Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Poultry Nutrition to Combat Salmonella: Insights from the Literature
Next Article in Special Issue
Depression Treatment: Is There a Role for Botulinum Toxin Type A?
Previous Article in Journal
Tunnel Infection and Peritonitis Induced by Staphylococcus aureus Due to Decubitus Change of the Anterior Abdominal Wall in a Patient on Peritoneal Dialysis: Case Report
Previous Article in Special Issue
Special Issue: Gram-Positive Bacterial Toxins
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expression of Recombinant Clostridial Neurotoxin by C. tetani

by
Brieana M. Gregg
1,2,
Sonal Gupta
1,
William H. Tepp
1 and
Sabine Pellett
1,*
1
Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
2
Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27157, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(12), 2611; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122611
Submission received: 16 November 2024 / Revised: 11 December 2024 / Accepted: 13 December 2024 / Published: 17 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gram Positive Toxins Producing Organisms, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
Tetanus neurotoxins (TeNT) and botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are closely related ~150 kDa protein toxins that together comprise the group of clostridial neurotoxins (CNTs) expressed by various species of Clostridia. While TeNT is expressed as a single polypeptide, BoNTs are always produced alongside multiple non-toxic proteins that form a stabilizing complex with BoNT and are encoded in a conserved toxin gene cluster. It is unknown how tent evolved without a similar gene cluster and why complex-free TeNT is secreted as a stable and soluble protein by C. tetani, whereas complexing proteins appear to be essential for BoNT stability in culture supernatants of C. botulinum. To assess whether the stability of TeNT is due to an innate property of the toxin or is a result of C. tetani’s intra- and extra-cellular environment, both TeNT and complex-free BoNT/A1ERY were expressed recombinantly in atoxic C. tetani and analyzed for expression and stability. The strong clostridial ferredoxin (fdx) promotor resulted in the expression of recombinant TeNT at greater levels and earlier time points than endogenously produced TeNT. Recombinant BoNT/A1ERY was similarly expressed by atoxic C. tetani, although partial degradation was observed. The rBoNT/A1ERY produced in C. tetani was also partially proteolytically processed to the dichain form. Investigations of bacterial growth media and pH conditions found that the stability of rTeNT and rBoNT/A1ERY in spent media of C. tetani or C. botulinum was affected by growth media but not by pH. These data indicate that the distinct metabolism of C. tetani or C. botulinum under various growth conditions is a primary factor in creating a more or less favorable environment for complex-free CNT stability.

1. Introduction

Tetanospasmin, or tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT), is a bacterial toxin expressed by the anaerobic, Gram-positive, bacilli Clostridium tetani (C. tetani). TeNT and the closely related botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), together known as the clostridial neurotoxin (CNT) family, are the most potent natural toxins known to humans [1,2]. TeNT is the agent responsible for tetanus, which is a potentially deadly disease causing long-lasting spastic paralysis of skeletal muscles. The dramatic clinical presentations of tetanus, including locked jaw and extreme muscle spasms, have been noted in medical manuscripts as early as the third to fifth century BC. However, it was not until the late 19th century that the cause of the disease was determined to be the TeNT produced by C. tetani [3,4]. C. tetani spores are found nearly ubiquitously across the world in soil, dirt, and manure, and they may germinate and begin TeNT expression when exposed to sufficiently anaerobic environments such as a deep wound [4,5].
TeNT is expressed by vegetative C. tetani cells as a ~150 kDa single-chain polypeptide, which the bacteria proteolytically process into a 50 kDa light chain (LC) and 100 kDa heavy chain (HC) linked by a disulfide bond [6]. If humans are exposed to the toxin through the infection of a deep wound, TeNT holotoxin is released into the circulation and makes its way to the peripheral nervous system, where it is endocytosed into motor-neuron nerve endings, which is followed by intra-axonal retrograde transport and transcytosis to inhibitory interneurons of the central nervous system [7,8,9]. Here, the zinc endopeptidase LC is released into the cytosol of inhibitory neurons and cleaves Vesicle-Associated Membrane Protein 2 (VAMP2). VAMP2 is a critical component in assembling Soluble NSF Attachment protein Receptor (SNARE) complexes [10], and its cleavage halts the SNARE-mediated membrane fusion of neurotransmitter-containing vesicles, thus blocking the release of inhibitory neurotransmitters gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine [11,12]. This results in continued neuromuscular excitation and the spastic paralysis characteristic of tetanus. TeNT is extremely potent, with an estimated minimum mouse lethal dose of only 0.2 ng/kg in humans [13], although the development of a successful toxoid vaccine has markedly lowered adult and neonatal tetanus case numbers in countries with robust vaccination programs [5].
BoNTs are a family of closely related protein toxins and are the agents responsible for botulism, which is a rare but extremely serious disease characterized by descending flaccid paralysis [1,2,14]. BoNTs are produced by several species of Clostridium, including Clostridium botulinum (C. botulinum) and Clostridium baratii (C. baratii), and have been traditionally categorized into seven immunogenically distinct serotypes (BoNT/A-G) containing over 45 subtype variations and mosaic toxins [15,16]. Like TeNT, BoNTs are produced as ~150 kDa single-chain proteins that are subsequently converted by endogenous or exogenous proteases to the more active AB-type dichain toxins consisting of a catalytically active LC linked via disulfide bond to an HC responsible for neuronal cell binding and LC translocation [17,18]. BoNTs similarly target vertebrate neurons, although intoxication occurs primarily at cholinergic nerve terminals, where the LC-mediated cleavage of various SNARE targets prevents the fusion of acetylcholine-containing vesicles to the membrane of the presynaptic nerve terminal [19,20]. The absence of acetylcholine signaling in the synaptic cleft results in flaccid muscular paralysis as opposed to the spastic paralysis brought about by TeNT intoxication.
Although TeNT and BoNTs share a great deal of similarity regarding overall toxin structure and function, there are several key differences. BoNTs are highly diverse, and the recent use of large bioinformatic databases has led to the discovery of bont genes across the plasmids, bacteriophages, and chromosomes of multiple Clostridial species [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Across serotypes, bont toxin genes range in nucleotide identity from ~32 to 75% [27]. All bont serotypes and subtypes are found clustered with genes coding for a variety of neurotoxin-associated proteins (NAPs), which stabilize and protect BoNTs from chemical and enzymatic threats [1,21] and aid BoNTs passage through gastrointestinal tracts after oral exposure [22]. NAPs encoded within the gene cluster vary by toxin serotype [23], although all presently discovered serotypes possess a gene encoding for non-toxic non-hemagglutinin (NTNH) protein. NTNH is a ~130–150 kDa protein sharing much of its domain structure with BoNTs, and it binds the associated BoNT to form a ~300 kDa minimal progenitor complex (M-PTC) [28,29]. The binding of additional NAPs to NTNH results in a full progenitor complex (PTC) up to ~900 kDa in size [28].
In contrast, the tent operon is simpler, consisting only of a plasmid-encoded promoter region, the positive regulator tetR, and the adjacent tent gene [30,31]. Unlike bont genes, tent is highly conserved among toxigenic C. tetani strains, and no immunogenically distinct TeNT serotypes have been reported [32]. There also is no evidence of TeNT forming a complex with NAPs analogous to those of BoNTs or otherwise. This prompts the question of what allows the stable production of TeNT without the need for complexing proteins, when there appears to be universal evolutionary pressure for the retention of BoNT NAP genes [22]. The goal of this study was to determine if the stability of TeNT in C. tetani culture supernatants is due to the environment created by C. tetani metabolism or to the resistance of TeNT to proteases that may be present in a C. tetani culture supernatant.
Expression analyses of rCNTs in an atoxic C. tetani strain indicate high production levels of both rTeNT and rBoNT
ERY dependent on the promoter used and with at least partial proteolytic processing to the dichain. Comparative analysis of the relative stability of BoNT/A1 and TeNT in spent C. botulinum and C. tetani culture media suggested that both rCNTs were susceptible to degradation and that modified Mueller Miller media enhanced the stability of rCNTs. Our data reveal that the stability of complex-free TeNT and BoNT/A was similarly affected by the environment created as a result of metabolism during the fermentation of C. tetani and C. botulinum, suggesting that an atoxic C. tetani strain lacking the endogenous tent may be useful as a high-level production system of complex-free rBoNT and rTeNT.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Biosafety and Security

Our Wisconsin laboratory and personnel are registered with the CDC Select Agent Program for research involving botulinum neurotoxins and botulinum neurotoxin-producing strains of clostridia. The research program, procedures, occupational health plan, documentation, security, and facilities are closely monitored by the University of Wisconsin—Madison Biosecurity Task Force, University of Wisconsin—Madison Office of Biological Safety, the University of Wisconsin Select Agent Program, and at regular intervals by the CDC and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) as part of the University of Wisconsin—Madison Select Agent Program. All personnel have undergone suitability assessments and completed rigorous and continuing biosafety training, including biosafety level 3 (BSL3) and select agent practices before participating in laboratory studies involving botulinum neurotoxins and neurotoxigenic C. botulinum strains. All recombinant DNA protocols for the construction of the recombinant BoNT genes and their expression in C. botulinum strains have been approved by the University of Wisconsin Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC), and specific experiments were approved by the Division of Select Agents and Toxins at the CDC. A dual use research of concern (DURC) risk mitigation plan has been established and approved by the University of Wisconsin—Madison Select Agent Program and NIAID for these experiments.

2.2. Media and Reagents

Culture media reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and BD Difco (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). HySoy (PHBT30) and HySoyT (PHBT31) were purchased from Kerry (Formerly QuestSheffield; Tralee, Ireland). Antibiotics (chloramphenicol, cycloserine, kanamycin, thiamphenicol) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used at the following concentrations: in E. coli: kanamycin 30 µg/mL, chloramphenicol 25 µg/mL in agar and 12.5 µg/mL in liquid media; C. botulinum: thiamphenicol 15 µg/mL; trimethoprim (1.5 µg/mL), sulfamethoxazole (30 µg/mL), and cycloserine (250 µg/mL).

2.3. Bacterial Strains

ATCC C. tetani 454: BioProject PRJNA158341, Gen Bank assembly GCA_000987095.1; ATCC C. tetani 19406: BioProject PRJNA260197, GenBank assembly GCA_000762305.1; C. botulinum LNT01 [33] is an atoxic strain, lacking the entire bont gene cluster including both the toxin and all associated complexing proteins. E. coli conjugative donor strains were purchased from Plasmid Vectors (University of Nottingham, UK). Briefly, these are derivatives of commercial strains wherein the conjugative plasmid R702 has been inserted to aid in transfer of the plasmid to Clostridial species. The resulting strains, along with the commercial strain they were derived from, are as follows: E. coli CA434 (HB101), S. Express (NEB, Express). Further information regarding these strains, including genotypes, may be found at https://plasmidvectors.com/donor-strains/ (accessed on 16 December 2024). E. coli 10 beta was purchased from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA). E. coli was grown at 37 °C in either liquid LB agitated at 225 rpm or on LB agar plates supplemented with corresponding antibiotics for plasmid selection. Clostridia cultures were grown in static nitrogen-flushed hungate tubes, and the handling of culture was carried out within an anaerobic chamber (Forma Anerobic System, Marietta, OH, USA). The atmosphere consists of 80% N2, 10% CO2, and 10% H2. E. coli, C. botulinum, and C. tetani cultures were grown in the indicated liquid media or agar plate and formulated as follows. Tryptone peptone glucose yeast media (TPGY): 5% trypticase peptone, 0.5% bacto peptone, 0.4% glucose, 2% yeast extract, 0.1% L-cysteine HCl (pH 7.3–7.4); toxin production media (TPM): 2% trypticase peptone, 0.5% glucose, 1% yeast extract (pH 7.3); tryptone, yeast, glucose media (TYG): 3% bacto tryptone, 2% yeast extract, 1% glucose, 0.1% sodium thioglycolate; HySoy: 5% HySoy (Kerry, Tralee, Ireland), 0.75% glucose, 0.0125% L-cysteine, 0.0125% L-tyrosine, 0.006% FeSO4, 0.5% NaCl, 0.05% Na2HPO4, 0.0175% KH2PO4, 0.05% MgSO4 7H2O (pH 6.8). Modified Mueller Miller media was prepared as described in Lantham et al. [34]: (per liter) NZ Casein TT 43.5 g, glucose 9.7 g, NaCl 2.5 g, reduced iron powder 0.5 g, MgSO4 0.1g, L-cysteine 125 mg, uracil 1.25 mg, calcium pantotenate 1 mg, vitamin B12 0.05 mg, nicotinic acid 0.25 mg, riboflavin 0.25 mg, thiamine HCl 0.25 mg, pyridoxin HCl 0.25 mg, biotin 2.5 µg. When noted, media were prepared with reduced iron powder at a concentration of 0.5 g/L, which replaced the use of FeSO4. We used 0.5 mg/mL resazurin as an anerobic indicator in agar plates.

2.4. Antibiotic Sensitivity of C. tetani and E. coli Strains

Triplicate samples of each strain were grown on anaerobic TPGY (C. tetani) or aerobic LB (E. coli) agar plates at 37 °C for 72 h. Strains were considered weakly resistant if there was minimal bacterial growth compared to resistant strains or if growth did not appear within 24–48 h after plating.

2.5. Generation of TeNT Plasmid Constructs

Isolation of genomic DNA (gDNA) from wild type C. tetani 64001: Unless otherwise stated, all centrifugation steps in gDNA isolation were performed at 16,000× g. C. tetani 64001 was grown for 7 h in TPGY liquid media; then, 1 mL of aliquot was centrifuged for 5 min, and the cell pellet was resuspended in 300 µL 1X TES buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.1 M NaCl, and 0.001 M EDTA), 10 µ L RNase A (100 mg/mL, Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and 100 µL lysozyme (20 mg/mL, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Following 30-minute incubation at 37 °C, samples were treated with 50 µL 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and 50 µL proteinase K (10 mg/mL, Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA), which was followed by another 30-min incubation at 25 °C. Then, 100 µL 5M sodium perchlorate was added, and the sample was incubated for 10 min at 25 °C. Afterwards, 600 µL phenol-chloroform-isoamyl (25:24:1) mixture was dispensed into a Phasemaker tube (Invitrogen Thermo Fisher,#A33248, Waltham, MA, USA) along with 600 µL of the culture lysate sample and hand inverted for 5 min before 5 min centrifugation. The supernatant was carefully transferred into 600 µL fresh phenol-chloroform-isoamyl (25:24:1) before inversion, and then the centrifugation steps were repeated. The resulting supernatant was transferred into pre-chilled 100% EtOH and inverted until gDNA precipitation was visible and could be removed for overnight incubation in 4 °C 70% EtOH. The sample was briefly centrifuged, EtOH was aspirated off, and any residual EtOH was allowed to evaporate before resuspension of the gDNA in 10 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.0.
Primers ‘NdeI-tent’ and ‘tent-NheI’ were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies Inc. (Coralville, IA, USA) and used to amplify the tent gene from the gDNA. They include the addition of a restriction sites NdeI directly upstream and NheI directly downstream of the tent to aid in the insertion of the gene fragment into cloning vectors.
NdeI-tent (5′CGCATATGATACGTATGCCAATAACCATAAATAATTTTAGATATAGTG3′)
tent-NheI (5′CGGCTAGCTTAATCATTTGTCCATCCTTCATCTGTAGG3′)
PCR amplification was performed using a Q5 High Fidelity PCR master mix (NEB), 10 µM primers and ~100 ng C. tetani 64001 gDNA in a GeneAmp PCR 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The resulting ~4 kb PCR product was eluted from agarose gel using the Monarch DNA Gel Extraction Kit (NEB) and confirmed via Sanger sequencing. Then, tent was digested with restriction enzymes NdeI and NheI to facilitate insertion into the PJET1.2 (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) cloning vector containing either the thl or fdx promotor. All cloning steps were carried out using the CloneJet PCR Cloning Kit (K1231, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting PJET vectors were digested with SbfI and NheI to excise thl-tent or fdx-tent regions, which were inserted into pMTL82151. This generated pMTL82152-TeNT and pMTL82153-TeNT. tetR is located slightly upstream of tent on the E88 plasmid and is preceded by its own promotor (ptetR) and followed by the tent promotor (ptent) [30,35]. We synthesized a segment ~200 bp prior to tetR to the start of tent, which was flanked by Sbf1 and NdeI restriction enzyme sites for seamless insertion of the region into the shuttle vector. tetR contains an internal NdeI restriction site (CATATG), so a silent point mutation was introduced to eliminate the site (CACATG). The ~1 kb region (referred to as tetR) was synthesized by GeneArt (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA), using the publicly available C. tetani E88 plasmid pE88 sequence (GenBank Accession AF528097.1). tetR was cloned directly into pMTL82151 using SbfI and NdeI restriction enzymes, and subsequent cloning inserted tent using NdeI and NheI restriction enzymes. This generated pMTL82155-TeNT.

2.6. Generation of BoNT/A1ERY Plasmid Constructs

The gene for catalytically inactive BoNT/A1 (bont/a1ERY) possesses three point mutations at E224Q, R363A, and Y366F. This toxin has not been shown to induce detectable toxicity [21,36] and thus is excluded from Tier 1 Select Agent regulations regarding the expression of rBoNTs. The bont/a1ERY was excised out of PJET 1.2-bont/a1ERYvia restriction enzymes NheI and NdeI. This digest excised bont/a1ERY, which was inserted into pMTL vectors already containing the fdx promotor region. This generated pMTL82153-BoNT/A1ERY. All constructs were confirmed via whole plasmid sequencing.

2.7. Conjugation of pMTL Plasmids into C. tetani

Plasmids were transformed into E. coli donor strains CA434 (for BoNT/A1ERY constructs) [37] or S. Express (for TeNT constructs) as previously described in LB media supplemented with 30 µg/mL kanamycin (maintenance of the R702 conjugative plasmid) and 15 µg/mL chloramphenicol (analogous to thiamphenicol; used in E. coli to maintain pMTL vectors). Plasmid constructs which displayed increased instability were prescreened prior to mating via plasmid isolation (QIA Spin MiniPrep Kit, Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) followed by restriction enzyme digest. Plasmid conjugation was performed essentially as described in previous studies [37,38] with the following alterations. C. tetani 454 and 19406 were anaerobically cultured at 37 °C in unsupplemented tryptone peptone glucose yeast (TPGY) media to the mid-log phase of OD600 0.6 to 0.7 as an overgrowth of the recipient strain, which resulted in a decrease in the overall conjugation efficiency. Liquid cultures of the transformed E. coli donor strains were then anaerobically co-incubated with liquid culture of either C. tetani 454 or 19406 on unsupplemented TPGY agar plates. Samples were allowed to mate for 24 h at 37 °C before cultures were resuspended and transferred to fresh TPGY plates (3% agar) supplemented with the TSC + thiamphenicol antibiotic combination. After growth was visible on the plates, random colonies were selected and cultured in TPGY, and then their plasmids were sequenced to confirm maintenance of the toxin gene.

2.8. Sequencing

Whole plasmid sequencing was performed using the Oxford Nanopore MinION and Rapid Barcoding Kit 24 (SQK-RBK114.24, Oxford Nanopore, Oxford, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Read assemblies were performed in EPI2ME, and sequences were analyzed in UGENE V47.0 and MacVector software. Sanger sequencing was performed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Biotechnology Center.

2.9. SDS-PAGE and Western Blot

Purified inactive 8MTT TeNT [39] was used as the TeNT toxin control, and purified BoNT/A1 holotoxin [40] was used as the BoNT toxin control. After culturing, the whole culture, pellet, and supernatant samples were collected at the indicated time points. Whole cultures were centrifuged at 16,000× g for 10 min in order to separate the cell pellet and supernatant. Cell pellets were resuspended in an equal volume of 1X TES buffer with 2 mg/mL lysozyme (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and incubated at 35 °C for 10 min. For the collection of cell growth from solid agar plates, each plate was flooded with 10 mL 1X PBS and manually resuspended with a plate scraper. This whole culture was then processed into supernatant and pellet samples as above. Expression samples were mixed with 4X NuPAGE LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) to 1X with or without the addition of 100 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) as a reducing agent. Samples were heated to 95 °C for 5 min and run on 4–12% Bis-Tris (Invitrogen) gels before transfer to 0.45 µm PVDF membrane. Western blots were probed with primary mouse polyclonal anti-8MTT (prepared in the lab) or rabbit polyclonal anti-BoNT/A1 antibody (prepared in the lab) at 1:1000 dilution. Secondary goat anti-mouse, and bovine anti-rabbit alkaline phosphatase antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) were used at 1:7500 dilutions. Blots were exposed to KPL PhosphoGlo AP substrate (SeraCare Life Sciences, Milford, MA, USA) prior to imaging.

2.10. Toxin Stability in Spent Culture Media

Toxin stability experiments were conducted similar to previous [41]. Briefly, 10 mL nitrogen-flushed hungate tubes of the specified media were inoculated with 100 µL of either C. tetani 454 (82153) or C. botulinum LNT01 [33]. LNT01 is an atoxic strain, lacking the bont and associated complexing genes. Replicates (n = 3) were cultured statically at 37 °C for 96 h, after which the whole culture was centrifuged at 6000× g for 10 min, and culture supernatants were pH adjusted to pH 5, 6, 7, and 8 via 10 N NaOH and 1 N HCl. Each replicate group additionally included a spent media sample which was not pH adjusted and one sample of fresh media which had never supported bacterial growth. All samples were sterile filtered through 0.22 µm polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) filters. Then, 50 ng (for BoNT/A1) or 250 ng (for TeNT-8MTT) of sterile, purified toxin were added to each sample and left to incubate at 37 °C for 24 h. Samples were analyzed via SDS-PAGE and Western blotting, and the concentration of the ~150 kDa protein bands was quantified via densitometry (Azure Spot v 2.0.062).

3. Results

3.1. C. tetani 454 and 19406 Are Compatible Recipient Strains for Conjugative Plasmid Transfer

Two atoxic C. tetani strains were chosen for our analysis of rTeNT and rBoNT expression due to their unique properties and relatedness to the Harvard strain, which is used industrially to produce TeNT [42,43]. Strain ATCC 19406 is a North American laboratory diagnostic strain closely related to the ‘Harvard’ strain but lacking the entire 74 kb toxin-encoding plasmid [44]. C. tetani ATCC 454 is an atoxic strain isolated from Chinese clinical fecal samples in the 1920s and also closely related to the Harvard strain, although it only lacks an approximately 20 kb segment of the plasmid including both tetR and tent [44,45].
As little information is published regarding the antibiotic susceptibility of C. tetani strains outside of a clinical context, we first screened both strains of C. tetani as well as potential E. coli conjugative donor strains CA434, S. Express, Interstellar, and TopSex [37,46] for susceptibility to a variety of commonly used antibiotics and antibiotic combinations at various concentrations (Supplemental Table S1). Both C. tetani and E. coli are sensitive to thiamphenicol at 15 μg/mL, so we opted to use plasmid vectors containing the thiamphenicol resistance gene catP to select for maintenance of the desired plasmid [47]. Additionally, we chose the following antibiotic combination to select against the E. coli donor strain as it was effective to select against all tested donor strains: trimethoprim (1.5 µg/mL), sulfamethoxazole (30 µg/mL), and cycloserine (250 µg/mL) (TSC). Utilization of TSC + thiamphenicol allowed for the selection of only C. tetani containing the desired plasmid after conjugation.
To determine which origins of replication may be utilized in these strains, we screened several modular pMTL8000 series clostridial shuttle vectors [47] by conjugating them into C. tetani 19406 and 454. The pMTL82151 (C. botulinum replicon pBP1) and pMTL87151 (C. perfringens replicon pIP404) [47,48] reliably yielded trans-conjugants, indicating their functional origins of replications in these strains. However, pMTL87151 contains an internal NdeI restriction site which would complicate cloning, and therefore pMTL82151 was selected as the shuttle vector for future experiments. Finally, three promotors were examined for expressing rTeNT. The pMTL82152 encodes the ribosome binding site (RBS) and thiolase promotor (thl) of C. acetobutylicum [49], while pMTL82153 encodes the RBS and ferredoxin promoter (fdx) of C. pasteurianum [50]. The pMTL82155 was created by cloning the region encoding the C. tetani positive regulator tetR, the endogenous tetR promotor (ptetR), and the tent promotor (ptent) from wild-type C. tetani strain (64001) into pMTL82151 [35].
Following successful cloning and sequence verification of the tent constructs, it was observed that several plasmids underwent rearrangement following transformation into the E. coli donor strains. E. coli CA434, a recA + strain, was used as the preferred donor strain and resulted in the successful conjugation of pMTL82153-TeNT into both C. tetani 454 and 19406. The pMTL82155-TeNT was conjugated into C. tetani 454 via E. coli S. Express. The pMTL82152-TeNT plasmid was consistently rearranged in any of the tested E. coli donor strains and thus was not further pursued.

3.2. The Fdx Promotor Stimulates rTeNT Expression Earlier and in Greater Quantities than tetR and Wild-Type Strains

The expression of rTeNT in C. tetani strain 454 and 19406 was examined in three different growth media using three different promoters. Mueller and Miller developed a media formulation for increased expression of TeNT [42], which has been analyzed and improved upon in the decades since its creation. Of specific interest were formulations by Latham et al. (‘modified Mueller Miller media’), which removed several inorganic salts and amino acids [34], and by Demain et al. (‘HySoy media’), which replaced animal and dairy products with soy-based alternatives [51,52]. A final option, ‘HySoy-T’, is a commercially available media which utilizes an alternative source of soy peptides, but it is otherwise identical to the HySoy formulation. Each of these media was supplemented with 0.5 g/L of reduced iron powder, which has been shown to increase toxin production in C. tetani [52,53].
Western blot analysis of whole bacterial culture revealed that the expression of ~150 kDa TeNT holotoxin was greater in C. tetani strains containing the pMTL82153-TeNT plasmid compared to the pMTL82155-TeNT plasmid or expression in wt C. tetani strains, although the toxins varied in quantity and stability depending on the culture formulation (Supplemental Figure S1). The highest and most consistent expression levels of rTeNT were observed in modified Mueller Miller (+reduced iron), where rTeNT expression in C. tetani 454/19406 (82153-TeNT) was first observed at 24 h and remained constant until 96 h of culture (Figure 1). In contrast, endogenous TeNT production by a wild-type C. tetani and rTeNT production driven by the endogenous promoter (C. tetani 454 (82155-TeNT)) was not reliably detected in Mueller Miller media using the same Western blot conditions (Figure 1), but it was observed after 96 h of growth in HySoy or HySoy-T media (Supplemental Figure S1). This toxin production coincided with a rapid pH drop from the roughly neutral pH up to 72 h to pH ~4.8–5.2 by 96 h. Even then, the quantity of TeNT expressed was lower than that of either 454 (82153-TeNT) or 19406 (82153-TeNT). These data indicate that rTeNT expression under the control of the fdx promotor in atoxic C. tetani results in a higher and more reliable production of the toxin independent of the metabolic shifts required for endogenous TeNT production [54,55]. Both C. tetani 454 and 19406 expressed rTeNT at roughly the same levels with no discernable difference in toxin break-down between the two. However, C. tetani strain 19406 had a tendency to swarm after conjugation, making it difficult to isolate single colonies. Thus, strain 454 was chosen for additional experiments.
Western blot of recombinant TeNT expression by C. tetani 454 and C. tetani 19406 was cultured in modified Mueller Miller (supplemented with 0.5 g/L reduced iron powder) media for 24–96 h. Expression construct pMTL 82153-TeNT contains the ferredoxin (fdx) promotor, while pMTL 82155-TeNT contains the C. tetani positive regulator tetR as well as the endogenous tetR promotor (ptetR) and the tent promotor (ptent) regions. To maintain the recombinant plasmids, C. tetani 454 and 19406 culture media were supplemented with 15 ug/mL thiamphenicol. Wild-type C. tetani WR23 was used as an expression control. All samples are unreduced, whole culture.

3.3. Full-Length Recombinant BoNT/A1ERY Is Produced by C. tetani 454 Without Complexing Proteins

To examine if other CNTs may be stably expressed in C. tetani 454, we generated a pMTL expression construct encoding catalytically inactive BoNT/A1ERY (pMTL82153-BoNT/A1ERY) and conjugated it into C. tetani 454 via the E. coli donor strain CA434.
C. tetani 454 (82153-A1ERY) was cultured alongside C. botulinum Hall A hyper/tox-(83152-A1ERY), which has previously been shown to produce high levels of rBoNT/A complex [41,56,57]. C. botulinum Hall A hyper/ tox-retains genes encoding BoNT/A NAPs allow for a comparison of BoNT/A1ERY expression in Clostridial strains with and without native complexing proteins. Samples were cultured in TPGY, modified Mueller Miller media (+reduced iron) and toxin production media (TPM) for 24–96 h. Modified Mueller Miller media is commonly used to support TeNT production in C. tetani, TPM is commonly used to express BoNTs in C. botulinum strains and TPGY is a general clostridial growth media.
Western blot analysis demonstrated that fermentation in TPGY resulted in a small amount of 150 kDa full-length rBoNT/A1ERY in both C. tetani 454 and C. botulinum Hall A hyper tox-, but a large number of smaller bands indicating degradation were observed, suggesting that TPGY may not be an optimal expression media. In C. tetani 454 (82153-A1ERY) cultured in TPM, full-length rBoNT/A1ERY was detected as early as 24 h in the cell pellet with increasing amounts detected in whole culture samples by 144 h (Figure 2A). The toxin appeared to be partially post-translationally processed into the active dichain form at 144 h, as evidenced by the separation of the ~150 kDa holotoxin into ~100 kDa heavy chain and ~50 kDa light chain after reduction in the sample by DTT (Figure 2B). This demonstrates that a recombinant complex-free botulinum toxin can be expressed by a C. tetani strain and can be converted to its activated dichain form via endogenous proteases. However, compared to the production of the rBoNT/A1ERY complex by C. botulinum Hall A hyper tox-, production in C.tetani grown in TPM was lower and occurred later during culture (Figure 2). In both cultures, a significant portion of the toxin appeared degraded as evidenced by smaller MW bands on the Western blot (Figure 2).
Similarly, when cultured in modified Mueller Miller (+reduced iron) media, the full-length toxin expressed by C. tetani 454 (82153-A1ERY) appeared more degraded than that of rBoNT/A1ERY expressed in C. botulinum Hall A hyper/tox-(Figure 3A). Prior studies have reported that the mechanism by which reduced iron powder increases C. tetani growth and toxin production may be providing the presence of an insoluble surface area [53]. The examination of rBoNT/ A1ERY expression by C. tetani 454 (82153-A1ERY) on modified Mueller Miller media agar plates without the addition of reduced iron resulted in strong toxin production with minimal break-down (Figure 3B), supporting the presence of an insoluble growth surface as playing a role in C. tetani growth and toxin production.

3.4. The Role of pH in CNT Expression and Stability

A previous study indicated that a culture pH below pH 6 plays a critical role in BoNT complex stability produced by C. botulinum [41]. In this study, the culture pH varied depending on growth conditions (Supplemental Table S2). C. tetani 454 (82153-TeNT) cultured in Mueller Miller (+reduced iron) had an average (n = 3) culture media pH of ~5.2 at 24 h and ~4.9 by 144 h with TeNT production detected throughout the time period (Figure 1). When the same sample was cultured in TPM, the pH was similar, averaging ~5 at 24 h and ~4.9 at 144 h. However, C. tetani 454 (82153-A1ERY) cultured in modified Mueller Miller (+reduced iron) had an average pH of ~6.7 at 24 h, which dropped to ~6.2 by 144 h, and when cultured in TPM, the samples maintained a pH of ~6.9–7.0 from 24–144 h. This trend was very similar for the negative, toxin-free expression control C. tetani 454 (82153), indicating that the tent gene cluster itself might contribute to the metabolically induced pH drop of endogenous C. tetani [35,54,55].

3.5. BoNT/A1 Holotoxin Is More Stable in Spent Modified Mueller Miller Media than in Spent TPM

In order to directly examine pH dependence of complex-free BoNT/A1 and TeNT stability in culture supernatants, the rCNTs were incubated in spent media of the negative expression control C. tetani 454 (82153) as well as C. botulinum LNT01 cultured in modified Mueller Miller (+reduced iron) or TPM for 4 days. Unlike C. botulinum Hall A hyper/tox-, C. botulinum LNT01 lacks the entire bont gene cluster including all complexing protein genes [33]. This allowed examination of the effects of culture pH on BoNT/A and TeNT without the possibility of any stabilizing effect from type-A complexing proteins. After 24 h incubation of BoNT/A1 or TeNT in sterile filtered spent culture media adjusted to pH 5, 6, 7, or 8, remaining 150 kDa BoNT/A1 and TeNT was assessed by Western blot (Supplemental Figure S2) and densitometry (n = 3), and in all cases, the pH of spent media had little or no impact on CNT stability (Figure 4). However, a large difference was noticed between the two tested spent media formulations. The spent TPM of C. tetani 454 resulted in almost no detectable 150 kDa toxin but rather primarily smaller protein bands consistent with specific cleavage of the protein toxin (Supplementary Figure S2). Less protein break-down and more 150 kDa protein was observed in spent TPM of C. botulinum LNT01; however, even in that case, the amount of 150 kDa TeNT or BoNT was reduced to 20–40% with distinct break-down products observed for BoNT/A1 but not for TeNT (Supplementary Figure S2). Both BoNT/A1 and TeNT exhibited far less degradation in spent modified Mueller Miller media than in spent TPM with between 60 and 80% of the added protein amount remaining as the 150 kDa band (Figure 4), although few distinct break-down products were still clearly visible (Supplementary Figure S2). Interestingly, some break-down of the 150 kDa BoNT/A1 and TeNT even in fresh media could not be ruled out, although observed decreases in 150 kDa bands were much lower in fresh media than in the spent media, and almost no break-down products were observed on the Western blot (Supplemental Figure S2). Instead, weak larger bands were observed for both toxins in fresh media, indicating the potential that minor degradation, auto-proteolysis, or aggregation may be due to media components present in both TPM and Mueller Miller media.

4. Discussion

Of all the clostridial neurotoxins, TeNT is unique in that it is not encoded in a gene cluster alongside non-toxic neurotoxin associated proteins (NAPs) and does not require NAPs to be produced as a stable protein in fermentation cultures [1]. Free BoNTs (without NAPs), on the other hand, are readily degraded by environmental and endogenous proteases [21,58], whereas complexing with NAPs to form large, multi-protein complexes prevents protein break-down under certain conditions and increases BoNT oral toxicity [28,35,59]. The production of TeNT by C. tetani is tightly controlled by a complex network of regulatory genes [35,54,55] and has been optimized for the large-scale production of stable and soluble protein to be processed for the widely used inactivated tetanus protein vaccine [42,60]. The most commonly used production media for TeNT is modified Mueller Miller [34].
Given the structural and functional similarities between BoNT and TeNT holotoxins, we hypothesized that the intra and extracellular conditions of C. tetani may be responsible for toxin stabilization and would support the recombinant expression of BoNTs without their native complexing proteins. To our knowledge, our data demonstrate the first recombinant expression of a full-length and proteolytically activated rBoNT by a C. tetani strain.
We investigated the expression of rTeNT and rBoNT/A1ERY production in C. tetani using the modular pMTL8000 expression vector system [47] combined with two C. tetani strains that are closely related to the Harvard strain [44] used for the large-scale production of TeNT [60]. Promotors for thiolase (thl; resulting in pMTL82152) and ferredoxin (fdx; resulting in pMTL82153), which are often used for high-level gene expression in Clostridial species [55], as well as a native positive regulator of tent, tetR (resulting in pMTL82155), were examined [30,31]. Despite successful cloning and plasmid sequence verification, certain pMTL expression constructs appeared to be incompatible for transformation into E. coli donor strains. Specifically, pMTL82152-TeNT, pMTL 82152-A1ERY, and pMTL82155-A1ERY displayed greatly increased rates of plasmid rearrangement following transformation into conjugative E. coli donor strains CA434 or S. Express. Whole plasmid sequencing of the plasmids isolated from E. coli revealed full or partial loss of the toxin gene and maintenance of the antibiotic resistance gene. In some cases, this gene loss and rearrangement occurred less than five hours post-transformation. Ingle et al. [61] discuss similar instances of plasmid instability of plasmids containing genes under fdx and thl promoters and propose that the high expression of certain genes downstream of strong constitutive promotors is likely detrimental to E. coli. The repeated loss of rcnt genes from plasmids pMTL82152-TeNT, pMTL82152-A1ERY, and pMTL82155-A1ERY after transformation into E. coli donor strains indicates potential selection pressure against these toxin genes in E. coli.
C. tetani 454/19406 (82153-TeNT) expressed rTeNT at higher quantities and with fewer break-down products than either the wild-type strains or C. tetani 454 (82155-TeNT), which contains the endogenous tent promotor and regulator region, tetR (Figure 1, Supplemental Figure S1). In addition, no metabolic shift [35,54,55,62] was required for the high-level production of rTeNT under the fdx promoter. This was the case in all three culture media—modified Mueller Miller (+reduced iron) [42], HySoy, and HySoy-T—although modified Mueller Miller media consistently resulted in the highest expression levels (Figure 1). A previous study found that the addition of reduced iron powder to modified Mueller Miller culture media resulted in ~6 times greater production of TeNT compared to media lacking reduced iron [53].
Interestingly, native TeNT expressed by wild-type strains and rTeNT expressed by C. tetani under the control of the endogenous tent promoter region including tetR (82155-TeNT) was largely undetected in whole culture until ~72 and 96 h, coinciding with a culture pH drop from neutral to ~4.8 (Supplemental Figure S1, Supplementary Table S2). In C. tetani Harvard strain E88, Licona et al. [62] reported that tetR and tetX expression is extremely low until the cell shifts from consuming free amino acids to peptides between 10 and 40 h, and that the upregulation in toxin synthesis genes corresponded with an increase in culture pH to ~7.2 [62]. Other studies also observed an increase in culture pH prior to cell lysis and the release of TeNT into the supernatant [63,64]. It is unclear whether the pH decrease we observed is due to growth in static cultures, as opposed to an agitated bioreactor, or whether this is a product of the recombinant protein expression. C. tetani 454/19406 (82153-TeNT) samples, which expressed tent under the control of the ferrodoxin promoter, contained high levels of rTeNT in the whole culture by 24 h with a culture pH of 4.9–5.3 maintained throughout the duration of the expression studies (Supplementary Table S2). The temporary difference in both culture pH and TeNT production between C. tetani 454 (82155-TeNT) and 454 (82153-TeNT), where the only difference is the promotor region, indicates that the tetR promotor/regulator region or the expressed TeNT itself may contribute to the metabolism of C. tetani, prompting a pH shift to acidic levels at the same time that tent is upregulated [55]. This hypothesis is consistent with C. tetani 454 (82155-TeNT) and the wild-type strain WR23 both displaying similar TeNT expression timelines and pH changes to culture media and the C. tetani 454 (82153) control strain not displaying any pH shift (Supplemental Table S2), and it raises the interesting question of a more global metabolic role for the TeNT or, more likely, TetR, beyond the regulation of TeNT production.
In order to examine the production of NAP-free rBoNT in the C. tetani expression system, the catalytically inactive bont/a1ERY was cloned into the pMTL82153 under control of the ferredoxin promoter (pMTL82153-A1ERY), and the rBoNT/A1ERY expression in C. tetani 454 (82153-A1ERY) was analyzed in comparison to the production of the BoNT/A1ERY complex in C. botulinum Hall A hyper/tox- (83152-A1ERYor both C. tetani and C. botulinum). NAP-free BoNT/A1ERY was produced in C. tetani 454 at about 50% reduced (TPM) or similar (MM + reduced iron) levels as the BoNT/A1ERY complex in C. botulinum Hall A hyper tox with evidence of at least partial proteolytic nicking to the dichain form that increased with increased culture time (Figure 2 and Figure 3A). However, an increased amount of smaller protein bands, indicating higher rates of protein degradation, were observed for the NAP-free BoNT/A1ERY produced in C. tetani 454 than for the BoNT/A1ERY complex produced in C. botulinum Hall A hyper/tox- in both media. The break-down products for BoNT/A1ERY produced in C. tetani vs. C. botulinum varied, indicating either the presence of distinct proteases in the spent media of the two organisms or the availability of distinct protease cleavage sites in complexed versus free BoNT/A1. Direct examination of the stability of BoNT/A1 and TeNT holotoxins (150 kDa, complex free) in spent culture media from a C. botulinum strain LNT01, which does not express any complexing proteins, and C. tetani 454 indicated similar stability in spent media from both strains but a strong media type dependence (Figure 4). Both toxins showed only mild partial degradation in spent Mueller Miller but strong degradation in spent TPM (Figure 4, Supplementary Figure S2). No significant pH dependence for degradation was observed under any condition. This is in contrast to a previous study that showed strong pH-dependent proteolytic degradation of the BoNT/A1 complex in spent media of C. botulinum strain Hall A hyper [41], emphasizing the protective role of NAPs and the difference in conditions required for the production of complex free versus complexed rBoNTs.
The unique pattern of degradation bands observed for both BoNT and TeNT in spent TPM and Mueller Miller media (Supplementary Figure S2) indicates the differential production or secretion of rCNT degrading proteases induced by the growth media in both C. tetani and C. botulinum and emphasizes the role of nutrient-induced bacterial metabolism on toxin production by affecting toxin stability post-translation. The unexpected observation of fewer break-down bands for both rTeNT and rBoNT/A1ERY in spent MM media of C. botulinum LNT01 than C. tetani 454 (Supplementary Figure S2) suggests that either C. botulinum strain LNT01 produces less CNT specific protease activity or that degradation is more complete to where fewer bands are detected on the gel. The fact that there was no significant difference in the amounts of remaining 150 kDa rCNT bands (Figure 4) supports the latter. While these studies indicate that complex-free TeNT and BoNT stability is largely independent of pH (Figure 4), a correlation of acidic pH and greater toxin production was observed in culture (Figure 2 and Figure 3), indicating that metabolic changes associated with pH changes may result in the production of specific sets of proteases.
Overall, the relatively good stability of 150 kDa rBoNT/A1ERY in spent Mueller Miller media of either C. tetani or C. botulinum (on average 60–80%) (Figure 3A) also suggests that C. tetani strain 454 as well as other atoxic clostridial strains grown in specific optimized media may be utilized as a new expression system for the production of complex-free recombinant CNTs for functional analysis or vaccine development. As such, an expression system is not dependent on specific NAPs for proteins of the rBoNT; the system will likely be applicable for any BoNT sero and subtypes.
Some BoNTs are not easily purified from their native C. botulinum strains in quantities sufficient for structural and functional analysis due to low expression levels or due to being produced by a dual toxin-producing strain. In addition, mutational studies require recombinant BoNT production. However, recombinant BoNT expression in an endogenous expression host is an invaluable, but underdeveloped, tool for the further functional characterization of BoNTs. Current methods for rBoNT expression rely either on E. coli, which lacks the ability to proteolytically process and activate the toxin [65], or atoxic C. botulinum type A strains, which retain native type A NAPs and have only successfully produced BoNT/A serotypes [57]. In a recent study, we found significant differences in the potency of rBoNTs produced in heterologous versus endogenous expression systems [66], although the reasons underlying these potency differences are currently unknown. This study adds a novel recombinant expression system for rBoNTs utilizing an atoxic C. tetani or C. botulinum strain.
In summary, this study demonstrated that the stable production of NAP-free TeNT by C. tetani is primarily controlled by expression strain properties and metabolic pathways that can be regulated by media formulation, and that NAP-free CNT stability in growth media is independent of pH. This study also indicates that atoxic C. tetani or other atoxic clostridia can be utilized as a novel clostridial expression system for the production of NAP-free rBoNTs and TeNT. The initial optimizations performed in this study to select the expression vector, promotor, atoxic C. tetani strain, and media formulations for the highest production levels of rCNTs lay the groundwork for this novel expression system, and additional strain-specific media and growth condition optimizations have the potential to further improve this system as a universal NAP-free CNT expression system.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms12122611/s1, Figure S1: Selection of optimal promotor and culture media for expression of recombinant toxins in C. tetani. C. tetani 454 and C. tetani 19406 were conjugated with pMTL82153-TeNT or pMTL82155-TeNT, and cultured statically at 37 °C in the noted media alongside wild type C. tetani strains 64001 and WR23. 15 ug/mL thiamphenicol was added to C. tetani 454 and 19406 growth media for maintenance of the pMTL-TeNT plasmids. 24 hour (A) and 96 hour (B) whole culture, unreduced samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot. 50 ng TeNT 8MTT served as a positive control. MM: modified Mueller Miller (+reduced iron); HS: HySoy (+reduced iron); HS-T: HySoy-T (+reduced iron); Figure S2: Representative Western blots of BoNT/A1 and TeNT stability in spent C. botulinum and C. tetani media. 3 replicate Western blots per sample condition were analyzed via densitometry to calculate the concentration of ~150 kDa holotoxin remaining after 24 h of incubation in spent C. botulinum LNT01 or C. tetani 454 media. The mean percentage of remaining full-length toxin is depicted in Figure 4. These Western blots indicate the extent and size of breakdown products under varying pH conditions; Table S1: Antibiotic sensitivity profiles of C. tetani and E. coli strains; Table S2: Average pH of culture media over time.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P. and B.M.G.; methodology, B.M.G., S.G., W.H.T. and S.P.; investigation, B.M.G., S.G., W.H.T. and S.P.; resources, S.P.; data curation, B.M.G., S.G., W.H.T. and S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, B.M.G.; writing—review and editing, B.M.G., S.G., W.H.T. and S.P.; visualization, B.M.G. and S.G.; supervision, W.H.T. and S.P.; project administration, S.P.; funding acquisition, S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The described study was supported by R01AI139306, R01AI118389, and by funds from the Food Research Institute of the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the University of Wisconsin-Madison Select Agent Committee for their support with adherence to Select Agent regulations and in maintaining our Select Agent laboratory. We thank the DURC subcommittee for DURC review of experimental procedures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Schiavo, G.; Matteoli, M.; Montecucco, C. Neurotoxins affecting neuroexocytosis. Physiol. Rev. 2000, 80, 717–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pirazzini, M.; Montecucco, C.; Rossetto, O. Toxicology and pharmacology of botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins: An update. Arch. Toxicol. 2022, 96, 1521–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chalian, W. An Essay on the History of Lockjaw. Bull. Hist. Med. 1940, 8, 171–201. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tiwari, T.S.P.; Moro, P.L.; Acosta, A.M. Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases—Chapter 21, 14th ed.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2021; pp. 315–328. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, J.; Liu, Z.; Yu, C.; Tan, K.; Gui, S.; Zhang, S.; Shen, Y. Global epidemiology and burden of tetanus from 1990 to 2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2023, 132, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lacy, D.B.; Stevens, R.C. Sequence homology and structural analysis of the clostridial neurotoxins. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 291, 1091–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ovespian, S.V.; Bodeker, M.; O’Leary, V.B.; Lawrence, G.W.; Oliver Dolly, J. Internalization and retrograde axonal trafficking of tetanus toxin in motor neurons and trans-synaptic propagation at central synapses exceed those of its C-terminal-binding fragments. Brain Struct. Funct. 2015, 220, 1825–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Megighian, A.; Pirazzini, M.; Fabris, F.; Rossetto, O.; Montecucco, C. Tetanus and tetanus neurotoxin: From peripheral uptake to central nervous tissue targets. J. Neurochem. 2021, 158, 1244–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. von Bartheld, C.S. Axonal transport and neuronal transcytosis of trophic factors, tracers, and pathogens. J. Neurobiol. 2004, 58, 295–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schoch, S.; Deak, F.; Konigstorfer, A.; Mozhayeva, M.; Sara, Y.; Sudhof, T.C.; Kavalali, E.T. SNARE function analyzed in synaptobrevin/VAMP knockout mice. Science 2001, 294, 1117–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schiavo, G.; Rossetto, O.; Tonello, F.; Montecucco, C. Intracellular targets and metalloprotease activity of tetanus and botulism neurotoxins. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 1995, 195, 257–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Albus, U.; Habermann, E. Tetanus toxin inhibits the evoked outflow of an inhibitory (GABA) and an excitatory (D-aspartate) amino acid from particulate brain cortex. Toxicon 1983, 21, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rossetto, O.; Montecucco, C. Tables of Toxicity of Botulinum and Tetanus Neurotoxins. Toxins 2019, 11, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Haim, M.; Solomon, T.L., Jr. BAM Chapter 17: Clostridium Botulinum, 8th ed.; FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 1998; Chapter 17. [Google Scholar]
  15. Davies, J.R.; Britton, A.; Liu, S.M.; Acharya, K.R. High-resolution crystal structures of the botulinum neurotoxin binding domains from subtypes A5 and A6. FEBS Open Bio 2020, 10, 1474–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hill, K.K.; Smith, T.J.; Helma, C.H.; Ticknor, L.O.; Foley, B.T.; Svensson, R.T.; Brown, J.L.; Johnson, E.A.; Smith, L.A.; Okinaka, R.T.; et al. Genetic diversity among Botulinum Neurotoxin-producing clostridial strains. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 818–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fischer, A.; Montal, M. Single molecule detection of intermediates during botulinum neurotoxin translocation across membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 10447–10452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Dong, M.; Stenmark, P. The Structure and Classification of Botulinum Toxins. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2021, 263, 11–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Binz, T. Clostridial neurotoxin light chains: Devices for SNARE cleavage mediated blockade of neurotransmission. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013, 364, 139–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Brunger, A.T.; Breidenbach, M.A.; Jin, R.; Fischer, A.; Santos, J.S.; Montal, M. Botulinum neurotoxin heavy chain belt as an intramolecular chaperone for the light chain. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3, 1191–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Gu, S.; Rumpel, S.; Zhou, J.; Strotmeier, J.; Bigalke, H.; Perry, K.; Shoemaker, C.B.; Rummel, A.; Jin, R. Botulinum neurotoxin is shielded by NTNHA in an interlocked complex. Science 2012, 335, 977–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sugii, S.; Ohishi, I.; Sakaguchi, G. Correlation between oral toxicity and in vitro stability of Clostridium botulinum type A and B toxins of different molecular sizes. Infect. Immun. 1977, 16, 910–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hill, K.K.; Xie, G.; Foley, B.T.; Smith, T.J.; Munk, A.C.; Bruce, D.; Smith, L.A.; Brettin, T.S.; Detter, J.C. Recombination and insertion events involving the botulinum neurotoxin complex genes in Clostridium botulinum types A, B, E and F and Clostridium butyricum type E strains. BMC Biol. 2009, 7, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, P.; Yin, L.; Shi, J.; Chen, P.; Xu, Y.; Liang, A.; Stenmark, P.; Doxey, A.C.; Dong, M. Identification and Characterization of Botulinum Neurotoxin Homologs from Paeniclostridium ghonii. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Interagency Botulism Research Coordinating Committee Meeting, Madison, WI, USA, 22–25 October 2023. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mansfield, M.J.; Wentz, T.G.; Zhang, S.; Lee, E.J.; Dong, M.; Sharma, S.K.; Doxey, A.C. Bioinformatic discovery of a toxin family in Chryseobacterium piperi with sequence similarity to botulinum neurotoxins. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Doxey, A.C.; Mansfield, M.J.; Montecucco, C. Discovery of novel bacterial toxins by genomics and computational biology. Toxicon 2018, 147, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hill, K.K.; Smith, T.J. Genetic Diversity Within Clostridium botulinum Serotypes, Botulinum Neurotoxin Gene Clusters and Toxin Subtypes; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gu, S.; Jin, R. Assembly and function of the botulinum neurotoxin progenitor complex. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013, 364, 21–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Benefield, D.A.; Dessain, S.K.; Shine, N.; Ohi, M.D.; Lacy, D.B. Molecular assembly of botulinum neurotoxin progenitor complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 5630–5635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Marvaud, J.C.; Eisel, U.; Binz, T.; Niemann, H.; Popoff, M.R. TetR is a positive regulator of the tetanus toxin gene in Clostridium tetani and is homologous to botR. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 5698–5702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Raffestin, S.; Dupuy, B.; Marvaud, J.C.; Popoff, M.R. BotR/A and TetR are alternative RNA polymerase sigma factors controlling the expression of the neurotoxin and associated protein genes in Clostridium botulinum type A and Clostridium tetani. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chapeton-Montes, D.; Plourde, L.; Bouchier, C.; Ma, L.; Diancourt, L.; Criscuolo, A.; Popoff, M.R.; Bruggemann, H. The population structure of Clostridium tetani deduced from its pan-genome. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Johnson, E.A.; Bradshaw, M.; Rood, J.I.; Lyras, D. Expression System for Clostridium Species. U.S. Patent US5955368A, 21 September 1999. [Google Scholar]
  34. Latham, W.C.; Bent, D.F.; Levine, L. Tetanus toxin production in the absence of protein. Appl. Microbiol. 1962, 10, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chapeton-Montes, D.; Plourde, L.; Deneve, C.; Garnier, D.; Barbirato, F.; Colombié, V.; Demay, S.; Haustant, G.; Gorgette, O.; Schmitt, C.; et al. Tetanus Toxin Synthesis is Under the Control of A Complex Network of Regulatory Genes in Clostridium tetani. Toxins 2020, 12, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rigoni, M.; Caccin, P.; Johnson, E.A.; Montecucco, C.; Rossetto, O. Site-directed mutagenesis identifies active-site residues of the light chain of botulinum neurotoxin type A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 288, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Purdy, D.; O’Keeffe, T.A.; Elmore, M.; Herbert, M.; McLeod, A.; Bokori-Brown, M.; Ostrowski, A.; Minton, N.P. Conjugative transfer of clostridial shuttle vectors from Escherichia coli to Clostridium difficile through circumvention of the restriction barrier. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 46, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marshall, K.M.; Bradshaw, M.; Johnson, E.A. Conjugative botulinum neurotoxin-encoding plasmids in Clostridium botulinum. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Przedpelski, A.; Tepp, W.H.; Pellett, S.; Johnson, E.A.; Barbieri, J.T. A Novel High-Potency Tetanus Vaccine. mBio 2020, 11, e01668-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Malizio, C.J.; Goodnough, M.C.; Johnson, E.A. Purification of Clostridium botulinum type A neurotoxin. Methods Mol. Biol. 2000, 145, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Inzalaco, H.N.; Tepp, W.H.; Fredrick, C.; Bradshaw, M.; Johnson, E.A.; Pellett, S. Posttranslational Regulation of Botulinum Neurotoxin Production in Clostridium botulinum Hall A-hyper. mSphere 2021, 6, e0032821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mueller, J.H.; Miller, P.A. Factors influencing the production of tetanal toxin. J. Immunol. 1947, 56, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Heller, H.H. Mutations in the Genus Nicolaierillus (B. tetani): Studies on Pathogenic Anaerobes VIII. J. Infect. Dis. 1922, 30, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cohen, J.E.; Wang, R.; Shen, R.F.; Wu, W.W.; Keller, J.E. Comparative pathogenomics of Clostridium tetani. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schoch, C.L.; Ciufo, S.; Domrachev, M.; Hotton, C.L.; Kannan, S.; Khovanskaya, R.; Leipe, D.; Mcveigh, R.; O’Neill, K.; Robbertse, B.; et al. NCBI Taxonomy: A comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database 2020, baaa062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Woods, C.; Humphreys, C.M.; Rodrigues, R.M.; Ingle, P.; Rowe, P.; Henstra, A.M.; Köpke, M.; Simpson, S.D.; Winzer, K.; Minton, N.P. A novel conjugal donor strain for improved DNA transfer into Clostridium spp. Anaerobe 2019, 59, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Heap, J.T.; Pennington, O.J.; Cartman, S.T.; Minton, N.P. A modular system for Clostridium shuttle plasmids. J. Microbiol. Methods 2009, 78, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Garnier, T.; Cole, S.T. Identification and molecular genetic analysis of replication functions of the bacteriocinogenic plasmid pIP404 from Clostridium perfringens. Plasmid 1988, 19, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Girbal, L.; Mortier-Barrière, I.; Raynaud, F.; Rouanet, C.; Croux, C.; Soucaille, P. Development of a sensitive gene expression reporter system and an inducible promoter-repressor system for Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 4985–4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Graves, M.C.; Mullenbach, G.T.; Rabinowitz, J.C. Cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the Clostridium pasteurianum ferredoxin gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 1653–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Demain, A.L.; Gerson, D.F.; Fang, A. Effective levels of tetanus toxin can be made in a production medium totally lacking both animal (e.g., brain heart infusion) and dairy proteins or digests (e.g., casein hydrolysates). Vaccine 2005, 23, 5420–5423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Demain, A.L.; George, S.; Kole, M.; Gerson, D.F.; Fang, A. Tetanus toxin production in soy-based medium: Nutritional studies and scale-up into small fermentors. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 635–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Demain, A.L.; Gerson, D.F.; Kole, M.; Fang, A. The role of reduced iron powder in the fermentative production of tetanus toxin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 73, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Popoff, M.R.; Brüggemann, H. Regulatory Networks Controlling Neurotoxin Synthesis in Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium tetani. Toxins 2022, 14, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pennings, J.L.A.; Abachin, E.; Esson, R.; Hodemaekers, H.; Francotte, A.; Claude, J.B.; Vanhee, C.; Uhlrich, S.; Vandebriel, R.J. Regulation of Clostridium tetani Neurotoxin Expression by Culture Conditions. Toxins 2022, 14, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bradshaw, M.; Marshall, K.M.; Heap, J.T.; Tepp, W.H.; Minton, N.P.; Johnson, E.A. Construction of a nontoxigenic Clostridium botulinum strain for food challenge studies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bradshaw, M.; Tepp, W.H.; Whitemarsh, R.C.; Pellett, S.; Johnson, E.A. Holotoxin Activity of Botulinum Neurotoxin Subtype A4 Originating from a Nontoxigenic Clostridium botulinum Expression System. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 7415–7422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chen, F.; Kuziemko, G.M.; Amersdorfer, P.; Wong, C.; Marks, J.D.; Stevens, R.C. Antibody mapping to domains of botulinum neurotoxin serotype A in the complexed and uncomplexed forms. Infect. Immun. 1997, 65, 1626–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ohishi, I.; Sugii, S.; Sakaguchi, G. Oral toxicities of Clostridium botulinum toxins in response to molecular size. Infect. Immun. 1977, 16, 107–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mueller, J.H.; Miller, P.A. Variable factors influencing the production of tetanus toxin. J. Bacteriol. 1954, 67, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ingle, P.; Groothuis, D.; Rowe, P.; Huang, H.; Cockayne, A.; Kuehne, S.A.; Jiang, W.; Gu, Y.; Humphreys, C.M.; Minton, N.P. Generation of a fully erythromycin-sensitive strain of Clostridioides difficile using a novel CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Licona-Cassani, C.; Steen, J.A.; Zaragoza, N.E.; Moonen, G.; Moutafis, G.; Hodson, M.P.; Power, J.; Nielsen, L.K.; Marcellin, E. Tetanus toxin production is triggered by the transition from amino acid consumption to peptides. Anaerobe 2016, 41, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chung, Y.-J.; Jung, M.-Y.; Lee, J.-A.; Kim, T.-Y.; Choe, Y.-K.; Kim, I.-H. Tetanus toxin production from Clostridium tetani, using a casein-based medium in a single-use bioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2016, 21, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fratelli, F.; Siquini, T.J.; Prado, S.M.; Higashi, H.G.; Converti, A.; de Carvalho, J.C. Effect of medium composition on the production of tetanus toxin by Clostridium tetani. Biotechnol. Prog. 2005, 21, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. de Marco, A. Strategies for successful recombinant expression of disulfide bond-dependent proteins in Escherichia coli. Microb. Cell Factories 2009, 8, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Viravathana, P.; Tepp, W.H.; Bradshaw, M.; Przedpelski, A.; Barbieri, J.T.; Pellett, S. Potency Evaluations of Recombinant Botulinum Neurotoxin A1 Mutants Designed to Reduce Toxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. C. tetani 454 and 19406 express stable, full-length rTeNT at levels exceeding that of a wild-type strain under the ferredoxin promoter.
Figure 1. C. tetani 454 and 19406 express stable, full-length rTeNT at levels exceeding that of a wild-type strain under the ferredoxin promoter.
Microorganisms 12 02611 g001
Figure 2. Full-length rBoNT/A1ERY is expressed by C. tetani 454 but is only partially proteolytically processed to its dichain form. (A) Western blots depict the stability of rBoNT/AERY over time when the expression strains are cultured in toxin production media (TPM). C. botulinum Hall A Hyper/tox-(82152-A1ERY) is known to strongly express stable BoNT/A and was therefore used as an expression control to compare against C. tetani 454 (82153-A1ERY). (B) Whole culture samples were collected at the noted times and either reduced with 100 mM DTT or left unreduced. The 50 ng purified BoNT/A1 was used as a loading control. The locations of the ~150 kDa holotoxin (HC + LC/A), the ~100 kDa heavy chain (HC/A), and the ~50 kDa light chain (LC/A) are indicated.
Figure 2. Full-length rBoNT/A1ERY is expressed by C. tetani 454 but is only partially proteolytically processed to its dichain form. (A) Western blots depict the stability of rBoNT/AERY over time when the expression strains are cultured in toxin production media (TPM). C. botulinum Hall A Hyper/tox-(82152-A1ERY) is known to strongly express stable BoNT/A and was therefore used as an expression control to compare against C. tetani 454 (82153-A1ERY). (B) Whole culture samples were collected at the noted times and either reduced with 100 mM DTT or left unreduced. The 50 ng purified BoNT/A1 was used as a loading control. The locations of the ~150 kDa holotoxin (HC + LC/A), the ~100 kDa heavy chain (HC/A), and the ~50 kDa light chain (LC/A) are indicated.
Microorganisms 12 02611 g002
Figure 3. Full-length rBoNT/A1ERY is expressed by C. tetani 454 in modified Mueller Miller media but degrades over time. (A) Western blots of C. botulinum Hall A hyper/tox- (83152-A1ERY) and C. tetani 454 (82153-A1ERY) cultured in modified Mueller Miller media (+0.5 g/L reduced iron powder). Whole culture samples were taken at 24 and 96 h and either reduced with 100 mM DTT or left unreduced. (B) Western blot of C. tetani 454 (82153-A1ERY) expression on modified Mueller Miller agar plates without the addition of reduced iron powder or any alternative iron source. Whole cell growth (WC) on the plate was resuspended at the indicated time points and centrifuged into cell pellet (pellet) and supernatant (SN). Then, 50 ng purified BoNT/A1 was loaded as a control. The locations of the ~150 kDa holotoxin (HC + LC/A), the ~100 kDa heavy chain (HC/A), and the ~50 kDa light chain (LC/A) are indicated.
Figure 3. Full-length rBoNT/A1ERY is expressed by C. tetani 454 in modified Mueller Miller media but degrades over time. (A) Western blots of C. botulinum Hall A hyper/tox- (83152-A1ERY) and C. tetani 454 (82153-A1ERY) cultured in modified Mueller Miller media (+0.5 g/L reduced iron powder). Whole culture samples were taken at 24 and 96 h and either reduced with 100 mM DTT or left unreduced. (B) Western blot of C. tetani 454 (82153-A1ERY) expression on modified Mueller Miller agar plates without the addition of reduced iron powder or any alternative iron source. Whole cell growth (WC) on the plate was resuspended at the indicated time points and centrifuged into cell pellet (pellet) and supernatant (SN). Then, 50 ng purified BoNT/A1 was loaded as a control. The locations of the ~150 kDa holotoxin (HC + LC/A), the ~100 kDa heavy chain (HC/A), and the ~50 kDa light chain (LC/A) are indicated.
Microorganisms 12 02611 g003
Figure 4. Comparative stability of clostridial neurotoxins in spent media under varying pH conditions. Static cultures of the atoxic strains C. tetani 454 (A,C) and C. botulinum LNT01 (B,D) were incubated at 37 °C for 96 h in either modified Mueller Miller media (supplemented with 0.5 g/L of reduced iron powder) or toxin production media (TPM). Culture supernatant was collected and pH adjusted to pH 5, 6, 7, and 8 via 1 M NaOH or 1 M HCl. The pH adjusted spent media, spent media with no pH adjustment, and media which had not supported bacterial growth (fresh media) were sterile filtered through a 0.22 uM PVDF membrane. Purified 150 kDa BoNT/A1 (A,B) or TeNT (C,D) were added to each sample, incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, and then analyzed via SDS-PAGE and Western blot. The ~150 kDa protein bands, indicating the amount of full-length toxin remaining, were analyzed via densitometry. The mean concentration (n = 3) of remaining holotoxin is represented as a percentage relative to the amount of toxin initially added to the sample.
Figure 4. Comparative stability of clostridial neurotoxins in spent media under varying pH conditions. Static cultures of the atoxic strains C. tetani 454 (A,C) and C. botulinum LNT01 (B,D) were incubated at 37 °C for 96 h in either modified Mueller Miller media (supplemented with 0.5 g/L of reduced iron powder) or toxin production media (TPM). Culture supernatant was collected and pH adjusted to pH 5, 6, 7, and 8 via 1 M NaOH or 1 M HCl. The pH adjusted spent media, spent media with no pH adjustment, and media which had not supported bacterial growth (fresh media) were sterile filtered through a 0.22 uM PVDF membrane. Purified 150 kDa BoNT/A1 (A,B) or TeNT (C,D) were added to each sample, incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, and then analyzed via SDS-PAGE and Western blot. The ~150 kDa protein bands, indicating the amount of full-length toxin remaining, were analyzed via densitometry. The mean concentration (n = 3) of remaining holotoxin is represented as a percentage relative to the amount of toxin initially added to the sample.
Microorganisms 12 02611 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gregg, B.M.; Gupta, S.; Tepp, W.H.; Pellett, S. Expression of Recombinant Clostridial Neurotoxin by C. tetani. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2611. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122611

AMA Style

Gregg BM, Gupta S, Tepp WH, Pellett S. Expression of Recombinant Clostridial Neurotoxin by C. tetani. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(12):2611. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122611

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gregg, Brieana M., Sonal Gupta, William H. Tepp, and Sabine Pellett. 2024. "Expression of Recombinant Clostridial Neurotoxin by C. tetani" Microorganisms 12, no. 12: 2611. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122611

APA Style

Gregg, B. M., Gupta, S., Tepp, W. H., & Pellett, S. (2024). Expression of Recombinant Clostridial Neurotoxin by C. tetani. Microorganisms, 12(12), 2611. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122611

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop