Next Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization of Ciborinia camelliae Kohn Shows Intraspecific Variability and Suggests Transcontinental Movement of the Pathogen
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic Island-Encoded Diguanylate Cyclase from Vibrio alginolyticus Regulates Biofilm Formation and Motility in Pseudoalteromonas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/microorganisms11112726
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pan-Genome Analyses of the Genus Cohnella and Proposal of the Novel Species Cohnella silvisoli sp. nov., Isolated from Forest Soil

by
Chunling Wang
1,
Lutian Mao
1,
Gegen Bao
2 and
Honghui Zhu
3,*
1
College of Life Science, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China
2
Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Crop Germplasm Resources, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China
3
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics and Precision Application (MARA), Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture Collection and Application, Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiome (MARA), State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(11), 2726; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112726
Submission received: 28 August 2023 / Revised: 25 October 2023 / Accepted: 26 October 2023 / Published: 8 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Two strains, designated NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1, were isolated from a soil sample collected from the Nanling National Forests, Guangdong Province, PR China. The two strains were Gram-stain-positive, aerobic, rod-shaped and had lophotrichous flagellation. Strain NL03-T5T could secrete extracellular mucus whereas NL03-T5-1 could not. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that the two strains belong to the genus Cohnella, were most closely related to Cohnella lupini LMG 27416T (95.9% and 96.1% similarities), and both showed 94.0% similarity with Cohnella arctica NRRL B-59459T, respectively. The two strains showed 99.8% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between them. The draft genome size of strain NL03-T5T was 7.44 Mbp with a DNA G+C content of 49.2 mol%. The average nucleotide identities (ANI) and the digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 were 99.98% and 100%, indicating the two strains were of the same species. Additionally, the ANI and dDDH values between NL03-T5T and C. lupini LMG 27416T were 76.1% and 20.4%, respectively. The major cellular fatty acids of strain NL03-T5T included anteiso-C15:0 and iso-C16:0. The major polar lipids and predominant respiratory quinone were diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG) and menaquinone-7 (MK-7). Based on phylogenetic analysis, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characterization, genomic DNA G+C content, and ANI and dDDH values, strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 represent novel species in the genus Cohnella, for which the name Cohnella silvisoli is proposed. The type strain is NL03-T5T (=GDMCC 1.2294T = JCM 34999T). Furthermore, comparative genomics revealed that the genus Cohnella had an open pan-genome. The pan-genome of 29 Cohnella strains contained 41,356 gene families, and the number of strain-specific genes ranged from 6 to 1649. The results may explain the good adaptability of the Cohnella strains to different habitats at the genetic level.

1. Introduction

The genus Cohnella, which lies within the family Paenibacillaceae of the order Bacillales, was first proposed by Kämpfer et al. with the description of Cohnella thermotolerans as the type species [1]. The genus Cohnella currently comprised 45 species with valid names listed in the LPSN database (https://www.bacterio.net/-allnamesac.html, accessed on 1 August 2023). Cells were characterized as Gram-stain-positive, spore-forming or non-spore-forming, aerobic or facultatively anaerobic, rods, and motile or non-motile. The major respiratory quinone is menaquinone-7 (MK-7), the predominant polar lipids contain diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and the main fatty acid profiles include iso-C16:0, anteiso-C15:0 and C16:0 [2]. Species of the genus Cohnella are widely distributed in various environments such as soil [3,4], rhizosphere or root nodules [5], water [6], green algae [7], animal faeces [8], Siberian permafrost [9] and preserved vegetables [10]. The Cohnella species are thought to play an important role in recycling plant biomass within soil, with multiple members of the genus possessing genes for degradation of chitinase, xylan, hemicellulose and cellulose [11,12,13]. During an investigation on the diversity and novelty study of bacterium in soils of the Nanling National Forests, Guangdong Province, PR China, two strains, designated NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1, were isolated and described as a novel species of the genus Cohnella using polyphasic taxonomic studies including phylogenetic analysis, physiological and biochemical characterization, and genomic analysis. Furthermore, comparative genomics of the Cohnella strains were used to define the pan-genome, core genome, and unique genes and to assess genetic diversity to understand their adaptability to different habitats.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain Isolation and Cultivation

Strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 were isolated from a soil sample (24°56′16″ N; 113°00′09″ E) collected on 6 October 2020 from the Nanling National Forests, Guangdong Province, China. The two strains were obtained using a standard dilution and plating method. More specifically, a 1 g air-dried soil sample was added to 9 mL of sterile physiological saline. The mixtures were placed in shaker at 160 rpm for 2 h at 30 °C. Then, 10× series (10−2, 10−3, 10−4 and 10−5) dilutions were performed separately and spread onto Reasoner’s 2A (R2A; Haibo, Qingdao, China) medium. After cultivation at 30 °C for a week, colonies were picked out and a pure aerobic culture was obtained by repeated subculture of cells from the edge of the colony. Upon purification, strains were stored at −80 °C as a suspension containing 25% glycerol.

2.2. 16S rRNA Gene Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis

Genomic DNAs of strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 were extracted from fresh cells grown on R2A agar using a HiPure Bacterial DNA kit (Magen Biotech Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The 16S rRNA genes of NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 were amplified using the extracted genomic DNAs as a template with the universal primers 27F and 1492R [14]. PCR products were sequenced in Majorbio, China. The 16S rRNA genes were aligned in the EzBioCloud (https://eztaxon-e.ezbiocloud.net/) and GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) databases accessed on 1 August 2023. The 16S rRNA gene sequences were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome, accessed on 1 August 2023) under the accession numbers MZ955418 and OQ913505. Phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA genes were reconstructed using methods including maximum-likelihood (ML) [15], neighbor-joining (NJ) [16] and minimum-evolution (ME) [17] using MEGA 7.0 software [18]. The topology in each phylogenetic tree was calculated based on 1000 replications and evolutionary distances were calculated using Kimura’s two-parameter model [19]. Based on the phylogenetic analysis, the type strains Cohnella abietis HS21T, Cohnella lupini LMG 27416T, and Cohnella arctica NRRL B-59459T obtained from the Belgian Co-ordinated Collections of Micro-organisms and the Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection were used as experiment control strains and cultured under optimum conditions.

2.3. Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Characteristics

The morphological features of strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 were observed by light microscope (DM6/MC190, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and transmission electron microscope (H7650, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with cell growth on R2A agar for 4 d at 30 °C. The growth test was performed on nutrient agar (NA), trypticase soy agar (TSA), MacConkey (Mac) and MD1 agar (6 g of casein peptone, 2 g of soluble starch, 2 g of MgSO4·7H2O, 0.4 g of CaCl2·2H2O, 1 L of distilled water, pH 7.2). Growth at different temperatures (10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 37, 40 °C) was tested on R2A agar for 3–4 d. Sodium chloride tolerance was tested at 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5%, and pH tolerance was performed from 5.0 to 9.5 at intervals of 0.5 pH units according to the method described in [20] on R2A medium for 3–4 d. The Gram-staining reaction was performed by using a bioMérieux Gram stain kit (bioMérieux, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Oxidase activity was tested using oxidase test strips [1% (w/v) tetramethyl-p-phe-nylenediamine, HKM], and catalase activity was determined by bubble production after mixing cells with 3% H2O2. Gliding motility was checked by observing the edges of colonies formed on 1:6-diluted R2A and using the hanging drop technique as described by Bernardet et al. (2002) [21]. Hydrolyses of casein (1%, w/v), CM-cellulose (1%, w/v), Tween 20 (1%, w/v) and 40 (1%, w/v) were examined as described by Son et al. [22]. Other physiological properties were examined using API 20NE and API ZYM kits (bioMérieux) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.4. Chemotaxonomic Properties

For cellular fatty acids, polar lipids, and respiratory quinones analysis, strain NL03-T5T and its related species were harvested from R2A agar after being incubated for 4 d at 30 ℃. Fatty acid methyl esters were extracted using the Sherlock Microbial Identification System (MIDI) protocol version 6.1 and analyzed by gas chromatography (model 7890A, Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) as previously described [23]. The polar lipids were extracted and determined according to the protocol of Tindall et al. [24]. Respiratory quinones were extracted and purified using the method of Minnikin et al. [25] and analyzed using HPLC (UltiMate 3000, 205 Dionex, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.5. Genome Sequencing, Annotation, and Pan-Genomic Analysis

The genomic DNAs of strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq platform at Shanghai Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Sequencing reads were assembled into contigs and scaffolds by applying SPAdes version 3.11.1 with default parameters [26], and the sequences were submitted to the NCBI database under the accession numbers JAIOAP000000000 and JASKHM000000000. Genomic annotation was performed using the software Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) pipeline (http://rast.nmpdr.org/, accessed on 1 August 2023) with default parameters. The genes encoding carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes) were identified using the dbCAN2 meta server (http://cys.bios.niu.edu/dbCAN2, accessed on 1 August 2023) with HMMER annotation (E-Value < 1 × 10−15, coverage > 0.35), and biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) were annotated using antiSMASH bacterial version 6.1.1 (https://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org, accessed on 1 August 2023) with default parameters, respectively. All 27 reference genomes of the genus Cohnella were downloaded from the NCBI database. A pan-genome analysis was performed using the bacterial pan-genome analyses tool (BPGA) pipeline [27] with default parameters. Orthologous genes were identified with the USEARCH algorithm using a threshold of 0.5. Core, accessory, and unique genes were functionally annotated using the eggNOG mapper v2 [28]. The data of the pan-genomes were visualized using the ImageGP online database (https://www.bic.ac.cn/ImageGP/, accessed on 1 August 2023).

2.6. OGRI Calculation and Phylogenomic Analysis

Overall genome relatedness indices (OGRI) including the digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) and average nucleotide identity (ANI) values were calculated using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) (https://ggdc.dsmz.de/, accessed on 1 August 2023) [29] and OrthANIu (www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ani, accessed on 1 August 2023) [30], respectively. The whole-genome phylogenetic analysis of the genus Cohnella was reconstructed based on 92 up-to-date core genes using the software UBCG version 3.0 [31] with a maximum-likelihood algorithm.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analysis Based on 16S rRNA Genes and Genomic Sequences

Strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 showed 99.8% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. In the EzBiocloud and NCBI databases, the two strains were closely related to the species of the genus Cohnella and showed the highest similarities with C. lupini LMG 27416T (95.9% and 96.1%), and they both exhibited 95.3% and 94.0% similarities with C. abietis HS21T and C. arctica NRRL B-59459T, respectively. The 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic trees based on the ML, NJ, and ME methods (Figure 1a and Figures S1 and S2) all showed that strain NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 formed an independent cluster with C. lupini LMG 27416T and C. arctica NRRL B-59459T. Furthermore, the phylogenomic tree indicated that strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 formed an independent cluster with Cohnella abietis HS21T (Figure 1b). Therefore, we further selected C. lupini LMG 27416T, C. abietis HS21T, and C. arctica NRRL B-59459T as reference type strains for taxonomic studies.

3.2. Physiological Characterization

The cells of strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 were Gram-stain-positive, aerobic, lophotrichous flagellation, rod-shaped, and 1.2–2.0 μm long and 0.4–0.6 μm in diameter after incubation on R2A agar for 4 d at 30 °C (Figure 2c–f). Colonies were white-cream colored and strain NL03-T5T could secrete extracellular mucus whereas NL03-T5-1 could not (Figure 2a,b). The two strains could grow on R2A, but not on NA, TSA, Mac and MD1 agar. Physiological analyses indicated that strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 were able to grow at 10–37 °C, pH 5.0–8.5 and cells could tolerate 0.5% (w/v) NaCl (Table 1). Strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 were negative for oxidase activity whereas their closely related species C. abietis HS21T, C. lupini LMG 27416T, and C. arctica NRRL B-59459T were positive. In addition, strain NL03-T5T was positive for hydrolysis of Tween 20 and utilization of a-mannosidase whereas its related species C. lupini LMG 27416T and C. arctica NRRL B-59459T were negative. Additional differences between strain NL03-T5T and its closely related species are shown in Table 1.

3.3. Chemotaxonomic Analysis

The cellular fatty acid compositions of strain NL03-T5T and its reference species C. abietis HS21T, C. lupini LMG 27416T, and C. arctica NRRL B-59459T are given in Table 2. The whole-cell fatty acids of strain NL03-T5T contained a large amount of anteiso-C15:0 (50.7%) and iso-C16:0 (21.2%), and small amounts of C16:0 (7.2%), iso-C15:0 (5.5%), anteiso-C17:0 (4.0%), iso-C14:0 (3.7%), iso-C14:0 (1.9%), anteiso-C13:0 (1.6%) and C14:0 (1.3%). The prominent fatty acids were similar to other species of the genus Cohnella, indicating that strain NL03-T5T is a member of the genus Cohnella. However, strain NL03-T5T contained a higher amount of iso-C16:0 than its closely related species C. abietis HS21T, and it contained a lower amount of C16:0 and a higher amount of iso-C15:0 and iso-C16:0 than C. lupini LMG 27416T and C. arctica NRRL B-59459T. Moreover, strain NL03-T5T did not contain alcohol-C16:1 ω7c (6.5%) or C16:1 ω11c (7.0%) whereas C. lupini LMG 27416T did. These significant differences in the fatty acids clearly distinguished strain NL03-T5T from other related species. The major polar lipids of strain NL03-T5T were DPG and PE, which were in common with its closely related species. Otherwise, four unidentified amino phospholipids (APLs) were also detected in strain NL03-T5T (Figure S3). The predominant menaquinone of strain NL03-T5T was MK-7, which was found in all members of the genus Cohnella [2].

3.4. Genomic Characteristics and OGRI Values

The draft genome size of strain NL03-T5T was 7.44 Mbp with 43 contigs and an N50 value of 310,309 bp. In addition, the draft genome size of strain NL03-T5-1 was 7.44 Mbp with 41 contigs and an N50 value of 310,325. The two genomics DNA G+C contents were both 49.2 mol%, which were lower than the G+C contents of C. lupini LMG 27416T and C. arctica NRRL B-59459T (50.7 and 50.3 mol%), and higher than C. abietis HS21T (44.8%) (Table 1). The distribution of genes into functional categories of strain NL03-T5T using RAST revealed that the highest percentages of genes were assigned to carbohydrates (18.5%), amino acids and derivatives (17.3%), protein metabolism (9.3%) and cofactors, vitamins, prosthetic groups, and pigments (8.9%) (Table S1). In addition, strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 showed 20 gene differences in the functional category of amino acids and derivatives, which probably cause phenotypic differences between the two strains (Table S1). The antiSMASH tool identified four complete BGCs and four BGCs on the contig edge that might be fragments of BGCs. The four complete BGCs include a resorcinol, a terpene, a RiPP-like and a phosphonate. The dbCAN2 analysis of the NL03-T5T genome predicted 513 CAZymes which were distributed across 114 different CAZymes families, with glycoside hydrolases (GHs) and carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) constituting the most abundant families (Figure S4). Additionally, the ANI and dDDH values of strain NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 were 99.98% and 100%, indicating the two strains were of the same species. The ANI values among NL03-T5T and its closely related species C. abietis HS21T and C. lupini LMG 27416T were 75.7% and 76.0%, respectively. The dDDH values among them both were 20.4%. These values were lower than the threshold values of 95–96% and 70% for species discrimination [33], indicating that strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 represent a novel species.

3.5. Pan-Genome Analysis of the Genus Cohnella

The pan-genome of the 29 Cohnella strains comprised 41,356 gene families. The core genes were present in all 29 genomes, accessory genes were present in 2–28 genomes, and unique genes were present only in one genome. The numbers of core genes, accessory genes, and unique genes were 492 (1.2%), 19,166 (46.3%), and 21,698 (52.5%), respectively (Figure 3a). The numbers of strain-specific genes ranged from 6 to 1649 (Figure 3b), suggesting there is an obvious difference among the genomes of the 29 Cohnella strains. The size of the pan-genome increased with the increasing number of genomes. Correspondingly, the core-genome size decreased with the addition of genomes (Figure 3c). The curves of pan-genome and core-genome sizes indicated an open pan-genome of the genus Cohnella, which was supported by the parameter b value (0.567477, between zero and one) in the power-law regression function. New gene distribution and gene family distribution of the 29 Cohnella strains are shown in Figure 3d and Figure 3e, respectively. Functional characterization from core, accessory, and unique genes was conducted using the COGs annotation. As shown in Figure 3f, many core, accessory, and unique genes were assigned to the category “S”, indicating their functions await to be studied further. Except for poorly characterized categories, the largest proportion of core genes belonged to the categories “translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (J)”, followed by “amino acid transport and metabolism (E)”. In contrast, the highest percentage of accessory genes and unique genes was related to carbohydrate transport and metabolism (G), followed by transcription (K). The results above may explain the good adaptability of the Cohnella strains to different habitats through gene gains or losses during frequent evolutionary changes at the genetic level.

4. Discussion

In this study, we isolated two bacterial strains, designated NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1, from a soil sample collected from the Nanling National Forests, PR China. The two strains showed 99.8% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. The ANI and dDDH values between them are 99.98% and 100%. These results indicate the two strains are of the same species. However, strain NL03-T5T could secrete extracellular mucus whereas NL03-T5-1 could not (Figure 2a,b). Furthermore, the distribution of genes into functional categories using RAST revealed 20 gene differences in the functional category of amino acids and derivatives between them (Table S1). These different genes probably cause phenotypic differences. Based on phylogenetic analysis, genomic DNA G+C content, ANI and dDDH values, physiological characterization and chemotaxonomic analysis, strain NL03-T5T was identified as a novel species in the genus Cohnella, for which the name Cohnella silvisoli sp. nov. is proposed.
The genus Cohnella strains are widely distributed in different environments. This to a certain extent can be explained by the nature of Cohnella which allows it to acclimatize itself to many environments. Comparative genomics indicated that the genus Cohnella had an open pan-genome and exhibited broad genetic diversity. In general, an open pan-genome is predominant in bacteria that are susceptible to horizontal gene transfer (HGT) [34]. The pan-genome of 29 Cohnella strains contained 41,356 gene families, and the numbers of core genes, accessory genes, and unique genes were 492, 19,166, and 21,698, respectively (Figure 3a,c). Tettelin et al. (2008) has illustrated that the core genome is essential for the basic lifestyle of bacteria, whereas the accessory genome and unique genes provide some characteristics such species diversity and environmental adaptability [35]. Therefore, we preliminarily inferred that the genomic differences in the Cohnella strains might be associated with their colonized environments.

5. Description of Cohnella silvisoli sp. nov.

Cohnella silvisoli (sil.vi.so′li. L. fem. n. silva forest; L. neut. n. solum soil; N.L. gen. n. silvisoli of forest soil, the source of isolation of the type strain).
Cells are aerobic, Gram-stain-positive, lophotrichous flagellation, rod-shaped, 1.2–2.0 μm long and 0.4–0.6 μm in diameter after incubation on R2A agar for 4 d. Colonies on R2A agar are white-cream, circular, convex with extracellular secretions or not. Growth occurs at 15–37 ℃ and at a pH range from 5.0 to 8.5 (optimum, pH 7.0). Cells can tolerate 0.5% (w/v) NaCl. Oxidase and catalase are -negative. It can hydrolyze Tween 20, but not Tween 40, casein, or CM-cellulose. Additionally, it can hydrolyze gelatin or not. The major fatty acids (>10%) include anteiso-C15:0 (50.7%) and iso-C16:0 (21.2%). The predominant polar lipid is DPG. The main respiratory quinone is MK-7. The API ZYM test result was positive for alkaline phosphatase, esterase, lipase, leucine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase and α-mannosidase; but negative for valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin and α-fucosidase. The API 20NE test results were positive for gelatin hydrolysis, 4-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranosidase and β-glucosidase or not; but negative for nitrate reduction, indole production, glucose fermentation, arginine dihydrolase and urease. It can assimilate glucose, L-arabinose, mannose, mannitol, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, maltose, gluconate, adipate, malic acid, citric acid, phenylacetic acid and capric acid or not.
The type strain is NL03-T5T (=GDMCC 1.2294T = JCM 34999T), which was isolated from a soil sample collected from the Nanling National Forests, Guangdong Province, PR China. The genomic DNA G+C content of the type strain is 49.2 mol%.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11112726/s1, Figure S1: The neighbor-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences constructed revealing the phylogenetic position of strain NL03-T5T, NL03-T5-1 and its closely related species of the genus Cohnella. Only the bootstrap values (represented percentages of 1000 replication) ˃50% are shown. GeneBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Bar, 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide position; Figure S2: The minimum evolution tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences constructed indicating the relationship of strain NL03-T5T, NL03-T5-1 and its closely related species of the genus Cohnella. Bootstrap values (represented percentages of 1000 replication) ˃50% are shown at nodes. GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Bar, 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide position; Figure S3: Two-dimensional thin-layer chromatograms of the polar lipids of strain NL03-T5T and its closely related species, C. lupini LMG 27416T and C. arctica NRRL B-59459T, by spraying with 5% ethanolic molybdatophosphoric acid and heating them at 140 °C for 15 min. Abbreviations: DPG, diphosphatidylglycerol; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; APL, unidentified aminophospholipid; Figure S4: Total CAZymes in the various families, predicted in NL03-T5T genome; Table S1: Genome characteristics of Cohnella silvisoli NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1.

Author Contributions

C.W. performed isolation, deposition, polyphasic taxonomy and drafted the manuscript. G.B. performed taxonomic identifications. L.M. revised the manuscript. H.Z. designed research and project outline, and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was jointly supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (32001115), the Initial Funding for Doctoral Research of Huizhou University (2022JB087), the grant from the Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2022A1515111059) and the grant from the Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (2023A04J1432).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This article does not contain any studies involving human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abbreviations

GDMCCGuangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center
JCMJapan Collection of Microorganism
LMGBelgian Co-ordinated Collections of Micro-organisms
NRRLAgricultural Research Service Culture Collection
ANIAverage Nucleotide Identity
dDDHthe Digital DNA-DNA Hybridization
UBCGUp-to-date Bacterial Core Gene set
DPGdiphosphatidylglycerol
PEphosphatidylethanolamine
PGphosphatidylglycerol
APLunidentified aminophospholipid

References

  1. Kämpfer, P.; Rosselló-Mora, R.; Falsen, E.; Busse, H.-J.; Tindall, B.J. Cohnella thermotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., and classification of ‘Paenibacillus hongkongensis’ as Cohnella hongkongensis sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 781–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Garcia-Fraile, P.; Velazquez, E.; Mateos, P.F.; Martinez-Molina, E.; Rivas, R. Cohnella phaseoli sp. nov., isolated from root nodules of Phaseolus coccineus in Spain, and emended description of the genus Cohnella. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 1855–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jiang, F.; Dai, J.; Wang, Y.; Xue, X.; Xu, M.; Li, W.; Fang, C.; Peng, F. Cohnella arctica sp. nov., isolated from Arctic tundra soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 817–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cai, F.; Wang, Y.; Qi, H.; Dai, J.; Yu, B.; An, H.; Rahman, E.; Fang, C. Cohnella luojiensis sp. nov., isolated from soil of a Euphrates poplar forest. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 1605–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Flores-Félix, J.D.; Carro, L.; Ramírez-Bahena, M.-H.; Tejedor, C.; Igual, J.M.; Peix, A.; Velázquez, E. Cohnella lupini sp. nov., an endophytic bacterium isolated from root nodules of Lupinus albus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 83–87. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shiratori, H.; Tagami, Y.; Beppu, T.; Ueda, K. Cohnella fontinalis sp. nov., a xylanolytic bacterium isolated from fresh water. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 1344–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lee, Y.; Jeon, C.O. Cohnella algarum sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater green alga Paulinella chromatophora. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 4767–4772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhu, H.Z.; Liu, X.D.; Jiang, C.Y.; Liu, S.J. Cohnella faecalis sp. nov., isolated from animal faeces in a karst cave. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kudryashova, E.B.; Karlyshev, A.V.; Ariskina, E.V.; Streshinskaya, G.M.; Vinokurova, N.G.; Kopitsyn, D.S.; Evtushenko, L.I. Cohnella kolymensis sp. nov., a novel bacillus isolated from Siberian permafrost. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 2912–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lin, S.Y.; Chen, W.M.; Hameed, A.; Huang, G.H.; Hung, M.H.; Young, C.C. Cohnella fermenti sp. nov., isolated from a fermentation process. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 2602–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aliabadi, N.; Aminzadeh, S.; Karkhane, A.A.; Haghbeen, K. Thermostable chitinase from Cohnella sp. A01: Isolation and product optimization. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cho, E.A.; Lee, D.W.; Cha, Y.H.; Lee, S.J.; Jung, H.C.; Pan, J.G.; Pyun, Y.R. Characterization of a novel D-lyxose isomerase from Cohnella laevoribosii RI-39 sp. nov. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 1655–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khianngam, S.; Tanasupawat, S.; Akaracharanya, A.; Kim, K.K.; Lee, K.C.; Lee, J.S. Cohnella cellulosilytica sp. nov., isolated from buffalo faeces. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 1921–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kai, A.K.L.; Cheung, Y.K.; Yeung, R.K.K.; Wong, J.T.Y. Development of single-cell PCR methods for the Raphidophyceae. Harmful Algae. 2006, 5, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guindon, S.; Gascuel, O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The Neighbour-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Fitch, W.M. Toward defining course of evolution-minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 1971, 20, 406–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparatives studies of nucleotide-sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980, 16, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lv, Y.Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, M.H.; You, J.; Qiu, L.H. Dinghuibacter silviterrae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1785–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bernardet, J.F.; Nakagawa, Y.; Holmes, B. Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 1049–1070. [Google Scholar]
  22. Son, H.M.; Kook, M.; Kim, J.H.; Yi, T.H. Taibaiella koreensis sp. nov., isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 1018–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sasser, M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids; MIDI Inc.: Newark, DE, USA, 1990; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tindall, B.; Sikorski, J.; Smibert, R.; Krieg, N. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology; Reddy, C.A., Beveridge, T.J., Breznak, J.A., Marzluf, G.A., Schmidt, T.M., Snyder, L.R., Eds.; American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; pp. 384–385. [Google Scholar]
  25. Minnikin, D.E.; Odonnell, A.G.; Goodfellow, M.; Alderson, G.; Athalye, M.; Schaal, A.; Parlett, J.H. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprendoid quinones and polar lipids. J. Microbiol. Meth. 1984, 2, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chaudhari, N.M.; Gupta, V.K.; Dutta, C. BPGA—An ultra-fast pan-genome analysis pipeline. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cantalapiedra, C.P.; Hernandez-Plaza, A.; Letunic, I.; Bork, P.; Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5825–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Auch, A.F.; Klenk, H.P.; Göker, M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Lim, J.; Kwon, S.; Chun, J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017, 110, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Na, S.I.; Kim, Y.O.; Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Baek, I.; Chun, J. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J. Microbiol. 2018, 56, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiang, L.; Pheng, S.; Lee, K.C.; Kang, S.W.; Jeong, J.C.; Kim, C.Y.; Park, H.C.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, S.G.; et al. Cohnella abietis sp. nov., isolated from Korean fir (Abies koreana) rhizospheric soil of Halla mountain. J. Microbiol. 2019, 57, 953–958. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chun, J.; Oren, A.; Ventosa, A.; Christensen, H.; Arahal, D.R.; da Costa, M.S.; Rooney, A.P.; Yi, H.; Xu, X.W.; De Meyer, S.; et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hurtado, R.; Carhuaricra, D.; Soares, S.; Viana, M.V.C.; Azevedo, V.; Maturrano, L.; Aburjaile, F. Pan-genomic approach shows insight of genetic divergence and pathogenic-adaptation of Pasteurella multocida. Gene 2018, 670, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tettelin, H.; Riley, D.; Cattuto, C.; Medini, D. Comparative genomics: The bacterial pan-genome. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2008, 11, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 11 02726 g001
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationship among species of the genus Cohnella. (a) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences generated by MEGA 7.0 software. Bootstrap values (represented percentages of 1000 replication) > 50% are shown at nodes. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position. (b) The UBCG phylogenetic tree based on 92 up-to-date bacterial core genes sequences is constructed using the ML algorithm. Bar, 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position. GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationship among species of the genus Cohnella. (a) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences generated by MEGA 7.0 software. Bootstrap values (represented percentages of 1000 replication) > 50% are shown at nodes. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position. (b) The UBCG phylogenetic tree based on 92 up-to-date bacterial core genes sequences is constructed using the ML algorithm. Bar, 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position. GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses.
Microorganisms 11 02726 g001
Microorganisms 11 02726 g002
Figure 2. Morphologies of NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1. (a,b) Photographs of strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 grown on R2A for 4 d at 30 °C. (c,d) Light micrographs of NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1, cells were stained by crystal violet. Scale: 5 μm. (e,f) Transmission electronic micrographs of NL03-T5T. Scale: 500 nm.
Figure 2. Morphologies of NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1. (a,b) Photographs of strains NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1 grown on R2A for 4 d at 30 °C. (c,d) Light micrographs of NL03-T5T and NL03-T5-1, cells were stained by crystal violet. Scale: 5 μm. (e,f) Transmission electronic micrographs of NL03-T5T. Scale: 500 nm.
Microorganisms 11 02726 g002
Microorganisms 11 02726 g003
Figure 3. The pan-genome analysis of the genus Cohnella. (a) The numbers and proportions of core genes, accessory genes, and unique genes. (b) Flower plot painting the core genome and unique-specific strain of the Cohnella strains. (c) Boxplots of the pan-genome (blue) and core genome (red) of the 29 analyzed genomes. (d) Number of new genes represented within the numbers of Cohnella genomes. (e) Number of gene families represented within the numbers of Cohnella genomes. (f) The proportions of COGs functional categories of core genes, accessory genes, and unique genes. J, translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; K, transcription; L, replication, recombination, and repair; D, cell cycle control, cell division, and chromosome partitioning; V, defense mechanisms; T, signal transduction mechanisms; M, cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; N, cell motility; U, intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; O, posttranslational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones; H, coenzyme transport and metabolism; I, lipid transport and metabolism; P, inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Q, secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism; C, energy production and conversion; G, carbohydrate transport and metabolism; E, amino acid transport and metabolism; F, nucleotide transport and metabolism; S, function unknown; -, general function prediction only.
Figure 3. The pan-genome analysis of the genus Cohnella. (a) The numbers and proportions of core genes, accessory genes, and unique genes. (b) Flower plot painting the core genome and unique-specific strain of the Cohnella strains. (c) Boxplots of the pan-genome (blue) and core genome (red) of the 29 analyzed genomes. (d) Number of new genes represented within the numbers of Cohnella genomes. (e) Number of gene families represented within the numbers of Cohnella genomes. (f) The proportions of COGs functional categories of core genes, accessory genes, and unique genes. J, translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; K, transcription; L, replication, recombination, and repair; D, cell cycle control, cell division, and chromosome partitioning; V, defense mechanisms; T, signal transduction mechanisms; M, cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; N, cell motility; U, intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; O, posttranslational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones; H, coenzyme transport and metabolism; I, lipid transport and metabolism; P, inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Q, secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism; C, energy production and conversion; G, carbohydrate transport and metabolism; E, amino acid transport and metabolism; F, nucleotide transport and metabolism; S, function unknown; -, general function prediction only.
Microorganisms 11 02726 g003
Table 1. Differential phenotypic characteristics of strains NL03-T5T, NL03-T5-1 and their closely related species of the genus Cohnella.
Table 1. Differential phenotypic characteristics of strains NL03-T5T, NL03-T5-1 and their closely related species of the genus Cohnella.
CharacteristicsNL03-T5TNL03-T5-1C. abietis HS21T [32]C. lupini LMG 27416TC. arctica NRRL B-59459T
Isolation sourcesoilsoilsoilroot nodules of Lupinus albus soil
Colony colourwhite-creamwhite-creamwhiteorangewhite-cream
Oxidase−−+++
Catalase−−−++
Growth at 37 °Cw+−−−
Temperature range 10–3710–374–3010–3510–35
pH range5.0–8.55.0–8.56–85.5–8.55.0–9.0
Growth on media:
Reasoner’s 2A+++−+
NA−−++−
Hydrolysis of:
Gelatin++−++
Tweens 20++ND−−
Assimilation of:
Mannitol+++−+
N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine+++−+
Gluconate++−−+
Capric acid−+−−+
Enzyme activities:
Esterase (C8)++ND−+
β-Glucosidase+−ND++
α-Mannosidase++ND−−
GC content (mol%)49.249.244.850.750.3
All data are from this study unless indicated otherwise. +, positive; −, negative; w, weakly positive reaction; ND, no data available.
Table 2. Cellular fatty acids of strain NL03-T5T and its closely related species of the genus Cohnella. Strains: 1, NL03-T5T; 2, C. abietis HS21T [32]; 3, C. lupini LMG 27416T; 4, C. arctica NRRL B-59459T. Data of strain 1, 3 and 4 were from this study. All strains were incubated on R2A agar for 4 d at 30 °C. Values are percentages of the total fatty acids. Fatty acids that make up <1.0% of the total are not shown. -, not detected or <1.0%.
Table 2. Cellular fatty acids of strain NL03-T5T and its closely related species of the genus Cohnella. Strains: 1, NL03-T5T; 2, C. abietis HS21T [32]; 3, C. lupini LMG 27416T; 4, C. arctica NRRL B-59459T. Data of strain 1, 3 and 4 were from this study. All strains were incubated on R2A agar for 4 d at 30 °C. Values are percentages of the total fatty acids. Fatty acids that make up <1.0% of the total are not shown. -, not detected or <1.0%.
Fatty Acid1234
anteiso-C13:01.64.3-2.1
iso-C14:03.72.71.12.6
C14:01.31.62.33.3
iso-C15:05.56.02.12.1
anteiso-C15:050.750.942.244.7
C16:07.29.922.014.5
alcohol-C16:1 ω7c--6.5-
C16:1 ω11c--7.0-
iso-C16:021.213.76.918.0
iso-C17:01.92.41.2-
anteiso-C17:04.03.25.24.1
C17:0---2.1
C18:0---1.4
Summed feature 8---1.4
Summed features are fatty acids that cannot be resolved reliably from another fatty acid using the chromatographic conditions chosen. The MIDI system groups these fatty acids together as one feature with a single percentage of the total. Summed feature 8, C18:1 ω7c and/or C18:1 ω6c.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, C.; Mao, L.; Bao, G.; Zhu, H. Pan-Genome Analyses of the Genus Cohnella and Proposal of the Novel Species Cohnella silvisoli sp. nov., Isolated from Forest Soil. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2726. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112726

AMA Style

Wang C, Mao L, Bao G, Zhu H. Pan-Genome Analyses of the Genus Cohnella and Proposal of the Novel Species Cohnella silvisoli sp. nov., Isolated from Forest Soil. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(11):2726. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112726

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Chunling, Lutian Mao, Gegen Bao, and Honghui Zhu. 2023. "Pan-Genome Analyses of the Genus Cohnella and Proposal of the Novel Species Cohnella silvisoli sp. nov., Isolated from Forest Soil" Microorganisms 11, no. 11: 2726. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112726

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop