Next Article in Journal
Gastrointestinal Pathogens in Multi-Infected Individuals: A Cluster Analysis of Interaction
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of Probiotics in Preventing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Colonization in the Intensive Care Unit: Risk Factors and Microbiome Analysis Study
Previous Article in Journal
Possible Mechanisms of Lymphopenia in Severe Tuberculosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Alpha-Naphthoflavone as a Novel Scaffold for the Design of Potential Inhibitors of the APH(3’)-IIIa Nucleotide-Binding Site of Enterococcus faecalis
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Antibiotic Use for Sepsis in Hospitalized Neonates in Botswana: Factors Associated with Guideline-Divergent Prescribing

Microorganisms 2023, 11(11), 2641; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112641
by Jameson Dowling 1,2, Tonya Arscott-Mills 3, One Bayani 4, Mickael Boustany 2, Banno Moorad 5, Melissa Richard-Greenblatt 6,7, Nametso Tlhako 5, Morgan Zalot 2, Andrew P. Steenhoff 2,5,8, Alemayehu M. Gezmu 4, Britt Nakstad 4, Jonathan Strysko 5,8,9, Susan E. Coffin 2,8 and Carolyn McGann 8,10,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Microorganisms 2023, 11(11), 2641; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112641
Submission received: 20 September 2023 / Accepted: 23 October 2023 / Published: 27 October 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this manuscript, Dowling et al., examined antibiotic prescription for neonatal sepsis in a neonatal unit in Botswana. Overall, the study is well performed and the manuscript can be accepted in its present form.

In this study authors, have determined the association between the time of neonatal sepsis onset (early or late) and lower estimated gestational age with divergent antibiotic regimens as per WHO guidelines. The study suggested that treatment guidelines does not align with contemporary antimicrobial resistance. 

The sample size used for the study is low but the authors have already mentioned about this limitation in the manuscript.

Tables and figures are fine as per my understanding.     

Reviewer 2 Report

work that is applicable in many low- and middle-income countries, where antimicrobial access may be erratic and neonatal sepsis pathogens are frequently multidrug-resistant, empiric antibiotic prescribing practices may diverge from World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Unfortunately, this is an established practice in those areas and this paper gives a good account of it. It is written clearly, comprehensively and interestingly for readers.

Reviewer 3 Report

It is not clear to me how the authors explain guideline diverted antibiotic therapy in the early onset sepsis day 1-3.

what means laboratory co firmed sepsis ( cultures, biomarkers other) if only 26 episodes of sepsis were confirmed how the adequacy of treatment was confirmed.

The work is interesting since it enriches the information about infections and mortality in early onset sepsis  in newborns in their  first 3 days of life. It shows as well that in the case of late onset sepsis ( day 4-9)   in low income country  in newborns ( day 4-9) mortality is  16%. Empiric therapy based on microprophile is effective .
Back to TopTop