Next Article in Journal
Clinical Characteristics of Acute Hepatitis E and Their Correlation with HEV Genotype 3 Subtypes in Italy
Next Article in Special Issue
Biological and Genomic Characterization of a Novel Jumbo Bacteriophage, vB_VhaM_pir03 with Broad Host Lytic Activity against Vibrio harveyi
Previous Article in Journal
Feed Supplementation with a Commercially Available Probiotic Solution Does Not Alter the Composition of the Microbiome in the Biofilters of Recirculating Aquaculture Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isolation, Characterization, and Application of a Bacteriophage Infecting the Fish Pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/pathogens9100831
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bacteriophage Cocktail for the Prevention of Multiple-Antibiotic-Resistant and Mono-Phage-Resistant Vibrio coralliilyticus Infection in Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) Larvae

by
Hyoun Joong Kim
1,
Jin Woo Jun
2,
Sib Sankar Giri
1,
Sang Guen Kim
1,
Sang Wha Kim
1,
Jun Kwon
1,
Sung Bin Lee
1,
Cheng Chi
3,* and
Se Chang Park
1,*
1
Laboratory of Aquatic Biomedicine, College of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
2
Department of Aquaculture, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries, Jeonju 54874, Korea
3
Laboratory of Aquatic Nutrition and Ecology, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2020, 9(10), 831; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100831
Submission received: 1 September 2020 / Revised: 9 October 2020 / Accepted: 10 October 2020 / Published: 11 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phage Therapy in Aquaculture: Current Developments and Future Challenges)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vibrio coralliilyticus (V. coralliilyticus) is a pathogen that causes mass mortality in marine bivalve hatcheries worldwide. In this study, we used a bacteriophage (phage) cocktail to prevent multiple-antibiotic-resistant (MAR) and phage-resistant (PR) V. coralliilyticus infection in Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae. To prevent the occurrence of phage-resistant strains and decrease the effect of mono-phage treatment, we prepared a phage cocktail containing three types of V. coralliilyticus-specific phages and tested its prophylactic efficacy against MAR and PR V. coralliilyticus infection. The results of the cell lysis test showed that the phage cocktail showed an excellent bactericidal effect against the MAR and PR variants in contrast to the experimental group treated with two mono phages (pVco-5 and pVco-7). An in vivo test using Pacific oyster larvae also confirmed the preventive effect against MAR and PR variants. In conclusion, the application of the phage cocktail effectively prevented V. coralliilyticus infection in marine bivalve seedling production. Furthermore, it is expected to reduce damage to the aquaculture industry caused by the occurrence of MAR and PR V. coralliilyticus. Therefore, phage cocktails may be used for the control of various bacterial diseases.

1. Introduction

The marine bivalve culture industry has been the largest sector of the aquaculture industry worldwide since the development of the aquaculture industry. In 2018, it accounted for 62.7% (15,821,176 tons) of the total production of marine animals (25,233,162 tons), including fish and crustaceans [1]. Therefore, the industry for producing artificial seedlings of various marine bivalves is also actively developing. However, diseases in marine bivalve hatcheries that occur due to Vibrio sp. [2,3,4,5,6] and Ostreid Herpesvirus-1 [7,8,9,10,11,12] infections cause economic losses worldwide.
In marine bivalve hatcheries, Vibrio coralliilyticus (V. coralliilyticus) is one of the major causative agents of drastic mass mortality in a short period when larvae are at the free-swimming stage [4,5,13]. To control V. coralliilyticus infection in marine bivalve hatcheries, many studies have been conducted on the application of various antibiotics, noting problems such as the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant variants and environmental pollution due to the indiscriminate use of antibiotics in seedling production facilities [14,15].
Due to problems associated with the use of antibiotics, such as the occurrence of resistant bacteria, environmental contamination, and the killing of nonpathogenic bacteria, research has been actively performed on the development of alternative antibiotics. Among these alternative approaches is the potential prophylactic and therapeutic use of bacteriophages (phages) for the treatment of bacterial infections. In the aquaculture field, the problem of antibiotic abuse has been continuously emphasized, and alternative studies on the application of bacteriophages have been actively performed in invertebrate [16,17,18,19,20,21] and fish [22,23,24,25]. However, if the phage used also has low infectivity, it can induce phage resistance variants [26,27,28]. Therefore, the application of a phage cocktail is suggested to prevent the induction of mono-phage-resistant variants [27,29,30,31]. In addition, the use of phage cocktails is suggested to prevent various species of bacterial infections using each specific phage against the host bacteria [27,32].
The present study was aimed at preventing mass mortality in marine bivalve hatcheries, caused by multiple-antibiotic-resistant and phage-resistant V. coralliilyticus, using a phage cocktail. We induced a mono-phage-resistant variant. We also prepared a phage cocktail using three types of V. coralliilyticus-specific phages, and we evaluated the phage cocktail through in vitro and in vivo tests to confirm its prophylactic efficacy against a mono-phage-resistant variant.

2. Results

2.1. Induction of Phage-Resistant Variant

Whereas pVco-7-resistant Vco58 colonies were observed, pVco-5- and pVco-14-resistant colonies were not induced under the conditions conducted in the present study (Figure 1a). Thus, we designated the pVco-7-resistant variant as VcoR-7. The induced variant was reidentified via a phage susceptibility test using other phages. The results of the pathogenicity test of VcoR-7 are shown in Figure 1b. The VcoR-7-treated group (1.87 × 104 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL) showed a cumulative mortality of 32.15% ± 1.45% after 24 h of exposure. When concentrations of 1.87 × 105 CFU/mL and 1.87 × 106 CFU/mL were used, each group showed a cumulative mortality of 66.03% ± 3.38% and 98.93% ± 1.5%, respectively, after 24 h. In the case of the 1.87 × 107 CFU/mL-inoculated group, all larvae died within 12 h. On the other hand, only the larvae group without bacterial inoculation, which was treated only with pVco-C had a 100% survival rate. In this study, VcoR-7 also showed high pathogenicity with its parent Vco58 [16].

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of the Phage-Resistant Variant

The results of the antibiotic disk diffusion test are mentioned in Table 1. VcoR-7 is susceptible to Cefuroxime sodium, Imipenem, Gentamicin, Tetracycline, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, Ofloxacin Sulfonamides, Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and Chloramphenicol, whereas VcoR-7 has a strong resistance to Ampicillin, Ampicillin-sulbactam, Cefepime, Cefotaxime, Cefoxitin, Ceftazidime, and Meropenem and had a weak resistance to Amoxicillin-clavulanate and Piperacillin-tazobactam and Amikacin.

2.3. The Bactericidal Effects of Each Phage and pVco-C against VcoR-7

The bactericidal effects of each phage and pVco-C against VcoR-7 are shown in Figure 2. The Optical density 600 nm (OD600) value of all control groups (multiplicity of infection (MOI): 0) continuously increased during the incubation. In the case of pVco-5-treated groups, no increase in the OD value was observed in the MOI of 10, but the MOI of 0.1 and 1 showed more than 60% of the OD value of the control (MOI: 0) after 24 h (Figure 2a). In the case of pVco-7, the OD value continuously increased in the group treated with VcoR-7, similar to the control, regardless of the MOI value (Figure 2b). In contrast, pVco-14 showed a strong cell lysis effect regardless of the MOI value (Figure 2c). These results showed pVco-14 had a bactericidal efficacy against VcoR-7 similar to that previously reported for its parent strain, Vco58 [16]. pVco-C also showed a strong bactericidal efficacy in both groups infected with VcoR-7 (Figure 2d). Based on the above results, VcoR-7 showed a strong sensitivity to pVco-14 and a high titer of pVco-5. According to the results of the cell lysis test, pVco-C showed a bactericidal effect similar to that of pVco-14. VcoR-7 has a strong resistance to pVco-7. Additionally, pVco-5 showed a weak bactericidal effect when the MOI values were 0.1 and 1. These findings suggest that pVco-14 is the main contributor to the strong bactericidal effect of pVco-C.

2.4. Pacific Oyster Larvae Infection Prevention Using Various Concentrations of pVco-5, pVco-7, pVco-14, and pVco-C

In the in vivo test results of pVco-5, there was no significant difference in cumulative mortality compared to the control-2, except for the 107 plaque-forming units per milliliter (PFU/mL)-treated group (Figure 3a). In addition, pVco-7 showed no protective effect on the infection with VcoR-7 (Figure 3b). Meanwhile, pVco-14 and pVco-C showed less than 40% cumulative mortality in various concentrations in phage-treated groups (Figure 3c,d). The results of the in vivo test were remarkably similar to those of the in vitro test. The utilization of a phage cocktail, which aimed to compensate for the disadvantage of using a single phage, showed strong preventive effects in in vitro and in vivo tests.

3. Discussion

The emergence of multiple-antibiotic-resistant bacteria continues to be a problem due to the misuse of various antibiotics in aquaculture industries. As a result, limiting the application of antibiotics in this industry is becoming an urgent need. Thus, the aim of several studies in this field is the identification and development of alternative strategies, such as vaccination [33], and the use of bacteriophages [34], probiotics [35], and immunostimulants [36]. Vaccination is an ideal method to prevent diseases caused by pathogen infections, but it cannot be applied to invertebrates because of the absence of an acquired immune system. Therefore, the phage application is actively studied to prevent bacterial infection in invertebrates and has shown a substantial prophylactic efficacy [16,17].
However, phage-resistant strains may also be induced. In fact, the pVco-7-resistant variant induced in our study did not show sensitivity to pVco-7 in the in vitro and in vivo tests. In the present study, pVco-C showed bactericidal effects similar to those of the pVco-14 mono-phage treatment. This suggests that pVco-14 is the most effective at lysing VcoR-7. The pVco-14-resistant variant was not induced in this study. However, it could be speculated that the advantage of using pVco-C, instead of pVco-14, is superior due to the fact that it could prevent a possible emergence of single-phage-resistant mutants after the long-term usage of a mono-phage. Therefore, a phage cocktail could be utilized to prevent the emergence of phage-resistant bacteria that may occur when a mono-phage is applied. pVco-5, pVco-7, and pVco-14 have been reported to inhibit Vco58 and other V. coralliilyticus strains at 27 °C [16,17], indicating that the three phages are suitable for bivalve hatchery environments.
In general, a phage cocktail can be utilized not only for the prevention and treatment of various bacterial infections but, also, for the control of phage-resistant bacteria that may occur during mono-phage application [26]. In the present study, we used a phage cocktail to prevent the occurrence of phage-resistant variants and confirmed the bactericidal effects of pVco-C in in vitro experiments. The phage resistance mechanisms of bacteria have been widely studied, including the prevention of phage adsorption, blocking of phage receptors, production of extracellular matrix, and production of competitive inhibitors [30]. The use of cocktail phages can arise a competition for the same receptor in each phage. If there is the same infection mechanisms between used phages, phage cocktails do not show infectivity against the mono-phage-resistant strain. In the present study, pVco-5 and pVco-14 showed a bactericidal effect against the pVco-7-resistant variant. It means that both phages do not show the same mechanisms to infect the host cell in comparison with pVco-7. Therefore, it is suggested that the infectious mechanism of each phage used in preparation of phage cocktails should be considered.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strain and Growth Conditions

V. coralliilyticus 58 (designated Vco58), a highly virulent strain against Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae [5,16], was used as a host for phage isolation and propagation. Sodium chloride (final concentration 2.0%) supplemented with tryptic soy agar (TSA; BD Difco, Sparks, MD, USA), tryptic soy broth (TSB; BD Difco, Sparks, MD, USA), and semi-solid TSB top agar were used for bacterial growth and phage propagation. Vco58 and phage-resistant strains were cultured in an incubator at 27 °C for 24 h.

4.2. Phage Cocktail Preparation

Three previously isolated V. coralliilyticus specific phages, pVco-5 and pVco-7 [17] and pVco-14 [16], were used to prepare the phage cocktail (designated pVco-C) (Figure 4). All phages were confirmed as lytic phages through the whole-genome sequence analysis [37], unpublished data. Phages were purified using the Caesium chloride density gradient method [38] and adjusted to a concentration of 109 plaque-forming units per milliliter (PFU/mL) and mixed in a ratio of 1:1:1.

4.3. Induction of Phage-Resistant Variants of V. coralliilyticus

Ten milliliters of each pure phage suspension (≥108 PFU/mL) were mixed with 100 mL of Vco58 cultured in TSB (106 CFU/mL). After gentle blending, the mixture was incubated in a shaking incubator at 27 °C and 150 rpm for 24 h. One hundred microliters of cultured lysates were mixed with 3 mL of TSB top agar. After gentle mixing, the cells were spread onto TSA and incubated at 27 °C for two days. If colonies occurred on the plate, they were re-cultured in TSB at 27 °C and 150 rpm for 12 h. Then, 100 µL of the bacterial suspension was spread onto a TSA plate. Ten microliters of the previously inoculated phage (≥109 PFU/mL) were subsequently dripped onto the bacterial lawns and incubated at 27 °C for 24 h. If phage plaques were not observed, the spot assay using the strains that did not form plaques were repeated, and cultures that produced no plaque were chosen as phage-resistant strains.

4.4. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of the Phage-Resistant Variant

The antimicrobial susceptibility test of the pVco-7-resistant strain was carried out using 21 antibiotics by using the disk-diffusion method following the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) recommendations [39]. The used antibiotic disks are listed in Table 1. A standard disk diffusion test was performed on Muller Hinton Agar (BD Difco, Sparks, MD, USA). With the exception of temperature, all experimental conditions were performed following the CLSI guidelines. The antimicrobial susceptibility test was not conducted at 35 ± 2 °C, as suggested by CLSI, but at 27 °C, the optimal growth temperature of V. coralliilyticus and the incubation temperature of Pacific oyster larvae. The results were interpreted according to CLSI guidelines. Escherichia coli, ATCC 25922, was used as the quality control strain.

4.5. Pathogenicity of the Phage-Resistant Variant

Five-day-old healthy Pacific oyster larvae (100–140 µm) were used to confirm the pathogenicity of the phage-resistant variant. A challenge test was performed as previously described by Kim et al. [4]. Oyster larvae (n = 50 ± 13) were placed into each well of a 6-well cell culture plate (SPL, Pocheon, Korea) with 10 mL of 32 practical salinity units (psu) of filtered and sterilized seawater (FSS). The phage-resistant variant was inoculated into each well, and the final concentrations were adjusted to 0, 1.87 × 104, 1.87 × 105, 1.87 × 106 CFU, and 1.87 × 107 CFU/mL, and incubated at 27 °C for 24 h. To evaluate the toxicity of the phage cocktail, the pVco-C-treated group without bacterial inoculation was also used. The cumulative mortality of each well was monitored at 6-h intervals using an inverted microscope BX41 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The pathogenicity tests were performed in triplicate.

4.6. Bacterial Cell Lysis Test of the Phage-Resistant Variant

To evaluate the bactericidal effect of each phage and pVco-C, the phage-resistant variant induced in this study was used as the host. Bacterial cell lysis tests were performed as previously described by Kim et al. [17]. The multiplicity of infection (MOIs) of each phage and pVco-C was regulated to 0, 0.1, 1, and 10. The absorbance (OD600) of each group was checked for 24 h at 3-h intervals. All tests were conducted in six replicates.

4.7. Prophylactic Efficacy of the Phages and Phage Cocktail

For the in vivo tests, phage preparations were partially purified using 10% polyethylene glycol 8000, 1-M sodium chloride, and FSS, as previously described by Kim et al. [16]. Five-day-old healthy Pacific oyster larvae (n = 50 ± 19) were placed into each well of a 6-well cell culture plate with 10 mL of each purified phage suspension, adjusted to 104, 105, 106, and 107 PFU/mL and acclimated at 27 °C for 1 h. After adaptation, 106 CFU/mL of the phage-resistant variant solution, washed with FSS three times, was inoculated into each well and incubated for 24 h at 27 °C. The cumulative mortality was checked for 24 h at 6-h intervals. We also used two control groups, one without a phage and one without bacteria. Larvae without cilia and intravalvular movement were considered dead following the protocol previously described by Sugumar et al. [5]. The in vivo test was performed in triplicate under the same conditions.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using the SigmaPlot 14.0 software (Systat Software, Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the data followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

Like antibiotic-resistant variants, phage-resistant strains can also be induced in nature. In the present study, the pVco-7-resistant variant was induced and shown to have high pathogenicity towards Pacific oyster larvae as its parent strain. We prepared a phage cocktail to confirm its prophylactic efficacy against a mono-phage-resistant variant. The results show that this phage cocktail was found to be effective in the prevention of the mono-phage-resistant V. coralliilyticus infection in Pacific oyster larvae. This study may contribute to the reduction of the damaging effects, caused by the occurrence of multi-drug-resistant variants, to the aquaculture industry. Moreover, the use of a phage cocktail may prevent the emergence of phage-resistant bacteria that can occur during single-phage therapy and could potentially be used to control various bacterial diseases.

Author Contributions

H.J.K. and S.C.P. designed the study, and H.J.K., J.W.J., S.S.G., S.G.K., and S.W.K. conducted the experiments. J.K. and S.B.L. analyzed the data, C.C. and S.C.P. supervised and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the cooperative research program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Supportive Management Project of the Center for Companion Animals Research), the rural development administration, grant number PJ013985032020, and the Korea research fellowship program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Ministry of Science and ICT, grant number KRF: 2016H1D3A1909005.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO FishStat, Global Aquaculture Production for Species (Tonnes): Pacific Oyster. 2019. Available online: http://www.fao.org/fishery/topic/16140/en (accessed on 31 October 2019).
  2. Tubiash, H.S.; Chanley, P.E.; Leifson, E. Bacillary necrosis, a disease of larval and juvenile bivalve mollusks I. Etiology and epizootiology. J. Bacteriol. 1965, 90, 1036–1044. [Google Scholar]
  3. Elston, R.A.; Hasegawa, H.; Humphrey, K.L.; Polyak, I.K.; Häse, C.C. Re-emergence of Vibrio tubiashii in bivalve shellfish aquaculture: Severity, environmental drivers, geographic extent and management. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2008, 82, 119–134. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim, H.J.; Jun, J.W.; Giri, S.S.; Chi, C.; Yun, S.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, S.W.; Han, S.J.; Kwon, J.; Oh, W.T.; et al. Identification and genome analysis of Vibrio coralliilyticus causing mortality of Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae. Pathogens 2020, 9, 206. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sugumar, G.; Nakai, T.; Hirata, Y.; Matsubara, D.; Muroga, K. Vibrio splendidus biovar II as the causative agent of bacillary necrosis of Japanese oyster Crassostrea gigas larvae. Dis. Aquat. Org. 1998, 33, 111–118. [Google Scholar]
  6. Travers, M.-A.; Achour, R.M.; Haffner, P.; Tourbiez, D.; Cassone, A.-L.; Morga, B.; Doghri, I.; Garcia, C.; Renault, T.; Fruitier-Arnaudin, I.; et al. First description of French V. tubiashii strains pathogenic to mollusk: I. Characterization of isolates and detection during mortality events. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2014, 123, 38–48. [Google Scholar]
  7. Arzul, I.; Renault, T.; Lipart, C. Experimental herpes-like viral infections in marine bivalves: Demonstration of interspecies transmission. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2001, 46, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim, H.J.; Jun, J.W.; Giri, S.S.; Yun, S.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, S.W.; Kang, J.W.; Han, S.J.; Kwon, J.; Oh, W.T.; et al. Mass mortality in Korean bay scallop (Argopecten irradians) associated with Ostreid Herpesvirus-1 uVar. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 66, 1442–1448. [Google Scholar]
  9. Farley, C.A.; Banfield, W.G.; Kasnic, G.; Foster, W.S. Oyster herpes-type virus. Scinece 1972, 178, 759–760. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gittenberger, A.; Voorbergen-Laarman, M.; Engelsma, M. Ostreid herpesvirus OsHV-1 µVar in Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg 1793) of the Wadden Sea, a UNESCO world heritage site. J. Fish Dis. 2016, 39, 105–109. [Google Scholar]
  11. Moss, J.; Burreson, E.; Cordes, J.; Dungan, C.; Brown, G.; Wang, A.; Reece, K. Pathogens in Crassostrea ariakensis and other Asian oyster species: Implications for non-native oyster introduction to Chesapeake Bay. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2007, 77, 207–223. [Google Scholar]
  12. Renault, T.; Arzul, I. Herpes-like virus infection in hatchery-reared bivalve larvae in Europe: Specific viral DNA detection by PCR. J. Fish Dis. 2001, 24, 161–167. [Google Scholar]
  13. Richards, G.P.; Watson, M.A.; Needleman, D.S.; Church, K.M.; Häse, C.C. Mortalities of Eastern and Pacific oyster larvae caused by the pathogens Vibrio coralliilyticus and Vibrio tubiashii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 292–297. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dubert, J.; Osorio, C.R.; Prado, S.; Barja, J.L. Persistence of antibiotic resistant Vibrio spp. in shellfish hatchery environment. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 72, 851–860. [Google Scholar]
  15. Nicolas, J.L.; Corre, S.; Gauthier, G.; Robert, R.; Ansquer, D. Bacterial problems associated with scallop Pecten maximus larval culture. Dis. Aquat. Org. 1996, 27, 67–76. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, H.J.; Jun, J.W.; Giri, S.S.; Chi, C.; Yun, S.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, S.W.; Kang, J.W.; Han, S.J.; Kwon, J.; et al. Application of the bacteriophage pVco-14 to prevent Vibrio coralliilyticus infection in Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2019, 167, 107244. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, H.J.; Giri, S.S.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, S.W.; Kwon, J.; Lee, S.B.; Park, S.C. Isolation and characterization of two bacteriophages and their preventive effects against pathogenic Vibrio coralliilyticus causing mortality of Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 926. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cohen, Y.; Joseph Pollock, F.; Rosenberg, E.; Bourne, D.G. Phage therapy treatment of the coral pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus. Microbiol. Open 2013, 2, 64–74. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacquemot, L.; Bettarel, Y.; Monjol, J.; Corre, E.; Halary, S.; Desnues, C.; Bouvier, T.; Ferrier-Pages, C.; Baudoux, A.-C. Therapeutic potential of a new jumbo phage that infects Vibrio coralliilyticus, a widespread coral pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2501. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Cao, Z.; Xu, Y. Use of phages to control Vibrio splendidus infection in the juvenile sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Fish. Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 54, 302–311. [Google Scholar]
  21. Patil, J.R.; Desai, S.N.; Roy, P.; Durgaiah, M.; Saravanan, R.S.; Vipra, A. Simulated hatchery system to assess bacteriophage efficacy against Vibrio harveyi. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2014, 112, 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoai, T.D.; Mitomi, K.; Nishiki, I.; Yoshida, T. A lytic bacteriophage of the newly emerging rainbow trout pathogen Weissella ceti. Virus Res. 2018, 247, 34–39. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jun, J.W.; Kim, J.H.; Shin, S.P.; Han, J.E.; Chai, J.Y.; Park, S.C. Protective effects of the Aeromonas phages pAh1-C and pAh6-C against mass mortality of the cyprinid loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) caused by Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquaculture 2013, 416, 289–295. [Google Scholar]
  24. Park, S.C.; Shimamura, I.; Fukunaga, M.; Mori, K.I.; Nakai, T. Isolation of bacteriophages specific to a fish pathogen, Pseudomonas plecoglossicida, as a candidate for disease control. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 1416–1422. [Google Scholar]
  25. Park, S.C.; Nakai, T. Bacteriophage control of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida infection in ayu Plecoglossus altivelis. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2003, 53, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gu, J.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Han, W.; Lei, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Gao, Y.; Song, J.; Lu, R.; et al. A method for generation phage cocktail with great therapeutic potential. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31698. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chan, B.K.; Abedon, S.T.; Loc-Carrillo, C. Phage cocktails and the future of phage therapy. Future Microbiol. 2013, 8, 769–783. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nakai, T.; Sabour, P.; Griffiths, M. Application of bacteriophages for control of infectious diseases in aquaculture. In Bacteriophages in the Control of Food and Waterborne Pathogens; Sabour, P.M., Griffiths, M.W., Eds.; American Society for Microbiology Press: Washington, WA, USA, 2010; pp. 257–272. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mateus, L.; Costa, L.; Silva, Y.J.; Pereira, C.; Cunha, A.; Almeida, A. Efficiency of phage cocktails in the inactivation of Vibrio in aquaculture. Aquaculture 2014, 424, 167–173. [Google Scholar]
  30. Labrie, S.J.; Samson, J.E.; Moineau, S. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 317–327. [Google Scholar]
  31. Filippov, A.A.; Sergueev, K.V.; He, Y.; Huang, X.Z.; Gnade, B.T.; Mueller, A.J.; Fernandez-Prada, C.M.; Nikolich, M.P. Bacteriophage-resistant mutants in Yersinia pestis: Identification of phage receptors and attenuation for mice. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25486. [Google Scholar]
  32. Costa, P.; Pereira, C.; Gomes, A.T.P.C.; Almeida, A. Efficiency of single phage suspensions and phage cocktail in the inactiovation of Escherichia coli and Salmonella Typhimurium: An in vitro preliminary study. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 94. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ma, J.; Bruce, T.J.; Jones, E.M.; Cain, K.D. A review of fish vaccine development strategies: Conventional methods and modern biotechnological approaches. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 569. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nakai, T.; Park, S.C. Bacteriophage therapy of infectious diseases in aquaculture. Res. Microbiol. 2002, 153, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  35. Irianto, A.; Austin, B. Probiotics in aquaculture. J. Fish Dis. 2002, 25, 633–642. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, W.; Sun, J.; Liu, C.; Xue, Z. Application of immunostimulants in aquaculture: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Aquac. Res. 2016, 48, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim, H.J.; Jun, J.W.; Giri, S.S.; Chi, C.; Yun, S.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, S.W.; Kang, J.W.; Han, S.J.; Park, S.C. Complete genome sequence of a bacteriophage, pVco-5, that infects Vibrio coralliilyticus, which causes bacillary necrosis in Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae. Genome Announc. 2018, 6, e01143-17. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sambrook, V.; Russell, D.W. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual (3-volume set). Immunology. 2001, 49, 895–909. [Google Scholar]
  39. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria M45, 3rd ed.; CLSI Guideline M45; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Pathogens 09 00831 g001 550
Figure 1. Phage-resistant variants and their pathogenicity: (a) pVco-7-resistant Vco58 (VcoR-7) lawn (the arrowhead indicates the zone each phage was dripped on: A indicates pVco-5, B indicates pVco-7, and C indicates pVco-14) and (b) pathogenicity of VcoR-7. Control-1 indicates the larvae group with filtered and sterilized seawater (FSS), and Control-2 indicates the pVco-C-treated larvae group, without VcoR-7 inoculation. Both control groups were superimposed.
Figure 1. Phage-resistant variants and their pathogenicity: (a) pVco-7-resistant Vco58 (VcoR-7) lawn (the arrowhead indicates the zone each phage was dripped on: A indicates pVco-5, B indicates pVco-7, and C indicates pVco-14) and (b) pathogenicity of VcoR-7. Control-1 indicates the larvae group with filtered and sterilized seawater (FSS), and Control-2 indicates the pVco-C-treated larvae group, without VcoR-7 inoculation. Both control groups were superimposed.
Pathogens 09 00831 g001
Pathogens 09 00831 g002 550
Figure 2. The bactericidal effects of each phage and pVco-C against VcoR-7: (a) pVco-5, (b) pVco-7, (c) pVco-14, and (d) pVco-C against VcoR-7. The p-value for each hour was confirmed to be <0.001, except when pVco-7 was compared to the control group; multiplicity of infection (MOI): 0.
Figure 2. The bactericidal effects of each phage and pVco-C against VcoR-7: (a) pVco-5, (b) pVco-7, (c) pVco-14, and (d) pVco-C against VcoR-7. The p-value for each hour was confirmed to be <0.001, except when pVco-7 was compared to the control group; multiplicity of infection (MOI): 0.
Pathogens 09 00831 g002
Pathogens 09 00831 g003 550
Figure 3. Pacific oyster larvae infection prevention using various concentrations of: (a) pVco-5, (b) pVco-7, (c) pVco-14, and (d) pVco-C. All groups except for the pVco-7-treated group had p-values <0.001 when compared to the control group. Control-1 indicates the phage-treated group without VcoR-7 inoculation, and Control-2 indicates the VcoR-7 inoculated larvae group without phage treatment.
Figure 3. Pacific oyster larvae infection prevention using various concentrations of: (a) pVco-5, (b) pVco-7, (c) pVco-14, and (d) pVco-C. All groups except for the pVco-7-treated group had p-values <0.001 when compared to the control group. Control-1 indicates the phage-treated group without VcoR-7 inoculation, and Control-2 indicates the VcoR-7 inoculated larvae group without phage treatment.
Pathogens 09 00831 g003
Pathogens 09 00831 g004 550
Figure 4. Phages used in this study: (a) pVco-5, (b) pVco-7, and (c) pVco-14. Bar indicates 50 nm.
Figure 4. Phages used in this study: (a) pVco-5, (b) pVco-7, and (c) pVco-14. Bar indicates 50 nm.
Pathogens 09 00831 g004
Table
Table 1. Result of the antimicrobial susceptibility test of the pVco-7-resistant Vibrio coralliilyticus strain (VcoR-7).
Table 1. Result of the antimicrobial susceptibility test of the pVco-7-resistant Vibrio coralliilyticus strain (VcoR-7).
Antimicrobial AgentZone Diameter (mm)Interpretive CriteriaVcoR-7Antimicrobial AgentZone Diameter (mm)Interpretive CriteriaVcoR-7
S *I *R *Zone Diameter/Criteria SIRZone Diameter/Criteria
Ampicillin≥1714–16≤130/RImipenem≥2320–22≤1926/S
Amoxicillin-clavulanate≥1814–17≤1316/IMeropenem≥2320–22≤1918/R
Ampicillin-sulbactam≥1512–14≤1111/RAmikacin≥1715–16≤1415/I
Piperacillin≥2118–20≤170/RGentamicin≥1513–14≤1215/S
Piperacillin-tazobactam≥2118–20≤1720/ITetracycline≥1512–14≤1120/S
Cefepime≥2519–24≤1818/RCiprofloxacin≥2116–20≤1525/S
Cefotaxime≥2623–25≤2221/RLevofloxacin≥1714–16≤1325/S
Cefoxitin≥1815–17≤1414/ROfloxacin≥1613–15≤1222/S
Ceftazidime≥2118–20≤1715/RTrimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole≥1611–15≤1027/S
Cefuroxime sodium≥1815–17≤1419/S
* S: susceptible, I: intermediate, and R: resistant.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, H.J.; Jun, J.W.; Giri, S.S.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, S.W.; Kwon, J.; Lee, S.B.; Chi, C.; Park, S.C. Bacteriophage Cocktail for the Prevention of Multiple-Antibiotic-Resistant and Mono-Phage-Resistant Vibrio coralliilyticus Infection in Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) Larvae. Pathogens 2020, 9, 831. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100831

AMA Style

Kim HJ, Jun JW, Giri SS, Kim SG, Kim SW, Kwon J, Lee SB, Chi C, Park SC. Bacteriophage Cocktail for the Prevention of Multiple-Antibiotic-Resistant and Mono-Phage-Resistant Vibrio coralliilyticus Infection in Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) Larvae. Pathogens. 2020; 9(10):831. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100831

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Hyoun Joong, Jin Woo Jun, Sib Sankar Giri, Sang Guen Kim, Sang Wha Kim, Jun Kwon, Sung Bin Lee, Cheng Chi, and Se Chang Park. 2020. "Bacteriophage Cocktail for the Prevention of Multiple-Antibiotic-Resistant and Mono-Phage-Resistant Vibrio coralliilyticus Infection in Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) Larvae" Pathogens 9, no. 10: 831. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100831

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop