Next Article in Journal
Effects of Resource Availability and Antibiotic Residues on Intestinal Antibiotic Resistance in Bellamya aeruginosa
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring Bacterial and Fungal Biodiversity in Eight Mediterranean Olive Orchards (Olea europaea L.) in Tunisia
Previous Article in Journal
The “Bald Disease” of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus: Pathogenicity, Molecular Identification of the Causative Agent and Therapeutic Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects on Pseudomonas plecoglossicida 2,4-D and Humic Substances on the Growth, Pigment Indices and Concentration of Hormones in Wheat Seedlings Grown under Water Deficit
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 Produces Nonactin and Possesses Insecticidal, Acaricidal, Antimicrobial and Plant Growth-Promoting Traits

1
All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection, Podbelskogo Sh. 3, Pushkin, Saint-Petersburg 196608, Russia
2
All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, Podbelskogo Sh. 3, Pushkin, Saint-Petersburg 196608, Russia
3
Alferov Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Education and Science Saint Petersburg National Research Academic University of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Khlopin Str., 8/3-A, Saint-Petersburg 194021, Russia
4
Research Center of Nanobiotechnologies, Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya, 29, Saint-Petersburg 195251, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(3), 764; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030764
Submission received: 24 February 2023 / Revised: 13 March 2023 / Accepted: 14 March 2023 / Published: 16 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Microbial and Plant Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
Streptomycetes produce a huge variety of bioactive metabolites, including antibiotics, enzyme inhibitors, pesticides and herbicides, which offer promise for applications in agriculture as plant protection and plant growth-promoting products. The aim of this report was to characterize the biological activities of strain Streptomyces sp. P-56, previously isolated from soil as an insecticidal bacterium. The metabolic complex was obtained from liquid culture of Streptomyces sp. P-56 as dried ethanol extract (DEE) and possessed insecticidal activity against vetch aphid (Medoura viciae Buckt.), cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii Glov.), green peach aphid (Myzus persicae Sulz.), pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harr.) and crescent-marked lily aphid (Neomyzus circumflexus Buckt.), as well as two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae). Insecticidal activity was associated with production of nonactin, which was purified and identified using HPLC-MS and crystallographic techniques. Strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 also showed antibacterial and antifungal activity against various phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi (mostly for Clavibacfer michiganense, Alternaria solani and Sclerotinia libertiana), and possessed a set of plant growth-promoting traits, such as auxin production, ACC deaminase and phosphate solubilization. The possibilities for using this strain as a biopesticide producer and/or biocontrol and a plant growth-promoting microorganism are discussed.

1. Introduction

The recent trends in the study of bioactive secondary microbial metabolites [1,2,3] show the increasing practical importance of this field. Particularly, the metabolites produced by actinomycetes (Actinomycetales) are very useful agents for pharmacology and agrobiology [4,5,6,7,8]. Microorganisms of the genus Streptomyces are widespread actinomycetes inhabiting the soil and associating with plants [9,10]. Secondary metabolic products of actinomycetes include a huge number of chemical structures. The majority of these compounds are antibiotics (antimicrobial, antitumor or antiviral agents), but other bioactive compounds (enzyme inhibitors, pharmacologically active substances, pesticides and herbicides) were also described [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Due to numerous important properties, the bioactive metabolites of actinomycetes offer promise for applications in agriculture as plant protection products. The problem of controlling the number of harmful arthropods at an environmentally safe level is associated with their high breeding potential, high prevalence and wide polyphagia, as well as very limited range of effective biocontrol products. Various biological insecticides, including those produced by streptomycetes, have established themselves as effective means of combating harmful insects, alternatively to synthetic chemicals [5,8,10,19]. They are characterized by greater specificity and lower toxicity for landscape biota, animals and humans, as well as higher ability to degrade in natural cycles of matter. However, for the effective use of biopesticides and the solution of related problems, such as the acquisition of pest resistance, it is necessary to deeply study the mechanisms underlying the action of the products and the producing microorganisms themselves [5,16].
Nonactin is a biologically active compound produced by several Streptomyces species [20,21,22,23], and is known as the macrotetrolide antibiotic consisting of four subunits in the form of nonactic acid [24,25]. Nonactic acid and/or its derivatives (monactin, dinactin, trinactin and tetranactin) possess antibacterial, antifungal, insecticidal and acaricidal activity [11,25,26,27]. It was also shown that Streptomyces globisporus produced nonactine and possessed insecticidal activity against Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) [20]. Growth inhibition of various pathogenic bacteria, particularly Agrobecterium tumefaciens, by Streptomyces cavourensis TN638 producing a mixture of nonactin with other derivatives of nonactic acid was described [28]. Tetranactin produced by several streptomycetes species caused growth inhibition of various bacteria and fungi, as well as acaricidal activity against two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) [11]. These reports show that the role of nonactin as an insecticidal and acaricidal agent has not been studied in detail.
The biological role of streptomycetes in relation to plants is diverse, varying from pathogenesis to mutualistic symbiosis [29,30]. The significance of streptomycetes as important plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) is actively debated [10,19,30,31]. In addition to biocontrol effects, the beneficial properties of streptomycetes for plants are associated with their ability to produce phytohormones auxins [32,33,34,35] and siderophores [36], to dissolve unavailable phosphates [37] and to have 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activity [38,39,40]. Streptomycetes quite often combine growth-promoting properties with antimicrobial activity, and in some cases with insecticidal [26,35] or acaricidal activity [11,26]. At the same time, they can also have negative properties for plants [29,30,31]. Therefore, for the successful application of these microorganisms, a comprehensive study of their properties is necessary.
The aim of this report was to characterize in detail the strain Streptomyces sp. P-56, previously isolated as an insecticidal agent (unpublished data), to identify its active insecticidal metabolite and to investigate its other beneficial or deleterious traits for plants. As a result, the possibility and prospects of using this strain as a biopreparation for plant protection and growth promotion were evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microorganism

The actinomycetal strain P-56 was initially isolated from red soil originating from rice fields of India, identified as Streptomyces loidensis P-56 using standard morphological and biochemical tests of numerical taxonomy [9,41] and characterized by high insecticidal activity against vetch aphid (Medoura viciae Buck.) (unpublished data). The strain P-56 was deposited in the State Collection of Entomopathogenic and Phytopathogenic Microorganisms and their Antagonists (SCEPMA, All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, http://vizrspb.ru/struktura-instituta/research/mikrobiologicheskoi-zashchity-rastenii; accessed on 1 January 2020). During the experimental work, the strain P-56 was maintained in the medium M19/6 (g L−1): corn extract–10, soluble potato starch–10, (NH4)2SO4–3, NaCl–3, CaCO3–3, microbiological agar, 20, pH = 7.2.

2.2. Identification of Strain P-56

In this study, the strain P-56 was identified by sequencing the 16S rRNA (rrs) gene using PCR primers fD1 (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and rD1 (5′-AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCC-3′) [42]. Isolation and purification of DNA, PCR reaction and electrophoresis were performed as previously described [43]. Sequencing was performed with a 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) using BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The obtained sequence was deposited to the NCBI GenBank database under accession number OP389215.1 and was aligned using pairwise Clustal W alignment and compared with the related sequences of the available type strains using BLAST analysis. Pictures of colonies and mycelium of the strain P-56 were performed by the stereomicroscope Stemi 508 (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

2.3. Obtaining Laboratory Sample of the Metabolic Complex

The laboratory sample of the metabolic complex was obtained from liquid culture of Streptomyces sp. P-56 in the form of the dried ethanol extract (DEE). For this purpose, the strain was cultivated on a rotary shaker (230 rpm) at 28 °C for 4 days in Erlenmeyer flasks containing 150 mL of liquid medium M5 (g L−1): glucose–10, soy flour–10, NaCl–5, CaCO3–3, pH = 7.2. The culture was centrifuged at room temperature for 15 min at 5000× g and the separated mycelium was extracted with ethanol for 1 h at constant stirring at 1500 rpm. The organic extract was separated from the mycelium by centrifugation for 20 min at 5000× g and 20 °C and concentrated on vacuum evaporator RE-501 (Lanphan, Zhengzhou, China) at 45 ÷ 55 °C and 0.03 ÷ 0.005 MPa up to 10 mL. The DEE concentrate was dried at 35 °C. As a result, a light brown thick paste having moisture of about 80% was obtained and stored at 8 °C for further experiments.

2.4. Insecticidal Activity of DEE

The contact insecticidal activity in vitro of Streptomyces sp. P-56 was determined under laboratory conditions against vetch aphid (Medoura viciae Buckt.), cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii Glov.), green peach aphid (Myzus persicae Sulz.), pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harr.) and crescent-marked lily aphid (Neomyzus circumflexus Buckt.). Populations of harmful arthropods were bred and maintained under laboratory conditions using common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variety Russian Black plants. Filter paper was placed into Petri dishes (40 mm in diameter) and moisturized with 3 mL of water diluted DEE in a range of concentrations from 0.5 to 10 g L−1. Test insects (20 individuals of each insect per replicate, 5 replicates per DEE concentration) were placed into the dishes and incubated at 24 °C. The percentage of dead insects was estimated relative to untreated controls after 2, 4, 6 and 24 h. The results were subjected to a probit analysis to determine the LC50, LC90 and LC98 values of DEE toxicity.
The experiment to assess the insecticidal activity in vivo against green peach aphid was carried out using bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivar Lastochka. For this purpose, young plants were infected with peach aphid and cultivated in a greenhouse under controlled environment conditions. Immediately after the number of aphids on each plant were counted, the plants were treated with water suspension of 2 g L−1 DEE or with 1 g L−1 of Confidor® Extra (Bater AG, Leverkusen, Germany) containing imidacloprid (CAS138261-41-3) using a laboratory sprayer Marolex Profession 5 (Dziekanów Leśny, Marolex, Poland). Control plants were treated with tap water. The counting of live insects on each plant (4 plants per treatment) was carried out after 24 h.

2.5. Isolation and Purification of the Toxin

Preparative chromatographic separation of DEE was performed on silica gel (Merck 60) using MPLC system Buchi Sepacore (Büchi Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland) completed UV-Monitor C-630, two Pump Module C-605, Control Unit S-620, fractions collector C-660. The solvents were (A) n-hexane, (B) EtOAc and (C) MeOH. About 150 mg of DEE was dissolved in 10 mL of methanol and sorbed into 3 g of silica gel. The resulting material was introduced into the upper part of the Glass Column Buchi 15/230, filled with the same silica gel and preconditioned in the flow of hexane (15 mL/min for 5 min). Chromatography conditions: flow rate 15 mL/min; detection was carried out at a wavelength of 254 nm.
Purity and the composition of fractions were estimated by UPLC method using the Acquity H-class chromatograph (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) with PDA detector and Xevo TQD MS-detector. Then insecticidal activity in vitro of the compound 1 was verified using vetch aphid as described above.

2.6. Identification of the Toxin

Melting point determination was performed on a PTP-M apparatus (Khimlabpribor, Klin, Russia). The infrared (IR) spectrum was recorded in CHCl3 on a Specord 75IR spectrometer (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany) and the ultraviolet (UV) spectrum was recorded in EtOH on a Beckman Coulter DU 800 spectrometer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA). 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a Varian DirectDrive NMR System (Varian, Palo Aho, CA, USA) in CDCl3 at 700 and/or 175.8 MHz. CDCl3 was used as an internal standard. Mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization MS (ESI) was performed using LC-MS high-resolution spectrometer MaXis (ESI-QTOF) (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), with direct injections of sample solutions into the ionization chamber. X-ray diffraction was measured on Kappa Apex II device (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) by use of CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). Intensity of reflexes was integrated and scaled by means of the Saint and Sadabs programs from an Apex II package (Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, USA). All subsequent procedures for the decision and specification of the compound structure were held in the software package of Olex2 (https://www.olexsys.org/olex2/, accessed on 1 January 2020) [44].

2.7. Method of Growing Crystals for X-ray Analysis

To obtain crystals for X-ray diffraction, the obtained nonactin was dissolved in acetonitrile at a concentration of 4 mg/mL at a temperature of 45 °C; next, the solution was slowly cooled down to 4 °C in a Thermos bottle. Elongated crystals of 0.1–0.2 mm were usually formed on day 2–3. For X-ray diffraction, a single 0.02 × 0.02 × 0.2 mm crystal was extracted using a special loop, mounted on a goniometer, and frozen in a 100 K nitrogen-cooled stream.

2.8. Acaricidal Activity of DEE

Fresh leaves of common bean variety Russian Black were placed on cotton rafts in pallets with water, and each leaf was infected with 10 two-spotted spider mites (Tetranychus urticae). Then, leaves were sprayed with water suspensions of DEE in concentrations ranging from 1.25 to 10 g L−1 using a laboratory sprayer Mercury PRO+ (Kwazar Corporation, Budy Grzybek, Poland). Control leaves were treated with tap water. An aqueous solution of the commercial biopreparation Fitoverm (Farmbiomed, Russia) in a concentration 2 g L−1 of active substance Aversectin-C (CAS73989-17-0) was used as a positive control according to manufacturer’s instructions. Six leaves were prepared for each treatment located on individual cotton rafts. After the rafts were incubated in a greenhouse for 24 h, the number of alive spider mites was counted on each leaf.

2.9. Antifungal and Antibacterial Activity of Strain P-56

The antagonistic properties of Streptomyces sp. P-56 were determined by the well diffusion method as previously described [17]. Twenty test microorganisms, including various species of bacteria and fungi obtained from the SCEPMA, were used, and are described in Table 1. The diameter of the growth inhibition zones of the test microorganisms induced by Streptomyces sp. P-56 was measured after 5 days of inoculation at 28 °C.

2.10. Acetylene Reduction Activity of Strain P-56

Acetylene reduction (nitrogen-fixing) activity of Streptomyces sp. P-56 was determined using the acetylene reduction assay [45]. Briefly, the strain was cultivated in flasks (n = 3) containing 50 mL liquid MDF medium for 5 days at 24 °C. The composition of MDF medium was as follows (g L−1): glucose, 1; sucrose, 1; gluconic acid, 1; citric acid, 1; malic acid, 1; mannitol, 1; starch, 0.5; KH2PO4, 2; Na2HPO4, 3; MgSO4, 0.2; NaCl, 0.1; pH 6.8. Then, the flasks were closed with rubber stoppers, and 10% of the gas phase was replaced with acetylene and incubated for 1 day. Reduction of acetylene to ethylene was measured using gas chromatograph GC-2014 (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan).

2.11. Phytohormone Production by Strain P-56

Strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 was grown in vials with 5 mL of Chapek (three replicates) liquid medium amended with 1% L-tryptophan for 5 days at 24 °C. To determine phytohormones (auxins, abscisic acid, salicylic acid, gibberellic acid GA3), the culture was centrifuged at 11,000× g for 15 min and the supernatants were acidified to pH 3.0 with 0.4 N hydrochloric acid and extracted with equal volumes of ethyl acetate. The organic phase containing phytohormones was evaporated to dryness under vacuum at 35 °C and suspended in 0.5 mL of 18% acetonitrile. All obtained samples were filtered through 0.22 μm Costar® Spin-X® microtubes with nylon membrane filters (Sigma-Aldrich Int. GMBH) prior to chromatographic analysis. Uninoculated medium was used as a control. Phytohormones were separated on Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH RP18 Shield (1.7 µm, 2.1 × 50 mm) column (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) in mixture of 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile supplied with 0.1% formic acid (B) at flow rate 0.3 mL min-1 with isocratic elution in 18% B for 5 min, followed by washing with 80% B for 2 min and conditioning the column for 3 min at 18% B. Auxins and salicylic acid were detected with fluorescence detector (ƛex = 280 nm, ƛem = 350 nm for auxins; ƛex = 300 nm, ƛem = 405 nm for salicylic acid). Gibberellic acid GA3 and abscisic acid were detected with Waters eλPDA Detector at wavelengths of 208 and 265 nm, respectively.

2.12. Utilization of ACC by Strain P-56

Strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 was cultivated on a liquid salt minimal (SM) medium [46] containing no nitrogen source (negative control treatment) and supplemented with 250 mg L−1 NH4NO3 (positive control treatment) or with 250 mg L−1 ACC. Bacteria were cultivated using shaking at 200 rpm for 5 days at 28 °C. Then, the obtained suspensions (2 replicates per treatment) were intensively vortexed, and optical density (OD) was measured at 600 nm using spectrophotometer SmartSpec Plus (Bio-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.13. Solubilization of Phosphates by Strain P-56

Phosphate solubilization activity was determined as described previously [47]. Strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 was cultivated on modified Pikovskaya (PKV) agar medium containing (g L−1): glucose, 5; fructose, 5; yeast extract, 0.5; (NH4)2SO4, 0.5; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.1; KCl, 0.2; NaCl, 0.2; MnSO4·4H2O, 0.02; FeSO4·7H2O, 0.02; agar, 15; pH 7.0. The PKV medium was supplemented with P source (5 g L−1): Ca3(PO4)2, Ca-phytate), AlPO4 or FePO4. The plates were spot-inoculated (3 replicates per P source) and incubated at 25 °C for 7 days. Diameter of visible halo zones around colonies was measured.

2.14. Production of Siderophores by Strain P-56

Siderophore production was determined using a chrome azurol S (CAS) shuttle solution as previously described [48]. The assay was calibrated by generating a standard curve for samples containing 1 to 100 µM deferoxamine mesylate (DFM).

2.15. Bioassay with Plants

Strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 was cultivated on a liquid medium M5 for 5 days at 28 °C, supernatant was obtained after centrifugation of the culture for 15 min at 5000× g and mycelium was suspended in sterile tap water with a final concentration of 107 colony forming units per mL. Seeds of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) variety Samson and watercress (Nasturtium officinale W.T.Aiton) variety Zabava were surface-sterilized by treatment with 5% sodium hypochlorite for 15 min. One part of seeds was placed into vials containing sterile tap water (control treatment), supernatant of Streptomyces sp. P-56 or solution of 2 g L−1 DEE and soaked for 2 h at 22 °C. Then, the seeds were transferred to Petri dishes (four dishes with 20 seeds per treatment) with wet filter paper. Another part of seeds was transferred to Petri dishes (4 dishes with 20 seeds per treatment) with filter paper wetted with sterile tap water or suspension of mycelium. All Petri dishes were incubated for 5 days at 22 °C. Then, the number of germinated seeds, the main root length and the root number on barley were determined.

2.16. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the software STATISTICA version 10 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). MANOVA analysis with Fisher’s LSD test, Student’s t-test and Probit analysis were used to evaluate differences between means and to estimate significance of the effects.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Strain P-56

The sequence of the strain P-56 showed very high percent identity (PI) with sequences of several types of strain belonging to different species of the genus Streptomyces, namely the St. arboris strain TRM68085 (PI = 100.00%; NZ_VYUA01000026.1), St. cyaneofuscatus strain NRRL B-2570 (PI = 99.93%; NZ_JOEM01000050.1), St. fulvorobeus strain DSM 41455 (PI = 99.93%; NZ_JACCCF010000001.1), St. albovinaceus strain NRRL B-2566 (99.86%; NZ_MUAX01000176.1), St. rubiginosohelvolus strain JCM 4415 (PI = 99.86%; NZ_BMTW01000038.1), St. griseolus strain NRRL B-2925 (PI = 99.79%; NZ_JOFC01000069.1) and St. californicus strain FDAARGOS (PI = 99.79%; NZ_CP070242.1). Therefore, the studied microorganism was assigned as Streptomyces sp. strain P-56. Characteristic pictures of colonies and mycelium of the strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 are present in Figure 1.

3.2. Insecticidal Activity

Under in vitro conditions, treatment of various aphid species with DEE caused mortality from 60% to 100%, depending on the test insects and concentration of DEE (Table 2). The most sensitive to the treatment with DEE was A. gossypii, whereas A. pisum showed a maximum resistance relative to other species (Table 2). The death of aphids was accompanied by the following pathological symptoms: difficulties in moving, paling and yellowing of the cuticle, slight swelling of the body, more brittle and brittle limbs and complete paralysis in the end of experiment. The insect covers had acquired a yellowish hue; the abdomen was swollen and acquired an oily sheen. The broken limbs were observed, suggesting the increase in their fragility.
Treatment of peach aphids on the infected bell pepper leaves in vivo caused 89% mortality of this pest within 24 h (Figure 2). Insecticidal activity of DEE was comparable with the effect of Confidor® Extra causing 98% mortality of peach aphids.

3.3. Isolation and Structural Identification of the Active Substance

The obtained DEE from Streptomyces sp. P-56 mycelium was subjected to chromatographic separation by MPLC, as shown in the Materials and Methods section. The gradient chromatographic mode and procedure of selection of the fractions are shown in Table 3.
The obtained fractions were tested for insecticidal activity in vitro against vetch aphid, as described above. Fractions 4÷8 showed insecticidal activity with a maximum activity of fraction 5. HPLC-MS studies showed that all active fractions contained the same major component with a molecular weight of 736. Recrystallization of the obtained fractions from ethanol gave 49.5 mg of white crystalline substance, which was identified as compound 1.
As a result, a white crystalline compound 1 was obtained and showed high toxicity against vetch aphid (mortality rate 92%) after treatment with 1 mg L−1 water solution for 2 h. The results of the chemical structure identification of compound 1 obtained by NMR methods, including both one-dimensional 1H (Figure 3A) and 13C (Figure 3B), as well as two-dimensional (HSQC, HMBC, C2H2QC, TOCSY) experiments, indicated the structure of a lactone nature.
However, based on the data of high-resolution mass spectroscopy, compound 1 should have a molecular weight of 737.44, which corresponds to its tetramer. The spectral card of compound 1 was as follows: (1R,2R,5R,7R,10S,11S,14S,16S,19R,20R,23R,25R,28S,29S,32S,34S)-2,5,11,14,20,23,29,32-Octamethyl-4,13,22,31,37,38,39,40-octaoxapentacyclo [32.2.1.17,10.116,19.125,28]tetracontane-3,12,21,30-tetrone: mp: 144–146 °C.1H NMR: 4.96 (4H, ddq, J = 7.8, 6.2, 5.6 Hz, H-8), 4.00 (4H, ddd, J = 7.5, 7.2, 7.2 Hz, H-3), 3.84 (4H, ddd, J = 13.6, 7.5, 5.9 Hz, H-6), 2.49 (4H, dq, J = 7.1, 7.2 Hz, H-2), 1.98 (4H, m, H-5a), 1.92 (4H, m, H-4a), 1.77 (4H, ddd, J = 13.7, 7.8, 5.9 Hz H-7a), 1.72 (4H, ddd, J = 13.7, 7.5, 5.6 Hz, H-7b), 1.61 (4H, m, H-4b), 1.48 (4H, m, H-5b), 1.22 (12H, d, J = 6.2, H-9), 1.08 (12H, d, J = 7.1, H-10). 13C NMR: 176.9 (C-1, C(O) = O), 82.7 (C-3, C–O), 79.0 (C-6, C–O), 71.7 (C-8, C–O), 47.9 (C-2), 44.9 (C-7), 34.0 (C-5), 30.8 (C-4), 23.1 (C-9, CH3), 15.5 (C-10, CH3). ESI–TOF MS m/z (relative intensity): 738.4505 (C40H65O12, calcd 738.4512) [M + H + 1]+ (30), 737.4474 (C40H65O12, calcd 737.4479) [M + H]+ (60). Based on the obtained spectral characteristics and the data available in the literature [49,50], we assumed that the isolated compound 1 is nonactin.
Nonactin has 16 chiral centers; therefore, it was necessary to confirm the configuration of the molecule of the isolated compound 1 for completing structural identification. Summarized results of X-ray data acquisition and processing are given in Table 4. As a result, the structure of nonactin was obtained (Figure 4) and confirmed that compound 1 is nonactin.
Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the obtained structures were deposited to the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) as supplementary publication No 1893406 CCDC. A copy of the data can be obtained on application to the CCDC ([email protected]).
Insecticidal activity in vitro of the obtained nonactin was verified using vetch aphid. The nonactin was very toxic for vetch aphids (Figure 5) and its insecticidal activity was comparable with DEE (Table 2, Figure 2).

3.4. Acaricidal Activity

Treatment with 1.25 g L−1 DDE was toxic for two-spotted spider mites, resulting in 56% mortality, whereas treatment with 2.5 g L−1 DDE caused almost compete mortality of this pest, and the effect was comparable with commercial Fitoverm (2.0 g Aversectin-C L−1) treatment (Table 5). DEE induced the following pathological symptoms: partial and then complete paralysis of the spider mites, resulting in their death. The color of the cuticle of the dead ticks had a darker shade. The dead individuals were mummified, apparently due to the loss of moisture through the integument.

3.5. Antagonistic Properties

The strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 inhibited the growth of 5 out of 8 bacterial test strains and 8 out of 12 fungal strains (Table 1). Maximal diameter of the growth-inhibiting zone was observed for the bacterium Clavibacfer michiganense subsp. michiganense VIZR-13a as well as for the fungi Alternaria solani VIZR-32 and Sclerotinia libertiana VIZR-32-1.

3.6. Plant Growth-Promoting Traits

The strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 produced the phytohormones indolil-3-acetic (24 ± 4 µg mL−1), indolyl-3-carboxylic (46 ± 1 µg mL−1), indolyl-3-lactic (28 ± 3 µg mL−1) and salicylic (14 ± 5 µg mL−1) acids, but did not produce abscisic and gibberellic acids. No acetylene reduction (nitrogen fixation) activity or endogenous ethylene production was detected in the culture of Streptomyces sp. P-56. Active growth of Streptomyces sp. P-56 was observed in a selective SM medium containing ACC as a sole nitrogen source (OD600 = 1.3 ± 0.1), and its growth was similar in the presence of mineral nitrogen (OD600 = 1.1 ± 0.1). This suggested that the strain possesses ACC deaminase activity. A halo zone around the colony of Streptomyces sp. P-56 was detected only in the presence of Ca-phytate (diameter 4 ± 0.5 mm). However, this strain did not produce siderophores.

3.7. Biotests with Plants

Treatments of barley and watercress seeds with supernatant of Streptomyces sp. P-56 or DEE had no effect on the seed germination of barley and watercress (Table 6). Control seedlings of barley had longer roots by 18% compared to those treated with the supernatant, but the root length of watercress was not affected by either treatment. The seed germination and root lengths of either plant species were not affected by DEE treatment (Table 6).
Decreased root and shoot elongation was observed when watercress seeds were inoculated with live mycelium of Streptomyces sp. P-56 (Figure 6A). However, inoculation had no effect on the elongation of barley roots and shoots (Figure 6B), as well as on the root number. Negative effects on roots of both plant species, such as discoloration, necrosis and other lesions, were not detected.

4. Discussion

Antibiotic nonactin was firstly isolated from mycelium of Streptomyces viridochromogenes [51]. Until 1991, nonactin had been found in six more species of the genus Streptomuces [20]. In recent years, this list has expanded due to the species St. cavourensis [28] and several unidentified Streptomyces spp. [21,22]. Growth inhibition of pathogenic bacteria Agrobecterium tumefaciens, Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus by nonactin-producing St. cavourensis TN638 was described [28]. Antimicrobial effects of nonactic acid produced by several strains of Streptomyces were also reported [11,26,27]. Here, we demonstrate that nonactin-producing Streptomyces sp. P-56 possesses antagonistic activity against Bacillus subtilis, Clavibacfer michiganense, Erwinia caratovora, Streptomyces globisporus, Xanthomonas campestris and a number of phytopathogenic fungi belonging to various taxonomic groups (Table 1).
Information about insecticidal activity of streptomycetes via nonactin production is very limited. Namely, St. globisporus strain 0234 showed insecticidal activity against Colorado potato beetle [20]. Nonactic acid (precursor of nonactin) was also highly toxic for Colorado potato beetle, Mexican bean beetle (Epilachna varivestis) and brown-tail moth (Euproctis chrysorhoea) [26]. Our results made it possible to substantially fill this gap, demonstrating the toxicity of DEE obtained from Streptomyces sp. P-56 against five aphid species, and proving that nonactin is an active compound causing the death of these insects (Table 2). Previously, acaricidal activity (LC50 = 2 mg mL−1) was observed after treatment of Tetranychus cinnabarinus, T. kanzawa and T. urticae with a mixture of nonactic and homononactic acids [26]. Acaricidal effects of tetranactin against T. urticae and Tyrophagus dimidiatus were also described [11]. This is the first report demonstrating acaricidal activity against T. urticae of nonactin-producing streptomycetes, namely the strain Streptomyces sp. P-56.
Macrotetralids, including nonactin, are membrane-active compounds that violate the permeability of the membranes, particularly blocking the activity of potassium channels and inducing disturbance to the transport of ions into cells [11,25,52]. As a consequence, violation of oxidative phosphorylation, ATP hydrolysis, swelling of mitochondria, lysis of zoospores and other toxic effects were observed [11,53]. These mechanisms of action of macrotetralids may be a partial explanation for the wide spectrum of action on various organisms, including prokaryotic fungi, insects and mites.
Obtaining high-quality nonactin crystals and their X-ray diffraction analysis are associated with certain difficulties, which were previously described in detail [54]. In particular, nonactin crystals without metal ions have a primitive monoclinic cell with twinning. At that, the asymmetric part of the crystal cell contains two unbounded halves of the nonactin molecule, slightly different in conformation. Here, we used an original method of growing nonactin crystals (see Materials and Methods section). The problem for determination of the structure of nonactin molecule in the crystallographic group P2/n was solved using the SHELXT [55] software and clarification of its structure was carried out taking into account the twinning [56]. As a result, a high-quality nonactin crystal was obtained without the use of metal ions, and its X-ray diffraction analysis was performed.
Streptomycetes are well-known plant-associated microorganisms having a number of contradictory (phytopathogenic and plant growth-promoting) properties [10,19,29,30,31]. Therefore, it was important to investigate the traits of Streptomyces sp. P-56 related to plant–microbe interactions. Apart from antagonistic activity against phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi, this strain possessed beneficial properties, such as the production of auxins and the utilization of ACC and solubilization of Ca-phytate. Our results confirmed that rhizosphere bacteria of the genus Streptomyces could be considered as PGPB. Indeed, auxin production [32,33,34,35], ACC deaminase activity [38,39,40,57] and phosphate solubilization (Jog-2014) were described for various plant-associated streptomycetes. The combination of plant growth-promoting traits with antimicrobial [37], insecticidal [26,35] or acaricidal activity [11,26] was also reported. At the same time, the strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 did not promote plant growth in the bioassay with watercress and barley, and even DEE treatment reduced the root elongation of barley (Table 6), and leaf cells reduced the elongation of watercress seedlings (Figure 6). We expected increased root elongation induced by leaf cells of Streptomyces sp. P-56, since this is a biotest for the evaluation of growth-promoting activity by bacteria containing ACC deaminase [58,59]. It is possible that such a plant response was associated with some unknown compounds produced by Streptomyces sp. P-56 and inhibiting elongation. It is known that some phytopathogenic Streptomyces species synthesize phytotoxins [60]. Interestingly, decreased root elongation of watercress was observed only when the plants were inoculated with live mycelium, but was absent after treatment with DEE. The results suggested that production of the growth-inhibiting compound was induced by the plant. On the other hand, St. griseus produced nonactic acid and stimulated elongation of cucumber shoot, whereas root growth was unaffected [26]. It is likely that the plant’s response to inoculation with streptomycetes depends on the concentration of substances produced by them and the activity of bacterial enzymes under the conditions of plant–microbe association. More detailed study is required to understand the effect of Streptomyces sp. P-56 on plant growth and to evaluate the possibility for using this strain as a biopesticide producer and/or a biocontrol microorganism.

5. Conclusions

The strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 has a wide range of biological activity, which is expressed in the growth inhibition of various phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi, high toxicity to various aphid species and also in the manifestation of acaricidal activity against two-spotted spider mites. Insecticidal activity of this strain was associated with the production of nonactin, which was found in the metabolic complex, extracted with DEE, purified and identified using HPLC-MS and crystallographic techniques. Antimicrobial and acaricidal activities of Streptomyces sp. P-56 could be also associated with nonactin; however, more detailed study is needed to prove this hypothesis. It should be noted that information about toxic effects of pure nonactin on microorganisms, insects, mites and plants is limited, and this makes it difficult to interpret the results. The obtained results of bioassay with plants suggest that this strain can produce unknown growth-inhibiting substances, particularly when bacteria interact with plants. At the same time, Streptomyces sp. P-56 possesses a set of plant growth-promoting traits, such as the inhibition of phytopathogens, production of auxins, utilization of ACC and solubilization of organic phosphates. These properties can probably be manifested when plants are inoculated with this strain under natural conditions, as a result of which a biocontrol (against microorganisms, insects, and mites) and growth-stimulating effect can be expected. To verify this speculation, it is necessary to carry out vegetative and field experiments.

Author Contributions

Investigation, I.B.; O.Y., P.U., I.E., A.S. and A.Y.; resources, I.B. and I.N.; validation, A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, I.B. and O.Y.; writing—review and editing, A.B.; funding acquisition, A.B.; methodology, O.Y. and I.N.; supervision, I.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the project “Mobilization of the genetic resources of microorganisms on the basis of the RCAM at the ARRIAM” (№ 075-15-2021-1055, 28 September 2021).

Data Availability Statement

Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the obtained structures were deposited to the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) as supplementary publication No 1893406 CCDC. A copy of the data can be obtained on application to the CCDC ([email protected]).

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by using scientific equipment of the Research resource center “Molecular and Cell Technologies” of the Saint-Petersburg State University, the Core Centrum “Genomic Technologies, Proteomics and Cell Biology” of the ARRIAM, the Center of Shared Usage “The analytical center of nano- and biotechnologies of SPbPU” and the Unique scientific installation the State Collection of Microorganisms of the VIZR (WFCC WDCM 760).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Maithani, D.; Sharma, A.; Gangola, S.; Choudhary, P.; Bhatt, P. Insights into applications and strategies for discovery of microbial bioactive metabolites. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 261, 127053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ossai, J.; Khatabi, B.; Nybo, S.E.; Kharel, M.K. Renewed interests in the discovery of bioactive actinomycete metabolites driven by emerging technologies. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 132, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yuzikhin, O.S.; Shaposhnikov, A.I.; Konnova, T.A.; Syrova, D.S.; Hamo, H.; Ermekkaliev, T.S.; Shevchenko, V.P.; Shevchenko, K.V.; Gogoleva, N.E.; Nizhnikov, A.A.; et al. Isolation and characterization of 1-Hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-4-oxo-2-cyclohexene-1-acetic acid, a metabolite in bacterial transformation of abscisic acid. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Copping, L.G.; Menn, J.J. Biopesticides: A review of their action, applications and efficacy. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2000, 56, 651–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chattopadhyay, P.; Banerjee, G.; Mukherjee, S. Recent trends of modern bacterial insecticides for pest control practice in integrated crop management system. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Dewi, T.K.; Agustiani, D.; Antonius, S. Secondary metabolites production by actinomycetes and their antifungal activity. KnE Life Sci. 2017, 3, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Salwan, R.; Sharma, V. Molecular and biotechnological aspects of secondary metabolites in actinobacteria. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 231, 126374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mingbo, Q.U.; Merzendorfer, H.; Moussian, B.; Yang, Q. Bioinsecticides as future mainstream pest control agents: Opportunities and challenges. Fron. Agr Sci. Eng. 2022, 9, 82–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zenova, G.M. Soil Actinomycetes; Publishing House of Moscow State University: Moscow, Russia, 1992; p. 78. ISBN 5-211-02902-X. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  10. Olanrewaju, O.S.; Babalola, O.O. Streptomyces: Implications and interactions in plant growth promotion. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 1179–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zizka, Z. Biological effects of macrotetrolide antibiotics and nonactic acids. Folia Microbiol. 1998, 43, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Watve, M.G.; Tickoo, R.; Jog, M.M.; Bhole, B.D. How many antibiotics are produced by the genus Streptomyces? Arch. Microbiol. 2001, 176, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Degtyareva, E.A.; Vinogradova, K.A.; Alexandrova, A.V.; Filonenko, V.A.; Kozhevin, P.A. Soil streptomycetes as potential biofungicides. Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 2009, 64, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Waksman, S.A.; Schatz, A.; Reynods, D.M. Production of antibiotic substances by actinomycetes. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1213, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Procópio, R.E.; Silva, I.R.; Martins, M.K.; Azevedo, J.L.; Araújo, J.M. Antibiotics produced by Streptomyces. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 16, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Siegwart, M.; Graillot, B.; Blachere Lopez, C.; Besse, S.; Bardin, M.; Nicot, P.C.; Lopez-Ferber, M. Resistance to bio-insecticides or how to enhance their sustainability: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Belakhov, V.V.; Boikova, I.V.; Novikova, I.I.; Kolodyaznya, V.A. Results of examination of the biological activity of nonmedical antibiotics with a view to finding environmentally friendly pesticides for plant protection. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2018, 88, 2982–2989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Katarzyn, J.; Aexander, R.; Guspiel, A.; Ziemskaj, O.J. Secondary metabolites of actinomycetes and their antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral properties. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2018, 67, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pavlyusin, V.A.; Novikova, I.I.; Boikova, I.V. Microbiological control in phytosanitary optimization technologies for agroecosystems: Research and practice (review). Agric. Biol. 2020, 55, 421–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jizba, J.; Sedmera, P.; Zima, J.; Beran, M.; Blumauerová, M.; Kandybin, N.V.; Samoukina, G.V. Macrotetrolide antibiotics produced by Streptomyces globisporus. Folia Microbiol. 1991, 36, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Crevelin, E.J.; Crotti, A.E.; Zucchi, T.D.; Melo, I.S.; Moraes, L.A. Dereplication of Streptomyces sp. AMC 23 polyether ionophore antibiotics by accurate-mass electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2014, 49, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Harinantenaina Rakotondraibe, L.; Rasolomampianina, R.; Park, H.Y.; Li, J.; Slebodnik, C.; Brodie, P.J.; Blasiak, L.C.; Hill, R.; TenDyke, K.; Shen, Y.; et al. Antiproliferative and antiplasmodial compounds from selected Streptomyces species. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 5646–5649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zhan, Y.; Zheng, S. Efficient production of nonactin by Streptomyces griseus subsp. griseus. Can. J. Microbiol. 2016, 62, 711–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kusche, B.R.; Phillips, J.B.; Priestley, N.D. Nonactin biosynthesis: Setting limits on what can be achieved with precursor-directed biosynthesis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1233–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Hu, J.; Zhang, J.; He, J. Structures, synthesis and biological activities of nonactic acid and its derivatives. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, 28, 8673–8691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jizba, J.; Přikrylová, V.; Ujhelyiová, L.; Varkonda, Š. Insecticidal properties of nonactic acid and homononactic acid, the precursors of macrotetrolide antibiotics. Folia Microbiol. 1992, 37, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jizba, J.; Skibová, I. Regulation of biosynthesis of pesticidal metabolic complexes in Streptomyces griseus. Folia Microbiol. 1994, 39, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaaniche, F.; Hamed, A.; Elleuch, L.; Chakchouk-Mtibaa, A.; Smaoui, S.; Karray-Rebai, I.; Koubaa, I.; Arcile, G.; Allouche, N.; Mellouli, L. Purification and characterization of seven bioactive compounds from the newly isolated Streptomyces cavourensis TN638 strain via solid-state fermentation. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 142, 104106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schrey, S.D.; Tarkka, M.T. Friends and foes: Streptomycetes as modulators of plant disease and symbiosis. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2008, 94, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Seipke, R.F.; Kaltenpoth, M.; Hutchings, M.I. Streptomyces as symbionts: An emerging and widespread theme? FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 862–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Viaene, T.; Langendries, S.; Beirinckx, S.; Maes, M.; Goormachtig, S. Streptomyces as a plant’s best friend? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Aldesuquy, H.S.; Mansour, F.A.; Abo-Hamed, S.A. Effect of the culture filtrates of Streptomyces on growth and productivity of wheat plants. Folia Microbiol. 1998, 43, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dimkpa, C.; Svatos, A.; Merten, D.; Büchel, G.; Kothe, E. Hydroxamate siderophores produced by Streptomyces acidiscabies E13 bind nickel and promote growth in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) under nickel stress. Can. J. Microbiol. 2008, 54, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gopalakrishnan, S.; Vadlamudi, S.; Bandikinda, P.; Sathya, A.; Vijayabharathi, R.; Rupela, O.; Kudapa, H.; Katta, K.; Varshney, R.K. Evaluation of Streptomyces strains isolated from herbal vermicompost for their plant growth-promotion traits in rice. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kaur, T.; Manhas, R.K. Antifungal, insecticidal, and plant growth promoting potential of Streptomyces hydrogenans DH16. J. Basic Microbiol. 2014, 54, 1175–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Terra, L.; Ratcliffe, N.; Castro, H.C.; Vicente, A.C.P.; Dyson, P. Biotechnological potential of Streptomyces siderophores as new antibiotics. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, 28, 1407–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jog, R.; Pandya, M.; Nareshkumar, G.; Rajkumar, S. Mechanism of phosphate solubilization and antifungal activity of Streptomyces spp. isolated from wheat roots and rhizosphere and their application in improving plant growth. Microbiology 2014, 160 Pt 4, 778–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Anwar, S.; Ali, B.; Sajid, I. Screening of rhizospheric actinomycetes for various in-vitro and in-vivo plant growth promoting (PGP) traits and for agroactive compounds. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Alwahshi, K.J.; Purayil, G.P.; Saeed, E.E.; Abufarajallah, H.A.; Aldhaheri, S.J.; AbuQamar, S.F.; El-Tarabily, K.A. The 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase-producing Streptomyces violaceoruber UAE1 can provide protection from sudden decline syndrome on date palm. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 904166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gopalakrishnan, S.; Srinivas, V.; Chand, U.; Pratyusha, S.; Samineni, S. Streptomyces consortia-mediated plant growth-promotion and yield performance in chickpea. 3 Biotech 2022, 12, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Holt, J.G. (Ed.) Bergey’s Mannual of Determinative Bacteriology, 9th ed.; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1994; p. 787. ISBN 13 978-0683006032. [Google Scholar]
  42. Weisburg, W.G.; Barns, S.M.; Pelletier, D.A.; Lane, D.J. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Safronova, V.; Belimov, A.; Sazanova, A.; Chirak, E.; Kuznetsova, I.; Andronov, E.; Pinaev, A.; Tsyganova, A.; Seliverstova, E.; Kitaeva, A.; et al. Two broad host range rhizobial strains isolated from relict legumes have various complementary effects on symbiotic parameters of co-inoculated plants. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rennie, R.J. A single medium for the isolation of acetylene-reducing (nitrogen-fixing) bacteria from soils. Can. J. Microbiol. 1981, 27, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Belimov, A.A.; Hontzeas, N.; Safronova, V.I.; Demchinskaya, S.V.; Piluzza, G.; Bullitta, S.; Glick, B.R. Cadmium-tolerant plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with the roots of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern.). Soil Biol. Biochem. 2005, 37, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Brazhnikova, Y.V.; Shaposhnikov, A.I.; Sazanova, A.L.; Belimov, A.A.; Mukasheva, T.D.; Ignatova, L.V. Phosphate mobilization by culturable fungi and their capacity to increase soil p availability and promote barley growth. Curr. Microbiol. 2022, 79, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Schwyn, B.; Neilands, J.B. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 160, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Saitô, H.; Tabeta, R.; Yokoi, M. High-resolution 13C NMR study of free and metal-complexed ionophores in the solid state: Conformation and dynamics of the macrocyclic ring and the effect of intermolecular short contact of methyl groups on spin-lattice relaxation times and displacements of chemical shifts. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1988, 26, 775–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Grimme, S.; Bannwarth, C.; Dohm, S.; Hansen, A.; Pisarek, J.; Pracht, P.; Seibert, J.; Neese, F. Fully automated quantum-chemistry-based computation of spin–spin-coupled nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 14763–14769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Corbaz, R.; Ettlinger, L.; Gäumann, E.; Keller-Schierlein, W.; Kradolfer, F.; Neipp, L.; Prelog, V.; Zähner, H. Stoffwechselprodukte von Actinomyceten. 3. Mitteilung. Nonactin. Helv. Chim. Acta 1955, 38, 1445–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bérdy, J. Handbook of Antibiotic Compounds; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1980; p. 327. ISBN 0849334500. [Google Scholar]
  53. Islam, M.T.; Laatsch, H.; von Tiedemann, A. Inhibitory effects of macrotetrolides from Streptomyces spp. on zoosporogenesis and motility of peronosporomycete zoospores are likely linked with enhanced ATPase activity in mitochondria. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Guzei, I.A.; Wang, C.; Zhan, Y.; Dolomanov, O.V.; Cheng, Y.Q. Pseudomerohedrally twinned monoclinic structure of unfolded ‘free’ nonactin: Comparative analysis of its large conformational change upon encapsulation of alkali metal ions. Acta Crystallogr. C Struct. Chem. 2009, 65 Pt 10, o521–o524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT–Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. A Found Adv. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. C Struct. Chem. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. El-Tarabily, K.A. Promotion of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plant growth by rhizosphere competent 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase–producing Streptomycete actinomycetes. Plant Soil 2008, 308, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Glick, B.R.; Karaturovic, D.M.; Newell, P.C. A novel procedure for rapid isolation of plant growth promoting pseudomonas. Can. J. Microbiol. 1995, 41, 533–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Belimov, A.A.; Safronova, V.I.; Sergeyeva, T.A.; Egorova, T.N.; Matveyeva, V.A.; Tsyganov, V.E.; Borisov, A.Y.; Tikhonovich, I.A.; Kluge, C.; Preisfeld, A.; et al. Characterisation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from polluted soils and containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase. Can. J. Microbiol. 2001, 47, 642–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Bignell, D.R.D.; Fyans, J.K.; Cheng, Z. Phytotoxins produced by plant pathogenic Streptomyces species. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 116, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Appearance of the colonies (A) and mycelium (B) of the strain Streptomyces sp. P-56.
Figure 1. Appearance of the colonies (A) and mycelium (B) of the strain Streptomyces sp. P-56.
Microorganisms 11 00764 g001
Figure 2. Toxicity of the dried ethanol extract (DEE) of Streptomyces sp. P-56 and imidacloprid against peach aphid in greenhouse experiment with bell pepper cultivar Lastochka in vivo. Vertical bars show standard error. Different letters show significant differences between treatments (least significant difference test, p < 0.05, n = 4).
Figure 2. Toxicity of the dried ethanol extract (DEE) of Streptomyces sp. P-56 and imidacloprid against peach aphid in greenhouse experiment with bell pepper cultivar Lastochka in vivo. Vertical bars show standard error. Different letters show significant differences between treatments (least significant difference test, p < 0.05, n = 4).
Microorganisms 11 00764 g002
Figure 3. Spectra NMR 1H of compound 1, CDCl3, 700 MHz (A) and NMR 13C of compound 1, CDCl3, 175.8 MHz (B).
Figure 3. Spectra NMR 1H of compound 1, CDCl3, 700 MHz (A) and NMR 13C of compound 1, CDCl3, 175.8 MHz (B).
Microorganisms 11 00764 g003
Figure 4. Structure of nonactin obtained as a result of X-ray diffraction analysis (A) with view perpendicular to the crystal plane (010). The asymmetric part of the unit cell contains two unbound halves of the molecule. Thermal ellipsoids correspond to 50% probability level. Oxygen atoms are marked with O. Structure formula of nonactin (B).
Figure 4. Structure of nonactin obtained as a result of X-ray diffraction analysis (A) with view perpendicular to the crystal plane (010). The asymmetric part of the unit cell contains two unbound halves of the molecule. Thermal ellipsoids correspond to 50% probability level. Oxygen atoms are marked with O. Structure formula of nonactin (B).
Microorganisms 11 00764 g004
Figure 5. Toxicity of nonactin against vetch aphid in greenhouse experiment with bell pepper in vivo. Vertical bars show confidence intervals (p = 0.05, n = 4).
Figure 5. Toxicity of nonactin against vetch aphid in greenhouse experiment with bell pepper in vivo. Vertical bars show confidence intervals (p = 0.05, n = 4).
Microorganisms 11 00764 g005
Figure 6. Effect of leaf cells of Streptomyces sp. P-56 on root (A) and shoot (B) length of barley and watercress seedlings. Vertical bars show standard error. Different letters show significant differences between treatments (least significant difference test (p < 0.05, n = 70).
Figure 6. Effect of leaf cells of Streptomyces sp. P-56 on root (A) and shoot (B) length of barley and watercress seedlings. Vertical bars show standard error. Different letters show significant differences between treatments (least significant difference test (p < 0.05, n = 70).
Microorganisms 11 00764 g006
Table 1. Antagonistic activity of Streptomyces sp. P-56 against bacteria and fungi.
Table 1. Antagonistic activity of Streptomyces sp. P-56 against bacteria and fungi.
MicroorganismStrain NameDiameter of the Growth Inhibition Zone, mm
Bacteria
Bacillus subtilisVIZR-B1013 ± 1 ab
Clavibacfer michiganense subsp. michiganenseVIZR-13a35 ± 3 d
Erwinia caratovora subsp. caratovoraVIZR: 16022 ± 3 c
Escherichia coliT-0470
Pseudomonas fluoresceusVKM-B-8940
Staphylococcus aureus209p12 ± 1 ab
Streptomyces globisporusVKM-Ac-17910 ± 1 a
Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoriaVIZR-3220
Fungi
Alternaria solaniVIZR-3224 ± 3 c
Ascochyta melonisVIZR-2-210
Aspergillus nigerATCC164040
Fusarium graminearumCOP12 ± 1 ab
Fusarium redolensVIZR-1115 ± 1 b
Fusarium sambucinumVIZR-1812 ± 1 ab
Fusarium solaniVIZR-3820 ± 3 c
Penicillium granulatumATCC-104500
Rhizoctonia solaniVIZR-2815 ± 2 b
Saccharomyces cerevisiaeK-120
Sclerotinia libertianaVIZR-32-125 ± 3 c
Trichoderma gypseumVIZR-G-2410 ± 2 a
Data are mean ± standard error. Different letters show significant differences between treatments (least significant difference test, p < 0.05, n = 3).
Table 2. Toxicity of the dried ethanol extract (DEE) of Streptomyces sp. P-56 against different aphid species in laboratory experiments in vitro.
Table 2. Toxicity of the dried ethanol extract (DEE) of Streptomyces sp. P-56 against different aphid species in laboratory experiments in vitro.
Aphid SpeciesLethal Concentrations, mg mL−1
LC50LC90LC98
Medoura viciae1.14.26.0
Aphis gossypii0.63.24.7
Myzus persicae0.33.55.4
Acyrthosiphon pisum1.86.910.0
Neomyzus. circumtlexus2.65.06.5
Table 3. Chromatographic mode and procedure for selection of the fractions having insecticidal activity against Medoura viciae Buckt.
Table 3. Chromatographic mode and procedure for selection of the fractions having insecticidal activity against Medoura viciae Buckt.
Fraction Collection TimeStarting Solvents Ratio, Vol %Final Solvents Ratio, Vol %Fraction NumberFraction Volume, mLAphid Mortality, %
0 min–2 min 55 sA 100A 10014537
2 min 55 s–3 minA 100A–B 90:10
3 min–5 min 55 sA–B 90:10A–B 90:1024542
5 min 55 s–6 minA–B 90:10A–B 80:20
6 min–8 min 55 sA–B 80:20A–B 80:2034540
8 min 55 s–9 minA–B 80:20A–B 70:30
9 min–11 min 55 sA–B 70:30A–B 70:3044593
11 min 55 s–12 minA–B 70:30A–B 60:40
12 min–14 min 55 sA–B 60:40A–B 60:40545100
14 min 55 s–15 minA–B 60:40A–B 50:50
15 min–17 min 55 sA–B 50:50A–B 50:5064592
17 min 55 s–18 minA–B 50:50A–B 40:60
18 min–20 min 55 sA–B 40:60A–B 40:6074587
20 min 55 s–21 minA–B 40:60A–B 30:70
21 min–23 min 55 sA–B 30:70A–B 30:7084557
23 min 55 s–24 minA–B 30:70A–B 20:80
24 min–26 min 55 sA–B 20:80A–B 20:8094542
26 min 55 s–27 minA–B 20:80A–B 10:90
27 min–29 min 55 sA–B 10:90A–B 10:90104540
29 min 55 s–30 minA–B 10:90B 100
30 min–32 min 55 sB 100B 100114532
32 min 55 s–33 minB 100B 100
33 min–36 minC 100C 100124534
36 min–39 minC 100C 10013450
The solvents were (A) n-hexane, (B) EtOAc and (C) MeOH.
Table 4. X-ray data acquisition and processing results.
Table 4. X-ray data acquisition and processing results.
FormulaC40H64O12
Molar mass736.91
DiffractometerKappa Apex II (Bruker AXS)
Temperature (K)100.0
Radiation sourceCuKα (λ = 1.54178 Å)
Space groupP2/n
Cell parameters: a, b, c (E)28.5271(9), 5.6924(2), 28.5193(9)
б, в, г (°)90, 113.044(2), 90
Volume (E3)4261.6(2)
Z4
The range of angles 2I (°)3.366–105.908
Resolution (E)26.2508–0.9658
Index range−29 ≤ h ≤ 29, −5 ≤ k ≤ 5, −29 ≤ l ≤ 28
Total reflexes68422
Independent reflexes4887
Completeness (%)98.97
Average I/y(I)52.64
Rint0.0449
Rsigma0.0190
Data/parameters4887/478
R [I > =2y (I)]R1 = 0.1067, wR2 = 0.2448
Table 5. Acaricidal activity of the dried ethanol extract (DEE) of Streptomyces sp. P-56 against two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) on the infected common bean leaves.
Table 5. Acaricidal activity of the dried ethanol extract (DEE) of Streptomyces sp. P-56 against two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) on the infected common bean leaves.
TreatmentsTetranychus urticae Mortality, %
Tap waterNd
1.25 g DEE L−156 ± 8 a
2.5 g DEE L−189 ± 5 b
5.0 g DEE L−198 ± 4 b
10.0 g DEE L−1100 ± 3 b
20.0 g DEE L−195 ± 5 b
Fitoverm (2.0 g Aversectin-C L−1)95 ± 5 b
Data are mean ± standard error. Nd means that no dead mites were found. Different letters show significant differences between treatments (least significant difference test, p < 0.05, n = 6).
Table 6. Effect of culture supernatant and dry ethanol extract (DEE) of Streptomyces sp. P-56 on seed germination and root length of barley and watercress seedlings.
Table 6. Effect of culture supernatant and dry ethanol extract (DEE) of Streptomyces sp. P-56 on seed germination and root length of barley and watercress seedlings.
TreatmentsSeed Germination, %Root Length, mm
BarleyWatercressBarleyWatercress
Control58 ± 5 a94 ± 2 b108 ± 5 b33 ± 2 a
Supernatant73 ± 6 a85 ± 5 b89 ± 4 a31 ± 3 a
2 g L−1 DEE45 ± 6 a85 ± 3 b105 ± 5 b37 ± 2 a
Data are mean ± standard error. Different letters show significant differences between treatments (least significant difference test, p < 0.05, n = 4 for seed germination; n > 35 for root length). DEE stands for dry ethanol extract of Streptomyces sp. P-56.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boykova, I.; Yuzikhin, O.; Novikova, I.; Ulianich, P.; Eliseev, I.; Shaposhnikov, A.; Yakimov, A.; Belimov, A. Strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 Produces Nonactin and Possesses Insecticidal, Acaricidal, Antimicrobial and Plant Growth-Promoting Traits. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030764

AMA Style

Boykova I, Yuzikhin O, Novikova I, Ulianich P, Eliseev I, Shaposhnikov A, Yakimov A, Belimov A. Strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 Produces Nonactin and Possesses Insecticidal, Acaricidal, Antimicrobial and Plant Growth-Promoting Traits. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(3):764. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030764

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boykova, Irina, Oleg Yuzikhin, Irina Novikova, Pavel Ulianich, Igor Eliseev, Alexander Shaposhnikov, Alexander Yakimov, and Andrey Belimov. 2023. "Strain Streptomyces sp. P-56 Produces Nonactin and Possesses Insecticidal, Acaricidal, Antimicrobial and Plant Growth-Promoting Traits" Microorganisms 11, no. 3: 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030764

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop