Bacteriophage-Based Therapeutics for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections: From Biological Barriers to Translational Strategies
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Major Bacterial STI Pathogens: Epidemiology, Treatment Limitations and Antimicrobial Resistance
2.1. Chlamydia trachomatis
2.2. Neisseria gonorrhoeae
2.3. Mycoplasma genitalium
2.4. Treponema pallidum
2.5. Bacterial Vaginosis and Gardnerella-Associated Biofilms
| Pathogen | Burden | Key Clinical Features | AMR Status | Main Resistance Mechanisms | Dominant Biological Constraint | Major Treatment Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlamydia trachomatis | 127–128 M/year [2] | Often asymptomatic; may lead to PID and infertility [7,18,25] | Low (rare documented resistance) [19,20,23] | Putative mutations in 23S rRNA, rplD, gyrA/parC [6,20,23] | Obligate intracellular [6] | Limited resistance surveillance; persistence and reinfection [7,19,20] |
| Neisseria gonorrhoeae | ~87 M/year [2] | Urethritis, cervicitis, PID; often asymptomatic in women [7,29] | High (increasing) [3,4,28,29] | Mosaic penA alleles; mtrR-mediated efflux [3,29] | High genetic plasticity and antigenic variation [28] | MDR/XDR strains; narrowing treatment options [27,28] |
| Mycoplasma genitalium | ~1–3% in general population; higher in high-risk groups [34,36] | Persistent urethritis and cervicitis [33,34] | Very high [35,37,38,39] | 23S rRNA mutations (A2058G/A2059G); parC mutations [37,38,39,42] | Absence of cell wall [33] | Limited therapeutic options; high resistance burden [35,37,38,39] |
| Treponema pallidum | 6–7 M/year [2] | Multistage systemic infection; congenital infection [44,46] | Low overall; macrolide resistance present [8,48] | 23S rRNA mutations (A2058G, A2059G) [8,48] | Non-cultivable/experimentally intractable [47] | Reliance on penicillin; limited alternatives [7,43] |
| Bacterial vaginosis (Gardnerella-associated) | 23–29% [51,53] | Vaginal discharge; high recurrence [62,65] | Functional tolerance (biofilm-associated) [61,62,63] | Polymicrobial biofilm formation; sialidase activity [55,58,60] | Structured polymicrobial biofilm adherent to vaginal epithelium [54,55,56] | High recurrence despite therapy; frequently associated with biofilm persistence and microbiome instability [62,64,65,66,67,68,69] |
3. Phage-Based and Phage-Derived Antimicrobial Strategies
3.1. Lytic Bacteriophages
3.2. Endolysins and Lysin-Based Systems
3.3. Depolymerases and Antibiofilm Enzymes
3.4. Phage Display and Targeting Technologies
3.5. Engineered Phage Systems and CRISPR-Cas Platforms
4. Biological Constraints That Determine the Feasibility of Phage-Based Therapeutics
4.1. Intracellular Sequestration in Chlamydia trachomatis: When Access Becomes the Primary Barrier
4.2. Structural Incompatibility in Mycoplasma genitalium: When the Canonical Enzymatic Target Is Absent
4.3. Outer Membrane Exclusion and Receptor Instability in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Dual-Interface Barrier
4.4. Treponema pallidum: Biological Plausibility Under Conditions of Experimental Inaccessibility
4.5. Biofilm-Associated Bacterial Vaginosis: When the Barrier Becomes the Therapeutic Target
| Target Organism | Phage-Related Strategy | Experimental System | Key Findings | Dominant Constraint | Evidence Level | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gardnerella spp. | Engineered endolysin PM-477 | Ex vivo vaginal biofilms; in vitro single- and dual-species biofilms | Selective elimination of Gardnerella spp. with preservation of lactobacilli; disruption of BV-associated biofilms | Biofilm (accessible extracellular target) | Experimental (preclinical) | [101,125] |
| BV-associated polymicrobial biofilms | Phage-derived antibiofilm enzymes (endolysins, depolymerases) | In vitro and ex vivo biofilm models | Enzymatic disruption of extracellular matrix and enhanced biofilm clearance; however, polymicrobial structure and recurrence remain key challenges | Biofilm matrix (extracellular accessibility) | Experimental (preclinical) | [72,73,74,102,103,128,129] |
| Chlamydia trachomatis | Phage display-derived targeting ligands; engineered delivery systems | Conceptual/platform-level rationale based on intracellular infection biology and mucosal delivery constraints | Intracellular localisation likely limits classical phage therapy; delivery-oriented strategies may be more compatible, but no pathogen-specific therapeutic platform has been experimentally validated | Intracellular localisation | Conceptual | [6,75,104,105,106,111,112] |
| Neisseria gonorrhoeae | Filamentous bacteriophage NgoΦ6; gonococcal phage/prophage-based systems | Genomic and experimental studies | Evidence of phage–host interaction supports biological plausibility; however, no validated therapeutic application has been demonstrated, and receptor variability may limit targeting stability | Outer membrane barrier and receptor variability | Indirect (preclinical) | [32,130] |
| Mycoplasma genitalium | Phage display-derived targeting ligands; non-lytic delivery-oriented systems | Conceptual/platform-level rationale based on wall-less cell biology and surface-targeting strategies | Absence of peptidoglycan renders lysin-based approaches mechanistically incompatible; alternative targeting strategies are conceptually plausible but remain unvalidated | Lack of peptidoglycan | Conceptual | [33,34,75,104,105,106] |
| Treponema pallidum | Not established; inferred from recent cultivation and genetic tools | In vitro cultivation and early genetic engineering studies | No bacteriophage has been identified and therapeutic feasibility remains untested despite recent advances in cultivation and genetic manipulation | Experimental inaccessibility | Unknown/low evidence | [123,124] |
5. Discussion: Translational Outlook and Clinical Challenges
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AMR | Antimicrobial resistance |
| STI | Sexually transmitted infection |
| STIs | Sexually transmitted infections |
| BV | Bacterial vaginosis |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
| CDC | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
| C. trachomatis | Chlamydia trachomatis |
| N. gonorrhoeae | Neisseria gonorrhoeae |
| M. genitalium | Mycoplasma genitalium |
| T. pallidum | Treponema pallidum |
| CRISPR | Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats |
| Cas | CRISPR-associated proteins |
| DNA | Deoxyribonucleic acid |
| RNA | Ribonucleic acid |
| PM-477 | Engineered endolysin targeting Gardnerella spp. |
References
- Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs). Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sexually-transmitted-infections-(stis) (accessed on 15 March 2026).
- Rowley, J.; Vander Hoorn, S.; Korenromp, E.; Low, N.; Unemo, M.; Abu-Raddad, L.J.; Chico, R.M.; Smolak, A.; Newman, L.; Gottlieb, S.; et al. Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: Global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull. World Health Organ. 2019, 97, 548–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Unemo, M.; Shafer, W.M. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the 21st century: Past, evolution, and future. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 587–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wi, T.; Lahra, M.M.; Ndowa, F.; Bala, M.; Dillon, J.R.; Ramon-Pardo, P.; Eremin, S.R.; Bolan, G.; Unemo, M. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Global surveillance and a call for international collaborative action. PLoS Med. 2017, 14, e1002344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Jensen, J.S.; Bradshaw, C. Management of Mycoplasma genitalium infections: Can we hit a moving target? BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Elwell, C.; Mirrashidi, K.; Engel, J. Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 385–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Workowski, K.A.; Bachmann, L.H.; Chan, P.A.; Johnston, C.M.; Muzny, C.A.; Park, I.; Reno, H.; Zenilman, J.M.; Bolan, G.A. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2021, 70, 1–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Stamm, L.V. Global challenge of antibiotic-resistant Treponema pallidum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines. 2021. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/chlamydia.htm (accessed on 15 March 2026).
- Cater, K.; Międzybrodzki, R.; Morozova, V.; Letkiewicz, S.; Łusiak-Szelachowska, M.; Rękas, J.; Weber-Dąbrowska, B.; Górski, A. Potential for phages in the treatment of bacterial sexually transmitted infections. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abedon, S.T.; García, P.; Mullany, P.; Aminov, R. Phage therapy: Past, present and future. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kortright, K.E.; Chan, B.K.; Koff, J.L.; Turner, P.E. Phage therapy: A renewed approach to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 25, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chan, B.K.; Abedon, S.T.; Loc-Carrillo, C. Phage cocktails and the future of phage therapy. Future Microbiol. 2013, 8, 769–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zalewska-Piątek, B. Phage therapy: Challenges, opportunities and future prospects. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gill, D.S.; Ram, S.; Rice, P.A. Biologic drug development for treatment and prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2025, 38, e00107-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Peng, H.; Chen, I.A.; Qimron, U. Engineering Phages to Fight Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Chem. Rev. 2025, 125, 933–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- World Health Organization. Global Health Sector Strategies on HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections for the Period 2022–2030; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Peipert, J.F. Genital chlamydial infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 2424–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, S.A.; Papp, J.R.; Stamm, W.E.; Peeling, R.W.; Martin, D.H.; Holmes, K.K. Evaluation of antimicrobial resistance and treatment failures for Chlamydia trachomatis: A meeting report. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 191, 917–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ljubin-Sternak, S.; Meštrović, T. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Chlamydia trachomatis: The current state of evidence and a call for more national surveillance studies. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 4322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sharma, V.; Khan, M.M. Current progress and future perspective of Chlamydia trachomatis infection: A rising threat to women health. Curr. Microbiol. 2025, 82, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Suzuki, S.; Hoshi, S.I.; Sagara, Y.; Sekizawa, A.; Kinoshita, K.; Kitamura, T. Antimicrobial resistance for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection during pregnancy in Japan. Infect. Chemother. 2022, 54, 173–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Villa, L.; Boga, J.A.; Otero, L.; Vazquez, F.; Milagro, A.; Salmerón, P.; Vall-Mayans, M.; Maciá, M.D.; Bernal, S.; Piñeiro, L. Phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chlamydia trachomatis isolates. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yang, C.; Saka, H.A. Editorial: Chlamydia-host interaction and its pathogenic mechanism. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1372714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bébéar, C.; de Barbeyrac, B. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pitt, R.; Alexander, S.; Ison, C.; Horner, P.; Hathorn, E.; Goold, P.; Woodford, N.; Cole, M.J. Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chlamydia trachomatis isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gonorrhoea. Annual Epidemiological Report for 2023. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/gonorrhoea-annual-epidemiological-report-2023 (accessed on 15 March 2026).
- Unemo, M.; Lahra, M.M.; Cole, M.J.; Marcano Zamora, D.; Jacobsson, S.; Galarza, P.; Martin, I.; Kreisel, K.M.; Galas, M.; Bertagnolio, S.; et al. WHO global gonococcal antimicrobial surveillance programmes, 2019-2022: A retrospective observational study. Lancet Microbe 2025, 6, 101181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Unemo, M.; Del Rio, C.; Shafer, W.M. Antimicrobial resistance expressed by Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A major global public health problem in the 21st century. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, EI10-0009-2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Eyre, D.W.; Town, K.; Street, T.; Barker, L.; Sanderson, N.; Cole, M.J.; Mohammed, H.; Pitt, R.; Gobin, M.; Irish, C.; et al. Detection in the United Kingdom of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae FC428 clone with ceftriaxone resistance. Euro Surveill. 2019, 24, 1900147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Edwards, J.L.; Apicella, M.A. Molecular mechanisms of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 965–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Adamczyk-Popławska, M.; Golec, P.; Piekarowicz, A.; Kwiatek, A. Bacteriophages in gonorrhea control. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2024, 50, 769–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Taylor-Robinson, D.; Jensen, J.S. Mycoplasma genitalium: From chrysalis to multicolored butterfly. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 498–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jensen, J.S.; Cusini, M.; Gomberg, M.; Moi, H. 2016 European guideline on Mycoplasma genitalium infections. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2016, 30, 1650–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wood, G.E.; Bradshaw, C.S.; Manhart, L.E. Update in epidemiology and management of Mycoplasma genitalium infections. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2023, 37, 311–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Baumann, L.; Cina, M.; Egli-Gany, D.; Goutaki, M.; Halbeisen, F.S.; Lohrer, G.R.; Ali, H.; Scott, P.; Low, N. Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in different population groups: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2018, 94, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Machalek, D.A.; Tao, Y.; Shilling, H.; Jensen, J.S.; Unemo, M.; Murray, G.; Chow, E.P.F.; Low, N.; Garland, S.M.; Vodstrcil, L.A.; et al. Prevalence of resistance-associated mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 1302–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Jensen, J.S.; Unemo, M. Antimicrobial treatment and resistance in sexually transmitted bacterial infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2024, 22, 435–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chua, T.P.; Vodstrcil, L.A.; Murray, G.L.; Plummer, E.L.; Jensen, J.S.; Unemo, M.; Chow, E.P.F.; Low, N.; Whiley, D.M.; Sweeney, E.L.; et al. Evolving patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium. Lancet Microbe 2025, 6, 101047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Philipova, I.; Mademova, M.; Birindjieva, E.; Milanova, V.; Levterova, V. Implementation of Mycoplasma genitalium diagnostics with resistance detection. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Murray, G.L.; Bradshaw, C.S.; Bissessor, M.; Danielewski, J.; Garland, S.M.; Jensen, J.S.; Fairley, C.K.; Tabrizi, S.N. Increasing macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 809–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fernández-Huerta, M.; Barberá, M.J.; Serra-Pladevall, J.; Esperalba, J.; Martínez-Gómez, X.; Centeno, C.; Pich, O.Q.; Pumarola, T.; Espasa, M. Mycoplasma genitalium and antimicrobial resistance in Europe: A comprehensive review. Int. J. STD AIDS 2020, 31, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hook, E.W.; Peeling, R.W. Syphilis control: A continuing challenge. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 122–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Peeling, R.W.; Mabey, D.; Kamb, M.L.; Chen, X.S.; Radolf, J.D.; Benzaken, A.S. Syphilis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017, 3, 17073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Syphilis. Annual Epidemiological Report for 2023. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/syphilis-annual-epidemiological-report-2023 (accessed on 15 March 2026).
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2023; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2024. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/sti-statistics/annual/index.html (accessed on 15 March 2026).
- Giacani, L.; Lukehart, S.A. The endemic treponematoses. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 89–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lukehart, S.A.; Godornes, C.; Molini, B.J.; Sonnett, P.; Hopkins, S.; Mulcahy, F.; Engelman, J.; Mitchell, S.J.; Rompalo, A.M.; Marra, C.M.; et al. Macrolide resistance in Treponema pallidum in the United States and Ireland. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Beale, M.A.; Thorn, L.; Cole, M.J.; Pitt, R.; Charles, H.; Ewens, M.; French, P.; Guiver, M.; Page, E.E.; Smit, E.; et al. Genomic epidemiology of syphilis in England: A population-based study. Lancet Microbe 2023, 4, e770–e780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Arora, N.; Schuenemann, V.J.; Jäger, G.; Peltzer, A.; Seitz, A.; Herbig, A.; Strouhal, M.; Grillová, L.; Sánchez-Busó, L.; Kühnert, D.; et al. Origin of modern syphilis and emergence of a pandemic Treponema pallidum cluster. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 2, 16245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Peebles, K.; Velloza, J.; Balkus, J.E.; McClelland, R.S.; Barnabas, R.V. High global burden and costs of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2019, 46, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Lu, Y.; Chen, T.; Li, R. The female vaginal microbiome in health and bacterial vaginosis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 631972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kenyon, C.; Colebunders, R.; Crucitti, T. The global epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 209, 505–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Swidsinski, A.; Mendling, W.; Loening-Baucke, V.; Ladhoff, A.; Swidsinski, S.; Hale, L.P.; Lochs, H. Adherent biofilms in bacterial vaginosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 106, 1013–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Verstraelen, H.; Swidsinski, A. The biofilm in bacterial vaginosis: Implications for epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 26, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Fredricks, D.N.; Fiedler, T.L.; Marrazzo, J.M. Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 1899–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gelber, S.E.; Aguilar, J.L.; Lewis, K.L.; Ratner, A.J. Functional and phylogenetic characterization of vaginolysin from Gardnerella vaginalis. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 3896–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Santiago, G.L.; Deschaght, P.; El Aila, N.; Kiama, T.N.; Verstraelen, H.; Jefferson, K.K.; Temmerman, M.; Vaneechoutte, M. Gardnerella vaginalis comprises distinct genotypes with differential sialidase production. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 204, 450.e1–450.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Morrill, S.; Saha, S.; Varki, A.P.; Lewis, W.G.; Ram, S.; Lewis, A.L. Gardnerella vaginolysin potentiates glycan molecular mimicry by Neisseria gonorrhoeae. bioRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lewis, W.G.; Robinson, L.S.; Gilbert, N.M.; Perry, J.C.; Lewis, A.L. Degradation and utilization of mucus sialoglycans by Gardnerella vaginalis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 12067–12079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Stafford, I.A.; Workowski, K.A.; Bachmann, L.H. Syphilis complicating pregnancy and congenital syphilis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2024, 390, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bradshaw, C.S.; Sobel, J.D. Current treatment of bacterial vaginosis: Limitations and need for innovation. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 214, S14–S20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Machado, A.; Cerca, N. Influence of biofilm formation by Gardnerella vaginalis. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 212, 1856–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sobel, J.D. Bacterial vaginosis. Annu. Rev. Med. 2000, 51, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Muzny, C.A.; Sobel, J.D. Recurrent bacterial vaginosis: Clinical considerations. Int. J. Womens Health 2023, 15, 1317–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Muzny, C.A.; Schwebke, J.R. Pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis: Discussion of current hypotheses. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 214, S1–S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Arroyo-Moreno, S.; Cummings, M.; Corcoran, D.B.; Coffey, A.; McCarthy, R.R. Endolysins targeting Gardnerella vaginalis biofilms. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2022, 8, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Swidsinski, A.; Mendling, W.; Loening-Baucke, V.; Swidsinski, S.; Dörffel, Y.; Scholze, J.; Lochs, H.; Verstraelen, H. Persistent Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm following standard therapy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 198, 97.e1–97.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hardy, L.; Jespers, V.; Abdellati, S.; De Baetselier, I.; Mwambarangwe, L.; Musengamana, V.; Van de Wijgert, J.; Vaneechoutte, M.; Crucitti, T. A fruitful alliance: The synergy between Atopobium vaginae and Gardnerella vaginalis in bacterial vaginosis-associated biofilm. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2016, 92, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gordillo Altamirano, F.L.; Barr, J.J. Phage therapy in the postantibiotic era. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00066-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fischetti, V.A. Development of phage lysins as novel therapeutics. Viruses 2018, 10, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pires, D.P.; Cleto, S.; Sillankorva, S.; Azeredo, J.; Lu, T.K. Genetically engineered phages: A review of advances over the last decade. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016, 80, 523–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Schmelcher, M.; Donovan, D.M.; Loessner, M.J. Bacteriophage endolysins as novel antimicrobials. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 1147–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Topka-Bielecka, G.; Dydecka, A.; Necel, A.; Bloch, S.; Nejman-Faleńczyk, B.; Węgrzyn, G.; Węgrzyn, A. Bacteriophage-derived depolymerases against bacterial biofilm. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Smith, G.P. Filamentous fusion phage: Novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. Science 1985, 228, 1315–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bikard, D.; Euler, C.W.; Jiang, W.; Nussenzweig, P.M.; Goldberg, G.W.; Duportet, X.; Fischetti, V.A.; Marraffini, L.A. Exploiting CRISPR-Cas nucleases for antimicrobials. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 1146–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Payne, R.J.; Jansen, V.A. Understanding bacteriophage therapy kinetics. J. Theor. Biol. 2001, 208, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Melo, L.D.R.; Oliveira, H.; Pires, D.P.; Dabrowska, K.; Azeredo, J. Phage therapy efficacy: A review of the last 10 years of preclinical studies. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 46, 78–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Brüssow, H. What is needed for phage therapy to become a reality in Western medicine? Virology 2012, 434, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rostøl, J.T.; Marraffini, L. (Ph)ighting phages: How bacteria resist their parasites. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 25, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pirnay, J.P.; Blasdel, B.G.; Bretaudeau, L.; Buckling, A.; Chanishvili, N.; Clark, J.R.; Corte-Real, S.; Debarbieux, L.; Dublanchet, A.; De Vos, D.; et al. Quality and safety requirements for sustainable phage therapy products. Pharm. Res. 2015, 32, 2173–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abedon, S.T. Ecology of anti-biofilm agents II: Bacteriophage exploitation and biocontrol of biofilm bacteria. Pharmaceuticals 2015, 8, 559–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Harper, D.R.; Parracho, H.M.R.T.; Walker, J.; Sharp, R.; Hughes, G.; Werthén, M.; Lehman, S.; Morales, S. Bacteriophages and biofilms. Antibiotics 2014, 3, 270–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Azeredo, J.; Sutherland, I.W. The use of phages for the removal of infectious biofilms. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2008, 9, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Labrie, S.J.; Samson, J.E.; Moineau, S. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hampton, H.G.; Watson, B.N.J.; Fineran, P.C. The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes. Nature 2020, 577, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hodyra-Stefaniak, K.; Miernikiewicz, P.; Drapała, J.; Drab, M.; Jończyk-Matysiak, E.; Lecion, D.; Kaźmierczak, Z.; Beta, W.; Majewska, J.; Harhala, M.; et al. Mammalian host-versus-phage immune response determines phage fate in vivo. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Roach, D.R.; Leung, C.Y.; Henry, M.; Morello, E.; Singh, D.; Di Santo, J.P.; Weitz, J.S.; Debarbieux, L. Synergy between the host immune system and bacteriophage is essential for successful phage therapy against an acute respiratory pathogen. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 22, 38–47.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Schooley, R.T.; Biswas, B.; Gill, J.J.; Hernandez-Morales, A.; Lancaster, J.; Lessor, L.; Barr, J.J.; Reed, S.L.; Rohwer, F.; Benler, S.; et al. Development and use of personalized bacteriophage-based therapeutic cocktails to treat a patient with a disseminated resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00954-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pelfrene, E.; Willebrand, E.; Cavaleiro Sanches, A.; Sebris, Z.; Cavaleri, M. Bacteriophage therapy: A regulatory perspective. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 2071–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jault, P.; Leclerc, T.; Jennes, S.; Pirnay, J.P.; Que, Y.A.; Resch, G.; Rousseau, A.F.; Ravat, F.; Carsin, H.; Le Floch, R.; et al. Efficacy and tolerability of a cocktail of bacteriophages to treat burn wounds infected by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PhagoBurn): A randomised, controlled, double-blind phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lee, C.; Kim, H.; Ryu, S. Bacteriophage and endolysin engineering for biocontrol of food pathogens: Recent advances and future trends. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 8919–8938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fenton, M.; Ross, P.; McAuliffe, O.; O’Mahony, J.; Coffey, A. Recombinant bacteriophage lysins as antibacterials. Bioeng. Bugs 2010, 1, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gerstmans, H.; Criel, B.; Briers, Y. Synthetic biology of modular endolysins. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 624–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Love, M.J.; Bhandari, D.; Dobson, R.C.J.; Billington, C. Potential for bacteriophage endolysins to supplement or replace antibiotics in food production and clinical care. Antibiotics 2018, 7, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pastagia, M.; Euler, C.; Chahales, P.; Fuentes-Duculan, J.; Krueger, J.G.; Fischetti, V.A. A novel chimeric lysin shows superiority to mupirocin for skin decolonization of methicillin-resistant and -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 738–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Oliveira, H.; Melo, L.D.; Santos, S.B.; Nóbrega, F.L.; Ferreira, E.C.; Cerca, N.; Azeredo, J.; Kluskens, L.D. Molecular aspects and comparative genomics of bacteriophage endolysins. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 4558–4570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Briers, Y.; Walmagh, M.; Van Puyenbroeck, V.; Cornelissen, A.; Cenens, W.; Aertsen, A.; Oliveira, H.; Azeredo, J.; Verween, G.; Pirnay, J.P.; et al. Engineered endolysin-based Artilysins to combat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. mBio 2014, 5, e01379-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Schirmeier, E.; Zimmermann, P.; Hofmann, V.; Biebl, M.; Gerstmans, H.; Maervoet, V.E.T.; Briers, Y. Inhibitory and bactericidal effect of Artilysin Art-175 against colistin-resistant mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli isolates. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 51, 528–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Thandar, M.; Lood, R.; Winer, B.Y.; Deutsch, D.R.; Euler, C.W.; Fischetti, V.A. Novel engineered peptides of a phage lysin as effective antimicrobials against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 2671–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Landlinger, C.; Tisakova, L.; Oberbauer, V.; Schwebs, T.; Muhammad, A.; Latka, A.; Van Simaey, L.; Vaneechoutte, M.; Guschin, A.; Resch, G.; et al. Engineered phage endolysin eliminates Gardnerella biofilm. Pathogens 2021, 10, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Latka, A.; Maciejewska, B.; Majkowska-Skrobek, G.; Briers, Y.; Drulis-Kawa, Z. Bacteriophage-encoded virion-associated enzymes to overcome carbohydrate barriers during infection. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 3103–3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hughes, K.A.; Sutherland, I.W.; Jones, M.V. Biofilm susceptibility to bacteriophage attack: The role of phage-borne polysaccharide depolymerase. Microbiology 1998, 144, 3039–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kehoe, J.W.; Kay, B.K. Filamentous phage display in the new millennium. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 4056–4072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Henry, K.A.; Arbabi-Ghahroudi, M.; Scott, J.K. Beyond phage display: Non-traditional applications of filamentous bacteriophage. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Huang, J.X.; Bishop-Hurley, S.L.; Cooper, M.A. Development of anti-infectives using phage display. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 4569–4582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Finlay, W.J.; Bloom, L.; Grant, J.; Franklin, E.; Ní Shúilleabháin, D.; Cunningham, O. Phage display for high-specificity affinity reagents. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1485, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bratkovic, T. Progress in phage display and its applications. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 749–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wu, C.H.; Liu, I.J.; Lu, R.M.; Wu, H.C. Advancement and applications of peptide phage display. J. Biomed. Sci. 2016, 23, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Baarda, B.I.; Zielke, R.A.; Jerse, A.E.; Sikora, A.E. Lipid-modified azurin of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lai, S.K.; Wang, Y.Y.; Hanes, J. Mucus-penetrating nanoparticles for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2009, 61, 158–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zierden, H.C.; Ortiz, J.I.; DeLong, K.; Yu, J.; Li, G.; Dimitrion, P.; Bensouda, S.; Laney, V.; Bailey, A.; Anders, N.M.; et al. Enhanced drug delivery to the reproductive tract. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13, eabc6245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Citorik, R.J.; Mimee, M.; Lu, T.K. Sequence-specific antimicrobials using RNA-guided nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 1141–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yosef, I.; Manor, M.; Kiro, R.; Qimron, U. Programmable bacteriophages targeting resistant bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 7267–7272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Barrangou, R.; Doudna, J.A. Applications of CRISPR technologies. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 933–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kiga, K.; Tan, X.E.; Ibarra-Chávez, R.; Watanabe, S.; Aiba, Y.; Sato’o, Y.; Li, F.-Y.; Sasahara, T.; Cui, B.; Kawauchi, M.; et al. CRISPR-Cas13a-based antimicrobials. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mayorga-Ramos, A.; Zúñiga-Miranda, J.; Carrera-Pacheco, S.E.; Barba-Ostria, C.; Guamán, L.P. CRISPR-Cas-based antimicrobials: Design and challenges. ACS Infect. Dis. 2023, 9, 1283–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gencay, Y.E.; Jasinskytė, D.; Robert, C.; Semsey, S.; Martínez, V.; Petersen, A.Ø.; Brunner, K.; Torio, A.d.S.; Salazar, A.; Turcu, I.C.; et al. Engineered phage with antibacterial CRISPR-Cas. Nat. Biotechnol. 2024, 42, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hsu, P.D.; Lander, E.S.; Zhang, F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell 2014, 157, 1262–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Pursey, E.; Sünderhauf, D.; Gaze, W.H.; Westra, E.R.; van Houte, S. CRISPR-Cas antimicrobials: Challenges and future prospects. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1006990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kenyon, C.; Manoharan-Basil, S.S. Macrolide consumption and resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 1235–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Seña, A.C.; Matoga, M.M.; Yang, L.; Lopez-Medina, E.; Aghakhanian, F.; Chen, J.S.; Bettin, E.B.; Caimano, M.J.; Chen, W.; Garcia-Luna, J.A.; et al. Clinical and genomic diversity of Treponema pallidum to inform vaccine research: An international molecular epidemiology study. Lancet Microbe 2024, 5, 100871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Romeis, E.; Tantalo, L.; Lieberman, N.; Phung, Q.; Greninger, A.; Giacani, L. Genetic engineering of Treponema pallidum. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Edmondson, D.G.; Hu, B.; Norris, S.J. Long-term in vitro culture of Treponema pallidum. mBio 2018, 9, e01153-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Castro, J.; Sousa, L.G.V.; França, Â.; Podpera Tisakova, L.; Corsini, L.; Cerca, N. Anti-biofilm effect of engineered endolysin PM-477. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- O’Hanlon, D.E.; Moench, T.R.; Cone, R.A. Vaginal pH and lactic acid. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ravel, J.; Gajer, P.; Abdo, Z.; Schneider, G.M.; Koenig, S.S.; McCulle, S.L.; Karlebach, R.; Gorle, R.; Russell, J.; Tacket, C.O.; et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4680–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Atashili, J.; Poole, C.; Ndumbe, P.M.; Adimora, A.A.; Smith, J.S. Bacterial vaginosis and HIV acquisition: A meta-analysis. AIDS 2008, 22, 1493–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Muzny, C.A.; Taylor, C.M.; Swords, W.E.; Tamhane, A.; Chattopadhyay, D.; Cerca, N.; Schwebke, J.R. Updated model of bacterial vaginosis pathogenesis. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 220, 1399–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Piekarowicz, A.; Kłyż, A.; Majchrzak, M.; Szczęsna, E.; Piechucki, M.; Kwiatek, A.; Maugel, T.K.; Stein, D.C. Neisseria gonorrhoeae filamentous phage NgoΦ6. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 1002–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ensign, L.M.; Cone, R.; Hanes, J. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery to the vagina: A review. J. Control. Release 2014, 190, 500–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- das Neves, J.; Bahia, M.F. Gels as vaginal drug delivery systems. Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 318, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Caramella, C.M.; Rossi, S.; Ferrari, F.; Bonferoni, M.C.; Sandri, G. Mucoadhesive and thermogelling systems for vaginal drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 92, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Leyva-Gómez, G.; Piñón-Segundo, E.; Mendoza-Muñoz, N.; Zambrano-Zaragoza, M.L.; Mendoza-Elvira, S.; Quintanar-Guerrero, D. Approaches in polymeric nanoparticles for vaginal drug delivery: A review of the state of the art. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ensign, L.M.; Cone, R.; Hanes, J. Oral drug delivery with polymeric nanoparticles: The gastrointestinal mucus barriers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 557–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fauconnier, A. Phage therapy regulation: From night to dawn. Viruses 2019, 11, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Huys, I.; Pirnay, J.-P.; Lavigne, R.; Jennes, S.; De Vos, D.; Casteels, M.; Verbeken, G. Paving a regulatory pathway for phage therapy. Europe should muster the resources to financially, technically and legally support the introduction of phage therapy. EMBO Rep. 2013, 14, 951–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Dedrick, R.M.; Guerrero-Bustamante, C.A.; Garlena, R.A.; Russell, D.A.; Ford, K.; Harris, K.; Gilmour, K.C.; Soothill, J.; Jacobs-Sera, D.; Schooley, R.T.; et al. Engineered bacteriophages for treatment of a patient with a disseminated drug-resistant Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 730–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Uyttebroek, S.; Chen, B.; Onsea, J.; Ruythooren, F.; Debaveye, Y.; Devolder, D.; Spriet, I.; Depypere, M.; Wagemans, J.; Lavigne, R.; et al. Safety and efficacy of phage therapy in difficult-to-treat infections: A systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, e208–e220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Manrique, P.; Dills, M.; Young, M.J. The human gut phage community and its implications for health and disease. Viruses 2017, 9, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Subramanian, A. Emerging roles of bacteriophage-based therapeutics in combating antibiotic resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1384164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hsu, B.B.; Gibson, T.E.; Yeliseyev, V.; Liu, Q.; Lyon, L.; Bry, L.; Silver, P.A.; Gerber, G.K. Dynamic modulation of the gut microbiota and metabolome by bacteriophages in a mouse model. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 25, 803–814.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]


| Pathogen | Key Translational Barrier | Most Plausible Phage-Related Strategy | Evidence Level | Translational Readiness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlamydia trachomatis | Intracellular localisation limits phage access | Nanoparticle-assisted intracellular delivery; engineered targeting systems | Conceptual | Low |
| Neisseria gonorrhoeae | Receptor variability and outer membrane accessibility | Engineered phages; phage-derived targeting platforms | Proof-of-concept | Low-Moderate |
| Mycoplasma genitalium | Absence of peptidoglycan cell wall | CRISPR-Cas-based targeting concepts; alternative intracellular strategies | Conceptual | Low |
| Treponema pallidum | Experimental inaccessibility and limited tractability | Future engineered or delivery-oriented phage-related approaches | Conceptual | Highly speculative |
| Bacterial vaginosis (Gardnerella-associated) | Extracellular polymicrobial biofilm environment | Endolysins; depolymerases; biofilm-disrupting enzymes | Experimental (preclinical) | Moderate (preclinical) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Syrym, N.; Yespembetov, B.; Kokanov, S.; Nakhanov, A.; Bulatov, Y.; Abdimukhtar, A.; Toleukhan, A.; Serikbay, Y.; Terebay, A.; Anarbekova, A.; et al. Bacteriophage-Based Therapeutics for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections: From Biological Barriers to Translational Strategies. Pathogens 2026, 15, 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15060559
Syrym N, Yespembetov B, Kokanov S, Nakhanov A, Bulatov Y, Abdimukhtar A, Toleukhan A, Serikbay Y, Terebay A, Anarbekova A, et al. Bacteriophage-Based Therapeutics for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections: From Biological Barriers to Translational Strategies. Pathogens. 2026; 15(6):559. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15060559
Chicago/Turabian StyleSyrym, Nazym, Bolat Yespembetov, Sabit Kokanov, Aziz Nakhanov, Yerbol Bulatov, Azamat Abdimukhtar, Alinur Toleukhan, Yeldos Serikbay, Aibol Terebay, Aktoty Anarbekova, and et al. 2026. "Bacteriophage-Based Therapeutics for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections: From Biological Barriers to Translational Strategies" Pathogens 15, no. 6: 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15060559
APA StyleSyrym, N., Yespembetov, B., Kokanov, S., Nakhanov, A., Bulatov, Y., Abdimukhtar, A., Toleukhan, A., Serikbay, Y., Terebay, A., Anarbekova, A., Tileukhanov, K., Alpysbayeva, S., Sarmykova, M., Yerzhigit, B., Zinina, N., Suleimenov, M., & Abdykalyk, A. (2026). Bacteriophage-Based Therapeutics for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections: From Biological Barriers to Translational Strategies. Pathogens, 15(6), 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15060559

