Next Article in Journal
Correlation of Geographic Variables with the Incidence Rate of Dengue Fever in Mexico: A 38-Year Study
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Immunological Responses of Adult Domestic and Bighorn Sheep to Inoculation with Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae Type Strain Y98
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Analysis of Innate Immune Responses and the Structural Characterization of Spike from SARS-CoV-2 Gamma Variants and Subvariants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Trypanosoma cruzi DNA Identification in Breast Milk from Mexican Women with Chagas Disease

by
María del Pilar Crisóstomo-Vázquez
1,
Griselda Rodríguez-Martínez
2,
Verónica Jiménez-Rojas
2,
Leticia Eligio-García
2,
Alfonso Reyes-López
3,
María Hernández-Ramírez
4,
Francisco Hernández-Juárez
5,
José Luis Romero-Zamora
6,
Silvia Guadalupe Vivanco-Tellez
7,
Fortino Solorzano-Santos
7,
Victor M. Luna-Pineda
2,* and
Guillermina Campos-Valdez
2,*
1
Laboratorio de Investigación en Parasitología, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Ciudad de México 06720, Mexico
2
Laboratorio de Investigación en Patógenos Respiratorios y Producción de Biológicos, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Ciudad de México 06720, Mexico
3
Centro de Estudios Económicos y Sociales en Salud, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Ciudad de México 06720, Mexico
4
Hospital General de Santa María Huatulco, Santa María Huatulco 70980, Oaxaca, Mexico
5
Hospital Comunitario “Dr. Pedro Espinosa Rueda”, Pinotepa Nacional 71600, Oaxaca, Mexico
6
Departamento de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Ciudad de México 06720, Mexico
7
Unidad de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Ciudad de México 06720, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(12), 2660; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122660
Submission received: 6 November 2024 / Revised: 25 November 2024 / Accepted: 27 November 2024 / Published: 21 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Parasitic Infection and Host Immunity, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Chagas disease is a public health problem affecting nearly 2 million women of reproductive age in Latin America. From these, 4–8% can transmit the infection to the foetus through the vertical route, whereas horizontal transmission through milk during breastfeeding remains controversial. Therefore, the presence of Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) DNA in the milk of women seropositive for Chagas disease was analysed to determine whether a relationship with the infection of their children can exist. (2) Methods: 260 pairs (mother–child) from four hospitals located in rural areas endemic to T. cruzi (state of Oaxaca) were studied. The presence of anti-T. cruzi antibodies in the serum of lactating women were determined by ELISA, whereas parasitic DNA in either breast milk or newborn’s blood was identified by PCR; (3) Results: The seroprevalence of infection in lactating women was 5.76%, and the frequency of infection detected by PCR in breast milk was 1.92%, while the frequency of infection in the blood of newborns was 1.92%. Pochutla-Oaxaca presented the highest number of positive cases in both breast milk and blood. The only risk factor found was the presence of the vector in the geographical area analysed, favouring the parasite’s transmission. Overall, the results suggest a probable transmission of T. cruzi, although whether it was through breastfeeding or through the blood during delivery could not be determined. (4) Conclusions: T. cruzi DNA was identified in lactating women’s milk and newborn blood, which is probable evidence of transmission through breastfeeding; nevertheless, future studies must be performed to confirm the presence of the parasite, alive or dead.

1. Introduction

Chagas disease is caused by the hemoflagellate protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi). The parasite is vectorially transmitted to humans by the hematophagous insect of the generous Triatoma [1]. This neglected tropical disease affects about 8 million people in Latin America and causes losses of US$1.2 billion annually [2,3]. Due to the constant population migration from Central America, South America, and Mexico endemic areas, Chagas disease is also found in non-endemic countries such as the United States, Spain, and Portugal. For instance, Gascon et al. reported that among the immigrant population in Spain, Bolivian immigrants showed the highest T. cruzi prevalence (6.75%) [4]. Thus, the appearance of the disease has been reported to be due to a non-vector transmission (congenital or blood transmission) from infected immigrants [4], generating concern in developing countries with higher migration rates.
Mexico is one of the main endemic countries, possessing 39 documented Triatoma species, with at least 21 of them reported to be infected by T. cruzi [5]. Since two-thirds of the Mexican territory is considered at risk for transmission through the vector, the number of cases of Chagas disease is estimated to be 1.1 million people infected in Mexico annually, with an incidence of 0.80 per 100,000 population [6,7]. The states of Veracruz, Chiapas, Quintana Roo, Oaxaca, Morelos and Yucatán have recorded the highest incidence rates in Mexico [8,9].
As T. cruzi is carried in the faeces of infected triatomine, infection occurs when the vector bites an exposed area of human skin or mucous membranes, and immediately after feeding, it defecates near the bite, allowing the passage of the parasite. Thus, the parasite enters the bloodstream through the skin, facilitated by self-inflicted scratching and proteolytic enzymes in the triatomine’s saliva [10]. Moreover, non-vectorial transmission routes in the infected population include blood transfusion, vertical transmission from an infected pregnant woman to her foetus, organ transplants, and the ingestion of food contaminated with the parasite [11]. In infected pregnant women, the parasite can infect the foetus by crossing the placental barrier, resulting in congenital Chagas disease in approximately 20–30% of infected infants [12]. Therefore, it has been proposed both prevention in girls, female adolescents, and women of fertile age and antenatal screening for infection in pregnant women are efficient preventive measures in controlling congenital transmission of T. cruzi [13].
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends conventional serological tests, such as indirect hemagglutination assay, indirect immunofluorescence assay, or Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA), based on crude or recombinant antigens as diagnostic tests in Chagas disease [14]. In Mexico, the Chagas prevalence in pregnant women is 3%, whereas the vertical transmission rate is 8% [15]. Detection of antibodies (Ab) against T. cruzi in serum is currently used to diagnose Chagas disease in pregnant women. In contrast, determining the presence of parasites in blood by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is recommended in newborns [14]. Hence, several studies in Latin America have focused on determining the seroprevalence in pregnant women and congenital transmission of T. cruzi [16,17,18]. In a previous prospective study of a transversal cohort of samples obtained from Oaxaca, Mexico City, and Jalisco, a seroprevalence of infection in pregnant women of 4.12–12.02% was found, whereas the congenital transmission rate was 1.5–9.1% [17].
The data regarding the horizontal transmission route of T. cruzi infection are controversial. For instance, in previous works, T. cruzi trypomastigotes were localised in milk from female mice without blood contamination [19]. Still, in humans, the transmission of trypomastigotes in infected mothers’ milk to newborns through lactation was conflicting as the authors emphasised that the collected milk was contaminated by blood and, therefore, could be responsible for the horizontal transmission route through milk [20,21]. On the other hand, human milk samples infected with T. cruzi trypomastigotes were able to generate infection when orally inoculated to mice [22].
Despite oral transmission through human milk contaminated with trypomastigotes is possible, natural transmission through breastfeeding has not been fully demonstrated in Chagas disease [23]. Since breast milk is the newborns’ only food source containing essential nutritional and immunological development elements during the first year of life, this study aimed to determine whether the presence of T. cruzi in the milk of lactating women seropositive for Chagas disease could be responsible for the infection in newborns.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population and Ethical Statement

The state of Oaxaca, Mexico, is an endemic area to the Rhodnius prolixus, Triatoma barberi, and T. bolívar vectors. This study was conducted from October 2019 to November 2021. It included mother–child pairs in the breastfeeding stage from four hospitals in Oaxaca: The Hospital General (HG) de San Pedro Pochutla, Centro de Salud con Servicios Ampliados (CESSA) in Santa Cruz Huatulco, Hospital Comunitario (HC) de Santa María Huatulco, and HC “Dr. Pedro Espinosa Rueda” in Santiago Pinotepa Nacional (Supplementary Figure S1). The sample size was calculated considering the number of births attended per year in each hospital and the reported prevalence of the vertical Chagas transmission route [17].
The women were given a questionnaire to obtain general data: name, age, address, place of birth and origin. Moreover, to determine possible risk factors, the following epidemiological and obstetric information was considered: knowledge of the transmitting vector, presence of the transmitting vector in their home, number of blood transfusions received, number of pregnancies, resolution of pregnancies and weeks of gestation by date of last menstrual period. The newborn data included the anthropometric data: date of birth, sex, age (determined by the Capurro method), pregnancy resolution, the Apgar score (colour, heart rate, reflexes, muscle tone, and respiration), somatometry data (weight, height and head circumference), and presence of liver, heart and/or digestive disorders.
For breast milk sample obtention, 260 women were asked to provide approximately 5 mL of breast milk. Each breast milk sample was mixed with the nucleic acid preservation reagent (DNA/RNA Shield, Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) to transport the sample at room temperature to avoid nucleic acid damage, degradation or contamination. In addition, 5 mL of blood was taken by venipuncture and placed in a vacutainer tube (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) to obtain serum. Regarding 261 newborns (one twin), a drop of blood was taken by heel prick and put on sterile filter paper. As negative controls, 30 breastfeeding women seronegative to T. cruzi and their newborns were also included.
The project was reviewed and approved by the Research Committee, Ethics Committee, and Biosecurity Committee from HIMFG with grant number HIM/2018/095 SSA 1533. The work was carried out following the international guidelines of the Helsinki postulates. Blood samples were collected according to the ethics and biosafety protocols published in the laboratory’s standardised guidelines. Since the general health law regulations on research state that sampling by either middle finger puncture or venipuncture is considered a minimal-risk procedure, informed consent was obtained from each participant.

2.2. Anti-T. cruzi Antibodies by Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

The Chagas IgG ELISA kit with total T. cruzi antigen (DGR ELISA; 96% sensibility and 97% specificity) and the recombinant antigen MicroELISA (ACCUTRACK CHAGAS; 99.5% sensibility and 99.2% specificity) were performed to evaluate anti-T. cruzi IgG in the serum of lactating women. The procedures were performed following the specifications of the suppliers. A positive test was considered when the optical density of the analysed samples was more significant than the value of the cohort points for each kit, with optical density (OD) values higher than 0.167 and 0.162, respectively [24].

2.3. T. cruzi-Specific GAPDH Gene by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

T. cruzi in breast milk and newborn blood was identified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Briefly, DNA was extracted from 1 mL of breast milk using the Food DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen, Thorold, ON, Canada), while the DNA from the drop of whole blood on filter paper was extracted using the Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research), following the recommendations of both suppliers.
Since GAPDH is an essential enzyme in the glycolytic pathway that controls the parasite’s energy production and is a target of antiparasitic compounds, the amplification primer sequence was obtained from Arrollo-Olarte et al. with the following sequences: GAPDH-F (5′-AGCATACAGGAGATCGACGC-3′) and GAPDH-R (5′-CGTAAATGGAGCTGCGGTTG-3′) [25]. The reaction mixture was prepared with 12.5 μL of Dream Taq Green PCR master mix (2×), 1 μL of the forward primer (50 nM), 1 μL of the reverse primer (50 nM), 5 μL of DNA (100 ng) and at to 25 μL of nuclease-free water as final volume. The amplification program included (1) one cycle of denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, (2) 35 cycles of denaturation, annealing and extension at 95 °C for 30 s, 58° for 30 s and 72° for 30 s, (3) a final cycle at 72 °C for one minute. This PCR reaction was performed in an Invitrogen MiniAmp thermocycler. The controls included T. cruzi strain Tulahuen (ATCC 30266) as positive control and confirmed human DNA without Chagas disease as negative control, whereas PCR mix without DNA template was a reaction control. The amplificons were run by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel, stained with SYBR safe (DNA gel stain from Invitrogen) and visualised on iBright Imaging System (CL 1000, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The ELISA and PCR results and clinical data analysis were used to calculate the relative and absolute frequencies from all the categorical variables, including all variables’ absolute and relative frequencies since they were categorical. The association between the variables and the results obtained was evaluated using tests of differences in proportions for qualitative data and medians for quantitative data with Pearson’s χ2 and Fisher exact tests, using an α level of 5% as a cut-off point to determine statistically significant results (p < 0.05). All procedures were analysed with the STATA statistical package, version 18.

3. Results

Two hundred and sixty mother–child pairs from the state of Oaxaca participated in this study. From these, 70 (26.92%) were from the CESSA, 70 (26.92%) from the HG-San Pedro Pochutla, and 69 (26.4%) from the HG-Dr. Pedro Espinosa Rueda, and 51 (19.62%) from the HC-Santa María Huatulco. The average age of the participating women was 24.76 ± 6.49 years. Of the total women, 36.15% were primigravida, 63.85% were multigravida, 50.76% had a caesarean, 12.68% had a miscarriage, and none had any death birth. Regarding characteristics of the newborns, 47.69% were female, the mean gestational age was 38.84 ± 2.18 weeks, the mean APGAR at 1 min was 8.13 ± 1.31, and the APGAR at 5 min was 8.96 ± 0.45, the weight was 3111.24 ± 548.91 g, the size was 49.32 ± 3.13 cm, and the head circumference was 34.71 ± 3.60 cm.

3.1. Positivity Frequency from Blood PCR and Maternal Seropositivity

From the total mother–child pairs (each mother with her respective child; N = 260), only 19 pairs (7.3%) were positive by ELISA, PCR or both tests and considered positive for either Chagas infection or the presence of T. cruzi DNA. Of these, six (31.59%) were from the HG-San Pedro Pochutla and five (26.31%) from the HG-Dr Pedro Espinosa Rueda, five (26.31%) were from the CESSA, three (15.79%) were from the HC-Santa María Huatulco. On the other hand, only fifteen women (78.94%) were positive for anti-T. cruzi IgG antibodies and five positives (26.31%) in breast milk for PCR, who were asymptomatic to Chagas disease. From the mothers with T. cruzi-positive breast milk, their newborns (n = 5) were identified with T. cruzi DNA by blood PCR. Interestingly, only one mother–child pair was positive for both ELISA and PCR tests (Table 1). Regarding the results obtained with the PCR test in milk from lactating women and in blood from newborns from the four hospitals studied, a highly significant association (p < 0.005) was observed between PCR positivity in milk and PCR positivity in newborns’ blood.

3.2. Relationship Between Women with Chagas Disease and Clinical Obstetric Data

The women with Chagas disease showed no association between infection with T. cruzi and the parameters studied as indicators of vertical transmission: primiparous women, multiple pregnancies, caesarean births, abortions, premature births (weeks of gestation) and the hospital of origin. Regarding the age of the women, a higher proportion was found in the groups 18 to 24 and 25 to 34 years old in women with positive serology for T. cruzi (40 to 50%). Interestingly, a significant association was observed in women with ≥25 years from HG-San Pedro Pochutla (Table 2).
Noteworthily, the prevalence of maternal positivity to PCR was 1.92%, and the hospital with the highest number of positive cases in women and children was HG-San Pedro Pochutla (2.89%). However, no statistical significance was obtained between the results of the PCR tests in breast milk and the clinical obstetric data in the four hospitals (Table 3).

3.3. Relationship Between Newborns with Chagas Disease and Somatometry Data

Infants born from women with positive serology and PCR for T. cruzi did not show an association between infection and the parameters considered indicators of infection acquired through the vertical route. Anthropometric data at birth of infants positive for T. cruzi by PCR was within normal values (Table 4). Since no associations between PCR-positive and PCR-negative infants were observed, it was suggested that infants with suspected T. cruzi infection were asymptomatic. Therefore, based on the laboratory results, it can be suggested that there was only suspicion of infection.
Of the fifteen women with a positive ELISA test, only one was positive for PCR and the PCR of her child (Table 1). This case is the most interesting to our purpose because it is likely that the infant could have been infected by its mother. Still, whether this infection occurred by breast milk or the vertical transmission route cannot be determined. Despite the PCR test in milk identifying the T. cruzi DNA, it is impossible to determine whether the parasite is alive or dead with this test. Thus, the determination of T. cruzi DNA in the newborns will be essential to demonstrate the presence of the infection in this mother–child pair.

4. Discussion

Breastfeeding as a transmission mechanism for T. cruzi infection has not been well described. Although several works describing the presence of the parasite in breast milk have been reported, some authors report their absence, leading to the conclusion that this transmission route remains controversial [23]. The first studies on the transmission of Chagas disease through breastfeeding were observational and were carried out on experimentally infected mice and rats [26]. Information regarding T. cruzi transmission through breastfeeding is scarce in humans and presents contrasting results. For example, in 1936, Mazza and collaborators carried out the first human studies, finding trypomastigotes in the milk of women in the acute phase of Chagas disease. However, it could not be demonstrated that the transmission was through breastfeeding since the milk of some women was contaminated with blood from cracked nipples [27]. In contrast, in a work by Bittencourt et al. conducted on 78 Chagasic mothers, no T. cruzi parasite in colostrum or milk could be found in either the women or the nursing children [27]. The results obtained in this study demonstrated the presence of the parasite’s DNA in the milk of women who were reactive to serological tests and the presence of DNA in the blood of their nursing children; however, it was not possible to identify the transmission route, whether it was through breastfeeding, through infection with blood from the nipple or during childbirth. Animal models could help demonstrate breastfeeding as a transmission route for T. cruzi infection.
The state of Oaxaca is one of the Mexican regions with the highest risk of contracting T. cruzi [8]. In this study, we observed an increase in the number of cases in San Pedro Pochutla, a region located north of Oaxaca; since this region lacks control programs for triatomine bugs, the vector transmission is likely active in this geographic area, contributing to the dissemination of the parasite. The high prevalence of lactating women infected with T. cruzi highlights the need to implement diagnostic strategies to identify asymptomatic infected women attending hospitals or maternity wards, and thus can be treated during and after their pregnancies to avoid transmission to their children. Interestingly, a case of a mother–child pair, both positive by PCR and serological tests, was identified in the Pochutla hospital. In this case, transmission through breastfeeding could be suggested; however, as the sample could not be used to either isolate the parasite in culture media or to observe its presence by microscopy, no definitive conclusion can be made. Another plausible explanation is that the DNA present in the blood of the newborns is due to the opsonising capacity of the mother’s anti-T. cruzi antibodies. Carlier et al. reported that infected pregnant women can transmit the antibodies against the parasite to the foetus. In turn, the antibodies, when opsonising parasites, can promote phagocytosis and thus the destruction of T. cruzi by cells expressing FcγR provided that these cells are sufficiently activated in an inflammatory context, as opposed to what occurs in infected pregnant women who transmit the parasite to their newborns through the vertical route [28].
The presence of T. cruzi DNA in newborns from infected women was identified in this work. Unfortunately, the transmission through the ingestion of milk from infected women could not be demonstrated since the presence of the live parasite was not identified. A work by Perinetti et al. showed that in female mice infected with trypomastigotes of the Y strain of T. cruzi, only a few trypomastigotes were ingested by the offspring. The low trypomastigotes ingested with the mother’s antibodies were responsible for the parasite’s lack of transmission to the mouse pups [19]. The work results showed that the women who were reactive by serology were 20 to 30 years old, and all were asymptomatic. These data are in agreement with recent works reporting that the age with the highest prevalence of Chagas disease in women is 20 years, mainly in areas of high endemicity. This finding highlights the need to carry out parasitological and serological monitoring of women infected with the parasite, especially when pregnant, to carry out effective strategies to prevent transmission before and after delivery to the offspring and during lactation. Identifying the mother–child binomial infected with T. cruzi is essential for developing strategies that prevent transmission to the infant without affecting their development and feeding.

5. Conclusions

In this study, T. cruzi DNA was identified in lactating women’s milk, but only in one of these mother–child pairs did the mother have anti-T. cruzi IgG antibodies. Her corresponding newborn was also positive for T. cruzi DNA, suggesting circulating parasites could be present in colostrum. Nevertheless, several mothers had anti-T. cruzi IgG antibodies, but T. cruzi DNA was not identified in breast milk and newborns’ blood; probably, the antibodies are immunological memory, or very few parasites were circulating in their blood. Future studies must be performed to confirm the presence of the parasite, alive or dead.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms12122660/s1, Figure S1: Localisation of four regional hospitals in the state of Oaxaca.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, G.C.-V.; methodology, M.d.P.C.-V. and L.E.-G.; software, A.R.-L.; validation, G.C.-V., M.d.P.C.-V. and V.J.-R.; formal analysis, A.R.-L.; investigation, S.G.V.-T.; resources, M.H.-R.; data curation, F.H.-J.; writing—original draft preparation, V.M.L.-P. and G.R.-M.; writing—review and editing, V.M.L.-P. and G.R.-M.; visualisation, J.L.R.-Z.; supervision, F.S.-S.; project administration, G.C.-V.; funding acquisition, G.C.-V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Federal Funds from the HIMFG, grant number HIM/2018/095 SSA 1533 (G.C.-V.) funded this research.

Data Availability Statement

The corresponding author (G.C.-V.) can provide informed consent and clinical demographic datasets from the population upon reasonable request. All data were anonymised before analysis.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Research Unit in Infectious Diseases, for making the development of this research project possible. We thank Dioselin García Ruíz and Fabian Hernández Trujillo for the collection of data from mothers and their children, as well as the taking of milk, blood and serum samples. We thank the Hospital General of San Pedro Pochutla, Centro de Salud con Servicios Ampliados (CESSA) in Santa Cruz Huatulco, Hospital Comunitario of Santa María Huatulco, and Hospital Comunitario “Pedro Espinosa Rueda” in Santiago Pinotepa Nacional for the support provided in the search for the women and their children included in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bern, C. Chagas’ Disease. Available online: https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMra1410150 (accessed on 22 August 2024).
  2. Rassi, A.; Rassi, A.; Marin-Neto, J.A. Chagas Disease. Lancet 2010, 375, 1388–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hotez, P.J.; Bottazzi, M.E.; Franco-Paredes, C.; Ault, S.K.; Periago, M.R. The Neglected Tropical Diseases of Latin America and the Caribbean: A Review of Disease Burden and Distribution and a Roadmap for Control and Elimination. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2008, 2, e300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gascon, J.; Bern, C.; Pinazo, M.-J. Chagas Disease in Spain, the United States and Other Non-Endemic Countries. Acta Trop. 2010, 115, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bargues, M.D.; Klisiowicz, D.R.; Gonzalez-Candelas, F.; Ramsey, J.M.; Monroy, C.; Ponce, C.; Salazar-Schettino, P.M.; Panzera, F.; Abad-Franch, F.; Sousa, O.E.; et al. Phylogeography and Genetic Variation of Triatoma Dimidiata, the Main Chagas Disease Vector in Central America, and Its Position within the Genus Triatoma. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2008, 2, e233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rojo-Medina, J.; Ruiz-Matus, C.; Salazar-Schettino, P.M.; González-Roldán, J.F. Enfermedad de Chagas en México. Gac. Med. Mex. 2018, 154, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chagas Disease in Latin America: An Epidemiological Update Based on 2010 Estimates. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 2015, 90, 33–43.
  8. Carabarin-Lima, A.; González-Vázquez, M.C.; Rodríguez-Morales, O.; Baylón-Pacheco, L.; Rosales-Encina, J.L.; Reyes-López, P.A.; Arce-Fonseca, M. Chagas Disease (American Trypanosomiasis) in Mexico: An Update. Acta Trop. 2013, 127, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ibáñez-Cervantes, G.; León-García, G.; Castro-Escarpulli, G.; Mancilla-Ramírez, J.; Victoria-Acosta, G.; Cureño-Díaz, M.A.; Sosa-Hernández, O.; Bello-López, J.M. Evolution of Incidence and Geographical Distribution of Chagas Disease in Mexico during a Decade (2007–2016). Epidemiol. Infect. 2018, 147, e41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Amino, R.; Martins, R.M.; Procopio, J.; Hirata, I.Y.; Juliano, M.A.; Schenkman, S. Trialysin, a Novel Pore-Forming Protein from Saliva of Hematophagous Insects Activated by Limited Proteolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 6207–6213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schmuñis, G.A. Trypanosoma Cruzi, the Etiologic Agent of Chagas’ Disease: Status in the Blood Supply in Endemic and Nonendemic Countries. Transfusion 1991, 31, 547–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kemmerling, U.; Bosco, C.; Galanti, N. Infection and Invasion Mechanisms of Trypanosoma Cruzi in the Congenital Transmission of Chagas’ Disease: A Proposal. Biol. Res. 2010, 43, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Carlier, Y.; Altcheh, J.; Angheben, A.; Freilij, H.; Luquetti, A.O.; Schijman, A.G.; Segovia, M.; Wagner, N.; Albajar Vinas, P. Congenital Chagas Disease: Updated Recommendations for Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-up of Newborns and Siblings, Girls, Women of Childbearing Age, and Pregnant Women. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Abras, A.; Muñoz, C.; Ballart, C.; Berenguer, P.; Llovet, T.; Herrero, M.; Tebar, S.; Pinazo, M.-J.; Posada, E.; Martí, C.; et al. Towards a New Strategy for Diagnosis of Congenital Trypanosoma Cruzi Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 1396–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Santana, K.H.; Oliveira, L.G.R.; Barros de Castro, D.; Pereira, M. Epidemiology of Chagas Disease in Pregnant Women and Congenital Transmission of Trypanosoma Cruzi in the Americas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2020, 25, 752–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lynn, M.K.; Rodriguez Aquino, M.S.; Cornejo Rivas, P.M.; Kanyangarara, M.; Self, S.C.W.; Campbell, B.A.; Nolan, M.S. Chagas Disease Maternal Seroprevalence and Maternal-Fetal Health Outcomes in a Parturition Cohort in Western El Salvador. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cardoso, E.J.; Valdéz, G.C.; Campos, A.C.; de la Luz Sanchez, R.; Mendoza, C.R.; Hernández, A.P.; Ramírez, M.H.; Habana, J.R.; González, E.B.; Matzumura, P.D.; et al. Maternal Fetal Transmission of Trypanosoma Cruzi: A Problem of Public Health Little Studied in Mexico. Exp. Parasitol. 2012, 131, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Salas Clavijo, N.A.; Postigo, J.R.; Schneider, D.; Santalla, J.A.; Brutus, L.; Chippaux, J.-P. Prevalence of Chagas Disease in Pregnant Women and Incidence of Congenital Transmission in Santa Cruz de La Sierra, Bolivia. Acta Trop. 2012, 124, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Martins, L.P.A.; Castanho, R.E.P.; Nogueira, A.B.; da Silva, O.T.; Gusmão, A.S. de Incidence of Trypanosoma Cruzi Transmission through Breastfeeding during Acute Experimental Chagas Disease. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 15, 116–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jörg, M.E. The transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi via human milk. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 1992, 25, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mazza, S.; Montaña, A.; Benitez, C.; Janzi, E.Z. Transmisión de Schizotrypanum Cruzi al Niño Por Leche de La Madre Con Enfermedad de Chagas. Mis. Est. Patol. Reg. Arg. 1936, 28, 6. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferreira, C.S.; Amato Neto, V.; Gakiyai, E.; Bezerra, R.C.; Rodríguez Alarcón, R.S. Microwave Treatment of Human Milk to Prevent Transmission of Chagas Disease. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2003, 45, 41–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Norman, F.F.; López-Vélez, R. Chagas Disease and Breast-Feeding. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 1561–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Campos-Valdez, G.; Canseco-Ávila, L.M.; González-Noriega, F.; Alfaro-Zebadua, O.; Nava-Medecigo, I.Y.; Jiménez-Cardoso, E. Maternal-fetal transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi, a health problem slightly studied in Mexico: Case Chiapas. Salud Publica Mex. 2016, 58, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Arroyo-Olarte, R.D.; Martínez, I.; Cruz-Rivera, M.; Mendlovic, F.; Espinoza, B. Complement System Contributes to Modulate the Infectivity of Susceptible TcI Strains of Trypanosoma Cruzi. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2018, 113, e170332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moreno, E.A.; Rivera, I.M.; Moreno, S.C.; Alarcón, M.E.; Lugo-Yarbuh, A. Vertical transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in Wistar rats during the acute phase of infection. Invest. Clin. 2003, 44, 241–254. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bittencourt, A.L.; Sadigursky, M.; Da Silva, A.A.; Menezes, C.A.; Marianetti, M.M.; Guerra, S.C.; Sherlock, I. Evaluation of Chagas’ Disease Transmission through Breast-Feeding. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1988, 83, 37–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carlier, Y.; Truyens, C.; Muraille, E. Is Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Trypanosoma Cruzi Infection Contributing to Congenital/Neonatal Chagas Disease? Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 723516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Number of patients positive for PCR or ELISA tests.
Table 1. Number of patients positive for PCR or ELISA tests.
CESSAHospital Santa Maria HuatulcoHospital de San Pedro PochutlaHospital General “Dr. Pedro Espinosa Rueda”
P1P2P3P4P5P6P7P8P9P10P11P12P13P14P15P16P17P18P19
AGE18171841241634252743411928233618272228
GESTATIONS2115213218234131112
ABORTIONS0002000000100000000
ELISA+++++++++++++++
PCR IN BREAST MILK+++++
PCR IN NEWBORN’S BLOOD+++++
CESSA, Centro de Salud con Servicios Ampliados; ELISA, Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
Table 2. Relationship between positive maternal serology and clinical obstetric data.
Table 2. Relationship between positive maternal serology and clinical obstetric data.
CESSAHospital Santa Maria HuatulcoHospital de San Pedro PochutlaHospital General “Dr. Pedro Espinosa Rueda”
AGE (YEARS)p = 0.140p = 1.000p = 0.034p = 0.455
<1825% (1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
18–2450% (2)50% (1)20% (1)25% (1)
25–340 (0)50% (1)40% (2)50% (2)
35–4425% (1)0 (0)40% (2)25% (1)
PRIMIGRAVIDAp = 0.593p = 0.534p = 1.000p = 1.000
(n/N = %)50% (2/4)040% (2/5)50% (2/4)
MULTIGRAVIDAp = 0.593p = 0.534p = 1.000p = 1.000
(n/N = %)50% (2/4)100% (2/2)60% (3/5)50% (2/4)
CESAREANp = 1.000p = 0.235p = 1.000p = 0.33
(n/N = %)50% (2/4)100% (2/2)60% (3/5)25% (1/4)
GESTATION WEEKSp = 0.385p = 1.000p = 1.000p = 0.484
<3825% (1/4)000
38 to 4075% (3/4)100% (2/2)100% (5/5)75% (3/4)
>4000025% (1/4)
Table 3. Relationship between positive PCR in breast milk and clinical obstetric data.
Table 3. Relationship between positive PCR in breast milk and clinical obstetric data.
CESSAHospital Santa Maria HuatulcoHospital de San Pedro PochutlaHospital General “Dr. Pedro Espinosa Rueda”
AGE (YEARS)p = 1.000p = 0.157p = 0.127p = 1.000
<180 (0)100% (1)0 (0)0 (0)
18–24100% (1)0 (0)50% (1)100% (1)
25–340 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
35–44 0 (0)0 (0)50% (1)0 (0)
PRIMIGRAVIDAp = 1.000p = 0.353p = 0.534p = 0.406
(n/N = %)0100% (1/1)0100% (1/1)
MULTIGRAVIDAp = 1.000p = 0.353p = 0.534p = 0.406
(n/N = %)100% (1/1)0100% (2/2)0
CESAREANp = 1.000p = 0.490p = 1.000p = 0.464
(n/N = %)0100% (1/1)50% (1/2)0
GESTATION WEEKSp = 1.000p = 0.137p = 1.000p = 1.000
<380000
38 to 40100% (1/1)0100% (2/2)100% (1/1)
>400100% (1/1)00
Table 4. Relationship between positive PCR in newborns and somatometry data.
Table 4. Relationship between positive PCR in newborns and somatometry data.
CESSAHospital Santa Maria HuatulcoHospital de San Pedro PochutlaHospital General “Dr. Pedro Espinosa Rueda”
GESTATIONAL AGE (weeks)p = 0.543p = 0.451p = 0.033p = 1.000
<38100% (1/1)100% (1/1)50% (1/2)0
38 to 40000100% (1/1)
>400000
FEMALEp = 1.000p = 1.000p = 0.496p = 0.435
(n/N = %)100% (1/1)0 (0/1)100% (2/2)100% (1/1)
DELIVERY 1p = 1.000p = 0.451p = 1.000p = 1.000
(n/N = %)100% (1/1)0 (0/1)50% (1/2)100% (1/1)
CESAREANp = 1.000p = 0.451p = 1.000p = 1.000
(n/N = %)0 (0/1)100% (1/0)50% (1/2)0 (0/1)
WEIGHT (grams)p = 1.00p = 1.000p = 1.000p = 1.000
Normal: 2.5–4.0100% (1/1)100% (1/1)100% (2/2)100% (1/1)
Low: <2.50000
High: >4.00000
SIZE (cm)p = 1.000p = 1.000p = 1.000p = 1.000
Normal: 45–53100% (1/1)100% (1/1)100% (2/2)100% (1/1)
Low: <450000
High: >530000
HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE (cm)p = 1.000p = 1.000p = 0.513p = 1.00
Normal: 33–35100% (1/1)100% (1/1)50% (1/2)100% (1/1)
Low: <330050% (1/2)0
High: >350000
APGAR (1 min) PCR + Mean (SD)987.5 (0.7)8
APGAR (5 min) PCR + Mean (SD)998.5 (0.7)8
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Crisóstomo-Vázquez, M.d.P.; Rodríguez-Martínez, G.; Jiménez-Rojas, V.; Eligio-García, L.; Reyes-López, A.; Hernández-Ramírez, M.; Hernández-Juárez, F.; Romero-Zamora, J.L.; Vivanco-Tellez, S.G.; Solorzano-Santos, F.; et al. Trypanosoma cruzi DNA Identification in Breast Milk from Mexican Women with Chagas Disease. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2660. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122660

AMA Style

Crisóstomo-Vázquez MdP, Rodríguez-Martínez G, Jiménez-Rojas V, Eligio-García L, Reyes-López A, Hernández-Ramírez M, Hernández-Juárez F, Romero-Zamora JL, Vivanco-Tellez SG, Solorzano-Santos F, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi DNA Identification in Breast Milk from Mexican Women with Chagas Disease. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(12):2660. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122660

Chicago/Turabian Style

Crisóstomo-Vázquez, María del Pilar, Griselda Rodríguez-Martínez, Verónica Jiménez-Rojas, Leticia Eligio-García, Alfonso Reyes-López, María Hernández-Ramírez, Francisco Hernández-Juárez, José Luis Romero-Zamora, Silvia Guadalupe Vivanco-Tellez, Fortino Solorzano-Santos, and et al. 2024. "Trypanosoma cruzi DNA Identification in Breast Milk from Mexican Women with Chagas Disease" Microorganisms 12, no. 12: 2660. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122660

APA Style

Crisóstomo-Vázquez, M. d. P., Rodríguez-Martínez, G., Jiménez-Rojas, V., Eligio-García, L., Reyes-López, A., Hernández-Ramírez, M., Hernández-Juárez, F., Romero-Zamora, J. L., Vivanco-Tellez, S. G., Solorzano-Santos, F., Luna-Pineda, V. M., & Campos-Valdez, G. (2024). Trypanosoma cruzi DNA Identification in Breast Milk from Mexican Women with Chagas Disease. Microorganisms, 12(12), 2660. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122660

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop