Next Article in Journal
Combined Action of Antibiotics and Bacteriocins against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
Next Article in Special Issue
Methylprednisolone Promotes Mycobacterium smegmatis Survival in Macrophages through NF-κB/DUSP1 Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Antibiotic Resistance Properties among Pseudomonas spp. Associated with Salmon Processing Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mycobacterium chimaera Identification Using MALDI-TOF MS Technology: A Practical Approach for the Clinical Microbiology Laboratories
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 7
10.3390/microorganisms10071421
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Activity of Drug Combinations against Mycobacterium abscessus Grown in Aerobic and Hypoxic Conditions

by
Alessio Lanni
1,
Emanuele Borroni
2,
Angelo Iacobino
1,
Cristina Russo
3,
Leonarda Gentile
3,
Lanfranco Fattorini
1 and
Federico Giannoni
1,*
1
Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy
2
Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
3
Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(7), 1421; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071421
Submission received: 25 May 2022 / Revised: 8 July 2022 / Accepted: 9 July 2022 / Published: 14 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nontuberculous Mycobacteria: Recent Advancements in Infection, Diagnosis and Therapy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Infections caused by Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab), an environmental non-tuberculous mycobacterium, are difficult to eradicate from patients with pulmonary diseases such as cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis even after years of antibiotic treatments. In these people, the low oxygen pressure in mucus and biofilm may restrict Mab growth from actively replicating aerobic (A) to non-replicating hypoxic (H) stages, which are known to be extremely drug-tolerant. After the exposure of Mab A and H cells to drugs, killing was monitored by measuring colony-forming units (CFU) and regrowth in liquid medium (MGIT 960) of 1-day-old A cells (A1) and 5-day-old H cells (H5). Mab killing was defined as a lack of regrowth of drug-exposed cells in MGIT tubes after >50 days of incubation. Out of 18 drugs tested, 14-day treatments with bedaquiline-amikacin (BDQ-AMK)-containing three-drug combinations were very active against A1 + H5 cells. However, drug-tolerant cells (persisters) were not killed, as shown by CFU curves with typical bimodal trends. Instead, 56-day treatments with the nitrocompounds containing combinations BDQ-AMK-rifabutin-clarithromycin-nimorazole and BDQ-AMK-rifabutin-clarithromycin-metronidazole-colistin killed all A1 + H5 Mab cells in 42 and 56 days, respectively, as shown by lack of regrowth in agar and MGIT medium. Overall, these data indicated that Mab persisters may be killed by appropriate drug combinations.

1. Introduction

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are environmental organisms increasingly recognized as human pathogens [1]. Among the rapidly growing NTM, the Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab) complex includes the subspecies massiliense, bolletii and abscessus [2]. M. abscessus is becoming the most prominent and worrisome NTM pathogen worldwide for its capacity to cause chronic infections in patients with pre-existing pulmonary lesions, including people with cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis [2,3,4].
M. abscessus infections in patients with cystic fibrosis are increasing [5,6]. Cystic fibrosis arises due to mutational dysfunctions of the gene encoding the transmembrane conductance regulator protein [7]. When this protein is not functional, thick airway secretions impair mucociliary lung clearance, which increases bacterial colonization. Organisms inside cystic fibrosis lungs form biofilms within the thickened alveolar walls and airways [1,8]. When biofilms reach a thickness of >40 nm, oxygen depletion occurs [9], and Mab may restrict growth from actively replicating (AR) aerobic to non-replicating (NR), anaerobic, drug-tolerant cells (persisters). An extreme drug tolerance to Mab persisters was reported [10]. As seen for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), NTM may enter an NR state, exhibiting high phenotypic drug resistance inside lung lesions [1]. Once the infection is established, Mab colonial morphology may also change from the smooth to the rough variant, which is associated with increased antibiotic and hydrogen peroxide resistance and with invasive behaviour [6,11].
M. abscessus pulmonary diseases are treated with antibiotic combinations for months or years, but often eradication fails and leads to an accelerated decline in lung functions [2,12]. In the US and Europe, recommendations for the management of NTM in cystic fibrosis [13] with Mab treatment include an initial intensive phase for 3–12 weeks with a macrolide and intravenous amikacin (AMK), with one or more additional drugs, including intravenous tigecycline (TGC), imipenem or cefoxitin, followed by a continuation phase of >1 year of a macrolide and inhaled AMK with two to three additional agents, including clofazimine (CLF), linezolid (LNZ), moxifloxacin (MXF) or minocycline. Recent studies showed promising activity against Mab by bedaquiline (BDQ), rifabutin (RFB) and other drugs [14,15,16,17]. A recent paper reported that the combination BDQ-AMK-RFB was bactericidal against AR and nutrient-starved Mab [18], but no information was shown on its activity under hypoxic conditions, which may mimic the environment of the hypoxic biofilm in the alveoli of cystic fibrosis patients better than nutrient starvation.
Previous studies by our group and other investigators reported consistent activities of nitrocompounds [19,20], including metronidazole (MTR), pretomanid (PRT, formerly PA-824) and nitazoxanide (NTZ), alone and in combination, against AR and NR Mtb [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Recent trials demonstrated the potential of PRT-containing regimens against drug-susceptible and -resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) [27,28]. As for Mab, some activity of nitrocompounds such as niclosamide (NCL) was reported against nutrient-starved Mab [29], while no activities of MTR [30] and of PRT against AR Mab [31] were found.
Here, we systematically investigated whether adding nitrocompounds and other agents to drugs currently used in the therapy may improve activity against AR and NR Mab. Overall, these observations allowed us to find two combinations killing both Mab metabolic stages.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microorganisms

The M. abscessus strain 10 (Mab-10) used throughout this study was obtained from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and identified as M. abscessus abscessus by the line probe assay GenoType NTM-DR (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany). Mab-10 showed rough colonies on Middlebrook 7H10 agar (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) supplemented with 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (OADC) (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA). The strain was a clinical isolate from a lung infection.
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Mab-10 were determined by the broth microdilution method using the Sensititre RAPMYCOI plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). MICs were recorded after 5 days of incubation, with the exception of those of clarithromycin (CLR), which were recorded on days 5 and 14 in order to assess inducible CLR resistance [32]. The MICs of BDQ, RFB and CLF were performed with the same protocol of the RAPMYCOI assay. All MIC values are shown in the Supplementary Table S1. MIC interpretation was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Research Institute (CLSI) breakpoints [32] and showed that Mab-10 was susceptible only to CLR and AMK. These results were confirmed by the Whole Genome Sequence analysis of erm(41), rrl and rrs genes [5,33,34].

2.2. Growth of Mab-10 under Aerobic (A) and Hypoxic (H) Conditions

Mab-10 was grown in 20 by 125 mm screw-cap tubes containing Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco) supplemented with 10% Middlebrook albumin-dextrose-catalase (ADC) (Becton Dickinson) and stirred with 8-mm magnetic bars, mainly as described in the Mtb Wayne dormancy culture model [21,22,24,25,35]. The major difference between Mtb and Mab Wayne models is that Mab-10 was grown in 7H9 broth instead of Dubos tween albumin broth (DTA, used for Mtb), because Mab rapidly formed clumps and pellicles on the top surface of DTA culture tubes, making colony forming units (CFU) results unreliable.
For the preparation of AR aerobic (A) cells, mid-log phase cultures were diluted in 7H9 broth and transferred to tubes in 12 mL volumes. Tubes were incubated at 37 °C with loosened screw caps and stirred at 120 rpm. For the preparation of NR hypoxic (H) cells, mid-log phase cultures were diluted and transferred to tubes in 16 mL volumes, but in this case, to obtain anaerobic conditions, the caps were tightly screwed and tight rubber caps were put under the caps. H tubes were incubated at 37 °C and stirred at 120 rpm. Control H tubes with 1.5 µg/mL of methylene blue as an indicator of oxygen depletion were added in each experiment [35]. Mycobacterial growth was monitored by measuring optical density at 600 nm (OD) and CFU/mL on Middlebrook 7H10 agar plates incubated at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for about 1 week.

2.3. Measurement of Drug Activity against A and H Cells

The activity of 8 anti-Mab drugs, 9 nitro-compounds and colistin (CLS) was tested against A and H cells. The list of drugs is shown in Supplementary Table S2 [21,22,25,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. The drugs were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA). All drugs were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, with the exception of AMK and CLS, which were dissolved in distilled water.
To determine drug activity, 1-day-old aerobic (A1) cells and 5-day-old hypoxic (H5) cells were incubated with single drugs or drug combinations. Drugs (100 µL) were added by micropipette to A1 cultures and by syringe to H5 cultures (Wayne model). All drugs were used at their maximum serum concentration (Cmax), with the exception of RFB, which was used at the Cmax in the lung tissue [36], and of CLS, which was used at 25 and 100 µg/mL [47].
After incubation, at various times, 1 mL of A1 or H5 cultures was washed and resuspended in 1 mL of 7H9 broth, and 0.2 mL was inoculated in Middlebrook 7H10 agar plates for CFU determination and in liquid medium (Bactec MGIT 960 system; Becton Dickinson) for the determination of the number of days to reach a growth unit of ≥75 (days to positivity (DTP)). Mab killing was defined as a lack of regrowth in MGIT tubes after >50 days of incubation, which is similar to our previous studies on Mtb [21,25].

3. Results

3.1. Growth of Mab-10 under A and H Conditions

Figure 1 shows the growth of A and H cells by measuring CFU and OD for 40 days. The CFU and OD of A cultures increased up to day 10 and then remained quite stable up to day 40. Contrastingly, the OD of H cultures was not paralleled by CFU, which sharply decreased by 3 log10 from day 10 to 21, followed by stabilization to about 103 CFU/mL. After adding methylene blue to some H tubes as an oxygen indicator, fading and full decolourization of the dye occurred on days 3 and 5, respectively, indicating that anaerobic conditions developed on day 5.

3.2. Activity of the Combination BDQ-AMK-RFB

It has been recently reported that the combination BDQ-AMK-RFB was bactericidal against AR and nutrient-starved Mab [18]. Here, we investigated the activity of BDQ-AMK-RFB under hypoxic conditions to mimic low oxygen levels in the mucus and biofilm of the alveoli of cystic fibrosis patients and the lung cavity of individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [1,8]. Figure 2 shows the activity of BDQ-AMK-RFB and its components against A1 and H5 cells. Bedaquiline inhibited A1 cells to a greater extent than AMK and RFB. BDQ-AMK-RFB, BDQ-RFB and BDQ-AMK were much more potent than single drugs, while low activity was shown for AMK-RFB. These data indicated that BDQ was the pivotal drug of BDQ-AMK-RFB. As for H5 cells, on day 15, the CFU numbers of BDQ-AMK-RFB and its components were usually >1-log lower than untreated control cells, with the activity of BDQ-AMK being similar to that of BDQ-AMK-RFB. The two-drug combination BDQ-AMK was chosen for adding other drugs in order to test new combinations against A1 and H5 cells.

3.3. Activity of Three-Drug Combinations Containing BDQ-AMK

Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the activities of BDQ-AMK plus a third drug. As for the drugs alone, on day 14 the most active agents against A1 cells were MXF and CLR (3.5–4.0 log10 CFU reduction, compared to untreated cells) and BDQ (1.9 log10 CFU reduction); all other drugs were mostly bacteriostatic. On day 14, the most active agents (alone) against H5 cells were RFB, CLR, MTR, tinidazole (TND), benznidazole (BNZ), nimorazole (NMR) and secnidazole (SCN) (0.9–1.6 log10 CFU reduction).
As for combinations, only MXF and CLF increased BDQ-AMK killing (highlighted in grey) of A1 cells on day 7 (1.0–1.5 log10 CFU reduction) and 14 (1.1–1.9 log10 CFU reduction). Instead, CLR, MTR, TND, NMR, SCN, NCL and NTZ enhanced the BDQ-AMK killing (highlighted in grey) of H5 cells on day 7 (1.6–3.0 log10 CFU reduction) but not on day 14, with the exception of CLR (1.0 log10 CFU reduction) and MTR (0.5 log10 CFU reduction). However, the addition of a third drug did not improve BDQ-AMK killing of both A1 and H5 cells.

3.4. Activity of Five-Drug Combinations

Based on data shown in Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6, long-term experiments were performed to find one or more combinations killing both A1 and H5 cells, as estimated by the lack of regrowth both in solid media (CFU in agar) and liquid media (DTP > 50 days in MGIT 960 tubes). Firstly, we tested combinations containing BDQ-AMK added with RFB (or CLF or MXF, both potentiating A1 killing) and with CLR-MTR (potentiating H5 killing) (Figure 7). BDQ-AMK-CLF-CLR-MTR decreased A1 CFU below the detection limit of the method (5 CFU/mL) in 21 days. BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR and BDQ-AMK-CLF-CLR-MTR decreased H5 CFU to <5/mL in 42 days, with the first combination lowering CFU more rapidly than the second. Lower activity was shown by BDQ-AMK-MXF-CLR-MTR.
With the aim to primarily kill drug-tolerant H5 cells, we selected BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR for further experiments. Furthermore, we substituted the fifth drug (MTR) with a nitrocompound that showed promising activity as a BDQ-AMK enhancer, namely TND, SCN and NMR (Figure 5). Figure 8 showed that, out of the four combinations tested, BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-NMR and BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR decreased H5 CFU to <5/mL in 35–42 days. BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-TND, BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-SCN and BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-NMR, but not BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR, decreased A1 CFU to <5 CFU/mL in 35 days.
However, to ascertain cell death, aliquots of drug-exposed cells were also inoculated in MGIT 960 liquid medium (Table 1). As shown by the lack of regrowth in MGIT tubes, BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-NMR killed A1 and H5 cells in 42 days. BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR killed H5 cells in 56 days, while regrowth was seen for A1 cells. BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-TND and BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-SCN killed A1 cells in 42 days, while regrowth was seen for H5 cells.

3.5. Activity of BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR plus CLS

Given the difficulty of finding combinations that killed both A1 and H5 cells, we also tested the activity of BDQ-AMK plus CLS. The activity of BDQ-AMK against A1 and H5 cells was greatly enhanced by 25 and 100 µg/mL CLS on day 7 and 14 (Figure 9).
Furthermore, BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR-CLS100 decreased A1 and H5 CFU more efficiently than BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR (Figure 10) and, unlike BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR, killed both A1 and H5 cells, as shown by the lack of regrowth in MGIT of A1 cells in 42 days and of H5 cells in 56 days (Table 2). Lower activity against A1 and H5 cells was shown by BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR-CLS25.

4. Discussion

M. abscessus is a multidrug-resistant pathogen that has emerged as a global threat in people affected by chronic lung diseases [1,2,3,4]. The organism is an obligate aerobe, but anaerobic conditions like those met in the mucus and biofilm of patients with cystic fibrosis induce the formation of extremely drug-tolerant persisters [10]. In this study, we showed that the patterns of growth of Mab-10 A and H cells were different, with a sharp decrease in H CFU after 10 days and the survival of persisters containing 102–103 CFU/mL.
Firstly, we examined whether the combination BDQ-AMK-RFB, recently described as being active against AR and nutrient-starved Mab [18], was also active in hypoxia. Overall, our data showed that BDQ-AMK-RFB had low levels of activity against H5 cells, consistent with the persistence of drug-tolerant anaerobic Mab in patients, which are indeed rarely cured by antibiotics, even after years of treatment [10]. Due to the comparable activity of BDQ-AMK and BDQ-AMK-RFB against A1 and H5 cells, we then screened three-drug combinations containing BDQ-AMK plus CLR, CLF, RFB, MXF, LNZ, TGC, nitrocompounds, or CLS. The killing of A1 cells by BDQ-AMK was enhanced by CLF, MXF and CLS. As for CLF, reactive oxygen species (ROS)-based killing of Mab [5] and Mtb [48] were reported. As for MFX, a DNA gyrase inhibitor of Mab and Mtb [5], BDQ-MXF-containing combinations showed to be promising regimens against human TB [27]. The killing of H5 cells was enhanced by CLR, nitrocompounds and CLS. Clarithromycin was active both alone and by enhancing BDQ-AMK killing, in keeping with CLR activity reported against biofilm-growing Mab [10].
The bimodal killing curves shown by H5 cells treated with BDQ-AMK plus, in particular, CLR, MTR, NMR, SCN or CLS are typical of bacterial persistence. Indeed, the CFU curves were characterized by the first part with the steepest slope (up to day 7), in which the sensitive cells were killed, and a second part, which was flat or with a reduced slope of 1.4–2.4 log10 CFU/mL of drug-tolerant surviving cells on day 14 [49]. Bimodal curves were also formed by A1 cells treated with BDQ-AMK plus, in particular, MXF, CLF and CLS. Persisters are likely formed in the hypoxic mucus and biofilm in the alveoli of cystic fibrosis patients, contributing to months/years of drug combination treatments not eradicating them.
Nitrocompounds are known for their ability to generate reactive nitrogen species (RNS) in hypoxic conditions [19,20]. In Mtb, the nitro-imidazole PRT killed NR cells by intracellular nitric oxide release [50], and PRT-containing combinations showed to be promising regimens for the treatment of drug-susceptible and -resistant TB [27,28].
Prior to this study, no major information had been reported on the anti-Mab activity of nitrocompounds and CLS. Here, we found that MTR, TND, SCN, NMR and CLS were active against H5 cells both alone and by enhancing BDQ-AMK killing. Furthermore, we found that a five-drug combination containing NMR (BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-NMR) killed (DTP ≥ 50 days) A1 + H5 cells in 42 days. The 5-nitroimidazole NMR is active against amoebiasis [51] and trichomoniasis [52], but it is also used as a radiosensitizer to treat head and neck squamous cell carcinomas for sensitizing hypoxic cells to the lethal effects of ionising radiation due to its high electron affinity [53]. At the minimum dose of 1.5 g NMR/day, 5 days a week for 6–7 weeks (Cmax 36.8 ± 1.3 µg/mL), the side-effects profile of this drug was acceptable, with no lasting toxicity. At higher clinically tolerable doses, Cmax of 50 µg/mL was reached [53]. Our data showed that BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-NMR killed A1 + H5 cells in 42 days; therefore, 6 weeks of treatment with this combination could potentially eradicate Mab. The observation that, among the 5-nitro-imidazoles tested, NMR was the best to enhance A1 + H5 killing, may be tentatively explained with the knowledge that, in hypoxia, the reduction in the nitrogroup produces a nitroradical ion (attacking H5 cells), while, under aerobic conditions, the nitro-radical ion is re-oxidized to form a reactive superoxide anion (attacking A1 cells) [19,20]. This process is known as a “futile cycle”, but, of course, specific studies on the issue are needed.
In the continuous search for new Mab-killing combinations, we also found that BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR-CLS100 killed A1 + H5 cells in 56 days. Colistin is a membrane-targeting cation polypeptide inhaled two/three times daily in cystic fibrosis patients infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa [54,55]. The drug is nebulized as colistimethate sodium and is found up to ≥128 µg/mL levels in sputum [47]. Colistin is a potentiator of anti-TB drugs [56] and acts by disrupting the Mtb cell wall [57]. In a recent study on new anti-persisters antibiotics, it was found that the lowest numbers of persisters were observed in bacteria treated with molecules targeting the cell membrane, and that CLS was the most effective out of 54 drugs examined [58]. Colistin-treated Acinetobacter baumannii cells formed high levels of ROS, supporting the significance of these molecules in decreasing persistence [59]. A ROS-mediated death could also explain our present observations that A1 (but not H5) cells were efficiently killed in a dose-response fashion after the addition of CLS to BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR (100 µg/mL were more active than 25 µg/mL CLS).
Overall, in this study, we found two combinations (BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-NMR and BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR-CLS100) killing persister-containing A1 + H5 cells. We are aware that these combinations contain many drugs, but current anti-Mab therapies also involve the administration of several antibiotics for months or years that do not eradicate the organism [10,13]. Thus, the search for new combinations is an urgent necessity. A limitation of this investigation is that our findings on strain Mab-10 may not be necessarily generalized to all Mab isolates, requiring answers in future studies. In this view, we are currently performing studies to find whether these two combinations, or shorter ones, kill A1 + H5 cells generated from Mab isolates in cystic fibrosis.
In conclusion, the combinations found here showed that it is possible to kill persister-containing Mab cells. Furthermore, we think that our A1 + H5 assay, coupled with a demonstration of the lack of regrowth of drug-treated Mab in solid and liquid media, is a useful tool to find novel anti-mycobacterial combinations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10071421/s1, Table S1: MICs of Mab-10. Table S2: drugs tested.

Author Contributions

L.F. and F.G. conceived and designed the experiments; A.L., E.B. and A.I. performed the experiments; C.R., L.G., L.F. and F.G. analysed the data; L.F. and F.G. wrote the manuscript; A.L., E.B., A.I., C.R., L.G., L.F. and F.G. revised the manuscript; L.F. and F.G acquired funding. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Italian Cystic Fibrosis Research Foundation, Grants FFC#12/2020 with the contribution of Delegazione FFC di Como Dongo and “In memory of Franco Miliotti”, and FFC#17/2021 with the contribution of Delegazione FFC of Como Dongo and Delegazione FFC of Roma Pomezia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study did not require ethical approval.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, M.L.; Aziz, D.B.; Dartois, V.; Dick, T. NTM drug discovery: Status, gaps and the way forward. Drug Discov. Today 2018, 23, 1502–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Degiacomi, G.; Sammartino, J.C.; Chiarelli, L.R.; Riabova, O.; Makarov, V.; Pasca, M.R. Mycobacterium abscessus, an Emerging and Worrisome Pathogen among Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ryan, K.; Byrd, T.F. Mycobacterium abscessus: Shapeshifter of the Mycobacterial World. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lopeman, R.C.; Harrison, J.; Desai, M.; Cox, J.A.G. Mycobacterium abscessus: Environmental Bacterium Turned Clinical Nightmare. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Johansen, M.D.; Herrmann, J.L.; Kremer, L. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria and the rise of Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 392–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Brugha, R.; Spencer, H. Mycobacterium abscessus in cystic fibrosis. Science 2021, 372, 465–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elborn, J.S. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 2016, 388, 2519–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fennelly, K.P.; Ojano-Dirain, C.; Yang, Q.; Liu, L.; Lu, L.; Progulske-Fox, A.; Wang, G.P.; Antonelli, P.; Schultz, G. Biofilm Formation by Mycobacterium abscessus in a Lung Cavity. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 193, 692–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stewart, P.S.; White, B.; Boegli, L.; Hamerly, T.; Williamson, K.S.; Franklin, M.J.; Bothner, B.; James, G.A.; Fisher, S.; Vital-Lopez, F.G.; et al. Conceptual Model of Biofilm Antibiotic Tolerance That Integrates Phenomena of Diffusion, Metabolism, Gene Expression, and Physiology. J. Bacteriol. 2019, 201, e00307-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yam, Y.K.; Alvarez, N.; Go, M.L.; Dick, T. Extreme Drug Tolerance of Mycobacterium abscessus “Persisters”. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Clary, G.; Sasindran, S.J.; Nesbitt, N.; Mason, L.; Cole, S.; Azad, A.; McCoy, K.; Schlesinger, L.S.; Hall-Stoodley, L. Mycobacterium abscessus Smooth and Rough Morphotypes Form Antimicrobial-Tolerant Biofilm Phenotypes but Are Killed by Acetic Acid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01782-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Bryant, J.M.; Grogono, D.M.; Rodriguez-Rincon, D.; Everall, I.; Brown, K.P.; Moreno, P.; Verma, D.; Hill, E.; Drijkoningen, J.; Gilligan, P.; et al. Emergence and spread of a human-transmissible multidrug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacterium. Science 2016, 354, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Floto, R.A.; Olivier, K.N.; Saiman, L.; Daley, C.L.; Herrmann, J.L.; Nick, J.A.; Noone, P.G.; Bilton, D.; Corris, P.; Gibson, R.L.; et al. US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and European Cystic Fibrosis Society. US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and European Cystic Fibrosis Society consensus recommendations for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in individuals with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 2016, 71 (Suppl. 1), i1–i22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ganapathy, U.S.; Dartois, V.; Dick, T. Repositioning rifamycins for Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2019, 14, 867–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Gumbo, T.; Cirrincione, K.; Srivastava, S. Repurposing drugs for treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus: A view to a kill. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 1212–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Le Moigne, V.; Raynaud, C.; Moreau, F.; Dupont, C.; Nigou, J.; Neyrolles, O.; Kremer, L.; Herrmann, J.L. Efficacy of Bedaquiline, Alone or in Combination with Imipenem, against Mycobacterium abscessus in C3HeB/FeJ Mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00114-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meir, M.; Barkan, D. Alternative and Experimental Therapies of Mycobacterium abscessus Infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, J.; Ammerman, N.; Agarwal, A.; Naji, M.; Li, S.Y.; Nuermberger, E. Differential In Vitro Activities of Individual Drugs and Bedaquiline-Rifabutin Combinations against Actively Multiplying and Nutrient-Starved Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, e02179-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nepali, K.; Lee, H.Y.; Liou, J.P. Nitro-Group-Containing Drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 2851–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Olender, D.; Żwawiak, J.; Zaprutko, L. Multidirectional Efficacy of Biologically Active Nitro Compounds Included in Medicines. Pharmaceuticals 2018, 11, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Piccaro, G.; Giannoni, F.; Filippini, P.; Mustazzolu, A.; Fattorini, L. Activities of drug combinations against Mycobacterium tuberculosis grown in aerobic and hypoxic acidic conditions. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 1428–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Piccaro, G.; Poce, G.; Biava, M.; Giannoni, F.; Fattorini, L. Activity of lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs against dormant and replicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Antibiot. 2015, 68, 711–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Iacobino, A.; Piccaro, G.; Giannoni, G.; Mustazzolu, A.; Fattorini, L. Fighting tuberculosis by drugs targeting nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli. Int. J. Mycobacteriol. 2017, 6, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Iacobino, A.; Piccaro, G.; Giannoni, F.; Mustazzolu, A.; Fattorini, L. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Is Selectively Killed by Rifampin and Rifapentine in Hypoxia at Neutral pH. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02296-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Iacobino, A.; Giannoni, F.; Pardini, M.; Piccaro, G.; Fattorini, L. The Combination Rifampin-Nitazoxanide, but Not Rifampin-Isoniazid-Pyrazinamide-Ethambutol, Kills Dormant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Hypoxia at Neutral pH. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e00273-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Mudde, S.E.; Upton, A.M.; Lenaerts, A.; Bax, H.I.; De Steenwinkel, J.E.M. Delamanid or pretomanid? A Solomonic judgement! J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022, 77, 880–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tweed, C.D.; Dawson, R.; Burger, D.A.; Conradie, A.; Crook, A.M.; Mendel, C.M.; Conradie, F.; Diacon, A.H.; Ntinginya, N.E.; Everitt, D.E.; et al. Bedaquiline, moxifloxacin, pretomanid, and pyrazinamide during the first 8 weeks of treatment of patients with drug-susceptible or drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: A multicentre, open-label, partially randomised, phase 2b trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2019, 7, 1048–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Conradie, F.; Diacon, A.H.; Ngubane, N.; Pauline Howell, P.; Everitt, D.; Crook, A.M.; Mendel, C.M.; Egizi, E.; Moreira, J.; Timm, J.; et al. Treatment of Highly Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Berube, B.J.; Castro, L.; Russell, D.; Ovechkina, Y.; Parish, T. Novel Screen to Assess Bactericidal Activity of Compounds Against Non-replicating Mycobacterium abscessus. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Mukherjee, T.; Boshoff, H.; Barry, C.E., 3rd. Comment on: Identification of antimicrobial activity among FDA-approved drugs for combating Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium chelonae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 252–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhang, F.; Li, S.; Wen, S.; Zhang, T.; Shang, Y.; Huo, F.; Xue, Y.; Li, L.; Pang, Y. Comparison of in vitro Susceptibility of Mycobacteria Against PA-824 to Identify Key Residues of Ddn, the Deazoflavin-Dependent Nitroreductase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardia spp., and Other Aerobic Actinomycetes; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-1-68440-028-7. [Google Scholar]
  33. McKenna, A.; Hanna, M.; Banks, E.; Sivachenko, A.; Cibulskis, K.; Kernytsky, A.; Garimella, K.; Altshuler, D.; Gabriel, S.; Daly, M.; et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wayne, L.G.; Hayes, L.G. An in vitro model for sequential study of shiftdown of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through two stages of nonreplicating persistence. Infect. Immun. 1996, 64, 2062–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Blaschke, T.F.; Skinner, M.H. The clinical pharmacokinetic of rifabutin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1996, 22 (Suppl. 1), S15–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Rodvold, K.A. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Clarithromycin. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1999, 37, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Muralidharan, G.; Micalizzi, M.; Speth, J.; Raible, D.; Troy, S. Pharmacokinetics of tigecycline after single and multiple doses in healthy subjects. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. MacGowan, A.P. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of linezolid in healthy volunteers and patients with Gram-positive infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51 (Suppl. S2), ii17–ii25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Penkitis, H.; Adetoro, N. A review of the pharmacokinetic properties of SYM-1219, a single oral dose granule formulation containing 2 g of secnidazole, for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 217, 715–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fung, H.B.; Doan, T.-L. Tinidazole: A nitroimidazole antiprotozoal agent. Clin. Ther. 2005, 27, 1859–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Steib, A.; Jacoberger, B.; Von Bandel, M.; Beck, F.; Beller, J.P.; Boudjema, K.; Koffel, J.C.; Otteni, J.C. Concentrations in plasma and tissue penetration of ceftriaxone and ornidazole during liver transplantation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1993, 37, 1873–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Overgaard, J.; Overgaard, M.; Timothy, A.R. Studies of the pharmacokinetic properties of nimorazole. Br. J. Cancer 1983, 48, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Montero, M.; Mir, M.; Sulleiro, E.; Avalos Esquivel, J.L.; García López, E.; Molina-Morant, D.; Montesinos, I.L.; Sorlí, L.; Veliz Espinosa, G.; Mounteis Oliva, E.; et al. High-dose benznidazole in a 62-year-old Bolivian kidney transplant recipient with Chagas central nervous system involvement. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 78, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Burock, D.; Daum, D.; Tröger, H.; Kim, T.D.; Krüger, S.; Rieke, D.T.; Ochsenreither, S.; Welter, K.; Herrmann, P.; Sleegers, A.; et al. Niclosamide a new chemotherapy agent? Pharmacokinetics of the potential anticancer drug in a patient cohort of the NIKOLO trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36 (Suppl. 15), e14536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wijma, R.A.; Huttner, A.; Koch, B.C.P.; Mouton, J.W.; Muller, A.E. Review of the pharmacokinetic properties of nitrofurantoin and nitroxoline. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 2916–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Schuster, A.; Haliburn, C.; Döring, G.; Goldman, M.H.; Freedom Study Group. Safety, efficacy and convenience of colistimethate sodium dry powder for inhalation (Colobreathe DPI) in patients with cystic fibrosis: A randomised study. Thorax 2013, 68, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Yano, T.; Kassovska-Bratinova, S.; Teh, J.S.; Winkler, J.; Sullivan, K.; Isaacs, A.; Schechter, N.M.; Rubin, H. Reduction of clofazimine by mycobacterial type 2 NADH:quinone oxidoreductase: A pathway for the generation of bactericidal levels of reactive oxygen species. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 10276–10287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Boldrin, F.; Provvedi, R.; Cioetto Mazzabò, L.; Segafreddo, G.; Manganelli, R. Tolerance and Persistence to Drugs: A Main Challenge in the Fight against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Singh, R.; Manjunatha, U.; Boshoff, H.I.; Ha, Y.H.; Niyomrattanakit, P.; Ledwidge, R.; Dowd, C.S.; Lee, I.Y.; Kim, P.; Zhang, L.; et al. PA-824 kills nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis by intracellular NO release. Science 2008, 322, 1392–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pamba, H.O.; Estambale, B.B.A.; Chunge, C.N.; Donno, L. Comparative study of aminosidine, etophamide and nimorazole, alone or in combination, in the treatment of intestinal amoebiasis in Kenya. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1990, 9, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Roy, R.B.; Laird, S.M.; Heasman, L. Treatment of trichomoniasis in the female. A comparison of metronidazole and nimorazole. Br. J. Vener Dis. 1975, 51, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Metwally, M.A.H.; Jansen, J.A.; Overgaard, J. Study of the Population Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Nimorazole in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated in the DAHANCA-5 Trial. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 27, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Maselli, D.J.; Keyt, H.; Restrepo, M.I. Inhaled Antibiotic Therapy in Chronic Respiratory Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Taccetti, G.; Francalanci, M.; Pizzamiglio, G.; Messore, B.; Carnovale, V.; Cimino, G.; Cipolli, M. Cystic Fibrosis: Recent Insights into Inhaled Antibiotic Treatment and Future Perspectives. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bax, H.I.; de Steenwinkel, J.E.M.; ten Kate, M.T.; van der Meijden, A.; Verbon, A.; Bakker-Woudenberg, I.A.J.M. Colistin as a potentiator of anti-TB drug activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 2828–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Koen, N.; van Breda, S.V.; Loots, D.T. Elucidating the antimicrobial mechanisms of colistin sulfate on Mycobacterium tuberculosis using metabolomics. Tuberculosis 2018, 111, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Salcedo-Sora, J.E.; Kell, D.B. A Quantitative Survey of Bacterial Persistence in the Presence of Antibiotics: Towards Antipersister Antimicrobial Discovery. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kaur, A.; Sharma, P.; Capalash, N. Curcumin alleviates persistence of Acinetobacter baumannii against colistin. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 10 01421 g001 550
Figure 1. Growth of Mab-10 in aerobic (A), and hypoxic (H) conditions (Wayne dormancy culture model). Means ± standard deviations of colony forming units (CFU)/ml and optical density (OD) values are shown.
Figure 1. Growth of Mab-10 in aerobic (A), and hypoxic (H) conditions (Wayne dormancy culture model). Means ± standard deviations of colony forming units (CFU)/ml and optical density (OD) values are shown.
Microorganisms 10 01421 g001
Microorganisms 10 01421 g002 550
Figure 2. Survival of A1 and H5 cells of Mab-10 after exposure to bedaquiline (BDQ)-amikacin (AMK)-rifabutin (RFB), 2-drug components, and single drugs, as estimated by CFU counts. A representative experiment out of two is shown.
Figure 2. Survival of A1 and H5 cells of Mab-10 after exposure to bedaquiline (BDQ)-amikacin (AMK)-rifabutin (RFB), 2-drug components, and single drugs, as estimated by CFU counts. A representative experiment out of two is shown.
Microorganisms 10 01421 g002
Microorganisms 10 01421 g003 550
Figure 3. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of 3-drug combinations containing bedaquiline-amikacin (BDQ-AMK). (A,E) BDQ-AMK and its components BDQ and AMK; (B,F) BDQ-AMK ± rifabutin (RFB); (C,G) BDQ-AMK ± clarithromycin (CLR); (D,H) BDQ-AMK ± moxifloxacin (MXF). Increases in the activities of (BDQ-AMK + third drug) versus BDQ-AMK are highlighted in grey.
Figure 3. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of 3-drug combinations containing bedaquiline-amikacin (BDQ-AMK). (A,E) BDQ-AMK and its components BDQ and AMK; (B,F) BDQ-AMK ± rifabutin (RFB); (C,G) BDQ-AMK ± clarithromycin (CLR); (D,H) BDQ-AMK ± moxifloxacin (MXF). Increases in the activities of (BDQ-AMK + third drug) versus BDQ-AMK are highlighted in grey.
Microorganisms 10 01421 g003
Microorganisms 10 01421 g004 550
Figure 4. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of 3-drug combinations containing bedaquiline-amikacin (BDQ-AMK). (A,E) BDQ-AMK ± clofazimine (CLF); (B,F) BDQ-AMK ± linezolid (LNZ); (C,G) BDQ-AMK ± tigecycline (TGC); (D,H) BDQ-AMK ± metronidazole (MTR). Increases in the activities of (BDQ-AMK + third drug) versus BDQ-AMK are highlighted in grey.
Figure 4. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of 3-drug combinations containing bedaquiline-amikacin (BDQ-AMK). (A,E) BDQ-AMK ± clofazimine (CLF); (B,F) BDQ-AMK ± linezolid (LNZ); (C,G) BDQ-AMK ± tigecycline (TGC); (D,H) BDQ-AMK ± metronidazole (MTR). Increases in the activities of (BDQ-AMK + third drug) versus BDQ-AMK are highlighted in grey.
Microorganisms 10 01421 g004
Microorganisms 10 01421 g005 550
Figure 5. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of 3-drug combinations containing bedaquiline-amikacin (BDQ-AMK). (A,E) BDQ-AMK ± tinidazole (TND); (B,F) BDQ-AMK ± benznidazole (BNZ); (C,G) BDQ-AMK ± nimorazole (NMR); (D,H) BDQ-AMK ± secnidazole (SCN). Increases in the activities of (BDQ-AMK + third drug) versus BDQ-AMK are highlighted in grey.
Figure 5. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of 3-drug combinations containing bedaquiline-amikacin (BDQ-AMK). (A,E) BDQ-AMK ± tinidazole (TND); (B,F) BDQ-AMK ± benznidazole (BNZ); (C,G) BDQ-AMK ± nimorazole (NMR); (D,H) BDQ-AMK ± secnidazole (SCN). Increases in the activities of (BDQ-AMK + third drug) versus BDQ-AMK are highlighted in grey.
Microorganisms 10 01421 g005
Microorganisms 10 01421 g006 550
Figure 6. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of 3-drug combinations containing bedaquiline-amikacin (BDQ-AMK). (A,E) BDQ-AMK ± niclosamide (NCL); (B,F) BDQ-AMK ± nitazoxanide (NTZ); (C,G) BDQ-AMK ± ornidazole (ORN); (D,H) BDQ-AMK ± nitroxoline (NTR). Increases in the activities of (BDQ-AMK + third drug) versus BDQ-AMK are highlighted in grey.
Figure 6. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of 3-drug combinations containing bedaquiline-amikacin (BDQ-AMK). (A,E) BDQ-AMK ± niclosamide (NCL); (B,F) BDQ-AMK ± nitazoxanide (NTZ); (C,G) BDQ-AMK ± ornidazole (ORN); (D,H) BDQ-AMK ± nitroxoline (NTR). Increases in the activities of (BDQ-AMK + third drug) versus BDQ-AMK are highlighted in grey.
Microorganisms 10 01421 g006
Microorganisms 10 01421 g007 550
Figure 7. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of 5-drug combinations containing BDQ-AMK added with RFB (or CLF or MXF, both potentiating A1 cells), and with CLR-MTR (potentiating H5 cells). Dashed lines indicate the limit of detection (5 CFU/mL). A representative experiment out of two is shown.
Figure 7. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of 5-drug combinations containing BDQ-AMK added with RFB (or CLF or MXF, both potentiating A1 cells), and with CLR-MTR (potentiating H5 cells). Dashed lines indicate the limit of detection (5 CFU/mL). A representative experiment out of two is shown.
Microorganisms 10 01421 g007
Microorganisms 10 01421 g008 550
Figure 8. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR, without or with substitution of MTR with TND, SCN or NMR. Dashed lines indicate the limit of detection (5 CFU/mL). A representative experiment out of two is shown.
Figure 8. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR, without or with substitution of MTR with TND, SCN or NMR. Dashed lines indicate the limit of detection (5 CFU/mL). A representative experiment out of two is shown.
Microorganisms 10 01421 g008
Microorganisms 10 01421 g009 550
Figure 9. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of 3-drug combinations containing bedaquiline-amikacin (BDQ-AMK) ± 25 µg/mL or 100 µg/mL of colistin (CLS). Increases in the activities of BDQ-AMK-CLS versus BDQ-AMK are highlighted in grey. Dashed lines indicate the limit of detection (5 CFU/mL).
Figure 9. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of 3-drug combinations containing bedaquiline-amikacin (BDQ-AMK) ± 25 µg/mL or 100 µg/mL of colistin (CLS). Increases in the activities of BDQ-AMK-CLS versus BDQ-AMK are highlighted in grey. Dashed lines indicate the limit of detection (5 CFU/mL).
Microorganisms 10 01421 g009
Microorganisms 10 01421 g010 550
Figure 10. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR ±25 µg/mL or 100 µg/mL of CLS. Dashed lines indicate the limit of detection (5 CFU/mL). A representative experiment out of two is shown.
Figure 10. Activity against A1 and H5 cells of BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR ±25 µg/mL or 100 µg/mL of CLS. Dashed lines indicate the limit of detection (5 CFU/mL). A representative experiment out of two is shown.
Microorganisms 10 01421 g010
Table
Table 1. Survival of A1 and H5 cells to various drug combinations, as estimated by regrowth in liquid medium using the MGIT 960 system. Day-to-positivity (DTP) values are indicated. Samples inoculated in MGIT 960 tubes refer to samples of Figure 8.
Table 1. Survival of A1 and H5 cells to various drug combinations, as estimated by regrowth in liquid medium using the MGIT 960 system. Day-to-positivity (DTP) values are indicated. Samples inoculated in MGIT 960 tubes refer to samples of Figure 8.
A1H5
DTP ± SD by Days of Drug ExposureDTP ± SD by Days of Drug Exposure
Combination714212835424956714212835424956
Control1111111112 ± 13 ± 13 ± 13 ± 13 ± 23 ± 24 ± 1
BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR22 ± 13 ± 13 ± 14 ± 15 ± 17 ± 27 ± 33 ± 15 ± 16 ± 16 ± 26 ± 27 ± 37 ± 2>50
BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-TND3 ± 13 ± 14 ± 14 ± 220 ± 5>50>50>502 ± 14 ± 14 ± 15 ± 15 ± 16 ± 27 ± 27 ± 4
BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-SCN2 ± 13 ± 14 ± 16 ± 128 ± 4>50>50>502 ± 13 ± 14 ± 15 ± 15 ± 16 ± 17 ± 47 ± 3
BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-NMR24 ± 15 ± 16 ± 125 ± 2>50>50>502 ± 15 ± 15 ± 16 ± 17 ± 3>50>50>50
Table
Table 2. Survival of A1 and H5 cells to various drug combinations, as estimated by regrowth in liquid medium using the MGIT 960 system. Day-to-positivity (DTP) values are indicated. Samples inoculated in MGIT 960 tubes refer to samples of Figure 10.
Table 2. Survival of A1 and H5 cells to various drug combinations, as estimated by regrowth in liquid medium using the MGIT 960 system. Day-to-positivity (DTP) values are indicated. Samples inoculated in MGIT 960 tubes refer to samples of Figure 10.
A1H5
DTP ± SD by Days of Drug ExposureDTP ± SD by Days of Drug Exposure
Combination714212835424956714212835424956
Control1111111113 ± 13 ± 13 ± 13 ± 23 ± 13 ± 14 ± 1
BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR12 ± 12 ± 13 ± 14 ± 14 ± 16 ± 17 ± 23 ± 14 ± 15 ± 16 ± 16 ± 17 ± 27 ± 3>50
BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR-CLS 254 ± 14 ± 14 ± 213 ± 113 ± 528 ± 528 ± 4>503 ± 14 ± 15 ± 15 ± 15 ± 16 ± 17 ± 37 ± 2
BDQ-AMK-RFB-CLR-MTR-CLS 1002 ± 13 ± 14 ± 127 ± 427 ± 4>50>50>505 ± 15 ± 26 ± 17 ± 37 ± 27 ± 219 ± 4>50
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lanni, A.; Borroni, E.; Iacobino, A.; Russo, C.; Gentile, L.; Fattorini, L.; Giannoni, F. Activity of Drug Combinations against Mycobacterium abscessus Grown in Aerobic and Hypoxic Conditions. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071421

AMA Style

Lanni A, Borroni E, Iacobino A, Russo C, Gentile L, Fattorini L, Giannoni F. Activity of Drug Combinations against Mycobacterium abscessus Grown in Aerobic and Hypoxic Conditions. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(7):1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071421

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lanni, Alessio, Emanuele Borroni, Angelo Iacobino, Cristina Russo, Leonarda Gentile, Lanfranco Fattorini, and Federico Giannoni. 2022. "Activity of Drug Combinations against Mycobacterium abscessus Grown in Aerobic and Hypoxic Conditions" Microorganisms 10, no. 7: 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071421

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop