass over some starter culture of lactic bacteria. J. Agroaliment. Process. Technol. 2013, 19, 474–479. [Google Scholar]
  27. Alizadeh Khaledabad, M.; Ghasempour, Z.; Moghaddas Kia, E.; Rezazad Bari, M.; Zarrin, R. Probiotic yoghurt functionalised with microalgae and Zedo gum: Chemical, microbiological, rheological and sensory characteristics. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2020, 73, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Çelekli, A.; Alslibi, Z.A.; Bozkurt, H. Influence of incorporated Spirulina platensis on the growth of microflora and physicochemical properties of ayran as a functional food. Algal Res. 2019, 44, 101710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Çelekli, A.; Alslibi, Z.A.; Bozkurt, H. Boosting effects of Spirulina platensis, whey protein, and probiotics on the growth of microflora and the nutritional value of ayran. Eng. Rep. 2020, 2, e12235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. de Caire, G.Z.; Parada, J.L. Effect of Spirulina platensis biomass on the growth of lactic acid bacteria in milk. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 16, 563–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guldas, M.; Irkin, R. Influence of Spirulina platensis powder on the microflora of yoghurt and acidophilus milk. Mljekarstvo časopis Unaprjeđenje Proizv. Prerade Mlijek 2010, 60, 237–243. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gyenis, B.; Szigeti, J.; Molnár, N.; Varga, L. Use of dried microalgal biomasses to stimulate acid production and growth of Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecium in milk. Acta Ag. Kaposváriensis 2005, 9, 53–59. [Google Scholar]
  33. Parada, J. Lactic acid bacteria growth promoters from Spirulina platensis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 45, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pascal, G.; Denery, S.; Bodinier, M. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: Impact on the gut immune system and allergic reactions. J. Leuk. Biol. 2011, 89, 685–695. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ganchev, I. Impact of Spirulina platensis biomass on the viability of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus strain during the freeze-drying process. BioTechnologia 2024, 105, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kahraman Ilıkkan, Ö.; Bağdat, E.Ş.; Yalçın, D. Evaluation of prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic potentials of microalgae. Food Health 2022, 8, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Beheshtipour, H.; Mortazavian, A.M.; Haratian, P.; Darani, K.K. Effects of Chlorella vulgaris and Arthrospira platensis addition on viability of probiotic bacteria in yogurt and its biochemical properties. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2012, 235, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Luwidharto, J.C.N.; Rahayu, E.S.; Suroto, D.A.; Wikandari, R.; Ulfah, A.; Utami, T. Effects of Spirulina platensis addition on growth of Lactobacillus plantarum Dad 13 and Streptococcus thermophilus Dad 11 in fermented milk and physicochemical characteristics of the product. Appl. Food Biotechnol. 2022, 9, 205–216. [Google Scholar]
  39. Dinçoğlu, A.H.; Akça, S.S.; Çalişkan, Z. Effect of Spirulina platensis on probiotic, nutritional, and quality properties of yogurt. Int. Food Res. J. 2024, 31, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Niccolai, A.; Bažec, K.; Rodolfi, L.; Biondi, N.; Zlatić, E.; Jamnik, P.; Tredici, M.R. Lactic acid fermentation of Arthrospira platensis (Spirulina) in a vegetal soybean drink for developing new functional lactose-free beverages. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 560684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yağmur, N.; Şahin, S.; Ersan, L.I. Bio-yoghurt enriched with Spirulina-encapsulated pomegranate peel: Impact on some metabolomics, antioxidative, textural and colour properties. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 2024, 77, 724–734. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yağmur, N.; Şahin, S.; Akyildiz, G. The effect of pomegranate peel extracts coated with Spirulina microalgae supplementation on physicochemical, microbiological and sensorial properties of yoghurts during storage. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 58, 3180–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ching, S.H.; Bansa, N.; Bhandari, B. Alginate gel particles–A review of production techniques and physical properties. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 1133–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Badwan, A.A.; Abumalooh, A.; Sallam, E.; Abukalaf, A.; Jawan, O. A sustained release drug delivery system using calcium alginate beads. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1985, 11, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Castillo-Barzola, A.; Paisig, H.L.; Faieta, M.; Jordán-Suárez, O.; Porras-Sosa, E.; Tuesta, T. Effect of microencapsulation by spray drying on the protein content of Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis). Ital. J. Food Sci. 2025, 37, 423–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Beal, J.; Farny, N.G.; Haddock-Angelli, T.; Selvarajah, V.; Baldwin, G.S.; Buckley-Taylor, R.; Gershater, M.; Kiga, D.; Marken, J.; Sanchania, V.; et al. Robust estimation of bacterial cell count from optical density. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Malletzidou, L.; Kyratzopoulou, E.; Kyzaki, N.; Nerantzis, E.; Kazakis, N.A. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for growth estimation of Spirulina platensis cultures. Methods Protoc. 2024, 7, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Venkatasamy, J.K.; Duraisamy, R.; Chockalingam, V. The growth performance of Spirulina platensis on media supplemented with digested poultry droppings slurry of biogas plant. Asian J. Biol. Life Sci. 2024, 13, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Heidebach, T.; Forst, P.; Kulozik, U. Microencapsulation of probiotic cells for food applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 291–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tovar López, S.; Rodríguez Andrade, V.A.; Reyes Salazar, C.O.; García Manríques, L.F.; Medina García, M.F.; Hernández de la Peña, F.J. Spheres of Spirulina and/or Nutraceuticals Impervious to Aqueous Media for Incorporation into Food Matrices and Methods and Processes for Producing Said Spheres. WO2017176103A1, 12 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ramdhan, T.; Ching, S.H.; Prakash, S.; Bhandari, B. Physical and mechanical properties of alginate based composite gels. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 106, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fernando, P.U.A.I.; Kennedy, A.J.; Pokrzywinski, K.; Jernberg, J.; Thornell, T.; George, G.; Kosgei, G.K.; Wang, Y.; Coyne, K.J. Development of alginate beads for precise environmental release applications: A design of experiment based approach and analysis. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 351, 119872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. da Silva, A.F.; Moreira, A.F.; Miguel, S.P.; Coutinho, P. Recent advances in microalgae encapsulation techniques for biomedical applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 333, 103297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mihafu, F.D.; Issa, J.Y.; Kamiyango, M.W. Implication of sensory evaluation and quality assessment in food product development: A review. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. 2020, 08, 690–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Graphical representation of the experimental design for different Spirulina spheres formulations: sodium alginate 3% and calcium lactate 2.5%, sodium alginate 3% and calcium lactate 1.5%, sodium alginate 2% and calcium lactate 2.5%, and sodium alginate 2% and calcium lactate 1.5%.
Figure 1. Graphical representation of the experimental design for different Spirulina spheres formulations: sodium alginate 3% and calcium lactate 2.5%, sodium alginate 3% and calcium lactate 1.5%, sodium alginate 2% and calcium lactate 2.5%, and sodium alginate 2% and calcium lactate 1.5%.
Microorganisms 13 01641 g001
Figure 2. Spirulina spheres and yogurt fortified with Spirulina spheres, storage conditions, and analyses carried out up to 15 days.
Figure 2. Spirulina spheres and yogurt fortified with Spirulina spheres, storage conditions, and analyses carried out up to 15 days.
Microorganisms 13 01641 g002
Figure 3. Increase in load of L. bulgaricus grown in MRS agar (a) and of S. thermophilus in M17 agar (b) detected in fortified yogurt fortified with Spirulina spheres (Microorganisms 13 01641 i001) compared to the control yogurt samples (Microorganisms 13 01641 i002) across 15 days. Values are mean ± standard deviation. Means with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Increase in load of L. bulgaricus grown in MRS agar (a) and of S. thermophilus in M17 agar (b) detected in fortified yogurt fortified with Spirulina spheres (Microorganisms 13 01641 i001) compared to the control yogurt samples (Microorganisms 13 01641 i002) across 15 days. Values are mean ± standard deviation. Means with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 13 01641 g003
Figure 4. Arthrospira platensis ULC 445 from S samples observed without staining procedures under the optical microscope Olympus BX53 (magnification 20×).
Figure 4. Arthrospira platensis ULC 445 from S samples observed without staining procedures under the optical microscope Olympus BX53 (magnification 20×).
Microorganisms 13 01641 g004
Table 1. Acronyms of the different sample types.
Table 1. Acronyms of the different sample types.
SamplesAcronyms
Unenriched Spirulina yogurtY
Spirulina spheresS
Yogurt enriched with Spirulina spheresY+S
Table 2. Diameter and qualitative characteristics of Spirulina spheres obtained by mixing two concentrations of sodium alginate and two concentrations of calcium lactate.
Table 2. Diameter and qualitative characteristics of Spirulina spheres obtained by mixing two concentrations of sodium alginate and two concentrations of calcium lactate.
Spheres TypesDiameters (mm)Qualitative Characteristics
SA 3%—CL 2.5% 8.8 ± 0.02 acompletely solidified and hard
SA 3%—CL 1.5%5.0 ± 0.01 bthin external film, fairly resistant
SA 2%—CL 2.5%4.6 ± 0.02 cthin external film, fairly resistant
SA 2%—CL 1.5%5.1 ± 0.02 beasily breakable
SA: sodium alginate; CL: calcium lactate. Values are mean and standard deviation (n = 20). Means with different lowercase superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 3. pH values of the yogurt (Y) and yogurt fortified with Spirulina spheres (Y+S) monitored across 15 days.
Table 3. pH values of the yogurt (Y) and yogurt fortified with Spirulina spheres (Y+S) monitored across 15 days.
SamplesDays
02681015
Y4.26 ± 0.00 a4.12 ± 0.01 bc4.10 ± 0.01 cd4.11 ± 0.00 cd4.11 ± 0.01 cd4.04 ± 0.00 e
Y+S4.26 ± 0.01 a4.14 ± 0.01 b4.11 ± 0.01 cd4.14 ± 0.00 b4.14 ± 0.01 b4.08 ± 0.01 d
Values are mean ± standard deviation. Means with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Growth of Spirulina embedded in S and Y+S spheres by spectrophotometric analysis (OD550nm) cultured in Zarrouk medium at the start of the trials and at two days after each analysis time (2, 6, 8, 10, and 15 days).
Table 4. Growth of Spirulina embedded in S and Y+S spheres by spectrophotometric analysis (OD550nm) cultured in Zarrouk medium at the start of the trials and at two days after each analysis time (2, 6, 8, 10, and 15 days).
SamplesDays
0248101217
S0.254 ± 0.016 a0.256 ± 0.021 a0.250 ± 0.007 a0.252 ± 0.011 a0.246 ± 0.012 a0.255 ± 0.009 a0.2515 ± 0.005 a
Y+S0.251 ± 0.003 a0.000 ± 0.000 b0.000 ± 0.000 b0.000 ± 0.000 b0.000 ± 0.000 b0.000 ± 0.000 b0.000 ± 0.000 b
Zarrouk medium0.000 ± 0.000 b0.000 ± 0.000 b0.000 ± 0.000 b0.000 ± 0.000 b0.000 ± 0.000 b0.000 ± 0.000 b0.000 ± 0.000 b
Values are mean ± standard deviation. Means with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Siclari, D.; Panuccio, M.R.; Sidari, R. Encapsulation of Fresh Spirulina Biomass in Alginate Spheres for Yogurt Fortification. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071641

AMA Style

Siclari D, Panuccio MR, Sidari R. Encapsulation of Fresh Spirulina Biomass in Alginate Spheres for Yogurt Fortification. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(7):1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071641

Chicago/Turabian Style

Siclari, Domenico, Maria Rosaria Panuccio, and Rossana Sidari. 2025. "Encapsulation of Fresh Spirulina Biomass in Alginate Spheres for Yogurt Fortification" Microorganisms 13, no. 7: 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071641

APA Style

Siclari, D., Panuccio, M. R., & Sidari, R. (2025). Encapsulation of Fresh Spirulina Biomass in Alginate Spheres for Yogurt Fortification. Microorganisms, 13(7), 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071641

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop