Next Article in Journal
Can Tick Microbiome Explain Nonlinear Relationship between Tick Abundance and Lyme Disease Incidence?
Next Article in Special Issue
Association of Ambient Temperature and Absolute Humidity with the Effective Reproduction Number of COVID-19 in Japan
Previous Article in Journal
In Vivo Efficacy of Curcumin and Curcumin Nanoparticle in Trypanosoma congolense, Broden 1904 (Kinetoplastea: Trypanosomatidae)-Infected Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Diversity of Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Sicily during Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Surveillance Seasons
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/pathogens12101228
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Identification of Potential Hazards Associated with South Korean Prawns and Monitoring Results Targeting Fishing Bait

by
Gyoungsik Kang
1,
Won-Sik Woo
1,
Kyung-Ho Kim
1,
Ha-Jeong Son
1,
Min-Young Sohn
1,
Hee Jeong Kong
2,
Young-Ok Kim
2,
Dong-Gyun Kim
2,
Eun Mi Kim
2,
Eun Soo Noh
2 and
Chan-Il Park
1,*
1
Department of Marine Biology and Aquaculture, College of Marine Science, Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeong 53064, Republic of Korea
2
Biotechnology Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Busan 46083, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(10), 1228; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12101228
Submission received: 2 September 2023 / Revised: 3 October 2023 / Accepted: 9 October 2023 / Published: 10 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epidemiology of Emerging Infectious Disease: Importance of Surveillance and Detection in Public Health Initiatives)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study detected two potential pathogens, Vibro parahaemolyticus, which causes acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND), and white spot syndrome virus (WSSV), in fishing bait in South Korea. However, their infectious nature was not confirmed, possibly due to the degradation caused by freezing/thawing or prolonged storage under frozen conditions. While infectivity was not confirmed in this study, there is still a significant risk of exposure to these aquatic products. Furthermore, fishing bait and feed should be handled with caution as they are directly exposed to water, increasing the risk of disease transmission. In Australia, cases of WSSV infection caused by imported shrimp intended for human consumption have occurred, highlighting the need for preventive measures. While freezing/thawing is a method for inactivating pathogens, there are still regulatory and realistic issues to be addressed.

1. Introduction

The global seafood trade is on the rise, and with the increasing distribution of seafood, the importance of quarantine inspection has also emerged to prevent the spread of diseases. In particular, since the emergence of COVID-19, quarantine inspections are considered almost the only measure for managing infectious diseases. Furthermore, there has been an increasing trend in which each country’s government agencies related to seafood inspection also notify the WTO/SPS of emergency inspection measures for emerging infectious diseases [1,2].
The risk and actual cases of disease transmission caused by seafood products such as fishing bait (regardless of whether quarantine measures are implemented or not) have been mentioned since ancient times [3]. This issue has remained a persistent concern in the field of academia. Therefore, for seafood products that are not subject to quarantine, the risk of disease transmission can be considerably higher. Recently, there have been numerous occurrences of disease transmission caused by fishing bait or feed [4,5,6,7]. The aquatic organism product used as fishing bait or feed is not subject to quarantine inspection in South Korea, which increases the risk of introducing various pathogens. In addition, since infected individuals are immediately exposed to aquatic environments, the risk of disease transmission is very high. Due to these risks, countries have developed various management strategies for seafood used as bait or feed [2,8,9]. In particular, although a variety of species are cultured for use as fishing bait, shrimp and crab are major bait items in South Korea [10].
Prawns, which are primarily used as a food source for human consumption in addition to fishing bait, haave steadily increased in consumption since the early 2000s [11]. However, it is estimated that several tons of prawns die each year due to various diseases [12]. Pathogens that cause significant damage to shrimp include white spot syndrome virus (WSSV), infectious hypodermal and haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV), and Taura syndrome virus (TSV), among others, and relatively recently reported diseases such as covert mortality nodavirus (CMNV), Decapod iridescent virus 1 (DIV1), and Laem-Singh virus (LSNV) also exist in addition to traditional pathogens [12,13,14,15]. In particular, there have been recent cases of detection of WSSV and IHHNV in fishing bait [16] and examples of significant damage caused by pathogens in natural aquatic environments. Therefore, in this study, surveillance was conducted on diseases that could be transmitted to shrimp through aquatic organism products used as fishing bait to investigate diseases that could be hazardous factors for prawns.
The importance of seafood as a major source of protein and economic value cannot be overstated. However, the increasing demand for seafood has led to various challenges, including the spread of infectious diseases among aquatic organisms, which can have severe consequences on the environment, the economy, and human health. In this regard, the transmission of diseases caused by fishing bait and feed is a growing concern that needs to be addressed. Despite the risks associated with the use of aquatic organism products as fishing bait, there is a lack of surveillance and management strategies for diseases that can be transmitted to seafood through fishing bait. Therefore, this study aims to investigate and identify potential hazardous diseases that could be transmitted to prawns through aquatic organism products used as fishing bait. The results of this study can help inform the development of management plans and surveillance programs to prevent the spread of diseases caused by fishing bait and feed, thus ensuring sustainable seafood production and consumption.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples Preparation

2.1.1. Sampling

In this study, fishing bait (crustaceans and mollusks), whose origins were verified by the seller, was purchased and utilized for analysis. Every effort was made to secure samples from diverse regions within South Korea (Table 1). To determine the species of the samples, 16S rRNA sequencing was performed according to the methodology of [17], which involves molecular biological identification and identification of the correct scientific name.

2.1.2. Preparation of Tissues for Analysis

When feasible, dissected samples including hepatopancreas, gill, muscle, pleopods, and subcuticular epithelial tissue were extracted for analysis. In cases of severe degradation, the entire cephalothorax was homogenized and utilized for analysis. In instances where the size of the prawn was small, the entire sample was used for analysis.

2.2. Identification of Hazardous Factors of Imported Prawns

The present study involved the identification and classification of potential pathogens that may enter South Korea through the import of designated aquatic organisms for quarantine purposes. The identification of hazards was based on ❶ the scientific literature and statistical data, ❷ case studies from other countries that have experienced risks associated with import routes and quarantine-designated items, ❸ expert opinions from fisheries-related and import risk analysis fields, and ❹ aquatic organism disease pathogens designated by the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH).
Risk factors were determined using the following criteria: ❶ the relevance to quarantine-designated items, ❷ the distribution of susceptible species in South Korea and their potential for causing severe diseases, ❸ the presence of the pathogen in exporting countries, and ❹ the management of the disease by the competent authorities of the exporting country (reporting of disease outbreaks, operation of control and eradication systems). Furthermore, if the pathogen was present in South Korea, hazard factors were selected based on ❶ whether the pathogen in the exporting country was highly pathogenic, and ❷ whether there are areas in South Korea where the pathogen does not occur or occurs at low levels.
Finally, hazard identification was conducted to determine the potential for diseases of prawns to be introduced as a pathogen that negatively affects domestic aquatic life or aquatic ecosystems and the environment due to the import of specific designated quarantine items.

2.3. Molecular Biological Analysis

2.3.1. DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA from the tissues from target organs was extracted using AccuPrep® Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Bioneer, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. However, in the case of Artemia franciscana, samples were pooled in 0.1 g units due to their small size and used for analysis.

2.3.2. Conventional PCR for Pathogen Detection and Real-Time PCR for Viral Copies

WOAH’s Aquatic Manual or internationally recognized test methods were used for primers used in the experiment (Table S1). A verified synthetic plasmid was used as a positive control, and the target band was confirmed through electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel.
For quantitative analysis, a positive control plasmid was constructed, diluted 10-fold, and then a standard curve was prepared using qPCR. The quantitative analysis was followed by protocols of [18].

2.3.3. Definitive Diagnosis

When the target band was confirmed as a result of PCR analysis, a definitive diagnosis was made through Sanger sequence analysis. Before sequence analysis, amplicon was extracted using a QIAquick® gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The purified PCR products were cloned into pGEM® T-easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and transformed into Escherichia coli JM109 competent cells according to the standard protocol. After full propagation, plasmid DNA was extracted using a Hybrid-Q™ plasmid rapidprep kit (GeneAll®, Seoul, Republic of Korea) and sequenced using the universal M13 primer set. Nucleotide sequence matching was performed for the identification of pathogen using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) algorithm of the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi (accessed on 31 December 2022)).

2.4. Histopathological Analysis

Histopathological analysis was performed on the pathogen detected samples. Each sample was fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 24 h. After fixation, all samples were collected and refixed in the same solution (10% neutral-buffered formalin) for 24 h before being gradually dehydrated with the ethanol series (70–100%). The samples were further cleared with xylene, then embedded in paraffin and sectioned into slices of 4 μm thickness. Finally, the sections were stained with hamatoxylin-eosin (H&E) following general protocols. Stained samples were examined under an optical microscope (Leica DM2500, Wetzlar, Germany).

2.5. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Analysis

For the ultramicroscopic observation of the pathogens in samples, 1 mm3 of the frozen samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, refixed in 2% osmium tetroxide, embedded in epoxy (EMS Embed 812, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, Montgomery County, PA, USA), dehydrated through a graded acetone series, sectioned to 80 nm, and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The sections were observed using a transmission electron microscope (Thermo Scientific Talos L120C, Waltham, Middlesex County, MA, USA).

2.6. Infectiousness Assessment

To confirm the activity and pathogenicity of the pathogen, an experimental infection was performed using the detected sample. Among pathogens identified as hazardous factors, pathogens that can be cultured were preferentially cultured. In the case of viral pathogens without a separate cell line, mortality was observed for two weeks by directly feeding the detected tissue.

3. Results

3.1. Sample Acquisition Status

In order to analyze the pathogens identified as hazardous factors for prawns, a total of 958 samples were obtained, comprising 574 samples of seven species of crustaceans, 384 samples of eight species of mollusks, and 24 pooled samples of Artemia franciscana (as presented in Table 2).

3.2. Pathogen Detection

3.2.1. Identification of Hazardous Factors

A hazard identification was conducted to evaluate diseases that have been associated with outbreaks in prawns. The diseases identified as potential hazards were subsequently analyzed to identify the specific pathogens involved and establish a disease surveillance program. In this study, pathogen screening was conducted for a total of twelve hazardous factors including CMNV, DIV1, EHP, IHHNV, IMNV, LSNV, NHP, TSV, AHPND, WSSV, WTD, and YHV1. The diseases that were subject to surveillance are detailed in Table S2.

3.2.2. Prevalence of VpAHPND and WSSV

WSSV was detected in Metapenaeus joyneri and Penaeus vannamei, and the VpAHPND gene was also detected in some P. vannamei in which WSSV was detected. The prevalence of WSSV and VpAHPND is described in Table 3. Pathogens other than VpAHPND and WSSV were not detected.

3.2.3. Viral Copies of WSSV

The viral genome copies of WSSV are distributed on average at 2.66 × 104 copies/g (2.67 × 10 to 5.06 × 105 copies/g) in the muscle and 5.84 × 105 copies/g (3.77 × 10 to 1.04 × 107 copies/g) in the midgut.

3.3. Infectiousness Assessment of Detected Pathogens

3.3.1. Infectiousness Assessment of VpAHPND

An attempt was made to isolate the pathogen from the tissue in which VpAHPND was detected, but it was presumed that the bacteria were not cultured and thus not a living pathogen, so an infectiousness assessment was not performed.

3.3.2. Infectiousness Assessment of WSSV

There was no developed cell line in the case of the detected WSSV yet, so oral infection was attempted like in [19,20,21], but the infectiousness was not confirmed as in the [22] study results.
The experiment was conducted on seven segments, including a negative control for all different species in the six regions where each prawn was detected (to trace the origin of infectiousness). Except for one mortality in each of the 2nd and 5th segments on the 13th day of the experiment, no other mortalities occurred, and WSSV was not detected in any of the specimens after the experiment concluded. Twenty-five whiteleg shrimp (P. vannamei) were stocked per segment in a 300 L rectangular tank. The temperature was maintained at 24 ± 1 °C, dissolved oxygen at 8.0 ± 0.3 mg/L, salinity at 30 ± 0.4, and pH at 7.7 ± 0.1 throughout the experiment, which lasted for 14 days.

3.4. Histopathology

Following histopathological analysis, evidence of necrosis indicative of inflammation was observed surrounding the sub-cuticular epithelial cells (Figure 1). Furthermore, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis confirmed the presence of WSSV-like particles in the sub-cuticular epithelial cells (Figure 2). In contrast, no specific bacterial pathogen was observed in the VpAHPND-infected sample.

4. Discussion

In this study, among 12 identified pathogens posing a threat to prawns, VpAHPND and WSSV were detected; however, the infectious nature of these pathogens was not confirmed. The failure to confirm infectivity is presumed to be due to the degradation of viral genes or envelope proteins caused by repeated freezing/thawing or prolonged storage under frozen conditions. Among the hazardous factors analyzed in this study, it has been reported that VpAHPND failed to cause infection after infected shrimp were frozen and re-infected [23]. In contrast, IHHNV maintained its infectivity even after repeated freezing/thawing cycles of infected tissues [24,25,26], and for WSSV, multiple studies have shown that it retains infectivity under freezing conditions ranging from −20 to −70 °C [27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. However, no infectivity was detected in the WSSV detected in this study. To demonstrate this, histopathological and ultramicroscopic analyses were performed, revealing severe tissue necrosis and the inability to determine the shape of VpAHPND. Moreover, the particles suspected to be WSSV were not intact.
In this study, some cases of co-infection involving VpAHPND and WSSV were observed. Such co-infections are a common phenomenon in natural environments and can induce synergistic or antagonistic reactions within the host [34,35,36,37,38]. From the perspectives of quarantine and disease control, heightened management may be necessary in cases where interactions between endemic diseases prevalent domestically and those that could have entered from abroad are anticipated to be lethal to the hosts. In particular, co-infections involving pathogens known to inhibit host growth (such as IHHNV or EHP) and those capable of causing higher mortality rates (or prevalence) during juvenile stages (such as YHV1) can inflict significant damage on aquaculture facilities or natural environments [26,39,40].
Nevertheless, given the high proportion of detected cases and the timing of the sampling period coinciding with the global economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a risk of exposure to the domestic market while maintaining pathogenicity if the popularity of leisure activities such as fishing increases, leading to greater consumption and increased imports with a simplified distribution process. Therefore, despite the unconfirmed infectiousness, the risks associated with exposure to aquatic products (bait and feed) remain significant. Moreover, it is necessary to exercise greater caution with fishing bait or feed as they are directly exposed to the water, leading to the risk of disease transmission. In Australia, there have been cases of WSSV infection caused by imported shrimp intended for human consumption, underscoring the urgent need for measures to prevent misuse [7]. Furthermore, instances of disease transmission resulting from such changes in land use have been a consistent concern raised in recent years [3].
Particular attention is required for fishing (paste) bait, as it can directly transmit pathogens to susceptible hosts. Moreover, in South Korea, there are no separate processing standards or regulations for seafood products intended for bait or feed, which may lead to the possibility of infection through waste disposal. The importation of designated quarantine inspection materials is regulated by law, allowing imports only from places where there are frozen storage facilities for carcasses or waste (Article 35, Enforcement Regulation of the Aquatic Organism Disease Control Act). Therefore, it is necessary to establish policies that encourage the installation of such facilities not only in fishing gear stores but also in aquaculture facilities.
Repetitive freezing/thawing is an unavoidable process in the distribution of commercial seafood products and can also be considered as one of the methods for inactivating pathogens that can be presented as an imported hygiene condition. However, many regulatory/realistic issues need to be addressed to track or demonstrate freezing/thawing. Therefore, it may be possible to assume that there is no pathological activity for specific pathogens, by supporting the research results that state the loss of pathogenicity after a certain period of frozen storage, ranging from a few hours to several days, and proving that it has been stored frozen for a certain period. Such data will be important information for export/import inspections. Therefore, future studies will investigate the inactivation period of diseases identified as risk factors in this study under frozen conditions.

5. Conclusions

We detected VpAHPND and WSSV in fishing bait that was not subject to quarantine measures in South Korea. However, their infectivity was not confirmed, and this was presumed to be due to repeated freezing/thawing cycles or prolonged freezing/refrigeration storage. Histopathological and ultramicroscopic analysis revealed collapsed viral particles, which were suspected to be WSSV. Although infectivity was not confirmed in this study, the importation of aquatic products infected with pathogens without undergoing separate quarantine measures into South Korea is highly risky. Therefore, there is a need to perform quarantine measures on such non-quarantine-targeted aquatic products, and additional research is required to establish import hygiene conditions such as freezing and heating.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens12101228/s1, Table S1. Primers and PCR conditions used in this study; Table S2. Results of the hazard identification of fishing baits. References [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.K.; methodology, G.K.; software, G.K.; validation, G.K.; formal analysis, G.K., W.-S.W., K.-H.K., H.-J.S. and M.-Y.S.; investigation, G.K.; resources, H.J.K., Y.-O.K., D.-G.K., E.M.K. and E.S.N.; data curation, G.K.; writing—original draft preparation, G.K.; writing—review and editing, C.-I.P.; visualization, G.K.; supervision, C.-I.P.; project administration, C.-I.P.; funding acquisition, H.J.K., Y.-O.K., D.-G.K., E.M.K. and E.S.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Institute of Fisheries Science, Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries, Korea, grant number R2023019.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental protocols followed the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Gyeongsang National University (approval number: GNU-201007-E0070).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WTO; SPS. G/SPS/N/KOR/692. Available online: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-DP.aspx?language=E&HasEnglishRecord=True&HasFrenchRecord=True&HasSpanishRecord=True&CatalogueIdList=265503,265504,265505,265110,265020,265023,264848,264849,264837,264776&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=3&FullTextHash=371857150 (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  2. WTO; SPS. G/SPS/N/TPKM/531. Available online: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-DP.aspx?language=E&CatalogueIdList=264269,264195,264036,263563,263350,263356,263359,263112,263053,263055&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=1&FullTextHash=1&HasEnglishRecord=True&HasFrenchRecord=True&HasSpanishRecord=True (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  3. Flegel, T.W. Review of disease transmission risks from prawn products exported for human consumption. Aquaculture 2009, 290, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, D.-H. Low-value fish used as feed is a source of disease in farmed fish. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2015, 18, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qiu, L.; Dong, X.; Wan, X.Y.; Huang, J. Analysis of iridescent viral disease of shrimp (SHID) in 2017. In Analysis of Important Diseases of Aquatic Animals in China in 2017; Fishery and Fishery Administration Bureau under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Fishery Technical Extension Center, Ed.; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2018; pp. 187–204. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Ramos, P. Parasites in fishery products—Laboratorial and educational strategies to control. Exp. Parasitol. 2020, 211, 107865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. 2022. Available online: https://www.outbreak.gov.au/current-responses-to-outbreaks/white-spot-disease (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  8. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. Review of the Biosecurity Risks of Prawns Imported from All Countries for Human Consumption-Final Report; Canberra, Australia. 2023. Available online: agriculture.gov.au (accessed on 1 August 2023).
  9. The Fish Site. Vietnam on Alrert for Decapod Iridescent Virus. 2020. Available online: https://thefishsite.com/articles/vietnam-on-alert-for-decapod-iridescent-virus (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  10. Ko, J.-Y.; Seul, D.-E.; Kim, S.-H.; Magollah, T.M.; Kwak, M.-G.; Song, T.-W.; Lee, Y.-B. Manufacture optimization and quality evaluation of artificial fishing lures. In Proceedings of the Academic Conference of Aquaculture Division of Korean Society of Fisheries Science, Online, 4–6 November 2020; p. 274. Available online: https://www.dbpia.co.kr/pdf/pdfView.do?nodeId=NODE09380505 (accessed on 1 March 2023). (In Korean).
  11. KOSIS. Available online: https://kosis.kr/index/index.do (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  12. Sritunyalucksana, K.; Apisawetakan, S.; Boon-Nat, A.; Withyachumnarnkul, B.; Flegel, T.W. A new RNA virus found in black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon from Thailand. Virus Res. 2006, 118, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Prakasha, B.K.; Ramakrishna, R.P.; Karunasagar, I.; Karunasagar, I. Detection of Laem-Singh virus (LSNV) in cultured Penaeus monodon from India. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2007, 77, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Q.; Liu, Q.; Liu, S.; Yang, H.; Liu, S.; Zhu, L.; Yang, B.; Jin, J.; Ding, L.; Wang, X.; et al. A new nodavirus is associated with covert mortality disease of shrimp. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 2700–2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qiu, L.; Chen, M.-M.; Wan, X.-Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, Q.-L.; Wang, R.-Y.; Cheng, D.-Y.; Dong, X.; Yang, B.; Wang, X.-H.; et al. Characterization of a new member of Iridoviridae, shrimp hemocyte iridescent virus (SHIV), found in white leg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, S.C.; Choi, S.-K.; Han, S.-H.; Park, S.; Jeon, H.J.; Lee, S.C.; Kim, K.Y.; Lee, Y.S.; Kim, J.H.; Han, J.E. Detection of infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus and white spot syndrome virus in whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) imported from Vietnam to South Korea. J. Vet. Sci. 2020, 21, e31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sarri, C.; Stamatis, C.; Sarafidou, T.; Galara, I.; Godosopoulos, V.; Kolovos, M.; Liakou, C.; Tastsoglou, S.; Mamuris, Z. A new set of 16S rRNA universal primers for identification of animal species. Food Control 2014, 43, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. WOAH. Infection with White Spot Syndrome Virus (Version Adopted in 2018). In Manual of Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals 2022; World Organisation for Animal Health: Paris, France, 2022; Available online: https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/aahm/current/2.2.08_WSSV.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2023).
  19. Trang, T.T.; Hung, N.H.; Ninh, N.H.; Nguyen, N.H. Selection for improved white spot syndrome virus resistance increased larval survival and growth rate of Pacific whiteleg shrimp, Liptopenaeus vannamei. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2019, 166, 107219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cruz-Flores, R.; Mai, H.N.; Kanrar, S.; Aranguren-Caro, L.F.; Dhar, A.K. Genome reconstruction of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) from archival Davidson’s-fixed paraffin embedded shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) tissue. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Janewanthanakul, S.; Supungul, P.; Tang, S.; Tassanakajon, A. Heat shock protein 70 from Litopenaeus vannamei (LvHSP70) is involved in the innate immune response against white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) infection. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2020, 102, 103476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hasson, K.W.; Fan, Y.; Reisinger, T.; Venuti, J.; Varner, P.W. White-spot syndrome virus (WSSV) introduction into the Gulf of Mexico and Texas freshwater systems through imported, frozen bait-shrimp. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2006, 71, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tran, L.; Nunan, L.; Redman, R.M.; Lightner, D.V.; Fitzsimmons, K. EMS/AHPNS: Infectious disease caused by bacteria. Glob. Aquac. Advocate 2013, 20, 18–20. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lightner, D.V.; Mohney, L.L.; Williams, R.R.; Redman, R.M. Glycerol tolerance of IHHN virus of penaeid shrimp. J. World Aquac. Soc. 1987, 18, 196–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lightner, D.V.; Redman, R.M.; Arce, S.; Moss, S.M. Specific pathogen-free (SPF) shrimp stocks in shrimp farming facilities as a novel method for disease control in crustaceans. In Shellfish Safety and Quality; Shumway, S., Rodrick, G., Eds.; Woodhead Publishers: London, UK, 2009; pp. 384–424. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lightner, D.V. Epizootiology, distribution and the impact on international trade of two penaeid shrimp viruses in the Americas. Rev. Sci. Tech. L’office Int. Epizoot. 1996, 15, 579–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lightner, D.V.; Redman, R.M.; Poulos, B.T.; Nunan, L.M.; Mari, J.L.; Hasson, K.W. Risk of spread of penaeid shrimp viruses in the Americas by the international movement of live and frozen shrimp. Rev. Sci. Tech. L’office Int. Epizoot. 1997, 16, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, C.S.; Tang, K.F.J.; Kou, G.H.; Chen, S.N. Light and electron microscopic evidence of white spot disease in the giant tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon (Fabricius), and the kuruma shrimp, Penaeus japonicus (Bate), cultured in Taiwan. J. Fish Dis. 1997, 20, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Q.; White, B.L.; Redman, R.M.; Lightner, D.V. Per os challenge of Litopenaeus vannamei postlarvae and Farfantepenaeus duorarum juveniles with six geographic isolates of white spot syndrome virus. Aquaculture 1999, 170, 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nunan, L.M.; Poulos, B.T.; Lightner, D.V. The detection of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and yellow head virus (YHV) in imported commodity shrimp. Aquaculture 1998, 160, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. John, K.R.; George, M.R.; Iyappan, T.; Thangarani, A.J.; Jeyaseelan, M.J.P. Indian isolates of white spot syndrome virus exhibit variations in their pathogenicity and genomic tandem repeats. J. Fish Dis. 2010, 33, 749–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Reddy, D.A.; Jeyasekaran, G.; Jeya, S.R. Incidence of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) in Indian farmed frozen shrimp products and testing for viability through bio-inoculation studies. J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2010, 1, 102. [Google Scholar]
  33. Aranguren, L.F.C.; Mai, H.N.; Nunan, L.; Lin, J.; Noble, B.; Dhar, A.K. Assessment of transmission risk in WSSV-infected shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei upon cooking. J. Fish Dis. 2020. epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Otta, S.K.; Arulraj, R.; Ezhil Praveena, P.; Manivel, R.; Panigrahi, A.; Bhuvaneswari, T.; Ravichandran, P.; Jithendran, K.P.; Ponniah, A.G. Association of dual viral infection with mortality of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in culture ponds in India. Virusdisease 2014, 25, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kotob, M.H.; Menanteau-Ledouble, S.; Kumar, G.; Abdelzaher, M.; El-Matbouli, M. The impact of co-infections on fish: A review. Vet. Res. 2017, 47, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kotob, M.H.; Gorgoglione, B.; Kumar, G.; Abdelzaher, M.; Saleh, M.; El-Matbouli, M. The impact of Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae and Myxobolus cerebralis co-infections on pathology in rainbow trout. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tang, K.F.; Durand, S.V.; White, B.L.; Redman, R.M.; Mohney, L.L.; Lightner, D.V. Induced resistance to white spot syndrome virus infection in Penaeus stylirostris through pre-infection with infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus—A preliminary study. Aquaculture 2003, 216, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kotob, M.H.; Kumar, G.; Saleh, M.; Gorgoglione, B.; Abdelzaher, M.; El-Matbouli, M. Differential modulation of host immune genes in the kidney and cranium of the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in response to Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae and Myxobolus cerebralis co-infections. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rai, P.; Pradeep, B.; Karunasagar, I.; Karunasagar, I. Detection of viruses in Penaeus monodon from India showing signs of slow growth syndrome. Aquaculture 2009, 289, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lotz, J.M. Special topic review: Viruses, biosecurity and specific pathogen-free stocks in shrimp aquaculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 13, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jaroenlak, P.; Sanguanrut, P.; Williams, B.A.P.; Stentiford, G.D.; Flegel, T.W.; Sritunyalucksana, K.; Itsathitphaisarn, O. A nested PCR assay to avoid false positive detection of the microsporidian Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) in environmental samples in shrimp farms. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tang, K.F.; Redman, R.M.; Pantoja, C.R.; Groumellec, M.L.; Duraisamy, P.; Lightner, D.V. Identification of an iridovirus in Acetes erythraeus (Sergestidae) and the development of in situ hybridization and PCR method for its detection. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2007, 96, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Poulos, B.T.; Lightner, D.V. Detection of infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV) of penaeid shrimp by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Dis. Aquat. Org. 2006, 73, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aranguren, L.F.; Tang, K.F.J.; Lightner, D.V. Quantification of the bacterial agent of necrotizing hepatopancreatitis (NHP-B) by real-time PCR and comparison of survival and NHP load of two shrimp populations. Aquaculture 2010, 307, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dangtip, S.; Sirikharin, R.; Sanguanrut, P.; Thitamadee, S.; Sritunyalucksana, K.; Taengchaiyaphum, S.; Mavichak, R.; Proespraiwong, P.; Flegel, T.W. AP4 method for two-tube nested PCR detection of AHPND isolates of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Aquac. Rep. 2015, 2, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lo, C.F.; Ho, C.H.; Peng, S.E.; Chen, C.H.; Hsu, H.C.; Chiu, Y.L.; Chang, C.F.; Liu, K.F.; Su, M.S.; Wang, C.H.; et al. White spot syndrome baculovirus (WSBV) detected in cultured and captured shrimp, crabs and other arthropods. Dis. Aquat. Org. 1996, 27, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yoganandhan, K.; Sri Widada, J.; Bonami, J.R.; Sahul Hameed, A.S. Simultaneous detection of Macrobrachium rosenbergii nodavirus and extra small virus by a single tube, one-step multiplex RT-PCR assay. J. Fish Dis. 2005, 28, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. WOAH. Infection with yellow head virus genotype 1 (Version Adopted in 2019). In Manual of Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals 2022; World Organisation for Animal Health: Paris, France, 2022; Available online: https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/aahm/current/2.2.09_YHD.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  49. Flegel, T.W. Historic emergence, impact and current status of shrimp pathogens in Asia. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2012, 110, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lightner, D.V.; Redman, R.M.; Pantoja, C.; Noble, B.L.; Tran, L. Early mortality syndrome affects shrimp in Asia. Glob. Aquac. Advocate 2012, 40. Available online: https://www.globalseafood.org/advocate/early-mortality-syndrome-affects-shrimp-in-asia/ (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  51. Tran, L.; Nunan, L.; Redman, R.M.; Mohney, L.L.; Pantoja, C.R.; Fitzsimmons, K.; Lightner, D.V. Determination of the infectious nature of the agent of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis syndrome affecting penaeid shrimp. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2013, 105, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kondo, H.; Van, P.T.; Dang, L.T.; Hirono, I. Draft genome sequence of non-Vibrio parahaemolyticus acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease strain KC13.17.5, isolated from diseased shrimp in Vietnam. Genome Announc. 2015, 3, e00978-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lee, C.T.; Chen, I.T.; Yang, Y.T.; Ko, T.P.; Huang, Y.T.; Huang, J.Y.; Huang, M.F.; Lin, S.J.; Chen, C.Y.; Lin, S.S.; et al. The opportunistic marine pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus becomes virulent by acquiring a plasmid that expresses a deadly toxin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 10798–10803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dong, X.; Wang, H.; Zou, P.; Chen, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Huang, J. Complete genome sequence of Vibrio campbellii strain 20130629003S01 isolated from shrimp with acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease. Gut Pathog. 2017, 9, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Eshik, M.E.; Abedin, M.; Punom, N.; Begum, M.K.; Rahman, M.S. Molecular Identification of AHPND positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus causing an outbreak in South-West shrimp farming regions of Bangladesh. J. Bangladesh Acad. Sci. 2018, 41, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Megahed, M.E. Quantitative genetics of disease resistance in different groups of Penaeus semisulcatus from preliminary controlled challenge test with Vibrio parahaemolyticus the aetiological agent of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND). J. Appl. Aquac. 2018, 1–17, epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
  57. Nunan, L.M.; Pantoja, C.R.; Gomez-Jimenez, S.; Lightner, D.V. “Candidatus Hepatobacter penaei”, an intracellular pathogenic enteric bacterium in the hepatopancreas of the marine shrimp Penaeus vannamei (Crustacea: Decapoda). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 1407–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hudson, D.A.; Hudson, N.B.; Pyecroft, S.B. Mortalities of Penaeus japonicus prawns associated with microsporidean infection. Aust. Vet. J. 2001, 79, 504–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tourtip, S.; Wongtripop, S.; Stentiford, G.D.; Bateman, K.S.; Sriurairatana, S.; Chavadej, J.; Sritunyalucksana, K.; Withyachumnarnkul, B. Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei sp. nov. (Microsporida: Enterocytozoonidae), a parasite of the black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon (Decapoda: Penaeidae): Fine structure and phylogenetic relationships. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2009, 102, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Thitamadee, S.; Prachumwat, A.; Srisala, J.; Jaroenlak, P.; Salachan, P.V.; Sritunyalucksana, K.; Flegel, T.W.; Itsathitphaisarn, O. Review of current disease threats for cultivated penaeid shrimp in Asia. Aquaculture 2016, 452, 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Aranguren, L.F.; Han, J.E.; Tang, K.F.J. Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) is a risk factor for acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND) and septic hepatopancreatic necrosis (SHPN) in the Pacific white shrimp Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 2017, 471, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Salachan, P.V.; Jaroenlak, P.; Thitamadee, S.; Itsathitphaisarn, O.; Sritunyalucksana, K. Laboratory cohabitation challenge model for shrimp hepatopancreatic microsporidiosis (HPM) caused by Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP). BMC Vet. Res. 2017, 13, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tang, K.F.J.; Aranguren, L.F.; Piamsomboon, P.; Han, J.E.; Maskaykina, I.Y.; Schmidt, M.M. Detection of the microsporidian Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) and Taura syndrome virus in Penaeus vannamei cultured in Venezuela. Aquaculture 2017, 480, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ma, B.; Yu, H.T.; Fang, J.B.; Sun, C.; Zhang, M. Employing DNA binding dye to improve detection of Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei in real-time LAMP. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kim, B.S.; Jang, G.I.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, Y.S.; Jeon, Y.G.; Oh, Y.K.; Hwang, J.Y.; Kwon, M.G. First report of Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei infection in Pacific whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) cultured in Korea. Animals 2021, 11, 3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhang, Q.; Xu, T.; Wan, X.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Dong, X.; Yang, B.; Huang, J. Prevalence and distribution of covert mortality nodavirus (CMNV) in cultured crustacean. Virus Res. 2017, 233, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Zhang, Q.; Liu, S.; Li, J.; Xu, T.T.; Wang, X.H.; Fu, G.M.; Li, X.P.; Sang, S.W.; Bian, X.D.; Hao, J.W. Evidence for cross-species transmission of covert mortality nodavirus to new host of Mugilogobius abei. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1447. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01447 (accessed on 1 March 2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wang, C.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Hao, J.; Tang, K.F.J.; Zhang, Q. Infection of covert mortality nodavirus in Japanese flounder reveals host jump of the emerging alphanodavirus. J. Gen. Virol. 2018, 100, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xu, L.; Wang, T.; Li, F.; Yang, F. Isolation and preliminary characterization of a new pathogenic iridovirus from redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2016, 120, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, F.; Xu, L.; Yang, F. Genomic characterization of a novel iridovirus from redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus: Evidence for a new genus within the family Iridoviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 2589–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Qiu, L.; Chen, M.-M.; Wan, X.-Y.; Zhang, Q.-L.; Li, C.; Dong, X.; Yang, B.; Huang, J. Detection and quantification of shrimp hemocyte iridescent virus by TaqMan probe based real-time PCR. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2018, 154, 95–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Qiu, L.; Chen, M.M.; Wang, R.Y.; Wan, X.Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, Q.L.; Dong, X.; Yang, B.; Xiang, J.H.; Huang, J. Complete genome sequence of shrimp hemocyte iridescent virus (SHIV) isolated from white leg shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Arch. Virol. 2018, 163, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Qiu, L.; Chen, X.; Zhao, R.; Li, C.; Gao, W.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, J. First description of a natural infection with shrimp hemocyte iridescent virus in farmed giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Viruses 2019, 11, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ramsden, N.; Smith, J. Clarification: Shrimp Disease SHIV Detected in China, Thailand, but Not Vietnam. Undercurrent News, 2018. Available online: https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2018/10/01/clarification-shrimp-disease-shiv-detected-in-chinathailand-but-not-vietnam/(accessed on 1 February 2023).
  75. Chen, X.; Qiu, L.; Wang, H.; Zou, P.; Dong, X.; Li, F.; Huang, J. Susceptibility of Exopalaemon carinicauda to the infection with shrimp hemocyte iridescent virus. Viruses 2019, 11, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chung, J. Sixteen shrimp farms infected with DIV1: Agriculture council. In Taipei Times; Taipei Times: Taipei, Taiwan, 2020; Available online: https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2020/06/19/2003738488 (accessed on 1 February 2023).
  77. Lightner, D.V.; Redman, R.M. Shrimp diseases and current diagnostic methods. Aquaculture 1998, 164, 201–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rai, P.; Safeena, M.P.; Krabsetsve, K.; La Fauce, K.; Owens, L.; Karunasagar, I. Genomics, molecular epidemiology and diagnostics of infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus. Indian J. Virol. 2012, 23, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Bateman, K.S.; Stentiford, G.D. A taxonomic review of viruses infecting crustaceans with an emphasis on wild hosts. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2017, 147, 86–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Srisala, J.; Thaiue, D.; Sanguanrut, P.; Aldama-Cano, D.J.; Flegel, T.W.; Sritunyalucksana, K. Potential universal PCR method to detect decapod hepanhamaparvovirus (DHPV) in crustaceans. Aquaculture 2021, 541, 736782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tang, K.F.J.; Pantoja, C.R.; Lightner, D.V. Infectious myonecrosis virus infection in Litopenaeus vannamei, Litopenaeus stylirostris, and Penaeus monodon. In Aquaculture America 2005: Shrimp Growout, Nutrition and Disease; World Aquaculture Society: New Orleans, LA, USA, 2005; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  82. Coelho, M.G.L.; Silva, A.C.G.; Vila Nova, C.M.V.; Neto, J.M.O.; Lima, A.C.N.; Feijó, R.G.; Apolinário, D.F.; Maggioni, R.; Gesteira, T.C.V. Susceptibility of the wild southern brown shrimp (Farfantepenaeus subtilis) to infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis (IHHN) and infectious myonecrosis (IMN). Aquaculture 2009, 294, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sahul Hameed, A.S.; Abdul Majeed, S.; Vimal, S.; Madan, N.; Rajkumar, T.; Santhoshkumar, S.; Sivakumar, S. Studies on the occurrence of infectious myonecrosis virus in pond-reared Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in India. J. Fish Dis. 2017, 40, 1823–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sittidilokratna, N.; Dangtip, S.; Sritunyalucksana, K.; Babu, R.; Pradeep, B.; Mohan, C.V.; Gudkovs, N.; Walker, P.J. Detection of Laem-Singh virus in cultured Penaeus monodon shrimp from several sites in the IndoPacific region. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2009, 84, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Panphut, W.; Senapin, S.; Sriurairatana, S.; Withyachumnarnkul, B.; Flegel, T.W. A novel integrase-containing element may interact with laem-singh virus (LSNV) to cause slow growth in giant tiger shrimp. BMC Vet. Res. 2011, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Poornima, M.; Seetang-Nun, Y.; Alavandi, S.V.; Dayal, J.S. Laem-Singh virus: A probable etiological agent associated with monodon slow growth syndrome in farmed black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Indian J. Virol. 2012, 23, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Shi, M.; Lin, X.; Tian, J.; Chen, L.; Chen, X.; Li, C.; Qin, X.; Li, J.; Cao, J.; Eden, J.; et al. Redefining the invertebrate RNA virosphere. Nature 2016, 540, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Taengchaiyaphum, S.; Srisala, J.; Sanguanrut, P.; Ongvarrasopone, C.; Flegel, T.W.; Sritunyalucksana, K. Full genome characterization of Laem Singh virus (LSNV) in shrimp Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture 2021, 538, 736533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Brock, J.A. Taura syndrome, a disease important to shrimp farms in the Americas. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 13, 415–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jimenez, R.; Barniol, R.; de Barniol, L.; Machuca, M.; Romero, X. Viral-like particles associated with cuticular epithelium necrosis in cultured Litopenaeus vannamei (Decapoda: Crustacea) in Ecuador. Aquac. Res. 2000, 31, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Inouye, K.; Miwa, S.; Oseko, N.; Nakano, H.; Kimura, T.; Momoyama, K.; Hiraoka, M. Mass mortalities of cultured kuruma shrimp Penaeus japonicus in Japan in 1993: Electron microscopic evidence of the causative virus. Fish Pathol. 1994, 29, 149–158. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Takahashi, Y.; Itami, T.; Kondo, M.; Maeda, M.; Fuji, R.; Tomonaga, S.; Supamattaya, K.; Boonyaratpalin, S. Electron microscopic evidence of bacilliform virus infection in kuruma shrimp (Penaeus japonicus). Fish Pathol. 1994, 29, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wongteerasupaya, C.; Wongwisansri, S.; Boonsaeng, V.; Panyim, S.; Pratanpipat, P.; Nash, G.L.; Withyachumnarnkul, B.; Flegel, T.W. DNA fragment of Penaeus monodon baculovirus PmNOBII gives positive in situ hybridization with white-spot viral infections in six penaeid shrimp species. Aquaculture 1996, 143, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lightner, D.V.; Hasson, K.W.; White, B.L.; Redman, R.M. Experimental infection of Western hemisphere penaeid shrimp with Asian white spot syndrome virus and Asian yellow head virus. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 1998, 10, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. van Hulten, M.C.W.; Witteveldt, J.; Peters, S.; Kloosterboer, N.; Tarchini, R.; Fiers, M.; Sandbrink, H.; Lankhorst, R.; Vlak, J.M. The white spot syndrome virus DNA genome sequence. Virology 2001, 286, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yang, F.; He, J.; Lin, X.; Li, Q.; Pan, D.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X. Complete genome sequence of the shrimp white spot bacilliform virus. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 11811–11820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sudhakaran, R.; Syed Musthaq, S.; Haribabu, P.; Mukherjee, S.C.; Gopal, C.; Sahul Hameed, A.S. Experimental transmission of Macrobrachium rosenbergii nodavirus (MrNV) and extra small virus (XSV) in three species of marine shrimp (Penaeus indicus, Penaeus japonicus and Penaeus monodon). Aquaculture 2006, 257, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ravi, M.; Nazeer Basha, A.; Sarathi, M.; Rosa Idalia, H.H.; Sri Widada, J.; Bonami, J.R.; Sahul Hameed, A.S. Studies on the occurrence of white tail disease (WTD) caused by MrNV and XSV in hatchery-reared postlarvae of Penaeus indicus and P. monodon. Aquaculture 2009, 292, 117–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Pillai, D.; Bonami, J.R. A review on the diseases of freshwater prawns with special focus on white tail disease of Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquac. Res. 2012, 43, 1029–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Senapin, S.; Jaengsanong, C.; Phiwsaiya, K.; Prasertsri, S.; Laisutisan, K.; Chuchird, N.; Limsuwan, C.; Flegel, T.W. Infections of MrNV (Macrobrachium rosenbergii nodavirus) in cultivated whiteleg shrimp Penaeus vannamei in Asia. Aquaculture 2012, 338–341, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kibenge, F.S.B.; Godoy, M.G. Aquaculture Virology, 1st ed.; Elsevier Inc.: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  102. Murwantoko, M.; Bimantara, A.; Roosmanto, R.; Kawaichi, M. Macrobrachium rosenbergii nodavirus infection in a giant freshwater prawn hatchery in Indonesia. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gangnonngiw, W.; Bunnontae, M.; Phiwsaiya, K.; Senapin, S.; Dhar, A.K. In experimental challenge with infectious clones of Macrobrachium rosenbergii nodavirus (MrNV) and extra small virus (XSV), MrNV alone can cause mortality in freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii). Virology 2020, 540, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Chayaburakul, K.; Nash, G.; Pratanpipat, P.; Sriurairatana, S.; Withyachumnarnkul, B. Multiple pathogens found in growth-retarded black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon cultivated in Thailand. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2004, 60, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Flegel, T.W.; Nielsen, L.; Thamavit, V.; Kongtim, S.; Pasharawipas, T. Presence of multiple viruses in non-diseased, cultivated shrimp at harvest. Aquaculture 2004, 240, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Megahed, M.E.; Cruz-Flores, R.; Dhar, A.K. Complete genome sequences of four major viruses infecting marine shrimp in Egypt. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2018, 7, e00809-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pathogens 12 01228 g001
Figure 1. Histopathological results of the pathogen detected samples (a); necrotic lesions, presumed to be traces of inflammation (represented by a black circle), are observed in the VpAHPND infected sample (b); inclusion bodies are seen in presumed epithelial cells (indicated by black arrows) in the WSSV-infected sample. (H&E stain; scale bar = 50 μm).
Figure 1. Histopathological results of the pathogen detected samples (a); necrotic lesions, presumed to be traces of inflammation (represented by a black circle), are observed in the VpAHPND infected sample (b); inclusion bodies are seen in presumed epithelial cells (indicated by black arrows) in the WSSV-infected sample. (H&E stain; scale bar = 50 μm).
Pathogens 12 01228 g001
Pathogens 12 01228 g002
Figure 2. Ultramicroscopic results of the pathogen detected samples (a); WSSV-like particles are observed in the hamocyte (left; scale bar = 1 μm) (b); the sub-cuticular epithelial cell (right; scale bar = 200 nm) (indicated by red arrows).
Figure 2. Ultramicroscopic results of the pathogen detected samples (a); WSSV-like particles are observed in the hamocyte (left; scale bar = 1 μm) (b); the sub-cuticular epithelial cell (right; scale bar = 200 nm) (indicated by red arrows).
Pathogens 12 01228 g002
Table 1. Sampling locations and origins of fishing bait analyzed in this study.
Table 1. Sampling locations and origins of fishing bait analyzed in this study.
No.SamplesSampling LocationsOrigins
1Metapenaeus joyneri, Portunus trituberculatus, Uroteuthis duvauceliiJeonnamChina
2Eriocheir sinensisJeonnamChina
3Perinereis aibuhitensis, Marphysa sanguinea, Metapenaeus joyneri, Euphausia superbaJeonnamChina, Antarctic Ocean
4Perinereis aibuhitensis, Loliolus beka, Todarodes pacificus, Amphioctopus fangsiao, Palaemon orientis, Euphausia superba, Metapenaeus joyneri, Penaeus vannameiChungnamVietnam, Antarctic Ocean
5Loliolus bekaJeonnamChina
6Artemia franciscanaInternet MarketChina
7Perinereis aibuhitensis, Atrina pectinataJeonbukChina
8Artemia franciscanaChungnamUnited States
9Todarodes pacificusGyeongnamChina
10Penaeus vannamei, Euphausia superba, Perinereis aibuhitensisJejuChina, Antarctic Ocean
11Marphysa sanguinea, Penaeus vannamei, Metapenaeus joyneriGyeonggiChina
12Eriocheir sinensisJeonbukChina
13Perinereis aibuhitensis, Marphysa sanguineaJeonnamChina
14Perinereis aibuhitensis, Marphysa sanguinea, Dosidicus gigas, Euphausia superbaKangwonChina, Argentina, Antarctic Ocean
15Metapenaeus joyneri, Perinereis aibuhitensisGyeongbukChina
Table 2. The species and quantity of fishing bait investigated for pathogens confirmed as hazardous factors in this study.
Table 2. The species and quantity of fishing bait investigated for pathogens confirmed as hazardous factors in this study.
PhylumSpecies and Quantity
Crustacean11 of Portunus trituberculatus
159 of Metapenaeus joyneri
60 of Eriocheir sinensis
210 of Euphausia superba
30 of Palaemon orientis
104 of Penaeus vannamei
24 pooled samples * of Artemia franciscana
Semi-total574 samples of 7 species + 24 pooled samples *
Mollusks11 of Uroteuthis duvaucelii
20 of Loliolus beka
199 of Perinereis aibuhitensis
57 of Marphysa sanguinea
68 of Todarodes pacificus
10 of Amphioctopus fangsiao
1 of Atrina pectinata
18 of Dosidicus gigas
Semi-total384 animals of 8 species
Total1556 samples of 37 species (+ 24 pooled samples *)
* In the case of A. franciscana, since the sample size was tiny, a pooled sample of 0.1 g per section was prepared.
Table 3. The detailed sampling regions, species, origins, and disease prevalence of samples with positive molecular biological test results for pathogens confirmed as hazardous factors in this study.
Table 3. The detailed sampling regions, species, origins, and disease prevalence of samples with positive molecular biological test results for pathogens confirmed as hazardous factors in this study.
No.Detailed RegionSpeciesOriginPrevalence
1Jeonnam MokpoM. joyneriChina20% (6/30) of WSSV
2Jeonnam JindoP. vannameiVietnam100% (24/24) of WSSV
3Jeju HamdukP. vannameiVietnam100% (25/25) of WSSV and 28% (7/25) of VpAHPND
4Incheon GanghwaM. joyneriVietnam26.7% (8/30) of WSSV
5Incheon GanghwaP. vannameiVietnam100% (25/25) of WSSV
6Gyeongbuk UlginM. joyneriChina30% (9/30) of WSSV
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, G.; Woo, W.-S.; Kim, K.-H.; Son, H.-J.; Sohn, M.-Y.; Kong, H.J.; Kim, Y.-O.; Kim, D.-G.; Kim, E.M.; Noh, E.S.; et al. Identification of Potential Hazards Associated with South Korean Prawns and Monitoring Results Targeting Fishing Bait. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12101228

AMA Style

Kang G, Woo W-S, Kim K-H, Son H-J, Sohn M-Y, Kong HJ, Kim Y-O, Kim D-G, Kim EM, Noh ES, et al. Identification of Potential Hazards Associated with South Korean Prawns and Monitoring Results Targeting Fishing Bait. Pathogens. 2023; 12(10):1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12101228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Gyoungsik, Won-Sik Woo, Kyung-Ho Kim, Ha-Jeong Son, Min-Young Sohn, Hee Jeong Kong, Young-Ok Kim, Dong-Gyun Kim, Eun Mi Kim, Eun Soo Noh, and et al. 2023. "Identification of Potential Hazards Associated with South Korean Prawns and Monitoring Results Targeting Fishing Bait" Pathogens 12, no. 10: 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12101228

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop