Next Article in Journal
Translating Patent Innovation into Clinical Practice: Two Decades of Therapeutic Advancements in Dysbiosis Management
Previous Article in Journal
Synergistic Recruitment of Symbiotic Fungi by Potting and Scleroderma bovista Inoculation Suppresses Pathogens in Hazel Rhizosphere Microbiomes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Odontites linkii subsp. cyprius Ethanolic Extract Indicated In Vitro Anti-Acanthamoeba Effect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of the Presence of Free-Living Amoebae in Soil Samples from the Northwest Region of Spain Using Culture and Molecular Assays

by
Patricia Pérez-Pérez
1,2,3,
Iván Rodríguez-Escolar
3,4,
Elizabeth Córdoba-Lanús
1,5,
Angélica Domínguez-de-Barros
1,5,
Omar García-Pérez
1,5,
José E. Piñero
1,2,5,
Rodrigo Morchón
3,4,6 and
Jacob Lorenzo-Morales
1,2,6,*
1
Instituto Universitario de Enfermedades Tropicales y Salud Pública de Canarias (IUETSPC), Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), 38206 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
2
Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Pediatría, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Toxicología, Medicina Legal y Forense y Parasitología, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
3
Zoonotic Infections and One Health GIR, Laboratory of Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
4
Centre for Environmental Studies and Rural Dynamization (CEADIR), University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
5
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
6
Biomedical Research Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(5), 1065; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051065 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 March 2025 / Revised: 29 April 2025 / Accepted: 30 April 2025 / Published: 2 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogenic Microbes in the Environment and Infectious Disease Control)

Abstract

:
Free-living amoebae (FLA) such as Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria fowleri, Sappinia spp., Vahlkampfia spp., and Vermamoeba vermiformis are naturally widespread in the environment, causing rare but fatal and debilitating infections in humans. In the present study, a total of 87 soil samples were collected from four provinces in the autonomous community of Castilla y León, Spain. These samples were collected in three different seasons during 2022–2023 (t1–t3) and were analysed by culture and molecular techniques (conventional PCR/sanger sequencing and qPCR). The obtained data revealed that the genus Acanthamoeba and the species Vermamoeba vermiformis were the most prevalent FLA. Furthermore, other genera/species of FLA were identified in the tested soil sources, suggesting a rich microbial biodiversity in Castilla y León soils. In addition, this study provides an important basis for future research on the ecology of these organisms and their potential impact on public health and the environment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Free-living amoebae (FLA) are aerobic, mitochondriate, eukaryotic protists widely distributed in nature, for example, in soils, freshwater, marine waters, and on the aerial parts of plants and animals. They are considered cosmopolitan in nature [1,2]. They include organisms from various supergroups such as Amoebozoa, Rhizaria, and Opisthokonta. Among the diverse FLA present in the environment, only a few genera and species, such as Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria fowleri, Sappinia pedata, Vahlkampfia spp., and Vermamoeba vermiformis, are pathogenic and opportunistic, capable of causing infections in humans and animals [3]. A number of Acanthamoeba species with various genotypes are responsible for the chronic illness known as granulomatous amoebic encephalitis (GAE), which mostly affects immunocompromised hosts, but it is also a causative agent of amoebic keratitis (AK) and skin lesions [4]. Balamuthia mandrillaris can also affect the central nervous system, causing Balamuthia amoebic encephalitis (BAE) in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent hosts, especially in very young or very old individuals. To a lesser extent, it can also cause epithelial lesions [3,5]. In contrast, children and young adults who have recently been in contact with warm freshwater are susceptible to an acute, fulminating, necrotizing infection of the central nervous system known as primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM) caused by Naegleria fowleri [6]. Sappinia pedata, previously described as S. diploidea, also has caused a case of amoebic meningoencephalitis [7]. AK can also be caused by other pathogenic FLA, such as Vermamoeba vermiformis and vahlkampfiid amoebae, not exclusively by Acanthamoeba [8,9,10]. As a result, V. vermiformis has been identified to act as a reservoir of pathogens and as the etiological agent of keratitis, a painful ulcer close to the eye, and meningoencephalitis [11,12,13]. In general, the life cycle of FLA consists of two stages: a vegetative trophozoite stage, and when cells are exposed to extreme circumstances, they differentiate into double-walled cysts [14], except for certain FLA, such as N. fowleri, which presents a flagellated stage [3].
The FLA of clinical relevance feed on bacteria in the environment, but some of these bacteria manage to resist digestion and survive inside, transforming FLA into microbial reservoirs. This interaction not only reveals a bacterial survival strategy but also connects directly to the ecological role of environmental FLA as regulators of microbial communities and key players in nutrient recycling in ecosystems [15,16]. On the other hand, they are widely studied throughout the world because these FLA infections are classified as emerging diseases, given that the number of cases reported globally is rising annually and that the incidence of climate change indicates that it will inevitably continue to rise [17,18].
However, environmental studies on FLA epidemiology are scarce in Spain, and most of them have been carried out on Acanthamoeba on the Canary Islands [19,20,21,22] and the central area of Spain [23,24] by sampling water from different sources. In fact, there is much unknown about the presence of these protozoa in the soils in Spain. Therefore, the following study has been undertaken to investigate the distribution and abundance of FLA (pathogenic and non-pathogenic FLA) in soil samples from the North Central Iberian Peninsula (autonomous community of Castilla y León) during three different periods of the year. Considering the outcomes, the goal is to increase public awareness by highlighting the grave risk that the soil poses to public health.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Location and Sampling

The sampling area was in the autonomous community of Castilla y León, Iberian Peninsula, Spain, with an area of 94,224 km2, which is the largest region in Spain and one of the largest in Europe. It is made up of 9 provinces (León, Zamora, Salamanca, Valladolid, Palencia, Burgos, Soria, Segovia, and Ávila). Castilla y León’s climate is classified as Mediterranean according to Köppen, meaning that it experiences short, warm summers (average temperatures of 19 to 22 °C) and lengthy, cold winters (average temperatures in January of 3 to 6 °C). Rainfall during the summer is minimal, with an average annual precipitation of approximately 450–500 mm, which is more pronounced in mountainous areas. Furthermore, various sub-climates can be identified due to the territory’s considerable extension and orographic diversity. A large part falls within the temperate with a dry summer (Csb) or temperate with a dry season and temperate summer (Cfb) sub-climates, characterised by the average of the warmest month being below 22 °C but above 10 °C for ≥5 months. In several areas of the central plateau, the sub-climate is classified as temperate with dry or hot summer (Csa), as it exceeds 22 °C during the summer, or cold steppe (BSk), with average annual temperatures below 18 °C. At higher altitudes in mountainous regions, the climate transitions to cold temperate, marked by average temperatures below 3 °C during the coldest months and dry summers (Dsb or Dsc) [25].
A total of 87 soil samples were collected from 29 sampling points across four provinces in Castilla y León: Salamanca (SS1–19), Valladolid (VS1–5), Zamora (ZS1–4), and Burgos (BS1) (Figure 1). Soil collection was carried out during three distinct periods, selected to reflect seasonal variation in environmental conditions: (1) September–November 2022 (t1, autumn), (2) January–February 2023 (t2, winter), and (3) May–June 2023 (t3, late spring). The same locations were sampled in each period to assess the temporal dynamics in the presence and diversity of these parasites. The evaluated samples represented a range of environments: parks (39/87), vegetable patches (18/87), riverbanks (9/87), pond edges (12/87), swamps (6/87), and beach sands (3/87). All samples were collected directly from the ground using sterile 15 mL tubes and stored at 4 °C until laboratory processing (Table 1).

2.2. Free-Living Amoebae Isolation

In total, 0.6 g of each soil sample was seeded directly onto 2% Non-Nutrient Agar (NNA) plates with a layer of heat-killed E. coli, forming a line, which were then incubated at 26 °C. The presence of amoebic cells was then assessed daily by monitoring the plates. Following the morphological characteristics using the Page key [26], plates with amoebae growth were cloned by dilution in NNA until a monoxenic culture was achieved, when possible.

2.3. DNA Extraction

DNA from positive samples was isolated from 1 to 2 millilitres of amoebic culture suspension for molecular analysis. To obtain the amoeba suspension, 4 mL of Page’s Amoeba Solution (PAS) was added to the plate with the monoxenic amoeba culture. Following the manufacturer’s instructions and the previously described method [27], the plate was scraped, the suspension was centrifuged, and the concentrated amoeba culture was directly placed into the Maxwell® 16 tissue DNA purification kit sample cartridge (Promega, Madrid, Spain). Extracted DNA yield and purity were quantified using the NanoDrop Lite Spectrophotometer.

2.4. PCR and Molecular Characterizations

PCR amplification of the 18S rRNA gene from the extracted DNA was performed using universal primers: FLA-f 5′-CGCGGTAATTCCAGCTCCAATAGC-3′/FLA-r 5′-CAGGTTAAGGTCTCGTTCGTTAAC-3′ [28] and specific primers: JDP-1f 5′-GGCCCAGATCGTTTACCGTGAA-3′ and JDP-2r 3′-TCTCACAAGCTGCTAGGGAGTCA-5′ for amoeba presenting morphology corresponding to Acanthamoeba spp. [29] and Hv1227f 5′-TTACGAGGTCAGGACACTGT-3′ [30] /VermRV 5′-TGCCTCAAACTTCCATTCGC-3′ [31] for Vermamoeba vermiformis. For the family Vahlkampfiidae we used these primers: VAHL1 5′-GTCTTCGTAGGTGAACCTGC-3′ and VAHL2 3′-CCGCTTACTGATATGCTTAA-5′ [32].
Amplification reactions were performed with a total of 50 μL of mixture, containing 80 ng of DNA, and the PCRs were carried out in 40 cycles with denaturation (95 °C, 30 s), annealing (55 °C, 30 s) and primer extension (72 °C, 30 s) for FLA universal primers. Nevertheless, for Acanthamoeba spp. and V. vermiformis primers, the 50 μL PCR mixture contained 40 ng of DNA yield and 35 cycles with denaturation (95 °C, 30 s), annealing (50 °C, 30 s), and primer extension (72 °C, 30 s). For VAHL primers, amplification reactions were performed in a 50 μL mixture containing 60 ng of DNA, and the PCRs were performed in 35 cycles with denaturation (95 °C, 60 s), annealing (55 °C, 90 s) and primer extension (72 °C, 120 s). A primer extension of 7 min at 72 °C was maintained after the last cycle. Amplification products from all PCRs were analysed by electrophoresis through a 2% agarose gel and positive PCR products were sequenced using a Macrogen Spain service. Sequence homology analysis was used to identify several species by comparing them to DNA sequences found in the Genbank database from the National Library of Medicine (NCBI).

2.5. Multiplex Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay (q-PCR)

A q-PCR reaction was performed on the samples that did not show amplification by conventional PCR, following the methodologies described by Córdoba Lanús et al. (2024) [31] and Qvarnstrom et al. (2006) [30].
The q-PCR reactions were performed in a final volume of 10 μL using 10 X TaqMan® Multiplex Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 0.5 μM of each primer, 0.25 μM of probe, and 2 μL of DNA sample. This was set up on a QuantStudio 3 real-time PCR machine (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) under the following conditions: a first step of 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles consisting of two steps of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min [30,31].
To confirm whether the Acanthamoeba spp. detected in the previous step corresponds to the T4 genotype, which accounts for more than 86% of Acanthamoeba keratitis worldwide [33], the ParoReal Acanthamoeba T4 kit (Ingenetix, GmbH, Vienna, Austria) was used. The qPCR reaction was performed on a QuantStudio 3 real-time PCR thermal cycler (ThermosFisher Scientific, MA, USA). This kit uses a FAM-labelled probe for the detection of a T4-positive genotype sample and a Cy5-labelled internal control.

2.6. Phylogenetic Analysis

The obtained sequences in this study were aligned using the software MAFFT (Version 7) with the accurate L-INS-i method [34] and trimAl for the removal of poorly aligned sites when necessary [35]. RAxML v.8.2.10 was used for phylogenetic analyses using the maximum likelihood algorithm [36]. RAxML used the GTRGAMMA substitution model for nucleotide alignments. The analysis was performed with 500 bootstrap replicates to assess the robustness of the branches. The tree was rooted with an external group.

3. Results

In this study, we monitored the environmental FLA community capable of growing at 26 °C in soil collected from four provinces of Castilla y León over the course of one year. From the total of 87 samples, all soil samples were positive for the presence of environmental FLA in NNA plates (87/87; 100%). After analysis of the 18S rRNA gene (the DF3 region in the case of Acanthamoeba), 74 soil samples (74/87; 85.05%) were positive for PCR. In addition, 7 samples (7/87; 8.04%) were q-PCR positive. All samples were found to be positive for Acanthamoeba spp. (Table S1).
Acanthamoeba spp. were the most abundantly isolated genus in soils throughout the years 2022 and 2023, with a total of 47 samples (47/87; 54.02%), with the T4 genotype being the most common (39/47; 82.98%). In contrast, the presence of V. vermiformis in 31.03% was outstanding (27/87) because it is the second most prevalent amoeba reported. Other amoebae belonging to the family Vahkampfiidae were also isolated and confirmed by conventional PCR/sanger sequencing, e.g., species of the genus Naegleria (Naegleria australiensis) or of the genus Vahlkampfia (Vahlkampfia avara).
The nucleotide sequences determined from this study were submitted to GenBank and assigned the following accession numbers: PP707062:PP707084, PP835514:PP835534, and PQ819023-PQ819044. All of them presented ˃ 95% of homology with the available DNA sequences in this database.
The results obtained show that, regarding the provinces, out of the 87 samples collected, 57 originated from Salamanca, 15 from Valladolid, 12 from Zamora, and 3 from Burgos (Figure 2).
In Salamanca, a prevalence of 100% (57/57) was obtained, with the genus Acanthamoeba predominating with 57.90% (33/57). The species V. vermiformis was present in 29.82% (17/57) and amoebae of the family Vahlkampfiidae in 7.01% (4/57). However, other FLA were identified in 5.26% (3/57). Other FLA are those amoebae that are difficult to identify by a morphological approach.
In Valladolid, a prevalence of 100% (15/15) was obtained. However, V. vermiformis was identified in more samples with 40% (6/15). The genus Acanthamoeba was isolated in 26.67% (4/15), and from the family Vahlkampfiidae, only N. australiensis was observed in 6.67% (1/15). Other FLA were also found in 26.67% (4/15).
In Zamora, a prevalence of 100% (12/12) was obtained, with the genus Acanthamoeba being the most identified, with 75% (9/12). In addition, the species V. vermiformis was observed in 16.67% (2/12) and Vahlkampfia sp. in 8.33% (1/12).
In Burgos, a prevalence of 100% (3/3) was obtained with a predominance of the species V. vermiformis with 66.67% (2/3), while the genus Acanthamoeba was identified in 33.33% (1/3).
According to the seasons, 29 samples were collected for each of the stations (t1–t3) out of the 87 samples that were distributed among the 29 sampling points (Figure 3).
In the first sampling/season (t1) a prevalence of 100% was obtained in all provinces, and a great diversity was observed with the genus Acanthamoeba in a large number of samples (17/29; 58.62%), the species V. vermiformis (6/29; 20.67%), and the amoebae of the family Vahlkampfiidae (3/29; 10.34%). Finally, other FLA were found (3/29; 10.34%).
In the second sampling/season (t2), a prevalence of 100% was obtained in all provinces. The different types of amoebae were observed, and among them, the genus Acanthamoeba (15/29; 51.72%;) and the species V. vermiformis (10/29; 34.48%) were the most abundant. In contrast, amoebae belonging to the family Vahlkampfiidae were present in 10.34% (3/29) and other FLA in a single sample (1/29; 3.44%).
In the third sampling/season (t3), a prevalence of 100% was obtained in all provinces. However, it showed a decrease in the diversity of pathogenic FLA with the genus Acanthamoeba (16/29; 55.17%) and the species V. vermiformis (11/29; 37.93%) being the most commonly identified. To a lesser extent, other FLA were observed (2/29; 6.89%), but no amoebae of the family Vahlkampfiidae were identified.
According to soil type, all environments examined—parks, vegetable patches, riverbanks, pond edges, swamps, and beach sands—showed a 100% prevalence of environmental amoebic communities (Figure 4). However, the prevalence and diversity of environmental FLA varied significantly among these different soil types, reflecting the influence of environmental conditions on amoebic communities.
The park soils were characterised by a wide diversity comprising mostly the genus Acanthamoeba (19/39; 48.71%) followed by the species V. vermiformis (13/39; 33.33%). In addition, a notable presence of the members of the family Vahlkampfiidae was observed, with a representation close to 10%, while the other FLA contributed with a similar percentage.
Vegetable patch soils presented a microbial community dominated by Acanthamoeba spp., which constituted more than 60% of the total number of environmental FLA (14/18) identified in this ecosystem. V. vermiformis accounted for 16.67% (3/18), while the family Vahlkampfiidae was only observed in one sample.
The riverbank soils showed an equal diversity between Acanthamoeba spp. and V. vermiformis representing approximately 50%. Vahlkampfia sp. was also identified (1/9; 11.11%).
Soils located at the edge of the pond are notable for the presence of Acanthamoeba spp. V. vermiformis was present in a proportion of about 20%, while the other FLA represented about 25% of the total, indicating a higher diversity compared to other soil types. The family Vahlkampfiidae was not observed in this environment.
Swamp soils were characterised by an abundance of V. vermiformis (3/6; 50%) and Acanthamoeba spp. (2/6; 33.33%). In addition, V. avara was found in a proportion close to 20%, suggesting that the environmental conditions of the swamp, characterised by high humidity, accumulation of organic matter, and low oxygen levels, favour the coexistence of these amoebae.
Sand soils presented a microbial community dominated by V. vermiformis (2/3; 66.67%), although the genus Acanthamoeba was present in 33.33% (1/3). In contrast to other soil types, neither the family Vahlkampfiidae nor other FLA were present, suggesting a lower microbial diversity compared to other ecosystems.
Overall, of all the amoebae cultivated and monitored at 26 °C, Acanthamoeba spp. was the most frequently found amoeba in all soil types, followed by V. vermiformis. The presence of family Vahlkampfiidae and other FLA varied according to the environment, being more frequent in dry soils such as parks, vegetable patches, and other samples.
The phylogenetic analysis of the 18S rRNA gene is shown in Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7.

4. Discussion

The capacity of pathogenic FLA to cause serious illnesses in humans as well as animals has led to a major rise in research on these organisms in recent years [37]. Since FLA live in warm, humid conditions (mostly soil and freshwater), an elevation in the water’s surface temperature and floods brought on by heavy rainfall may increase the incidence of pathogenic FLA infections [38]. Considering pathogenic FLA are likely to infect their human host, it is essential to monitor their presence in soil, particularly species known to pose a threat to human health. To our knowledge, the present study is the first comprehensive long-term report of the occurrence of potentially pathogenic FLA in soil from Castilla y León. By combining culture methods with molecular analyses (conventional PCR and real-time PCR), we demonstrate that each province in Castilla y León exhibits distinct diversity and a prevalence of environmental FLA. Notably, for the first time, we document the presence of pathogenic and non-pathogenic FLA across various sampling efforts conducted over a full year, as detailed in the following discussion.
Therefore, the diversity and prevalence of environmental FLA in the soils of Castilla y León varied significantly according to the soil type, province, and sampling period. Considering the kind of soil analysed, in general, Acanthamoeba spp. predominated in samples taken from parks and vegetable patches, suggesting that these environments, rich in organic matter and nutrients, provide favourable conditions for their development. They also had a significant proportion of members of the family Vahlkampfiidae. On the other hand, V. vermiformis was isolated more frequently from riverbanks and pond edges, possibly due to the greater availability of moisture in these environments. Samples from beach sand and marshes showed a lower diversity of pathogenic FLA with Acanthamoeba spp. and V. vermiformis. These distribution patterns highlight the influence of soil type and the availability of environmental resources on the composition of microbial communities.
An analysis by province revealed that, in Salamanca, a dominance of Acanthamoeba spp. was observed in most soil types, with a balanced proportion of V. vermiformis in some periods, especially in parks and vegetable patches. In Valladolid, samples from the edges of ponds and parks showed a higher diversity of environmental FLA, including significant proportions of V. vermiformis and other FLA groups. In contrast, in Zamora, Acanthamoeba spp. predominated almost exclusively in parks and vegetable patches, while in riparian areas, members of the family Vahlkampfiidae were prominent in the second sampling. Finally, in Burgos, samples were characterised by low diversity, with V. vermiformis as the only group identified in riverbanks during the first two samplings and an exclusive presence of Acanthamoeba spp. in the third sampling.
In terms of sampling periods, a fluctuation in the diversity and abundance of environmental FLA was observed. In the first sampling, carried out between September and November, a diverse environmental amoebic community was observed, with the genus Acanthamoeba being the most abundant group, although other amoebae were present in a smaller number. This could be the case since this period in 2022 was reported as a warm time compared to other years [39]. The second sampling carried out between January and February reflected a small increase in diversity, with the presence of genera such as Naegleria and Tetramitus, probably due to higher levels of humidity derived from winter precipitation. Finally, the third sampling carried out between May and June, showed a more uniform distribution of Acanthamoeba spp. and V. vermiformis, although with less representation of other groups, which could reflect a balance between increasing temperature and decreasing soil moisture.
This variability observed throughout the three sampling periods can corroborate previous studies described by Bass and Bischoff [40], which show that the abundance and diversity of FLA in the environment depend on season, temperature, humidity, rainfall, pH, and nutrient availability. Furthermore, they have pointed out that amoeba diversity can increase during transitional seasons such as autumn due to optimal combinations of temperature and humidity. However, in winter, diversity tends to be lower as only species resistant to low temperatures or able to form cysts remain active. In contrast, our research showed a small increase in diversity, with new species of FLA being recorded due to increased humidity due to winter precipitation [41]. In fact, a study conducted at a tourist resort ‘Hierve el Agua’ in Oaxaca, Mexico, found a higher number of FLA species during the rainy season compared to the dry season [42].
On the other hand, according to the Köppen classification, the autonomous community of Castilla y León represents a continental Mediterranean climate with certain sub-climates distributed throughout each province. The provinces of Salamanca, Valladolid, and Zamora have a sub-climate (Csb) characterised by mild summers that offer a favourable balance for the diversity of environmental FLA during a large part of the year, as observed above. In contrast, Burgos, with a Dfb sub-climate, highlights a more stable abundance and diversity due to the continuous availability of humidity. This suggests that V. vermifom is species were mostly present in this province for this reason.
This investigation revealed a significant prevalence of the genus Acanthamoeba, with it being the most common across the four provinces evaluated. Its high frequency in the different soil types belonging to the selected provinces could be due to its cosmopolitan character, which includes a wide range of ecological niches shared with humans, as well as the high resistance of cysts, which can survive for several years in conditions of drought and low or high temperatures, among others [43]. The identification of the T4 genotype in multiple samples, especially in parks, vegetable patches, and other recreational areas located in densely populated provinces such as Salamanca and Valladolid, highlights its great importance from a public health perspective. This genotype is the most virulent, it is associated with AK, GAE, and epithelial lesions, and its presence in environments accessible to and frequented by the general population—including children, immunocompromised individuals, and contact lens wearers—could pose a potential risk. Furthermore, it is the most frequently identified genotype in human infection and environmental samples [44,45,46,47]. The molecular assays used in this research have also allowed us to identify the T2 genotype, which has been isolated worldwide from patients with AK and has been less frequently associated with GAE [48,49,50].
The finding of other FLA, such as V. vermiformis, as well as members of the family Vahlkampfiidae, suggests a rich microbial biodiversity in this region. Notably, the genera Naegleria and Tetramitus, isolated at specific periods, belong to the same family as Naegleria fowleri, the only species that is pathogenic to humans. This suggests that it may have shared the same niche as N. fowleri. The presence of Naegleria australiensis is remarkable, as research on this species in Spain is limited, with previous reports mainly from southern regions [51]. Furthermore, the identification of Tetramitus aberdonicus expands knowledge on the previously unreported ecology of these organisms in the terrestrial environments of the Iberian Peninsula.
Regarding the methodology, the use of qPCR for samples that tested negative by conventional PCR was likely motivated by its high sensitivity and ability to detect low levels of DNA, which may be missed by conventional PCR. qPCR has a lower limit of detection (LOD), allowing for the identification of amoebae even when their abundance is minimal or DNA is degraded. For instance, qPCR can detect as little as one amoeba per sample, making it particularly effective in cases where conventional PCR fails due to low template concentrations or inhibitory substances in the sample.
The phylogenetic analysis is a fundamental tool for understanding the diversity and evolutionary relationships of environmental FLA found in soil samples. In this study, the phylogenetic tree obtained using the maximum likelihood method confirmed the genotypic assignment of the obtained sequences, reinforcing the reliability of the results obtained by conventional PCR [52,53]. The Acanthamoeba sequences consistently clustered within the T4 genotype, known for its virulence and wide environmental distribution, underscoring the health relevance of its presence in urban and agricultural soils. On the other hand, the sequences corresponding to V. vermiformis formed a clearly defined clade, consistent with its phylogenetic profile described in the literature. This reinforces its role as a potential reservoir of bacterial pathogens, given its close relationship with strains previously implicated in opportunistic infections. Finally, the Vahlkampfiidae family tree showed a distinct phylogenetic grouping, revealing species such as N. gruberi and T. aberdonicus, among others, which contributes to the understanding of their diversity in terrestrial environments.
However, this study has potential biases or study limitations that need to be considered, as the incubation temperatures used limit the isolation of the environmental amoebic community to 26 °C, excluding species such as N. fowleri that thrive at higher temperatures, for example. On the other hand, a new methodology could be employed as metagenomic sequencing offers a comprehensive approach to identify amoebae and their associated microbiomes directly from environmental DNA. This method can detect unculturable or unknown species, extending the scope of diversity analysis beyond traditional techniques.
In addition to our findings, several studies have examined the presence of environmental FLA in soil across diverse geographical regions, highlighting their global distribution and ecological significance. For instance, research conducted in Bolivia, Israel, and Guadeloupe, among others, has documented the prevalence of the FLA community in soil samples, emphasising their adaptability to various environmental conditions [54,55]. Nevertheless, compared to studies conducted in the Canary Islands and other areas of Spain, where research has mainly focused on aquatic samples, this work provides a novel perspective by evaluating soil samples and highlighting the pathogenic potential of amoebae [19,56,57,58]. Similarly to the research of Magnet et al. [23], where the presence of Acanthamoeba in water treatment plants was explored, our findings highlight the need for surveillance in different environmental settings. The soils examined in this current study are soils with high human interaction, where people, and especially children, should be made aware of the danger in soil samples from parks and orchards, for example, which they come into contact with most frequently. Public health should be made aware of the human infections that can be encountered due to contact with soil [59].

5. Conclusions

This study represents the first comprehensive analysis of the presence and diversity of environmental FLA in the soils of the autonomous community of Castilla y León, with a predominance of Acanthamoeba spp. and V. vermiformis, reflecting a rich microbial biodiversity influenced by climatic and geographical factors. The findings underline the need for the continued surveillance and public awareness of potential risks when interacting with contaminated soils, promoting a better understanding and the prevention of emerging diseases related to these amoebae.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms13051065/s1, Table S1: Additional details, results, including tables showing the presence of free-living amoebae in each of the soils from Castilla y León for three sampling.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M. and J.L.-M.; Methodology, P.P.-P., I.R.-E., E.C.-L., A.D.-d.-B. and O.G.-P.; Software, P.P.-P.; Validation, R.M. and J.L.-M.; Formal Analysis, P.P.-P.; Investigation, P.P.-P., I.R.-E., E.C.-L., A.D.-d.-B. and O.G.-P.; Resources, J.E.P., R.M. and J.L.-M.; Data Curation, P.P.-P.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, P.P.-P.; Writing—Review and Editing, R.M. and J.L.-M.; Visualisation, J.E.P., R.M. and J.L.-M.; Supervision, R.M. and J.L.-M.; Project Administration, J.E.P., R.M. and J.L.-M.; Funding Acquisition, J.E.P., R.M. and J.L.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica (CIBER) de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC); Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28006 Madrid, Spain (CB21/13/00100); Project 2022CLISA26 from Fundación Cajacanarias y Fundación Bancaria la Caixa. P.P-P. (TESIS2021010070) was funded by a grant from the Agencia Canaria de Investigación, Innovación y Sociedad de la Información de la Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento y Empleo, by Fondo Social Europeo (FSE) Programa Operativo Integrado de Canarias 2014–2020, Eje 3 Tema Prioritario 74 (85%); Cabildo Insular de Tenerife 2023–2028 (Proyecto CC20230222, CABILDO.23), and Ministerio de Sanidad, Spain.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and supplementary materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rodríguez-Zaragoza, S. Ecology of free-living amoebae. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 1994, 20, 225–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Visvesvara, G.S.; Moura, H.; Schuster, F.L. Pathogenic and opportunistic free-living amoebae: Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria fowleri, and Sappinia diploidea. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 50, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schuster, F.L.; Visvesvara, G.S. Free-living amoebae as opportunistic and non-opportunistic pathogens of humans and animals. Int. J. Parasitol. 2004, 34, 1001–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Marciano-Cabral, F.; Cabral, G. Acanthamoeba spp. as agents of disease in humans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 273–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bhosale, N.K.; Parija, S.C. Balamuthia mandrillaris: An opportunistic, free-living ameba—An updated review. Trop. Parasitol. 2021, 11, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grace, E.; Asbill, S.; Virga, K. Naegleria fowleri: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment options. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 6677–6681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Qvarnstrom, Y.; da Silva, A.J.; Schuster, F.L.; Gelman, B.B.; Visvesvara, G.S. Molecular confirmation of Sappinia pedata as a causative agent of amoebic encephalitis. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 199, 1139–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pinna, A.; Porcu, T.; Boscia, F.; Cano, A.; Erre, G.; Mattana, A. Free-Living Amoebae Keratitis. Cornea 2017, 36, 785–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aitken, D.A.; Hay, J.; Kinnear, F.B.; Kirkness, C.M.; Lee, W.R.; Seal, D.V. Amebic Keratitis in a Wearer of Disposable Contact Lenses due to a Mixed Vahlkampfia and Hartmannella Infection. Ophthalmology 1996, 103, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alexandrais, G.; Miller, D.; Huang, A.J. Amebic keratitis due to Vahlkampfia infection following corneal trauma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1998, 116, 950–951. [Google Scholar]
  11. Scheid, P.L.; Lâm, T.T.; Sinsch, U.; Balczun, C. Vermamoeba vermiformis as etiological agent of a painful ulcer close to the eye. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 1999–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Delafont, V.; Rodier, M.H.; Maisonneuve, E.; Cateau, E. Vermamoeba vermiformis: A Free-Living Amoeba of Interest. Microb. Ecol. 2018, 76, 991–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Aykur, M.; Selver, O.B.; Dagci, H.; Palamar, M. Vermamoeba vermiformis as the etiological agent in a patient with suspected non-Acanthamoeba keratitis. Parasitol. Res. 2024, 123, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Siddiqui, R.; Khan, N.A. Biology and pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba. Parasites Vectors 2012, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Samba-Louaka, A.; Delafont, V.; Rodier, M.H.; Cateau, E.; Héchard, Y. Free-living amoebae and squatters in the wild: Ecological and molecular features. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 43, 415–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mella, C.; Medina, G.; Flores-Martin, S.; Toledo, Z.; Simaluiza, R.J.; Pérez-Pérez, G.; Fernández, H. Interaction between zoonotic bacteria and free-living amoebas: A new angle of an epidemiological polyhedron of public health importance? Arch. Med. Vet. 2016, 48, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Milanez, G.D.; Carlos, K.B.; Adao, M.E.; Ayson, B.B.; Dicon, A.V.; Gahol, R.A.M.; Lacre, S.K.S.; Marquez, F.P.E.; Perez, A.J.M.; Karanis, P. Epidemiology of free-living amoebae infections in Africa: A review. Pathog. Glob. Health 2023, 117, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Ju, X.; Wang, L.; Jin, L.; Fine, R.D.; Li, M. Biological characteristics and pathogenicity of Acanthamoeba. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1147077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lorenzo-Morales, J.; Ortega-Rivas, A.; Foronda, P.; Martínez, E.; Valladares, B. Isolation and identification of pathogenic Acanthamoeba strains in Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain from water sources. Parasitol. Res. 2005, 95, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lorenzo-Morales, J.; Monteverde-Miranda, C.A.; Jiménez, C.; Tejedor, M.L.; Valladares, B.; Ortega-Rivas, A. Evaluation of Acanthamoeba isolates from environmental sources in Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2005, 12, 233–236. [Google Scholar]
  21. Reyes-Batlle, M.; Zamora-Herrera, J.; Vargas-Mesa, A.; Valerón-Tejera, M.A.; Wagner, C.; Martín-Navarro, C.M.; López-Arencibia, A.; Sifaoui, I.; Martínez-Carretero, E.; Valladares, B.; et al. Acanthamoeba genotypes T2, T4, and T11 in soil sources from El Hierro island, Canary Islands, Spain. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 2953–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Reyes-Batlle, M.; Todd, C.D.; Martín-Navarro, C.M.; López-Arencibia, A.; Cabello-Vilchez, A.M.; González, A.C.; Córdoba-Lanús, E.; Lindo, J.F.; Valladares, B.; Piñero, J.E.; et al. Isolation and characterization of Acanthamoeba strains from soil samples in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 1383–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Magnet, A.; Galván, A.L.; Fenoy, S.; Izquierdo, F.; Rueda, C.; Vadillo, C.F.; Pérez-Irezábal, J.; Bandyopadhyay, K.; Visvesvara, G.S.; da Silva, A.J.; et al. Molecular characterization of Acanthamoeba isolated in water treatment plants and comparison with clinical isolates. Parasitol. Res. 2012, 111, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Corsaro, D.; Saucedo Pages, G.; Catalan, V.; Loret, J.F.; Greub, G. Biodiversity of amoebae and amoeba-associated bacteria in water treatment plants. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2010, 213, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Agencia Estatal de Meteorología, Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente. Iberian Climate Atlas. Air Temperature and Precipitation (1971–2000); Agencia Estatal de Meteorología, Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2021.
  26. Page, F.C. Mitosis and pseudopod formation in Vexillifera bacillipedes n. sp.; A majorellid amoeba. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 1969, 88, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reyes-Batlle, M.; Wagner, C.; Zamora-Herrera, J.; Vargas-Mesa, A.; Sifaoui, I.; González, A.C.; López-Arencibia, A.; Valladares, B.; Martínez-Carretero, E.; Piñero, J.E.; et al. Isolation of thermotolerant Vermamoeba vermiformis strains from water sources in Lanzarote Island, Canary Islands, Spain. Acta Parasitol. 2016, 61, 650–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tsvetkova, N.; Schild, M.; Panaiotov, S.; Kurdova-Mintcheva, R.; Gottstein, B.; Walochnik, J.; Aspöck, H.; Lucas, M.S.; Müller, N. The identification of free-living environmental isolates of amoebae from Bulgaria. Parasitol. Res. 2004, 92, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schroeder, J.M.; Booton, G.C.; Hay, J.; Niszl, I.A.; Seal, D.V.; Markus, M.B.; Fuerst, P.A.; Byers, T.J. Use of subgenic 18S ribosomal DNA PCR and sequencing for genus and genotype identification of Acanthamoebae from humans with keratitis and from sewage sludge. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 1903–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qvarnstrom, Y.; Visvesvara, G.S.; Sriram, R.; da Silva, A.J. Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, and Naegleria fowleri. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 3589–3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Córdoba-Lanús, E.; Reyes-Batlle, M.; Domínguez-de-Barros, A.; Pérez-Pérez, P.; Rodríguez-Expósito, R.L.; García-Ramos, A.; Sifaoui, I.; García-Pérez, O.; Aneiros-Giraldez, G.; Piñero, J.E.; et al. Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay to Detect Acanthamoeba spp., Vermamoeba vermiformis, Naegleria fowleri, and Balamuthia mandrillaris in Different Water Sources. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2024, 111, 785–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. De Jonckheere, J.F.; Brown, S. The identification of vahlkampfiid amoebae by ITS sequencing. Protist 2005, 156, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Diehl, M.L.N.; Paes, J.; Rott, M.B. Genotype distribution of Acanthamoeba in keratitis: A systematic review. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 3051–3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Capella-Gutiérrez, S.; Silla-Martínez, J.M.; Gabaldón, T. trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1972–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kofman, A.; Guarner, J. Infections Caused by Free-Living Amoebae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2022, 60, e00228-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stahl, L.M.; Olson, J.B. Environmental abiotic and biotic factors affecting the distribution and abundance of Naegleria fowleri. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 97, fiaa238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Resumen Climático de Noviembre de 2022. Available online: https://www.aemet.es/es/noticias/2022/12/Resumen_clima_noviembre_2022 (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  40. Bass, P.; Bischoff, P.J. Seasonal variability in abundance and diversity of soil gymnamoebae along a short transect in southeastern USA. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2001, 48, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rodríguez-Zaragoza, S.; Marín-Morales, B.; Torres-Guzmán, J.C.; Lagunas-Martínez, A.; Rodríguez-García, A.; González-Vázquez, M.C. Primer registro de amibas de vida libre en el balneario natural “Hierve el Agua” en el municipio de San Lorenzo Albarradas, estado de Oaxaca. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2018, 89, 672–681. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rodríguez-Zaragoza, S.; Mayzlish, E.; Steinberger, Y. Vertical distribution of the free-living amoeba population in soil under desert shrubs in the Negev desert. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 2053–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bonilla-Lemus, P.; Ramírez-Bautista, G.; Zamora-Muñoz, C.; Ibarra-Montes, R.; Ramírez-Flores, E.; Hernández-Martínez, M. Acanthamoeba spp. in domestic tap water in houses of contact lens wearers in the metropolitan area of Mexico City. Exp. Parasitol. 2020, 126, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Maciver, S.K.; Asif, M.; Simmen, M.W.; Lorenzo-Morales, J. A systematic analysis of Acanthamoeba genotype frequency correlated with source and pathogenicity: T4 is confirmed as a pathogen-rich genotype. Eur. J. Protistol. 2013, 49, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Maghsood, A.H.; Sissons, J.; Rezaian, M.; Nolder, D.; Warhurst, D.; Khan, N.A. Acanthamoeba genotype T4 from the UK and Iran and isolation of the T2 genotype from clinical isolates. J. Med. Microbiol. 2005, 54, 755–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Khan, N.A. Acanthamoeba: Biology and increasing importance in human health. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 30, 564–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Behera, H.S.; Panda, A.; Satpathy, G.; Bandivadekar, P.; Vanathi, M.; Agarwal, T.; Nayak, N.; Tandon, R. Genotyping of Acanthamoeba spp. and characterization of the prevalent T4 type along with T10 and unassigned genotypes from amoebic keratitis patients in India. J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 65, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Geisen, S.; Koller, R.; Hünninghaus, M.; Dumack, K.; Urich, T.; Bonkowski, M. The soil food web revisited: Diverse and widespread mycophagous soil protists. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 94, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Otero-Ruiz, A.; Gonzalez-Zuñiga, L.D.; Rodriguez-Anaya, L.Z.; Lares-Jiménez, L.F.; Gonzalez-Galaviz, J.R.; Lares-Villa, F. Distribution and Current State of Molecular Genetic Characterization in Pathogenic Free-Living Amoebae. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Walochnik, J.; Aichelburg, A.; Assadian, O.; Steuer, A.; Visvesvara, G.; Vetter, N.; Aspöck, H. Granulomatous amoebic encephalitis caused by Acanthamoeba amoebae of genotype T2 in a human immunodeficiency virus-negative patient. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 338–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mascaró, C.; Fluviá, C.; Osuna, A.; Guevara, D. Virulent Naegleria sp. Isolated from a River in Cadiz (Spain). J. Parasitol. 1981, 67, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. King, K.M.; Van Doorslaer, K. Building (Viral) Phylogenetic Trees Using a Maximum Likelihood Approach. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2018, 51, e63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pazoki, H.; Niyyati, M.; Javanmard, E.; Lasjerdi, Z.; Spotin, A.; Mirjalali, H.; Behravan, M.R. Isolation and Phylogenetic Analysis of Free-Living Amoebae (Acanthamoeba, Naegleria, and Vermamoeba) in the Farmland Soils and Recreational Places in Iran. Acta Parasitol. 2020, 65, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Pérez-Pérez, P.; Artigas, P.; Reyes-Batlle, M.; Córdoba-Lanús, E.; Rodríguez-Expósito, R.L.; Cuervo, P.F.; Domínguez-de-Barros, A.; García-Pérez, O.; Valero, M.A.; De Elías, A.; et al. Potentially pathogenic free-living amoebae at very high altitude: Detection by multiplex qPCR in the Northern Altiplano fascioliasis hyperendemic area in Bolivia. One Health 2025, 20, 100985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Reynaud, Y.; Ducat, C.; Talarmin, A.; Marcelino, I. Cartography of Free-Living Amoebae in Soil in Guadeloupe (French West Indies) Using DNA Metabarcoding. Pathogens 2020, 9, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Reyes-Batlle, M.; Wagner, C.; López-Arencibia, A.; Sifaoui, I.; Martínez-Carretero, E.; Valladares, B.; Piñero, J.E.; Lorenzo-Morales, J. Isolation and molecular characterization of a Naegleria strain from a recreational water fountain in Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. Acta Parasitol. 2017, 62, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Reyes-Batlle, M.; Rizo-Liendo, A.; Viera-Santana, R.A.; Afonso-Morales, S.; López-Arencibia, A.; Sifaoui, I.; Chiboub, O.; Bethencourt-Estrella, C.J.; Nicolás-Hernández, D.S.; Rodríguez-Expósito, R.L.; et al. Isolation and Molecular Identification of Naegleria australiensis in Irrigation Water of Fuerteventura Island, Spain. Acta Parasitol. 2019, 64, 331–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Reyes-Batlle, M.; Díaz, F.J.; Sifaoui, I.; Rodríguez-Expósito, R.; Rizo-Liendo, A.; Piñero, J.E.; Lorenzo-Morales, J. Free living amoebae isolation in irrigation waters and soils of an insular arid agroecosystem. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 753, 141833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Aykur, M.; Dagci, H. Molecular identification of Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris and Naegleria fowleri in soil samples using quantitative real-time PCR assay in Turkey; Hidden danger in the soil! Acta Trop. 2023, 244, 106956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geographical localization of the autonomous community of Castilla y León.
Figure 1. Geographical localization of the autonomous community of Castilla y León.
Microorganisms 13 01065 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of free-living amoebae isolated in soil samples for each province.
Figure 2. Distribution of free-living amoebae isolated in soil samples for each province.
Microorganisms 13 01065 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of free-living amoebae isolated in soil samples for each season.
Figure 3. Distribution of free-living amoebae isolated in soil samples for each season.
Microorganisms 13 01065 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of free-living amoebae isolated in soil samples for types of soil.
Figure 4. Distribution of free-living amoebae isolated in soil samples for types of soil.
Microorganisms 13 01065 g004
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the genus Acanthamoeba obtained based on the 18S rRNA gene analysis (1.311 nucleotide positions), showing the position of each isolate obtained in this study that is marked within the boxes. The tree is rooted with Naegleria fowleri as the outgroup. The percentage of replicate trees, in which the associated taxa are clustered together in the bootstrap test, is shown next to the branches (in bold). Scale bar = 5.00 substitutions/site.
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the genus Acanthamoeba obtained based on the 18S rRNA gene analysis (1.311 nucleotide positions), showing the position of each isolate obtained in this study that is marked within the boxes. The tree is rooted with Naegleria fowleri as the outgroup. The percentage of replicate trees, in which the associated taxa are clustered together in the bootstrap test, is shown next to the branches (in bold). Scale bar = 5.00 substitutions/site.
Microorganisms 13 01065 g005
Figure 6. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the species Vermamoeba vermiformis obtained based on the 18S rRNA gene analysis (1.740 nucleotide positions) showing the position of each isolate obtained in this study that is marked within boxes. The tree is rooted with Naegleria fowleri as the outgroup. The percentage of replicate trees, in which the associated taxa are clustered together in the bootstrap test, is shown next to the branches (in bold). Scale bar = 0.20 substitutions/site.
Figure 6. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the species Vermamoeba vermiformis obtained based on the 18S rRNA gene analysis (1.740 nucleotide positions) showing the position of each isolate obtained in this study that is marked within boxes. The tree is rooted with Naegleria fowleri as the outgroup. The percentage of replicate trees, in which the associated taxa are clustered together in the bootstrap test, is shown next to the branches (in bold). Scale bar = 0.20 substitutions/site.
Microorganisms 13 01065 g006
Figure 7. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the family Vahlkampfiidae obtained based on the internal transcribed sequences (ITS1 and ITS2 regions) and 5.8S sequence (625 nucleotide positions), showing the position of each isolate obtained in this study that is marked within boxes. The tree is rooted with Vermamoeba vermiformis as the outgroup. The percentage of replicate trees, in which the associated taxa are clustered together in the bootstrap test, is shown next to the branches (in bold). Scale bar = 0.50 substitutions/site.
Figure 7. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the family Vahlkampfiidae obtained based on the internal transcribed sequences (ITS1 and ITS2 regions) and 5.8S sequence (625 nucleotide positions), showing the position of each isolate obtained in this study that is marked within boxes. The tree is rooted with Vermamoeba vermiformis as the outgroup. The percentage of replicate trees, in which the associated taxa are clustered together in the bootstrap test, is shown next to the branches (in bold). Scale bar = 0.50 substitutions/site.
Microorganisms 13 01065 g007
Table 1. Locations of environmental soil samples analysed for FLA detection in the autonomous community of Castilla y León.
Table 1. Locations of environmental soil samples analysed for FLA detection in the autonomous community of Castilla y León.
SampleLocalityProvinceCoordinatesSoil TypeSampling Period
SS1SalamancaSalamanca40.959703, −5.665465ParkT1–T3
SS2SalamancaSalamanca40.956167, −5.670507RiverbankT1–T3
SS3SalamancaSalamanca40.9612710, −5.6556529ParkT1–T3
SS4SalamancaSalamanca40.967759, −5.657005ParkT1–T3
SS5SalamancaSalamanca40.967934, −5.651229ParkT1–T3
SS6SalamancaSalamanca40.966007, −5.680474ParkT1–T3
SS7SalamancaSalamanca40.964590, −5.682484ParkT1–T3
SS8SalamancaSalamanca40.962817, −5.677331ParkT1–T3
SS9AldeatejadaSalamanca40.946595, −5.681442Edge of a pondT1–T3
SS10Galindo y PerahuySalamanca40.925187, −5.805347Vegetable patchT1–T3
SS11TrabancaSalamanca41.231362, −6.386124Vegetable patchT1–T3
SS12TrabancaSalamanca41.231895, −6.383861Vegetable patchT1–T3
SS13EspadañaSalamanca41.131510, −6.361370Edge of a pondT1–T3
SS14AlmendraSalamanca41.273762, −6.321856SwampT1–T3
SS15AlmendraSalamanca41.270194, −6.334739SwampT1–T3
SS16Miranda de AzánSalamanca40.888489, −5.683101ParkT1–T3
SS17Miranda de AzánSalamanca40.874163, −5.683229Edge of a pondT1–T3
SS18Miranda de AzánSalamanca40.875737, −5.683251Vegetable patchT1–T3
SS19Miranda de AzánSalamanca40.875737, −5.683251Vegetable patchT1–T3
VS1ValladolidValladolid41.657199, −4.733434Beach sandT1–T3
VS2ValladolidValladolid41.579598, −4.661287Edge of a pondT1–T3
VS3ValladolidValladolid41.657347, −4.732622ParkT1–T3
VS4ValladolidValladolid41.644965, −4.730745ParkT1–T3
VS5ValladolidValladolid41.645413, −4.729856ParkT1–T3
ZS1BenaventeZamora42.003000, −5.677081ParkT1–T3
ZS2BenaventeZamora41.995946, −5.682736ParkT1–T3
ZS3BenaventeZamora41.996640, −5.676092Vegetable patchT1–T3
ZS4ZamoraZamora41.495446, −5.754557RiverbankT1–T3
BS1BurgosBurgos42.337932, −3.705546RiverbankT1–T3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez-Pérez, P.; Rodríguez-Escolar, I.; Córdoba-Lanús, E.; Domínguez-de-Barros, A.; García-Pérez, O.; Piñero, J.E.; Morchón, R.; Lorenzo-Morales, J. Assessment of the Presence of Free-Living Amoebae in Soil Samples from the Northwest Region of Spain Using Culture and Molecular Assays. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051065

AMA Style

Pérez-Pérez P, Rodríguez-Escolar I, Córdoba-Lanús E, Domínguez-de-Barros A, García-Pérez O, Piñero JE, Morchón R, Lorenzo-Morales J. Assessment of the Presence of Free-Living Amoebae in Soil Samples from the Northwest Region of Spain Using Culture and Molecular Assays. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(5):1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051065

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pérez-Pérez, Patricia, Iván Rodríguez-Escolar, Elizabeth Córdoba-Lanús, Angélica Domínguez-de-Barros, Omar García-Pérez, José E. Piñero, Rodrigo Morchón, and Jacob Lorenzo-Morales. 2025. "Assessment of the Presence of Free-Living Amoebae in Soil Samples from the Northwest Region of Spain Using Culture and Molecular Assays" Microorganisms 13, no. 5: 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051065

APA Style

Pérez-Pérez, P., Rodríguez-Escolar, I., Córdoba-Lanús, E., Domínguez-de-Barros, A., García-Pérez, O., Piñero, J. E., Morchón, R., & Lorenzo-Morales, J. (2025). Assessment of the Presence of Free-Living Amoebae in Soil Samples from the Northwest Region of Spain Using Culture and Molecular Assays. Microorganisms, 13(5), 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051065

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop