Next Article in Journal
Lessons from SARS-CoV-2 Pandemics: How Restrictive Measures Impacted the Trend of Respiratory Infections in Neonates and Infants up to Three Months of Age
Next Article in Special Issue
European Hares, Lepus europaeus, Represent a Reservoir Host for Thelazia callipaeda in Romania
Previous Article in Journal
Not Only Leptotrombidium spp. an Annotated Checklist of Chigger Mites (Actinotrichida: Trombiculidae) Associated with Bacterial Pathogens
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ovarian Filariasis in a Wild Southern Tamandua (Tamanduatetradactyla; Mammalia: Myrmecophagidae)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Survey of Helminths of Dogs in Rural and Urban Areas of Uzbekistan and the Zoonotic Risk to Human Population

Pathogens 2022, 11(10), 1085; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101085
by Alisher Safarov 1,*, Andrei D. Mihalca 2, Gab-Man Park 3, Firuza Akramova 4, Angela M. Ionică 5, Otayorjon Abdinabiev 6, Georgiana Deak 2 and Djalaliddin Azimov 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Pathogens 2022, 11(10), 1085; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101085
Submission received: 25 August 2022 / Revised: 8 September 2022 / Accepted: 20 September 2022 / Published: 23 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pets, Wildlife and Parasites)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please use italic in latin genus/species names throughout the whole text in lines: 24-31, 113-120, 133-134, 139, 144-146, 161-162, 168-169, 171, 178-179, 185, 188-189.

Repace historical name Trichocephalus vulpis for Trichuris vulpis in the text and tables.

Line 26: T. pisiformis

Line 44: ...different parasitic pathogens...

Line 45: ...with canine excreta,...

Line 46:  ...canids meat, which is a culinary habit in some regions....

Line 54: Please change because: "the lack of effective anthelmintic treatment and the absence of parasitological surveys" are not "the main risk factors for human infections with parasites transmitted by dogs"

Line 70: Uzbekistan, to implement activities for minimizing the risks...

Line 96: 600C

Table 2 and 3: Toxoascaris leonina

Line187: ...indicates that the risk of zoonotic helminths in dogs has expanded.

Line 217: Given the high prevalence of zoonotic nematodes in dogs, it.

Line 232: ... to teach the public the rules

Lines 234-236: improve. The example below.

Knowledge of the epidemiology of the main helminths in dogs is extremely important for conducting scientifically based implementation of anthelminthic measures. Prevention of parasite infections in dogs is an important element to secure human health.

 

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1 Comments

 

Point 1: Please use italic in latin genus/species names throughout the whole text in lines: 24-31, 113-120, 133-134, 139, 144-146, 161-162, 168-169, 171, 178-179, 185, 188-189.

Response 1: Corrected

 

Point 2: Repace historical name Trichocephalus vulpis for Trichuris vulpis in the text and tables..

Response 2: Corrected

 

Point 3: Line 26: T. pisiformis

Response 3: Corrected

 

Point 4: Line 44: ...different parasitic pathogens...

Response 4: Corrected

 

Point 5: Line 45: ...with canine excreta,..

Response 5: Corrected

 

Point 6: Line 46:  ...canids meat, which is a culinary habit in some regions....

Response 6: Corrected

 

Point 7: Line 54: Please change because: "the lack of effective anthelmintic treatment and the absence of parasitological surveys" are not "the main risk factors for human infections with parasites transmitted by dogs"

Response 7: This was rephrased.

 

Point 8: Line 70: Uzbekistan, to implement activities for minimizing the risks...

Response8: Corrected

 

Point 9: Line 96: 600C

Response9: Corrected

 

Point 10: Table 2 and 3: Toxoascaris leonina

Response10: Corrected

 

Point 11: Line187: ...indicates that the risk of zoonotic helminths in dogs has expanded.

Response11: Corrected

 

Point 12: Line 217: Given the high prevalence of zoonotic nematodes in dogs, it.

Response12: Corrected

 

Point 13: Line 232: ... to teach the public the rules

Response 13: Corrected

 

Point 14: Lines 234-236: improve. The example below.

Response 14: This was rephrased. Thank you!

Reviewer 2 Report

See attached pdf file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2 Comments

 

Point 1: Line 3: change ''in'' to ''to''

Response 1: Corrected

 

Point 2: Line 18: delete with, and change to " some of which ''have'' zoonotic potential

Response 2: Corrected

 

Point 3: Line 18: add ''."

Response 3: Corrected

 

Point 4: Line 21: state specific period, eg March 2016 to June 2022.

Response 4: Corrected

 

Point 5: Line 21: mention how the various helminth species were identified. Morphological keys? etc

Response 5: Corrected

 

Point 6: Line 24-31: All these are not essential here. Instead mention the zoonotic species and risk factors.

Response 6: Corrected

 

Point 7: Line 34: add- necropsy

Response 7: Corrected

 

Point 8: Line 43: change ''which'' to ''them''

Response8: Corrected

 

Point 9: Line 51: ---- and Trichinella spp.

Response9: Corrected

 

Point 10: Line 56: Do you mean there have been no parasitological surveys of dog helminths in the country since 1975? If not, then modify this statement.

Response10: Yes, it is right. There are no complex studies of the helminth fauna of dogs since 1975

 

Point 11: Line 62: After writing the full names once, you abbreviate subsequently eg, E. granuosus, D. caninum etc.

Response11: Corrected

 

Point 12: Line 64: indicate the direction of the change in dog population; increase or decrease, and the level of veterinary/health care and dog management in the country

Response12: Corrected, it has been shown that the number of dogs has increased.

 

Point 13: Line 80: see earlier comments

Response 13: Corrected

 

Point 14: Lines 96:

Response 14: Corrected

 

Point 15: Line 97: not correct spelling

Response 13: Corrected

 

Point 15: Lines 109: test not testing

Response 14: Corrected

 

Point 17: Line 113: be consistent; you used class earlier.

Response 13: Corrected

 

Point 18: Lines 127: Tables 1-3 are too crowded and makes it a bit clumpsy. Authors need to reduce the font size, use abbreviation in names such that each raw stand out separately. also authors are encouraged to check and corrcer the spelling of the parasite names throughout the manuscript. wrong spellings are found in several places.

Response 14: Corrected. The tables have been corrected, the font size has been reduced, and the names of species have been shortened. Technical errors in the species names have been fixed.

 

Point 19: Lines 109: test not testing

Response 14: Corrected

 

Point 20: Line 135 and 142: Authors did well by providing pictographs. However, it will good for them to point out (using arrows) the key diagnostic features that enabled them to confirm identity of the helminths. Same for figure 1.

Response 20: Corrected

 

Point 21: Line 144-146: use abbreviations

Response 21: Corrected

 

Point 22: Line 155: move this to the left, to appear under variables.

Response 22: Corrected

 

Point 23: Line 156: rephrase this section please

Response 23: Corrected, newly edited

 

Point 24: Line 194: I am not conversant with this term. please can the authors explain?

Response 24: “metaphylactic” - Mass medication of a group of animals, in advance of an expected outbreak of disease.

 

Point 25: Line 221

Response 25: Corrected

 

Point 26: Line 232: change ''teach'' to ''educate''

Response 26: Corrected

 

Point 27: Line 236: Authors should mention the limitation of the study. The parasite identification was based on the use of morphological keys which is not very accurate especially for species idenification. This should be highlighted.

Response 27: This was mentioned in the conclusion section.

 

Point 28: Line 263: not cited in the text

Response 28: Corrected. Excluded from the list of references

 

Point 29: Line 303: not in the text

Response 29: Corrected. Excluded from the list of references

 

Point 30: Line 305: not in the text

Response 30: Corrected. Excluded from the list of references

 

Point 31: Line 318: not cited in the MS

Response 31: Corrected. Excluded from the list of references

 

Point 32: Line 325: not cited in text

Response 32: Corrected. Excluded from the list of references

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

No comments to the authors 

Back to TopTop