Next Article in Journal
Enriched Aptamer Libraries in Fluorescence-Based Assays for Rikenella microfusus-Specific Gut Microbiome Analyses
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Fruit and Berry Pomaces on the Growth Dynamics of Microorganisms and Sensory Properties of Marinated Rainbow Trout
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Environmental Sub-Inhibitory Concentrations of Antibiotics, Heavy Metals, and Biocides on the Emergence of Tolerance and Effects on the Mutant Selection Window in E. coli
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antiherpetic Activity of Taurisolo®, a Grape Pomace Polyphenolic Extract
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mediterranean Plants with Antimicrobial Activity against Staphylococcus aureus, a Meta-Analysis for Green Veterinary Pharmacology Applications

1
Institute of Research for Food Safety & Health (IRC-FSH), Department of Health Sciences, “Magna Græcia University” of Catanzaro, Campus Universitario “Salvatore Venuta” Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
2
Department of Health Sciences, “Magna Græcia University” of Catanzaro, Campus Universitario “Salvatore Venuta” Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
3
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Messina, 98166 Messina, Italy
4
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Nation-Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Machining and Safety of Livestock and Poultry Products, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
5
Department of Bioscience and Technology for Food Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, Via Balzarini 1, 64100 Teramo, Italy
6
CISVetSUA, University of Catanzaro, Campus Universitario “Salvatore Venuta” Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally (first author).
These authors contributed equally (last author).
Microorganisms 2023, 11(9), 2264; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092264
Submission received: 4 August 2023 / Revised: 6 September 2023 / Accepted: 7 September 2023 / Published: 9 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Properties of Plants-Derived Natural Products)

Abstract

:
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a global health crisis, necessitating the search for innovative strategies to combat infectious diseases. The unique biodiversity of Italian flora offers a treasure trove of plant species and their associated phytochemicals, which hold immense potential as a solution to address AMR. By investigating the antimicrobial properties of Italian flora and their phytochemical constituents, this study aims to shed light on the potential of phyto-complexes as a valuable resource for developing novel or supportive antimicrobial agents useful for animal production.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance has become a pressing global challenge, rendering conventional antibiotics less effective and diminishing our ability to combat infectious diseases. The urgency to counter this crisis has led to a growing interest in alternative sources, including plant-derived compounds. Italian flora, with its wealth of botanical species, represents an untapped source of diverse phytochemicals that may possess potent antimicrobial properties [1].
The Italian flora exhibits remarkable heterogeneity due to the country’s diverse geography, climate, and historical influences. Italy is home to a wide range of ecosystems, including the Alpine region in the north, the Apennine Mountains that run through the center of the country, coastal areas, wetlands, and Mediterranean islands. This diverse landscape contributes to the rich and varied plant life found throughout Italy [2].
The central regions are dominated by the Apennine Mountains, which harbor a unique array of flora. The Apennines support a mix of deciduous and evergreen forests, including oak, beech, chestnut, and pine. The Mediterranean influence becomes more pronounced in the central and southern parts of the country, with characteristic maquis shrubland, macchia, and coastal vegetation. Plants such as rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), lavender (Lavandula spp.), myrtle (Myrtus communis), and various aromatic herbs thrive in these Mediterranean ecosystems [3].
Coastal regions of Italy boast their own distinct flora, shaped by the proximity to the sea and the specific microclimates along the shoreline. Coastal dunes and wetlands are home to salt-tolerant plants, such as sea lavender (Limonium spp.), sea holly (Eryngium spp.), and various species of halophytes adapted to saline conditions. The wetlands of the Po Delta, Venice Lagoon, and other marshy areas support a diverse range of aquatic and semi-aquatic plants, including reeds, cattails, and water lilies [4].
The islands of Sicily and Sardinia, located in the Mediterranean Sea, have their own unique flora due to their isolation and climatic conditions. These islands exhibit a blend of Mediterranean and North African influences, resulting in a diverse mix of plant species. Iconic plants like the Sicilian fir (Abies nebrodensis), dwarf palm (Chamaerops humilis), and Sardinian broom (Genista corsica) can be found in these regions [5].
Phyto-complexes derived from Italian flora offer a complex mixture of bioactive compounds, including alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenes, and phenolics. These phytochemicals have evolved as part of plants’ defense mechanisms against microbial infections and environmental stresses, providing a wide array of chemical structures and mechanisms of action. By harnessing the antimicrobial potential of these phyto-complexes, it may be possible to address the challenge of antimicrobial resistance through novel therapeutic interventions.
Such investigations have revealed promising outcomes, demonstrating the ability of phytochemicals derived from Italian plants to inhibit the growth of various pathogenic microorganisms, including multidrug-resistant strains. These bioactive compounds can target essential microbial processes, disrupt cellular structures, and interfere with virulence factors, thus reducing the risk of resistance development [1].
Various intervention methods can be employed to prevent the spread and dangers associated with antimicrobial resistance. Certainly, the first valuable approach is tied to the research for early diagnosis through several methods, such as immunoproteomics or high throughput mass spectrometry techniques [6,7,8,9]. Other approaches involve isolating and removing animals exhibiting recurring resistance patterns in their microbiomes. Alternatively, a strategy involves implementing Green Veterinary Pharmacology (GVP) practices [1,10,11], utilizing crops and plants that produce antibacterial molecules. The Italian territory, with its abundant biodiversity of native plants boasting diverse nutraceutical functions, offers a promising resource for this purpose [12]. Some of this knowledge is rooted in the ancient traditions of rural areas and could be reassessed through scientific methods to validate any potential antimicrobial activity [13]. Another portion of this knowledge is already documented in scientific literature and requires systematic review. Assessing the efficacy of these plants or their extracts against microbes that jeopardize animal production efficiency could serve as a viable alternative to conventional antimicrobial therapeutic approaches. Furthermore, it may aid in curbing the emergence of additional antibiotic resistance phenomena.
This manuscript aims to delve into the vast repertoire of Italian flora and its potential as a solution to antimicrobial resistance. By reviewing the existing literature on the antimicrobial properties of plant species and their phytochemical constituents, we seek to identify key plant species and compounds that show the highest MIC values against S. aureus. This was performed via a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of the MIC values recorded in the analyzed literature.

2. Materials and Methods

The bibliographic searches were performed following the list of plants detected by Piras et al. [1]. The work described by the authors provided a ready-to-use comprehensive list of plants to be further tested against the indicated list of pathogens and to provide new alternative strategies against bacterial pathogens to be employed in Green Veterinary Pharmacology applications.
The list of plant extracts active against the most relevant pathogens for animal husbandry and animal infections was published in 2022 [1]. The list of plants growing in Italian territory was organized in a pathogen-driven way and included Gram+ and Gram- bacteria. Moreover, 39 plants were reported to be active against S. aureus, posing the query about which ones have the lowest MICs. Herein, in order to understand which ones may be suitable for a GVP approach, a new systematic review approach was used to register the MIC values so far annotated in the literature. The new searches were performed with no time nor geographic restriction in order to gather the most complete dataset.
From methodological point of view, all the detected and annotated plants as in the following Table 1 (adapted from Piras et al. [1]) and recorded as active against S. aureus were searched, using their scientific name and “Staphylococcus aureus” (e.g., Cinnamomum camphora and Staphylococcus aureus), again in PubMed, web of science and Scopus. All the entries were saved in separate files for each search. All the files (three for each plant) were uploaded on Rayyan (https://www.rayyan.ai/, accessed on 19 January 2023) and afterward exported as a single file in the .ris format. This step was performed in order to merge all the search results in a single file. The obtained file was afterward uploaded on Mendeley desktop (version 1.19.8) for the manual check and the duplicates removal. The obtained filtered file was exported and afterward uploaded in Rayyan (https://www.rayyan.ai/, accessed on 19 January 2023) for the keywords search and for the screening of the relevant manuscripts to be enrolled in the meta-analysis.
The keywords for the research on Rayyan were “MIC”, “MICs”, and “plant scientific name” (Genre species). This method allowed, for each plant, the detection of the scientific manuscripts where the words “MIC” and “MICs” were mentioned in the title/keywords/abstract, and, presumably, the MIC was studied/evaluated. After this selection process, every record was manually evaluated for MIC detection. In case the MIC value against S. aureus was clearly indicated, the study was included. This process was done individually by three different independent reviewers; the results were validated by cross-validating 15 randomly chosen recorded values by another referee. The MIC values for each plant, recorded in each independent study, were annotated in an Excel file along with the manuscript title. The mean and SD were calculated within the same spreadsheet, and obtained results were further analyzed with OpenMeta[Analyst] (http://www.cebm.brown.edu/openmeta/, accessed on 19 January 2023) for the creation of the Forest plots.

3. Results

All the plants annotated in the previously published review were individually searched against S. aureus in three different databases (see methods section). The search produced 4303 entries; reviews and other article types were excluded using Ryyan, resulting in 3369 entries. All other duplicates were removed, with Mendeley yielding 2301 records whose abstracts were manually screened by three independent reviewers for the MICs detection. The workflow regarding records inclusion and filtering is shown in the following Figure 1.
The records for each plant were further screened with the keywords for the inclusion and exclusion system of Rayyan. The keywords used for the records filtering were “MIC”, “MICs”, and “plant name”. All the resulting records were then manually screened for the MIC annotation. The results of this filtering process done for each plant are presented in Table 2. The list of annotated MICs, along with the DOI and the title of the manuscripts is visible in the Table S1 (Excel file, Supplementary Materials).
The quantitative MICs evaluation produced the results shown in Figure 2. Extracts of plants such as Coriandrum sativum, Crocus sativus, and Schinus molle showed high MIC values up to mean values as high as 200 mg/mL.
For a better visualization, the plants reporting the highest MICs were removed from the forest plot and, as visible in Figure 3, the most effective plant extracts were Salvia officinalis, Cistus monspeliensis, Cistus salviifolius, Origanum vulgare, and Myrtus communis with recorded average MICs against S.aures of, respectively, 0.46 (±0.56) mg/mL, 0.72 (±0.78) mg/mL, 0.83 (±1.03) mg/mL, 1.02 (±3.28), and 0.74 (±1.32).

4. Discussion

S. aureus is a significant human pathogen as well as a pathogen that is the causative agent of animal illnesses/conditions [48]. This bacterium causes mastitis in dairy cattle, an udder infection that causes major economic losses worldwide [49]. Antibiotic therapy is routinely used by veterinarians to treat infections, which increases the possibility of antibiotic resistance over time [50]. Intramammary dosing of a penicillin–novobiocin combination used to treat mastitis has been linked to increasing antimicrobial resistance, especially to ampicillin [51]. Other investigations conducted in different countries found that resistance to ampicillin ranged between 5.2% and 77.3% for bovine S. aureus strains, between 0% and 44.2% for gentamicin, and between 3% and 60% for tetracycline. In this regard, novel strategies to minimize resistance development are being developed [52].
The Mediterranean region is renowned for its abundant plant biodiversity, which has been cultivated and utilized for centuries in traditional medicine. Among the numerous therapeutic properties attributed to Mediterranean plants, their antimicrobial activity stands out as an important attribute [53]. The unique ecological conditions, including a mild climate and diverse soil composition, have contributed to the rich diversity of phytochemicals in these plants, which possess remarkable potential in combating microbial pathogens [1]. This serves as a tool to fight antimicrobial resistance, which has become a critical global health challenge [48]. The complex chemical composition of these plants, including alkaloids, terpenes, flavonoids, phenolics, and essential oils, provides a diverse range of compounds with diverse mechanisms of action against a broad spectrum of microbial pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses [54,55].
The antimicrobial mechanisms employed by these phytochemicals encompass various actions, such as disruption of cell membranes, inhibition of enzyme activity, modulation of microbial gene expression, and interference with microbial adhesion and biofilm formation [56,57,58].
Numerous plants have been investigated for their bioactive compounds and their potential efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus, including both methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains [1,59]. It is important to note that the effectiveness of these plants and their extracts can vary depending on the specific strains of Staphylococcus aureus tested, the concentration and formulation of the extracts, and the methods used for evaluation. For this reason, the literature on this subject is very heterogeneous, and it is missing a work capable of summarizing the plant extracts showing the highest MICs against the growth of S. aureus [56].
This research holds significant relevance, primarily because MRSA is the central concern within the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) monitoring initiative for animals raised for food production. Consequently, the proliferation of these bacteria resistant to multiple drugs presents a considerable public health hazard, given the potential for cross-species transmission, including to humans [60].
As described in the results section, we performed a systematic literature search and filtering that produced 2301 records that were subsequently manually filtered (see methods section) and screened by three different reviewers. The second column of Table 2 shows the total records for each plant, and the third column shows the records whose MIC was annotated for further statistical analysis. The forest plot represented in Figure 2 shows all the plants involved in this study, including plants such as Schinus molle, Coriadrum sativum, and Crocus sativus, which showed high values of average MICs. It is important to note that while Schinus molle has demonstrated antibacterial activity in various studies, further research is still needed to determine the optimal extraction methods, identify the most potent bioactive compounds, and evaluate the plant’s potential for clinical applications, but for the purpose of this work, it was discarded from further analysis. Additionally, the concentration, formulation, and mode of application of Schinus molle extracts can significantly influence their antibacterial efficacy. The average MIC calculated from the MICs recorded in our included studies was equal to ≈250 mg/mL, and the recorded values ranged from 176 to 324 mg/mL; therefore, we can consider that those values are too high to be considered a potential candidate against S. aureus. Even with lower MICs, plants such as Coriandrum sativum and Crocus sativus showed high average values (≈43 mg/mL and ≈24 mg/mL, respectively). For a more comprehensive visualization, those plants were removed from the forest plot.
The forest plot shown in Figure 3 does not include the three previously mentioned plant extracts and shows the most effective ones.
Salvia officinalis [52,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68], Cistus monspeliensis [69,70,71,72], Cistus salviifolius [69,71], Origanum vulgare [70,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107], and Myrtus communis [19,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120] showed an average MIC against S. aureus of respectively 0.46 (±0.56) mg/mL, 0.72 (±0.78) mg/mL, 0.831 (±1.033) mg/mL, 0.997 (±3.24), and 0.736 (±1.32).
Myrtus communis, commonly known as common myrtle or true myrtle, is a flowering plant native to the Mediterranean region. It has been used for various medicinal purposes throughout history, and its essential oil was used as an antibacterial [121,122]. It possesses antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative and is particularly active against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhimurium, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [123]. Monoterpenes are the most abundant group of compounds in Myrtus communis essential oil. They include compounds such as α-pinene, β-pinene, limonene, myrcene, and cineole (also known as eucalyptol) [124,125]. These compounds contribute to the characteristic scent of the essential oil and have shown various biological activities, including antibacterial and anti-inflammatory. Sesquiterpenes are another group of compounds present in Myrtus communis essential oil, although in smaller amounts compared to monoterpenes [126]. Examples of sesquiterpenes found in Myrtus communis essential oil include caryophyllene, germacrene D, and α-humulene [127]. Sesquiterpenes are known for their potential anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Oxides, such as 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol), are commonly found in Myrtus communis essential oil. Oxides can contribute to the expectorant and respiratory benefits of the essential oil and may have antimicrobial properties [112,128].
Sage exhibits antimicrobial activity against both methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) strains [129]. Its extracts contain compounds such as thujone, camphor, and cineole. These compounds have been shown to possess antibacterial properties and can inhibit the growth and proliferation of bacteria [67,130].
Cistus monspeliensis, commonly known as Montpellier cistus or rock rose, is a Mediterranean shrub known for its medicinal properties. It has been traditionally used for various therapeutic purposes, including its potential antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus [131]. While there is limited specific research available on the antibacterial activity of Cistus monspeliensis against Staphylococcus aureus, other species of the Cistus genus have been studied for their antimicrobial properties [132]. The antimicrobial activity of Cistus species is believed to be attributed to their bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols, flavonoids, and tannins, that are effective antibacterial agents [133].
The herb oregano, also known as Origanum vulgare L., is a perennial aromatic plant that is a member of the Lamiaceae family. It is frequently used as a flavoring herb, feed addition, and garden adornment, but it also serves as a medicine since it possesses antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory effects [134,135]. Oregano has a wide range of uses in food preservation due to the abundance of its active ingredients, including carvacrol and thymol, but it also has a unique bacteriostatic action on Salmonella enteritidis [136], Cronobacter sakazakii [137], Escherichia coli [135,138,139], Staphylococcus aureus [135], and Listeria monocytogenes [140,141]. There are differences in the quantity and quality of oregano essential oil (OEO) from diverse germplasm sources. The molecular composition of OEOs from various populations differs noticeably even under the same development environment. The composition of plant essential oils, which affects their antibacterial qualities, is influenced by a number of factors in addition to the diverse plant species, including the geographical environment and the time of harvest. With a rise in demand for the plant, artificial oregano growth and cultivar development have become more significant [137].
The five plants, Salvia officinalis (Common Sage), Cistus monspeliensis (Montpelier Rockrose), Cistus salviifolius (Sage-leaved Rockrose), Origanum vulgare (Common Oregano), and Myrtus communis (Common Myrtle), belong to different genera but share common traits in their composition. These traits provide valuable insights into their botanical classification and evolutionary relationships. All of these plants belong to the Kingdom Plantae and are classified under the Division Magnoliophyta (angiosperms) since they are flowering plants. In the case of Salvia officinalis and Origanum vulgare, they belong to the Lamiaceae family (the mint family), and both are part of the Mentheae tribe. Cistus monspeliensis and Cistus salviifolius are members of the Cistaceae family. There is significant research attention focused on the Cistus L. genus, which comprises numerous plants utilized in traditional medicine by populations residing in the vicinity of the Mediterranean Sea [142,143]. Myrtus communis belongs to the Myrtaceae family. Plants in this family are characterized by their aromatic leaves, usually containing essential oils, and their flowers often have numerous stamens surrounding a central style [144].
Despite being members of different genera, some of these plants share common traits in their taxonomy; two are part of the Lamiaceae family and two are of the Cistaceae family. Only Myrtus communis belongs to the Myrtaceae family.
From a chemical composition point of view, according to El Euch and colleagues [145], S.officinalis EO is mainly composed of Camphor (33.61%), 1,8-cineole (22.22%), and α-thujone (21.43%); the most abundant compounds detected in Cistus spp. include α-pinene, viridiflorol, borneol, trimethyl cyclohexanone, and camphene [146]; Origanum spp. essential oil is mainly composed of carvacrol (61.08–83.37%), p-cymene (3.02–9.87%), and γ-terpinene (4.13–6.34%) [91] and Myrtus communis EO is largely dominated by monoterpene hydrocarbons, with α-pinene (24.3–59.0%) and 1,8-cineole (13.2–49.5%) [147]. This evidence easily demonstrates that the majority of compounds are terpenes, and they are responsible for the characteristic aromas and flavors of these plants. One of the notable properties of terpenes is their antibacterial activity. While the specific mechanisms of action may vary depending on the terpene and the bacterial species, some common mechanisms include disruption of cell membranes, inhibition of enzyme activity, and interference with bacterial growth and replication [148,149,150,151]. Recently, terpenes have been found to be effective inhibitors of efflux pumps in a diverse range of bacterial strains, suggesting their potential utility in drug development for addressing antibiotic resistance [149]. Using terpenes as a sole treatment for bacterial infections may not be sufficient; they may be more effective as part of a comprehensive approach that includes traditional antibiotics and other appropriate medical interventions.
The presence of monoterpenes (alpha-pinene, beta-pinene, limonene, and myrcene) and sesquiterpenes (beta-caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide, and germacrene-D) is generally a significant common trait among these essential oils [91,145,146,147]. Another common trait in the chemical composition of these essential oils is the presence of oxygenated compounds. These compounds include alcohols, esters, ketones, and aldehydes. For instance, essential oils from Salvia officinalis and Origanum vulgare are rich in oxygenated monoterpenes, such as thujone and carvacrol, which contribute to their potent antimicrobial properties [152,153]. Myrtus communis oil contains myrtenol and 1,8-cineole [125,147,154], while Cistus species oils contain alpha-pinene and caryophyllene oxide as prominent oxygenated compounds [142].
Similarly, phenolic compounds are abundant in the essential oils of these plants and contribute to their antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Salvia officinalis and Origanum vulgare oils are particularly rich in phenolic compounds, such as thymol and carvacrol, which have been extensively studied for their health benefits [155,156].
Terpenoids, a class of compounds derived from terpenes, are also present in these essential oils. Notable terpenoids found in the oils of these plants include terpinen-4-ol, linalool, and borneol. These compounds contribute to the overall aroma and therapeutic effects of the oils.
ChatGPT-aided analysis helped with the qualitative representation of the compounds mainly present in the most effective EOs, as shown in the following Table 3.
Limonene and α-Pinene are present in the three most effective EOs against S. aureus (Venn diagram in Figure 4). Limonene is a cyclic monoterpene with a pleasant citrus aroma known for its strong antimicrobial activity against various bacteria and fungi. Its mechanism of action may be attributed to its ability to disrupt the cell membranes of bacteria and fungi, leading to cell leakage and subsequent cell death. It also interferes with the enzymatic processes in microorganisms, affecting their growth and replication [148,151].
α-Pinene is a bicyclic monoterpene commonly found in the essential oils of pine trees and other coniferous plants. Like limonene, α-pinene has demonstrated significant antimicrobial activity related to its ability to disrupt bacterial membranes and interfere with their essential cellular processes [157,158]. Both compounds were demonstrated to be strongly active against S. aureus [148,151,157,158].
Phytocomplexes, defined as a blend of bioactive compounds, have the ability to work synergistically, targeting multiple receptors, aiding the molecules in reaching their intended destination, and slowing down the degradation of active compounds [159,160].
The superiority of plant phytocomplexes over individual molecules is evident from the decreased activity observed after fractionation [159,160]. Furthermore, it is widely acknowledged that there is a need for compounds that can synergistically enhance the effectiveness of existing antibiotics when combating drug-resistant bacteria [161,162,163].
Utilizing plant-based compound extracts could be beneficial in combating antibiotic resistance. Nevertheless, their eventual application requires cautious regulation and control to prevent the emergence of resistance mechanisms to less specific biocides such as antiseptics, disinfectants, and preservatives [164].

5. Conclusions

The published literature about plants with antimicrobial activity against S. aureus is extremely wide and heterogeneous, and for this reason, it is necessary to comprehensively analyze the published results to draw a conclusion. This work started from the idea of developing a Green Veterinary Pharmacology intervention to be used against the most relevant bacterial pathogens. However, before starting with an experimental (benchtop) approach, we considered it necessary to deeply understand what was already published to avoid repeating previously performed experiments and to avoid producing redundant experimental evidence.
The essential oils of Salvia officinalis, Cistus monspeliensis, Cistus salviifolius, Origanum vulgare, and Myrtus communis share common traits in their chemical composition, including the presence of monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, oxygenated compounds, phenolic compounds, and terpenoids.
From obtained results herein described, it is possible to draw a conclusion about the most effective plants capable of inhibiting the growth of S. aureus that could be further tested for GVP interventions, such as the efficacy against isolates from animals.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11092264/s1, Table S1: Excel file with the references listed in the title.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.P.; methodology, F.O., R.D.F., C.P.; software, R.D.F., E.G., R.C., C.P.; formal analysis, F.O., R.D.F., E.G., C.P., D.B.; investigation, F.O., R.D.F., E.G., R.C., E.P., S.H.A.R., B.T., C.M., C.P., D.B.; resources, C.P.; data curation, F.O., R.D.F., E.G., S.H.A.R., C.P., D.B.; writing—original draft preparation, F.O., R.D.F., E.G., S.H.A.R., C.P.; writing—review and editing, F.O., R.D.F., E.G., R.C., E.P., S.H.A.R., B.T., C.M., C.P., D.B.; supervision, C.P., D.B.; project administration, C.P., D.B.; funding acquisition, C.P., D.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Magna Græcia University and “Brains to South”, Fondazione CON IL SUD, 2018-PDR-00912, “Quality assessment and characterization of Calabrian dairy products through Omics profiling”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Piras, C.; Tilocca, B.; Castagna, F.; Roncada, P.; Britti, D.; Palma, E. Plants with Antimicrobial Activity Growing in Italy: A Pathogen-Driven Systematic Review for Green Veterinary Pharmacology Applications. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Blasi, C.; Capotorti, G.; Michetti, L.; Rosati, L.; Smiraglia, D. Landscape heterogeneity and vegetation potential in Italy. Bocconea 2009, 23, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. Selvi, F.; Campetella, G.; Canullo, R.; Chelli, S.; Domina, G.; Farris, E.; Gasperini, C.; Rosati, L.; Wellstein, C.; Carrari, E. The Italian endemic forest plants. Plant Ecol. Evol. 2023, 156, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Croce, A.; Stinca, A.; Santangelo, A.; Esposito, A. Exploring vascular flora diversity of two protected sandy coastal areas in southern Italy. Rend. Lincei. Sci. Fis. Nat. 2019, 30, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fois, M.; Farris, E.; Calvia, G.; Campus, G.; Fenu, G.; Porceddu, M.; Bacchetta, G. The endemic vascular flora of Sardinia: A dynamic checklist with an overview of biogeography and conservation status. Plants 2022, 11, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Piras, C.; Hale, O.; Reynolds, C.K.; Jones, B.; Taylor, N.; Morris, M.; Cramer, R. LAP-MALDI MS coupled with machine learning: An ambient mass spectrometry approach for high-throughput diagnostics. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 1746–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Piras, C.; Soggiu, A.; Bonizzi, L.; Greco, V.; Ricchi, M.; Arrigoni, N.; Bassols, A.; Urbani, A.; Roncada, P. Identification of immunoreactive proteins of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Proteomics 2015, 15, 813–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Greco, V.; Piras, C.; Pieroni, L.; Urbani, A. Direct assessment of plasma/serum sample quality for proteomics biomarker investigation. In Serum/Plasma Proteomics. Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  9. Piras, C.; Hale, O.J.; Reynolds, C.K.; Jones, A.K.; Taylor, N.; Morris, M.; Cramer, R. Speciation and milk adulteration analysis by rapid ambient liquid MALDI mass spectrometry profiling using machine learning. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Castagna, F.; Piras, C.; Palma, E.; Musolino, V.; Lupia, C.; Bosco, A.; Rinaldi, L.; Cringoli, G.; Musella, V.; Britti, D. Green veterinary pharmacology applied to parasite control: Evaluation of punica granatum, artemisia campestris, salix caprea aqueous macerates against gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Piras, C.; Gugliandolo, E.; Castagna, F.; Palma, E.; Britti, D. Ivermectin (IVM) possible side activities and implications in antimicrobial resistance and animal welfare: The authors’ perspective. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Leporatti, M.L.; Impieri, M. Ethnobotanical notes about some uses of medicinal plants in Alto Tirreno Cosentino area (Calabria, Southern Italy). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2007, 3, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Passalacqua, N.G.; Guarrera, P.M.; De Fine, G. Contribution to the knowledge of the folk plant medicine in Calabria region (Southern Italy). Fitoterapia 2007, 78, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sharifi-Rad, J.; Dey, A.; Koirala, N.; Shaheen, S.; El Omari, N.; Salehi, B.; Goloshvili, T.; Cirone Silva, N.C.; Bouyahya, A.; Vitalini, S.; et al. Cinnamomum Species: Bridging Phytochemistry Knowledge, Pharmacological Properties and Toxicological Safety for Health Benefits. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 600139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bottoni, M.; Milani, F.; Mozzo, M.; Kolloffel, D.A.R.; Papini, A.; Fratini, F.; Maggi, F.; Santagostini, L. Sub-tissue localization of phytochemicals in cinnamomum camphora (L.) j. presl. growing in northern Italy. Plants 2021, 10, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mastino, P.M.; Marchetti, M.; Costa, J.; Juliano, C.; Usai, M. Analytical Profiling of Phenolic Compounds in Extracts of Three Cistus Species from Sardinia and Their Potential Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity. Chem. Biodivers. 2021, 18, e2100053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zucca, P.; Pintus, M.; Manzo, G.; Nieddu, M.; Steri, D.; Rinaldi, A.C. Antimicrobial, antioxidant and anti-tyrosinase properties of extracts of the Mediterranean parasitic plant Cytinus hypocistis. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sanna, C.; Maxia, A.; Fenu, G.; Loi, M.C. So uncommon and so singular, but underexplored: An updated overview on ethnobotanical uses, biological properties and phytoconstituents of sardinian endemic plants. Plants 2020, 9, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mir, M.A.; Bashir, N.; Alfaify, A.; Oteef, M.D.Y. GC-MS analysis of Myrtus communis extract and its antibacterial activity against gram-positive bacteria. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020, 20, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. de Souza, E.L.; de Barros, J.C.; de Oliveira, C.E.V.; da Conceição, M.L. Influence of Origanum vulgare L. essential oil on enterotoxin production, membrane permeability and surface characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 137, 308–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mezni, F.; Aouadhi, C.; Khouja, M.L.; Khaldi, A.; Maaroufi, A. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Pistacia lentiscus L. edible oil and phenolic extract. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pulaj, B.; Mustafa, B.; Nelson, K.; Quave, C.L.; Hajdari, A. Chemical composition and in vitro antibacterial activity of Pistacia terebinthus essential oils derived from wild populations in Kosovo. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nakagawa, S.; Hillebrand, G.G.; Nunez, G. Rosmarinus officinalis l. (rosemary) extracts containing carnosic acid and carnosol are potent quorum sensing inhibitors of staphylococcus aureus virulence. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Farahpour, M.R.; Pirkhezr, E.; Ashrafian, A.; Sonboli, A. Accelerated healing by topical administration of Salvia officinalis essential oil on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus infected wound model. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 128, 110120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Juliano, C.; Mattana, A.; Usai, M. Composition and in vitro antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of thymus herba-barona loisel growing wild in sardinia. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2000, 12, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. de Carvalho, R.J.; de Souza, G.T.; Honório, V.G.; de Sousa, J.P.; da Conceição, M.L.; Maganani, M.; de Souza, E.L. Comparative inhibitory effects of Thymus vulgaris L. essential oil against Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes and mesophilic starter co-culture in cheese-mimicking models. Food Microbiol. 2015, 52, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. D’Agostino, G.; Badalamenti, N.; Franco, P.; Bruno, M.; Gallo, G. The chemical composition of the flowers essential oil of Inula crithmoides (Asteraceae) growing in aeolian islands, Sicily (Italy) and its biocide properties on microorganisms affecting historical art crafts. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 36, 2993–3001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ouassou, H.; Bouhrim, M.; Kharchoufa, L.; Imtara, H.; Elhouda Daoudi, N.; Benoutman, A.; Bencheikh, N.; Ouahhoud, S.; Elbouzidi, A.; Bnouham, M. Caralluma europaea (Guss) N.E.Br.: A review on ethnomedicinal uses, phytochemistry, pharmacological activities, and toxicology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 273, 113769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mykhailenko, O.; Bezruk, I.; Ivanauskas, L.; Georgiyants, V. Comparative analysis of apocarotenoids and phenolic constituents of Crocus sativus stigmas from 11 countries: Ecological impact. Arch. Pharm. 2022, 355, e2100468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Najar, B.; Nardi, V.; Cervelli, C.; Mancianti, F.; Nardoni, S.; Ebani, V.V.; Pistelli, L. Helichrysum araxinum Takht. ex Kirp. grown in Italy: Volatiloma composition and in vitro antimicrobial activity. Zeitschrift Naturforsch.-Sect. C J. Biosci. 2020, 75, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Turchetti, G.; Garzoli, S.; Masci, V.L.; Sabia, C.; Iseppi, R.; Giacomello, P.; Tiezzi, A.; Ovidi, E. Antimicrobial testing of schinus molle (l.) leaf extracts and fractions followed by gc-ms investigation of biological active fractions. Molecules 2020, 25, 1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zengin, G.; Menghini, L.; Sotto, A.D.; Mancinelli, R.; Sisto, F.; Carradori, S.; Cesa, S.; Fraschetti, C.; Filippi, A.; Angiolella, L.; et al. Chromatographic analyses, in vitro biological activities, and cytotoxicity of cannabis sativa l. Essential oil: A multidisciplinary study. Molecules 2018, 23, 3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. El Menyiy, N.; Guaouguaou, F.E.; El Baaboua, A.; El Omari, N.; Taha, D.; Salhi, N.; Shariati, M.A.; Aanniz, T.; Benali, T.; Zengin, G.; et al. Phytochemical properties, biological activities and medicinal use of Centaurium erythraea Rafn. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 276, 114171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fratianni, F.; Cozzolino, A.; de Feo, V.; Coppola, R.; Ombra, M.N.; Nazzaro, F. Polyphenols, Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Biofilm Inhibitory Activities of Peel and Pulp of Citrus medica L., Citrus bergamia, and Citrus medica cv. Salò cultivated in southern Italy. Molecules 2019, 24, 4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Caputo, L.; Nazzaro, F.; Souza, L.F.; Aliberti, L.; De Martino, L.; Fratianni, F.; Coppola, R.; De Feo, V. Laurus nobilis: Composition of essential oil and its biological activities. Molecules 2017, 22, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Quave, C.L.; Estévez-Carmona, M.; Compadre, C.M.; Hobby, G.; Hendrickson, H.; Beenken, K.E.; Smeltzer, M.S. Ellagic acid derivatives from Rubus ulmifolius inhibit Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and improve response to antibiotics. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e28737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Fratianni, F.; Coppola, R.; Nazzaro, F. Phenolic composition and antimicrobial and antiquorum sensing activity of an ethanolic extract of peels from the apple cultivar annurca. J. Med. Food 2011, 14, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sadeghi, Z.; Yang, J.L.; Venditti, A.; Moridi Farimani, M. A review of the phytochemistry, ethnopharmacology and biological activities of Teucrium genus (Germander). Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 36, 5647–5664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Badalamenti, N.; Modica, A.; Ilardi, V.; Bruno, M.; Maresca, V.; Zanfardino, A.; Di Napoli, M.; Castagliuolo, G.; Varcamonti, M.; Basile, A. Daucus carota subsp. maximus (Desf.) Ball from Pantelleria, Sicily (Italy): Isolation of essential oils and evaluation of their bioactivity. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 36, 5842–5847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maisetta, G.; Batoni, G.; Caboni, P.; Esin, S.; Rinaldi, A.C.; Zucca, P. Tannin profile, antioxidant properties, and antimicrobial activity of extracts from two Mediterranean species of parasitic plant Cytinus. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 19, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pellegrini, M.; Ricci, A.; Serio, A.; Chaves-López, C.; Mazzarrino, G.; D’Amato, S.; Lo Sterzo, C.; Paparella, A. Characterization of essential oils obtained from Abruzzo autochthonous plants: Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities assessment for food application. Foods 2018, 7, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fratianni, F.; Riccardi, R.; Spigno, P.; Ombra, M.N.; Cozzolino, A.; Tremonte, P.; Coppola, R.; Nazzaro, F. Biochemical Characterization and Antimicrobial and Antifungal Activity of Two Endemic Varieties of Garlic (Allium sativum L.) of the Campania Region, Southern Italy. J. Med. Food 2016, 19, 686–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mancini, E.; Senatore, F.; Del Monte, D.; De Martino, L.; Grulova, D.; Scognamiglio, M.; Snoussi, M.; De Feo, V. Studies on chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of five Thymus vulgaris L. essential oils. Molecules 2015, 20, 12016–12028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Carlo Tenore, G.; Troisi, J.; Di Fiore, R.; Basile, A.; Novellino, E. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of Rapa Catozza Napoletana (Brassica rapa L. var. rapa DC.) seed meal, a promising protein source of Campania region (southern Italy) horticultural germplasm. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 1716–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Loy, G.; Cottiglia, F.; Garau, D.; Deidda, D.; Pompei, R.; Bonsignore, L. Chemical composition and cytotoxic and antimicrobial activity of Calycotome villosa (Poiret) Link leaves. Farmaco 2001, 56, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Angioni, A.; Barra, A.; Russo, M.T.; Coroneo, V.; Dessí, S.; Cabras, P. Chemical composition of the essential oils of Juniperus from ripe and unripe berries and leaves and their antimicrobial activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 3073–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mazzanti, G.; Battinelli, L.; Salvatore, G. Antimicrobial properties of the linalol-rich essential oil of Hyssopos officinalis L. var decumbens (Lamiaceae). Flavour Fragr. J. 1998, 13, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Piras, C.; Di Ciccio, P.A.; Soggiu, A.; Greco, V.; Tilocca, B.; Costanzo, N.; Ceniti, C.; Urbani, A.; Bonizzi, L.; Ianieri, A.S. aureus biofilm protein expression linked to antimicrobial resistance: A proteomic study. Animals 2021, 11, 966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Campos, B.; Pickering, A.C.; Rocha, L.S.; Aguilar, A.P.; Fabres-Klein, M.H.; de Oliveira Mendes, T.A.; Fitzgerald, J.R.; de Oliveira Barros Ribon, A. Diversity and pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine mastitis: Current understanding and future perspectives. BMC Vet. Res. 2022, 18, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Piras, C.; Greco, V.; Gugliandolo, E.; Soggiu, A.; Tilocca, B.; Bonizzi, L.; Zecconi, A.; Cramer, R.; Britti, D.; Urbani, A.; et al. Raw cow milk bacterial consortium as bioindicator of circulating anti-microbial resistance (Amr). Animals 2020, 10, 2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Thornsberry, C.; Burton, P.J.; Yee, Y.C.; Watts, J.L.; Yancey Jr, R.J. The activity of a combination of penicillin and novobiocin against bovine mastitis pathogens: Development of a disk diffusion test. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Silva, D.M.; Costa, P.A.D.A.; Ribon, A.O.B.; Purgato, G.A.; Gaspar, D.-M.; Diaz, M.A.N. Plant Extracts Display Synergism with Different Classes of Antibiotics. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2019, 91, e20180117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Radulovic, N.S.; Blagojevic, P.D.; Stojanovic-Radic, Z.Z.; Stojanovic, N.M. Antimicrobial plant metabolites: Structural diversity and mechanism of action. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 932–952. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Riyadi, S.A.; Naini, A.A.; Supratman, U. Sesquiterpenoids from Meliaceae Family and Their Biological Activities. Molecules 2023, 28, 4874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ashraf, M.V.; Pant, S.; Khan, M.A.H.; Shah, A.A.; Siddiqui, S.; Jeridi, M.; Alhamdi, H.W.S.; Ahmad, S. Phytochemicals as Antimicrobials: Prospecting Himalayan Medicinal Plants as Source of Alternate Medicine to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rahman, M.M.; Rahaman, M.S.; Islam, M.R.; Hossain, M.E.; Mithi, F.M.; Ahmed, M.; Saldías, M.; Akkol, E.K.; Sobarzo-Sánchez, E. Multifunctional therapeutic potential of phytocomplexes and natural extracts for antimicrobial properties. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. AlSheikh, H.M.A.; Sultan, I.; Kumar, V.; Rather, I.A.; Al-Sheikh, H.; Tasleem Jan, A.; Haq, Q.M.R. Plant-based phytochemicals as possible alternative to antibiotics in combating bacterial drug resistance. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Khameneh, B.; Eskin, N.A.M.; Iranshahy, M.; Fazly Bazzaz, B.S. Phytochemicals: A promising weapon in the arsenal against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Mehmood, B.; Dar, K.K.; Ali, S.; Awan, U.A.; Nayyer, A.Q.; Ghous, T.; Andleeb, S. Short communication: In vitro assessment of antioxidant, antibacterial and phytochemical analysis of peel of Citrus sinensis. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 28, 231–239. [Google Scholar]
  60. Galgano, M.; Capozza, P.; Pellegrini, F.; Cordisco, M.; Sposato, A.; Sblano, S.; Camero, M.; Lanave, G.; Fracchiolla, G.; Corrente, M.; et al. Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils Evaluated In Vitro against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sehnal, K.; Uhlirova, D.; Stankova, M.; Vsetickova, M.; Tothova, Z.; Hosnedlova, B.; Kepinska, M.; Ruttkaynedecký, B.; Bach, D.N.; Sochor, J.; et al. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using sage and their antibacterial effect on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. In Proceedings of the NANOCON Conference Proceedings—International Conference on Nanomaterials, Brno, Czech Republic, 21–23 October 2020; pp. 469–473. [Google Scholar]
  62. Horiuchi, K.; Shiota, S.; Hatano, T.; Yoshida, T.; Kuroda, T.; Tsuchiya, T. Antimicrobial activity of oleanolic acid from Salvia officinalis and related compounds on vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRIE). Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 30, 1147–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kot, B.; Wierzchowska, K.; Piechota, M.; Czerniewicz, P.; Chrzanowski, G. Antimicrobial activity of five essential oils from lamiaceae against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 3587–3591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Stefanovic, O.D.; Stanojevic, D.D.; Comic, L.R. Synergistic antibacterial activity of salvia officinalis and cichorium intybus extracts and antibiotics. ACTA Pol. Pharm. 2012, 69, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Snowden, R.; Harrington, H.; Morrill, K.; Jeane, L.; Garrity, J.; Orian, M.; Lopez, E.; Rezaie, S.; Hassberger, K.; Familoni, D.; et al. A Comparison of the Anti-Staphylococcus aureus Activity of Extracts from Commonly Used Medicinal Plants. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2014, 20, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rota, C.; Carramiñana, J.J.; Burillo, J.; Herrera, A. In vitro antimicrobial activity of essential oils from aromatic plants against selected foodborne pathogens. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 1252–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mehdizadeh, T.; Hashemzadeh, M.S.; Nazarizadeh, A.; Neyriz-Naghadehi, M.; Tat, M.; Ghalavand, M.; Dorostkar, R. Chemical composition and antibacterial properties of Ocimum basilicum, Salvia officinalis and Trachyspermum ammi essential oils alone and in combination with nisin. Res. J. Pharmacogn. 2016, 3, 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  68. Leelapornpisid, P.; Chansakao, S.; Ittiwittayawat, T.; Pruksakorn, S. Antimicrobial activity of herbal extracts on Staphylococcus aureus and Propionibacterium acnes. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 679: III WOCMAP Congress on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants—Volume 5: Quality, Efficacy, Safety, Processing and Trade in Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. 2005, pp. 97–104. Available online: https://www.actahort.org/books/679/679_11.htm (accessed on 6 September 2023).
  69. Zalegh, I.; Bourhia, M.; Zerouali, K.; Katfy, K.; Nayme, K.; Khallouki, F.; Benzaarate, I.; Mohammad Salamatullah, A.; Alzahrani, A.; Nafidi, H.-A.; et al. Molecular Characterization of Gene-Mediated Resistance and Susceptibility of ESKAPE Clinical Isolates to Cistus monspeliensis L. and Cistus salviifolius L. Extracts. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 7467279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Hickl, J.; Argyropoulou, A.; Sakavitsi, M.E.; Halabalaki, M.; Al-Ahmad, A.; Hellwig, E.; Aligiannis, N.; Skaltsounis, A.L.; Wittmer, A.; Vach, K.; et al. Mediterranean herb extracts inhibit microbial growth of representative oral microorganisms and biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Rebaya, A.; Belghith, S.I.; Hammrouni, S.; Maaroufi, A.; Ayadi, M.T.; Chérif, J.K. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of ethanol extracts of Halimium halimifolium, Cistus salviifolius and Cistus monspeliensis. Int. J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2016, 8, 243–247. [Google Scholar]
  72. Nefzi, K.; Charfi, K.; Maaroufi, A.; Hosni, K.; Msaada, K.; Baraket, M.; Nasr, Z. Biological activities and determination of the mode of action of Tunisian Globularia alypum and Cistus monspeliensis ethanolic extracts. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, M.; Luo, F.; Qing, Z.; Yang, H.; Liu, X.; Yang, Z.; Zeng, J. Chemical composition and bioactivity of essential oil of ten labiatae species. Molecules 2020, 25, 4862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rodrigues, J.B.D.; de Carvalho, R.J.; de Souza, N.T.; Oliveira, K.D.; Franco, O.L.; Schaffner, D.; de Souza, E.L.; Magnani, M. Effects of oregano essential oil and carvacrol on biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus from food-contact surfaces. Food Control 2017, 73, 1237–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Prazina, N.; Bacic, A.; Hadzic-Hasanovic, V.; Mahmutovic, O. The antibacterial activity of essential oil of oregano (origanum vulgare l.) from bosnia and herzegovina against selected atcc strains. Plant Cell Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. 2021, 22, 140–144. [Google Scholar]
  76. Stojkovic, D.; Glamoclija, J.; Ciric, A.; Nikolic, M.; Ristic, M.; Siljegovic, J.; Sokovic, M. Investigation on antibacterial synergism of origanum vulgare and thymus vulgaris essential oils. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2013, 65, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zitek, T.; Borjan, D.; Golle, A.; Knez, Z.; Knez, M.; Žitek, T.; Borjan, D.; Golle, A.; Knez, Ž.; Knez, M. Optimization of extraction of phenolic compounds with antimicrobial properties from origanum vulgare. Processes 2021, 9, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. de Barros, J.C.; da Conceicao, M.L.; Neto, N.J.G.; da Costa, A.C.V.; de Souza, E.L. Combination of Origanum vulgare L. essential oil and lactic acid to inhibit staphylococcus aureus in meat broth and meat model. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2012, 43, 1120–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Karaman, M.; Bogavac, M.; Radovanović, B.; Sudji, J.; Tešanović, K.; Janjušević, L. Origanum vulgare essential oil affects pathogens causing vaginal infections. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Neto, L.T.; Monteiro, M.L.G.; Machado, M.A.M.; Galvan, D.; Conte, C.A. An Optimization of Oregano, Thyme, and Lemongrass Essential Oil Blend to Simultaneous Inactivation of Relevant Foodborne Pathogens by Simplex-Centroid Mixture Design. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Licina, B.Z.; Stefanovic, O.D.; Vasic, S.M.; Radojevic, I.D.; Dekic, M.S.; Comic, L.R.; Ličina, B.Z.; Stefanović, O.D.; Vasić, S.M.; Radojević, I.D.; et al. Biological activities of the extracts from wild growing Origanum vulgare L. Food Control 2013, 33, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hulankova, R.; Borilova, G.; Hulánková, R.; Bořilová, G. In vitro combined effect of oregano essential oil and caprylic acid against salmonella serovars, escherichia coli O157:H7, staphylococcus aureus and listeria monocytogenes. Acta Vet. Brno 2011, 80, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Nedorostova, L.; Kloucek, P.; Kokoska, L.; Stolcova, M.; Pulkrabek, J. Antimicrobial properties of selected essential oils in vapour phase against foodborne bacteria. Food Control 2009, 20, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. de Souza, G.T.; de Carvalho, R.J.; de Sousa, J.P.; Tavares, J.F.; Schaffner, D.; de Souza, E.L.; Magnani, M. Effects of the Essential Oil from Origanum vulgare L. on Survival of Pathogenic Bacteria and Starter Lactic Acid Bacteria in Semihard Cheese Broth and Slurry. J. Food Prot. 2016, 79, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. de Souza, E.L.; de Barros, J.C.; da Conceicao, M.L.; Neto, N.J.G.; da Costa, A.C.V. Combined application of Origanum vulgare L. essential oil and acetic acid for controlling the growth of staphylococcus aureus in foods. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2009, 40, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Heni, S.; Boughendjioua, H.; Saida, M.; Bennadja, S.; Djahoudi, A. Use of Origanum vulgare Essential Oil as an Antibacterial Additive in the Preservation of Minced Meat. J. Pharm. Res. Int. 2020, 32, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. de Oliveira, J.; Diniz, M.D.M.; Lima, E.D.; de Souza, E.L.; Trajano, V.N.; Santos, B.H.C. Effectiveness of Origanum vulgare L. and Origanum majorana L. Essential oils in Inhibiting the Growth of Bacterial Strains Isolated from the Patients with Conjunctivitis. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2009, 52, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. de Souza, E.L.; Stamford, T.L.M.; Lima, E.D.O.; Barbosa, J.M.; Marques, M.O.M. Interference of heating on the antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of Origanum vulgare L. (Lamiaceae) essential oil. Cienc. E Tecnol. Aliment. 2008, 28, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Granata, G.; Stracquadanio, S.; Leonardi, M.; Napoli, E.; Consoli, G.M.L.; Cafiso, V.; Stefani, S.; Geraci, C. Essential oils encapsulated in polymer-based nanocapsules as potential candidates for application in food preservation. Food Chem. 2018, 269, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Karaboduk, K.; Karabacak, O.; Karaboduk, H.; Tekinay, T. Chemical analysis and antimicrobial activities of the Origanum vulgare subsp. Hirtum. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2014, 15, 1283–1292. [Google Scholar]
  91. Béjaoui, A.; Chaabane, H.; Jemli, M.; Boulila, A.; Boussaid, M. Essential oil composition and antibacterial activity of Origanum vulgare subsp. glandulosum Desf. at different phenological stages. J. Med. Food 2013, 16, 1115–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Verma, R.S.; Padalia, R.C.; Saikia, D.; Chauhan, A.; Krishna, V. Antibacterial Activity of Origanum vulgare L. Popul. Indian Orig. J. Biol. Act. Prod. from Nat. 2012, 2, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hussain, A.I.; Anwar, F.; Rasheed, S.; Nigam, P.S.; Janneh, O.; Sarker, S.D. Composition, antioxidant and chemotherapeutic properties of the essential oils from two Origanum species growing in Pakistan. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2011, 21, 943–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Da Costa, A.C.; Dos Santos, B.H.C.; Filho, L.S.; Lima, E.D.O. Antibacterial activity of the essential oil of Origanum vulgare L. (Lamiaceae) against bacterial multiresistant strains isolated from nosocomial patients. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2009, 19, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Enayatifard, R.; Akbari, J.; Babaei, A.; Rostamkalaei, S.S.; Hashemi, S.M.H.; Habibi, E. Anti-microbial potential of nano-emulsion form of essential oil obtained from aerial parts of Origanum vulgare L. as food additive. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2021, 11, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Turgis, M.; Vu, K.D.; Dupont, C.; Lacroix, M. Combined antimicrobial effect of essential oils and bacteriocins against foodborne pathogens and food spoilage bacteria. Food Res. Int. 2012, 48, 696–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Koca, T.; Koca, O.; Korcum, A.F. Antimicrobial activities of essential oils on microorganisms isolated from radiation dermatitis. J. Clin. Anal. Med. 2019, 10, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kovačević, Z.; Kladar, N.; Čabarkapa, I.; Radinović, M.; Maletić, M.; Erdeljan, M.; Božin, B. New Perspective of Origanum vulgare L. and Satureja montana L. Essential Oils as Bovine Mastitis Treatment Alternatives. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Alexopoulos, A.; Plessas, S.; Kimbaris, A.; Varvatou, M.; Mantzourani, I.; Fournomiti, M.; Tzouti, V.; Nerantzaki, A.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Mode of antimicrobial action of Origanum vulgare essential oil against clinical pathogens. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. 2017, 5, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Alexopoulos, A.; Kimbaris, A.C.; Plessas, S.; Mantzourani, I.; Theodoridou, I.; Stavropoulou, E.; Polissiou, M.G.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Antibacterial activities of essential oils from eight Greek aromatic plants against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Anaerobe 2011, 17, 399–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tanasescu, S.; Nitu, R.; Dahma, G.; Pilut, C.; Diaconu, M.; Neagoe, O.; Muntean, D.; Horhat, I.D.; Dragomir, A.; Lighezan, D.; et al. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oil of Romanian Origanum vulgare. Rev. Chim. 2019, 70, 1744–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pesavento, G.; Maggini, V.; Maida, I.; Lo Nostro, A.; Calonico, C.; Sassoli, C.; Perrin, E.; Fondi, M.; Mengoni, A.; Chiellini, C.; et al. Essential Oil from Origanum vulgare Completely Inhibits the Growth of Multidrug-Resistant Cystic Fibrosis Pathogens. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 861–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fikry, S.; Khalil, N.; Salama, O. Chemical profiling, biostatic and biocidal dynamics of Origanum vulgare L. essential oil. AMB Express 2019, 9, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Hashemi, S.M.B.; Nikmaram, N.; Esteghlal, S.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A.; Niakousari, M.; Barba, F.J.; Roohinejad, S.; Koubaa, M.; Khaneghah, A.M.; Niakousari, M.; et al. Efficiency of Ohmic assisted hydrodistillation for the extraction of essential oil from oregano (Origanum vulgare subsp viride) spices. Innov. FOOD Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 41, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Helal, I.M.; El-Bessoumy, A.; Al-Bataineh, E.; Joseph, M.R.P.; Rajagopalan, P.; Chandramoorthy, H.C.; Ben Hadj Ahmed, S.; Ahmed, S.B.; Ben Hadj Ahmed, S. Antimicrobial efficiency of essential oils from traditional medicinal plants of asir region, Saudi Arabia, over drug resistant isolates. Biomed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 8928306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lopez, P.; Sanchez, C.; Batlle, R.; Nerin, C.; López, P.; Sanchez, C.; Batlle, R.; Nerín, C. Vapor-phase activities of cinnamon, thyme, and oregano essential oils and key constituents against foodborne microorganisms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4348–4356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hao, Y.P.; Li, J.Y.; Shi, L. A Carvacrol-Rich Essential Oil Extracted From Oregano (Origanum vulgare “Hot & Spicy”) Exerts Potent Antibacterial Effects Against Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 741861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bonjar, G.H.S.; Shahidi Bonjar, G.H. Antibacterial screening of plants used in Iranian folkloric medicine. Fitoterapia 2004, 75, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Erdogan Eliuz, E.A.; Ayas, D.; Goksen, G. In Vitro Phototoxicity and Antimicrobial Activity of Volatile Oil Obtained from Some Aromatic Plants. J. Essent. Oil-Bearing Plants 2017, 20, 758–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kaya, D.A.; Duran, N. The antimicrobial activities of myrtus communis AND Micromeria fruticosa essential oils. In International Conference on Advanced Materials and Systems (ICAMS); The National Research & Development Institute for Textiles and Leather-INCDTP: Bucharest, Romania, 2018; pp. 249–254. [Google Scholar]
  111. Nabavizadeh, M.; Abbaszadegan, A.; Gholami, A.; Sheikhiani, R.; Shokouhi, M.; Shams, M.S.; Ghasemi, Y. Chemical constituent and antimicrobial effect of essential oil from Myrtus communis leaves on microorganisms involved in persistent endodontic infection compared to two common endodontic irrigants: An in vitro study. J. Conserv. Dent. 2014, 17, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Caputo, L.; Capozzolo, F.; Amato, G.; De Feo, V.; Fratianni, F.; Vivenzio, G.; Nazzaro, F. Chemical composition, antibiofilm, cytotoxic, and anti-acetylcholinesterase activities of Myrtus communis L. leaves essential oil. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2022, 22, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Djenane, D.; Yanguela, J.; Amrouche, T.; Boubrit, S.; Boussad, N.; Roncales, P. Chemical composition and antimicrobial effects of essential oils of Eucalyptus globulus, Myrtus communis and Satureja hortensis against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus in minced beef. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2011, 17, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Sisay, M.; Bussa, N.; Gashaw, T.; Mengistu, G. Investigating In Vitro Antibacterial Activities of Medicinal Plants Having Folkloric Repute in Ethiopian Traditional Medicine. J. evidence-based Integr. Med. 2019, 24, 2515690X19886276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Raeiszadeh, M.; Pardakhty, A.; Sharififar, F.; Mehrabani, M.; Nejat-Mehrab-Kermani, H.; Mehrabani, M. Phytoniosome: A Novel Drug Delivery for Myrtle Extract. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. IJPR 2018, 17, 804–817. [Google Scholar]
  116. Mansouri, S.; Foroumadi, A.; Ghaneie, T.; Najar, A.G. Antibacterial activity of the crude extracts and fractionated constituents of Myrtus communis. Pharm. Biol. 2001, 39, 399–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Benhadid, R.; Hadef, Y.; Djahoudi, A.; Hosni, K. Chemical Characterization, Evaluation of the Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities of the Essential Oil of Algerian (Myrtus communis L). Prog. Nutr. 2022, 24, e2022029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Karaçam, M.; Kaya, D.A. Effect of essential oils on some pathogens that cause eczema. In Proceedings of the ICAMS Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Materials and Systems, Langkawi, Turkey, 26–27 November 2020; pp. 183–188. [Google Scholar]
  119. El Hartiti, H.; El Mostaphi, A.; Barrahi, M.; Ali, A.B.; Chahboun, N.; Amiyare, R.; Zarrouk, A.; Bourkhiss, B.; Ouhssine, M. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of the essential oil of Myrtus communis leaves. Karbala Int. J. Mod. Sci. 2020, 6, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Najar, A.G.; Mansouri, S.; Rahighi, S. Effects of sub-inhibitory concentrations of Myrtus communis leave extracts on the induction of free radicals in Staphylococcus aureus; a possible mechanism for the antibacterial action. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2009, 8, 551–556. [Google Scholar]
  121. Rahimvand, L.; Niakan, M.; Naderi, N.J. The antibacterial effect of aquatic and methanolic extract of Myrtus communis on Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia. Iran. J. Microbiol. 2018, 10, 254. [Google Scholar]
  122. Dib, K.; Cherrah, Y.; Rida, S.; Filali-Maltouf, A.; Ennibi, O. In vitro antibacterial activity of Myrtus communis L. and Marrubium vulgare L. leaves against Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Eikenella corrodens. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 8351332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Gorjian, H.; Khaligh, N.G. Myrtle: A versatile medicinal plant. Nutrire 2023, 48, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ben Hsouna, A.; Hamdi, N.; Miladi, R.; Abdelkafi, S. Myrtus communis essential oil: Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities against food spoilage pathogens. Chem. Biodivers. 2014, 11, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Usai, M.; Marchetti, M.; Culeddu, N.; Mulas, M. Chemical composition of myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) berries essential oils as observed in a collection of genotypes. Molecules 2018, 23, 2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Savikin-Fodulovic, K.P.; Bulatovic, V.M.; Menkovic, N.R.; Grubisic, D. V Comparison between the essential oil of Myrtus communis L. obtained from naturally grown and in vitro plants. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2000, 12, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Aleksic, V.; Knezevic, P. Antimicrobial and antioxidative activity of extracts and essential oils of Myrtus communis L. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hendry, E.R.; Worthington, T.; Conway, B.R.; Lambert, P.A. Antimicrobial efficacy of eucalyptus oil and 1, 8-cineole alone and in combination with chlorhexidine digluconate against microorganisms grown in planktonic and biofilm cultures. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009, 64, 1219–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Zomorodian, K.; Moein, M.; Pakshir, K.; Karami, F.; Sabahi, Z. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of the essential oil from Salvia mirzayanii leaves. J. Evid. Based. Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 22, 770–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Longaray Delamare, A.P.; Moschen-Pistorello, I.T.; Artico, L.; Atti-Serafini, L.; Echeverrigaray, S. Antibacterial activity of the essential oils of Salvia officinalis L. and Salvia triloba L. cultivated in South Brazil. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Bouamama, H.; Noël, T.; Villard, J.; Benharref, A.; Jana, M. Antimicrobial activities of the leaf extracts of two Moroccan cistus L. species. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 104, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Álvarez-Martínez, F.J.; Borrás-Rocher, F.; Micol, V.; Barrajón-Catalán, E. Artificial intelligence applied to improve scientific reviews: The antibacterial activity of Cistus plants as proof of concept. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Haida, S.; Bakkouche, K.; Kribii, A.R.; Kribii, A. Chemical Composition of Essential Oil, Phenolic Compounds Content, and Antioxidant Activity of Cistus monspeliensis from Northern Morocco. Biochem. Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 6669877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Moghrovyan, A.; Parseghyan, L.; Sevoyan, G.; Darbinyan, A.; Sahakyan, N.; Gaboyan, M.; Karabekian, Z.; Voskanyan, A. Antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory, and cytotoxic properties of Origanum vulgare essential oil, rich with β-caryophyllene and β-caryophyllene oxide. Korean J. Pain 2022, 35, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ghitea, T.C.; El-Kharoubi, A.; Ganea, M.; Bimbo-Szuhai, E.; Nemeth, T.S.; Ciavoi, G.; Foghis, M.; Dobjanschi, L.; Pallag, A.; Micle, O. The Antimicrobial Activity of Origanum vulgare L. Correlated with the Gastrointestinal Perturbation in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome. Molecules 2021, 26, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Barbosa, L.N.; Alves, F.C.B.; Andrade, B.F.M.T.; Albano, M.; Rall, V.L.M.; Fernandes, A.A.H.; Buzalaf, M.A.R.; de Lima Leite, A.; de Pontes, L.G.; Dos Santos, L.D. Proteomic analysis and antibacterial resistance mechanisms of Salmonella Enteritidis submitted to the inhibitory effect of Origanum vulgare essential oil, thymol and carvacrol. J. Proteomics 2020, 214, 103625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Guo, X.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Xia, F.; Bai, H.; Li, H.; Shi, L. Comparison of Origanum Essential Oil Chemical Compounds and Their Antibacterial Activity against Cronobacter sakazakii. Molecules 2022, 27, 6702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Burt, S.A.; Reinders, R.D. Antibacterial activity of selected plant essential oils against Escherichia coli O157:H7. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 36, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Selim, S. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and escherichia coli O157: H7 in feta soft cheese and minced beef meat. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2011, 42, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kolypetri, S.; Kostoglou, D.; Nikolaou, A.; Kourkoutas, Y.; Giaouris, E. Chemical Composition, Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Actions of Oregano (Origanum vulgare subsp. hirtum) Essential Oil against Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes. Foods 2023, 12, 2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Faleiro, L.; Miguel, G.; Gomes, S.; Costa, L.; Venâncio, F.; Teixeira, A.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of essential oils isolated from Thymbra capitata L. (Cav.) and Origanum vulgare L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 8162–8168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zalegh, I.; Akssira, M.; Bourhia, M.; Mellouki, F.; Rhallabi, N.; Salamatullah, A.M.; Alkaltham, M.S.; Khalil Alyahya, H.; Mhand, R.A. A review on Cistus sp.: Phytochemical and antimicrobial activities. Plants 2021, 10, 1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Bouabidi, M.; Salamone, F.L.; Gadhi, C.; Bouamama, H.; Speciale, A.; Ginestra, G.; Pulvirenti, L.; Siracusa, L.; Nostro, A.; Cristani, M. Efficacy of Two Moroccan Cistus Species Extracts against Acne Vulgaris: Phytochemical Profile, Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory and Antimicrobial Activities. Molecules 2023, 28, 2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Garcia, M.O.; Allend, S.O.; Cunha, K.F.d.; Hartwig, D.D. Myrtaceae family: An update on plant-derived bioactive compounds against bacteria that affect the respiratory system. Rodriguésia 2023, 74, e00822022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. El Euch, S.K.; Hassine, D.B.; Cazaux, S.; Bouzouita, N.; Bouajila, J. Salvia officinalis essential oil: Chemical analysis and evaluation of anti-enzymatic and antioxidant bioactivities. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 120, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Kokotkiewicz, A.; Luczkiewicz, M. Celery (Apium graveolens var. dulce (Mill.) Pers.) oils. In Essential Oils in Food Preservation, Flavor and Safety; Elsevier: London, UK, 2016; pp. 325–338. [Google Scholar]
  147. Al-Maharik, N.; Jaradat, N.; Al-Hajj, N.; Jaber, S. Myrtus communis L.: Essential oil chemical composition, total phenols and flavonoids contents, antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer, and α-amylase inhibitory activity. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2023, 10, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Han, Y.; Sun, Z.; Chen, W. Antimicrobial susceptibility and antibacterial mechanism of limonene against Listeria monocytogenes. Molecules 2019, 25, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Dias, K.J.S.D.O.; Miranda, G.M.; Bessa, J.R.; Araújo, A.C.J.D.; Freitas, P.R.; Almeida, R.S.D.; Paulo, C.L.R.; Neto, J.B.D.A.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; Ribeiro-Filho, J. Terpenes as bacterial efflux pump inhibitors: A systematic review. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 953982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Gupta, A.; Jeyakumar, E.; Lawrence, R. Strategic approach of multifaceted antibacterial mechanism of limonene traced in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Han, Y.; Chen, W.; Sun, Z. Antimicrobial activity and mechanism of limonene against Staphylococcus aureus. J. Food Saf. 2021, 41, e12918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hodaj-Çeliku, E.; Tsiftsoglou, O.; Shuka, L.; Abazi, S.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D.; Lazari, D. Antioxidant activity and chemical composition of essential oils of some aromatic and medicinal plants from Albania. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2017, 12, 1934578X1701200525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Szczepanik, M.; Walczak, M.; Zawitowska, B.; Michalska-Sionkowska, M.; Szumny, A.; Wawrzeńczyk, C.; Brzezinska, M.S. Chemical composition, antimicromicrobial activity and insecticidal activity against the lesser mealworm Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer)(Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) of Origanum vulgare L. ssp. hirtum (Link) and Artemisia dracunculus L. essential oils. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Bouzouita, N.; Kachouri, F.; Hamdi, M.; Chaabouni, M.M. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils from Tunisian aromatic plants. Flavour Fragr. J. 2003, 18, 380–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Mot, M.-D.; Gavrilaș, S.; Lupitu, A.I.; Moisa, C.; Chambre, D.; Tit, D.M.; Bogdan, M.A.; Bodescu, A.-M.; Copolovici, L.; Copolovici, D.M. Salvia officinalis L. essential oil: Characterization, antioxidant properties, and the effects of aromatherapy in adult patients. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Zinno, P.; Guantario, B.; Lombardi, G.; Ranaldi, G.; Finamore, A.; Allegra, S.; Mammano, M.M.; Fascella, G.; Raffo, A.; Roselli, M. Chemical Composition and Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Origanum vulgare Genotypes Belonging to the Carvacrol and Thymol Chemotypes. Plants 2023, 12, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Elwira, S.; Marta, S.O.; Rafat, S.; Krystyna, S.W.; Grazyna, G. Natural terpenes influence the activity of antibiotics against isolated mycobacterium tuberculosis. Med. Princ. Pract. 2017, 26, 108–112. [Google Scholar]
  158. Freitas, P.R.; de Araújo, A.C.J.; Barbosa, C.R.; Muniz, D.F.; Tintino, S.R.; Ribeiro-Filho, J.; Siqueira Júnior, J.P.; de Sousa, G.R.; Coutinho, H.D.M. Inhibition of efflux pumps by monoterpene (α-pinene) and impact on Staphylococcus aureus resistance to tetracycline and erythromycin. Curr. Drug Metab. 2021, 22, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Buriani, A.; Fortinguerra, S.; Sorrenti, V.; Caudullo, G.; Carrara, M. Essential oil phytocomplex activity, a review with a focus on multivariate analysis for a network pharmacology-informed phytogenomic approach. Molecules 2020, 25, 1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Gilbert, B.; Alves, L. Synergy in plant medicines. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Abreu, A.C.; McBain, A.J.; Simoes, M. Plants as sources of new antimicrobials and resistance-modifying agents. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 1007–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Abreu, A.C.; Coqueiro, A.; Sultan, A.R.; Lemmens, N.; Kim, H.K.; Verpoorte, R.; Van Wamel, W.J.B.; Simões, M.; Choi, Y.H. Looking to nature for a new concept in antimicrobial treatments: Isoflavonoids from Cytisus striatus as antibiotic adjuvants against MRSA. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Dettweiler, M.; Melander, R.J.; Porras, G.; Risener, C.; Marquez, L.; Samarakoon, T.; Melander, C.; Quave, C.L. A clerodane diterpene from Callicarpa americana resensitizes methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-lactam antibiotics. ACS Infect. Dis. 2020, 6, 1667–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Russell, A.D. Bacterial resistance to disinfectants: Present knowledge and future problems. J. Hosp. Infect. 1999, 43, S57–S68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Prisma diagram illustrating the records and the filtering steps performed before the manual reviewing process of the abstracts.
Figure 1. Prisma diagram illustrating the records and the filtering steps performed before the manual reviewing process of the abstracts.
Microorganisms 11 02264 g001
Figure 2. Forest plot showing the representation of the average recorded MICs for each plant extract included in this study. The power (that is related to the number of studies considered) is indicated by the weight (size) of the box.
Figure 2. Forest plot showing the representation of the average recorded MICs for each plant extract included in this study. The power (that is related to the number of studies considered) is indicated by the weight (size) of the box.
Microorganisms 11 02264 g002
Figure 3. Forest plot showing the representation of the average recorded MICs for the most effective plant extracts included in this study. For the benefit of visualization purposes, the plants with the highest MICs were excluded from this plot. The power (that is related to the number of studies considered) is indicated by the weight (size) of the box.
Figure 3. Forest plot showing the representation of the average recorded MICs for the most effective plant extracts included in this study. For the benefit of visualization purposes, the plants with the highest MICs were excluded from this plot. The power (that is related to the number of studies considered) is indicated by the weight (size) of the box.
Microorganisms 11 02264 g003
Figure 4. Venn diagram (ChatGPT-aided) representing the combinations of commonly shared compounds among the three most effective essential oils against S. aureus.
Figure 4. Venn diagram (ChatGPT-aided) representing the combinations of commonly shared compounds among the three most effective essential oils against S. aureus.
Microorganisms 11 02264 g004
Table 1. List of plants growing in Italy producing extracts active against S. aureus [1].
Table 1. List of plants growing in Italy producing extracts active against S. aureus [1].
PathogenNumber of Active PlantsPlant Names and Reference
Staphylococcus aureus39Cinnamomum [14]; Cinnamomum camphora (L.) [15]; Cistus monspeliensis L. [16]; Cistus salviifolius L. [16]; Cytinus hypocistis (L.) L. [17]; Limonium morisianum Arrigoni [18]; Myrtus communis L. [19]; Origanum vulgare L. [20]; Pistacia lentiscus L. [21]; Pistacia terebinthus L. [22]; Rosmarinus officinalis L. [23]; Salvia officinalis L. [24]; Thymus herba-barona Loise L. [25]; Thymus vulgaris L. [26]; Inula crithmoides [27]; Caralluma europaea [28]; Crocus sativus [29]; Helichrysum araxinum [30]; Schinus molle (L.) [31]; Cannabis sativa [32]; Centaurium erythraea [33]; Citrus medica L., Citrus bergamia, and Citrus medica [34]; Laurus nobilis [35]; Rubus ulmifolius [36]; Malus domestica var. Annurca [37]; Teucrium genus (Germander) [38]; Daucus carota subsp. maximus (Desf.) [39]; Cytinus [40]; T. vulgaris, Satureja montana and Coriandrum sativum [41]; Garlic (Allium sativum L.) [42]; Thymus vulgaris L. [43]; Rapa Catozza Napoletana (Brassica rapa L. var. rapa DC.) [44]; Calycotome villosa (Poiret) [45]; Juniperus spp. [46]; Hyssopus officinalis [47]
Table 2. List of the number of records detected for each plant and filtered for inclusion and MICs annotation.
Table 2. List of the number of records detected for each plant and filtered for inclusion and MICs annotation.
PlantTotal Records for Each PlantRecords Included
Cinnamomum camphora238
Cistus monspeliensis74
Cistus salviifolius62
Cytinus hypocistis31
Myrtus communis6914
Origanum vulgare15938
Pistacia lentiscus324
Pistacia terebinthus72
Rosmarinus officinalis22075
Salvia officinalis1029
Laurus nobilis6013
Satureja montana158
Coriandrum sativum117
Garlic (Allium sativum L.)26321
Thymus vulgaris L.19648
Crocus sativus267
Schinus molle288
Cannabis sativa5314
Centaurium erythraea85
Citrus medica L.125
Citrus bergamia131
Table 3. Qualitative representation of the volatile compounds present in the EOs.
Table 3. Qualitative representation of the volatile compounds present in the EOs.
Salvia officinalisCistus monspeliensisMyrtus communis (Myrtle)
1,8-CineoleCamphene1,8-Cineole
BorneolEugenolGeraniol
CamphorGeraniolLimonene
LimoneneLimoneneLinalool
LinaloolNerolMethyl eugenol
α-HumuleneSabineneMyrtenol
α-Pineneα-PineneMyrtenyl acetate
α-Thujoneα-ThujoneNerol
β-Pineneβ-Pineneα-Pinene
β-Thujoneδ-3-Careneα-Terpineol
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oppedisano, F.; De Fazio, R.; Gugliandolo, E.; Crupi, R.; Palma, E.; Abbas Raza, S.H.; Tilocca, B.; Merola, C.; Piras, C.; Britti, D. Mediterranean Plants with Antimicrobial Activity against Staphylococcus aureus, a Meta-Analysis for Green Veterinary Pharmacology Applications. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092264

AMA Style

Oppedisano F, De Fazio R, Gugliandolo E, Crupi R, Palma E, Abbas Raza SH, Tilocca B, Merola C, Piras C, Britti D. Mediterranean Plants with Antimicrobial Activity against Staphylococcus aureus, a Meta-Analysis for Green Veterinary Pharmacology Applications. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(9):2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092264

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oppedisano, Francesca, Rosario De Fazio, Enrico Gugliandolo, Rosalia Crupi, Ernesto Palma, Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza, Bruno Tilocca, Carmine Merola, Cristian Piras, and Domenico Britti. 2023. "Mediterranean Plants with Antimicrobial Activity against Staphylococcus aureus, a Meta-Analysis for Green Veterinary Pharmacology Applications" Microorganisms 11, no. 9: 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092264

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop