Next Article in Journal
SARS-CoV-2: The Impact of Co-Infections with Particular Reference to Mycoplasma pneumonia—A Clinical Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Different Impacts of Heat-Killed and Viable Lactiplantibacillus plantarum TWK10 on Exercise Performance, Fatigue, Body Composition, and Gut Microbiota in Humans
Previous Article in Journal
The Viral Fraction Metatranscriptomes of Lake Baikal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Inulin-Based Prebiotics Alone or in Combination with Probiotics on Human Gut Microbiota and Markers of Immune System: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Healthy Subjects
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Gut Microbiota at Different Developmental Stages of Apis cerana Reveals Potential Probiotic Bacteria for Improving Honeybee Health

Microorganisms 2022, 10(10), 1938; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10101938
by Pham Thi Lanh 1,2, Bui Thi Thuy Duong 1, Ha Thi Thu 1, Nguyen Thi Hoa 1, Mi Sun Yoo 3, Yun Sang Cho 3,* and Dong Van Quyen 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Microorganisms 2022, 10(10), 1938; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10101938
Submission received: 18 August 2022 / Revised: 26 September 2022 / Accepted: 28 September 2022 / Published: 29 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Beneficial Microbes and Gastrointestinal Microbiota)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I believe this study is meaningful as a study of the gut microbiota at different developmental stages of honey bee.

For future readers, I hope you can describe how this gut microbiota research can be used for human microbiota research.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript presents an interesting study with practical applications about the variation of gut microbiota in Apis cerana at different life stages (larvae, pupae, and adults) which could have results for improving honeybee health.

Comments

Line 178 Figure 2 - Actinobacteria

ETC - I think that instead of "ETC" the expression "other bacteria" should be used, which would be better to be mentioned at the end, after Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes.

pg 5 line 185, 186 - for larval gut microbiota "Three dominant families were Lactobacillaceae (47.9%), Enterococcaceae (35%), and Acetobacteraceae (15%) (Fig.3)" - if Firmicutes represent 79.4%, and Lactobacillaceae (47.9%) and Enterococcaceae (35%) together represent 82%, how were these percentages calculated?

pg 6 line 202 Sphingomanas pruni - Sphingomonas

202 - Sphingomonadaceae is (15%), but Sphingomonas pruni group is (15.3%), greater than 15%, how were these values ​​calculated? Something seems incorrect.

        202- Lachnospiraceae (8%), but Lachnospiriraceae_uc (8.16%), - how these values ​​were calculated, is not clear

258, 260 - L. plutonius - M. plutonius

- The conclusions are too broad, the authors should show what are the most significant results obtained

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This manuscript reported the gut bacteria changes at different life stages of honeybee A.cerana,  suggesting an important role of gut bacteria in honeybee’s development. It provides useful information for beekeeping. However, the study did not investigate whether the gut bacteria changes at different life stages of honeybee A.cerana modulate the honeybee’s development via changing the gut bacteria. Thus, it is better to add relative information.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop