Next Article in Journal
Genetic Correlation of Virulent Salmonella Serovars (Extended Spectrum β-Lactamases) Isolated from Broiler Chickens and Human: A Public Health Concern
Next Article in Special Issue
Potential Biocontrol Activities of Populus Endophytes against Several Plant Pathogens Using Different Inhibitory Mechanisms
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Epidemiological Investigation of Piroplasms and Anaplasmataceae Bacteria in Egyptian Domestic Animals and Associated Ticks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application and Development of Biocontrol Agents in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antagonism of Rhizosphere Streptomyces yangpuensis CM253 against the Pathogenic Fungi Causing Corm Rot in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.)

Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(10), 1195; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101195
Submission received: 29 August 2022 / Revised: 7 October 2022 / Accepted: 11 October 2022 / Published: 16 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Control of Phytopathogens: Mechanisms and Applications)

Abstract

:
Plant diseases lead to a significant decline in the output and quality of Chinese herbal medicines. Actinomycetes play a vital role in the rhizosphere ecosystem. This is especially true for Streptomyces, which have become a valuable biological control resource because of their advantages in producing various secondary metabolites with novel structures and remarkable biological activities. The purpose of this study was to isolate an effective antagonistic actinomycete against the pathogen of corm rot in saffron. An antagonistic actinomycete, CM253, was screened from the rhizosphere soil samples of Crocus sativus, by plate co-culture with four pathogenic fungi (Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium solani, Penicillium citreosulfuratum, and Penicillium citrinum). CM253 inhibited the growth and development of F. oxysporum hyphae by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Furthermore, by analyzing the degrading enzyme, the growth-promoting performance, and the whole genome of strain CM253, it was identified as Streptomyces yangpuensis, which produces NH3, protease, glucanase, cellulase, IAA, and ACC deaminase. In addition, 24 secondary metabolite synthesis gene clusters were predicted in antiSMASH. We identified genes encoding 2,3-butanediol; methionine; isoprene (metH, mmuM, ispEFH, gcpE, idi, and ilvABCDEH); biofilm formation; and colonization (upp, rfbBC, efp, aftA, pssA, pilD, fliA, and dhaM). Above all, S. yangpuensis CM253 showed the potential for future development as a biocontrol agent.

1. Introduction

Saffron is the dry stigma of Crocus sativus L., which belongs to the Iridaceae family. Originating from many places, such as Iran, Greece, and Spain, saffron is a world-renowned dye and spice, and is now used in the cosmetics and beverage industries [1,2,3]. Furthermore, saffron has antitumor, antioxidant, antidepressant, anti-inflammatory, and cholesterol-lowering effects [4,5]. Moreover, saffron was introduced into the mainland from India via Tibet and was gradually incorporated into the traditional Chinese medicine system. Under the system of traditional Chinese medicine, saffron also has blood- activating, stasis-dissolving, blood-cooling, detoxifying, nerve-tranquilizing, and antidepressant effects [6]. In the 1960s, saffron was introduced to China from Japan and was successfully planted in Chongming in the 1980s [7]. However, C. sativus is a triploid plant that can only be propagated asexually by corms, which is vulnerable to infection with viruses and is difficult to cultivate. Saffron corm rot is a global problem that has limited the development of the saffron industry [8,9,10]. Worldwide, F. solani, F. oxysporum, F. culmorum, F. roseum, Trichoderma sp., Sclerotium rolfsii, Sclerotinia gladioli, Penicillium sp., Sclerotinia cormorum, Rhizoctonia crocorum, and Rhizopus oryzae can cause corm rot [10,11,12,13,14,15]. In China, external factors, such as climate and soil characteristics, have led to the increased incidence of and the increased severity of saffron corm disease. This has led to a significant decrease in the saffron yield and its quality, which has restricted the development of the saffron industry [16,17,18]. For example, F. oxysporum, F. solani, Aspergillus brasiliensis, Aspergillus niger, and Penicillium solitum can cause corm rot in saffron [19,20,21]. In the early stage of this study, we confirmed that four strains of F. oxysporum, F. solani, P. citreosulfuratum, and P. citrinum were the main pathogens of saffron corm rot in Chongming Island—one of the main saffron-producing areas in China—among which P. citreosulfuratum was first reported to cause the black spot disease of saffron [22]. On Chongming Island, corm rot caused by F. oxysporum is the most destructive saffron disease known to date. Currently, the two-segment (TS) cropping system (indoor soilless cultivation and flower picking, and the outdoor field cultivation of seed corms) is used to reduce disease and pest impact on the C. sativus yield, which only partially alleviates the issue. At present, saffron, which is produced on a nationwide scale in China, cannot meet the market demand, thereby, necessitating a large number of imports from Iran.
The term “rhizosphere” was first suggested by Hilnter in 1904 and was used to define the microorganisms near the rhizosphere soil, as rhizosphere microorganisms. Rhizosphere microorganisms can be classified as beneficial, harmful, or neutral [23]. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria are a type of beneficial microorganism living near the plant roots, which can promote plant growth, improve crop yields and quality, and can improve plant stress resistance [24,25,26]. The healthy rhizosphere soil of plants is considered an excellent source of PGPR (plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria), which can promote plant growth and prevent diseases. Because they are affected by the secretion of medicinal plant roots over long periods of time, there are many types of rhizosphere microorganisms [27]. Actinomycetes are a type of microbial resource that can produce natural active products. Studies have shown that there are abundant actinomycetes resources in the rhizosphere of medicinal plants, which can produce a variety of antibiotics and extracellular enzymes to promote growth and protect plants from pathogens [28,29,30]. The biocontrol mechanism of Streptomyces on plant diseases includes antagonism, competition, and inducing plant resistance, and it is one of the main sources of known bioactive substances [31]. Various studies have shown that Streptomyces mediates rice blast disease, watermelon Fusarium wilt disease, Fusarium wilt of banana, and rust rot, as well as root rot in ginseng [32,33,34,35].
Fungicides are widely used to prevent and control corm disease in saffron and to increase the yields, which poses a risk in terms of the quality and safety of Chinese medicinal materials. Furthermore, this may also promote the emergence of drug-resistant fungal strains. Moreover, the accumulation of chemical substances also presents a risk to human health. Therefore, the use of PGPR and its metabolites, which can promote plant growth, as a biological control agent (BCA) to regulate the pathogen of corm rot in saffron may be an important tool to promote the development of the saffron industry.
The purpose of this study was to isolate an effective antagonistic actinomycete against the pathogen of corm rot in saffron. Here, 152 actinomycetes were isolated from the rhizosphere soil of healthy C. sativus, by co-culture with four pathogenic fungi (F. oxysporum, F. solani, P. citreosulfuratum, and P. citrinum). Next, the actinomycetes species with the best antagonistic effect was selected for further study. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and whole genome sequencing analysis, Streptomyces yangpuensis CM253 was identified. Subsequently, the antagonistic activity and mechanism of the strain CM253 were studied and its mechanisms of biological control were evaluated.

2. Results

2.1. Screening of Biocontrol Actinomyces

In this experiment, 152 actinomycetes were isolated from the rhizosphere soil of C. sativus, among which the best antagonistic actinomycetes (CM253) had inhibition rates of 67.56%, 57.19%, 35.85%, and 36.36%, on F. oxysporum, F. solani, P. citrinum, and P. citreosulfuratum, respectively (Figure 1).

2.2. Effect of Biocontrol Actinomycete CM253 on Mycelium Morphology

In the control group, F. oxysporum hyphae were thick, with a smooth surface, nearly round in cross-section, clear in cell structure, and numerous in spores, all of which were indicative of a normal growth state (Figure 2A). However, in the S. yangpuensis CM253 treatment group, the hyphae were broken; the thickness was uneven, distorted, shriveled, and shrunken; the distribution was disordered; and the cut surface was irregular. In addition, the cytoplasm was turbid and chaotic; the cell walls, cell membranes, and dysplasia were evident in the vacuoles; and the spores were distorted and reduced (Figure 2B).

2.3. Analysis of Degrading Enzyme Production and Growth-Promoting Performance of Biocontrol Strain CM253

Based on the experimental phenomena, we found that strain CM253 has cellulase, protease, and glucanase activities, but lacks chitinase activity (Table 1, Figure S1). Strain CM253 can produce siderophore; IAA (indole acetic acid) and ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid) deaminase enzyme; and NH3, but it cannot dissolve phosphorus and potassium (Table 1, Figure S2).

2.4. Identification and Whole Genome Sequencing of the CM253 Biocontrol Strain

A single colony of strain CM253 is nearly round, slightly convex, dry, with a white aerial hyphae, and a pale-yellow basal mycelium (Figure 3A). The hyphae are helical rods, and the spores are short rods, approximately 1 µm long (Figure 3B). According to the above morphological characteristics and to the physiological and biochemical tests (Table 2), this strain was preliminarily identified as Streptomyces. Subsequently, the 16S rRNA gene sequence was compared to the NCBI database, and strain CM253 was confirmed to be Streptomyces. To determine the phylogenetic status of CM253, we sequenced the complete genome of CM253 (Figure 4) (GenBank accession numbers: CP102514-CP102517). A comparison of local databases, based on 31 house-keeping genes (dnaG, frr, infC, nusA, pgk, pyrG, rplA, rplB, rplC, rplD, rplE, rplF, rplK, rplL, rplM, rplN, rplP, rplS, rplT, rpmA, rpoB, rpsB, rpsC, rpsE, rpsI, rpsJ, rpsK, rpsM, rpsS, smpB, and tsf), allowed for the selection of the 19 closest strains at the species level. Based on the sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis results of 31 housekeeping genes, the similarity between the strain CM253 and S. yangpuensis was 98.9%, and the phylogenetic distance between strain CM253 and S. yangpuensis was the closest. Moreover, a phylogenetic tree was built, based on the neighbor-joining (NJ) method, using MEGA 6.0 software (Auckland, New Zealand) (Figure 5). In addition, the genome sequences of strain CM253 were 96.47% identical, by average nucleotide identity (ANI), to the S. yangpuensis genome. Considering the morphology, the biochemical characteristics, the phylogeneny, and the whole genome sequence analysis, strain CM253 was categorized as S. yangpuensis.
The complete genome of S. yangpuensis CM253 is composed of one chromosome (7,435,303 bp) and three plasmids (362,437 bp, 62,905 bp, and 231,470 bp); with a GC content of 72.23% (Figure 4); and a CDS value of 7237, including 73 tRNAs, 21 16S-23S-5S rRNAs, 52 sRNAs, and 7237 coding genes. The total length of the coding region is 7,053,798 bp, accounting for 87.17% of the total genome length. The average gene length is 974.69 bp, with a total of 858 TRFs, 2 pre-phages, 7 genomic islands, and 54 confirmed types of sequences predicted in the genome.
In total, 3595 coding genes of S. yangpuensis CM253 were annotated in the GO database, accounting for 49.68% of the total protein-coding gene sequences (Figure 6). There are 457 types of genes related to biological processes in the protein-coding genes of S. yangpuensis CM253, among which the largest number are the genes related to the regulation of transcription and DNA-templated (GO: 0006355,137). There are 57 types of genes related to molecular functions, of which the biggest proportion is related to membrane integration components (GO: 0016021,914). There are 798 types of genes related to cellular components, of which DNA binding (GO: 0003677, 483) is the most prevalent, followed by ATP binding (GO:0005524,352); cytoplasmic (GO:0005737,248); transcription factor activity; sequence-specific DNA binding (GO:0003700,200); metal ion binding (GO:0046872,160); and hydrolase activity (GO:0016787,154).
The protein coding sequences of the predicted genome of S. yangpuensis CM253 was compared with the COG database, and we found that 5380 protein-coding genes could be functionally annotated, accounting for 74.34% of the total protein sequence. There are 500 metabolic pathways involved in transcription, 372 pathways involved in amino acid transport and metabolism, 291 pathways involved in energy production and conversion, 289 pathways that participate in signal transduction mechanisms, and 284 pathways that participate in hydrocarbon transport and metallurgy. Only a small number of the COG pathways have clear functions, while the other 1989 pathways with unknown functions need to be further studied in the future (Figure 7).
A total of 3128 genes were annotated in the S. yangpuensis CM253 genome, in the KEGG database, accounting for 43.22% of the predicted number of genes, and 42 functional entries, with the gene functions divided into six classes. Genes related to metabolism were the most prevalent—up to 2343—including global and overview maps (902); amino acid metabolism (288); carbohydrate metabolism (271); metabolism of cofactors and vitamins (171); and energy metabolism (165); as well as other pathways, which is conducive to growth in complex environments and broad-spectrum antibacterial ability. The number of genes annotated to environmental information processing, human diseases, genetic information processing, cell processes, and organizational systems were 225, 107, 219, 150, and 84, respectively (Figure 8).
Comparing the genome sequence with the CAZy database, we found that there were 76 protein-coding domains in the S. yangpuensis CM253 genome belonging to the CAZy family. These include 76, 60, 59, 28, 8, and 1 gene from the following groups: glycoside hydrolases (GHs), glycolipids (CES), glycosyl transferases (GTs), auxiliary activities (AAs), carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs), and polysaccharide lyases (PLs), respectively. The most abundant family is GT2 (24 members), which is typically responsible for transferring nucleotide diphosphate sugars to polysaccharides and lipids (Figure 9).
There are 24 secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in the S. yangpuensis genome, including terpene, non-ribosomal peptide-synthase (NRPS), polyketide synthase (PKS), siderophore, lanthipeptide, melanin, and bacteriocin. Four of these are identical to the synthetic gene clusters of venezuelin, JBIR-126, coelichelin, and alkylresorcinol with antibacterial activity. Among these, five predicted gene clusters have no similarity with known gene clusters, and these gene clusters may also synthesize some new active substances; however, all of these gene clusters require further verification (Table 3).

3. Discussion

In this study, the CM253 strain was isolated from the rhizosphere soil of healthy crocus sativus, which had significant antagonistic effects on four C. sativus pathogens. We previously isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which also had an obvious antagonistic effect on the pathogenic fungi of saffron [36]. There have been numerous studies on the prevention and control of crocus corm rot and the advancement of crocus yields and quality by beneficial strains. For example, Burkholderia gladioli E39CS3, an endophytic bacteria of C. sativus, has been shown to inhibit the in vivo corm rot of F. oxysporum, a specific pathogen of C. sativus, and to induce systemic drug resistance (ISR) [37]. Curtobacterium herbarum, Cs10, improves the number of flowers and significantly enhances the length of the saffron filaments and the overall saffron production [38]. Based on morphology, biochemical characteristics, phylogeny, and a whole genome sequence analysis, the CM253 strain was identified as S. yangpuensis. Importantly, S. yangpuensis is reported to have an inhibitory effect on F. oxysporum. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that S. yangpuensis has an antagonistic effect on P. citreosulfuratum, F. solani, and P. citrinum. S. yangpuensis also has strong antagonistic activity against Botryosphaeria dothidea, Fusarium pseudograminearum, Phytophthora capsici, Colletotrichum orbicule, Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici, and Setosphaeria turcica [39].
The phenomena of plant nitrogen deficiency, phosphorus deficiency, and iron deficiency occur widely in nature and are three important factors that limit plant growth. An evaluation of its PGP performance showed that CM253 carries out and produces iron carriers and NH3. Siderophore is an organic chelating agent with a relatively low molecular weight (500–1000), which can combine with insoluble iron elements in the environment and form siderophore-Fe to prevent the proliferation of plant pathogens and to effectively promote antibiotic entry [40]. A bioinformatic analysis of the CM253 genome, using antiSMASH, showed that three biosynthesis gene clusters of iron were composed of 26 genes. Among them, iucD belongs to the NIS-type iron carrier biosynthetic gene, while hemE and hemY exist in the porphyrin metabolic pathway, which have the functions of protoporphyrin/coproporphyrin ferrochelatase and Fe-coproporphyrin III decarboxylase, respectively. The amino acid sequences in hemE and hemY gene are 384 bp and 494 bp in length, respectively. ACC deaminase catalyzes ethylene in plants to α-ketobutyrate, thus reducing the ethylene-mediated inhibition of photosynthesis. The gene, gene4579, which regulates the metabolic pathway of ACC degradation to 2-Oxobutanoate, was discovered in the CM253 genome. IAA is a plant hormone that regulates plant root growth by stimulating the proliferation and elongation of root cells. The IAA synthesis pathway is divided into the tryptophan-dependent pathway and the tryptophan-independent pathway. The trpABC, aofH, and amiE involved in regulating the tryptophan-dependent IAA synthesis pathway were found in the CM253 genome [41,42]. The PGP performance evaluation test data also directly showed that S. yangpuensis can produce IAA and ACC deaminase, which has the potential to promote the root development of C. sativus.
The main mechanisms of bacterial antagonism include competition for nutrients and space, antibiotic synthesis, and the induction of host resistance [43]. The CM253 genome contains genes related to protease, cellulase, and β-glucosidase, such as pepD, clpPX, dop, tri, ftsH, lon, bglBX, and xynA, as well as some unknown genes, which can damage the cell walls of pathogenic fungi [44,45,46]. H2S can help plants resist various abiotic stresses such as drought, cold, heat, salinity, hypoxia, and toxic metals [47]. The cysCDHKMNZ gene, which is related to sulfate transport, was also identified in the CM253 genome [48]. Biofilm formation is the first step in root colonization by rhizosphere bacteria, which can help to mediate plant protection from environmental factors and plant diseases. Therefore, the discovery of genes related to the biofilm formation and colonization of CM253 is important for aiding our understanding of its mechanism as a biocontrol bacterium [49]. In this study, we found related biofilm formation and colonization genes in the CM253 genome, including upp, rfbBC, efp, aftA, pssA, pilD, fliA, and dhaM [50]. The synthetic genes (metH, mmuM, ispEFH, gcpE, idi, and ilvABCDEH) of 2,3- butanediol, methionine, and isoprene were also found in the S. yangpuensis genome, which suggests that S. yangpuensis CM253 may induce host resistance by producing resistance-related substances to fight the stem rot of C. sativus. The prediction data of the gene clusters synthesized by secondary metabolites, suggest that the similarity of four gene clusters with the synthesis of venezuelin, alkylresorcinol, JBIR-126, and coelichelin gene clusters with antibacterial activity, was 100% [51,52,53]. These antibacterial substances may be related to the inhibitory effect of CM253 on saffron pathogens. Therefore, there is a need to isolate, purify, and identify the antifungal metabolites produced by this strain to clarify its antagonistic mechanism against the pathogens of corm rot in saffron crocus pathogenic fungi.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Indicative Pathogenic Fungi

In 2020, four pathogenic fungi (F. oxysporum, F. Solani, P. citreosulfuratum, and P. citrinum) were isolated and purified from the rotten bulbs of saffron, according to Koch postulates, and were stored in our laboratory’s 4 °C refrigerator.

4.2. Collection of Soil and Isolation and Purification of Biocontrol Actinomycetes

The rhizosphere soil samples of C. sativus were collected from Chongming District, Shanghai (31.62° N and 121.40° E), in December 2020. They were stored in plastic bags, in refrigerated containers, and transported to the laboratory of the Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, for actinomycetes isolation. After the rhizosphere soil was naturally dried in the shade, it was crushed in a mortar, screened using a 20-mesh sieve, and 5 g of soil samples were weighed and placed in a triangular bottle, containing 45 mL of sterile water. Next, a sterile triangular bottle was placed on a shaker at 30 °C, sealed with a sealing film, and shaken for 2 h at 150 rpm [54]. Subsequently, 1 mL was taken and diluted in 9 mL of sterile water, in a centrifuge tube, and thoroughly mixed. This mixture was used to prepare 10−2, 10−3, 10−4, and 10−5 soil suspensions for later use [55]. Approximately 200 μL of each serially diluted suspension was added to Gause′s medium No. 1, trehalose–proline medium, HV medium, R2A medium, ISP2 medium, ISP3 medium, and ISP5 medium, containing cycloheximide (50 mg/L) and nalidixic acid (20 mg/L), respectively, which were used to cultivate actinomycetes [56,57,58]. This was repeated 3 times and all the plates were stored upside down and colony growth was observed every day. Actinomycetes colonies were picked and transferred to ISP3 culture medium. After purification, single colonies were inoculated into the corresponding slant culture medium and stored at 4 °C, for later use.

4.3. In Vitro Screening for Antibacterial Activity

The isolated actinomycetes were screened in vitro by the plate confrontation method [59]. Single colonies of 5 mm F. oxysporum, F. solani, P. limonene sulfate, P. citrinum, and actinomycetes were punched with a hole punch, then the pathogen plugs were placed in the center of PDA plate. Subsequently, actinomycetes were inoculated approximately 2.5 cm away from the pathogen plugs in a criss-cross formation and compared with the PDA plate with only pathogen plugs. The plates were then cultured in an incubator at 28 °C, for 5–10 days, before they were evaluated for the appearance of antagonistic bands in the experimental group. Each bacterium was tested in technical and biological triplicates and the inhibition rate was calculated to identify the actinomycetes with the best antagonistic activity. The zone of inhibition against pathogenic fungi was estimated by averaging two diameters, measured perpendicularly. Inhibition rate = (control colony diameter − treatment colony diameter)/control colony diameter × 100% [60].

4.4. Morphological Characteristics, Physiology, and Biochemistry of Rhizosphere Actinomycete Strain CM253

Actinomycetes were streaked onto the ISP3 medium for 5 days, and the shape, color, and texture of colonies were recorded. Square agar blocks with actinomycetes, with a side length of approximately 0.5 cm, were cut from the medium, and SEM samples were prepared according to a previously described method [61]. Briefly, the mycelium was fixed with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde, at 4 °C, for 24 h, washed three times with 0.1 M PBS, then fixed with 1% (v/v) osmic acid at 4 °C, for 3 h, and washed three times with 0.1 M PBS. Next, samples were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min in 30%, 50%, 75%, 90%, 95%, and 100% (v/v) absolute ethanol, for gradient dehydration. Samples were then dried in a Leica EM CPD300 critical point dryer (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), and the dried sample was attached to a special sample table, with double-sided conductive adhesive. Finally, the sample table was placed in a Leica EM ACE600 ion sputter coater (Leica Microsystems, Vienna, Austria) to finish the surface gold plating treatment, and further observed under SEM. Physiological and biochemical tests of biocontrol actinomycetes were carried out according to the handbook of identification of common bacterial systems [62]. Production of H2S and measurement of growth temperature, starch hydrolysis, gelatin liquefaction, and nitrate reduction were assessed, among other characteristics.

4.5. Molecular Identification of Rhizosphere Actinomycete Strain CM253

PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene in CM253 was achieved using universal primers 27 F: 5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′ and 1492R: 5′-TACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′ [63]. The amplified PCR products were then purified and sequenced by Sanger sequencing at Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The 16S rRNA sequence was compared to the NCBI GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 22 August 2022) database, using the blast (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST, accessed on 22 August 2022) [64] algorithm. A phylogenetic tree was then constructed using the NJ method in the MEGA 6.0 software (Auckland, New Zealand). Support for the tree topology was estimated with 1000 bootstrap replicates [65].

4.6. Effect of Rhizosphere Actinomycete Strain CM253 on Mycelia Morphology of F. oxysporum

F. oxysporum was inoculated on PDA culture medium and grown in an incubator at 28 °C, for 5–10 days. Microscopic characteristics were observed by SEM, according to the above method. Thereafter, 1 mm3 hyphae samples were taken and used to prepare TEM samples, as previously described [66]. Briefly, the mycelium was fixed with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde, at 4 °C, washed with 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.2) three times, fixed in 1% (w/v) osmic acid for 2 h, and rinsed with 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.2) three times. Subsequently, samples were embedded in epoxy resin. Finally, sections were cut into 60 nm slices, using a Leica 705902 ultrathin microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), before staining with lead citrate for 15 min. Finally, samples were rinsed three times with ddH2O and left to air dry before analysis on a Feitecna AI G2 Spirit TEM.

4.7. Determination of Hydrolase Activity

Secretion of the lytic enzymes is considered to be an effective way to prevent plant pathogens near the rhizosphere, among all known biological control mechanisms [67]. A single colony of the activated biocontrol bacteria was selected and connected to the chitin assay plate, prepared as previously described by Lau et al. [68]. Glucanase-, protease-, and cellulase assay plates were prepared as previously described by Putri et al. [69], Prajapati et al. [70], and Sukmawati et al. [71], respectively. A transparent circle was indicative of the bacteria being able to produce the relevant degrading enzyme.

4.8. In Vitro Assessment of Plant Growth Promotion (PGP) Traits

Using the method described by Suárez-Moreno et al. [72], phosphate solubilizing capacity was qualitatively determined by inoculating a single colony of each strain in the phosphate growth medium (NBRIP) from the American Botanical Institute, for 5 days. According to the method described by Chengqun et al. [73], the biocontrol bacteria were inoculated on a silicate medium plate for five days, and a clear circle was produced, suggesting that the bacteria can dissolve potassium. Referring to the method described by Suarez-Moreno et al. [72], the specific protocol was as follows: biocontrol actinomyces were inoculated into LB liquid medium, containing 100 mg/L-tryptophan. After culturing for 3 days, 100 μL of liquid bacterial culture was transferred to a test tube and mixed with an equal volume of Salkowski colorimetric solution (30 min of 35% (v/v) HClO4 + 1 mL of 0.5 mol/L FeCl3), before incubation in the dark for 30 min. If the color turned red, this suggested that the actinomyces could produce IAA. As described by Dubey [74], the biocontrol actinomycetes were inoculated in nitrogen-free liquid medium for 1 day, and 100 μL of bacterial liquid was inoculated into DF medium for shaking culture, for 2 days, and then transferred to ADF medium, according to 2% of the inoculum. Cultivation continued for 2 d. Normal growth was indicative of ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid) deaminase production. The biocontrol actinomycetes were inoculated in the CAS medium for five days, and an orange halo was produced, suggesting siderophore production [75]. The biocontrol actinomycetes were inoculated into 50 mL peptone water (10 g/L) in conical flasks, and after 3 d of culture, 2 mL of Nessler reagent was added to determine ammonia production in peptone water [76].

4.9. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) of Biocontrol Actinomycete CM253

4.9.1. Sample Preparation

A single colony of biocontrol actinomycete CM253 was selected and inoculated into GY liquid medium, which was then cultured at 30 °C, with shaking at 200 rpm. Once the cultures reached an optical density of 0.4–0.8 at 600 nm (OD600), the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8000 rpm, at 4 °C, for 5 min. Next, an appropriate amount of PBS buffer solution was added, and the cells were centrifuged again before being quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen. The cells were immediately transported by dry ice to MGE Biological Medicine Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China), for whole genome sequencing.

4.9.2. DNA Extraction, Genome Sequencing, and Assembly

Genomic DNA was extracted using the Cetyltrimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) method, with minor modifications. Following DNA concentration, the quality and integrity were determined by a Qubit Flurometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
For Illumina sequencing, at least 1 μg of genomic DNA was used for each strain for sequencing library construction. DNA samples were sheared into 400–500 bp fragments, using a Covaris M220 Focused Acoustic Shearer. Fragment size distribution was determined using agarose gel electrophoresis and genomic fragments in the 300–500 bp range were enriched for Illumina sequencing libraries, using the NEXTflex™ Rapid DNA-Seq Kit (Bioo Scientific, Austin, Austria) [44]. At least 15 μg of genomic DNA was processed into 10 kb fragments, using G-tubes (Covaris, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA). These fragments were then purified according to instructions (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA), with terminal completion and two ends connected to the SMRT bell sequencing linker, respectively [77]. Genomic DNA was sequenced using a combination of PacBio RS II Single Molecule Real Time (SMRT) and Illumina sequencing platforms. All analyses were performed using the free Majorbio Cloud Platform (www.majorbio.com accessed on 6 December 2021), from Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd.
The complete genome sequence was assembled using both PacBio and Illumina reads. The original image data were transferred into sequence data via base calling, which is defined as raw data or raw reads, and saved as FASTQ files. These FASTQ files were the original data provided for users, in which the read sequences and quality information were included. A statistic of quality information was applied for quality trimming, by which the low-quality data could be removed to generate clean data. The reads were then assembled into contigs, using hierarchical genome assembly process (HGAP) and canu [78]. The last circular step was checked and finished manually, generating a complete genome, with seamless chromosomes and plasmids. Finally, error correction of the PacBio assembly results was performed using the Illumina reads, using Pilon [79].

4.9.3. Gene Prediction and Annotation

Glimmer [80] was used to predict the coding sequence in the genome, and tRNAscan-SE, RNAmmer, Rfam, and CRISPR recognition tools were used to predict tRNA, rRNA, ncRNA, and CRISPRs, respectively [81,82,83]. Next, functional annotation was performed by comparison with databases of the Cluster of Orthodox Groups (COG), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Gene Ontology (GO). Secondary metabolites and carbohydrate-active enzymes were predicted using antiSMASH 4.0.2 (https://dl.secondarymetabolites.org/releases/4.0.2/, accessed on 6 December 2021) and CAZymes databases [84]. Finally, the genome circle map was drawn in CGview [85].

5. Conclusions

We selected an effective actinomycete, CM253, from the rhizosphere soil of crocus sativus. According to the above experimental results, we found that S. yangpuensis produces NH3, protease, glucanase, cellulase, IAA, and ACC deaminase to achieve biological control of the pathogenic fungi of C. sativus corm rot. According to the analysis of the synthetic gene cluster of the secondary metabolites, we found that CM253 had a very active metabolic capacity. There is a need to isolate and purify the antifungal metabolites produced by CM253 in future studies, to clarify its antagonistic mechanism against the pathogen of corm rot in saffron crocus pathogenic fungi.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens11101195/s1. Figure S1: hydrolytic enzymes activities; Figure S2: plant growth promoting attributes.

Author Contributions

L.T.: validation, data curation, writing—original draft; S.H.: investigation and sample collection; X.W. and Y.G.: investigation and data analysis; L.H.: supervision and project administration; L.W. and W.L.: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan for Sustainable Development of Chongming District, Shanghai, grant number: CK2022-01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pitsikas, N. Crocus sativus L. extracts and its constituents crocins and safranal; Potential candidates for schizophrenia treatment? Molecules 2021, 26, 1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cardone, L.; Castronuovo, D.; Perniola, M.; Cicco, N.; Candido, V. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.), the king of spices: An overview. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 272, 109560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moratalla-López, N.; Bagur, M.J.; Lorenzo, C.; Martínez-Navarro, M.E.; Salinas, M.R.; Alonso, G.L. Bioactivity and bioavailability of the major metabolites of Crocus sativus L. flower. Molecules 2019, 24, 2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Srivastava, R.; Ahmed, H.; Dixit, R.K.; Dharamveer; Saraf, S.A. Crocus sativus L.: A comprehensive review. Pharm. Rev. 2010, 4, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mzabri, I.; Addi, M.; Berrichi, A. Traditional and Modern Uses of Saffron (Crocus sativus). Cosmetics 2019, 6, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Commission, C.P. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China 2020; China Medical Science Press: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, B.; Dong, Y.; Yao, C.; Jiang, F. Survey on Resource Development of Saffron in China. Chin. J. Mod. Appl. Pharm. 2022, 39, 1783–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Najari, G.; Nourollahi, K.; Piri, M. The first report of Fusarium oxysporum causal agent of wild saffron corm rot disease in Iran. Saffron Agron. Technol. 2018, 6, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kafi, M.; Kamili, A.N.; Husaini, A.M.; Ozturk, M.; Altay, V. An Expensive Spice Saffron (Crocus sativus L.): A Case Study from Kashmir, Iran, and Turkey. In Global Perspectives on Underutilized Crops; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 109–149. [Google Scholar]
  10. Muñoz, R.M.; Lerma, M.L.; Castillo, P.; Armengol, J.; Somoza, E.; Woodhall, J.W. First report of stromatinia gladioli causing neck and corm rot of Crocus sativus in Spain. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 282–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sutton, M.W.; Wale, S.J. The control of Penicillium corymbiferum on crocus and its effect on corm production. Plant Pathol. 1985, 34, 566–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kalha, C.; Gupta, V.; Gupta, D.; Priya, S. First report of sclerotial rot of saffron caused by Sclerotium rolfsii in India. Plant Dis. 2007, 91, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gupta, R.; Vakhlu, J. Native Bacillus amyloliquefaciens W2 as a potential biocontrol for Fusarium oxysporum R1 causing corm rot of Crocus sativus. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2015, 143, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wani, Z.A.; Mirza, D.N.; Arora, P.; Riyaz-Ul-Hassan, S. Molecular phylogeny, diversity, community structure, and plant growth promoting properties of fungal endophytes associated with the corms of saffron plant: An insight into the microbiome of Crocus sativus Linn. Fungal Biol. 2016, 120, 1509–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Belfiori, B.; Rubini, A.; Riccioni, C. Diversity of endophytic and pathogenic fungi of saffron (Crocus sativus) plants from cultivation sites in Italy. Diversity 2021, 13, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Feizi, H.; Moradi, R. Assessing involved managing factors in gap yield between traditional and ideal saffron cultivating systems in Razavi and South Khorasan provinces. J. Saffron Res. 2020, 7, 283–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aghhavani Shajari, M.; Rezvani Moghaddam, P.; Ghorbani, R.; Koocheki, A. The possibility of improving saffron (Crocus sativus L.) flower and corm yield through the irrigation and soil texture managements. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 271, 109485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, T.; Qiu, X.; Zhao, L.; Yang, W.; Wen, F.; Wu, Q.; Yan, J.; Xu, B.; Chen, J.; Ma, Y.; et al. Optimal light intensity and quality increased the saffron daughter corm yield by inhibiting the degradation of reserves in mother corms during the reproductive stage. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 176, 114396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, T.; Huang, C.; Deng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Hu, J.; Wang, R.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Y.; Kai, G. First report of corm rot on saffron caused by Penicillium solitum in China. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wei, L.; Duan, X.; Lu, G.; Chang, J.; Zhou, X.; Ma, H.; Qi, H. ldentification of saffron corm rot disease pathogen and laboratory screening of chemical agents. Plant Prot. 2021, 47, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiening, W.; Siqi, G.; Jiajia, C.; Xue, D.; Junbo, L.; Xiujuan, L.; Guoyin, K.; Wei, Z. Isolation and identification of pathogenic fungi of stem rot in Crocus sativus. J. Zhejiang A&F Univ. 2022, 39, 1080–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, S.; Sun, W.; Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Li, W. First report of black spot caused by Penicillium citreosulfuratum on saffron in Chongming Island, China. Plant Dis. 2021, 106, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ali, M.A.; Naveed, M.; Mustafa, A.; Abbas, A. The good, the bad, and the ugly of rhizosphere microbiome. In Probiotics and Plant Health; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 253–290. [Google Scholar]
  24. Oleńska, E.; Małek, W.; Wójcik, M.; Swiecicka, I.; Thijs, S.; Vangronsveld, J. Beneficial features of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving plant growth and health in challenging conditions: A methodical review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 743, 140682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bhanse, P.; Kumar, M.; Singh, L.; Awasthi, M.K.; Qureshi, A. Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in boosting the phytoremediation of stressed soils: Opportunities, challenges, and prospects. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 134954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Azizi, S.; Tabari Kouchaksaraei, M.; Hadian, J.; Fallah Nosrat Abad, A.R.; Modarres Sanavi, S.A.M.; Ammer, C.; Bader, M.K.F. Dual inoculations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria boost drought resistance and essential oil yield of common myrtle. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 497, 119478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yuan, Y.; Zuo, J.; Zhang, H.; Zu, M.; Liu, S. The Chinese medicinal plants rhizosphere: Metabolites, microorganisms, and interaction. Rhizosphere 2022, 22, 100540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Madhurama, G.; Sonam, D.; Urmil, P.G.; Ravindra, N.K. Diversity and biopotential of endophytic actinomycetes from three medicinal plants in India. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 8, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Djemouai, N.; Meklat, A.; Gaceb-Terrak, R.; Youcef, K.O.H.; Nacer, A.; Saadi, S.A.; Saad, S.; Verheecke-Vaessen, C.; Bouras, N. Streptomyces species from the rhizosphere of the medicinal plant Artemisia herba-alba Asso: Screening for biological activities biological activities. Biologia 2022, 77, 2281–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Selim, M.S.M.; Abdelhamid, S.A.; Mohamed, S.S. Secondary metabolites and biodiversity of actinomycetes. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vurukonda, S.S.K.P.; Giovanardi, D.; Stefani, E. Plant growth promoting and biocontrol activity of Streptomyces spp. as endophytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Qi, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Zhao, S. Efficacy of plant growth-promoting bacteria Streptomyces werraensis F3 for chemical modifications of diseased soil of ginseng. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2021, 31, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Faheem, M.; Raza, W.; Zhong, W.; Nan, Z.; Shen, Q.; Xu, Y. Evaluation of the biocontrol potential of Streptomyces goshikiensis YCXU against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. Biol. Control 2015, 81, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yun, T.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, D.; Jing, T.; Zang, X.; Qi, D.; Chen, Y.; Li, K.; Zhao, Y.; Tang, W. Anti-Foc RT4 activity of a newly isolated Streptomyces sp. 5–10 from a medicinal plant (Curculigo capitulata). Front. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 610698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chaiharn, M.; Theantana, T.; Pathom-Aree, W. Evaluation of biocontrol activities of Streptomyces spp. against rice blast disease fungi. Pathogens 2020, 9, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Hu, S.; Wang, X.; Sun, W.; Wang, L.; Li, W. In vitro study of biocontrol potential of rhizospheric Pseudomonas aeruginosa against pathogenic fungi of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Pathogens 2021, 10, 1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ahmad, T.; Bashir, A.; Farooq, S.; Riyaz-Ul-Hassan, S. Burkholderia gladioli E39CS3, an endophyte of Crocus sativus Linn., induces host resistance against corm-rot caused by Fusarium oxysporum. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 132, 495–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Diez-Mendez, A.; Rivas, R. Improvement of saffron production using Curtobacterium herbarum as a bioinoculant under greenhouse conditions. AIMS Microbiol. 2017, 3, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, H.; Xi, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wen, C. Screening, identification of Streptomyces yangpuensis WLU210 and its biocontrol effect on Fusarium wilt of bitter gourd. Chin. J. Biol. Control 2021, 37, 1058–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shen, X.; Hu, H.; Peng, H.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X. Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zaid, D.S.; Cai, S.; Hu, C.; Li, Z.; Li, Y. Comparative genome analysis reveals phylogenetic identity of Bacillus velezensis HNA3 and genomic insights into its plant growth promotion and biocontrol effects. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e02169-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khasin, M.; Cahoon, R.R.; Nickerson, K.W.; Riekhof, W.R. Molecular machinery of auxin synthesis, secretion, and perception in the unicellular chlorophyte alga Chlorella sorokiniana UTEX 1230. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Goswami, D.; Thakker, J.N.; Dhandhukia, P.C. Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A review. Cogent Food Agric. 2016, 2, 1127500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guo, D.-J.; Singh, R.K.; Singh, P.; Li, D.-P.; Sharma, A.; Xing, Y.-X.; Song, X.-P.; Yang, L.-T.; Li, Y.-R. Complete genome sequence of Enterobacter roggenkampii ED5, a nitrogen fixing plant growth promoting endophytic bacterium with biocontrol and stress tolerance properties, isolated from sugarcane root. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 580081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Khan, N.; Martinez-Hidalgo, P.; Ice, T.A.; Maymon, M.; Humm, E.A.; Nejat, N.; Sanders, E.R.; Kaplan, D.; Hirsch, A.M. Antifungal activity of bacillus species against Fusarium and analysis of the potential mechanisms used in biocontrol. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Yeo, W.-S.; Anokwute, C.; Marcadis, P.; Levitan, M.; Ahmed, M.; Bae, Y.; Kim, K.; Kostrominova, T.; Liu, Q.; Bae, T. A membrane-bound transcription factor is proteolytically regulated by the AAA+ protease FtsH in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 2020, 202, e00019-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Liu, T.; Xue, S. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) signaling in plant development and stress responses. aBIOTECH 2021, 2, 32–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Iqbal, S.; Ullah, N.; Janjua, H.A. In vitro evaluation and genome mining of Bacillus subtilis strain RS10 reveals its biocontrol and plant growth-promoting potential. Agriculture 2021, 11, 1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Khezri, M.; Jouzani, G.S.; Ahmadzadeh, M. Fusarium culmorum affects expression of biofilm formation key genes in Bacillus subtilis. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Knights, H.E.; Jorrin, B.; Haskett, T.L.; Poole, P.S. Deciphering bacterial mechanisms of root colonization. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2021, 13, 428–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ciccoritti, R.; Pasquini, M.; Sgrulletta, D.; Nocente, F. Effect of 5-n-alkylresorcinol extracts from durum wheat whole grain on the growth of fusarium head blight (FHB) causal agents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Williams, J.C.; Sheldon, J.R.; Imlay, H.D.; Dutter, B.F.; Draelos, M.M.; Skaar, E.P.; Sulikowski, G.A. Synthesis of the siderophore coelichelin and its utility as a probe in the study of bacterial metal sensing and response. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 679–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Benaud, N.; Edwards, R.J.; Amos, T.G.; D’Agostino, P.M.; Gutiérrez-Chávez, C.; Montgomery, K.; Nicetic, I.; Ferrari, B.C. Antarctic desert soil bacteria exhibit high novel natural product potential, evaluated through long-read genome sequencing and comparative genomics. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 3646–3664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aeny, T.N.; Prasetyo, J.; Suharjo, R.; Dirmawati, S.R.; Efri, E.; Niswati, A. Isolation and identification of actinomycetes potential as the antagonist of Dickeya zeae pineapple soft rot in Lampung, Indonesia. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2018, 19, 2052–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sadeghian, M.; Shahidi Bonjar, G.H.; Sharifi Sirchi, G.R. Post harvest biological control of apple bitter rot by soil-borne actinomycetes and molecular identification of the active antagonist. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 112, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Anggelina, A.; Pringgenies, D.; Setyati, W. Presence of biosynthetic gene clusters (NRPS/PKS) in actinomycetes of mangrove sediment in Semarang and Karimunjawa, Indonesia. Environ. Nat. Resour. J. 2021, 19, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Silveira, M.A.V.; Batista dos Santos, S.M.; Okamoto, D.N.; de Melo, I.S.; Juliano, M.A.; Ribeiro Chagas, J.; Vasconcellos, S.P. Atlantic Forest’s and Caatinga’s semiarid soils and their potential as a source for halothermotolerant actinomycetes and proteolytic enzymes. Environ. Technol. 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chen, Y.; Shafi, J.; Li, M.; Fu, D.; Ji, M. Insecticidal activity of endophytic actinomycetes isolated from Azadirachta indica against Myzus persicae. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2018, 70, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Song, L.; Jiang, N.; Wei, S.; Lan, Z.; Pan, L. Isolation, screening, and identification of actinomycetes with antifungal and enzyme activity assays against Colletotrichum dematium of Sarcandra glabra. Mycobiology 2020, 48, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Xiong, Z.-Q.; Tu, X.-R.; Wei, S.-J.; Huang, L.; Li, X.-H.; Lu, H.; Tu, G.-Q. In vitro antifungal activity of antifungalmycin 702, a new polyene macrolide antibiotic, against the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 35, 1475–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, H.; Zhou, H.; Bai, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Ma, Q.; Qu, Y. Biosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles mediated by fungus Mariannaea sp. HJ and their characterization. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 571, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dong, X.; Cai, M. Handbook of Identification of Common Bacterial Systems, 1st ed.; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2001; pp. 370–387. [Google Scholar]
  63. Passari, A.K.; Mishra, V.K.; Leo, V.V.; Gupta, V.K.; Singh, B.P. Phytohormone production endowed with antagonistic potential and plant growth promoting abilities of culturable endophytic bacteria isolated from Clerodendrum colebrookianum Walp. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 193, 57–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ait Bahadou, S.; Ouijja, A.; Karfach, A.; Tahiri, A.; Lahlali, R. New potential bacterial antagonists for the biocontrol of fire blight disease (Erwinia amylovora) in Morocco. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 117, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Agarwal, M.; Dheeman, S.; Dubey, R.C.; Kumar, P.; Maheshwari, D.K.; Bajpai, V.K. Differential antagonistic responses of Bacillus pumilus MSUA3 against Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum causing fungal diseases in Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 205, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Aboelnour, A.; Noreldin, A.E.; Massoud, D.; Abumandour, M.M. Retinal characterization in the eyes of two bats endemic in the Egyptian fauna, the Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) and insectivorous bat (Pipistrellus kuhlii), using the light microscope and transmission electron microscope. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2020, 83, 1391–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mishra, P.; Mishra, J.; Dwivedi, S.K.; Arora, N.K. Microbial enzymes in biocontrol of phytopathogens. In Microbial Enzymes: Roles and Applications in Industries; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 259–285. [Google Scholar]
  68. Lau, E.T.; Tani, A.; Khew, C.Y.; Chua, Y.Q.; Hwang, S.S. Plant growth-promoting bacteria as potential bio-inoculants and biocontrol agents to promote black pepper plant cultivation. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 240, 126549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Putri, R.E.; Mubarik, N.R.; Ambarsari, L.; Wahyudi, A.T. Antagonistic activity of glucanolytic bacteria Bacillus subtilis W3. 15 against Fusarium oxysporum and its enzyme characterization. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2021, 22, 4067–4077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Prajapati, V.; Patel, S.; Ray, S.; Patel, K.C. Identification of protease enzymes involved in biocontrol activity. In Practical Handbook on Agricultural Microbiology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 323–329. [Google Scholar]
  71. Sukmawati, D.; Sondana, G.A.; Fikriyyah, N.N.; Afifah, Z.N.; Firhandini, A.; Khumaiya, U.; Komsiatun, D.A.; Asmara, Y.T.; Supiyani, A.; Puspitaningrum, R.; et al. Cellulase-producing yeast isolated from fermented cocoa beans as biocontrol for pathogenic mold chocolate fruit collected from Sentul, Jawa Barat, Indonesia. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1869, 012043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Suárez-Moreno, Z.R.; Vinchira-Villarraga, D.M.; Vergara-Morales, D.I.; Castellanos, L.; Ramos, F.A.; Guarnaccia, C.; Degrassi, G.; Venturi, V.; Moreno-Sarmiento, N. Plant-growth promotion and biocontrol properties of three Streptomyces spp. isolates to control bacterial rice pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Chengqun, L.; Baoling, H. Isolation and characterization of Azotobacteria from pine rhizosphere. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 4, 1299–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dubey, A.; Saiyam, D.; Kumar, A.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Khan, M.L. Bacterial root endophytes: Characterization of their competence and plant growth promotion in Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under drought stress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sheng, M.M.; Jia, H.K.; Zhang, G.Y.; Zeng, L.N.; Zhang, T.T.; Long, Y.H.; Lan, J.; Hu, Z.Q.; Zeng, Z.; Wang, B.; et al. Siderophore production by rhizosphere biological control bacteria Brevibacillus brevis GZDF3 of Pinellia ternata and its antifungal effects on Candida albicans. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 689–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mohammed, B.L.; Hussein, R.A.; Toama, F.N. Biological control of Fusarium wilt in tomato by endophytic rhizobactria. Energy Procedia 2019, 157, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chin, C.-S.; Alexander, D.H.; Marks, P.; Klammer, A.A.; Drake, J.; Heiner, C.; Clum, A.; Copeland, A.; Huddleston, J.; Eichler, E.E.; et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Koren, S.; Walenz, B.P.; Berlin, K.; Miller, J.R.; Bergman, N.H.; Phillippy, A.M. Canu: Scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017, 27, 722–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Walker, B.J.; Abeel, T.; Shea, T.; Priest, M.; Abouelliel, A.; Sakthikumar, S.; Cuomo, C.A.; Zeng, Q.; Wortman, J.; Young, S.K.; et al. Pilon: An integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Delcher, A.L.; Bratke, K.A.; Powers, E.C.; Salzberg, S.L. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Griffiths-Jones, S.; Bateman, A.; Marshall, M.; Khanna, A.; Eddy, S.R. Rfam: An RNA family database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 439–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Alkhnbashi, O.S.; Meier, T.; Mitrofanov, A.; Backofen, R.; Voss, B. CRISPR-Cas bioinformatics. Methods 2020, 172, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Xu, W.; Zhang, L.; Goodwin, P.H.; Xia, M.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Q.; Liang, J.; Sun, R.; Wu, C.; Yang, L. Isolation, identification, and complete genome assembly of an endophytic Bacillus velezensis YB-130, potential biocontrol agent against Fusarium graminearum. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 598285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Park, B.H.; Karpinets, T.V.; Syed, M.H.; Leuze, M.R.; Uberbacher, E.C. CAZymes Analysis Toolkit (CAT): Web service for searching and analyzing carbohydrate-active enzymes in a newly sequenced organism using CAZy database. Glycobiology 2010, 20, 1574–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Grant, J.R.; Stothard, P. The CGView Server: A comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, W181–W184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Antagonism of the strain on four pathogenic bacteria in PDA culture medium for approximately 10 days: (1) F. oxysporum, (2) F. solani, (3) P. citrinum, and (4) P. citreosulfuratum. (A) control and (B) treated.
Figure 1. Antagonism of the strain on four pathogenic bacteria in PDA culture medium for approximately 10 days: (1) F. oxysporum, (2) F. solani, (3) P. citrinum, and (4) P. citreosulfuratum. (A) control and (B) treated.
Pathogens 11 01195 g001
Figure 2. (1) SEM observation of F. oxysporum. (2) TEM observation of F. oxysporum: (A) contrast and (B) experimental. Hyphae were thick, with a smooth surface, nearly round in cross-section, and clear in cell structure (arrowhead in 1A). Hyphae were distorted, shriveled, and shrunken (arrowheads in 1B). The cytoplasm was turbid and chaotic; the cell walls, cell membranes, and dysplasia were evident in vacuoles (arrowhead in 2B), compared to the contrast (arrowhead 2A).
Figure 2. (1) SEM observation of F. oxysporum. (2) TEM observation of F. oxysporum: (A) contrast and (B) experimental. Hyphae were thick, with a smooth surface, nearly round in cross-section, and clear in cell structure (arrowhead in 1A). Hyphae were distorted, shriveled, and shrunken (arrowheads in 1B). The cytoplasm was turbid and chaotic; the cell walls, cell membranes, and dysplasia were evident in vacuoles (arrowhead in 2B), compared to the contrast (arrowhead 2A).
Pathogens 11 01195 g002
Figure 3. Morphology of S. yangpuensis CM253. (A) Colony morphology on ISP3 medium: the single colony is nearly round, slightly convex, dry, with a white aerial hypha, and a pale-yellow basal mycelium. (B) Microscopic morphology: the hyphae are helical rods.
Figure 3. Morphology of S. yangpuensis CM253. (A) Colony morphology on ISP3 medium: the single colony is nearly round, slightly convex, dry, with a white aerial hypha, and a pale-yellow basal mycelium. (B) Microscopic morphology: the hyphae are helical rods.
Pathogens 11 01195 g003
Figure 4. S. yangpuensis CM253 genome circle diagram: From the outside to the inside, the first circle and the fourth circle are CDS on the positive chain and negative chain, and different colors indicate different COG functional classifications. The second circle and the third circle are CDS, tRNA, and rRNA, on the positive chain and negative chain, respectively. The fifth circle is GC content, and the sixth circle is GC-skew value.
Figure 4. S. yangpuensis CM253 genome circle diagram: From the outside to the inside, the first circle and the fourth circle are CDS on the positive chain and negative chain, and different colors indicate different COG functional classifications. The second circle and the third circle are CDS, tRNA, and rRNA, on the positive chain and negative chain, respectively. The fifth circle is GC content, and the sixth circle is GC-skew value.
Pathogens 11 01195 g004
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of house-keeping genes of strain CM253. A phylogenetic tree was built, based on the neighbor-joining (NJ) method, using MEGA 6.0 software, based on 31 house-keeping genes (dnaG, frr, infC, nusA, pgk, pyrG, rplA, rplB, rplC, rplD, rplE, rplF, rplK, rplL, rplM, rplN, rplP, rplS, rplT, rpmA, rpoB, rpsB, rpsC, rpsE, rpsI, rpsJ, rpsK, rpsM, rpsS, smpB, and tsf). The numbers at the nodes indicate the levels of bootstrap support (%), based on 1000 reassembled datasets.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of house-keeping genes of strain CM253. A phylogenetic tree was built, based on the neighbor-joining (NJ) method, using MEGA 6.0 software, based on 31 house-keeping genes (dnaG, frr, infC, nusA, pgk, pyrG, rplA, rplB, rplC, rplD, rplE, rplF, rplK, rplL, rplM, rplN, rplP, rplS, rplT, rpmA, rpoB, rpsB, rpsC, rpsE, rpsI, rpsJ, rpsK, rpsM, rpsS, smpB, and tsf). The numbers at the nodes indicate the levels of bootstrap support (%), based on 1000 reassembled datasets.
Pathogens 11 01195 g005
Figure 6. GO function classification of S. yangpuensis CM253.
Figure 6. GO function classification of S. yangpuensis CM253.
Pathogens 11 01195 g006
Figure 7. COG function classification of S. yangpuensis CM253.
Figure 7. COG function classification of S. yangpuensis CM253.
Pathogens 11 01195 g007
Figure 8. KEGG function classification of S. yangpuensis CM253.
Figure 8. KEGG function classification of S. yangpuensis CM253.
Pathogens 11 01195 g008
Figure 9. Gene count distributions of carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZy) families.
Figure 9. Gene count distributions of carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZy) families.
Pathogens 11 01195 g009
Table 1. Hydrolytic enzyme and PGP activities of S. yangpuensis CM253.
Table 1. Hydrolytic enzyme and PGP activities of S. yangpuensis CM253.
Hydrolytic Enzyme and PGP ActivitiesResult
Chitinase
Cellulase+
Protease+
Glucanase+
IAA production+
Phosphate solubilization
NH3 production+
ACC deaminase enzyme+
Potassium dissolution
Siderophore production+
Abbreviations: +—positive for test; −—negative for test.
Table 2. Physiological and biochemical characteristics of S. yangpuensis CM253.
Table 2. Physiological and biochemical characteristics of S. yangpuensis CM253.
Physiological and Biochemical CharacterizationResult
Gram reaction+
Growth at 4 °C
Growth at 4 °C
Oxidase
Catalase
Urease+
Lipase+
Voges–Proskauer
Methyl red
Starch hydrolysis
Gelatin liquefaction
Nitrate reduction+
Citrate utilization
H2S production+
Milk coagulation
Abbreviations: +—positive for test; −—negative for test.
Table 3. Results of the antimicrobial gene clusters in the CM253 genome.
Table 3. Results of the antimicrobial gene clusters in the CM253 genome.
RegionTypeStartEndSimilar ClusterSimilarity
1Lanthipeptide2389845961Venezuelin100%
2Lanthipeptide5265177063-
3Terpene427823452809Carotenoid63%
4NRPS475101526320Deimino-antipain66%
5T2PKS529223601766Spore pigment66%
6NRPS897035964537JBIR-126100%
7Siderophore27164642727579Desferrioxamin B/Desferrioxamine E83%
8NRPS40160034057260Phosphonoglycans3%
9Siderophore55600825573594--
10Bacteriocin58696885881185--
11Terpene59648275986769Toxoflavin/fervenulin14%
12T1PKS60145316059440Herboxidiene9%
13Terpene63082856335005Hopene61%
14NRPS-like65266086569022Polyketomycin4%
15NRPS67049686745944Streptothricin87%
16Terpene68380516857502
17NRPS68607616911849Coelichelin100%
18Terpene69375526957566Ebelactone5%
19Terpene70072077028140Monensin5%
20Melanin70313807057085Istamycin4%
21T1PKS70573997102148Daptomycin4%
22Siderophore71381547151437
23T3PKS71846577225715Alkylresorcinol100%
24CDPS72377607287223Cosmomycin C5%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, L.; Hu, S.; Wang, X.; Guo, Y.; Huang, L.; Wang, L.; Li, W. Antagonism of Rhizosphere Streptomyces yangpuensis CM253 against the Pathogenic Fungi Causing Corm Rot in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Pathogens 2022, 11, 1195. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101195

AMA Style

Tian L, Hu S, Wang X, Guo Y, Huang L, Wang L, Li W. Antagonism of Rhizosphere Streptomyces yangpuensis CM253 against the Pathogenic Fungi Causing Corm Rot in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Pathogens. 2022; 11(10):1195. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101195

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Li, Shuang Hu, Xingxing Wang, Yingqiu Guo, Luyang Huang, Lili Wang, and Wankui Li. 2022. "Antagonism of Rhizosphere Streptomyces yangpuensis CM253 against the Pathogenic Fungi Causing Corm Rot in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.)" Pathogens 11, no. 10: 1195. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101195

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop