Next Article in Journal
Bacillus simplex as the Most Probable Culprit of Penetrating Trauma Infection: A Case Report
Previous Article in Journal
COVID-19 Treatment—Current Status, Advances, and Gap
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clonal Dissemination of Multidrug-Resistant and Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Clonal Complex in a Chinese Hospital

1
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Bo’ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100068, China
2
Biomedical Innovation Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China
3
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China
4
Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2022, 11(10), 1202; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101202
Submission received: 28 September 2022 / Revised: 13 October 2022 / Accepted: 13 October 2022 / Published: 18 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)

Abstract

:
The emergence of high antimicrobial-resistant and hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKp) clones in clinics has become a cause of concern in recent years. Despite the global spread of the clonal complex (CC) 258, hvKp of other non-CC258 subgroups also emerged. Here, by performing a retrospective study from July 2019 to August 2020 in a Chinese hospital, we obtained 25 K. pneumoniae isolates belonging to CC15. By antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole genome sequencing and analysis, we obtained the resistant phenotypes and genotypes of these isolates. Twenty-one isolates (84%) were carbapenem-resistant, and eighteen were blaKPC-2 positive. In addition, ten isolates were identified as putative hvKp and seven were carbapenem-resistant hvKp. Nine isolates carried the pLVPK-like virulence plasmid, which contains the fragment including rmpA2, peg-589, iutA, and iucABCD. Another isolate carried iucA. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the isolates belonged to four lineages, and the putative hvKp isolates were identified in three of these. Two independent sublineages of putative hvKp were caused by the acquisition of pLVPK-like virulence plasmid. Based on comparative genomic analysis, the number of pairwise single nucleotide polymorphisms amongst the four sublineages, Lineage 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b, were 1–43, 2–13, 129–279, and 3–4, respectively, indicating clonal transmission of Lineage 1a, 1b, and 2b. These results indicate that multiple lineages of CC15 carbapenem-resistant hvKp have emerged in the hospital and caused nosocomial transmission, and that the spreading of virulence plasmids among classic K. pneumoniae subtypes might become more common and happen more easily. These findings highlight the importance of surveillance of local epidemics of non-CC258 subgroups in hospitals.

1. Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae, a clinically important Gram-negative bacterium [1], is one of the bacteria in the infamous ESKAPE group of superbugs most prevalent in healthcare settings and that causes a large number of healthcare-associated infection cases worldwide [2]. In addition to the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains (e.g., the clonal complex [CC] 258 including multilocus sequence type [ST] ST258, ST11, ST340, ST437, and ST512), the emergence of more and more hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (hvKp) clones in clinics has been cause of concern [3,4]. Previously, hvKp strains had been mostly isolated from the community-acquired infections cases, like liver abscess patients, and most were antimicrobial sensitive. However, the epidemiology of hvKp has been changing in recent years, together with its resistance phenotype [5].
In 2017, Gu et al. first reported the emergence of a ST11 hvKp clone presenting both hypervirulence and carbapenem resistance, which caused a fatal outbreak in a Chinese hospital [6]. Since then, this carbapenem-resistant hvKp (cr-hvKp) has spread worldwide. In addition, more and more hvKp subtypes have been reported in hospitals, including ST258, ST11, ST15, and ST23, and have commonly acquired high antimicrobial resistance [7]. In various regions of China, these subtypes have also become prevalent in hospitals [8]. These clinically prevalent hvKp commonly present high rates of antimicrobial resistance, which makes the clinical situation more complicated. In addition, a group of non-CC258 subtypes has been continually spreading in hospitals [9]. CC15, mainly consisting of ST14 and ST15, has become one of the most prevalent among the hvKp subtypes [10]. Among these subgroups, multiple drug resistance (MDR), and even extensive drug resistance, has become more and more common worldwide [3,4].
Therefore, the increasing prevalence of hvKp clones calls for continuous surveillance of this superbug in healthcare settings. In this study, we performed surveillance of nosocomial infections caused by K. pneumoniae and found that CC15 was the second prevalent subtype in our hospital. The genome sequences were obtained by whole genome sequencing (WGS), and the potential nosocomial transmission of the isolates and their genomic characteristics were explored. Notably, we found that multiple lineages of CC15 cr-hvKp had emerged in our hospital, suggesting that the spreading of virulence plasmids among classic K. pneumoniae (cKp) subtypes might become more common and happen more easily. These results highlight the importance of surveillance for the CC15 subtype.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain Collection

We performed a retrospective study from July 2019 to August 2020 in Beijing Bo’ai Hospital, a Class A tertiary hospital in Beijing, China. Strains were cultured on Columbia blood agar plate. The monoclonal strains were selected for identification by the Vitek compact 2 system. All of the K. pneumoniae strains were stored at −80 °C. Nosocomial infection cases were identified as previously described [5].

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to the 2020 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, using the following agents: Amikacin (AMK), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Imipenem (IPM), Levofloxacin (LEV), Tobramycin (TOB), Ampicillin (AMP), Ampicillin/Sulbactam (SAM), Aztreonam (ATM), Cefepime (FEP), Cefotetan (CTT), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Ceftriaxone (CRO), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP), and Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (SXT). The results were interpreted following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The strain presenting IPM resistance was defined as crKp. The MDR phenotype was defined as being resistant to three or more different classes of antimicrobial agents [5].

2.3. Whole Genome Sequencing, De Novo Assembly, and Annotation

The genomic DNA of all isolates was extracted with the TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (Cat. no. DP302, Tiangen, China), and then sequenced using the NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) by constructing paired-end libraries with an average insert size of 500 bp to obtain 150 bp reads. We used the fastQC software to obtain the clean data from the raw data and assembled the clean data with SPAdes v3.15.2 [11,12]. The draft genome sequences were subsequently annotated using Prokka [13].
The multi-locus sequence types and capsular types of the isolates were analyzed using Kelaborate [14]. Antimicrobial resistance genes, virulence genes, and plasmid replicon types were annotated by comparison with relevant databases, including ResFinder [15], Virulence Factor Database [16], ISfinder [17], and plasmidFinder [18], using the BLAST software [19]. We selected thresholds of 90% identity and minimum length coverage of 80% to identify antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes. The strains carrying at least one of the genes peg-344, iroB, iucA, rmpA, and rmpA2 were defined as putative hvKp, while others as cKp.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

As part of our phylogenetic analysis, the sequencing reads were mapped to the reference sequence of K. pneumoniae strain BR (ST15, accession no.: CP015990) using Bowtie 2 v2.2.8 (https://github.com/BenLangmead/bowtie2, accessed on 10 October 2022), and the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed with Samtools v1.9 and combined using the iSNV-calling pipeline (https://github.com/generality/iSNV-calling, accessed on 10 October, 2022) we previously constructed. High-quality SNPs supported by more than five reads of mapping quality >20 were retained. The recombination sites were subsequently detected by Gubbins [20]. The concatenated sequences of filtered polymorphic sites conserved in all the Kp strains (core genome SNPs, cgSNPs) were used to perform phylogenetic analysis using the maximum likelihood method by IQ-Tree [21].

2.5. Data Availability

All sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under accession number PRJNA881845.

3. Results

3.1. Sources of CC15 K. pneumoniae Isolates and Their Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles

We identified 25 non-repetitive CC15 Kp isolates during the one-year monitoring of our hospital (Figure 1). CC15 was the second prevalent subgroup after CC258. The isolates were obtained from 22 patients hospitalized in six wards, of which there were 18 males and 4 females, with a median age of 66 (IQR: 44–80). The samples from which the isolates were cultured were sputum (8 isolates), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (7 isolates), urine (7 isolates), blood (1 isolate), pleural fluid (1 isolate) and secretion (1 isolate).
Subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, the isolates displayed resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobials, including IPM (resistance rate: 84%), CAZ (96%), FEP (84%), and LEV (96%) (Table 1). Among the isolates, all were identified as MDR and 21 were carbapenem-resistant. In addition, ten isolates were identified as putative hvKp based on the presence of virulence genes, and seven were cr-hvKp.

3.2. Phylogenetic Relationships of CC15 K. pneumoniae in Our Hospital

To assess the phylogenetic relationship of the CC15 isolates, we constructed a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 13,140 cgSNPs. We identified four lineages, two of which (Lineage 3 and Lineage 4) included only one isolate (Figure 1). The other two lineages (Lineage 1 and Lineage 2) included, respectively, seventeen and six isolates. Lineage 1 and 2 could be further divided into two sublineages each: Lineage 1a (10 isolates), 1b (7), 2a (3) and 2b (3). These results indicate the existence of clonal transmission of different lineages among different wards of our hospital.

3.3. Nosocomial Reservation and Transmission of CC15 Lineages

The isolates were obtained from patients hospitalized in different wards, and the infections are likely to have been caused by different transmission events. In order to discover the relationships of the lineages we calculated the genetic differences. The number of pairwise cgSNP differences amongst the four sublineages, Lineage 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b, were respectively 1-43, 2-13, 129-279 and 3-4. In addition, by performing a phylogenetic analysis with 665 published CC15 genomes, we found that isolates of Lineage 1a, 1b, and 2b still appear clustered (Figure S1). These results indicate clonal transmission of at least the three sublineages Lineage 1a, 1b, and 2b in our hospital (Figure 2). Based on the SNP pattern, we estimated the evolutionary history of the isolates in these sublineages. The potential intermediate nodes were estimated based on the shared SNPs.
Lineage 1a isolates spread in ten months in five wards: the department of respiratory medicine, the intensive care unit, the departments of neurological rehabilitation 1 and 2, and the department of neurosurgery. During the ten months, five of the nine patients from which the isolates were obtained were hospitalized in four departments, from which no direct epidemiological links were discovered. The seven Lineage 1b isolates were obtained from the department of respiratory medicine in eight months, and the three Lineage 2b isolates were obtained from two patients hospitalized in different wards in a time interval of four months. The cgSNP differences between the isolates and estimated intermediate nodes were mostly fewer than ten. These results indicate that there might not have been direct transmission between patients with no epidemiological links. The CC15 clones might instead spread widely and remain in the medical environment, or be carried by asymptomatic patients, and only cause infections occasionally. In addition, from three patients, we obtained two isolates from separate samples from different body systems (Figure 2). The isolates obtained from the same patients belonged to the same sublineage, and differed for 1, 3, and 6 cgSNPs from each other. These results demonstrate the intra-host variation of these sublineages and the potential intra-host transmission between different body parts.

3.4. Prevalence of Virulence Genes, Resistance Genes, and Plasmid Types

Resistance genes conferring resistance to at least four classes of antimicrobials were identified among all of the 25 CC15 isolates, in line with the MDR phenotype. Resistance genes including fosA (conferring resistance to fosfomycin), oqxA, and oqxB (conferring resistance to fluoroquinolone) were identified in all of the isolates (Figure 1). The genes encoding beta-lactamases were also prevalent, including blaSHV-28, present in 24 isolates, and blaTEM-1B, present in 21 isolates. The gene blaKPC-2 (conferring resistance to carbapenems) was harbored by eighteen isolates, including sixteen of the seventeen Lineage 1 isolates, the two Lineage 3, and Lineage 4 isolates. All of the six Lineage 2 isolates were blaKPC-2-negative and susceptible to carbapenems. Several other resistance genes were also present in specific lineages, for instance blaCTX-M-15 was mostly present in Lineage 2 and Lineage 1a, blaOXA-1 was only harbored by Lineage 1a, and aac(6′)-IId and blaOXA-232 were only found in Lineage 2b.
At least one of the five virulence genes peg-344, iroB, iucA, rmpA, and rmpA2 was identified in ten isolates (Figure 1). Nine isolates, including six of the seven Lineage 1b isolates and three Lineage 2b isolates, had iucA, peg-589 and rmpA2, while Lineage 4 isolate only harbored iucA. These ten isolates were therefore denoted as putative hvKp. In contrast, no virulence genes were discovered in fifteen isolates, which were denoted as cKp. Nine plasmid replicon types were identified. IncFIB replicon was present in all the 25 isolates except the one Lineage 3 isolate, IncHI1B replicon was found in Lineage 1b and Lineage 2 isolates, in line with the carriage of virulence genes. Other replicon varied in different lineages.

3.5. Varied Virulence Plasmid in Different CC15 Lineages

We further compared the sequences of the ten putative hvKp isolates with the classic virulence plasmid pLVPK (Figure 3). The virulence plasmid sequences of the three Lineage 2b isolates were almost the same and covered 87% of the pLVPK plasmid, having two large deletions. Among the six Lineage 1b isolates, the virulence plasmid sequences were also nearly the same and covered 68% of pLVPK, with the exception of one isolate (77% coverage). The virulence plasmid backbone of these isolates was similar to pLVPK, and contained the fragment including rmpA2, peg-589, iutA, and iucABCD. However, only iucA was present in the single Lineage 4 isolate, and its sequence only covered 25% of pLVPK. These results reveal lineage-specific patterns of virulence plasmid, suggesting there may be potential different sources of the virulence plasmids among different lineages.

4. Discussion

The emergence and prevalence of resistant K. pneumoniae has become one of the most urgent clinical crises. Particularly worrying is the spread of strains harboring genes encoding carbapenemases like blaKPC, which confer resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobials including cephalosporins, carbapenems, penicillins, and monobactams [22]. Since first reported, blaKPC-positive strains have spread widely, and many subtypes of the genes have been discovered. While CC258, mainly consisting of ST258, ST11, ST340, and ST512, has spread extensively throughout the world, several non-CC258 subgroups have also become high-risk clones (e.g., ST147 and ST307) and have caught the clinicians’ attention [23]. These subtypes are prevalent in healthcare settings, forming a complicated pool of intra- and inter-species gene exchange. In this study, we found that CC15 is the second prevalent subgroup in our hospital following CC258 (unpublished data), with a high rate of blaKPC and other resistance genes. In addition, the isolates belonged to several lineages and some of them caused outbreaks in different wards, indicating that the isolates had widely spread and had remained active in our hospital.
Traditionally K. pneumoniae has been distinguished into two pathotypes, hvKp and cKp [24]. Between them, cKp features high antimicrobial resistance and has been prevalent in healthcare settings for decades. In contrast, hvKp has been known to cause community-associated infections with low antimicrobial resistance. However, the adaptation and prevalence of hvKp in healthcare settings has become a recent threat [5,25], worsened by the high resistance of clinical strains [24,26,27]. While hvKp subtypes like CC23 commonly causing community-acquired infections have been more and more common in hospitals in recent years [28], a high proportion of CC258 isolates have been acquiring virulence plasmid becoming hvKp [3,4]; it was also observed that other common subtypes of cKp have obtained the virulence plasmid [5], becoming high antimicrobial-resistant hvKp themselves [26]. In this study, we found that among the four CC15 lineages, two clades in two different lineages obtained the pLVPK-like virulence plasmid independently, and one of them had the blaKPC-2 gene, becoming cr-hvKp. These results demonstrate that the spreading of virulence plasmids among cKp subtypes might become easier and more common. Further experimental studies are needed to explore the mechanisms by which the plasmid is spreading, particularly among the newly emerging non-CC258 subgroups. In addition, we observed no direct epidemiological link among most of the cases, but close genetic relationships of the isolates, indicating that there were nosocomial transmissions and that the environment or other carriers might act as intermediary agents in the transmission. This is in line with recent findings that the human gut can serve as a reservoir of hvKp [29].

5. Conclusions

In this study, we found that multiple lineages of CC15 cr-hvKp have emerged in our hospital and have caused nosocomial transmission continually. These findings highlight the importance of surveillance for these local epidemics of non-CC258 subgroups in hospitals.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens11101202/s1, Figure S1: Phylogenetic tree of the isolates we obtained in this study with 665 published CC15 genomes downloaded from GenBank.

Author Contributions

P.D. and J.L. designed the study, supervised the whole project and revised the manuscript. Y.W. and M.H. performed the experiments. Y.W., J.W., J.C. and W.X. collected the clinical data. P.D. performed the bioinformatic analysis. Y.W., M.H. and P.D. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Beijing Municipal Science &Technology Commission grant number Z201100005520035.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under accession number PRJNA881845 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA881845+ accessed on 10 October 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflict to disclose.

References

  1. Wyres, K.L.; Holt, K.E. Klebsiella pneumoniae as a key trafficker of drug resistance genes from environmental to clinically important bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2018, 45, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. De Oliveira, D.M.P.; Forde, B.M.; Kidd, T.J.; Harris, P.N.A.; Schembri, M.A.; Beatson, S.A.; Paterson, D.L.; Walker, M.J. Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 33, e00181-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, M.; Earley, M.; Chen, L.; Hanson, B.M.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Salcedo, S.; Cober, E.; Li, L.; Kanj, S.S. Clinical outcomes and bacterial characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae complex among patients from different global regions (CRACKLE-2): A prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. van Duin, D.; Arias, C.A.; Komarow, L.; Chen, L.; Hanson, B.M.; Weston, G.; Cober, E.; Garner, O.B.; Jacob, J.T.; Satlin, M.J. Molecular and clinical epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in the USA (CRACKLE-2): A prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, C.; Du, P.; Xiao, N.; Ji, F.; Russo, T.A.; Guo, J. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae is emerging as an increasingly prevalent K. pneumoniae pathotype responsible for nosocomial and healthcare-associated infections in Beijing, China. Virulence 2020, 11, 1215–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gu, D.; Dong, N.; Zheng, Z.; Lin, D.; Huang, M.; Wang, L.; Chan, E.W.; Shu, L.; Yu, J.; Zhang, R. A fatal outbreak of ST11 carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Chinese hospital: A molecular epidemiological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lai, Y.-C.; Lu, M.-C.; Hsueh, P.-R. Hypervirulence and carbapenem resistance: Two distinct evolutionary directions that led high-risk Klebsiella pneumoniae clones to epidemic success. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2019, 19, 825–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Jin, L.; Ouyang, P.; Wang, Q.; Wang, R.; Wang, J.; Gao, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, H. Network CC-RE: Evolution of hypervirulence in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in China: A multicentre, molecular epidemiological analysis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 75, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bonnin, R.A.; Jousset, A.B.; Chiarelli, A.; Emeraud, C.; Glaser, P.; Naas, T.; Dortet, L. Emergence of New Non-Clonal Group 258 High-Risk Clones among Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing K. pneumoniae Isolates, France. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 1212–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wyres, K.L.; Lam, M.M.; Holt, K.E. Population genomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 344–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data; Babraham Institute: Cambridge, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lam, M.M.C.; Wick, R.R.; Watts, S.C.; Cerdeira, L.T.; Wyres, K.L.; Holt, K.E. A genomic surveillance framework and genotyping tool for Klebsiella pneumoniae and its related species complex. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bortolaia, V.; Kaas, R.S.; Ruppe, E.; Roberts, M.C.; Schwarz, S.; Cattoir, V.; Philippon, A.; Allesoe, R.L.; Rebelo, A.R.; Florensa, A.F. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3491–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, L.; Yang, J.; Yu, J.; Yao, Z.; Sun, L.; Shen, Y.; Jin, Q. VFDB: A reference database for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, D325–D328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Siguier, P.; Perochon, J.; Lestrade, L.; Mahillon, J.; Chandler, M. ISfinder: The reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D32–D36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Carattoli, A.; Hasman, H. PlasmidFinder and In Silico pMLST: Identification and Typing of Plasmid Replicons in Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS). Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2075, 285–294. [Google Scholar]
  19. Madden, T. The BLAST sequence analysis tool. In The NCBI Handbook [Internet], 2nd ed.; National Center for Biotechnology Information: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  20. Croucher, N.J.; Page, A.J.; Connor, T.R.; Delaney, A.J.; Keane, J.A.; Bentley, S.D.; Parkhill, J.; Harris, S.R. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Ouyang, P.; Jin, C.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, L.; Chen, H.; Wang, Z. Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Data from a Longitudinal Large-scale CRE Study in China (2012–2016). Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2018, 67 (Suppl. S2), S196–S205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aires, C.A.M.; Pereira, P.S.; Rocha-de-Souza, C.M.; Silveira, M.C.; Carvalho-Assef, A.P.D.; Asensi, M.D. Population Structure of KPC-2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Surveillance Rectal Swabs in Brazil. Microb. Drug Resist. 2020, 26, 652–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Russo, T.A.; Marr, C.M. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00001-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ernst, C.M.; Braxton, J.R.; Rodriguez-Osorio, C.A.; Zagieboylo, A.P.; Li, L.; Pironti, A.; Manson, A.L.; Nair, A.V.; Benson, M.; Cummins, K. Adaptive evolution of virulence and persistence in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Choby, J.E.; Howard-Anderson, J.; Weiss, D.S. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae—Clinical and molecular perspectives. J. Intern. Med. 2020, 287, 283–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, X.; Dong, N.; Chan, E.W.; Zhang, R.; Chen, S. Carbapenem Resistance-Encoding and Virulence-Encoding Conjugative Plasmids in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Trends Microbiol. 2020, 29, 65–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Du, P.; Liu, C.; Fan, S.; Baker, S.; Guo, J. The Role of Plasmid and Resistance Gene Acquisition in the Emergence of ST23 Multi-Drug Resistant, Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0192921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Tang, N.; Li, J.; Zhou, J.; Lu, S.; Zhang, G.; Song, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhong, J. The human gut serves as a reservoir of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Gut Microbes 2022, 14, 2114739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of K. pneumoniae CC15 isolates in our hospital correlated with the distribution of resistance genes (red–white heatmap), virulence genes (blue–white heatmap) and plasmid types (green–white heatmap). Six wards were included (A: department of respiratory medicine; B: intensive care unit; C: department of neurological rehabilitation I; D: department of neurosurgery; E: department of neurological rehabilitation II; F: department of spinal and neural functional reconstruction). The isolates are from six types of samples (ba: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; bl: blood; pf: pleural fluid; se: secretion; sp: sputum; ur: urine). The putative cr-hvKp isolates are in red and the one putative hvKp isolate is in blue.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of K. pneumoniae CC15 isolates in our hospital correlated with the distribution of resistance genes (red–white heatmap), virulence genes (blue–white heatmap) and plasmid types (green–white heatmap). Six wards were included (A: department of respiratory medicine; B: intensive care unit; C: department of neurological rehabilitation I; D: department of neurosurgery; E: department of neurological rehabilitation II; F: department of spinal and neural functional reconstruction). The isolates are from six types of samples (ba: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; bl: blood; pf: pleural fluid; se: secretion; sp: sputum; ur: urine). The putative cr-hvKp isolates are in red and the one putative hvKp isolate is in blue.
Pathogens 11 01202 g001
Figure 2. Genetic variation and nosocomial transmission of CC15 sublineages Lineage 1a, 1b, and 2b. The heatmaps represent the cgSNP loci according to the reference genome and the red blocks represent mutations from the reference. The blue circles represent the CC15 isolates and the white ones represent the potential intermediate nodes or estimated ancestors. The blue circles in a red block are from the same patients. The arrows represent the estimated relationship of parent to offspring, and the numbers represent the number of mutations. Six wards are associated (A: department of respiratory medicine; B: intensive care unit; C: department of neurological rehabilitation I; D: department of neurosurgery; E: department of neurological rehabilitation II; F: department of spinal and neural functional reconstruction).
Figure 2. Genetic variation and nosocomial transmission of CC15 sublineages Lineage 1a, 1b, and 2b. The heatmaps represent the cgSNP loci according to the reference genome and the red blocks represent mutations from the reference. The blue circles represent the CC15 isolates and the white ones represent the potential intermediate nodes or estimated ancestors. The blue circles in a red block are from the same patients. The arrows represent the estimated relationship of parent to offspring, and the numbers represent the number of mutations. Six wards are associated (A: department of respiratory medicine; B: intensive care unit; C: department of neurological rehabilitation I; D: department of neurosurgery; E: department of neurological rehabilitation II; F: department of spinal and neural functional reconstruction).
Pathogens 11 01202 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of virulence plasmid sequences found in this study with the virulence plasmid pLVPK. The outermost circle of arrows indicates the genes of reference plasmid pLVPK used for comparison (orange: virulence associated genes; green: integrase, recombinase, and transposase genes; blue: plasmid replicon genes; gray: other functions). The colored rings, from outer to inner, represent the sequences of isolates BAH-kpn65, BAH-kpn57, BAH-kpn110, BAH-kpn77, BAH-kpn103, BAH-kpn150, BAH-kpn35, BAH-kpn41, BAH-kpn70, and BAH-kpn28.
Figure 3. Comparison of virulence plasmid sequences found in this study with the virulence plasmid pLVPK. The outermost circle of arrows indicates the genes of reference plasmid pLVPK used for comparison (orange: virulence associated genes; green: integrase, recombinase, and transposase genes; blue: plasmid replicon genes; gray: other functions). The colored rings, from outer to inner, represent the sequences of isolates BAH-kpn65, BAH-kpn57, BAH-kpn110, BAH-kpn77, BAH-kpn103, BAH-kpn150, BAH-kpn35, BAH-kpn41, BAH-kpn70, and BAH-kpn28.
Pathogens 11 01202 g003
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results.
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results.
IsolateAMK *CIPIPMLEVTOBAMPSAMATMFEPCTTCAZCROTZPSXT
BAH-kpn163S **RRRRRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn182SRRRRRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn141SRRRRRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn124SRRRRRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn126SRRRRRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn169SRRRIRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn166SRRRRRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn24SRRRRRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn173SRRRRRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn116SRRRRRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn77RRRRRRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn70RRRRRRRRRIRRRS
BAH-kpn35RRRRRRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn41RRRRRRRRRIRRRS
BAH-kpn150RRRRRRRRIIRRRS
BAH-kpn80SRRRSRRRRRRRRR
BAH-kpn103RRRRRRRRRIRRRS
BAH-kpn6SRSRIRRRSSRRSR
BAH-kpn26SRSRIRRRRSRRSR
BAH-kpn12SRSRIRRSSSSRSR
BAH-kpn65SRRRSRRRRRRRRS
BAH-kpn110RRRRRRRRRRRRRR
BAH-kpn574RRRRRRRRSRRRR
BAH-kpn144SRRRSRRRRIRRRS
BAH-kpn28SRSSIRRRSSRRSR
* Amikacin (AMK), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Imipenem (IPM), Levofloxacin (LEV), Tobramycin (TOB), Ampicillin (AMP), Ampicillin/Sulbactam (SAM), Aztreonam (ATM), Cefepime (FEP), Cefotetan (CTT), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Ceftriaxone (CRO), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP), and Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (SXT). ** Resistant I, susceptible (S), and intermediate (I).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Hua, M.; Wang, J.; Xing, W.; Chen, J.; Liu, J.; Du, P. Clonal Dissemination of Multidrug-Resistant and Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Clonal Complex in a Chinese Hospital. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1202. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101202

AMA Style

Wang Y, Hua M, Wang J, Xing W, Chen J, Liu J, Du P. Clonal Dissemination of Multidrug-Resistant and Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Clonal Complex in a Chinese Hospital. Pathogens. 2022; 11(10):1202. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101202

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yi, Mingxi Hua, Jingqiao Wang, Wen Xing, Jiatian Chen, Jingyuan Liu, and Pengcheng Du. 2022. "Clonal Dissemination of Multidrug-Resistant and Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Clonal Complex in a Chinese Hospital" Pathogens 11, no. 10: 1202. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101202

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop