Next Article in Journal
Genetic and Pathogenic Variability of Mycogone perniciosa Isolates Causing Wet Bubble Disease on Agaricus bisporus in China
Previous Article in Journal
Proliferative Kidney Disease and Proliferative Darkening Syndrome are Linked with Brown Trout (Salmo trutta fario) Mortalities in the Pre-Alpine Isar River
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Variable Surface Glycoprotein from Trypanosoma brucei Undergoes Cleavage by Matrix Metalloproteinases: An in silico Approach

by
Cláudia Jassica Gonçalves Moreno
1,
Taffarel Torres
2 and
Marcelo Sousa Silva
1,3,4,*
1
Programa de Pós-graduação em Bioquímica, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59012-570, Brazil
2
Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde- Universidade Federal Rural de Semi-árido, Mossoró 59625-900, Brazil
3
Departamento de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59012-570, Brazil
4
Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1800-166 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2019, 8(4), 178; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8040178
Submission received: 30 July 2019 / Revised: 24 September 2019 / Accepted: 25 September 2019 / Published: 8 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Human Pathogens)

Abstract

:
In order to survive as extracellular parasites in the mammalian host environment, Trypanosoma brucei has developed efficient mechanisms of immune system evasion, which include the abundant expression of a variable surface glycoprotein (VSG) coat. VSGs are anchored in the parasite membrane by covalent C-terminal binding to glycosylphosphatidylinositol and may be periodically removed by a phospholipase C (PLC) and a major surface protein (TbMSP). VSG molecules show extraordinary antigenic diversity and a comparative analysis of protein sequences suggests that conserved elements may be a suitable target against African trypanosomiasis. However, the cleavage mechanisms of these molecules remain unclear. Moreover, in protozoan infections, including those caused by Trypanosoma brucei, it is possible to observe an increased expression of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). To address the cleavage mechanism of VSGs, the PROSPER server was used for the identification of VSG sequence cleavage sites. After data compilation, it was observed that 64 VSG consensus sequences showed a high conservation of hydrophobic residues, such as valine (V), methionine (M), leucine (L) and isoleucine (I) in the fifth position—the exact location of the cleavage site. In addition, the PROSPER server identified conserved cleavage site portions of VSG proteins recognized by three matrix metalloproteases (gelatinases: MMP-2, MMP-3 and MMP-9). However, further biological studies are needed in order to analyze and confirm this prediction.

1. Introduction

Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) or sleeping sickness is a vector-borne disease caused by two hemoflagellate parasites named Trypanosoma brucei gambiense and Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense [1]. Almost 60 million people are living in at risk areas in sub-Saharan Africa. There is no available vaccine and, therefore, rapid detection tests remain a priority for early treatment. Moreover, Trypanosoma brucei brucei parasites affect only animals—cattle and other ruminants [2]—causing important economic burden loss in endemic countries [3,4].
T. brucei have highly abundant variant surface glycoproteins (VSGs) expressed in the membrane, which provide numerous well-established functions on interaction with the mammalian host and even in the vector-tsetse flies’ life cycle [4]. VSG molecules from T. brucei are dimeric proteins that contain the same primary structure, composed of a combination of one N-terminal domain of approximately 340 residues and one or two C-terminal domains of 30 to 50 residues each. The C-terminal is attached to the plasma membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor [5,6].
Briefly, VSG is a protective coat that is periodically changed to allow parasite manipulation and escape from the immune system [7,8,9,10,11]. Soluble VSGs released by T. brucei are extremely immunogenic molecules that cause a poor immune system response and progression to chronic infection [8,12,13]. Recently revised, the pattern of release of VSG molecules from the trypanosome surface is achieved by T. brucei endogenous phospholipase C (PLC) and major surface protein families (TbMSP A-C) [14]. A detailed analysis provided evidence that TbMSP and PLC expression is coordinately and inversely regulated during the differentiation of T. brucei parasites [13]. The PLC is only present in metacyclic and bloodstream stages of the life cycle. Nevertheless, loss of T. brucei plasma membrane integrity leads to GPI-PLC-mediated VSG hydrolysis [15,16]. Nevertheless, no definitive function for GPI-PLC has been identified.
However, GPI-PLC does not act alone in the VSG release process. TbMSP also participates in this VSG release mechanism during the antigenic variation mechanisms in T. brucei. TbMSP has homology with the major surface promastigote proteins from Leishmania species—etiological agents of leishmaniasis [17,18]. TbMSP is known to be a cell membrane-localized zinc metalloprotease expressed primarily in the process of the differentiation of the bloodstream form to the procyclic form of T. brucei. The TbMSP-B−/−PLC−/− double mutant T. brucei line failed to differentiate into the procyclic form, with most VSGs remaining in the cell surface, unlike the single mutant protein. Thus, both TbMSP and PLC participate in the removal of the VSG coat during the differentiation of the bloodstream stage into procyclic trypanosomes [18]. Nevertheless, the dynamics of VSG coat replacement at the protein level remains unclear.
TbMSP is a zinc-dependent class of protein that shares similarities with the metzincins protein class, also known as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [17,19,20]. It is believed that during infection by T. brucei, this protein could take part in extracellular matrix degradation, localization at the cell surface and proteolytic zinc-dependent activity [21,22,23,24]. Furthermore, the hydrolytic activities of TbMSP on proteins such as gelatin, casein, and matrix proteins such as collagen have been demonstrated [25]. Many studies showed an increased expression of MMP proteins during infection caused by trypanosomatids [26,27]. In addition, specific MMP inhibitors have been used to eliminate parasites as well as potential antiparasitic drugs [24,26,27,28].
In this work, we have investigated the relationship between MMP and VSG proteins due to the similarity of the proteolytic function of both MSPs and MMPs. Several VSG sequences have been deposited in the databank, as a result of extensively examined mechanisms regulating VSG gene diversification and expression [29,30]. VSG molecular organization resulted from a complex molecular process that involved many transcription processes and recombination to promote antigenic variation [31,32]. There are two domains of VSG proteins, a-VSG and b-VSG, that showed an evolutionary association, but with differences in the number and position of the conserved cysteine residue [33,34]. However, the a-VSG domain proved to be more diverse than the b-VSG domain [35].
Here, the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) databank was used to access and obtain the VSG sequences. All VSG sequences were submitted in the PROSPER server for the identification of possible endogenous cleavage sites and proteins that recognize these sequences.

2. Results

We deposited available VSG sequences from all subspecies present in the NCBI databank into the PROSPER server: T. b. brucei—Tbb (n = 236); T. b. rhodesiense—Tbr (n = 15) and T. b. gambiense—Tbg (n = 68). Overall, the analysis showed cleavage sites recognized for matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in all subspecies sequences and that they include the two VSG domains, A and B. After the sequence compilation, 46 consensus sequences (Table 1 and Table 2) were carried out. A high conservation of hydrophobic residues (black letters) was observed, such as valine (V), methionine (M), leucine (L) and isoleucine (I), specifically in the fifth position—the exact location of the cleavage site. Additionally, in Table 1, a high frequency of polar neutral residues can be observed next to the fifth position (green letters). The sequences were recognized in the first 100 amino acids conserved in ascending order by MMP9 > MMP3 > MMP2 (Table 1 and Table 2).

3. Discussion

This study underlines the importance of the in silico prediction of cleavage sites in all sequence regions of VSG molecules by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). The PROSPER server identified that all sequences have a conserved portion and specific amino acid cleavage site positions. Therefore, the activity of endogenous proteases would appear to be significant, essentially during microorganism infection. Previous studies, using a comparative analysis of different VSG sequences, suggest that a conserved element in this molecule could be an important target for an intervention strategy against African trypanosomiasis [6,10,36,37,38].
It has been demonstrated by Cross that the VSG coat could be uniformly removed from the cells by proteases, such as trypsin or pronase, without causing any changes in parasite morphology [39]. Consequently, maybe proteolytic activity could play a role in the mechanism of protein surface replacement during T. brucei infection. However, LaCount and colleagues described three classes of conserved families of zinc metalloproteases (TbMSP-A, -B and -C) present on T. brucei as responsible for the release of ectopically expressed VSG molecules from the surface of procyclic trypanosomes [8,17]. All of these three families of proteins are expressed in bloodstream-stage trypanosomes, but only TbMSP-B is found in the procyclic stage. The sequences of the three TbMSP share approximately 33% identity, and the main difference is in their terminals. The TbMSP-A has an extended C-terminal region, rich in serine and glutamate amino acid residues, which was not seen in the other two, and finishes in a short hydrophobic segment. TbMSP-B has a hydrophobic tail in the C-terminal. TbMSP-C has a C-terminal region that is highly hydrophilic and rich in charged amino acids and proline, which indicates that it is not linked to a membrane via a GPI anchor, unlike TbMSP-A and -B [17]. Moreover, the hydrolysis of PLC results in the conversion of the hydrophobic membrane form of VSG (mfVSG) to a water-soluble VSG (sVSG), resulting in the shedding of the VSG from the parasite membrane [40].
We observed hydrophobic sites on VSGs as substrates for, at the least, one matrix metalloproteinase, MMP-9 protein. Due to the higher number of recognized portions in all T. brucei subspecies sequences, matrix metalloproteinase proteins maybe able to release the VSG coat from the surface of the parasite. Additionally, VSGs molecules are available for interaction with other molecules besides MSPs and PL-C [19]. Our speculation is that MMPs may use VSG molecules as substrates in parasite–host interactions during T. brucei infection.
In physiological processes, MMPs regulate the release or activation of chemokines, cytokines, growth factors, and other bioactive molecules [24]. Since VSGs are antigenically distinct, the conserved structure is probably necessary for their function. It is possible that the high numbers of protease cleavage sites identified by the PROSPER server may be important for VSG release and antigenic variation during infection by T. brucei. Thus, the protein-conserved positions identified in cleavage sites might have a significant function and are accessible for surface cleavage by MMPs in different sizes.
Some questions remain unanswered. Can MPPs directly cleave VSGs to provide the release mechanism of VSG coats during the phenomenon of antigenic variation? Does increasing MPP expression during T. brucei infection represent an escape mechanism of the parasite or host protection?
To answer these questions, the data predicted by the PROSPER server was associated with the interaction between the parasite and mammalian host, described so far. Based on several studies, MMPs represent a large family of secreted or membrane-bound endopeptidases, important in many physiological and pathological conditions, including cancer and protozoan parasitic diseases [24,41]. MMPs play a crucial role in leukocyte penetration in brain diseases [39]. Consistently, mice infected with T. brucei have a high expression of MMP-3 and MMP-12 at the mRNA level, followed by significant parasitemia increases [24,28]. Apparently VSG proteins from T. b. brucei have many conserved sequences, including both domains A and B, that have undergone cleavage by MMPs (Table 1 and Table 2) and our results showed a significant number of cleavage sites recognized by MMP-3.
Besides, in the human infection context, some patients in the second stage of HAT (the neurological stage) present an increase in the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9, correlated with the presence of parasites and leukocytes [20,24,42]. We could verify that MMP-2 and MMP-9 recognize several cleave sites of VSG domain A and B, present in T. b. gambiense and T. b. rhodesiense subspecies sequences. According to this finding, we believe that MMPs could be involved in VSG switch mechanisms and the release of soluble VSGs during infection caused by T. brucei. These data, together with the study model previously proposed by Moreno et al. [14], suggest that the mechanism of release of VSG in T. brucei may occur through the combination of host metalloproteinases and the intrinsic mechanisms of the parasite mediated by MSP and PLC enzymes.
Therefore, studies have shown that MMP inhibitors like antibiotics, such as tetracycline and minocycline, prolong the animal’s survival and decrease the influx of parasites and leukocytes in the brain [20,27,28]. Our recent studies focus on the evaluation of potential new drugs in the context of trypanosomatid infections. Thus, the mechanism of the antigenic variation of T. brucei seems to be an interesting target for the search for potential new antiparasitic molecules [43,44]. Consequently, understanding the mechanism of VSG release and all the involved molecules represents an important strategy for the development of new drugs against infections caused by T. brucei. In addition, a detailed analysis of all identified VSG conserved residues may provide new insights into host–parasite interactions, taking into account that released soluble VSGs interact directly with the immune system. Nevertheless, more studies are needed to validate these cleavage sites by MMPs.

4. Materials and Methods

The conserved domains for VSG sequences were retrieved from the Conserved Domain Database of the NCBI [45]. All T. brucei sequences were recovered from the NCBI protein database, then those sequences were divided considering the three subspecies: T. b. brucei (Tbb), T. b. gambiense (Tbg) and T. b. rhodesiense (Tbr). Data were sourced using the Reverse Position-Specific BLAST (RPS BLAST) tool v2.6.0 [46]. During the search, the NCBI CDD accessions cl03014 (a-VSG) and cl26244 (b-VSG) were used. In addition, the fragmented domains were discarded, and the minimum e-value threshold was 1.0 x 10−5.
The sequences that contain VSG domains were submitted to the PROSPER server to predict protease cleavage sites [46]. As an exclusivity criterion, the cleavage sites with a score greater than 0.8 were considered as probable sites for MMPs/MSPs. To demonstrate that the MMP/MSP sites present in T. brucei are very conserved, the standard sites for these proteases were retrieved from the MEROPS database [47] (Supplementary Materials Figures S1–S3). The cleavage sites were searched in all extensions of the protein sequence. To illustrate the similarity of the cleave sites, an analysis in the WebLogo tool was performed [48]. Our approach can be summarized as follows in Figure 1.

5. Conclusions

The antigenic variation mechanism is a sophisticated phenomenon that contributes to chronicity in the context of infections caused by T. brucei. Trypanosomes manipulate their hosts by VSG switch mechanisms as a strategy to successfully elude the immune system. However, here, using VSG sequence analysis, the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) were able to recognize several VSG sequences from different subspecies of T. brucei.
The interest in MMPs resulted from the observation that, besides their housekeeping role, they are involved in a wide range of physiological and pathological phenomena, including protozoa infections. Likewise, the VSG shedding mechanism by parasite protease is not fully understood. Therefore, we intended to analyze and identify VSG cleavage sites against protease present in the PROSPER server. Our study demonstrated that all the VSG sequences analyzed present conserved cleavage sites, which could be substrates for MMPs, such as MMP- 2, MMP-3 and MMP-9.
T. brucei present thousands of surface VSGs that could hypothetically interact with MMPs. Thus, the mammalian host may contribute in the infection dynamics through the overexpression of MMPs. Nevertheless, more biological studies are required to determine the functions of MMPs in the context of T. brucei infection.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/8/4/178/s1, List S1: Used sequences (a few of sequences were used two times because were found in more than one subspecies of Trypanosoma brucei), Figure S1: Cleavege sites for matrix metallopeptidase-2 retrieved from MEROPS database, Figure S2: Cleavage sites for matrix metallopeptidase-9 retrieved from MEROPS database, Figure S3: Cleavage sites for matrix metallopeptidase-3 retrieved from MEROPS database.

Author Contributions

All authors participated actively in the writing and discussion of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by GHTM-UID/multi/04413/2013 (FCT-Portugal), grant number 019/2013 (Capes-Brazil).

Acknowledgments

C.J.G.M. thanks Capes/Brazil for the financial support provided through postgraduate scholarships. M.S.S. thanks Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Lisbon-Portugal (GHTM-UID/multi/04413/2013) and the Programa Ciências Sem Fronteiras, Capes–Brazil (Grant number 019/2013). We are grateful to Paulo Fanado for editing this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

HATHuman African Trypanosomiasis
VSGVariable surface protein
MSPMajor surface protein
PLCPhospholipase C
MMPsMatrix metalloproteinases

References

  1. Kennedy, P.G. Clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness). Lancet Neurol. 2013, 12, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mitra, A.; Mawson, A. Neglected Tropical Diseases: Epidemiology and Global Burden. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2017, 2, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rotureau, B.; Van Den Abbeele, J. Through the dark continent: African trypanosome development in the tsetse fly. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ponte-Sucre, A. An overview of trypanosoma brucei infections: An intense host-parasite interaction. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Carrington, M.; Miller, N.; Blum, M.; Roditi, I.; Wiley, D.; Turner, M. Variant specific glycoprotein of Trypanosoma brucei consists of two domains each having an independently conserved pattern of cysteine residues. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 221, 823–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Reinitz, D.M.; Aizenstein, B.D.; Mansfield, J.M. Variable and conserved structural elements of trypanosome variant surface glycoproteins. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1992, 51, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vincendeau, P.; Bouteille, B. Immunology and immunopathology of African trypanosomiasis. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 2006, 78, 645–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Gruszynski, A.E.; DeMaster, A.; Hooper, N.M.; Bangs, J.D. Surface Coat Remodeling during Differentiation of Trypanosoma brucei. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 24665–24672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Donelson, J.E.; Hill, K.L.; El-Sayed, N.M. Multiple mechanisms of immune evasion by African trypanosomes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1998, 91, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Horn, D. Antigenic variation in African trypanosomes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2014, 195, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Pinger, J.; Chowdhury, S.; Papavasiliou, F.N. Variant surface glycoprotein density defines an immune evasion threshold for African trypanosomes undergoing antigenic variation. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. De Almeida, M.L.C.; Turner, M.J. The membrane form of variant surface glycoproteins of Trypanosoma brucei. Nature 1983, 302, 349–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gruszynski, A.E.; van Deursen, F.J.; Albareda, M.C.; Best, A.; Chaudhary, K.; Cliffe, L.J.; del Rio, L.; Dunn, J.D.; Ellis, L.; Evans, K.J.; et al. Regulation of surface coat exchange by differentiating African trypanosomes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2006, 147, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Moreno, C.J.G.; Temporão, A.; Torres, T.; Silva, M.S. Trypanosoma brucei interaction with host: Mechanism of VSG release as target for drug discovery for african trypanosomiasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sunter, J.; Webb, H.; Carrington, M. Determinants of GPI-PLC Localisation to the Flagellum and Access to GPI-Anchored Substrates in Trypanosomes. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Webb, H.; Carnall, N.; Vanhamme, L.; Rolin, S.; Van Den Abbeele, J.; Welburn, S.; Pays, E.; Carrington, M. The GPI-phospholipase C of Trypanosoma brucei is non essential but influences parasitemia in mice. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 139, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. LaCount, D.J.; Gruszynski, A.E.; Grandgenett, P.M.; Bangs, J.D.; Donelson, J.E. Expression and Function of the Trypanosoma brucei Major Surface Protease (GP63) Genes. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 24658–24664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Grandgenett, P.M.; Otsu, K.; Wilson, H.R.; Wilson, M.E.; Donelson, J.E. A function for a specific zinc metalloprotease of African trypanosomes. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3, 1432–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bossard, G.; Cuny, G.; Geiger, A. Secreted proteases of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense: Possible targets for sleeping sickness control? BioFactors 2013, 39, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mogk, S.; Meiwes, A.; Shtopel, S.; Schraermeyer, U.; Lazarus, M.; Kubata, B.; Wolburg, H.; Duszenko, M. Cyclical appearance of African trypanosomes in the cerebrospinal fluid: New insights in how trypanosomes enter the CNS. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rosenberg, G.A. Matrix metalloproteinases and their multiple roles in neurodegenerative diseases. Lancet Neurol. 2009, 8, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Medeiros, N.I.; Gomes, J.A.S.; Correa-Oliveira, R. Synergic and antagonistic relationship between MMP-2 and MMP-9 with fibrosis and inflammation in Chagas’ cardiomyopathy. Parasite Immunol. 2017, 39, e12446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. McGwire, B.S.; Chang, K.P.; Engman, D.M. Migration through the extracellular matrix by the parasitic protozoan Leishmania is enhanced by surface metalloprotease gp63. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 1008–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Geurts, N.; Opdenakker, G.; Van Den Steen, P.E. Matrix metalloproteinases as therapeutic targets in protozoan parasitic infections. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 133, 257–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. De Sousa, K.P.; Atouguia, J.; Silva, M.S. Partial biochemical characterization of a Metalloproteinase from the bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei brucei parasites. Protein J. 2010, 29, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Khare, S.; Nagle, A.S.; Biggart, A.; Lai, Y.H.; Liang, F.; Davis, L.C.; Barnes, S.W.; Mathison, C.J.; Myburgh, E.; Gao, M.Y.; et al. Proteasome inhibition for treatment of leishmaniasis, Chagas disease and sleeping sickness. Nature 2016, 537, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Olivera, G.C.; Ren, X.; Vodnala, S.K.; Lu, J.; Coppo, L.; Leepiyasakulchai, C.; Holmgren, A.; Kristensson, K.; Rottenberg, M.E. Nitric Oxide Protects against Infection-Induced Neuroinflammation by Preserving the Stability of the Blood-Brain Barrier. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Masocha, W.; Rottenberg, M.E. Minocycline impedes African trypanosome invasion of the brain in a murine model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1798–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hutchinson, O.C.; Picozzi, K.; Jones, N.G.; Mott, H.; Sharma, R.; Welburn, S.C.; Carrington, M. Variant Surface Glycoprotein gene repertoires in Trypanosoma brucei have diverged to become strain-specific. BMC Genom. 2007, 8, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Diffley, P. Trypanosoma brucei: Immunogenicity of the variant surface coat glycoprotein of virulent and avirulent subspecies. Exp. Parasitol. 1985, 59, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Matthews, K.R.; McCulloch, R.; Morrison, L.J. The within-host dynamics of AFrican trypanosome infections. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 20140288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jayaraman, S.; Harris, C.; Paxton, E.; Donachie, A.M.; Vaikkinen, H.; McCulloch, R.; Hall, J.P.; Kenny, J.; Lenzi, L.; Hertz-Fowler, C.; et al. Application of long read sequencing to determine expressed antigen diversity in Trypanosoma brucei infections. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jackson, A.P.; Berry, A.; Aslett, M.; Allison, H.C.; Burton, P.; Vavrova-Anderson, J.; Brown, R.; Browne, H.; Corton, N.; Hauser, H.; et al. Antigenic diversity is generated by distinct evolutionary mechanisms in African trypanosome species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 3416–3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Bartossek, T.; Jones, N.G.; Schafer, C.; Cvitkovic, M.; Glogger, M.; Mott, H.R.; Kuper, J.; Brennich, M.; Carrington, M.; Smith, A.S.; et al. Structural basis for the shielding function of the dynamic trypanosome variant surfasse glycoprotein coat. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 1523–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cross, G.A.M.; Kim, H.S.; Wickstead, B. Capturing the variant surfasse glycoprotein repertoire (the VSGnome) of Trypanosoma brucei Lister 427. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2014, 195, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Smith, T.K.; Vasileva, N.; Gluenz, E.; Terry, S.; Portman, N.; Kramer, S.; Carrington, M.; Michaeli, S.; Gull, K.; Rudenko, G. Blocking variant surface glycoprotein synthesis in Trypanosoma brucei triggers a general arrest in translation initiation. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gjini, E.; Haydon, D.T.; Barry, J.D.; Cobbold, C.A. Critical Interplay between Parasite Differentiation, Host Immunity, and Antigenic Variation in Trypanosome Infections. Am. Nat. 2010, 176, 424–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Luscher, A.; de Koning, H.; Maser, P. Chemotherapeutic Strategies Against Trypanosoma brucei: Drug Targets vs. Drug Targeting. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2007, 13, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cross, G.A. Identification, purification and properties of clone-specific glycoprotein antigens constituting the surface coat of Trypanosoma brucei. Parasitology 1975, 71, 393–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ferguson, M.A.; Low, M.G.; Cross, G.A. Glycosyl-sn-1,2-dimyristylphosphatidylinositol is covalently linked to Trypanosoma brucei variant surface glycoprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 14547–14555. [Google Scholar]
  41. Agrawal, S.M.; Lau, L.; Yong, V.W. MMPs in the central nervous system: Where the good guys go bad. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2008, 19, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mogk, S.; Boßelmann, C.M.; Mudogo, C.N.; Stein, J.; Wolburg, H.; Duszenko, M. African trypanosomes and brain infection—The unsolved question. Biol. Rev. 2017, 92, 1675–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Parente, A.; Daniele-Silva, A.; Furtado, A.; Melo, M.; Lacerda, A.; Queiroz, M.; Moreno, C.; Santos, E.; Rocha, H.; Barbosa, E.; et al. Analogs of the Scorpion Venom Peptide Stigmurin: Structural Assessment, Toxicity, and Increased Antimicrobial Activity. Toxins 2018, 10, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Amorim-Carmo, B.; Daniele-Silva, A.; Parente, A.; Furtado, A.A.; Carvalho, E.; Oliveira, J.W.; Santos, E.C.; Silva, M.S.; Silva, S.R.; Silva-Júnior, A.A.; et al. Potent and Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Activity of Analogs from the Scorpion Peptide Stigmurin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Gonzales, N.R.; Lu, S.; Chitsaz, F.; Geer, L.Y.; Geer, R.C.; He, J.; Gwadz, M.; Hurwitz, D.I.; et al. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D222–D226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Song, J.; Tan, H.; Perry, A.J.; Akutsu, T.; Webb, G.I.; Whisstock, J.C.; Pike, R.N. PROSPER: An Integrated Feature-Based Tool for Predicting Protease Substrate Cleavage Sites. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e503000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rawlings, N.D.; Barrett, A.J.; Thomas, P.D.; Huang, X.; Bateman, A.; Finn, R.D. The MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors in 2017 and a comparison with peptidases in the PANTHER database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D624–D632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Crooks, G.E.; Hon, G.; Chandonia, J.M.; Brenner, S.E. WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1188–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Methodologies overview: VSG domains A and B were analyzed by RPS BLAST after the VSG sequences were submitted to the PROSPER server to identify the cleavage sites. As a result, the protease cleavage sites were analyzed using the WebLogo tool to generate a consensus sequence.
Figure 1. Methodologies overview: VSG domains A and B were analyzed by RPS BLAST after the VSG sequences were submitted to the PROSPER server to identify the cleavage sites. As a result, the protease cleavage sites were analyzed using the WebLogo tool to generate a consensus sequence.
Pathogens 08 00178 g001
Table 1. Variable surface glycoprotein (VSG) domain A cleavage sites from Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense (Tbr), Trypanosoma brucei gambiense (Tbg), and Trypanosoma brucei brucei (Tbb). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP).
Table 1. Variable surface glycoprotein (VSG) domain A cleavage sites from Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense (Tbr), Trypanosoma brucei gambiense (Tbg), and Trypanosoma brucei brucei (Tbb). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP).
VSG Domain A (NCBI CDD * Accession: cl03014)Number of MMP Cleavage Sites MMP Cleavage Site Consensus Sequences Portion (WebLogo)
Tbb (85 sequences)MMP2309 Pathogens 08 00178 i001
MMP3372 Pathogens 08 00178 i002
MMP91673 Pathogens 08 00178 i003
Tbr (5 sequences)MMP217 Pathogens 08 00178 i004
MMP321 Pathogens 08 00178 i005
MMP998 Pathogens 08 00178 i006
Tbg (22 sequences)MMP258 Pathogens 08 00178 i007
MMP362 Pathogens 08 00178 i008
MMP9333 Pathogens 08 00178 i009
* CDD: Conserved Domain Database.
Table 2. Variable surface glycoprotein (VSG) domain B: cleavage sites from Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense (Tbr), Trypanosoma brucei gambiense (Tbg), and Trypanosoma brucei brucei (Tbb).
Table 2. Variable surface glycoprotein (VSG) domain B: cleavage sites from Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense (Tbr), Trypanosoma brucei gambiense (Tbg), and Trypanosoma brucei brucei (Tbb).
VSG Domain B (NCBI CDD Accession: cl26244)Number of MMP Cleavage Sites MMP Cleavage Site Consensus Sequences (WebLogo)
Tbb (151 sequences)MMP2454 Pathogens 08 00178 i010
MMP3593 Pathogens 08 00178 i011
MMP92983 Pathogens 08 00178 i012
Tbr (10 sequences)MMP217 Pathogens 08 00178 i013
MMP321 Pathogens 08 00178 i014
MMP998 Pathogens 08 00178 i015
Tbg (49 sequences)MMP2145 Pathogens 08 00178 i016
MMP3176 Pathogens 08 00178 i017
MMP9949 Pathogens 08 00178 i018

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moreno, C.J.G.; Torres, T.; Silva, M.S. Variable Surface Glycoprotein from Trypanosoma brucei Undergoes Cleavage by Matrix Metalloproteinases: An in silico Approach. Pathogens 2019, 8, 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8040178

AMA Style

Moreno CJG, Torres T, Silva MS. Variable Surface Glycoprotein from Trypanosoma brucei Undergoes Cleavage by Matrix Metalloproteinases: An in silico Approach. Pathogens. 2019; 8(4):178. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8040178

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moreno, Cláudia Jassica Gonçalves, Taffarel Torres, and Marcelo Sousa Silva. 2019. "Variable Surface Glycoprotein from Trypanosoma brucei Undergoes Cleavage by Matrix Metalloproteinases: An in silico Approach" Pathogens 8, no. 4: 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8040178

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop