Next Article in Journal
Adaptive Predefined Time Control for Strict-Feedback Systems with Actuator Quantization
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical and Experimental Study of a Wearable Exo-Glove for Telerehabilitation Application Using Shape Memory Alloy Actuators
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Vibration Reduction Effect of Piezoelectric Actuation on Flexible Tilting Pad Bearings with Different Structural Parameters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Morphing Spoiler for Adaptive Aerodynamics by Shape Memory Alloys
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Adaptive Nonsingular Fast Terminal Sliding Mode Control for Shape Memory Alloy Actuated System

Actuators 2024, 13(9), 367; https://doi.org/10.3390/act13090367
by Xiaoguang Li 1,2, Wenzhuo Zhi 2,3, Enming Shi 2,3, Xiaoliang Fan 2, Ming Zhao 2,* and Bi Zhang 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Actuators 2024, 13(9), 367; https://doi.org/10.3390/act13090367
Submission received: 2 August 2024 / Revised: 11 September 2024 / Accepted: 17 September 2024 / Published: 19 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) Actuators and Their Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript presents a novel ANFTSMC method, which is a fusion of NFTSMC and VGESO. It is able to estimate the unmodeled dynamics, compensate for the hysteresis nonlinearity and improve the control performance of prosthetic finger actuated by shape memory alloy. The NFTSMC control scheme can avoid singular problems and decrease chattering. The superiority of the proposed  ANFTSMC control algorithm against the ESCM control algorithm is experimentally demonstrated. The ANFTSMC algorithm is applied to a prosthetic hand robot system experimentally.

The manuscript is well written, quite easy to read. Of course, the Lypunov stability analysis is difficult to follow. I found some ideas how to improve the text:

Q1: What are functions f1(*) and g1(*) in eq. (1)? I couldn't find the detailed description of the both functions in [36] (line 129) as is written in the text. Is the numbering of the literature [36] correct?

Q2: I also don't understand the parameters in the Table 1, because the mathematical model is unknown (not described in the manuscript). Remark: I tried to open the link Download the un-published material, but I was unable to open it. Maybe, the mathematical model and Table 1 parameters are described there, but I couldn't see them (???).

Q3: Lines 171, 178, 208: Lemma 1 is unknown, again! It doesn't exist in [37].

Q4: Figs. 3, 4, 5 and 6: The actual output curves are dotted black lines and not solid lines as described in the captions of the figures. You should make them equal!

Q5: According to explanation in lines 302-309, there is something wrong in the fig. 19. I think, the color of curves (red and blue) for both signals must be opposite!

Q6: The experiments shown in the manuscript show, that an angular movement of the fingers are quite slow in comparison to human hand. Can you describe what is the highest angular speed of the finger in the closed loop control experiment?

Q7: Can you also describe, what is the highest force of the finger?

Q8:  According to strict rules of the MDPI Actuators journal "all manuscripts must contain the required sections: Author Information, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Materials & Methods, Results, Conclusions". Your organization of section does not contain the section Materials@Methods. So I advise you to reorganize the section names according to the above mentioned rules. I also suggest to simply introduce the new section Materials&Methods as section 2 and make present sections 2,3 and 4 as subsections of the new section 2. The name of section 5 has to be changed to Results.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

It is good!

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The article is well written and interesting for the reader. It presents theoretical and experimental studies carried out on shape memory alloy.  All parameters and details are listed in the article. However, I would recommend that the geometrical properties are given. Because it is not only the material or the length of the SMA that matters.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop