Next Article in Journal
LPV/Polytopic Stabilization Control and Estimation in Robotics
Previous Article in Journal
Robust Attitude Stabilization of Rigid Bodies Based on Control Lyapunov Function: Experimental Verification on a Quadrotor Testbed
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Small Frontier: Trends Toward Miniaturization and the Future of Planetary Surface Rovers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Robust and Non-Fragile Path Tracking Control for Autonomous Vehicles

1
Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Tech University of Korea, Siheung 15073, Republic of Korea
2
Mechanical Design Engineering, Tech University of Korea, Siheung 15073, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Actuators 2025, 14(11), 510; https://doi.org/10.3390/act14110510
Submission received: 12 September 2025 / Revised: 10 October 2025 / Accepted: 17 October 2025 / Published: 22 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Actuators for Surface Vehicles)

Abstract

Path tracking is a fundamental function for autonomous vehicles, but its performance often degrades under parameter variations and controller fragility—an issue seldom addressed together in prior studies. This paper develops a robust non-fragile Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) using linear matrix inequality (LMI) optimization, explicitly considering uncertainties in vehicle speed, mass, and cornering stiffness as well as gain perturbations from implementation. A two-degrees-of-freedom bicycle model is employed for controller design, and a weighted least-squares allocation method integrates multiple actuators, including front steering, rear steering, four-wheel independent drive, and braking. A double lane-change maneuver in CarSim evaluates the proposed design. The robust and non-fragile LQR maintains lateral offset within 0.02 m and overshoot below 1% under ±20% parameter variation, offering improved stability margins compared with the baseline LQR. The results highlight context-dependent actuator effects and clarify the trade-off between control complexity, robustness, and real-world applicability.
Keywords: path tracking control; robust non-fragile control; Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR); control allocation; autonomous vehicles path tracking control; robust non-fragile control; Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR); control allocation; autonomous vehicles

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, I.; Nah, J. Robust and Non-Fragile Path Tracking Control for Autonomous Vehicles. Actuators 2025, 14, 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/act14110510

AMA Style

Lee I, Nah J. Robust and Non-Fragile Path Tracking Control for Autonomous Vehicles. Actuators. 2025; 14(11):510. https://doi.org/10.3390/act14110510

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Ilhan, and Jaewon Nah. 2025. "Robust and Non-Fragile Path Tracking Control for Autonomous Vehicles" Actuators 14, no. 11: 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/act14110510

APA Style

Lee, I., & Nah, J. (2025). Robust and Non-Fragile Path Tracking Control for Autonomous Vehicles. Actuators, 14(11), 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/act14110510

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop