Next Article in Journal
Differential Effects of Biogas Slurry Topdressing on Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Soil Enzyme–Microbe Interactions
Previous Article in Journal
Integrative Multi-Omics Identify Key Secondary Metabolites Linked to Acid Tolerance in Leptospirillum ferriphilum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Infectious Keratitis: A Tertiary Center’s Approach to Diagnosis, Management, and Enhanced Outcomes Through Microbiological Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical and Genomic Insights into Antifungal Resistance in Aspergillus Isolates from Thailand

by
Thanyarat Onchan
1,†,
Nattapong Langsiri
2,3,† and
Arsa Thammahong
1,*
1
Center of Excellence in Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2
Department of Transfusion Medicine and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Allied Health Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
3
Center of Excellence of Medical Mycology Diagnosis, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(11), 2495; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112495
Submission received: 17 September 2025 / Revised: 19 October 2025 / Accepted: 27 October 2025 / Published: 30 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycosis and Antifungal Agents)

Abstract

Aspergillus species are major opportunistic pathogens responsible for invasive aspergillosis, with antifungal resistance posing increasing challenges to their treatment worldwide. We investigated the antifungal susceptibility and genomic features of Aspergillus isolates from sterile clinical specimens collected at a tertiary hospital in Thailand between January and December 2023. In total, 24 isolates were identified via culture and tested for amphotericin B and voriconazole susceptibility using CLSI M38 broth microdilution, and whole-genome sequencing was performed on selected isolates to characterize resistance mechanisms. Aspergillus fumigatus was the most frequent species (54%), followed by A. flavus (29%) and other less common species. Voriconazole exhibited potent activity against most isolates, although two A. fumigatus strains showed elevated MICs (2–4 µg/mL), meeting resistance thresholds. One isolate (CUAFU23) was confirmed to harbor the cyp51A TR34/L98H mutation, marking the first identification of this canonical azole resistance mechanism in a clinical specimen from Thailand and supporting earlier environmental findings of azole-resistant A. fumigatus carrying the same allele. Genomic profiling of CUAFU23 further revealed subtle but distinct shifts in domain composition compared with susceptible strains, suggesting broader adaptive changes. The above findings underscore the emergence of azole-resistant A. fumigatus in Thailand and highlight the importance of ongoing surveillance using combined phenotypic and molecular approaches.

1. Introduction

Aspergillus species are ubiquitous environmental molds that cause a wide range of opportunistic infections in humans, collectively referred to as aspergillosis. Among them, Aspergillus fumigatus is the most common invasive pathogen, but other species, such as A. flavus, A. terreus, A. niger, and A. nidulans, are also significant etiologic agents, particularly in specific geographic regions and patient populations [1,2]. Aspergillus species can cause invasive aspergillosis [2], chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA), and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), with IA being the most severe form, associated with mortality rates of 30–60% despite antifungal treatment [3]. The World Health Organization has classified A. fumigatus as a critical priority fungal pathogen, underscoring the urgency of addressing antifungal resistance (WHO fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development, and public health action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022).
Azole antifungals, including itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole, target the ergosterol biosynthesis enzyme CYP51A and are the first-line drugs for treating and preventing aspergillosis [4]. However, azole resistance has emerged as a pressing clinical concern worldwide, linked to both medical and environmental exposures [1,2]. Resistance is commonly mediated by tandem repeats in the promoter region of cyp51A (e.g., TR34/L98H, TR46/Y121F/T289A), which promote gene overexpression, combined with amino acid substitutions that reduce azole binding affinity [1,2]. Additional mutations have been identified in cyp51B and hmg1, regulators of sterol biosynthesis, further expanding the resistance repertoire [1,2,5].
Notably, increasing numbers of azole-resistant A. fumigatus (ARAf) isolates lack cyp51A mutations entirely, particularly in Japan, suggesting alternative mechanisms of resistance [6], which may include enhanced expression of efflux transporters (e.g., cdr1B), abnormalities in mitochondrial function, and altered post-translational modifications [2,3]. Environmental and clinical surveys have revealed substantial geographic heterogeneity in the prevalence and mechanisms of azole resistance; for instance, TR-type mutants are more prevalent in Europe, while non-TR ARAf strains are increasingly reported in Asia [6].
Genomic studies have illuminated the diversity of A. fumigatus populations worldwide. In Japan, population genomics of 171 strains revealed assignment into six distinct genetic clusters, highlighting a complex evolutionary background for resistance development [6]. Importantly, approximately 43–65% of ARAf strains in some regions do not carry cyp51A mutations, underscoring the need to characterize alternative resistance pathways [6].
Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that certain azole-resistant A. fumigatus populations evolve more rapidly, due to increased mutation rates driven by defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes [3]. A specific point mutation, msh6-G233A, found almost exclusively in strains harboring the TR34/L98H allele, was shown to increase mutation rates up to fivefold without compromising fitness, enhancing the risk of developing resistance to newer antifungal medications, such as olorofim [3]. This mutator phenotype, tightly linked with resistant genotypes, poses a serious threat, as it may accelerate adaptation under antifungal pressure in both clinical and environmental contexts [3]. In summary, the emergence of genetically diverse, environmentally resilient, and mutationally dynamic ARAf strains presents a major challenge to antifungal therapy. Continued surveillance, genomic characterization, and mechanistic studies are essential to inform treatment strategies and limit the global spread of antifungal resistance. In this study, our objective is to observe antifungal resistance and mutations in Aspergillus species at a tertiary hospital in Thailand.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strains, Media, and Conditions

Aspergillus flavus ATCC 204304 and Aspergillus isolates were cultured on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA, Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) plates at 37 °C for 3–5 days until adequate conidiation was achieved. The colonies were harvested into distilled water using cell scrapers. The distilled water containing Aspergillus spores was filtered through miracloth, and the spores were counted using a hemocytometer.
Aspergillus clinical isolates, from sterile sites with proven invasive aspergillosis diagnoses, were obtained from the Mycology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, from 1 January 2023 to 31 December 2023. Patient characteristics were collected from medical records/charts. Patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA) were classified as having proven, probable, or possible invasive aspergillosis, according to EORTC/MSG criteria [7].

2.2. Broth Microdilution Assay

The CLSI broth microdilution M38 method was performed to observe the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of amphotericin B and voriconazole in A. flavus ATCC 204304 and clinical isolates [8]. The assay was performed with three biological replicates.

2.3. Sequencing Analysis

Five Aspergillus spp. isolates were subjected to whole-genome sequencing and annotation. Raw sequencing data in FAST5 format were base-called using Guppy v6.5.7-1 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK), during which both adapter and barcode sequences were trimmed, and samples were demultiplexed. Quality filtering of base-called reads was performed using Filtlong v0.3.0 (https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong, accessed on 7 June 2025), retaining only reads with a minimum q-score of 15. The identification of Aspergillus species was conducted using the EPI2ME wf-metagenomics pipeline (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, v.2.10.1). High-quality reads were used for de novo genome assembly using Flye v.2.9.5 [9], and the resulting assemblies were polished using Medaka (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK, v.1.7.3), employing corresponding reference genomes from the NCBI RefSeq database [10] for each Aspergillus species to guide error correction. The reference genomes used for polishing were A. fumigatus strain Af293 (GCF_000002655.1, downloaded on 7 June 2025) and A. flavus strain NRRL 3357 (GCF_009017415.1, downloaded on 7 June 2025). Repetitive genomic elements were identified and masked prior to annotation using RepeatMasker v4.1.5 [11]. Gene prediction and functional annotation were performed using Funannotate v.1.8.17 [12]. Ab initio gene prediction was conducted using three independent algorithms: Augustus v.3.5.0 [13], SNAP [14], and GlimmerHMM v.3.0.4 [15]. Initial training for these predictors utilized the pre-trained Ascomycota gene models from the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) pipeline [16], and final training of Augustus employed the Aspergillus fumigatus species model for improved prediction accuracy. Protein evidence was incorporated through homology-based alignment using Diamond v2.1.10 and Exonerate v.2.4.0 [17] against curated fungal protein databases. The results from ab initio predictions and protein alignments were then integrated using EvidenceModeler (EVM) v.2.1.0 [18] to generate high-confidence consensus gene models. Transfer RNA genes were predicted using tRNAscan-SE v.2.0.12 and added to the final gene annotation set. Functional annotation of predicted genes was performed using a combination of curated databases and tools. Protein function was assigned, based on homology, to UniProt, EggNOG, MEROPS (for peptidases), or CAZy (for carbohydrate-active enzymes). The 100 most abundant domains from the PFAM, MEROPS, and CAZyme families were selected to perform hierarchical clustering using scipy.cluster.hierarchy from scipy v1.16.2 modules. The row linkage (between protein domains) was determined using Euclidean distance, and column linkage (between strains) was determined using correlation distance.

2.4. Profiling the cyp51A Gene for Phylogenetic Analysis

The cyp51A sequence of each isolate was extracted using the Funannotate v.1.8.17 [12] pipeline. The promoter region, including the gene region of cyp51A, was extracted using the in-house developed pipeline. The representative sequences of the cyp51A gene were selected from the azole-resistant strain A. fumigatus (GenBank accession number OQ164735.1, AR23I strain) and the normal MIC strain (GenBank accession number AF338659.1, ATCC 36607 strain) using the GenBank database. The inspections of TR34 in the promoter and the mutation in the cyp51A gene were conducted using multiple alignment in MEGA X [19] with the representative sequence of cyp51A. The phylogenetic analysis of each region (cyp51A) of all studied isolates was conducted with MEGA XII [19] using the Maximum-Likelihood model with a bootstrap value of 1000.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All graphical charts were generated using Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Given the limited number of isolates, Pearson’s distance was applied to evaluate inter-strain variation using SciPy version 1.16.2 (Python Software Foundation).

2.6. Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 601/67, COE No. 047/2024, approved on 30 July 2024), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

3. Results

3.1. Aspergillus fumigatus Is the Most Common Isolate from Sterile Clinical Specimens

During the study period, 24 Aspergillus isolates were recovered from sterile clinical specimens (Figure 1A) and subjected to antifungal susceptibility testing (Table 1). Aspergillus fumigatus was the most frequently identified species (n = 13; 54.2%), followed by A. flavus (n = 7; 29.2%). Less common species included A. terreus (n = 2; 8.3%), A. niger (n = 1; 4.2%), and A. nidulans (n = 1; 4.2%) (Figure 1B). Tissue specimens from the lower extremities constituted the most common isolation sites, accounting for approximately one-quarter of all cases, with the remaining isolates distributed across other sterile sites (Figure 1A).

3.2. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) of Voriconazole Remain Low for Most Aspergillus Isolates

Among the 13 A. fumigatus isolates, amphotericin B MICs ranged from 1 to 8 µg/mL. A substantial proportion of isolates clustered toward the higher end of this range, with several exceeding the epidemiological cutoff value (ECV). Voriconazole MICs for A. fumigatus were generally low, with most isolates inhibited at concentrations between 0.0625 and 0.5 µg/mL. Notably, two isolates exhibited elevated voriconazole MICs of 2 and 4 µg/mL, respectively (Table 1).
For A. flavus, amphotericin B MICs ranged between 2 and 8 µg/mL, with the majority of isolates showing values at or above the ECV. In contrast, voriconazole MICs for this species remained uniformly low, ranging from 0.0625 to 0.25 µg/mL, without any evidence of elevated values (Table 1). The two A. terreus isolates displayed amphotericin B MICs of 2 and 8 µg/mL, respectively. Voriconazole activity against A. terreus was consistent, with both isolates showing MICs of 0.125 µg/mL (Table 1). The single A. niger isolate demonstrated reduced susceptibility to amphotericin B, with an MIC of 16 µg/mL. Nevertheless, voriconazole activity was preserved, with an MIC of 0.25 µg/mL (Table 1). The A. nidulans isolate exhibited an amphotericin B MIC of 4 µg/mL, while voriconazole was active at 0.125 µg/mL (Table 1).
Two Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolates were recovered from a patient with severe corneal infections who had no prior exposure to antifungal therapy; both isolates exhibited elevated voriconazole MICs (2–4 µg/mL), meeting the CLSI criteria for resistance. Consequently, one of the strains (CUAFU23) was subjected to nanopore sequencing for cyp51A mutation analysis compared to three other A. fumigatus isolates (CUAFU06, CUAFU15, and CUAFU17) as well as an A. flavus isolate (CUAFU09).

3.3. The cyp51A Gene of Strain CUAFU23 Carried the TR34/L98H Mutation

The cyp51A gene of Aspergillus fumigatus strain CUAFU23, isolated from a patient with corneal infection, was found to harbor the well-characterized TR34/L98H mutation. Sequence alignment with the wild-type reference strain confirmed the presence of both the 34 bp tandem repeat in the promoter region and the L98H amino acid substitution, demonstrating clear nucleotide and protein-level alterations at the corresponding positions (Figure 2A). Phylogenetic analysis further revealed that CUAFU23 clustered closely with strain AR23I, a previously reported azole-resistant isolate carrying the same mutation (Figure 2B). The above underscore the genetic relatedness of CUAFU23 to known resistant strains and highlight the clinical importance of the TR34/L98H mechanism in mediating azole resistance.

3.4. The cyp51A-Mutated Strain Exhibited Distinct Genomic Domain Profiles

To investigate potential genome-wide impacts associated with this mutation, we performed a clustering analysis based on the 100 most abundant protein domains across three major domain families: PFAM, MEROPS, and CAZy. The clustering results revealed a clear distinction between the genomes of A. flavus and A. fumigatus, with a Pearson’s correlation distance of 0.05, indicating significant divergence in domain composition between the two species.
More subtly, within A. fumigatus, the CUAFU23 strain exhibited a slight difference in protein domain abundance compared to other non-mutated strains. Specifically, Pearson’s correlation distance between CUAFU23 and the other A. fumigatus strains was measured, and some domains or families have a distance of more than 0.01, found across all domain families (Figure 3). A closer inspection of individual domain contributions highlighted six PFAM domains with notably different counts in CUAFU23 compared to the other strains (correlation distance > 0.01), including the Protein kinase domain (PF00069), Amino acid permease (PF00324), Condensation domain (PF00668), Variant SH3 domain (PF07653), Serine aminopeptidase S33 (PF12146), and Fibronectin type III-like domain (PF14310) (Figure 3A). Similarly, variations in MEROPS protease domains were observed. Seven domain families—C12, M12B, C48, C19, G05, I87, and S09B—showed distinct patterns of different numbers of these families in CUAFU23 (Figure 3B). The above proteases are involved in protein degradation, cellular remodeling, and virulence, suggesting that changes in proteolytic activity may accompany or result from azole resistance. In the case of CAZyme domains, seven glycoside hydrolase and glycosyltransferase families were differentially represented in CUAFU23: GH76, GH71, GT20, GT2, GT90, CE1, and GH92 (Figure 3C).

4. Discussion

In this study, using the CLSI broth microdilution method, we characterized the antifungal susceptibility profiles of 24 Aspergillus isolates from sterile clinical specimens and further investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying azole resistance in selected strains. A. fumigatus was the most prevalent species (54%), consistent with previous reports identifying it as the leading cause of invasive aspergillosis globally [1,20]; however, non-fumigatus species, including A. flavus, A. terreus, A. niger, and A. nidulans, accounted for 46% of isolates, emphasizing the importance of species-level identification, particularly in endemic regions such as Thailand, where A. flavus is frequently encountered [21,22].
Susceptibility testing demonstrated heterogeneous responses to amphotericin B and voriconazole across Aspergillus species. Two A. fumigatus isolates exhibited elevated voriconazole MICs (≥2 µg/mL), consistent with resistance as defined by CLSI breakpoints [8]. One such isolate (CUAFU23), recovered from a corneal specimen, had a voriconazole MIC of 2 µg/mL and was confirmed to harbor the TR34/L98H mutation in the cyp51A gene. This mutation represents a well-established azole resistance mechanism linked to environmental fungicide exposure and associated with clinical treatment failure [4,6].
In Thailand, reports of clinically isolated azole-resistant A. fumigatus (ARAf) remain scarce. In 2017, Tangwattanachuleeporn et al. screened 308 environmental soils in Thailand and found ARAf in 3.25% (10/308), largely due to cyp51A TR34/L98H (8/10; 80%), with the remainder due to G54R (2/10; 20%); all showed high itraconazole MICs, with occasional reduced susceptibility to posaconazole and rarely to voriconazole [23]. In 2022, Daloh et al. sampled indoor environments at Walailak University, Thailand (300 swabs), recovering 62 A. fumigatus isolates, 17/62 (27.4%) of which were azole-resistant. Among ARAf, 82% (14/17) carried hot-spot substitutions around G54, while 18% (3/17) harbored promoter tandem repeats (TR46/TR53) [24]. To our knowledge, our study provides the first evidence of a clinical A. fumigatus isolate with TR34/L98H from a corneal specimen in Thailand.
The above finding aligns with reports from Europe and Asia, where TR34/L98H is a dominant mutation in azole-resistant A. fumigatus (ARAf), particularly in regions with intensive azole fungicide use in agriculture [6,25,26,27,28]; however, the detection of only one TR-type mutant in our cohort may indicate a lower environmental pressure or different resistance dynamics in our local setting. It is worth noting that recent studies in Japan and China have documented increasing numbers of ARAf strains without cyp51A mutations, implicating alternative mechanisms such as hmg1 mutations, efflux pump overexpression, and mitochondrial alterations [5,6,27].
Interestingly, our genome-wide analysis of protein domain abundance showed subtle, yet consistent, differences in the CUAFU23 strain compared to other azole-susceptible A. fumigatus isolates. Specifically, differential abundance of PFAM domains, such as protein kinases and SH3 domains, and variation in the MEROPS and CAZy families, may suggest compensatory changes associated with azole resistance or mutator phenotypes [29,30]. Although these differences may be related to the ability of fungi to adapt to antifungal pressure, virulence modulation, or metabolic remodeling, as suggested in prior multi-omics studies of resistant A. fumigatus strains [29], it should be noted that this is still only a hypothesis, and a larger cohort should be further studied for a precise conclusion.
The presence of a TR34/L98H mutation in CUAFU23, along with subtle shifts in domain architecture, is consistent with the hypothesis that this genotype may confer a mutator phenotype. Bottery et al. recently described the msh6-G233A mutation, co-occurring with TR34/L98H, which increases mutation rates without reducing fitness, thus accelerating resistance evolution [3]. Although we did not identify msh6 variants in our strain, the observed genomic distinctions warrant further investigation into the mutational dynamics of resistant isolates in Southeast Asia.
This study has several limitations. First, it was conducted at a single tertiary center with a small number of isolates (n = 24) collected over one year, limiting generalizability and precluding temporal trend assessment. Second, antifungal susceptibility testing was restricted to amphotericin B and voriconazole, without evaluation of other triazoles (e.g., posaconazole, isavuconazole), which reduces comparability with regional and international datasets. Third, genotype–phenotype analyses were performed on only a subset of isolates, so additional resistance mechanisms (e.g., hmg1, cyp51B mutations, efflux pump upregulation) may have been missed. Finally, we did not perform longitudinal environmental surveillance or collect patient-level outcome data, preventing direct linkage between environmental and clinical isolates and limiting inference on clinical impact.
Despite these constraints, we provide the first molecular evidence of a clinical A. fumigatus isolate in Thailand harboring cyp51A TR34/L98H, underscoring the need for integrated environmental–clinical surveillance and expanded antifungal testing to define the local epidemiology of azole resistance.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we demonstrate that azole resistance in A. fumigatus exists in our clinical setting, with TR34/L98H being one of the resistance mechanisms. Genomic profiling revealed distinct features in resistant isolates, suggesting broader adaptive changes beyond cyp51A. These results underscore the importance of integrating antifungal susceptibility testing, molecular diagnostics, and genomic analysis to guide effective treatment strategies and mitigate the spread of resistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T.; Methodology, T.O., N.L. and A.T.; Validation, A.T.; Formal analysis, N.L.; Investigation, T.O. and N.L.; Resources, A.T.; Writing—original draft, T.O., N.L. and A.T.; Writing—review & editing, N.L. and A.T.; Supervision, A.T.; Project administration, A.T.; Funding acquisition, A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Ratchadapisek Sompotch Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University (grant no. RA68/011).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand (IRB No. 601/67, COE No. 047/2024, approved on 30 July 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request. The sequencing data from this research were submitted to NCBI under the BioProject accession PRJNA1289420.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Department of Microbiology and Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital for their support, including Ariya Chindamporn for her great support and guidance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lass-Florl, C. The changing face of epidemiology of invasive fungal disease in Europe. Mycoses 2009, 52, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, M.J.; Liu, H.; Barker, B.M.; Snarr, B.D.; Gravelat, F.N.; Al Abdallah, Q.; Gavino, C.; Baistrocchi, S.R.; Ostapska, H.; Xiao, T.; et al. The Fungal Exopolysaccharide Galactosaminogalactan Mediates Virulence by Enhancing Resistance to Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1005187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bottery, M.J.; van Rhijn, N.; Chown, H.; Rhodes, J.L.; Celia-Sanchez, B.N.; Brewer, M.T.; Momany, M.; Fisher, M.C.; Knight, C.G.; Bromley, M.J. Elevated mutation rates in multi-azole resistant Aspergillus fumigatus drive rapid evolution of antifungal resistance. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 10654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Patterson, T.F.; Thompson, G.R., 3rd; Denning, D.W.; Fishman, J.A.; Hadley, S.; Herbrecht, R.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Marr, K.A.; Morrison, V.A.; Nguyen, M.H.; et al. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, e1–e60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gonzalez-Jimenez, I.; Lucio, J.; Amich, J.; Cuesta, I.; Sanchez Arroyo, R.; Alcazar-Fuoli, L.; Mellado, E. A Cyp51B Mutation Contributes to Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. He, X.; Kusuya, Y.; Hagiwara, D.; Toyotome, T.; Arai, T.; Bian, C.; Nagayama, M.; Shibata, S.; Watanabe, A.; Takahashi, H. Genomic diversity of the pathogenic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus in Japan reveals the complex genomic basis of azole resistance. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. De Pauw, B.; Walsh, T.J.; Donnelly, J.P.; Stevens, D.A.; Edwards, J.E.; Calandra, T.; Pappas, P.G.; Maertens, J.; Lortholary, O.; Kauffman, C.A.; et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 1813–1821. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Approved Standard. In Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi, 3rd ed.; CLSI Document M38-A3: Wayne, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kolmogorov, M.; Yuan, J.; Lin, Y.; Pevzner, P.A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pruitt, K.D.; Tatusova, T.; Maglott, D.R. NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq): A curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (Suppl. 1), D501–D504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tarailo-Graovac, M.; Chen, N. Using RepeatMasker to Identify Repetitive Elements in Genomic Sequences. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2009, 25, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jonathan, M.; Palmer, J.S. Funannotate, v1.8.1; Eukaryotic Genome Annotation; Zenodo: Genève, Switzerland, 2020.
  13. Stanke, M.; Diekhans, M.; Baertsch, R.; Haussler, D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Johnson, A.D.; Handsaker, R.E.; Pulit, S.L.; Nizzari, M.M.; O’Donnell, C.J.; de Bakker, P.I.W. SNAP: A web-based tool for identification and annotation of proxy SNPs using HapMap. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 2938–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Majoros, W.H.; Pertea, M.; Salzberg, S.L. TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: Two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 2878–2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Buchfink, B.; Reuter, K.; Drost, H.-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 366–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haas, B.J.; Salzberg, S.L.; Zhu, W.; Pertea, M.; Allen, J.E.; Orvis, J.; White, O.; Buell, C.R.; Wortman, J.R. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 2008, 9, R7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Thompson, G.R., 3rd; Chen, S.C.; Alfouzan, W.A.; Izumikawa, K.; Colombo, A.L.; Maertens, J. A global perspective of the changing epidemiology of invasive fungal disease and real-world experience with the use of isavuconazole. Med. Mycol. 2024, 62, myae083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thammahong, A.; Thayidathara, P.; Suksawat, K.; Chindamporn, A. Invasive Aspergillus Infections in a Thai Tertiary-Care Hospital during 2006–2011. Adv. Microbiol. 2015, 05, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rudramurthy, S.M.; Paul, R.A.; Chakrabarti, A.; Mouton, J.W.; Meis, J.F. Invasive Aspergillosis by Aspergillus flavus: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Antifungal Resistance, and Management. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tangwattanachuleeporn, M.; Minarin, N.; Saichan, S.; Sermsri, P.; Mitkornburee, R.; Gross, U.; Chindamporn, A.; Bader, O. Prevalence of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in the environment of Thailand. Med. Mycol. 2017, 55, 429–435. [Google Scholar]
  24. Daloh, M.; Wisessombat, S.; Pinchai, N.; Santajit, S.; Bhoopong, P.; Soaart, A.; Chueajeen, K.; Jitlang, A.; Sama-Ae, I. High prevalence and genetic diversity of a single ancestral origin azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in indoor environments at Walailak University, Southern Thailand. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 24, 4641–4651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chowdhary, A.; Kathuria, S.; Xu, J.; Meis, J.F. Emergence of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains due to agricultural azole use creates an increasing threat to human health. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003633, Erratum in PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rocchi, S.; Daguindau, E.; Grenouillet, F.; Deconinck, E.; Bellanger, A.-P.; Garcia-Hermoso, D.; Bretagne, S.; Reboux, G.; Millon, L. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolate with the TR34/L98H mutation in both a fungicide-sprayed field and the lung of a hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient with invasive aspergillosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 1724–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gong, J.; Huang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, Y. Unveiling environmental transmission risks: Comparative analysis of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus clinical and environmental isolates from Yunnan, China. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e0159424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Swain, S.; Ajayababu, A.; Chowdhury, S.; Singh, G.; Ray, A. Epidemiology of Triazole Resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mycoses 2025, 68, e70099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hokken, M.W.J.; Coolen, J.P.M.; Steenbreker, H.; Zoll, J.; Baltussen, T.J.H.; Verweij, P.E.; Melchers, W.J.G. The Transcriptome Response to Azole Compounds in Aspergillus fumigatus Shows Differential Gene Expression across Pathways Essential for Azole Resistance and Cell Survival. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bultman, K.M.; Kowalski, C.H.; Cramer, R.A. Aspergillus fumigatus virulence through the lens of transcription factors. Med. Mycol. 2017, 55, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The distribution of clinical specimens is shown by anatomical site (A), and the distribution of Aspergillus species isolated from these specimens is shown as percentages of all isolates (B). Numbers on the graphs indicate the total count of specimens and isolates in each category.
Figure 1. The distribution of clinical specimens is shown by anatomical site (A), and the distribution of Aspergillus species isolated from these specimens is shown as percentages of all isolates (B). Numbers on the graphs indicate the total count of specimens and isolates in each category.
Microorganisms 13 02495 g001aMicroorganisms 13 02495 g001b
Figure 2. Sequence alignment confirmed the presence of the 34 bp tandem repeat (positions −322 to −289) in the promoter region and the L98H amino acid substitution in the cyp51A gene of isolate CUAFU23 compared with the wild-type reference strain (A). Phylogenetic analysis further demonstrated that CUAFU23 clustered with strain AR23I, which has previously been reported to carry the same mutation. The cyp51A gene of Aspergillus was included as an outgroup (B).
Figure 2. Sequence alignment confirmed the presence of the 34 bp tandem repeat (positions −322 to −289) in the promoter region and the L98H amino acid substitution in the cyp51A gene of isolate CUAFU23 compared with the wild-type reference strain (A). Phylogenetic analysis further demonstrated that CUAFU23 clustered with strain AR23I, which has previously been reported to carry the same mutation. The cyp51A gene of Aspergillus was included as an outgroup (B).
Microorganisms 13 02495 g002
Figure 3. Variation in functional domains were observed in A. fumigatus CUAFU23 compared with reference strains. The clinical strain of A. flavus was included as an outgroup in the analysis. (A) shows differences in PFAM domains, including the Protein kinase domain (PF00069), Amino acid permease (PF00324), Condensation domain (PF00668), Variant SH3 domain (PF07653), Serine aminopeptidase S33 (PF12146), and Fibronectin type III-like domain (PF14310). (B) illustrates variation in MEROPS protease domains, where seven domain families (C12, M12B, C48, C19, G05, I87, and S09B) displayed distinct patterns in CUAFU23, suggesting alterations in protein degradation, cellular remodeling, and virulence. (C) shows changes in CAZyme domains, where seven glycoside hydrolase and glycosyltransferase families (GH76, GH71, GT20, GT2, GT90, CE1, and GH92) were differentially represented, indicating potential shifts in cell wall remodeling and carbohydrate metabolism.
Figure 3. Variation in functional domains were observed in A. fumigatus CUAFU23 compared with reference strains. The clinical strain of A. flavus was included as an outgroup in the analysis. (A) shows differences in PFAM domains, including the Protein kinase domain (PF00069), Amino acid permease (PF00324), Condensation domain (PF00668), Variant SH3 domain (PF07653), Serine aminopeptidase S33 (PF12146), and Fibronectin type III-like domain (PF14310). (B) illustrates variation in MEROPS protease domains, where seven domain families (C12, M12B, C48, C19, G05, I87, and S09B) displayed distinct patterns in CUAFU23, suggesting alterations in protein degradation, cellular remodeling, and virulence. (C) shows changes in CAZyme domains, where seven glycoside hydrolase and glycosyltransferase families (GH76, GH71, GT20, GT2, GT90, CE1, and GH92) were differentially represented, indicating potential shifts in cell wall remodeling and carbohydrate metabolism.
Microorganisms 13 02495 g003aMicroorganisms 13 02495 g003bMicroorganisms 13 02495 g003c
Table 1. Clinical Aspergillus isolates were classified as wild-type (WT) or non-wild-type (non-WT) strains, according to the epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) defined in CLSI M57-S (2022).
Table 1. Clinical Aspergillus isolates were classified as wild-type (WT) or non-wild-type (non-WT) strains, according to the epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) defined in CLSI M57-S (2022).
Fungal Name (Total Number)/AntifungalMIC (µg/mL)MIC Range
(µg/mL)
ECV (µg/mL) (CLSI M57S, 2022)Breakpoint (µg/mL)WT (%)(N)Non-W (%)(N)
Aspergillus fumigatus (13)
Amphotericin B3.151–82-23.08% (3)76.92% (10)
Voriconazole0.690.0625–4 0.5;1;2 (2024)85% (11)15% (2)
Aspergillus flavus (7)
Amphotericin B4.862–84-14.29% (1)85.71% (6)
Voriconazole0.190.0625–0.252-100% (7)0% (0)
Aspergillus terreus (2)
Amphotericin B52–84-50% (1) 50% (1)
Voriconazole0.1250.1252-100% (2)0% (0)
Aspergillus niger (1)
Amphotericin B16162-0% (0)100% (1)
Voriconazole0.250.252-100% (1)0% (0)
Aspergillus nidulans (1)
Amphotericin B44----
Voriconazole0.1250.125----
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Onchan, T.; Langsiri, N.; Thammahong, A. Clinical and Genomic Insights into Antifungal Resistance in Aspergillus Isolates from Thailand. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2495. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112495

AMA Style

Onchan T, Langsiri N, Thammahong A. Clinical and Genomic Insights into Antifungal Resistance in Aspergillus Isolates from Thailand. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(11):2495. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112495

Chicago/Turabian Style

Onchan, Thanyarat, Nattapong Langsiri, and Arsa Thammahong. 2025. "Clinical and Genomic Insights into Antifungal Resistance in Aspergillus Isolates from Thailand" Microorganisms 13, no. 11: 2495. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112495

APA Style

Onchan, T., Langsiri, N., & Thammahong, A. (2025). Clinical and Genomic Insights into Antifungal Resistance in Aspergillus Isolates from Thailand. Microorganisms, 13(11), 2495. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112495

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop