Next Article in Journal
Cattle Immunization with T7 Phage-Displayed Whole-Tick Antigens Reduces Amblyomma americanum Feeding Efficiency and Blocks Larval Tick Hatching
Previous Article in Journal
Feline Cryptococcosis: Two Case Reports and a Literature Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Classification and Anti-Streptococcus mutans Mechanism Summary of Chinese Botanical Products

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2026, 15(3), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15030280
Submission received: 22 December 2025 / Revised: 19 February 2026 / Accepted: 26 February 2026 / Published: 4 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)

Abstract

Dental caries, one of the most prevalent diseases worldwide, poses a significant threat to oral health. Streptococcus mutans is one of the key pathogenic bacteria associated with dental caries. Numerous Chinese botanical products (CBPs) have been shown to possess antibacterial effects against S. mutans. However, given the wide variety of CBPs that have been investigated, a systematic summary of their effects is needed. To address this need, in the present review, CBPs are categorized into five groups based on their major bioactive components: organic acid-based CBPs, alkaloid-based CBPs, phenol-based CBPs, anthraquinone-based CBPs, and other types. In addition to their chemical composition, the conventional use, pharmacological effects, and toxicity of these CBPs are also discussed, followed by an exploration of their anti-S. mutans mechanisms, including the synthesis of biofilm scaffolds and water-insoluble glucans, energy metabolism and soluble glucan production, acid generation and tolerance, bacterial cell integrity, remineralization processes, and intercellular communication via quorum sensing (QS). In summary, it is suggested that CBPs have considerable benefits in caries prevention and could be promisingly applied in clinical treatments.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Dental caries, a chronic progressive disease occurring on the hard tissues of teeth, is driven by multiple factors including microorganisms, oral environment, host and time [1]. It is one of the most prevalent diseases worldwide and has become one of the main causes of tooth loss over the years. In 2021, there were approximately 2.3 billion people suffering from permanent dental caries and 530 million children suffering from primary dental caries around the world [2].
Streptococcus mutans is one of the key pathogenic bacteria associated with dental caries due to its acidogenicity and aciduricity [3]. S. mutans utilizes sucrose to generate glucose and fructose, and further ferments to lactic acid or synthesizes extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) through glucosyltransferases (Gtfs) regulation. EPS is the main component of the cariogenic biofilm matrix [1].
CBPs have been used as folk medicines for thousands of years, while modern medicine tries to explore their bioactive components and identify their antibacterial effects. As early as the Western Han Dynasty (206 BC–AD 8), ancient Chinese physicians recommended rinsing the mouth with a decoction of Sophora flavescens to relieve tooth decay and oral discomfort, often in combination with acupuncture and moxibustion [4]. In recent years, with advances in modern medicine and molecular microbiology, many researchers have conducted extensive studies on CBPs and S. mutans. However, due to the complex and diverse nature of CBPs, a clear classification system is lacking, making it difficult to comprehensively understand their effects on S. mutans. This review aims to classify anti-S. mutans CBPs based on their main bioactive components and to further elucidate working mechanisms at the molecular level.

2. Classifications of Anti-S. mutans CBPs

Based on the properties and characteristics of bioactive components, CBPs are classified into five groups, organic acid-based CBPs, alkaloid-based CBPs, phenol-based CBPs, anthraquinone-based CBPs, and other types. The overall classification framework is visually demonstrated in Figure 1. Their classifications, names, bioactive ingredients, chemical structures, and sources are summarized in Table 1.

2.1. Organic Acid-Based CBPs

Organic acid-based CBPs include Galla chinensis (GC), licorice root (Radix glycyrrhizae), honey-suckle (Lonicera japonica), plum (Prunus mume), Anisum stellatim, etc. The organic acids are defined as acidic organic compounds, which are widely distributed in the leaves, roots, and fruits of CBPs.
The anti-caries effect of acid-based TCMs is rooted in their acidic bioactive ingredient. Organic acid, with its fat-soluble property, can diffuse across bacterial cell membranes to reach the interior of the cell to disrupt cell function [5]. Groups like carboxyl and hydroxyl can act as chelating agents and deprive bacteria of essential trace elements such as iron to interfere with their metabolic enzyme activity [6]. Specifically, some phenolic hydroxyl groups can simultaneously bind to the organic matrix and calcium ions in teeth, acting as a “molecular bridge”, enabling them to promote remineralization in a targeted manner [7].
GC is among the most frequently investigated anti-S. mutans CBPs, with tannic acid compound as the main effective component [8]. It was identified as a natural medical product as early as the Tang Dynasty (618-907 AD) in ancient China and was traditionally used for cough, bleeding, diarrhea, vomiting, sweating, and hemorrhoids [9]. Recent studies have revealed its antibacterial, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, and even antitumor effects [10]. GC yields over 50 constituents, with gallic acid (GA), methyl gallate (MG), and polymeric polyphenols exhibiting the highest efficacy in inhibiting caries [11]. Chemical structural analysis shows that GC mainly consists of gallotannins, which are composed of a glucose core surrounded by several tannic acid units [12]. Notably, different extracts isolated from GC express varying degrees of inhibitory ability. Among them, gallotannins, the aqueous extract of GC, showed the strongest antibacterial activity, followed by polyphenols [13]. Kang et al. [14] reported a stronger antibiofilm activity of MG than GA and they surprisingly detected that polyphenols additionally inhibit the activity of Gtfs.
Radix glycyrrhizae (licorice root) is another promising acid-based anti-S. mutans CBP. It is derived from the dried roots and rhizomes of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch, Glycyrrhiza inflata, or Glycyrrhiza glabra [15]. The roots and rhizomes are harvested, dried, and processed into licorice root extracts, which are extensively applied in cosmetics, foods, and medicine. In medical applications, it plays an essential role in many pharmaceutical formulas and was originally applied in gastrointestinal diseases such as gastritis and peptic ulcers [16]. Research studies within recent decades have validated that licorice root extracts, especially the glycyrrhizic acid fraction, have a surface coating effect that protects the tooth surface from microbial attachment and suppress the activity of Gtfs at the same time [17]. Lollipops with licorice root extracts have been demonstrated to have good acceptance among children because of their mild sweet taste [18], which represents its possible application in early childhood caries management.
Lonicera japonica (honeysuckle), Prunus mume (plum) and Anisum stellatum are less studied but also found to prevent caries to some extent. Honeysuckle, the dried flower buds or flowers in the early blooming stage of Lonicera japonica, is known as Jin Yin Hua in traditional Chinese medicine [19]. The main pharmacological bioactive components of honeysuckle include chlorogenic acid and luteolin glycosides. Metabolomics and transcriptomics analyses revealed that chlorogenic acid could decrease dental plaque formation by downregulating the activity of Gtfs through the quorum sensing (QS) system and a transcriptional regulator [20].
Prunus mume, originating from the south of mainland China (named méi), has been used for a long time in Eastern Asia [21]. While it has been demonstrated that plum could lower the vitality of oral bacteria [22], patients might have difficulty in accepting the sour taste. Anisum stellatum is a culinary spice with medicinal value. It is the dried ripe fruit of Illicium verum, with shikimic acid as the main bioactive constituent [23]. Traditionally, shikimic acid inhibits platelet aggregation and thrombosis by affecting arachidonic acid metabolism and has analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties [24]. Simultaneously, Zhang et al. [25] pointed out that shikimic acid could also prevent caries by reducing plaque biofilm and virulence factors.

2.2. Alkaloid-Based CBPs

Alkaloids are nitrogen-containing compounds that are naturally occurring and have a variety of biological activities, including antimicrobial properties [26]. Alkaloid-based CBPs could exert an anti-caries effect through adsorbing onto the surface of the negatively charged bacterial cell membrane by electrostatic action, resulting in bacterial lysis and the release of cell contents [27]. The complex circular structures of alkaloids may also help them to embed into DNA or proteins, interfere with gene expression, and regulate enzymatic activity, thus effectively inhibiting cariogenic biofilm formation and maturation [27,28].
Berberine is a kind of isoquinoline alkaloid extracted from the rhizomes of Coptis chinensis, possessing a wide range of therapeutic values with few side effects for long-term use [29]. As a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent, especially against Shigella dysenteria, Vibrio cholera and Salmonella typhi, it has been continuously used to treat bacterial diarrhea since ancient times, including functional diarrhea or diarrhea-type irritable bowel syndrome [30]. Recent studies have reported a new discovery that berberine is promising for the prevention and management of caries, primarily through its inhibition of biofilm formation and suppression of cariogenic virulence factor expression [28].
Chelidonium majus (Papaveraceae) extracts exhibit antimicrobial activity due to their complex alkaloid composition [31]. At present, there were 94 alkaloids isolated and distinguished from Chelidonium majus, and the bioactive ingredients aporphines belong to the isoquinoline alkaloids [32]. Isoquinoline alkaloids are a class of alkaloids derived from phenylalanine or tyrosine, which have a wide range of pharmacological values, including antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and antitussive effects [33]. Some scholars have further reported a significant inhibitory effect against S. mutans of chelerythrine, an alkaloid extracted from Chelidonium majus, primarily by reducing the adhesion ability of oral bacteria [34].
Sophora flavescens, also known as “Kushen”, is a deciduous shrub widely distributed throughout East Asia and commonly used for clearing heat, killing worms, and as a diuretic [35]. Sophora flavescens produces a wide range of secondary metabolites including multiple alkaloids. Among them, matrine and oxymatrine are the main bioactive ingredients, exerting anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and immunosuppression effects [36]. It was reported that sophoraflavanone G isolated from Sophora flavescens was able to inhibit the growth of S. mutans around 0.5~4 μg/mL [37], and S. mutans was susceptible to Sophora flavescens’s other extract [38].

2.3. Phenol-Based CBPs

Phenolic compounds refer to hydroxyl derivatives of aromatic hydrocarbons, which display antibacterial effects against a variety of oral bacteria including S. mutans [39]. Due to the polyphenol chemical structure, phenol-based CBPs can usually strongly bind proteins and polysaccharides through hydrogen bonding and hydrophobicity with phenol hydroxyl groups [40,41]. This property allows them to efficiently “grasp” and neutralize Gtfs enzymes, inhibiting the synthesis of viscous glucans [42]. At the same time, it can adhere to the surface of the bacteria, altering its hydrophobicity and thus destabilizing the biofilm [43].
Tea is the most widely studied phenol-based CBP since it is commonly known as a functional beverage and has countless health benefits [44]. Traditionally, tea has been used in disease prevention for its mild anti-infective, anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, anti-aging, anticancer, and immunity-enhancing effects [45]. Through different processing procedures, tea is classified into white tea, green tea, oolong tea, and black tea. Green tea is an unfermented type produced by drying and steaming fresh tea leaves, in which the activity of oxidase is disrupted at high temperatures and therefore the integrity of tea polyphenols (TPs) is protected to the largest extent [46]. TPs refer to a mixture of various polyphenols, with catechin accounting for the largest proportion. It is believed that catechins, epigallocatechin (EGC) and epigallocatechin gallateare (EGCG) are responsible for many of its biological activities [47]. With regard to the anti-S. mutans effect, the majority of experiments reflected that tea exhibited inhibitory activity against S. mutans, whether in vitro or in vivo [48]. TPs mainly work by inhibiting microbial adhesion and activities of glucan synthesis through Gtfs [49], and fractions devoid of monomeric catechins additionally inhibit S. mutans through interacting with bacterial surface proteins [50]. To ensure tea’s physicochemical stability and bioavailability in the oral cavity, some researchers have even tried to develop tea-loaded chitosan nanoparticles, and they surprisingly observed a significant reduction in MIC and MBC against S. mutans [51].
Propolis is a resinous substance produced by bees from plant resins and their own secretions to repair hives, containing phenolic and flavonoid compounds, and has been used therapeutically for centuries [52]. It holds significant promise in dentistry due to its broad-spectrum antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity, attributed to its multifaceted mechanisms such as disrupting microbial cell membranes, inhibiting bacterial adhesion and enzyme function, and modulating host immunity [53,54]. Laboratory evidence confirms its efficacy against key oral pathogens like S. mutans [55,56]. However, clinical translation is hampered by variability in composition, extraction methods, and product formulations, as well as methodological limitations in existing studies [57]. Future efforts should prioritize extract standardization and rigorous clinical trials to establish its efficacy, safety, and optimal application protocols in dental practice [54,57].
Clove is a dried flower bud belonging to the Myrtaceae family, which has been traditionally used for food preservation and medicinal purposes [58]. In addition to serving as an ornamental plant or a spice, clove has been put into clinical use for years due to the anti-inflammatory [59] and antimicrobial effects [60]. The main extraction, clove essential oil (CEO), plays an important role in its pharmacological effect, of which eugenol is the major fraction, accounting for at least 50% [61]. The results of in vitro antibacterial tests suggested that CEO displayed potent antibacterial effect especially against S. mutans, manifested as a larger inhibition zone compared with other traditional herbs [62].
In folk medicine, with magnolol and honokiol as primary bioactive phenolic components, magnolia officinalis has a long history of use for the effects of promoting dampness, warming the body to relieve pain, and reducing adverse reactions and asthma [63]. It has been used in the treat of gastrointestinal disorders for hundreds of years, such as inflammation and ulcers [64]. In recent decades, magnolia officinalis has received great attention for its anti-S. mutans property. It was previously found that magnolol significantly suppressed Gtfs activity at a concentration as low as 0.5 mg/mL [65]. Additionally, Sakaue et al. [39] found that magnolol displayed favorable penetration ability and a strong bactericidal effect on biofilms of S. mutans with less cytotoxicity compared with chlorhexidine. It is also recommended by a few research studies to add a low concentration of Magnolia officinalis extract into chewing gum or mouthwash to enhance their ability to reduce oral pathogens in daily use [66].

2.4. Anthraquinone-Based CBPs

Anthraquinones are polycyclic compounds with an unsaturated diketone structure and have a variety of biological activities including anticancer, antibacterial, and antioxidant activities that reduce disease risk [67]. In CBPs with anthraquinone compounds as main bioactive ingredients, Aloe vera and Polygonum cuspidatum have drawn a great deal of interest. The planar conjugated aromatic structure of anthraquinones is the key to their anti-S. mutans function. This flat structural feature makes it easier to insert into the grooves of DNA double helices or transcriptional regulatory proteins, thereby interfering with the gene transcription program of S. mutans at the molecular level and inhibiting its cariogenicity [68].
Aloe vera ranks among the most widely used herbs due to its multiple cosmetic and medicinal properties [69]. Apart from application in skincare products, Aloe vera still has a series of benefits like anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic and antimicrobial effects [70]. Antibacterial tests showed that S. mutans was susceptible to Aloe vera among oral pathogens and it was proved by an in vitro model tested on extracted permanent molar that the application of Aloe vera gel could improve the enamel density and surface hardness [71]. In vivo studies also suggested herbal agents like Aloe vera could be employed as an oral antiseptic to reduce the occurrence of secondary caries [72].
Polygonum cuspidatum, the dried rhizome and root of a plant of the family Polygonaceae, has a long history as a medicinal plant [73]. It has traditionally been used to treat inflammation and hyperlipemia [74]. There are two main bioactive ingredients, emodin and physcion, which can reduce the acidogenic capacity of S. mutans through significantly inhibiting its glycolytic process [75].

2.5. Other Types

Other types refer to those anti-S. mutans CBPs with bioactive ingredients not belonging to any of the types mentioned above, such as mint and cinnamon. The bioactive ingredients are mostly volatilized; therefore, it is commonly suggested that their low molecular weight and hydrophobicity are the chemical basis for their function [76,77]. These small molecules may rapidly penetrate the lipophilic region of the bacterial cell membrane, physically disrupting the arrangement of the lipid bilayer and leading to cell membrane leakage and cell lysis [78].
Peppermint has been used in the food industry and oral health products like toothpastes, mouthwash, dental floss, etc., for years [79]. The chemical composition of peppermint is complex, but the main extractions of peppermint are peppermint essential oil (PEO) and non-volatile components [80]. PEO, primarily composed of menthol, exhibits a diverse pharmacological profile including anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antiviral, immunomodulatory, antitumor, neuroprotective, antifatigue, and antioxidant activities [81]. Evaluation of the efficacy of PEO in caries prevention was also conducted, and it was claimed that mint was capable of inhibiting the growth and adherence of S. mutans and the activity of Gtfs [82,83,84,85].
Cinnamon is a well-known culinary spice that has also been traditionally applied in medical practices [86]. It has also shown potent antibacterial activity by directly damaging the cell membrane and reducing intracellular ATP [78]. The bioactive ingredients of cinnamon essential oil include cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, and linalool [87]. The potent antibacterial activity of cinnamon essential oil against S. mutans is primarily attributed to cinnamaldehyde, which damages bacterial membrane integrity, thereby increasing its permeability [88].

3. Mechanisms of Anti-Caries CBPs

The systematic classification of anti-caries CBPs based on their core bioactive components including organic acids, alkaloids, phenols, anthraquinones, and others provides a foundational framework for elucidating their mechanisms of action. The defining chemical features of each class, such as the ionizable carboxyl groups in organic acids, the complex nitrogenous structures in alkaloids, and the planar aromatic systems in phenols and anthraquinones, inherently govern their interactions with biological targets. These interactions enable CBPs to disrupt key virulence pathways of S. mutans in a targeted manner.
Specifically, the anti-caries efficacy of these compounds can be attributed to their concerted effects on several critical pathogenic processes: the synthesis of biofilm scaffolds and water-insoluble glucans, energy metabolism and soluble glucan production, acid generation and tolerance, bacterial cell integrity, intercellular communication via quorum sensing, and remineralization processes. The comprehensive regulatory network of these anti-caries mechanisms is illustrated in Figure 2. This mechanistic perspective underscores the advantage of CBPs as multi-targeted agents capable of modulating the cariogenic potential of the oral biofilm, offering a strategic approach to caries prevention that supports ecological balance rather than indiscriminate microbial elimination.

3.1. Biofilm and Insoluble Glucans Synthesis

The formation of dental plaque biofilm is a cornerstone of cariogenesis [89]. The process initiates with the adsorption of salivary proteins to enamel, forming an acquired pellicle [90]. S. mutans, as a primary pathogen, adheres to this pellicle via surface adhesins. Its key virulence factors, glucosyltransferases B and C (GtfB/C), then utilize sucrose to synthesize water-insoluble glucans (primarily α-1,3-linked) [91]. These glucans form a sticky, polymeric matrix that mediates firm microbial adhesion, facilitates coaggregation, and builds the structural scaffold of the biofilm, providing bacteria with enhanced resistance to antimicrobials and host defenses [92]. Disrupting this process by inhibiting enzyme activity, downregulating gene expression, or physically dismantling the biofilm can effectively undermines the foundation of dental caries. The specific effects of CBPs on biofilm scaffold and water-insoluble glucan synthesis are summarized in Table 2.

3.2. Energy and Soluble Glucans Synthesis

Beyond building the biofilm scaffold, S. mutans employs strategic carbohydrate metabolism for persistence [106]. The enzyme GtfD synthesizes water-soluble glucans (primarily α-1,6-linked) [107], which function not as adhesives but as extracellular energy reserves. These glucans can be catabolized during fasting periods, sustaining bacterial survival and acid production [108]. Concurrently, efficient glucose uptake via the phosphotransferase system (PEP-PTS) and its subsequent catabolism through glycolysis are paramount for rapid ATP generation and acidification [109]. By disrupting soluble glucan synthesis, blocking sugar transport, or inhibiting central metabolic pathways, CBPs can induce an energy crisis within the cariogenic community, weakening its competitivity and pathogenicity. The regulatory mechanisms of energy metabolism and soluble glucan production are detailed in Table 3.

3.3. Acidogenicity/Aciduricity

The direct demineralization of tooth enamel is importantly driven by bacterial acid production [114]. S. mutans ferments sugars to lactic acid predominantly via lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), defining its acidogenicity [115]. To thrive in this self-generated acidic niche, it employs the aciduricity mechanism, mainly through the F0F1-ATPase proton pump which exports intracellular protons to maintain pH homeostasis. The activity and assembly of this pump are tightly regulated, with genes like atpD encoding its critical subunits [116]. This dual capability to create and withstand acid is a masterstroke of cariogenic virulence. Inhibiting LDH activity or expression directly reduces the demineralizing agent, while impairing F0F1-ATPase function renders the bacterium vulnerable to acid stress, thereby restoring a more neutral oral ecology that is less conducive to caries progression. Molecular targets and effects related to acidogenicity and aciduricity are outlined in Table 4.

3.4. Cell Integrity and Other Metabolisms

The bacterial cell envelope, comprising the cytoplasmic membrane and cell wall, is essential for survival, governing selective permeability, structural integrity, and osmotic balance [122]. Disruption of this barrier leads to rapid cell death. CBPs employ diverse strategies to attack these cariogenic bacteria. Lipophilic compounds can integrate into and destabilize the lipid bilayer, causing rupture and ion leakage such as Ca2+ [123]. Others may act as chelators, sequestering essential trace metals like iron, and some may interfere with peptidoglycan synthesis, thereby weakening the cell wall. These direct, often broad-spectrum mechanisms target fundamental physiological processes, effectively eliminating pathogens regardless of their biofilm or planktonic state. Impacts on bacterial cell integrity and other metabolic pathways are presented in Table 5.

3.5. Demineralization Inhibition and Remineralization Promotion

Dental caries is fundamentally a dynamic process characterized by an imbalance between demineralization and remineralization [127]. The primary component of tooth enamel, hydroxyapatite (HA), dissolves when the local pH at the plaque–enamel interface falls below a critical level (pH ~5.5) due to bacterial acid production [114]. Conversely, remineralization occurs when calcium and phosphate ions from saliva or external sources precipitate back onto the enamel surface, especially under neutral or slightly alkaline conditions, repairing early subsurface lesions [128]. Unlike conventional anti-caries agents that primarily target bacteria, certain CBPs possess the unique ability to influence this mineral equilibrium directly. They can inhibit demineralization by protecting the enamel surface or collagen matrix, and more remarkably, enhance remineralization by acting as a source of mineral ions, facilitating their transportation to lesion sites, or templating the ordered growth of new hydroxyapatite crystals. This direct promotion of tooth tissue repair represents a pivotal and complementary strategy in the holistic prevention of dental caries. Strategies for interfering with quorum sensing systems are summarized in Table 6.

3.6. Interference with Quorum Sensing

Quorum sensing (QS) is a cell-density-dependent communication system that allows bacteria to coordinate group behaviors [133]. In S. mutans, the ComDE two-component system and the LuxS/AI-2 pathway are key QS systems regulating virulence traits such as biofilm development, acid tolerance, and bacteriocin production [134]. By interfering with QS through inhibiting signal synthesis, degrading autoinducers, or blocking receptor binding, CBPs can effectively disturb bacterial communication. Its anti-virulence strategy attenuating pathogenic behaviors without directly killing the bacteria reduces the selective pressure for resistance development and promotes a shift towards a healthier oral microbial equilibrium. The dual mechanism of demineralization inhibition and remineralization promotion is shown in Table 7.

4. Clinical Applications and Future Perspectives

Despite the promising in vitro and in vivo evidence, the direct clinical application of pure CBP extracts in dentistry remains limited. However, many kinds of CBPs have been incorporated into daily oral hygiene products and adjunctive therapies. Mouthwashes are one of the most mature clinical applications of CBPs. Propolis, tea polyphenols, and magnolia bark extracts are used in mouthwashes for their antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties [66,143,144]. Dentifrices containing herbal compositions like peppermint, clove, and licorice are widely available commercially, offering a natural alternative for caries prevention and oral health [145,146,147]. Chewing gum with Magnolia officinalis extract can effectively reduce salivary S. mutans levels and plaque acidity [148,149]. Apart from that, there are related clinical research studies about CBPs as well, such as licorice and fennel seeds being added into chewing gums for preventing dental caries [18,150].
Despite the evidence mentioned above, to further promote the widespread use of CBPs in clinical treatment, it is necessary to address the unknown various chemical components and related toxicity issues associated with CBPs. The inherent variability in the chemical composition of CBPs, influenced by factors such as plant source, geographic origin, harvest time and processing methods, poses a significant barrier to ensuring consistent efficacy and safety across different batches. In addition, there is a lack of large-scale, double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support the long-term efficacy and safe application of CBPs in caries prevention. To overcome these challenges and bring CBPs from bench to bedside, future RCTs are highly recommended. Furthermore, since synergistic combinations of CBPs with conventional agents (i.e., fluoride) could reduce the dose of both components and prevent side effects such as dental fluorosis, it is also promising to develop combined therapies and more efficient ways to deliver them precisely. Additionally, the combined effect often surpasses the effect of individual constituents. Deliberately exploring synergies between different CBPs, such as combining the enamel-protective organic acids of GC with biofilm-targeting phenolics from Magnolia officinalis, could enable the design of multi-targeted anti-caries formulations. Future research should employ systematic approaches like combination assays and network pharmacology to elucidate these interactions, optimize blending strategies, and develop evidence-based botanical therapies with enhanced clinical relevance.
In summary, this review provides a systematic and mechanistic framework for understanding anti-S. mutans CBPs by classifying them based on their primary bioactive components. This innovative approach moves beyond a simple listing of herbs and offers a clearer structure to elucidate their multi-targeted actions. Despite the unclarity of CBPs, in general, CBPs possess a significant anti-S. mutans effect and could benefit caries prevention in clinical practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and Z.F.; methodology, Y.L. and R.H.; validation, Y.L. and Z.F.; formal analysis, Y.L.; investigation, Y.L. and Z.F.; resources, R.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L. and Z.F.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. and R.H.; visualization, Y.L.; supervision, R.H.; project administration, R.H.; funding acquisition, R.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 3180011.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

AbbreviationsFull name
CBPChinese botanical product
EPSExtracellular polysaccharides
GCGalla Chinensis
GAGallic acid
MGMethyl gallate
GtfsGlucosyltransferases
GtfB/CGlucosyltransferase B/C
GtfDGlucosyltransferase D
QSQuorum sensing
MICMinimal inhibitory concentration
MBCMinimal bactericidal concentration
TP/TPsTea polyphenols
EGCEpigallocatechin
EGCGEpigallocatechin gallate
PEOMEPropolis essential oil microemulsion
CAPECaffeic acid phenethyl ester
CEOClove essential oil
PEOPeppermint essential oil
SEMScanning electron microscopy
TEMTransmission electron microscopy
PEP-PTSPhosphoenolpyruvate–carbohydrate phosphotransferase system
TCATricarboxylic acid
GTaseGuanylyl transferase
FtfFructosyltransferase
GbpGlucan binding protein
OTEOolong tea extract
OTF10Oolong tea polyphenol 10
AI-2Autoinducer-2
LDHLactate dehydrogenase
AFMAtomic force microscope
XRDX-ray diffraction
SMHSurface microhardness
%SMHRSurface microhardness recovery
CHXChlorhexidine
HAHydroxyapatite
RCTsRandomized controlled trials

References

  1. Chen, D.R.; Lin, H.C. Research Updates: Cariogenic Mechanism of Streptococcus mutans. J. Sichuan Univ. (Med. Sci. Ed.) 2022, 53, 208–213. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lowe, H.; Toyang, N.; Steele, B.; Bryant, J.; Ngwa, W.; Nedamat, K. The Current and Potential Application of Medicinal Cannabis Products in Dentistry. Dent. J. 2021, 9, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liljemark, W.F.; Bloomquist, C. Human oral microbial ecology and dental caries and periodontal diseases. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 1996, 7, 180–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, F.; Mu, X.; Li, Z.; Guo, M.; Wang, J.; Long, P.; Wan, Y.; Yuan, T.; Lv, Y. Characteristics of Chinese herbal medicine mouthwash clinical studies: A bibliometric and content analysis. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2023, 307, 116210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Amrutha, B.; Sundar, K.; Shetty, P.H. Effect of organic acids on biofilm formation and quorum signaling of pathogens from fresh fruits and vegetables. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 111, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, T.; Silva, J.; Kim, M.; Jung, Y. Enhanced antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial activity of tannic acid by thermal processing. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 740–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abdel-Azem, H.M.; Elezz, A.F.A.; Safy, R.K. Effect of Galla chinensis on Remineralization of Early Dentin Lesion. Eur. J. Dent. 2020, 14, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, T.; Chu, J.; Zhou, X. Anti-carious Effects of Galla chinensis: A Systematic Review. Phytother. Res. 2015, 29, 1837–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ren, Y.-Y.; Zhang, X.-R.; Li, T.-N.; Zeng, Y.-J.; Wang, J.; Huang, Q.-W. Galla Chinensis, a Traditional Chinese Medicine: Comprehensive review of botany, traditional uses, chemical composition, pharmacology and toxicology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 278, 114247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Djakpo, O.; Yao, W. Rhus chinensis and Galla Chinensis—Folklore to modern evidence: Review. Phytother. Res. 2010, 24, 1739–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu-Yuan, C.; Chen, C.; Wu, R. Gallotannins Inhibit Growth, Water-insoluble Glucan Synthesis, and Aggregation of Mutans Streptococci. J. Dent. Res. 1988, 67, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tian, F.; Li, B.; Ji, B.; Zhang, G.; Luo, Y. Identification and structure–activity relationship of gallotannins separated from Galla chinensis. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 1289–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xie, Q.; Li, J.; Zhou, X. Anticaries effect of compounds extracted from Galla Chinensis in a multispecies biofilm model. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2008, 23, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kang, M.-S.; Oh, J.-S.; Kang, I.-C.; Hong, S.-J.; Choi, C.-H. Inhibitory effect of methyl gallate and gallic acid on oral bacteria. J. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 744–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. He, L.; Kang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, M.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Gao, H.; Zhong, Z.; Tan, W. Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma: The popular occurrence of herbal medicine applied in classical prescriptions. Phytother. Res. 2023, 37, 3135–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rahnama, M.; Mehrabani, D.; Japoni, S.; Edjtehadi, M.; Firoozi, M.S. The healing effect of licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) on Helicobacter pylori infected peptic ulcers. J. Res. Med. Sci. Off. J. Isfahan Univ. Med. Sci. 2013, 18, 532–533. [Google Scholar]
  17. AlDehlawi, H.; Jazzar, A. The Power of Licorice (Radix glycyrrhizae) to Improve Oral Health: A Comprehensive Review of Its Pharmacological Properties and Clinical Implications. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tharakan, A.; Pawar, M.; Kale, S. Effectiveness of licorice in preventing dental caries in children: A systematic review. J. Indian Soc. Pedod. Prev. Dent. 2020, 38, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, N.; Huang, L.-Y.; Yang, S.; Li, J.; Hou, C.-Z.; Liu, Z.-H. Progress on the mining of functional genes of Lonicera japonica. Yi Chuan 2024, 46, 920–936. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang, L.; Liu, P.; Wu, Y.; Pei, H.; Cao, X. Inhibitory effect of Lonicera japonica flos on Streptococcus mutans biofilm and mechanism exploration through metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1435503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bailly, C. Anticancer properties of Prunus mume extracts (Chinese plum, Japanese apricot). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 246, 112215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Seneviratne, C.J.; Wong, R.W.K.; Hägg, U.; Chen, Y.; Herath, T.D.K.; Samaranayake, P.L.; Kao, R. Prunus mume extract exhibits antimicrobial activity against pathogenic oral bacteria. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2011, 21, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zou, Q.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Lu, C.; Yuan, J. A Comprehensive Review of the Pharmacology, Chemistry, Traditional Uses and Quality Control of Star Anise (Illicium verum Hook. F.): An Aromatic Medicinal Plant. Molecules 2023, 28, 7378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Huang, F.; Xiu, Q.; Sun, J.; Hong, E. Anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic effects of triacetylshikimic acid in rats. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2002, 39, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Zeng, W.; Li, Y. Inhibition of Biofilm Formation and Virulence Factors of Cariogenic Oral Pathogen Streptococcus mutans by Shikimic Acid. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0119922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rani, N.; Singh, R.; Kumar, P.; Sharma, P.; Kaur, R.; Arora, R.; Singh, T.G. Alkaloids as Potential Anti-HIV Agents. Curr. HIV Res. 2023, 21, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zeng, C.; Jiang, W.; Liu, C.; Yu, R.; Li, Y.; Li, P.; Cao, Y. Inhibitory effects of berberine against Streptococcus mutans: An in vitro insight on its anticaries potential. Microbiol. Spectr. 2025, 13, e0070025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wen, J.; Lin, H. The inhibitory effect of berberine chloride hydrate on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation at different pH values. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0217023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fang, S.; Guo, S.; Du, S.; Cao, Z.; Yang, Y.; Su, X.; Wei, W. Efficacy and safety of berberine in preventing recurrence of colorectal adenomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 282, 114617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Di Pierro, F.; Bertuccioli, A.; Giuberti, R.; Saponara, M.; Ivaldi, L. Role of a berberine-based nutritional supplement in reducing diarrhea in subjects with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Minerva Gastroenterol. E Dietol. 2020, 66, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zielińska, S.; Wójciak-Kosior, M.; Dziągwa-Becker, M.; Gleńsk, M.; Sowa, I.; Fijałkowski, K.; Rurańska-Smutnicka, D.; Matkowski, A.; Junka, A. The Activity of Isoquinoline Alkaloids and Extracts from Chelidonium majus against Pathogenic Bacteria and Candida sp. Toxins 2019, 11, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gerenčer, M.; Turecek, P.L.; Kistner, O.; Mitterer, A.; Savidis-Dacho, H.; Barrett, N.P. In vitro and in vivo anti-retroviral activity of the substance purified from the aqueous extract of Chelidonium majus L. Antivir. Res. 2006, 72, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gilca, M.; Gaman, L.; Panait, E.; Stoian, I.; Atanasiu, V. Chelidonium majus—An Integrative Review: Traditional Knowledge versus Modern Findings. Forsch. Komplementarmedizin 2010, 17, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cheng, R.-B.; Chen, X.; Liu, S.-J.; Zhang, X.-F.; Zhang, G.-H. Experimental study of the inhibitory effects of Chelidonium majus L. extractive on Streptococcus mutans in vitro. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue = Shanghai J. Stomatol. 2006, 15, 318–320. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sun, P.; Zhao, W.; Wang, Q.; Chen, L.; Sun, K.; Zhan, Z.; Wang, J. Chemical diversity, biological activities and Traditional uses of and important Chinese herb Sophora. Phytomedicine Int. J. Phytother. Phytopharm. 2022, 100, 154054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sun, J.; Wang, S.; Zhao, Z.; Lu, J.; Zhang, Y.; An, W.; Li, W.; Yang, L.; Tong, X. Oxymatrine Attenuates Ulcerative Colitis through Inhibiting Pyroptosis Mediated by the NLRP3 Inflammasome. Molecules 2024, 29, 2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, C.S.; Park, S.-N.; Ahn, S.-J.; Seo, Y.-W.; Lee, Y.-J.; Lim, Y.K.; Freire, M.O.; Cho, E.; Kook, J.-K. Antimicrobial effect of sophoraflavanone G isolated from Sophora flavescens against mutans streptococci. Anaerobe 2013, 19, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, S.-H. Antimicrobial effects of herbal extracts on Streptococcus mutans and normal oral streptococci. J. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sakaue, Y.; Domon, H.; Oda, M.; Takenaka, S.; Kubo, M.; Fukuyama, Y.; Okiji, T.; Terao, Y. Anti-biofilm and bactericidal effects of magnolia bark-derived magnolol and honokiol on Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol. Immunol. 2016, 60, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lai, X.; Li, Y.; Lan, W.; Zhao, L.; Wang, K.; Hu, Z.; Liu, X. Interactions between proteins and polyphenols in plant-based food: Insight of allergenicity and off-flavor reduction. Food Chem. 2025, 495, 146333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shahidi, F.; Athiyappan, K.D. Polyphenol-polysaccharide interactions: Molecular mechanisms and potential applications in food systems—A comprehensive review. Food Prod. Process. Nutr. 2025, 7, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yoo, S.; Murata, R.; Duarte, S. Antimicrobial Traits of Tea- and Cranberry-Derived Polyphenols against Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res. 2011, 45, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bai, H.; Liu, T.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z. Antibacterial characteristics and mechanistic insights of combined tea polyphenols, Nisin, and epsilon-polylysine against feline oral pathogens: A comprehensive transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2024, 135, lxae189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mazur, M.; Ndokaj, A.; Jedlinski, M.; Ardan, R.; Bietolini, S.; Ottolenghi, L. Impact of Green Tea (Camellia Sinensis) on periodontitis and caries. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2021, 57, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chen, F.; Liu, Q. Demystifying phytoconstituent-derived nanomedicines in their immunoregulatory and therapeutic roles in inflammatory diseases. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2022, 186, 114317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gaur, S.; Agnihotri, R. Green tea: A novel functional food for the oral health of older adults. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2014, 14, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Musial, C.; Kuban-Jankowska, A.; Gorska-Ponikowska, M. Beneficial Properties of Green Tea Catechins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Linke, H.A.; LeGeros, R.Z. Black tea extract and dental caries formation in hamsters. Int.-Al J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2003, 54, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Otake, S.; Makimura, M.; Kuroki, T.; Nishihara, Y.; Hirasawa, M. Anticaries Effects of Polyphenolic Compounds from Japanese Green Tea. Caries Res. 1991, 25, 438–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sasaki, H.; Matsumoto, M.; Tanaka, T.; Maeda, M.; Nakai, M.; Hamada, S.; Ooshima, T. Antibacterial Activity of Polyphenol Components in Oolong Tea Extract against Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res. 2004, 38, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Moreno, A.P.D.; Marcato, P.D.; Silva, L.B.; de Souza Salvador, S.L.; Del Arco, M.C.G.; de Moraes, J.C.B.; Rossi, A. Antibacterial Activity of Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) Loaded Lipid-chitosan Hybrid Nanoparticle against Planktonic Microorganisms. J. Oleo Sci. 2024, 73, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Balasubramaniam, A.K.; Elangovan, A.; Rahman, M.A.; Nayak, S.; Swain, D.; Babu, H.P.; Narasimhan, A.; Monga, V. Propolis: A comprehensive review on the nature’s polyphenolic wonder. Fitoterapia 2025, 183, 106526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Przybyłek, I.; Karpiński, T.M. Antibacterial Properties of Propolis. Molecules 2019, 24, 2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Assis, M.A.d.S.; Ramos, L.d.P.; Abu Hasna, A.; de Queiroz, T.S.; Pereira, T.C.; de Lima, P.M.N.; Berretta, A.A.; Marcucci, M.C.; Carvalho, C.A.T.; de Oliveira, L.D. Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Effect of Brazilian Green Propolis Aqueous Extract against Dental Anaerobic Bacteria. Molecules 2022, 27, 8128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yuan, J.; Yuan, W.; Guo, Y.; Wu, Q.; Wang, F.; Xuan, H. Anti-Biofilm Activities of Chinese Poplar Propolis Essential Oil against Streptococcus mutans. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, F.; Yuan, J.; Wang, X.; Xuan, H. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of Chinese propolis essential oil microemulsion against Streptococcus mutans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 134, lxad056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alghutaimel, H.; Matoug-Elwerfelli, M.; Alhaji, M.; Albawardi, F.; Nagendrababu, V.; Dummer, P.M.H. Propolis Use in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of Its Preventive and Therapeutic Applications. Int. Dent. J. 2024, 74, 365–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liñán-Atero, R.; Aghababaei, F.; García, S.R.; Hasiri, Z.; Ziogkas, D.; Moreno, A.; Hadidi, M. Clove Essential Oil: Chemical Profile, Biological Activities, Encapsulation Strategies, and Food Applications. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sugihartini, N.; Prabandari, R.; Yuwono, T.; Rahmawati, D.R. The anti-inflammatory activity of essential oil of clove (Syzygium aromaticum) in absorption base ointment with addition of oleic acid and propylene glycol as enhancer. Int. J. Appl. Pharm. 2019, 11, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Behbahani, B.A.; Noshad, M.; Falah, F. Study of chemical structure, antimicrobial, cytotoxic and mechanism of action of Syzygium aromaticum essential oil on foodborne pathogens. Potravin. Slovak J. Food Sci. 2019, 13, 875–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Haro-González, J.N.; Castillo-Herrera, G.A.; Martínez-Velázquez, M.; Espinosa-Andrews, H. Clove Essential Oil (Syzygium aromaticum L. Myrtaceae): Extraction, Chemical Composition, Food Applications, and Essential Bioactivity for Human Health. Molecules 2021, 26, 6387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Elgamily, H.; Safy, R.; Makharita, R. Influence of Medicinal Plant Extracts on the Growth of Oral Pathogens Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus Acidophilus: An In-Vitro Study. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 7, 2328–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Niu, L.; Hou, Y.; Jiang, M.; Bai, G. The rich pharmacological activities of Magnolia officinalis and secondary effects based on significant intestinal contributions. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 281, 114524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Xie, Q.; Li, H.; Ma, R.; Ren, M.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Chen, Z.; Gong, D.; Wang, J. Effect of Coptis chinensis franch and Magnolia officinalis on intestinal flora and intestinal barrier in a TNBS-induced ulcerative colitis rats model. Phytomedicine Int. J. Phytother. Phyto-Pharmacol. 2022, 97, 153927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Huang, B.; Fan, M.; Wang, S.; Han, D.; Chen, Z.; Bian, Z. The inhibitory effect of magnolol from Magnolia officinalis on glucosyltransferase. Arch. Oral Biol. 2006, 51, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ghorbani, F.; Haghgoo, R.; Aramjoo, H.; Rakhshandeh, H.; Jamehdar, S.A.; Zare-Bidaki, M. The antibacterial effect of Magnolia mouthwash on the levels of salivary Streptococcus mutans in dental plaque: A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Iran. J. Microbiol. 2021, 13, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, P.; Wei, J.; Hua, X.; Dong, G.; Dziedzic, K.; Wahab, A.; Efferth, T.; Sun, W.; Ma, P. Plant anthraquinones: Classification, distribution, biosynthesis, and regulation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2023, 239, e31063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Qun, T.; Zhou, T.; Hao, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, K.; Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Zhou, W. Antibacterial activities of anthraquinones: Structure–activity relationships and action mechanisms. RSC Med. Chem. 2023, 14, 1446–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Catalano, A.; Ceramella, J.; Iacopetta, D.; Marra, M.; Conforti, F.; Lupi, F.R.; Gabriele, D.; Borges, F.; Sinicropi, M.S. Aloe vera―An Extensive Review Focused on Recent Studies. Foods 2024, 13, 2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sánchez, M.; González-Burgos, E.; Iglesias, I.; Gómez-Serranillos, M.P. Pharmacological Update Properties of Aloe Vera and its Major Active Constituents. Molecules 2020, 25, 1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Al-Shaibani, M.; Al-Saffar, M.; Mahmood, A. The impact of aloe vera gel on remineralization of the tooth and its effect against enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study. Georgian Med. News 2023, 338, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  72. Al-Abdullah, A.; Edris, S.; Abu Hasna, A.; de Carvalho, L.S.; Al-Nahlawi, T. The Effect of Aloe vera and Chlorhexidine as Disinfectants on the Success of Selective Caries Removal Technique: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Dent. 2022, 2022, 9474677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lai, J.-Y.; Fan, X.-L.; Zhang, H.-B.; Wang, S.-C.; Wang, H.; Ma, X.; Zhang, Z.-Q. Polygonum cuspidatum polysaccharide: A review of its extraction and purification, structure analysis, and biological activity. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2024, 331, 118079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lachowicz, S.; Oszmiański, J. Profile of Bioactive Compounds in the Morphological Parts of Wild Fallopia japonica (Houtt) and Fallopia sachalinensis (F. Schmidt) and Their Antioxidative Activity. Molecules 2019, 24, 1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kwon, Y.-R.; Son, K.-J.; Pandit, S.; Kim, J.-E.; Chang, K.-W.; Jeon, J.-G. Bioactivity-guided separation of anti-acidogenic substances against Streptococcus mutans UA 159 from Polygonum cuspidatum. Oral Dis. 2010, 16, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Bastos, C.F.B.; Gomes-Filho, F.N.; Borges-Grisi, M.H.S.; D’aSsunção, V.C.S.C.; Barros, A.B.C.; Xavier-Júnior, F.H.; Almeida, L.F.D. Antibacterial effect of cinnamaldehyde in a microemulsion system against oral colonizing biofilms. Braz. J. Biol. 2025, 85, e294221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Guo, J.; Yan, S.; Jiang, X.; Su, Z.; Zhang, F.; Xie, J.; Hao, E.; Yao, C. Advances in pharmacological effects and mechanism of action of cinnamaldehyde. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1365949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Aljaafari, M.N.; AlAli, A.O.; Baqais, L.; Alqubaisy, M.; AlAli, M.; Molouki, A.; Ong-Abdullah, J.; Abushelaibi, A.; Lai, K.-S.; Lim, S.-H.E. An Overview of the Potential Therapeutic Applications of Essential Oils. Molecules 2021, 26, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Herro, E.; Jacob, S.E. Mentha piperita (Peppermint). Dermatitis 2010, 21, 327–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mahendran, G.; Rahman, L.U. Ethnomedicinal, phytochemical and pharmacological updates on Peppermint (Mentha × piperita L.)—A review. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 2088–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhao, H.; Ren, S.; Yang, H.; Tang, S.; Guo, C.; Liu, M.; Tao, Q.; Ming, T.; Xu, H. Peppermint essential oil: Its phytochemistry, biological activity, pharmacological effect and application. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 154, 113559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Acevedo, A.M.; Montero, M.; Rojas-Sanchez, F.; Machado, C.; Rivera, L.E.; Wolff, M.; Kleinberg, I. Clinical evaluation of the ability of CaviStat in a mint confection to inhibit the development of dental caries in children. J. Clin. Dent. 2008, 19, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Braga, A.S.; Girotti, L.D.; de Melo Simas, L.L.; Pires, J.G.; Pela, V.T.; Buzalaf, M.A.R.; Magalhaes, A.C. Effect of commercial herbal toothpastes and mouth rinses on the prevention of enamel deminerali-zation using a microcosm biofilm model. Biofouling 2019, 35, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Farias, J.M.; Stamford, T.C.M.; Resende, A.H.M.; Aguiar, J.S.; Rufino, R.D.; Luna, J.M.; Sarubbo, L.A. Mouthwash containing a biosurfactant and chitosan: An eco-sustainable option for the control of cariogenic microorganisms. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 129, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Cwik, J.; Gonzalez, L.A.; Shi, X.; Spirgel, C.C.; Yankell, S. Plaque reduction and tensile strength evaluations of three dental floss products. Am. J. Dent. 2021, 34, 123–126. [Google Scholar]
  86. Spence, C. Cinnamon: The historic spice, medicinal uses, and flavour chemistry. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2023, 35, 100858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Guo, J.; Jiang, X.; Tian, Y.; Yan, S.; Liu, J.; Xie, J.; Zhang, F.; Yao, C.; Hao, E. Therapeutic Potential of Cinnamon Oil: Chemical Composition, Pharmacological Actions, and Applications. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shu, C.; Ge, L.; Li, Z.; Chen, B.; Liao, S.; Lu, L.; Wu, Q.; Jiang, X.; An, Y.; Wang, Z.; et al. Antibacterial activity of cinnamon essential oil and its main component of cinnamaldehyde and the underlying mechanism. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1378434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ray, R.R. Dental biofilm: Risks, diagnostics and management. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 43, 102381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Huang, R.; Li, M.; Gregory, R.L. Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm. Virulence 2011, 2, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Schormann, N.; Patel, M.; Thannickal, L.; Purushotham, S.; Wu, R.; Mieher, J.L.; Wu, H.; Deivanayagam, C. The catalytic domains of Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferases: A structural analysis. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Commun. 2023, 79, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Saharan, B.S.; Beniwal, N.; Duhan, J.S. From formulation to function: A detailed review of microbial biofilms and their polymer-based extracellular substances. Microbe 2024, 5, 100194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhao, J.; Li, J.Y.; Zhu, B.; Zhou, X.D. Effects of traditional Chinese medicine on oral bacteria bio-film. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi = Zhonghua Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi = Chin. J. Stomatol. 2007, 42, 585–589. [Google Scholar]
  94. Edgar, W. Reduction in Enamel Dissolution by Liquorice and Glycyrrhizinic Acid. J. Dent. Res. 1978, 57, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Segal, R.; Pisanty, S.; Wormser, R.; Azaz, E.; Sela, M. Anticariogenic Activity of Licorice and Glycyrrhizine I: Inhibition of In Vitro Plaque Formation by Streptococcus mutans. J. Pharm. Sci. 1985, 74, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ham, Y.; Kim, T.-J. Synergistic inhibitory activity of Glycyrrhizae Radix and Rubi Fructus extracts on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2023, 23, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cheng, R.-B.; Chen, X.; Liu, S.-J.; Zhang, X.-F. Effect of Chelerythrine on cell surface hydrophobicity and adherence of Streptococcus mutans. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue = Shanghai J. Stomatol. 2007, 16, 68–72. [Google Scholar]
  98. Hattarki, S.A.; Bogar, C.; Bhat, K.G. Green Tea Catechins showed Antibacterial Activity on Streptococcus mutans—An In Vitro Study. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2021, 32, 226–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Goto, I.; Saga, S.; Ichitani, M.; Kimijima, M.; Narisawa, N. Investigation of Components in Roasted Green Tea That Inhibit Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation. Foods 2023, 12, 2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Subramaniam, P.; Eswara, U.; Reddy, K.M. Effect of different types of tea on Streptococcus mutans: An in vitro study. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2012, 23, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Uju, D.E.; Obioma, N.P. Anticariogenic potentials of clove, tobacco and bitter kola. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2011, 4, 814–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Fani, M.; Kohanteb, J. Inhibitory activity of Aloe vera gel on some clinically isolated cariogenic and periodontopathic bacteria. J. Oral Sci. 2012, 54, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Xu, J.-S.; Cui, Y.; Liao, X.-M.; Tan, X.-B.; Cao, X. Effect of emodin on the cariogenic properties of Streptococcus mutans and the development of caries in rats. Exp. Ther. Med. 2014, 8, 1308–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Jiamboonsri, P.; Kanchanadumkerng, P. Influence of Gallic Acid and Thai Culinary Essential Oils on Antibacterial Activity of Nisin against Streptococcus mutans. Adv. Pharmacol. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 2021, 5539459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Balasubramanian, A.R.; Vasudevan, S.; Shanmugam, K.; Lévesque, C.M.; Solomon, A.P.; Neelakantan, P. Combinatorial effects of trans—Cinnamaldehyde with fluoride and chlorhexidine on Streptococcus mutans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 130, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Jurakova, V.; Farková, V.; Kucera, J.; Dadakova, K.; Zapletalova, M.; Paskova, K.; Reminek, R.; Glatz, Z.; Holla, L.I.; Ruzicka, F.; et al. Gene expression and metabolic activity of Streptococcus mutans during exposure to dietary carbohydrates glucose, sucrose, lactose, and xylitol. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2023, 38, 424–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Wu, J.; Jiang, X.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Huang, R. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation by the Joint Action of Oxyresveratrol and Lactobacillus casei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 88, e0243621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Bowen, W.H.; Koo, H. Biology of Streptococcus mutans-Derived Glucosyltransferases: Role in Extracellular Matrix Formation of Cariogenic Biofilms. Caries Res. 2011, 45, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Xiang, S.-W.; Shao, J.; He, J.; Wu, X.-Y.; Xu, X.-H.; Zhao, W.-H. A Membrane-Targeted Peptide Inhibiting PtxA of Phosphotransferase System Blocks Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res. 2018, 53, 176–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Passos, M.R.; Almeida, R.S.; Lima, B.O.; de Souza Rodrigues, J.Z.; de Macêdo Neres, N.S.; Pita, L.S.; Marinho, P.D.F.; Santos, I.A.; da Silva, J.P.; Oliveira, M.C.; et al. Anticariogenic activities of Libidibia ferrea, gallic acid and ethyl gallate against Streptococcus mutans in biofilm model. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 274, 114059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sela, M.N.; Steinberg, D.; Segal, R. Inhibition of the activity of glucosyltransferase from Streptococcus mutans by glycyrrhizin. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 1987, 2, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Han, S.; Washio, J.; Abiko, Y.; Zhang, L.; Takahashi, N. Green Tea-Derived Catechins Suppress the Acid Productions of Streptococcus mutans and Enhance the Efficiency of Fluoride. Caries Res. 2023, 57, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ban, S.-H.; Kwon, Y.-R.; Pandit, S.; Lee, Y.-S.; Yi, H.-K.; Jeon, J.-G. Effects of a bio-assay guided fraction from Polygonum cuspidatum root on the viability, acid production and glucosyltranferase of mutans streptococci. Fitoterapia 2010, 81, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Harper, R.A.; Shelton, R.M.; James, J.D.; Salvati, E.; Besnard, C.; Korsunsky, A.M.; Landini, G. Acid-induced demineralisation of human enamel as a function of time and pH observed using X-ray and polarised light imaging. Acta Biomater. 2021, 120, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Spatafora, G.; Li, Y.; He, X.; Cowan, A.; Tanner, A.C.R. The Evolving Microbiome of Dental Caries. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Li, C.; Qi, C.; Yang, S.; Li, Z.; Ren, B.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.; Cai, H.; Xu, X.; Peng, X. F0F1-ATPase Contributes to the Fluoride Tolerance and Cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 777504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Aragão, M.G.B.; Aires, C.P.; Corona, S.A.M. Effects of the green tea catechin epigallocatechin-3-gallate on Streptococcus mutans planktonic cultures and biofilms: Systematic literature review of in vitro studies. Biofouling 2022, 38, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Xu, X.; Zhou, X.D.; Wu, C.D. The Tea Catechin Epigallocatechin Gallate Suppresses Cariogenic Virulence Factors of Streptococcus mutans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 1229–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ren, S.; Yang, Y.; Xia, M.; Deng, Y.; Zuo, Y.; Lei, L.; Hu, T. A Chinese herb preparation, honokiol, inhibits Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Arch. Oral Biol. 2022, 147, 105610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Duarte, S.; Rosalen, P.L.; Hayacibara, M.F.; Cury, J.A.; Bowen, W.H.; Marquis, R.; Rehder, V.L.; Sartoratto, A.; Ikegaki, M.; Koo, H. The influence of a novel propolis on mutans streptococci biofilms and caries development in rats. Arch. Oral Biol. 2006, 51, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. He, Z.; Huang, Z.; Jiang, W.; Zhou, W. Antimicrobial Activity of Cinnamaldehyde on Streptococcus mutans Biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Kleanthous, C.; Armitage, J.P. The bacterial cell envelope. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 20150019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Shao, D.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Tang, R.; Liu, L.; Shi, J.; Huang, Q.; Yang, H. Inhibition of Gallic Acid on the Growth and Biofilm Formation of Escherichia coli and Streptococcus mutans. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, M1299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wang, Y.; Lam, A.T. Epigallocatechin gallate and gallic acid affect colonization of abiotic surfaces by oral bacteria. Arch. Oral Biol. 2020, 120, 104922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Zulhendri, F.; Felitti, R.; Fearnley, J.; Ravalia, M. The use of propolis in dentistry, oral health, and medicine: A review. J. Oral Biosci. 2021, 63, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. El-Darier, S.M.; El-Ahwany, A.M.D.; Elkenany, E.T.; Abdeldaim, A.A. An in vitro study on antimicrobi-al and anticancer potentiality of thyme and clove oils. Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. E Nat. 2018, 29, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Pitts, N.B.; Zero, D.T.; Marsh, P.D.; Ekstrand, K.; Weintraub, J.A.; Ramos-Gomez, F.; Tagami, J.; Twetman, S.; Tsakos, G.; Ismail, A. Dental caries. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017, 3, 17030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Lawson, N.C. Current Evidence for Caries Prevention and Enamel Remineralization. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2025, 46, 128–134. [Google Scholar]
  129. Albutti, A.; Gul, M.S.; Siddiqui, M.F.; Maqbool, F.; Adnan, F.; Ullah, I.; Rahman, Z.; Qayyum, S.; Shah, M.A.; Salman, M. Combating Biofilm by Targeting Its Formation and Dispersal Using Gallic Acid against Single and Multispecies Bacteria Causing Dental Plaque. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Schneider-Rayman, M.; Steinberg, D.; Sionov, R.V.; Friedman, M.; Shalish, M. Effect of epigallocatechin gallate on dental biofilm of Streptococcus mutans: An in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Yin, W.; Zhang, Z.; Shuai, X.; Zhou, X.; Yin, D. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) Inhibits Cross-Kingdom Biofilm Formation of Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0157822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Niu, Y.; Wang, K.; Zheng, S.; Wang, Y.; Ren, Q.; Li, H.; Ding, L.; Li, W.; Zhang, L. Antibacterial Effect of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester on Cariogenic Bacteria and Streptococcus mutans Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Muras, A.; Mallo, N.; Otero-Casal, P.; Pose-Rodríguez, J.M.; Otero, A. Quorum sensing systems as a new target to prevent biofilm-related oral diseases. Oral Dis. 2022, 28, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Shanker, E.; Federle, M.J. Quorum Sensing Regulation of Competence and Bacteriocins in Streptococcus pneumoniae and mutans. Genes 2017, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Cheng, L.; Li, J.; Hao, Y.; Zhou, X. Effect of compounds of Galla chinensis on remineralization of enamel surface in vitro. Arch. Oral Biol. 2010, 55, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.; Cui, F.; Li, W. Effects of Galla chinensis on the surface topography of initial enamel carious lesion: An atomic force microscopy study. Scanning 2009, 31, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Li, H.; Deng, M.; Peng, S.C.; Shi, J.H. Effect of Galla chinensis on the Wear Resistance of Dentine. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 705, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhang, T.-T.; Guo, H.-J.; Liu, X.-J.; Chu, J.-P.; Zhou, X.-D. Galla chinensis Compounds Remineralize Enamel Caries Lesions in a Rat Model. Caries Res. 2016, 50, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sahin, F.; Oznurhan, F. Antibacterial efficacy and remineralization capacity of glycyrrhizic acid added casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate. Microsc. Res. Technol. 2020, 83, 744–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zaleh, A.-A.; Salehi-Vaziri, A.; Pourhajibagher, M.; Bahador, A. The synergistic effect of Nano-propolis and curcumin-based photodynamic therapy on remineralization of white spot lesions: An ex vivo study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2022, 38, 102789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Srisomboon, S.; Intharah, T.; Jarujareet, U.; Toneluck, A.; Panpisut, P. The in vitro assessment of rheological properties and dentin remineralization of saliva substitutes containing propolis and aloe vera extracts. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0304156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sarialioglu Gungor, A.; Donmez, N. Dentin erosion preventive effects of various plant extracts: An in vitro atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and nanoindentation study. Microsc. Res. Technol. 2021, 84, 1042–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Kiani, S.; Birang, R.; Jamshidian, N. Effect of Propolis mouthwash on clinical periodontal parameters in patients with gingivitis: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2022, 20, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Mehta, V.; Mathur, A.; Gopalakrishnan, D.; Rizwan, S.; Shetiya, S.H.; Bagwe, S. Efficacy of green tea-based mouthwashes on dental plaque and gingival inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2018, 29, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ashrafi, B.; Rashidipour, M.; Marzban, A.; Soroush, S.; Azadpour, M.; Delfani, S.; Ramak, P. Mentha piperita essential oils loaded in a chitosan nanogel with inhibitory effect on biofilm formation against S. mutans on the dental surface. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 212, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Goultschin, J.; Palmon, S.; Shapira, L.; Brayer, L.; Gedalia, I. Effect of glycyrrhizin-containing toothpaste on dental plaque reduction and gingival health in humans. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1991, 18, 210–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Oluwasina, O.O.; Ezenwosu, I.V.; Ogidi, C.O.; Oyetayo, V.O. Antimicrobial potential of toothpaste formulated from extracts of Syzygium aromaticum, Dennettia tripetala and Jatropha curcas latex against some oral pathogenic microorganisms. AMB Express 2019, 9, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Campus, G.; Cagetti, M.; Cocco, F.; Sale, S.; Sacco, G.; Strohmenger, L.; Lingström, P. Effect of a Sugar-Free Chewing Gum Containing Magnolia Bark Extract on Different Variables Related to Caries and Gingivitis: A Randomized Controlled Intervention Trial. Caries Res. 2011, 45, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Wessel, S.W.; van der Mei, H.C.; Slomp, A.M.; van de Belt-Gritter, B.; Dodds, M.W.J.; Busscher, H.J. Self-perceived mouthfeel and physico-chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2017, 125, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Manohar, R.; Ganesh, A.; Abbyramy, N.; Abinaya, R.; Balaji, S.; Priya, S.B. The effect of fennel seeds on pH of saliva—A clinical study. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2020, 31, 921–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic classification of anti-S. mutans CBPs based on major bioactive components. Created in BioRender. Li, Y. (2026) https://BioRender.com/1o3exy9 (Accessed on 25 February 2026).
Figure 1. Schematic classification of anti-S. mutans CBPs based on major bioactive components. Created in BioRender. Li, Y. (2026) https://BioRender.com/1o3exy9 (Accessed on 25 February 2026).
Pathogens 15 00280 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the anti-caries mechanisms of CBPs targeting S. mutans. Created in BioRender. Li, Y. (2026) https://BioRender.com/yzw7ukt (Accessed on 25 February 2026).
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the anti-caries mechanisms of CBPs targeting S. mutans. Created in BioRender. Li, Y. (2026) https://BioRender.com/yzw7ukt (Accessed on 25 February 2026).
Pathogens 15 00280 g002
Table 1. Classification, active ingredients, chemical structure and source of anti-carious TCMs.
Table 1. Classification, active ingredients, chemical structure and source of anti-carious TCMs.
ClassificationNameBioactive IngredientsChemical structureSource
Organic acid-basedGalla ChinensisGallic acid, methyl gallate, polymeric polyphenolsPathogens 15 00280 i001
Gallic acid
The gall forming when the Chinese sumac aphid Baker (Melaphis chinensis Bell) parasitizes the leaves of Rhus chinensis
Radix glycyrrhizae (licorice root)Glycyrrhizic acid
(Glycryrrhizin)
Pathogens 15 00280 i002
Glycyrrhizin
The dried roots and rhizomes of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch, Glycyrrhiza inflata or Glycyrrhiza glabra
Lonicera japonica (honeysuckle)Chlorogenic acid, luteolin glycosidesPathogens 15 00280 i003
Chlorogenic acid
The dried flower buds or flowers in the early blooming stage of Lonicera japonica
Prunus mume (plum)Citric acid, mallic acid, chlorogenic acidPathogens 15 00280 i004
Citric acid
The dried nearly ripe fruit of Prunus mume
Anisum stellatumShikimic acidPathogens 15 00280 i005
Shikimic acid
The dried ripe fruit of Illicium verum
Alkaloid-basedCoptis chinensisBerberinePathogens 15 00280 i006
Berberine
The dried rhizome of Coptis chinensis
Chelidonium majusChelerythrinePathogens 15 00280 i007
Chelerythrine
The whole herb of Chelidonium majus
Sophora flavescensMatrine, oxymatrinePathogens 15 00280 i008
Matrine
The dried roots of Sophora flavescens
Phenol-basedTeaTea polyphenols
(catechins, EGC, EGCG)
Pathogens 15 00280 i009
Catechin
The tender leaves or buds of the plant Camellia sinensis
PropolisQuercetin, rutin, apigeninPathogens 15 00280 i010
Quercetin
A natural product processed from the resinous substances secreted by honeybees
CloveEugenol Pathogens 15 00280 i011
Eugenol
The dried flower buds of Syzygium aromaticum
Magnolia officinalisMagnolol, honokiolPathogens 15 00280 i012
MagnololPathogens 15 00280 i013honokiol
The dried trunk bark, root bark or branch bark of Magnolia officinalis
Anthraquinone-basedAloe veraAloe emodin, aloinPathogens 15 00280 i014
Aloin
The concentrated and dried juice of the leaves of Aloe vera
Polygonum cuspidatumPolydatin,
emodin
Pathogens 15 00280 i015
Polydatin
The dried rhizomes and roots of Polygonum cuspidatum
Other typesPeppermintMentholPathogens 15 00280 i016
Menthol
The dried aerial parts of Mentha haplocalyx
CinnamonCinnamaldehyde, eugenol, linaloolPathogens 15 00280 i017
Cinnamaldehyde
The dried bark of Cinnamomum cassia
Shaddock pedLimonene, naringeninPathogens 15 00280 i018
Limonene
The pericarp of Citrus maxima
Note: The chemical structures of bioactive ingredients are obtained from the website ChemSpider: Search and Share Chemistry—Homepage (https://www.chemspider.com/, Accessed on 25 February 2026).
Table 2. Effects of CBPs on biofilm formation and insoluble glucan synthesis.
Table 2. Effects of CBPs on biofilm formation and insoluble glucan synthesis.
Classification (Bioactive Component)CBP (Representative Extract/Compound)Effect on GtfB/C
Activity
Effect on gtfB/C
Expression
Effect on Biofilm
Structure/Adhesion
References
I. Organic
Acids
1. Gallotannins/Phenolic acidsGalla chinensis
(Aqueous extract, tannic acid)
↓ (Direct
inhibition)
-↓ (Complexes with
pellicle, reduces affinity)
[13,93]
2. Triterpenoid saponinsRadix Glycyrrhizae (Glycyrrhizic acid)-↓ (Surface coating effect)[94,95,96]
3. Chlorogenic acidLonicera japonica (Chlorogenic acid)↓ (Via QS
inhibition)
--[20]
4. Shikimic acidAnisum stellatum
(Shikimic acid)
-↓ (Damages cell
membrane)
[25]
II. Alkaloids
1. Isoquinoline alkaloidsCoptis chinensis
(Berberine chloride)
--↓ (Downregulates srtA, gbpC; inhibits metabolic activity)[28]
2. Isoquinoline alkaloidsChelidonium majus (Chelerythrine)--↓ (Reduces adhesion ability)[34,97]
III. Phenols
1. Tea
polyphenols
Tea (EGCG,
catechins)
↓ (Non-competitive, binds glucan domain)↓ (Alters hydrophobicity & aggregation)[42,98,99,100]
2. Flavonoids/PhenolicsPropolis (PEOME, apigenin)-↓ (Increases
hydrophobicity,
damages membrane)
[56,74]
3. Phenolic lignansMagnolia officinalis (Magnolol)↓ (Non-competitive, binds glucan domain)-↓ (Penetrates biofilm)[39,65]
4. Eugenol
derivatives
Clove (Clove
essential oil)
--↓ (Damages cell
membrane)
[61,101]
IV. Anthraquinones
1. Anthraquinone
glycosides
Aloe vera (Gel)--↓ (Inhibits growth and adherence) [102]
2. Emodin, PhyscionPolygonum cuspidatum (Emodin)---[103] -
V. Others
1. Cinnamaldehyde, etc.Cinnamon
(Cinnamaldehyde)
-↓ (Alters hydrophobicity & aggregation)[104,105]
Table 3. Effects of CBPs on energy metabolism and soluble glucan synthesis.
Table 3. Effects of CBPs on energy metabolism and soluble glucan synthesis.
Classification (Bioactive Component)CBP (Representative Extract/ Compound)Effect on GtfD/ Soluble GlucanEffect on Sugar Uptake (PEP-PTS)Effect on Glycolysis/Energy MetabolismReferences
I. Organic acids
1. Gallotannins/ Phenolic acidsGalla chinensis (Gallic acid)↓ (Downregulates gtfD)--[110]
2. Triterpenoid saponinsRadix Glycyrrhizae (Glycyrrhizic acid)↓ (Inhibit Gtfs)--[111]
II. Alkaloids
1. Isoquinoline alkaloidsCoptis chinensis
(Berberine)
--↓ (Inhibits biofilm
metabolic activity)
[28]
III. Phenols
1. Tea polyphenolsTea (Catechins, TPs)-↓ (Blocks EIIC transporter)↓ (Downregulates
glycolysis & TCA cycle)
[43,112]
IV. Anthraquinones
1. Emodin, PhyscionPolygonum cuspidatum (Bioassay-guided fraction)--↓ (Produces anti-acidogenic substances,
inhibits glycolytic
process)
[75,113]
Table 4. Effects of CBPs on acidogenicity and aciduricity of S. mutans.
Table 4. Effects of CBPs on acidogenicity and aciduricity of S. mutans.
Classification
(Bioactive
Component)
CBP (Representative Extract/Compound)Effect on LDH
(Acidogenicity)
Effect on F0F1-ATPase (Aciduricity)References
I. Organic acidsGalla chinensis (Extract)- (Limits acid
accumulation)
-[12]
II. Alkaloids
1. Isoquinoline
alkaloids
Coptis chinensis
(Berberine hydrate)
↓ (Downregulates ldh expression)-[27]
III. Phenols
1. Tea polyphenolsTea (Catechins, EGCG)↓ (Inhibits activity; blocks substrate)↓ (Inhibits activity & atpD expression)[112,117,118]
2. Phenolic lignansMagnolia officinalis (Honokiol)↓ (Downregulates ldh expression)-[119]
3. Flavonoids/PhenolicsPropolis (Essential oil, PEOME, ethanol
extract)
↓ (Downregulates ldh; inactivates leaked
enzyme)
↓ (Inhibits activity, disrupts pH
gradient)
[55,56,120]
IV. Anthraquinones
1. Anthraquinone glycosidesAloe vera (Gel)--[102]
V. Others
Cinnamaldehyde, trans-CinnamaldehydeCinnamon ↓ (Inhibits glycolytic
enzymes)
↓ (Suppresses atpD expression)[105,121]
Table 5. Effects of CBPs on bacterial cell integrity and metabolism.
Table 5. Effects of CBPs on bacterial cell integrity and metabolism.
Classification
(Bioactive Component)
CBP
(Representative Extract/Compound)
Effect on Cell MembraneEffect on Ion Homeostasis/MetalsEffect on Cell Wall/Other
Metabolism
References
I. Organic acids
1. Gallotannins/ Phenolic acidsGalla chinensis (Gallic acid)↓ (Disrupts bilayer, causes Ca2+ efflux)↓ (Iron
chelation by tannic acid)
-[6,104,124]
2. Shikimic acidAnisum stellatum (Shikimic acid)↓ (Alters membrane proteins)--[25]
III. Phenols
1. Tea
polyphenols
Tea (EGCG, TPs)↓ (Reduces
hydrophobicity,
impairs
permeability)
-↓ (Disrupts
peptidoglycan cross-linking)
[43,124]
2. Flavonoids/PhenolicsPropolis (Extract)↓ (Alters
hydrophobicity, forms pores)
--[125]
3. Eugenol
derivatives
Clove (Clove
essential oil)
↓ (Penetrates and damages lipids)--[60,126]
V. Others
1.Cinnamaldehyde, etc.Cinnamon
(Essential oil)
↓ (Damages
membrane, reduces ATP)
--[78]
Table 6. Effects of CBPs on quorum sensing systems in S. mutans.
Table 6. Effects of CBPs on quorum sensing systems in S. mutans.
Classification (Bioactive
Component)
CBP
(Representative Extract/Compound)
Effect on ComDE SystemEffect on LuxS/AI-2 SystemEffect on Other
QS-Related Elements
References
I. Organic acids
1. Gallotannins/ Phenolic acidsGalla chinensis (Polyphenols)--↓ (Interacts with QS signals, undermines competence)[129]
2. Chlorogenic acidLonicera japonica (Chlorogenic acid)-↓ (Blocks AI-2
sensing)
↓ (Downregulates vicK)[20]
II. Alkaloids
1. Isoquinoline alkaloidsCoptis chinensis (Berberine)↓ (Suppresses comX expression)--[28]
III. Phenols
1. Tea polyphenolsTea (EGCG)-↓ (Downregulates luxS expression)-[130]
2. Flavonoids/PhenolicsPropolis (CAPE)--↓ (Downregulates vicK, vicR, ccpA)[131,132]
V. Others
1. Cinnamaldehyde, etc.Cinnamon
(trans-Cinnamaldehyde)
↓ (Downregulates comDE)↓ (Downregulates luxS)-[105]
Table 7. Effects of CBPs on demineralization and remineralization processes.
Table 7. Effects of CBPs on demineralization and remineralization processes.
Classification
(Bioactive Component)
CBP
(Representative Extract/Compound)
Effect on DemineralizationEffect on RemineralizationProposed MechanismReferences
I. Organic acids
1. Gallotannins/Phenolic acidsGalla chinensis (GC extract, Gallic Acid, Tannic acid)↓ (Inhibits ion diffusion)↑↑ (Significant enhancement)1. Provides Ca2+ ions.
2. Forms “enamel organic matrix–GC–Ca2+” complex to transport ions.
3. Forms “GC–dentin matrix” complex to stabilize collagen.
[7,135,136,137,138]
2. Triterpenoid saponinsRadix Glycyrrhizae (Glycyrrhizic acid)↓ (Reduces enamel dissolution)-Surface coating effect that limits acid access.[139]
III. Phenols
1. Flavonoids/PhenolicsPropolis
(Extract)
-↑ (Potential effect suggested)May aid in mineral deposition.[140,141]
2. Eugenol derivativesClove (Clove Essential Oil)-↑ (Potential effect suggested)May operate on de/remineralization balance.[60,142]
IV. Anthraquinones
1. Anthraquinone glycosidesAloe vera (Gel)-↑ (Improves enamel density/hardness)Application of gel improves surface microhardness in vitro.[71,141]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Fang, Z.; Huang, R. Classification and Anti-Streptococcus mutans Mechanism Summary of Chinese Botanical Products. Pathogens 2026, 15, 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15030280

AMA Style

Li Y, Fang Z, Huang R. Classification and Anti-Streptococcus mutans Mechanism Summary of Chinese Botanical Products. Pathogens. 2026; 15(3):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15030280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yuelin, Zhongyi Fang, and Ruijie Huang. 2026. "Classification and Anti-Streptococcus mutans Mechanism Summary of Chinese Botanical Products" Pathogens 15, no. 3: 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15030280

APA Style

Li, Y., Fang, Z., & Huang, R. (2026). Classification and Anti-Streptococcus mutans Mechanism Summary of Chinese Botanical Products. Pathogens, 15(3), 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15030280

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop