Fungal Communities in Re-Emerging Fraxinus excelsior Sites in Lithuania and Their Antagonistic Potential against Hymenoscyphus fraxineus
by
, ,
Remigijus Bakys
1,2,*, 
Gintarė Bajerkevičienė
1,
Alfas Pliūra
1,
Adas Marčiulynas
1,
Diana Marčiulynienė
1,
Jūratė Lynikienė
1,
Valeriia Mishcherikova
1 and
Audrius Menkis
3 1
Institute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Liepu˛ Str. 1, LT-53101 Girionys, Kaunas District, Lithuania
2
Department of Forestry, Kaunas Forestry and Environmental Engineering University of Applied Sciences, Liepu˛ Str. 1, LT-53101 Girionys, Kaunas District, Lithuania
3
Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7026, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(10), 1940; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10101940
Submission received: 6 September 2022
/
Revised: 27 September 2022
/
Accepted: 27 September 2022
/
Published: 29 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Microbiology)
Abstract
:Fifty-nine fungal taxa, isolated from re-emerging Fraxinus excelsior sites in Lithuania, were in vitro tested against three strains of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus on agar media to establish their biocontrol properties. All tested fungi were isolated from leaves and shoots of relatively healthy Fraxinus excelsior trees (<30% defoliation), which were affected by ash dieback but their phytosanitary condition has not worsened during the last decade. The inhibition of H. fraxineus growth by tested fungal taxa ranged between 16–87%. Occasionally isolated fungal taxa such as Neonectria coccinea, Nothophorma quercina, and Phaeosphaeria caricis were among the most effective fungi inhibiting the growth of H. fraxineus cultures. Among the more commonly isolated fungal taxa, Cladosporium sp., Fusarium sp., Malassezia sp., and Aureobasidium pullulans showed a strong growth inhibition of H. fraxineus.
1. Introduction
Over the last two decades, the phenomenon of ash dieback of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.), caused by the invasive ascomycete Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, was reported in many European countries [1,2]. This disease results in high mortality rates and threatens F. excelsior species on a continental scale and at the same time threatens the existence of many ash-associated organisms and specific ash-dependent forest ecosystems [3]. In Lithuania, ash dieback emerged in the mid-1990s. Since then, the total area of F. excelsior stands in the country due to the impact of this epidemic decreased from 50,800 ha in 1995 to 13,013 ha in 2021, or from 2.7% to 0.6% of all forested area [4,5].
Currently, the ash-dieback epidemic in Lithuania is in its chronic phase, causing stand deterioration at much slower rates [6]. In addition, during the last decade, approx. 2000 ha of F. excelsior stands have emerged by natural regeneration [5]. Despite the fact that these stands exhibit ash-dieback symptoms of various extent, they are considered to be in stable phytosanitary conditions, i.e., surveys by Lithuanian National Forest Inventory showed that sanitary conditions remained similar during the last ten years. These stands were not subjected to sanitary fellings and due to the current phytosanitary condition were retained by forest managers.
The aims of the study were to: (a) investigate mycobiome colonizing leaves and shoots of F. excelsior trees in re-emerging stands using pure culture fungal isolations; (b) to test biocontrol properties of obtained fungal isolates against H. fraxineus in dual-culture antagonistic assays.
2. Materials and Methods
In total, ten F. excelsior stands were sampled in different regions of Lithuania (Table 1, Figure 1A). Fruiting bodies of H. fraxineus were detected at these sites (Figure 1B). The study sites were selected based on the following criteria: (a) F. excelsior constituted at least 40% of a stand composition; (b) these stands were planted or re-emerged naturally in the period of ongoing ash dieback; (c) stands were of a relatively good and stable phytosanitary condition (defoliation up to 30%), which remained similar during the last ten years.
At each study site, 12 trees of a relatively good phytosanitary condition (defoliation <30%) and situated at least 50 m from each other, were selected for sampling. Sampling was carried out in July 2019 by cutting live twigs with leaves from the lower part of the crown (4–12 m above the ground). In total, 360 samples of leaves and 360 samples of shoots (three samples of leaves and three of shoots per each tree) were collected. Within 24 h after the collection, samples were surface sterilized (brief flaming was used for shoot samples and dipping in 70% ethanol for leaf samples) and placed on 9 cm Petri dishes containing Hagem agar media [7], which was amended with 50 g/L sterilized fresh F. excelsior leaves to facilitate the growth of H. fraxineus. Plates were stored at room temperature (ca. 21°C) and checked daily for mycelial growth. Emerging fungal mycelium was sub-cultured into new plates to isolate pure cultures. Obtained pure fungal cultures were checked under a light microscope and, according to their morphological structures, were divided into different morphological groups (presumed individual taxa). One representative from each morphological group was subjected to both molecular identification of fungal taxa and antagonistic tests against three H. fraxineus strains. Molecular identification of fungal taxa was carried out using sequencing of fungal ITS rRNA as described in Marčiulynas et al. [8].
Antagonistic reaction of isolated fungi against H. fraxineus strains, which were also isolated during this study, was assessed using dual-culture assays and by evaluating the pattern and growth rate of H. fraxineus [9,10]. Petri dishes containing Hagem agar medium were pre-inoculated with an agar plug (5 × 5 mm) of respective H. fraxineus strains and left for 5 days at room temperature in the dark. On the sixth day of assay, each Petri dish with a growing colony of H. fraxineus was inoculated with an agar plug containing actively growing mycelia of the tested fungus (ca. two-week-old colony was used), which was placed at the distance of 3 cm from the point of H. fraxineus inoculation. Controls were established similarly only using H. fraxineus strains alone. All tests were established in triplicates. After three weeks, the rate of H. fraxineus growth inhibition was assessed using the formula Rk − ((Rh2 − Rh1)/2)/Rk × 100, where Rk is a radial mycelial growth of H. fraxineus colony in control plates, Rh2 is a radial mycelial growth of H. fraxineus mycelium in dual culture plates, and Rh1 is a radial mycelial growth of H. fraxineus mycelium towards the inoculation point of the tested fungus.
Inhibition rates caused in each in vitro assay were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons between all pairs of means. The statistical analysis was performed using Minitab v.19 (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA) statistical software package.
3. Results and Discussion
Isolation and molecular identification showed the presence of 59 fungal taxa (Table 2).
Out of these, 56 fungal taxa were identified at least to the genus level, while three taxa remained unidentified. Most frequently isolated fungi from shoots were Alternaria alternata, Apiospora montagnei, Gibberella avenacea, and Phoma sp. (Table 2). Most frequently isolated fungi from leaves were A. alternata, Aureobasidium pullulans, Apiospora montagnei, and G. avenacea. The fungal taxa detected in shoots and leaves of F. excelsior were similar to those reported in numerous other culture-based studies [11,12,13,14]. However, high-throughput sequencing of the shoot and leave samples collected in the present study revealed a very contrasting fungal community structure [15]. Evidently, each of the aforementioned fungal detection methods has its advantages and shortcomings, suggesting that the use of both methods can provide valuable complementary information.
Dual culture assays revealed the presence of three types of fungal interactions: A—deadlock; B—antibiosis; and C—replacement (Figure 2).
During dual culture assays, the B type of mycelial interactions was the most common output (41.1%), while A and C types were observed less frequently (30.3% and 28.6%, respectively) (Figure 3).
In comparison to self-inhibition of H. fraxineus in dual-culture assays, thirty-six tested fungal taxa significantly suppressed the growth of H. fraxineus, while eight of the tested taxa significantly enhanced the growth of H. fraxineus (p < 0.05, Figure 3). Among the fungi most effectively limiting the growth of H. fraxineus (Figure 3), there were the pathogenic ascomycete Nothophorma quercina, which is known as a fungus causing shoot cankers and leaf spots [16], and Phaeosphaeria caricis (inhibition factor 87% and 82%, respectively). The other fungi effectively inhibiting the growth of H. fraxineus were Neonectria coccinea, Lophiostoma corticola, Cytospora pruinosa, Penicillium flavigenum, Cladosporium sp., and Fusarium solani (inhibition factor between 75% and 78%, Figure 3). The rate of growth inhibition of H. fraxineus for remaining fungal taxa ranged between 16% and 74%. Among the fungal taxa frequently detected in leaves and shoots of F. excelsior, Malassezia sp. (inhibition factor 74%) and A. pullulans (71%) showed a strong antagonistic reaction against H. fraxineus. In comparison, the interspecific dual-culture test between the two different H. fraxineus strains showed that the inhibition factor was 57%. Cladosporium sp. (inhibition factor 76%) was relatively infrequently isolated in the present study (Table 2), but it was among the dominating fungi in a high-throughput sequencing study [15], therefore this particular fungal taxon can be regarded as frequent in nature.
We conclude that the results of the present study provided valuable information on the potential suitability of different fungal taxa for the biocontrol of H. fraxineus. Among all fungal taxa tested only Cladosporium sp. and A. pullulans can be considered as frequent in nature and effective growth inhibitors of H. fraxineus. Several species within the genus Cladosporium, which is the common cosmopolitan endophytic genus, were previously shown in a number of studies as potential agents in protecting plants against different biotic and abiotic stresses and as enhancers of plant growth [17,18,19]. Aureobasidium pullullans was shown to be able to inhibit post-harvest pathogens of fruits [20]. Results of dual-culture assays in our study are in agreement with the results of other similar studies [10,21] where a significant effect on the growth inhibition of H. fraxineus by these two fungal taxa was also reported. In support, a negative correlation between H. fraxineus and Cladosporium sp. was also found in shoots of F. excelsior [15]. Cladosporium sp. in our tests was not only among the fungi showing the strongest reaction of inhibition of H. fraxineus, but it also was able to show the overgrowth of H. fraxineus, suggesting the potential antagonism in nature [9]. On the other hand, A. pullulans and Cladosporium sp. were frequently reported as fungi associated with F. excelsior [13,22,23], indicating that H. fraxineus can possibly co-exist with these ascomycetes in vivo or it is able to avoid the direct confrontation due to seasonal succession of these fungi on tissues of F. excelsior [13]. It should also be noted that fungal taxa, which showed the strongest reaction of growth inhibition of H. fraxineus in dual-culture assays, were fast-growing fungi. The possibility should not be excluded that this property facilitated the overgrowth of H. fraxineus, which generally exhibits slower growth rates. Therefore, it is possible that the inhibition of H. fraxineus in tissues of F. excelsior depends on the composition of the entire fungal community rather than on a few individual fungal taxa. Biocontrol tests using selected fungal taxa under in vivo conditions could provide new valuable insights on this important research topic.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, D.M., R.B. and A.M. (Audrius Menkis); methodology, D.M., R.B., A.M. (Adas Marčiulynas), V.M. and A.M. (Audrius Menkis); validation, R.B., A.P., G.B., J.L. and A.M. (Adas Marčiulynas); formal analysis, R.B., A.P. and A.M. (Audrius Menkis); investigation, R.B., A.P., A.M. (Audrius Menkis), J.L. and D.M.; resources, D.M.; data curation, A.P. and A.M. (Adas Marčiulynas); writing—original draft preparation, R.B.; writing—review and editing, A.M. (Audrius Menkis), A.P. and J.L.; visualization, A.P., A.M. (Audrius Menkis) and R.B.; supervision, A.M. (Audrius Menkis); project administration, D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This project has received funding from European Social Fund (project No. 09.3.3-LMT-K-712-01-0039) under grant agreement with the Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data is available upon request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- CABI. Invasive Species Compendium—Hymenoscyphus Fraxineus (Ash Dieback). Available online: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108083#tosummaryOfInvasiveness (accessed on 10 June 2022).
- Baral, H.O.; Queloz, V.; Hosoya, T. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, the correct scientific name for the fungus causing ash dieback in Europe. IMA Fungus 2014, 5, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pautasso, M.; Aas, G.; Queloz, V.; Holdenrieder, O. European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback—A conservation biology challenge. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 158, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anonymous. Lietuvos Miškų Ūkio Statistika [Lithuanian Statistical Yearbook of Forestry]; Valstybinė miškų tarnyba, Lututė: Kaunas, Lithuania, 2001; pp. 1–112. [Google Scholar]
- Anonymous. Lietuvos Miškų Ūkio Statistika [Lithuanian Statistical Yearbook of Forestry]; Valstybinė miškų tarnyba, Lututė: Kaunas, Lithuania, 2021; pp. 1–184. [Google Scholar]
- Grigaliūnas, K. Lithuanian State Forest Service, Kaunas, Lithuania. Personal Communication. 22th May 2021.
- Stenlid, J. Population structure of Heterobasidion annosum as determined by somatic incompatibility, sexual incompatibility, and isoenzyme patterns. Can. J. Bot. 1985, 6, 2268–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marčiulynas, A.; Marčiulynienė, D.; Lynikienė, J.; Gedminas, A.; Vaičiukynė, M.; Menkis, A. Fungi and oomycetes in the irrigation water of forest nurseries. Forests 2020, 11, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalski, T.; Bilański, P. Fungi detected in the previous year’s leaf petioles of Fraxinus excelsior and their antagonistic potential against Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Forests 2021, 12, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haňáčková, Z.; Havrdová, L.; Černý, K.; Zahradník, D.; Koukol, O. Fungal endophytes in ash shoots—Diversity and inhibition of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Balt. For. 2017, 23, 89–106. [Google Scholar]
- Bakys, R.; Vasaitis, R.; Barklund, P.; Ihrmark, K.; Stenlid, J. Investigations concerning the role of Chalara fraxinea in declining Fraxinus excelsior. Plant Pathol. 2009, 58, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davydenko, K.; Vasaitis, R.; Stenlid, J.; Menkis, A. Fungi in foliage and shoots of Fraxinus excelsior in eastern Ukraine: A first report on Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus. For. Pathol. 2013, 43, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cross, H.; Sønstebø, J.H.; Nagy, N.E.; Timmermann, V.; Solheim, H.; Børja, I.; Kauserud, H.; Carlsen, T.; Rzepka, B.; Wasak, K.; et al. Fungal diversity and seasonal succession in ash leaves infected by the invasive ascomycete Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 1405–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lahiri, A.; Murphy, B.R.; Hodkinson, T.R. Assessing genotypic and environmental effects on endophyte communities of Fraxinus (ash) using culture dependent and independent DNA sequencing. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bakys, R.; Pliūra, A.; Bajerkevičienė, G.; Marčiulynas, A.; Marčiulynienė, D.; Lynikienė, J.; Menkis, A. Mycobiota associated with symptomatic and asymptomatic Fraxinus excelsior in Post-Dieback Forest Stands. Forests 2022, 13, 1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, Y.H.; Oh, M.H. First Report of Nothophoma quercina causing shoot canker on Chaenomeles sinensis in Korea. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 2533–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Răut, I.; Călin, M.; Capră, L.; Gurban, A.-M.; Doni, M.; Radu, N.; Jecu, L. Cladosporium sp. isolate as fungal plant growth promoting agent. Agronomy 2021, 11, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almatar, M.; Makky, E.A. Cladosporium cladosporioides from the perspectives of medical and biotechnological approaches. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rashmi, R.; Siddalingamurthy, K.R. Cladosporium tenuissiumum—A new producer of xyloglucanase–specific endoglucanase. Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci. 2013, 4, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira-Pinto, M.M.; Moura-Guedes, M.C.; Santos, M.R.; Silva, M.J.; Barreiro, M.G.; Santos, M. The Antagonistic activity of Aureobasidium pullulans to reduce blue mold in ‘Rocha’ pear. Acta Hortic. 2008, 800, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, R.; Ulrich, K.; Behrendt, U.; Kube, M.; Ulrich, A. Analyzing ash leaf-colonizing fungal communities for their biological control of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 590944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agostinelli, M.; Nguyen, D.; Witzell, J.; Cleary, M. Mycobiome of Fraxinus excelsior with different phenotypic susceptibility to ash dieback. Front. For. Glob. Change 2021, 4, 580514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agan, A.; Drenkhan, R.; Adamson, K.; Tedersoo, L.; Solheim, H.; Børja, I.; Matsiakh, I.; Timmermann, V.; Nagy, N.E.; Hietala, A.M. The relationship between fungal diversity and invasibility of a foliar niche—The case of ash dieback. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
(A) Naturally re-emerged Fraxinus excelsior stand (site U2); (B) Hymenoscyphus fraxineus fruiting bodies on ash petioles at the U2 site.
Figure 1.
(A) Naturally re-emerged Fraxinus excelsior stand (site U2); (B) Hymenoscyphus fraxineus fruiting bodies on ash petioles at the U2 site.
Figure 2.
The outcome of dual culture screening assay between Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (on the left) and different tested fungi (on the right). (A) Both fungi meet and form a barrage zone–deadlock reaction; (B) The inhibition zone is formed between H. fraxineus and the tested fungus–antibiosis reaction; (C) The tested fungus shows the overgrowth of H. fraxineus–replacement reaction.
Figure 2.
The outcome of dual culture screening assay between Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (on the left) and different tested fungi (on the right). (A) Both fungi meet and form a barrage zone–deadlock reaction; (B) The inhibition zone is formed between H. fraxineus and the tested fungus–antibiosis reaction; (C) The tested fungus shows the overgrowth of H. fraxineus–replacement reaction.
Figure 3.
The effect of grown inhibition of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus by fungal taxa isolated from shoots and leaves of Fraxinus excelsior. Next to the species names, A denotes A type (deadlock) of mycelial interaction; B—B type (antibiosis); and C—C type (replacement). The symbol * denotes significantly higher or significantly lower growth inhibition of H. fraxineus compared to H. fraxineus self-inhibition (marked in red). The output of interaction is shown as the average value of inhibition factor ± SD. X-axis represents inhibition rate (%).
Figure 3.
The effect of grown inhibition of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus by fungal taxa isolated from shoots and leaves of Fraxinus excelsior. Next to the species names, A denotes A type (deadlock) of mycelial interaction; B—B type (antibiosis); and C—C type (replacement). The symbol * denotes significantly higher or significantly lower growth inhibition of H. fraxineus compared to H. fraxineus self-inhibition (marked in red). The output of interaction is shown as the average value of inhibition factor ± SD. X-axis represents inhibition rate (%).
Table 1.
Fraxinus excelsior sites in Lithuania investigated in the present study.
| Site | Latitude, N | Longitude, E | Tree Age, y | Tree Species Composition, % * | Mean Annual Temperature, °C | Mean Annual Precipitation, mm | Stand Origin ** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U1 (Žeimelis) | 56°16′37.1″ | 24°02′33.0″ | 10–25 | 70F,10P,10B,10U | 6.3 | 620 | S |
| U2 (Kėdainiai) | 55°13′35.4″ | 23°57′58.5″ | 15–20 | 90F,10P | 6.7 | 600 | S |
| U3 (Šakiai) | 55°01′49.8″ | 23°00′20.2″ | 15–20 | 100F | 7.0 | 650 | S |
| U4 (Telšiai) | 56°03′43.4″ | 22°25′08.3″ | 17 | 70F,30Q | 6.3 | 800 | P |
| U5 (Šakiai) | 55°00′50.2″ | 23°04′00.9″ | 15–25 | 70F,10P,10B,10S | 7.0 | 650 | S |
| U6 (Dubrava) | 54°44′20.6″ | 23°47′38.8″ | 17 | 100F | 6.8 | 650 | P |
| U7 (Telšiai) | 56°03′33.8″ | 22°25′37.6″ | 17 | 70F,30Q | 6.3 | 800 | P |
| U8 (Pakruojis) | 56°00′38.4″ | 23°55′48.5″ | 15–20 | 90F,10P | 6.5 | 600 | S |
| U9 (Jonava) | 55°09′11.1″ | 24°06′56.8″ | 7–10 | 70F,30Q | 6.7 | 620 | S |
| U10 (Dubrava) | 54°45′07.4″ | 23°47′53.5″ | 15–17 | 80F,10P,10B | 6.8 | 650 | S |
* F—Fraxinus excelsior, P—Populus tremula, Q—Quercus robur, B—Betula pendula, U—Ulmus sp., S—Picea abies, ** S—self-regenerated, P—progeny trial.
Table 2.
Frequencies of fungi isolated from shoots and leaves of F. excelsior.
| Fungal Taxa | No. of Pure Cultures/% | |
|---|---|---|
| Shoots | Leaves | |
| Alternaria alternata | 87/10.9 | 71/22.5 |
| Apiospora montagnei | 65/8.2 | 44/13.9 |
| Aspergillus sp. | 2/0.3 | -/- |
| Aspergillus sp. | 6/0.8 | -/- |
| Aureobasidium pullulans | 6/0.8 | 43/13.6 |
| Bjerkandera adusta | 12/1.5 | -/- |
| Boeremia exigua | 14/1.8 | 12/3.8 |
| Chaetomium globosum | 24/3.0 | -/- |
| Cytospora pruinosa | 2/0.3 | -/- |
| Cladosporium allicinum | 6/0.8 | 7/2.2 |
| Coniochaeta sp. | 4/0.5 | -/- |
| Coniothyrium sp. | 3/0.4 | -/- |
| Coprinellus disseminatus | 9/1.1 | -/- |
| Cosmospora sp. | 1/0.1 | 3/0.9 |
| Daldinia sp. | 2/0.3 | -/- |
| Diaporthe eres | 21/2.6 | 4/1.2 |
| Diplodia fraxini | 11/11.4 | 3/0.9 |
| Epicoccum nigrum | 49/6.2 | 14/4.4 |
| Eutypa lata | 21/2.6 | 12/3.8 |
| Fusarium graminearum | 3/0.4 | -/- |
| Fusarium lateritium | 7/0.9 | 4/1.2 |
| Fusarium oxysporum | 3/0.4 | 2/0.6 |
| Fusarium sambucinum | 2/0.3 | -/- |
| Fusarium solani | 1/0.1 | 1/0.3 |
| Fusarium tricinctum | 2/0.3 | 2/0.6 |
| Gibberella avenacea | 54/6.8 | 24/7.6 |
| Hymenoscyphus fraxineus | 1/0.1 | -/- |
| Hypoxylon fuscum | 19/2.4 | 3/0.9 |
| Hypoxylon rubiginosum | 13/1.6 | 5/1.5 |
| Jackrogersella multiformis | 2/0.3 | -/- |
| Lewia sp. | 16/2.0 | -/- |
| Linnemannia zychae | 1/0.1 | -/- |
| Lophiostoma corticola | 4/0.5 | -/- |
| Malassezia sp. | 52/6.5 | 7/2.2 |
| Meyerozyma sp. | 3/0.4 | -/- |
| Mortierella zychae | 6/0.8 | 14/4.3 |
| Nectria cinnabarina | 3/0.4 | -/- |
| Nemania serpens | 7/0.9 | 2/0.6 |
| Neonectria coccinea | 5/0.6 | -/- |
| Nigrospora oryzae | 12/1.5 | 3/0.9 |
| Nothophoma quercina | 1/0.1 | -/- |
| Paraophiobolus arundinis | 2/0.3 | -/- |
| Paraphaeosphaeria neglecta | 3/0.4 | 4/1.2 |
| Penicillium digitatum | 20/2.5 | -/- |
| Penicillium flavigenum | 6/0.8 | -/- |
| Periconia byssoides | 17/2.1 | 7/2.2 |
| Phaeosphaeria caricis | 3/0.4 | 4/1.2 |
| Phoma macrostoma | 67/8.4 | 11/3.4 |
| Phomopsis sp. | 15/1.9 | -/- |
| Praetumpfia obducens | 3/0.4 | -/- |
| Sarocladium strictum | 44/5.5 | 7/2.2 |
| Sclerostagonospora fusiformis | 3/0.4 | -/- |
| Seimatosporium sp. | 2/0.3 | -/- |
| Valsa cypri | 15/0.9 | -/- |
| Xylaria hypoxylon | 2/0.3 | 2/0.6 |
| Xylaria vasconica | 7/0.9 | 1/0.3 |
| Unidentified sp. | 5/0.6 | -/- |
| Unidentified sp. | 1/0.1 | -/- |
| Unidentified sp. | 2/0.3 | -/- |
| Total | 779/100 | 316/100 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Bakys, R.; Bajerkevičienė, G.; Pliūra, A.; Marčiulynas, A.; Marčiulynienė, D.; Lynikienė, J.; Mishcherikova, V.; Menkis, A. Fungal Communities in Re-Emerging Fraxinus excelsior Sites in Lithuania and Their Antagonistic Potential against Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1940. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10101940
AMA Style
Bakys R, Bajerkevičienė G, Pliūra A, Marčiulynas A, Marčiulynienė D, Lynikienė J, Mishcherikova V, Menkis A. Fungal Communities in Re-Emerging Fraxinus excelsior Sites in Lithuania and Their Antagonistic Potential against Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(10):1940. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10101940
Chicago/Turabian StyleBakys, Remigijus, Gintarė Bajerkevičienė, Alfas Pliūra, Adas Marčiulynas, Diana Marčiulynienė, Jūratė Lynikienė, Valeriia Mishcherikova, and Audrius Menkis. 2022. "Fungal Communities in Re-Emerging Fraxinus excelsior Sites in Lithuania and Their Antagonistic Potential against Hymenoscyphus fraxineus" Microorganisms 10, no. 10: 1940. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10101940
APA StyleBakys, R., Bajerkevičienė, G., Pliūra, A., Marčiulynas, A., Marčiulynienė, D., Lynikienė, J., Mishcherikova, V., & Menkis, A. (2022). Fungal Communities in Re-Emerging Fraxinus excelsior Sites in Lithuania and Their Antagonistic Potential against Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Microorganisms, 10(10), 1940. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10101940
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
