Whole-Genome Profiling of Endophytic Strain B.L.Ns.14 from Nigella sativa Reveals Potential for Agricultural Bioenhancement
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Sample and Bacterial Endophyte Isolation
2.2. Antifungal Activity
2.3. Plant Growth-Promoting Traits
2.4. Motile Ability and Biofilm Formation
2.5. Abiotic Stress Tolerance Assay
2.6. Antibiotic Susceptibility Trait
2.7. Plant Growth-Promoting Activity on A. thaliana Col-0 Seedlings In Vitro Under Saline and Non-Saline Conditions
2.8. Plant Growth-Promoting Activity on Tomato Seeds and Plants
2.9. Phylogenetic Recognition Based on 16S rRNA Sequence
2.10. Whole-Genome Sequencing
2.11. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Isolation of Endophytic Bacteria from Nigella sativa
3.2. Biocontrol Ability of Bacterial Endophyte B.L.Ns.14
3.3. Plant Growth Promotion and Colonization Ability of Bacterial Endophyte B.L.Ns.14
3.4. Tolerance in Abiotic Stresses
3.5. Antibiotic Susceptibility
3.6. Phylogenetic Recognition of the Bacterial Endophyte Strain B.L.Ns.14
3.7. Investigation of Secondary Metabolites Gene Clusters in the B.L.Ns.14 Genome
3.8. The Bacterial Endophyte Β.L.Ns.14 Strain Possesses Genes Involved in Biological Control, Plant Growth Promotion, Colonization, and Abiotic Stress Tolerance
3.9. The Β.L.Ns.14 Strain Was Able to Boost the Growth of the Model Plant A. thaliana Under Normal and Saline Conditions
3.10. The Β.L.Ns.14 Strain Beneficially Affected the Growth of Solanum lycopersicum var. Chondrokatsari Messinias
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bokhari, A.; Essack, M.; Lafi, F.F.; Andres-Barrao, C.; Jalal, R.; Alamoudi, S.; Razali, R.; Alzubaidy, H.; Shah, K.H.; Siddique, S.; et al. Bioprospecting desert plant Bacillus endophytic strains for their potential to enhance plant stress tolerance. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anand, U.; Pal, T.; Yadav, N.; Singh, V.K.; Tripathi, V.; Choudhary, K.K.; Shukla, A.K.; Sunita, K.; Kumar, A.; Bontempi, E.; et al. Current scenario and future prospects of endophytic microbes: Promising candidates for abiotic and biotic stress management for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Microb. Ecol. 2023, 86, 1455–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tripathi, A.; Pandey, P.; Tripathi, S.N.; Kalra, A. Perspectives and potential applications of endophytic microorganisms in cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 985429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suryanarayanan, T.S. The need to study the holobiome for gainful uses of endophytes. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2020, 34, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santoyo, G.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G.; del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, M.; Glick, B.R. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 183, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.; Chen, W.; Liu, S.; Wu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Qin, L.; Zhu, B. Beneficial relationships between endophytic bacteria and medicinal plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 646146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kandasamy, G.D.; Kathirvel, P. Insights into bacterial endophytic diversity and isolation with a focus on their potential applications—A review. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 266, 127256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mercado-Blanco, J. Life of microbes inside the plant. In Principles of Plant-Microbe Interactions: Life of Microbes Inside the Plant; Lugtenberg, B., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaturvedi, H.; Singh, V.; Gupta, G. Potential of bacterial endophytes as plant growth promoting factors. J. Plant Pathol. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, A.; Yadav, K. Exploring the potential of endophytes in agriculture: A minireview. Adv. Plants Agric. Res. 2017, 6, 00221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abhilash, P.C.; Dubey, R.K.; Tripathi, V.; Gupta, V.K.; Singh, H.B. Plant growth-promoting microorganisms for environmental sustainability. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 847–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, J.F.; Kingsley, K.L.; Zhang, Q.; Verma, R.; Obi, N.; Dvinskikh, S.; Elmore, M.T.; Verma, S.K.; Gond, S.K.; Kowalski, K.P. Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2558–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lugtenberg, B.J.; Chin-A-Woeng, T.F.; Bloemberg, G.V. Microbe–plant interactions: Principles and mechanisms. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2002, 81, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Saadony, M.T.; Saad, A.M.; Soliman, S.M.; Salem, H.M.; Ahmed, A.I.; Mahmood, M.; El-Tahan, A.M.; Ebrahim, A.A.M.; Abd El-Mageed, T.A.; Negm, S.H.; et al. Plant growth-promoting microorganisms as biocontrol agents of plant diseases: Mechanisms, challenges and future perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 923880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lata, R.; Chowdhury, S.; Gond, S.K.; White, J.F., Jr. Induction of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by endophytic microbes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 66, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Phurailatpam, L.; Mishra, S. Role of Plant Endophytes in Conferring Abiotic Stress Tolerance. In Plant Ecophysiology and Adaptation under Climate Change: Mechanisms and Perspectives II; Hasanuzzaman, M., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 603–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamran, M.; Imran, Q.M.; Ahmed, M.B.; Falak, N.; Khatoon, A.; Yun, B.-W. Endophyte-Mediated Stress Tolerance in Plants: A Sustainable Strategy to Enhance Resilience and Assist Crop Improvement. Cells 2022, 11, 3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lastochkina, O.; Garshina, D.; Allagulova, C.; Fedorova, K.; Koryakov, I.; Vladimirova, A. Application of Endophytic Bacillus subtilis and Salicylic Acid to Improve Wheat Growth and Tolerance under Combined Drought and Fusarium Root Rot Stresses. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etesami, H.; Jeong, B.R.; Glick, B.R. Potential use of Bacillus spp. as an effective biostimulant against abiotic stresses in crops—A review. Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 2023, 5, 100128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafi, J.; Tian, H.; Ji, M. Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: A review. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2017, 31, 446–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fira, D.; Dimkić, I.; Berić, T.; Lozo, J.; Stanković, S. Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species. J. Biotech. 2018, 285, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lopes, R.; Tsui, S.; Gonçalves, P.J.; de Queiroz, M.V. A look into a multifunctional toolbox: Endophytic Bacillus species provide broad and underexploited benefits for plants. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miljaković, D.; Marinković, J.; Balešević-Tubić, S. The Significance of Bacillus spp. in Disease Suppression and Growth Promotion of Field and Vegetable Crops. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rana, K.L.; Kour, D.; Yadav, A.N. Endophytic microbiomes: Biodiversity, ecological significance and biotechnological applications. Res. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 14, 142–162. [Google Scholar]
- Afzal, I.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Sikandar, S.; Shahzad, S. Plant beneficial endophytic bacteria: Mechanisms, diversity, host range and genetic determinants. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 221, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bulgari, D.; Casati, P.; Crepaldi, P.; Daffonchio, D.; Quaglino, F.; Brusetti, L.; Bianco, P.A. Restructuring of endophytic bacterial communities in grapevine yellows-diseased and recovered Vitis vinifera L. plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 5018–5022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bogas, A.C.; Ferreira, A.J.; Araújo, W.L.; Astolfi-Filho, S.; Kitajima, E.W.; Lacava, P.T.; Azevedo, J.L. Endophytic bacterial diversity in the phyllosphere of Amazon Paullinia cupana associated with asymptomatic and symptomatic anthracnose. Springerplus 2015, 4, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.D.; Nguyen, T.T.; Pham, M.N.; Duong, H.N.; Pham, T.T.; Nguyen, T.P.; Nguyen, P.-T.; Thi Nguyen, T.-U.; Nguyen, H.-H.; Nguyen, H.-T. Relationships between endophytic bacteria and medicinal plants on bioactive compounds production. Rhizosphere 2023, 27, 100720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cong, H.; Li, C.; Wu, J.; Li, L.; Jiang, J.; Cao, X. Cultivable Endophyte Resources in Medicinal Plants and Effects on Hosts. Life 2023, 13, 1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gopane, B.; Tchatchouang, C.K.; Regnier, T.; Ateba, C.N.; Manganyi, M.C. Community diversity and stress tolerance of culturable endophytic fungi from black seed (Nigella sativa L.). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 137, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shady, N.H.; Sobhy, S.K.; Mostafa, Y.A.; Yahia, R.; Glaeser, S.P.; Kämpfer, P.; El-Katatny, M.H.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Phytochemical analysis and anti-infective potential of fungal endophytes isolated from Nigella sativa seeds. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannan, M.A.; Rahman, M.A.; Sohag, A.A.M.; Uddin, M.J.; Dash, R.; Sikder, M.H.; Rahman, M.S.; Timalsina, B.; Munni, Y.A.; Sarker, P.P.; et al. Black Cumin (Nigella sativa L.): A Comprehensive Review on Phytochemistry, Health Benefits, Molecular Pharmacology, and Safety. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kusari, P.; Kusari, S.; Spiteller, M.; Kayser, O. Endophytic fungi harbored in Cannabis sativa L.: Diversity and potential as biocontrol agents against host plant-specific phytopathogens. Fungal Divers. 2012, 60, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamsal, K.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, Y.S.; Lee, Y.S. Application of rhizobacteria for plant growth promotion effect and biocontrol of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum acutatum on pepper. Mycobiology 2012, 40, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schwyn, B.; Neilands, J. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 160, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pikovskaya, R.I. Mobilization of Phosphorus in Soil Connection with the Vital Activity of Some Microbial Species. Microbiology 1948, 17, 362–370. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, R.S.; Ayyadurai, N.; Pandiaraja, P.; Reddy, A.V.; Venkateswarlu, Y.; Prakash, O.; Sakthivel, N. Characterization of antifungal metabolite produced by a new strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa PUPa3 that exhibits broad-spectrum antifungal activity and biofertilizing traits. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 98, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, S.J.; Kim, B.S. Biocontrol of Fusarium crown and root rot and promotion of growth of tomato by Paenibacillus strains isolated from soil. Mycobiology 2014, 42, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mobley, H.L.; Hausinger, R.P. Microbial ureases: Significance, regulation, and molecular characterization. Microbiol. Rev. 1989, 53, 85–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baysal, O.; Lai, D.; Xu, H.H.; Siragusa, M.; Calışkan, M.; Carimi, F.; da Silva, J.A.; Tör, M. A proteomic approach provides new insights into the control of soil-borne plant pathogens by Bacillus species. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Toole, G.A.; Kolter, R. Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: A genetic analysis. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 28, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauer, A.W.; Kirby, W.M.; Sherris, J.C.; Turck, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Tech. Bull. Regist. Med. Technol. 1966, 45, 493–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palacio-Rodríguez, R.; Coria-Arellano, J.L.; López-Bucio, J.; Sánchez-Salas, J.; Muro-Pérez, G.; Castañeda-Gaytán, G.; Sáenz-Mata, J. Halophilic rhizobacteria from Distichlis spicata promote growth and improve salt tolerance in heterologous plant hosts. Symbiosis 2017, 73, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asari, S.; Matzén, S.; Petersen, M.A.; Bejai, S.; Meijer, J. Multiple effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens volatile compounds: Plant growth promotion and growth inhibition of phytopathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weisburg, W.G.; Barns, S.M.; Pelletier, D.A.; Lane, D.J. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lefort, V.; Desper, R.; Gascuel, O. FastME 2.0: A comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 2798–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Auch, A.F.; Klenk, H.P.; Göker, M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khurana, H.; Sharma, M.; Verma, H.; Lopes, B.S.; Lal, R.; Negi, R.K. Genomic insights into the phylogeny of Bacillus strains and elucidation of their secondary metabolic potential. Genomics 2020, 112, 3191–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Dou, G.; Ma, Y. Potential of endophytes from medicinal plants for biocontrol and plant growth promotion. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2016, 82, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogino, P.C.; de las Mercedes Oliva, M.; Sorroche, F.G.; Giordano, W. The role of bacterial biofilms and surface components in plant-bacterial associations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 15838–15859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venieraki, A.; Tsalgatidou, P.C.; Georgakopoulos, D.G.; Dimou, M.; Katinakis, P. Swarming motility in plant-associated bacteria. Hell. Plant Prot. J. 2016, 9, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.H.; Guo, J.W.; Salam, N.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.G.; Han, J.; Mohamad, O.A.; Li, W.J. Culturable endophytic bacteria associated with medicinal plant Ferula songorica: Molecular phylogeny, distribution and screening for industrially important traits. 3 Biotech. 2016, 6, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hazarika, S.N.; Saikia, K.; Borah, A.; Thakur, D. Prospecting endophytic bacteria endowed with plant growth promoting potential isolated from Camellia sinensis. Front. Microbial. 2021, 12, 738058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rat, A.; Naranjo, H.D.; Krigas, N.; Grigoriadou, K.; Maloupa, E.; Alonso, A.V.; Schneider, C.; Papageorgiou, V.P.; Assimopoulou, A.N.; Tsafantakis, N.; et al. Endophytic bacteria from the roots of the medicinal plant Alkanna tinctoria Tausch (Boraginaceae): Exploration of plant growth promoting properties and potential role in the production of plant secondary metabolites. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 633488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumari, P.; Deepa, N.; Trivedi, P.K.; Singh, B.K.; Srivastava, V.; Singh, A. Plants and endophytes interaction: A “secret wedlock” for sustainable biosynthesis of pharmaceutically important secondary metabolites. Microb. Cell Fact. 2023, 22, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dunlap, C.A. Taxonomy of registered Bacillus spp. strains used as plant pathogen antagonists. Biol. Control 2019, 134, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhou, H.; Zhao, M.; Zheng, H. Whole-genome analysis revealed the growth-promoting and biological control mechanism of the endophytic bacterial strain Bacillus halotolerans Q2H2, with strong antagonistic activity in potato plants. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 3, 1287921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Albarano, L.; Esposito, R.; Ruocco, N.; Costantini, M. Genome mining as new challenge in natural products discovery. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bauman, K.D.; Butler, K.S.; Moore, B.S.; Chekan, J.R. Genome mining methods to discover bioactive natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 2100–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baltz, R.H. Natural product drug discovery in the genomic era: Realities, conjectures, misconceptions, and opportunities. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 46, 281–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandra, A.; Chandra, P.; Tripathi, P. Whole genome sequence insight of two plant growth-promoting bacteria (B. subtilis BS87 and B. megaterium BM89) isolated and characterized from sugarcane rhizosphere depicting better crop yield potentiality. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 247, 126733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertê, R.; Teixeira, G.M.; de Oliveira, J.P.; Nicoletto, M.L.A.; da Silva, D.V.; de Godoy, G.G.; Sanches, D.S.; de Resende, J.T.V.; Pereira, U.d.P.; Nunes da Rocha, U.; et al. Genome Mining Reveals High Biosynthetic Potential of Biocontrol Agent Bacillus velezensis B.BV10. Genes 2022, 13, 1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Popp, P.F.; Benjdia, A.; Strahl, H.; Berteau, O.; Mascher, T. The epipeptide YydF intrinsically triggers the cell envelope stress response of Bacillus subtilis and causes severe membrane perturbations. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popp, P.F.; Friebel, L.; Benjdia, A.; Guillot, A.; Berteau, O.; Mascher, T. The epipeptide biosynthesis locus epeXEPAB is widely distributed in Firmicutes and triggers intrinsic cell envelope stress. Microb. Physiol. 2021, 31, 306–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kalamara, M.; Abbott, J.; Sukhodub, T.; MacPhee, C.; Stanley-Wall, N.R. The putative role of the epipeptide EpeX in Bacillus subtilis intra-species competition. Microbiology 2023, 169, 001344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Song, C.; Yi, Y.; Kuipers, O.P. Characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria from perennial ryegrass and genome mining of novel antimicrobial gene clusters. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iqbal, S.; Begum, F.; Rabaan, A.A.; Aljeldah, M.; Al Shammari, B.R.; Alawfi, A.; Alshengeti, A.; Sulaiman, T.; Khan, A. Classification and Multifaceted Potential of Secondary Metabolites Produced by Bacillus subtilis Group: A Comprehensive Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thennarasu, S.; Lee, D.K.; Poon, A.; Kawulka, K.E.; Vederas, J.C.; Ramamoorthy, A. Membrane permeabilization, orientation, and antimicrobial mechanism of subtilosin A. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2005, 137, 38–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, G.; Hehn, R.; Zuber, P. Mutational analysis of the sbo-alb locus of Bacillus subtilis: Identification of genes required for subtilosin production and immunity. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 3266–3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, T.; Geng, H.; Miyyapuram, V.R.; Sit, C.S.; Vederas, J.C.; Nakano, M.M. Isolation of a variant of subtilosin A with hemolytic activity. J. Bact. 2009, 191, 5690–5696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varella Coelho, M.L.; de Souza Duarte, A.F.; do Carmo de Freire Bastos, M. Bacterial labionin-containing peptides and sactibiotics: Unusual types of antimicrobial peptides with potential use in clinical settings (a review). Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 1177–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, X.; Kuipers, O.P. Identification and classification of known and putative antimicrobial compounds produced by a wide variety of Bacillales species. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.-A.; Song, J.-S.; Kim, P.I.; Kim, D.-H.; Kim, Y. Bacillus velezensis TSA32-1 as a Promising Agent for Biocontrol of Plant Pathogenic Fungi. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fazle Rabbee, M.; Baek, K.H. Antimicrobial activities of lipopeptides and polyketides of Bacillus velezensis for agricultural applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 4973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimopoulou, A.; Theologidis, I.; Liebmann, B.; Kalantidis, K.; Vassilakos, N.; Skandalis, N. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MBI600 differentially induces tomato defense signaling pathways depending on plant part and dose of application. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Islam, T.; Rabbee, M.F.; Choi, J.; Baek, K.-H. Biosynthesis, Molecular Regulation, and Application of Bacilysin Produced by Bacillus Species. Metabolites 2022, 12, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ongena, M.; Jacques, P. Bacillus lipopeptides: Versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008, 16, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ajuna, H.B.; Lim, H.I.; Moon, J.H.; Won, S.J.; Choub, V.; Choi, S.I.; Yun, J.-Y.; Ahn, Y.S. The prospect of antimicrobial peptides from Bacillus species with biological control potential against insect pests and diseases of economic importance in agriculture, forestry and fruit tree production. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2024, 38, 2312115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoff, G.; Arguelles Arias, A.; Boubsi, F.; Pršić, J.; Meyer, T.; Ibrahim, H.M.; Steels, S.; Luzuriaga, P.; Legras, A.; Franzil, L.; et al. Surfactin stimulated by pectin molecular patterns and root exudates acts as a key driver of the Bacillus-plant mutualistic interaction. MBio 2021, 12, e01774-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heo, J.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, J.S.; Hong, S.B.; Kwon, S.W. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus halotolerans F41-3 isolated from wild flower in Korea. Korean J. Microbiol. 2019, 55, 306–308. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X.; Wu, H.; Wang, R.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, Q.; Farzand, A.; Yang, X.; Semenov, M.; Borriss, R.; et al. Genomic Features and Molecular Function of a Novel Stress-Tolerant Bacillus halotolerans Strain Isolated from an Extreme Environment. Biology 2021, 10, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cochrane, S.A.; Vederas, J.C. Lipopeptides from Bacillus and Paenibacillus spp.: A gold mine of antibiotic candidates. Med. Res. Rev. 2016, 36, 4–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Horak, I.; Engelbrecht, G.; van Rensburg, P.J.J.; Claassens, S. Microbial metabolomics: Essential definitions and the importance of cultivation conditions for utilizing Bacillus species as bionematicides. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 326–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thomloudi, E.-E.; Tsalgatidou, P.C.; Baira, E.; Papadimitriou, K.; Venieraki, A.; Katinakis, P. Genomic and Metabolomic Insights into Secondary Metabolites of the Novel Bacillus halotolerans Hil4, an Endophyte with Promising Antagonistic Activity against Gray Mold and Plant Growth Promoting Potential. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsalgatidou, P.C.; Thomloudi, E.-E.; Baira, E.; Papadimitriou, K.; Skagia, A.; Venieraki, A.; Katinakis, P. Integrated Genomic and Metabolomic Analysis Illuminates Key Secreted Metabolites Produced by the Novel Endophyte Bacillus halotolerans Cal.l.30 Involved in Diverse Biological Control Activities. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsalgatidou, P.C.; Thomloudi, E.-E.; Nifakos, K.; Delis, C.; Venieraki, A.; Katinakis, P. Calendula officinalis—A Great Source of Plant Growth Promoting Endophytic Bacteria (PGPEB) and Biological Control Agents (BCA). Microorganisms 2023, 11, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caulier, S.; Nannan, C.; Gillis, A.; Licciardi, F.; Bragard, C.; Mahillon, J. Overview of the antimicrobial compounds produced by members of the Bacillus subtilis group. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 435128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tran, C.; Cock, I.E.; Chen, X.; Feng, Y. Antimicrobial Bacillus: Metabolites and Their Mode of Action. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borisova, S.A.; Circello, B.T.; Zhang, J.K.; van der Donk, W.A.; Metcalf, W.W. Biosynthesis of rhizocticins, antifungal phosphonate oligopeptides produced by Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633. Chem. Biol. 2010, 17, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, D.J.; Lee, J.H.; Song, Y.S.; Park, R.D.; Jung, W.J. Expression patterns of chitinase and chitosanase produced from Bacillus cereus in suppression of phytopathogen. Microb. Pathog. 2014, 73, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Malerba, M.; Cerana, R. Chitosan effects on plant systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carro, L.; Menéndez, E. Knock, knock-let the bacteria in: Enzymatic potential of plant associated bacteria. In Molecular Aspects of Plant Beneficial Microbes in Agriculture; Sharma, V., Salwan, R., Al-Ani, L.K.T., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 169–178. [Google Scholar]
- Ayaz, M.; Ali, Q.; Jiang, Q.; Wang, R.; Wang, Z.; Mu, G.; Khan, S.A.; Khan, A.R.; Manghwar, H.; Wu, H.; et al. Salt Tolerant Bacillus Strains Improve Plant Growth Traits and Regulation of Phytohormones in Wheat under Salinity Stress. Plants 2022, 11, 2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saum, S.H.; Sydow, J.F.; Palm, P.; Pfeiffer, F.; Oesterhelt, D.; Muüller, V. Biochemical and molecular characterization of the biosynthesis of glutamine and glutamate, two major compatible solutes in the moderately halophilic bacterium Halobacillus halophilus. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 6808–6815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoffmann, T.; Bleisteiner, M.; Sappa, P.K.; Steil, L.; Mäder, U.; Völker, U.; Bremer, E. Synthesis of the compatible solute proline by Bacillus subtilis: Point mutations rendering the osmotically controlled proHJ promoter hyperactive. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 3700–3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoffmann, T.; Wensing, A.; Brosius, M.; Steil, L.; Völker, U.; Bremer, E. Osmotic control of opuA expression in Bacillus subtilis and its modulation in response to intracellular glycine betaine and proline pools. J. Bact. 2013, 195, 510–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goswami, G.; Hazarika, D.J.; Chowdhury, N.; Bora, S.S.; Sarmah, U.; Naorem, R.S.; Boro, R.C.; Barooah, M. Proline confers acid stress tolerance to Bacillus megaterium G18. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sornchuer, P.; Saninjuk, K.; Tingpej, P. Whole genome sequence analyses of thermotolerant Bacillus sp. isolates from food. Genom. Inform. 2023, 21, e35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parida, A.K.; Das, A.B. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2005, 60, 324–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaiwen, G.; Zisong, X.; Yuze, H.; Qi, S.; Yue, W.; Yanhui, C.; Jiechen, W.; Wei, L.; Huihui, Z. Effects of salt concentration, pH, and their interaction on plant growth, nutrient uptake, and photochemistry of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) leaves. Plant Signal Behav. 2020, 15, 1832373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Balasubramaniam, T.; Shen, G.; Esmaeili, N.; Zhang, H. Plants’ response mechanisms to salinity stress. Plants 2023, 12, 2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, P.; Mishra, J.; Arora, N.K. Plant growth promoting bacteria for combating salinity stress in plants–Recent developments and prospects: A review. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 252, 126861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayuso-Calles, M.; Flores-Félix, J.D.; Rivas, R. Overview of the role of rhizobacteria in plant salt stress tolerance. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrivastava, P.; Kumar, R. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, M.A.; Hamayun, M.; Asaf, S.; Khan, M.; Yun, B.W.; Kang, S.M.; Lee, I.J. Rhizospheric Bacillus spp. rescues plant growth under salinity stress via regulating gene expression, endogenous hormones, and antioxidant system of Oryza sativa L. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 665590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Kim, M.S.; Sun, Y.; Dowd, S.E.; Shi, H.; Paré, P.W. Soil bacteria confer plant salt tolerance by tissue-specific regulation of the sodium transporter HKT1. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 737–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yasin, N.A.; Akram, W.; Khan, W.U.; Ahmad, S.R.; Ahmad, A.; Ali, A. Halotolerant plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria modulate gene expression and osmolyte production to improve salinity tolerance and growth in Capsicum annum L. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 23236–23250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, B.; Wang, X.; Saleem, M.H.; Azeem, M.A.; Afridi, M.S.; Nadeem, M.; Ghazal, M.; Batool, T.; Qayyum, A.; Alatawi, A.; et al. Bacillus mycoides PM35 Reinforces Photosynthetic Efficiency, Antioxidant Defense, Expression of Stress-Responsive Genes, and Ameliorates the Effects of Salinity Stress in Maize. Life 2022, 12, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baek, D.; Rokibuzzaman, M.; Khan, A.; Kim, M.C.; Park, H.J.; Yun, D.J.; Chung, Y.R. Plant-growth promoting Bacillus oryzicola YC7007 modulates stress-response gene expression and provides protection from salt stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 497302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amna; Din, B.U.; Sarfraz, S.; Xia, Y.; Kamran, M.A.; Javed, M.T.; Sultan, T.; Hussain Munis, M.F.; Chaudhary, H.J. Mechanistic elucidation of germination potential and growth of wheat inoculated with exopolysaccharide and ACC- deaminase producing Bacillus strains under induced salinity stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 15, 109466. [CrossRef]
- Bhagat, N.; Raghav, M.; Dubey, S.; Bedi, N. Bacterial Exopolysaccharides: Insight into Their Role in Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 28, 1045–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sunita, K.; Mishra, I.; Mishra, J.; Prakash, J.; Arora, N.K. Secondary metabolites from halotolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for ameliorating salinity stress in plants. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 567768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Costa, O.Y.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Kuramae, E.E. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: Ecological function and impact on soil aggregation. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramasamy, K.P.; Mahawar, L. Coping with salt stress-interaction of halotolerant bacteria in crop plants: A mini review. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1077561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, S.; Hao, H.; Lu, X.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, Z.; Wang, R. Transcriptome profiling of genes involved in induced systemic salt tolerance conferred by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci. Rep. 2017, 13, 10795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Tian, Z.; Xi, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, S.; He, M.; Chen, Y.; Guo, Y. Improvement of salt tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings inoculated with endophytic Bacillus cereus KP120. J. Plant Interact. 2022, 17, 884–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Li, K.; Li, X. Auxin redistribution modulates plastic development of root system architecture under salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1637–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smolko, A.; Bauer, N.; Pavlović, I.; Pěnčík, A.; Novák, O.; Salopek-Sondi, B. Altered root growth, auxin metabolism and distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to salt and osmotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cackett, L.; Cannistraci, C.V.; Meier, S.; Ferrandi, P.; Pěnčík, A.; Gehring, C.; Novák, O.; Ingle, R.A.; Donaldson, L. Salt-specific gene expression reveals elevated auxin levels in Arabidopsis thaliana plants grown under saline conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 804716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Tian, Y.; Jia, M.; Lu, X.; Yue, L.; Zhao, X.; Jin, W.; Wang, R. Induction of Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana by Volatiles From Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 via the Jasmonic Acid Signaling Pathway. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 12, 562934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cappellari, L.D.R.; Banchio, E. Microbial volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GB03 ameliorate the effects of salt stress in Mentha piperita principally through acetoin emission. Journal of plant growth regulation. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 764–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, S.; Jiang, Y.; Song, S.; Huang, J.; Ling, N.; Xu, Y.; Shen, Q. Two Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains isolated using the competitive tomato root enrichment method and their effects on suppressing Ralstonia solanacearum and promoting tomato plant growth. Crop Prot. 2013, 43, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luziatelli, F.; Ficca, A.G.; Colla, G.; Baldassarre Švecová, E.; Ruzzi, M. Foliar application of vegetal-derived bioactive compounds stimulates the growth of beneficial bacteria and enhances microbiome biodiversity in lettuce. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Efthimiadou, A.; Katsenios, N.; Chanioti, S.; Giannoglou, M.; Djordjevic, N.; Katsaros, G. Effect of foliar and soil application of plant growth promoting bacteria on growth, physiology, yield and seed quality of maize under Mediterranean conditions. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lopes, M.J.D.S.; Dias-Filho, M.B.; Gurgel, E.S.C. Successful plant growth-promoting microbes: Inoculation methods and abiotic factors. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 606454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, A.; Turgay, O.C.; Farooq, M.; Hayat, R. Seed biopriming with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: A review. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fiodor, A.; Ajijah, N.; Dziewit, L.; Pranaw, K. Biopriming of seed with plant growth-promoting bacteria for improved germination and seedling growth. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1142966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hadj Brahim, A.; Ben Ali, M.; Daoud, L.; Jlidi, M.; Akremi, I.; Hmani, H.; Feto, N.A.; Ben Ali, M. Biopriming of Durum Wheat Seeds with Endophytic Diazotrophic Bacteria Enhances Tolerance to Fusarium Head Blight and Salinity. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devi, N.O.; Devi, R.T.; Rajesh, T.; Thakuria, D.; Ningthoujam, K.; Debbarma, M.; Hajong, M. Evaluation of endophytic Bacillus spp. isolates from tomato roots on seed germination and seedling vigour of tomato. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2020, 9, 2402–2406. [Google Scholar]
- Lastochkina, O.; Garshina, D.; Ivanov, S.; Yuldashev, R.; Khafizova, R.; Allagulova, C.; Fedorova, K.; Avalbaev, A.; Maslennikova, D.; Bosacchi, M. Seed Priming with Endophytic Bacillus subtilis Modulates Physiological Responses of Two Different Triticum aestivum L. Cultivars under Drought Stress. Plants 2020, 9, 1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabra Cendales, T.; Rodríguez González, C.A.; Villota Cuásquer, C.P.; Tapasco Alzate, O.A.; Hernández Rodríguez, A. Bacillus effect on the germination and growth of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L). Acta Biol. Colomb. 2017, 22, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myresiotis, C.K.; Karaoglanidis, G.S.; Vryzas, Z.; Papadopoulou-Mourkidou, E. Evaluation of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria, acibenzolar-S-methyl and hymexazol for integrated control of Fusarium crown and root rot on tomato. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yao, A.V.; Bochow, H.; Karimov, S.; Boturov, U.; Sanginboy, S.; Sharipov, K. Effect of FZB 24 Bacillus subtilis as a biofertilizer on cotton yields in field tests. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2006, 39, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kloepper, J.W.; Ryu, C.M.; Zhang, S. Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 2004, 94, 1259–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramyabharathi, S.A.; Meena, B.; Raguchander, T. Induction of chitinase and β-1, 3-glucanase PR proteins in tomato through liquid formulated Bacillus subtilis EPCO 16 against Fusarium wilt. J. Today’s Biol. Sci. Res. Rev. 2020, 1, 50–60. [Google Scholar]
- Qin, L.; Tian, P.; Cui, Q.; Hu, S.; Jian, W.; Xie, C.; Yang, X.; Shen, H. Bacillus circulans GN03 alters the microbiota, promotes cotton seedling growth and disease resistance, and increases the expression of phytohormone synthesis and disease resistance-related genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 644597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Samaras, A.; Roumeliotis, E.; Ntasiou, P.; Karaoglanidis, G. Bacillus subtilis MBI600 Promotes Growth of Tomato Plants and Induces Systemic Resistance Contributing to the Control of Soilborne Pathogens. Plants 2021, 10, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Solano-Alvarez, N.; Valencia-Hernández, J.A.; Rico-García, E.; Torres-Pacheco, I.; Ocampo-Velázquez, R.V.; Escamilla-Silva, E.M.; Romero-García, A.L.; Alpuche-Solís, Á.G.; Guevara-González, R.G. A Novel Isolate of Bacillus cereus Promotes Growth in Tomato and Inhibits Clavibacter michiganensis Infection under Greenhouse Conditions. Plants 2021, 10, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vardharajula, S.; Zulfikar Ali, S.; Grover, M.; Reddy, G.; Bandi, V. Drought-tolerant plant growth promoting Bacillus spp.: Effect on growth, osmolytes, and antioxidant status of maize under drought stress. J. Plant Interact. 2011, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Wu, G.; Veronican Njeri, K.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, R. Induced maize salt tolerance by rhizosphere inoculation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. Physiol. Plant 2016, 158, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, Y.G.; Mun, B.G.; Kang, S.M.; Hussain, A.; Shahzad, R.; Seo, C.W.; Kim, A.Y.; Lee, S.U.; Oh, K.Y.; Lee, D.Y.; et al. Bacillus aryabhattai SRB02 tolerates oxidative and nitrosative stress and promotes the growth of soybean by modulating the production of phytohormones. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Batool, T.; Ali, S.; Seleiman, M.F.; Naveed, N.H.; Ali, A.; Ahmed, K.; Abid, M.; Rizwan, M.; Shahid, M.R.; Alotaibi, M.; et al. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria alleviates drought stress in potato in response to suppressive oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activities. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patel, M.; Islam, S.; Husain, F.M.; Yadav, V.K.; Park, H.K.; Yadav, K.K.; Bagatharia, S.; Joshi, M.; Jeon, B.H.; Patel, A. Bacillus subtilis ER-08, a multifunctional plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, promotes the growth of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) plants under salt and drought stress. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1208743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mycelial Radius (cm) 1 | Index Inhibition (%) 1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Pathogens | Control | Dual Culture | |
R. solani | 3.39 ± 0.76 | 3.09 ± 0.49 **** | 64.95 ± 5.58 |
C. acutatum | 3.55 ± 0.44 | 1.68 ± 0.19 **** | 52.82 ± 5.49 |
V. dahliae | 2.74 ± 0.19 | 1.33 ± 0.15 **** | 51.58 ± 5.57 |
FORL | 3.09 ± 0.49 | 0.98 ± 0.17 **** | 68.34 ± 5.60 |
orthoANI% | dDDH% | |
---|---|---|
Β.L.Ns.14 | 100 | 100 |
B. halotolerans strain PK3_4 (CP026032.1) | 97.83 | 80.8 |
B. halotolerans strain ZB201702 (CP029364.1) | 97.93 | 81.8 |
B. halotolerans strain F41-3 (CP041357.1) | 97.9 | 81.6 |
B. halotolerans strain KKD1 (CP054584.1) | 97.88 | 81.7 |
B. halotolerans strain MBH1 (CP070976.1) | 97.85 | 80.9 |
B. halotolerans strain HMB20199 (CP110264.1) | 99.18 | 93 |
Bacillus axarquiensis strain NRRL B-41617 T (NZ_LPVD00000000.1) * | 99.08 | 92.7 |
Bacillus halotolerans strain ATCC 25096 T (NZ_LPVF01000014.1) | 99.1 | 94.1 |
Bacillus malacitensis strain NRRL B-41618 T (NZ_LPVE00000000.1) * | 99.1 | 91.9 |
Region | MIBIG | Locus | Most Similar Known Cluster | Predicted Biosynthetic Gene Clusters | Metabolite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1 | BGC0000602 (100%) | 133,397–155,008 | sbo-alb | Sactipeptide | Subtilosin A |
1.2 | BGC0000888 (100%) | 166,972–208,390 | bac | Other | Bacilycin |
1.3 | - | 442,018–463,719 | - | RiPP | Epipeptide |
3.1 | BGC0000926 (100%) | 36,618–57,033 | rhi | Phosphonate | Rhizocticin A |
3.2 | BGC0000433 (86%) | 194.176–259,571 | srf | NRPS | Surfactin |
4.1 | - | 205,412–226,218 | - | Terpene | - |
4.2 | BGC0001089 (100%) | 825,111–940,119 | bae | NRPS, transAT-PKS | Bacillaene |
4.3 | BGC0001103 (100%) | 995,601–1,125,433 | myc | NRPS, transAT-PKS | Mycosubtilin * |
BGC0001095 (100%) | fen | NRPS | Fengycin ** | ||
6.1 | - | 14,331–36,229 | - | Terpene | - |
6.2 | BGC0000867 (5%) | 91,630–132,727 | - | T3PKS | Laterocidine |
9.1 | BGC0000309 (100%) | 50,663–102,437 | dhb | NRPS | Bacillibactin |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Douka, D.; Spantidos, T.-N.; Tsalgatidou, P.C.; Katinakis, P.; Venieraki, A. Whole-Genome Profiling of Endophytic Strain B.L.Ns.14 from Nigella sativa Reveals Potential for Agricultural Bioenhancement. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2604. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122604
Douka D, Spantidos T-N, Tsalgatidou PC, Katinakis P, Venieraki A. Whole-Genome Profiling of Endophytic Strain B.L.Ns.14 from Nigella sativa Reveals Potential for Agricultural Bioenhancement. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(12):2604. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122604
Chicago/Turabian StyleDouka, Dimitra, Tasos-Nektarios Spantidos, Polina C. Tsalgatidou, Panagiotis Katinakis, and Anastasia Venieraki. 2024. "Whole-Genome Profiling of Endophytic Strain B.L.Ns.14 from Nigella sativa Reveals Potential for Agricultural Bioenhancement" Microorganisms 12, no. 12: 2604. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122604
APA StyleDouka, D., Spantidos, T.-N., Tsalgatidou, P. C., Katinakis, P., & Venieraki, A. (2024). Whole-Genome Profiling of Endophytic Strain B.L.Ns.14 from Nigella sativa Reveals Potential for Agricultural Bioenhancement. Microorganisms, 12(12), 2604. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122604