Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of “Caterina assay”: An Alternative Tool to the Commercialized Kits Used for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Identification
Next Article in Special Issue
Bartonella henselae Antibodies in Serum and Oral Fluid Specimens from Cats
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Detection of Selected Pathogens with Zoonotic Potential in Deer Keds (Lipoptena fortisetosa)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bartonella Associated Cutaneous Lesions (BACL) in People with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/pathogens10030326
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bartonella henselae Detected in Malignant Melanoma, a Preliminary Study

by
Marna E. Ericson
1,
Edward B. Breitschwerdt
2,
Paul Reicherter
3,
Cole Maxwell
4,
Ricardo G. Maggi
2,
Richard G. Melvin
5,
Azar H. Maluki
4,6,
Julie M. Bradley
2,
Jennifer C. Miller
7,
Glenn E. Simmons, Jr.
5,
Jamie Dencklau
4,
Keaton Joppru
5,
Jack Peterson
4,
Will Bae
4,
Janet Scanlon
4 and
Lynne T. Bemis
5,*
1
T Lab Inc., 910 Clopper Road, Suite 220S, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA
2
Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Comparative Medicine Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA
3
Dermatology Clinic, Truman Medical Center, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA
4
Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
5
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Duluth Campus, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
6
Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, University of Kufa, Kufa 54003, Iraq
7
Galaxy Diagnostics Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(3), 326; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030326
Submission received: 18 December 2020 / Revised: 4 March 2021 / Accepted: 8 March 2021 / Published: 10 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Evolving Biomedical Importance of Bartonella Species Infections)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bartonella bacilliformis (B. bacilliformis), Bartonella henselae (B. henselae), and Bartonella quintana (B. quintana) are bacteria known to cause verruga peruana or bacillary angiomatosis, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-dependent cutaneous lesions in humans. Given the bacteria’s association with the dermal niche and clinical suspicion of occult infection by a dermatologist, we determined if patients with melanoma had evidence of Bartonella spp. infection. Within a one-month period, eight patients previously diagnosed with melanoma volunteered to be tested for evidence of Bartonella spp. exposure/infection. Subsequently, confocal immunohistochemistry and PCR for Bartonella spp. were used to study melanoma tissues from two patients. Blood from seven of the eight patients was either seroreactive, PCR positive, or positive by both modalities for Bartonella spp. exposure. Subsequently, Bartonella organisms that co-localized with VEGFC immunoreactivity were visualized using multi-immunostaining confocal microscopy of thick skin sections from two patients. Using a co-culture model, B. henselae was observed to enter melanoma cell cytoplasm and resulted in increased vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) production. Findings from this small number of patients support the need for future investigations to determine the extent to which Bartonella spp. are a component of the melanoma pathobiome.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Malignant melanoma is the sixth most common cancer reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group). Cutaneous melanoma maybe caused by a combination of sun exposure, genetic factors, and (as yet) unidentified environmental triggers [1]. An umbrella study of meta-analyses found that multiple phenotypic and environmental factors have been associated with the development of cutaneous melanoma, but collectively these studies suffer from heterogeneity and small study effects [2]. The meta-analyses indicate that, although genetic factors and UV irradiation are clearly part of the etiology of melanoma, there could be as yet unknown factors impacting the development of cutaneous melanoma [2].
Signatures of bacterial infection, including detection of DNA, RNA, and lipopolysaccharides, have been reported in many human solid tumors [3]. Recent studies indicate the association between bacteria and the tumor microbiome is complex and remains poorly understood [3,4,5]. Importantly, approximately 16% of human malignancies worldwide are linked to an infectious agent [6]. In the context of bacterial infections, previous studies have linked Helicobacter pylori to gastric cancer, Chlamydia pneumoniae with lung cancer, and Salmonella typhi with gallbladder cancer [7]. More recent studies suggest that Streptococcus bovis is associated with colorectal cancer [8,9]. With the advent of next generation sequencing (NGS) a tumor microenvironment pathobiome is being elucidated [10,11]. In the context of disease pathogenesis and potentially carcinogenesis, it is possible that specific microorganisms transition microbiomes to pathobiomes [11]. Recent studies in mice also suggest that the gut microbiome may influence the therapeutic response for cancers in locations distant from the gut [12,13]. Similarly, studies focusing on alterations of the gut microbiome in melanoma patients have documented variation in the melanoma treatment response to programed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors [14,15]. An early report about the microbiome on the outermost layer of the skin, the stratum corneum, by Salava et al., used noninvasive skin swabs of melanomas compared to the swab microbiome of benign nevi [16]. They reported minimal differences in the stratum corneum microbiome between cancer and benign nevi, although melanoma samples seemed to have slightly less microbiome diversity. In contrast, a study using a pig melanoma model found that microbiome diversity in full thickness biopsies from non-lesional skin had a significantly different microbiome from that observed in melanoma tissue [17]. That study examined a limited number of bacterial species and did not include Bartonella. Importantly, there are numerous defined mechanism by which bacteria could contribute to the development of cancer [18].
Bartonella spp. are emergent and neglected bacteria of worldwide distribution [19]. In humans, Bartonella spp. cause neurological symptoms, endocarditis, bacillary angiomatosis, bacillary peliosis, trench fever, and cat-scratch disease [20,21,22]. Bartonellosis is potentially fatal, especially in immunodeficient individuals [23]. Historically, persistent bloodstream infection has been documented in association with B. bacilliformis in patients with verruga peruana, after acquiring the infection via cutaneous sand fly bites in South America [24]. Persistent bloodstream infection with B. henselae has also been confirmed in association with immunocompromised cutaneous bacillary angiomatosis patients infected with HIV [25], potentially acquired by a cutaneous cat scratch or inoculation of flea feces subcutaneously. It is now increasingly clear that Bartonella spp. can induce chronic intravascular infections in humans, including symptomatic and healthy immunocompetent individuals [26,27,28]. In recent years, documentation of persistent bloodstream infection has been reported in “immunocompetent” blood donors and healthy veterinary workers [29,30]. What remains incompletely understood is the biological consequences of persistent bloodstream infection. Moreover, the extent to which long-standing dermal infection with these bacteria persists in the subcutaneous tissues of human beings is unknown. As stealth bacterial pathogens, a comparative medicine approach may facilitate enhanced understanding of the pathophysiology of Bartonellosis across animal species [20,29]. For example, bacillary angiomatosis, cutaneous panniculitis, and vasculitis involving the dermis occurs in both dogs and humans infected with Bartonella spp. [19,29,31]. Mechanistically, Bartonella spp. increase vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC) secretion in association with cutaneous vasoproliferative tumor growth (bacillary angiomatosis, peliosis hepatis), which is also an important melanoma growth factor [18,32]. In this report, we describe Bartonella spp. exposure and infection in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma. Our findings support the need for future studies to determine if Bartonella spp. are a prevalent component of the skin microbiome or if these bacteria contribute to the pathobiome leading to melanoma.

2. Results

2.1. Demographics of Melanoma Patients

Demographic information, year of diagnosis, and patient reported co-morbidities for the eight malignant melanoma patients are included in Table 1. All participants volunteered for the study during August 2012 and were living in Oregon at the time of initial diagnosis; most had lived in Oregon for all (or a large portion) of their lives. Three had developed metastatic disease. All but one younger patient reported co-morbidities.

2.2. Bartonella spp. Seroreactivity, Enrichment Blood Culture, and PCR

Bartonella spp. serology and Bartonella Alphaproteobacteria growth medium (BAPGM) enrichment blood culture PCR results are summarized in Table 2. In 2012, at North Carolina State University, B. henselae DNA was amplified and sequenced from blood or from BAPGM enrichment blood cultures from 3 of 8 melanoma patients (patients 2, 4, and 7). All patient DNA was subjected to both qPCR and conventional PCR (cPCR). Five patients were Bartonella spp. seroreactive, only one of whom was PCR/DNA sequence positive for B. henselae. The two remaining B. henselae PCR positive patients were immunofluorescence antibody assay (IFA) non-seroreactive at all screening dilutions to all four Bartonella spp. test antigens.
Previously, collected formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) melanoma biopsy tissue from patients 4 and 7 were retrievable for hemi-nested PCR conducted at the University of Minnesota. B. henselae DNA was PCR amplified and sequenced from FFPE melanoma tissue blocks from patients 4 and 7.

2.3. Confocal Immunohistochemistry of Melanoma Tissues

Tissue sections from two patients, 4 and 7, FFPE tissue blocks were immunostained and examined using previously validated imaging protocols [33,34]. Sections were multi-stained with a vascular biomarker anti-collagen-type 4, a lymphatic vessel biomarker (anti-LYVE1), VEGFC, anti-B. henselae, and a DNA stain for tissue localization. The dermal-epidermal boundary was disrupted as revealed by a diffuse staining pattern of collagen-type 4 immunostaining (data not shown).
By immunostaining, B. henselae and VEGF co-localized in the melanoma tissues from patients 4 and 7 (Figure 1). Merged images of B. henselae immunoreactivity revealed a close association of the bacteria with pro-angiogenic VEGFC within dermal lymphatic vessels (Figure 1, merged). Bartonella henselae-immunoreactivity was not visualized in the epidermis.
In general, Bartonella spp. immunoreactivity was distributed in close association with the melanoma cells and dermal lymphatics. There was no endogenous tissue fluorescence using no-primary-no-secondary-antibody controls; and no non-specific binding was detected when only the secondary antibody was used in the staining protocol (controls are included in Figure S1).

2.4. Co-Culture of B. henselae with Melanoma Cells (A375)

Bartonella henselae is an intracellular bacterium that induces expression of VEGFC [35,36,37]. Additionally, Bartonella spp. are known to cause vasoproliferative lesions in the human host [38]. A co-culture model was developed to determine if B. henselae altered the biological behavior of cultured melanoma cells (Figure 2b). Melanoma cells inoculated with a live culture of B. henselae American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), # 49882, Houston-1), had shorter dendritic processes as compared to non-infected melanoma cells (Figure 2a).
In a first step to determine if the bacteria are in melanoma cells, a three-dimensional (3D)-video of the co-culture was generated (Figure 3, Supplementary Materials).

2.5. Cytokine Analysis of Melanoma A375 Cells Co-Infected with B. henselae

Bartonella henselae co-cultured with melanoma cells induced production of VEGFC and interleukin 8 (IL-8) (Figure 4). VEGFC was significantly upregulated at 24 h in B. henselae-infected melanoma cells as compared to melanoma cells alone (Figure 4a). IL-8 cytokine expression was significantly increased at 24 h of incubation in B. henselae co-cultures (Figure 4c).

3. Discussion

This study provides, serological and enrichment blood culture/PCR evidence that a subset of melanoma patients have been exposed to or are infected with B. henselae. Importantly, B. henselae DNA was amplified and sequenced from enrichment blood cultures from patients 4 and 7 at North Carolina State University, and again years later from FFPE melanoma tissues at the University of Minnesota. For both of these patients, there was a 4-year time span between the initial tissue biopsy and the documentation of blood borne B. henselae infection.
Bartonella henselae DNA was amplified and sequenced from the blood or BAPGM enrichment blood cultures of three patients, two of whom were not seroreactive to any of the four Bartonella spp. IFA antigens. Previous studies have confirmed variation in the sensitivity of IFA assays depending upon the strain type used as antigen [30,37]. In addition, and for reasons that lack clarity, a subset of patients with persistent Bartonella spp. bloodstream infections can be seronegative to the infecting species and strain used for IFA testing [39,40]. Whether this is a laboratory phenomenon (lack of IFA-assay sensitivity) or a patient phenomenon (anergy) remains unclear.
It is well documented that Bartonella spp. can be difficult to detect by standard microscopic histopathological techniques [41]. In this study of two FFPE melanoma tissues, confocal immunohistochemistry supported the localization of Bartonella spp. in the dermal lymphatics. Interestingly, Hong and colleagues using an experimental rat infection study found that B. tribocorum first invades the cutaneous lymphatics, prior to establishing intraerythrocytic and endothelial cell infections [42]. In melanoma tissue, immunoreactive-Bartonella spp. appeared to co-localize with VEGFC within the lymphatic vessels. Interestingly, in addition to promoting endothelial cell proliferation, VEGFC plays a dominant role in lymphatic vessel growth [43]. Uniquely several Bartonella spp., including B. henselae, stimulate VEGF production resulting in the proliferation of blood vessels [44,45], which is also a hallmark of malignant melanoma [46]. In vitro infection of melanoma cell cultures with B. henselae also resulted in changes in cell morphology (Figure 2). The mechanism of bacterial entry into the melanoma cells, as compared to invasome-mediated entry of B. henselae into endothelial cells [47], deserves future study.
Bartonella spp. infection is associated with increased pro-angiogenic cytokine expression as well as inhibition of apoptosis in endothelial cells [48,49]. The finding that VEGFC is upregulated in melanoma cells co-cultured with B. henselae is similar to previously reported studies of B. henselae co-cultures with endothelial or HeLa cells [47,49,50]. Bartonella henselae has also been shown to increase IL-8 expression in endothelial cell lines [51]. Similarly, IL-8 levels increased in B. henselae-inoculated melanoma cell media compared to melanoma cells alone.
The initial 2012 microbiological results reported in this study were remarkable and unexpected. Subsequent collaborative efforts with confocal imaging and the development of the melanoma/B. henselae co-culture model, which spanned several years, further supported a potential role for Bartonella infection in the pathogenesis of melanoma in a subset of patients. There are several limitations associated with this study. As the eight study participants were from the same geographic location and all were tested in the same month of August, these results cannot be extrapolated to other melanoma patients or other geographic locations. As all patients were diagnosed with melanoma years before study entry, and because recent studies have found Bartonella spp. bloodstream infections in healthy individuals [30], the medical relevance of the association of this genus of bacteria with melanoma awaits future studies. In addition to the small number of study participants, only two FFPE tissue blocks were retrievable, limiting documentation of tumor-associated Bartonella spp. DNA, as well as potential visualization of bacteria within the tumor. Only a limited number of cytokine studies were performed with the newly developed B. henselae/co-culture model, clearly an opportunity for future utilization of this cell culture infection model.
In conclusion, the results generated in this study may prove to be of potential importance to future investigations of melanoma carcinogenesis. It is possible that vector transmitted Bartonella spp. are a potential component of a microbial pathobiome in a subset of melanoma patients. The B. henselae-A375 melanoma co-culture model can be used in future studies to characterize impacts of Bartonella infection on melanoma pathogenesis. Most importantly, this initial observational study provides the background and justification for future funded studies, addressing the impact of Bartonella spp. as part of the cutaneous microbiome or melanoma pathobiome.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Timeline

Given the documented association of Bartonella spp. with cutaneous vasoproliferative lesions, panniculitis and rash, and based upon his clinical suspicion, Dr. Paul Reicherter (dermatologist) contacted Dr. Breitschwerdt (infectious disease researcher) to pose the question: “Could Bartonella spp. infection be involved in the pathogenesis of cutaneous melanoma in people with minimal exposure to sunlight?” To initially address this question, blood from eight patients with a previous diagnosis of malignant melanoma were tested for serological or enrichment blood culture/PCR evidence of Bartonella spp. exposure/infection. Subsequently, the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsy specimens from two of these patients were retrievable for molecular testing and attempted visualization of Bartonella spp. in their melanomas. Later, in an attempt to better understand our initial patient-oriented observations, a co-culture model using A375 melanoma cells inoculated with B. henselae was developed. The co-culture model facilitated visual localization of the bacteria and the use of assays to determine if the B. henselae influenced the cytokine expression of the cultured melanoma cells. For various reasons, these microbiological, imaging, and co-culture studies spanned a 7-year period from the time of blood collection and as long as 6 years from the time of initial melanoma diagnosis to initial microbiological testing.

4.2. Patients and Samples

During the month of August 2012, all patients previously diagnosed with melanoma that were being followed by a Dermatology Clinic in Oregon were offered the opportunity to participate in the study. Patients were included regardless of melanoma location, the time since initial diagnosis, and whether there had been reoccurrence or metastasis. Eight individuals agreed to participate in the study. Institutional Review Board approval (North Carolina State University Institutional Review Board (IRB) #1960, Detection of Bartonella Species Infection among a Cohort of Healthy and Sick People) was obtained for the study and each individual provided a signed consent for testing and study participation. Dr. Reicherter submitted blood and serum samples from these eight melanoma patients to the Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Comparative Medicine Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University for Bartonella spp. serology and enrichment blood culture/PCR testing.
Bartonella spp. immunofluorescence antibody assay (IFA) serology (four independent IFA assays) was performed as previously described [39]. Cell culture grown Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii, Bartonella henselae-Houston I and -San Antonio 2 strains and Bartonella koehlerae were used as antigens. Sera were screened at dilutions of 1:16, 1:32, and 1:64 and endpoint titer. Antibody titers of 1:64 or greater were considered seroreactive.
Aseptically obtained whole blood and serum specimens were tested by PCR and following Bartonella alpha-Proteobacteria growth medium (BAPGM) enrichment blood culture, as previously described [40,52]. The BAPGM platform incorporates six separate PCR tests, each representing a different component of the testing process for each patient sample: (1) and (2) PCR amplification of Bartonella spp. following DNA extraction from whole blood and from serum; (3)–(5) PCR following BAPGM enrichment of whole blood culture incubated for 7, 14, and 21 days; and (6) PCR from subculture isolates if obtained after sub inoculation from the BAPGM flask onto plates containing trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood that are incubated for 4 weeks. PCR specimen preparation, DNA extraction, and PCR amplification and analysis were performed in three separate rooms with unidirectional workflow to avoid DNA contamination. In addition, BAPGM cultures were processed in a biosafety cabinet with Hepa filtration in a limited access Biosafety Level III laboratory. PCR-negative controls were prepared using 5 μL of DNA from the blood of a healthy dog, and B. henselae (Houston 1 strain) at a concentration of 1 genome copy/ μL was used as a PCR-positive control during the entire course of this study. In no instance was B. henselae or DNA of any other Bartonella sp. amplified in the negative control lane on any PCR gel. To assess for potential contamination during blood sample processing into BAPGM, a non-inoculated BAPGM culture flask was processed simultaneously and in an identical manner with each batch of patient blood and serum samples tested. For all components of the BAPGM platform (PCR from blood, serum, enrichment cultures at 7, 14, and 21 days, and subcultures), PCR-negative controls remained negative throughout the course of the study. In addition, subcultures of non-inoculated BAPGM medium (culture control) at 7, 14, and 21 days did not yield bacterial growth.

4.3. Conventional PCR (PCR) and Quantitative PCR (qPCR) Analysis

Conventional PCR screening of Bartonella ITS region was performed using oligonucleotides 325s: 5′ CTT CAG ATG ATG ATC CCA AGC CTT CTG GCG 3′ and 1100as: 5′ GAA CCG ACG ACC CCC TGC TTG CAA AGC A 3′ as forward and reverse primers, respectively. Amplification was performed in a 25-µL final volume reaction containing 12.5 µL of MyTaq Premix (Bioline, Memphis, TN, USA, 0.2 µL of 100 µM of each forward and reverse primer (IDT® DNA Technology, Coralville, IA, USA), 7.5 µL of molecular–grade water, and 5 µL of DNA from each sample tested. Conventional PCR was performed in an Eppendorf Mastercycler EP Gradient® under the following conditions: a single hot-start cycle at 95 °C for 2 min followed by 55 cycles of denaturing at 94 °C for 15 s, annealing at 68 °C for 15 s, and extension at 72 °C for 18 s. Amplification is completed by an additional cycle at 72 °C for 1 min, and products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis with detection using ethidium bromide under ultraviolet light. Amplicons products were sequenced to establish species strain identification. Quantitative PCR screening of the Bartonella ITS region was performed using oligonucleotides 325s: 5′ CTTCAGATGATGATCCCAAGCCTTCTGGCG 3′ and 543as: 5′ AATTGGTGGGCCTGGGAGGACTTG 3′ as forward and reverse primers, respectively, and oligonucleotide BsppITS438probe: 5′ FAM-GGTTTTCCGGTTTATCCCGGAGGGC-BHQ1 3′ as TaqMan probe. Amplification is performed in a 25-µL final volume reaction containing 12.5 µL of SsoAdvanced™ Universal Probes Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), 0.2 µL of 100 µM of each forward primer, reverse primer, and TaqMan probe (IDT® DNA Technology, Coralville, IA, USA), 7.5 µL of molecular-grade water, and 5 µL of DNA from each sample tested. Quantitative PCR was performed in an CFX96® (Bio-Rad) under the following conditions: a single hot-start cycle at 95 °C for 3 min followed by 45 cycles of denaturing at 94 °C for 10 s, annealing at 68 °C for 10 s, and extension at 72 °C for 10 s. Amplification was completed by an additional cycle at 72 °C for 30 s. PCR negative controls were prepared using 5 µL of DNA from blood of a healthy dog. Positive controls for PCR were prepared by using 5 µL of DNA from a serial dilution (using dog blood DNA) of B. henselae genomic DNA equivalent to 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 pg/µL. Positive amplification was assessed by analysis of detectable fluorescence vs. cycle values for qPCR. Positive amplicons products from either conventional or qPCR were sent for sequencing to establish species strain identification.

4.4. PCR Analysis of DNA Extracted from Formalin-Fixed Tissue

A 2mm cube of tissue was excised from each paraffin block with a new sterile blade and deparaffinized using two changes of xylene heated for 3 min to 56 °C between changes. Once the tissue was deparaffinized, DNA was extracted following the methods described for the AllPrep RNA and DNA Tissue kit from Qiagen (Valencia, CA, USA). DNA was amplified using a Hemi-Nested PCR protocol for Bartonella spp. The first round of PCR used previously published primers designed to amplify a region conserved in multiple species of Bartonella [53]. These primers amplify sequences in the 16S-23S ribosomal intragenic region (Bspp 325s and 1100as). A second reverse primer was designed to amplify a smaller region in the original amplicon, still using the previously published forward primer (Bspp 325s) and the new reverse primer (5’- GAG GAC TTG AAC CTC CGA CCT CAC G). Each PCR run started with touch down PCR (with half degree step down from 65 °C to 57 °C) followed by 40 cycles at 60 °C and a final extension at 72 °C for five min. GoTaq Green Polymerase (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA) was used for all PCR amplifications. The amplified PCR products were then gel extracted and cloned into T-vector cloning vector pCR2.1 TOPO provided in the TOPO cloning Kit (product number K4560-01, Invitrogen by Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA). Plasmids were subjected to direct sequencing following submission to the University of Minnesota Genomics Center (UMGC). Sequences were compared to reported sequences for Bartonella species using the Blast program.

4.5. Multi-Staining and Confocal Imaging of Tissues and Co-Cultures

Initially, approximately 2 × 2 × 2 mm blocks of lesional skin tissue were excised from the FFPE blocks with a new scalpel blade and the excised block pieces were deparaffinized [33]. The tissue was mounted in optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT) and vertical sections, 80-microns thick, were cut on a cryostat. Sections were floated in glass dishes for incubations with blocking serum, primary and secondary antibodies following previously developed protocols [33,34,54]. Sections were multistained with combinations of the following primary and secondary antibodies and nuclear dyes. Figure 1: nuclear dye DAPI, anti-Bartonella henselae made in mouse at 1:100 (AB704, Abcam Cambridge, MA, USA) plus anti-mouse IgG Alexa 488 made in donkey at 1:400 dilution (Jackson ImmunoResearch), anti-VEGFC made in goat at 1:200 (AB18883 Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), plus anti-goat IgG made in donkey conjugated to Alexa 568 at 1:800 (Jackson ImmunoResearch), and anti-LYVE1 made in rabbit at 1:400 (485214 US Biological, Salem, MA, USA), plus anti-rabbit IgG made in donkey conjugated to Alexa 647 at 1:800. Figure 2 and Figure S1: anti-Bartonella spp. made in chicken at 1:100 dilution (produced by Aves Labs, Inc., Davis, CA, USA), plus anti-chicken IgY conjugated to Alexa 568 at 1:400 dilution (Jackson ImmunoResearch), and nuclear dye TOPRO3 at 1:5000 (T3605, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The anti-Bartonella spp. antibody recognized the gltA citrate synthase region, conserved in all Bartonella spp. The nuclear dye Syto9 at 20 micromolar (L-7007, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) was used in Figure 3. The protocol for titration of the new Bartonella spp. antibody made in chickens is described in the supporting information Figure S1. Cultures were fixed in formalin for 30 min and stained within the plate wells over 2 days. Confocal microscopy was used to image multistained tissues and cells.

4.6. Co-Culture of Melanoma Cells and B. henselae

The melanoma cell line A375 was obtained from the ATCC (# CRL-1619) and maintained in RPMI media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The green fluorescent protein (GFP) expressing plasmid pEGFP-C1 was transfected into A375 melanoma cells and selected using neomycin for a stable GFP expressing clone as previously described [55]. The melanoma cell line, A375, was grown to confluence and then replated at a concentration of 1 × 104 cells/ml, after which the bacteria were directly added to the cell culture media of the A375 cells. The bacteria were added at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells per well. Media from triplicate wells of co-culture was collected at 24, 48, and 72 h post inoculation for cytokine analyses. For imaging, the A375-GFP cells were grown to confluence and then one plate was inoculated with B. henselae (ATCC, # 49882, Houston-1). The cells were fixed after 72 h of growth in the presence of B. henselae with 10% formalin for 30 min and then transferred to PBS. Then formalin fixed cells were immunostained with an antibody targeting Bartonella spp. and nuclear dye TOPRO3 or Syto9 and imaged by confocal microscopy. The cell line A375 was authenticated by IDEXX BioAnalytics (Columbia, MO, USA) using short tandem repeat (STR) analysis in February 2020.

4.7. Cytokine Analysis

Samples of culture media supernatants collected at 24, 48, and 72 h from A375 cells inoculated with or without B. henselae were submitted for testing at the Cytokine Reference Laboratory (CRL, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA). This is a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 licensed facility. Samples were analyzed for VEGF and IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) using the Luminex platform with multiplexing. The magnetic bead set was purchased from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Samples were assayed according to manufacturer’s instructions. Fluorescent color-coded beads coated with a specific capture antibody were added to each sample. After incubation and washing, biotinylated detection antibody was added followed by phycoerythrin-conjugated streptavidin. The beads were read on a Luminex instrument (BioPlex 200, Hercules, CA, USA), which is a dual-laser fluidics-based instrument. One laser determines the analyte being detected via the color coding; the other measures the magnitude of the PE signal from the detection antibody, which is proportional to the amount of analyte bound to the bead. Samples from all testing time points were run in duplicate for each of the assays. Values were interpolated using 5-parameter fitted standard curves.

4.8. Statistical Methods

Student’s t-tests were performed using JMP statistical software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). p-values were corrected to control the experiment-wise error rate using the Dunn-Sidak procedure [56].

4.9. Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutions and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. North Carolina State University (NCSU) Institutional Review Board (IRB 1960) provided ethical approval for this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants included in this study. The Institutional Review Board from North Carolina State University (IRB #1960) approved a research study investigating the detection of Bartonella species infection among a cohort of healthy and sick people. Dr. Reicherter submitted blood and serum samples from eight melanoma patients who signed written informed consent to the Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Comparative Medicine Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/10/3/326/s1, Figure S1: characterization of anti-Bartonella spp. IgY. A new IgY antibody to Bartonella spp. was generated in chickens (Aves Lab, Inc., Davis, CA, USA). Optimal dilutions and the ability of this new IgY antibody to identify two species of Bartonella are presented. Video S1: confirmation of Bartonella henselae invasion of melanoma A375 cells. AVI movie file of this Z-stack.

Author Contributions

Author contributions L.T.B., M.E.E., E.B.B. designed the study and supervised the experimental work in their laboratories. P.R. conceived the initial study and K.J. conducted the literature review. Experiments in this study were performed by C.M., R.G.M. (Ricardo G. Maggi), A.H.M., J.C.M., J.D., J.P. and W.B., G.E.S.J., R.G.M. (Ricardo G. Maggi; Richard G. Melvin) and J.M.B., J.S. analyzed the data and created figures and tables. The final manuscript was read and approved by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board at North Carolina State University, protocol number 1960 and date of approval 28 February 2012.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or supplementary material The data presented in this study are available in [Bartonella henselae Detected in Malignant Melanoma, a Preliminary Study].

Acknowledgments

Thank you to the Cytokine Reference Laboratory (CRL, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and the University Imaging Centers (UIC). Thanks to Guillermo Marques from the UIC with analysis of imaging data.

Conflicts of Interest

E.B.B., in conjunction with Sushama Sontakke and North Carolina State University, holds US Patent No. 7,115,385, Media, and Methods for Cultivation of Microorganisms, which was issued 3 October 2006. E.B.B. is a founder, shareholder, and the chief scientific officer for Galaxy Diagnostics, a company that provides diagnostic testing for the detection of Bartonella species and other vector-borne pathogens in animals and human patients. R.G.M. has led research efforts to optimize the BAPGM platform and is the scientific–technical advisor for Galaxy Diagnostics. J.C.M. is the Head of Research and Development at Galaxy Diagnostics. All other authors declare no conflict of interest. Bartonella testing performed at North Carolina State University by R.M. and E.B.B. was supported by the Bartonella/Vector Borne Diseases Research Fund and the State of North Carolina. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  1. Eggermont, A.M.; Spatz, A.; Robert, C. Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet 2014, 383, 816–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Belbasis, L.; Stefanaki, I.; Stratigos, A.J.; Evangelou, E. Non-genetic risk factors for cutaneous melanoma and keratinocyte skin cancers: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2016, 84, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nejman, D.; Livyatan, I.; Fuks, G.; Gavert, N.; Zwang, Y.; Geller, L.T.; Rotter-Maskowitz, A.; Weiser, R.; Mallel, G.; Gigi, E.; et al. The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type-specific intracellular bacteria. Science 2020, 368, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, H.; Sun, L. When human cells meet bacteria: Precision medicine for cancers using the microbiota. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018, 8, 1157–1175. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rajagopala, S.V.; Vashee, S.; Oldfield, L.M.; Suzuki, Y.; Venter, J.C.; Telenti, A.; Nelson, K.E. The Human Microbiome and Cancer. Cancer Prev. Res. 2017, 10, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. De Martel, C.; Ferlay, J.; Franceschi, S.; Vignat, J.; Bray, F.; Forman, D.; Plummer, M. Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: A review and synthetic analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mager, D.L. Bacteria and cancer: Cause, coincidence or cure? A review. J. Transl. Med. 2006, 4, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Tsai, C.-E.; Chiu, C.-T.; Rayner, C.K.; Wu, K.-L.; Chiu, Y.-C.; Hu, M.-L.; Chuah, S.-K.; Tai, W.-C.; Liang, C.-M.; Wang, H.-M. Associated factors in Streptococcus bovis bacteremia and colorectal cancer. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2016, 32, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Dejea, C.M.; Fathi, P.; Craig, J.M.; Boleij, A.; Taddese, R.; Geis, A.L.; Wu, X.; Shields, C.E.D.; Hechenbleikner, E.M.; Huso, D.L.; et al. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis harbor colonic biofilms containing tumorigenic bacteria. Science 2018, 359, 592–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bullman, S.; Pedamallu, C.S.; Sicinska, E.; Clancy, T.E.; Zhang, X.; Cai, D.; Neuberg, D.; Huang, K.; Guevara, F.; Nelson, T.; et al. Analysis of Fusobacterium persistence and antibiotic response in colorectal cancer. Science 2017, 358, 1443–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Vayssier-Taussat, M.; Albina, E.; Citti, C.; Cosson, J.-F.; Jacques, M.-A.; Lebrun, M.-H.; Le Loir, Y.; Ogliastro, M.; Petit, M.-A.; Roumagnac, P.; et al. Shifting the paradigm from pathogens to pathobiome: New concepts in the light of meta-omics. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2014, 4, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Li, Y.; Tinoco, R.; Elmén, L.; Segota, I.; Xian, Y.; Fujita, Y.; Sahu, A.; Zarecki, R.; Marie, K.; Feng, Y.; et al. Gut microbiota dependent anti-tumor immunity restricts melanoma growth in Rnf5−/− mice. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Jia, B.; Jeon, C.O. Promotion and induction of liver cancer by gut microbiome-mediated modulation of bile acids. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gopalakrishnan, V.; Spencer, C.N.; Nezi, L.; Reuben, A.; Andrews, M.C.; Karpinets, T.V.; Prieto, P.A.; Vicente, D.; Hoffman, K.; Wei, S.C.; et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti—PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science 2018, 359, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Matson, V.; Fessler, J.; Bao, R.; Chongsuwat, T.; Zha, Y.; Alegre, M.-L.; Luke, J.J.; Gajewski, T.F. The commensal microbiome is associated with anti—PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Science 2018, 359, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Salava, A.; Aho, V.; Pereira, P.; Koskinen, K.; Paulin, L.; Auvinen, P.; Lauerma, A. Skin microbiome in melanomas and melanocytic nevi. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2016, 26, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mrázek, J.; Mekadim, C.; Kučerová, P.; Švejstil, R.; Salmonová, H.; Vlasáková, J.; Tarasová, R.; Čížková, J.; Červinková, M. Melanoma-related changes in skin microbiome. Folia Microbiol. 2018, 64, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lax, A.J.; Thomas, W. How bacteria could cause cancer: One step at a time. Trends Microbiol. 2002, 10, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cheslock, M.A.; Embers, M.E. Human Bartonellosis: An Underappreciated Public Health Problem? Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2019, 4, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Regier, Y.; O’Rourkef, F.; Kempf, V.A.J. Bartonella spp.—A chance to establish one Health concepts in veterinary and human medicine. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Álvarez-Fernández, A.; Breitschwerdt, E.B.; Solano-Gallego, L. Bartonella infections in cats and dogs including zoonotic aspects. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chomel, B.; Kasten, R. Bartonellosis, an increasingly recognized zoonosis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 109, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chomel, B.B.; Boulouis, H.-J.; Maruyama, S.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Bartonella Spp. in Pets and Effect on Human Health. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gomes, C.; Ruiz, J. Carrion’s Disease: The Sound of Silence. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Schwensen, J.F.; Nielsen, R.H.; Helleberg, M. Bacillary angiomatosis in a solid organ transplant recipient. IDCases 2019, 18, e00649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Breitschwerdt, E.B.; Maggi, R.G. Bartonella quintana and Bartonella vinsonii subsp. vinsonii bloodstream co-infection in a girl from North Carolina, USA. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2019, 208, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pitassi, L.H.U.; Diniz, P.P.V.D.P.; Scorpio, D.G.; Drummond, M.R.; Lania, B.G.; Barjas-Castro, M.L.; Gilioli, R.; Colombo, S.; Sowy, S.; Breitschwerdt, E.B.; et al. Bartonella spp. Bacteremia in Blood Donors from Campinas, Brazil. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Lantos, P.M.; Maggi, R.G.; Ferguson, B.; Varkey, J.; Park, L.P.; Breitschwerdt, E.B.; Woods, C.W. Detection of Bartonella Species in the Blood of Veterinarians and Veterinary Technicians: A Newly Recognized Occupational Hazard? Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014, 14, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Breitschwerdt, E.; Linder, K.; Day, M.; Maggi, R.; Chomel, B.; Kempf, V. Koch’s Postulates and the Pathogenesis of Comparative Infectious Disease Causation Associated with Bartonella species. J. Comp. Pathol. 2013, 148, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Breitschwerdt, E.B.; Bradley, J.M.; Maggi, R.G.; Lashnits, E.; Reicherter, P. Bartonella Associated Cutaneous Lesions (BACL) in People with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms. Pathogens 2020, 9, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rossi, M.A.; Balakrishnan, N.; Linder, K.E.; Messa, J.B.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Concurrent Bartonella henselae infection in a dog with panniculitis and owner with ulcerated nodular skin lesions. Vet. Dermatol. 2014, 26, 60-e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wong, A.K.; Alfert, M.; Castrillon, D.H.; Shen, Q.; Holash, J.; Yancopoulos, G.D.; Chin, L. Excessive tumor-elaborated VEGF and its neutralization define a lethal paraneoplastic syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 7481–7486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Balakrishnan, N.; Ericson, M.; Maggi, R.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Vasculitis, cerebral infarction and persistent Bartonella henselae infection in a child. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Wacnik, P.W.; Baker, C.M.; Herron, M.J.; Kren, B.T.; Blazar, B.R.; Wilcox, G.L.; Hordinsky, M.K.; Beitz, A.J.; Ericson, M.E. Tumor-induced mechanical hyperalgesia involves CGRP receptors and altered innervation and vascularization of DsRed2 fluorescent hindpaw tumors. Pain 2005, 115, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kempf, V.A.J.; Volkmann, B.; Schaller, M.; Sander, C.A.; Alitalo, K.; Rieß, T.; Autenrieth, I.B. Evidence of a leading role for VEGF in Bartonella henselae-induced endothelial cell proliferations. Cell. Microbiol. 2001, 3, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Seubert, A.; Schulein, R.; Dehio, C. Bacterial persistence within erythrocytes: A unique pathogenic strategy of Bartonella spp. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2001, 291, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Meghari, S.; Rolain, J.; Grau, G.E.; Platt, E.; Barrassi, L.; Mège, J.; Raoult, D. Antiangiogenic Effect of Erythromycin: An In Vitro Model of Bartonella quintana Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2006, 193, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Pulliainen, A.T.; Dehio, C. Persistence of Bartonella spp. stealth pathogens: From subclinical infections to vasoproliferative tumor formation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 563–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Jost, M.; Latz, A.; Ballhorn, W.; Kempf, V.A.J. Development of a Specific and Sensitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay as an In Vitro Diagnostic Tool for Detection of Bartonella henselae Antibodies in Human Serum. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Oteo, J.A.; Maggi, R.; Portillo, A.; Bradley, J.; García-Álvarez, L.; San-Martín, M.; Roura, X.; Breitschwerdt, E. Prevalence of Bartonella spp. by culture, PCR and serology, in veterinary personnel from Spain. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Webster, J.D.; Miller, M.A.; Dusold, D.; Ramos-Vara, J. Effects of Prolonged Formalin Fixation on the Immunohistochemical Detection of Infectious Agents in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues. Vet. Pathol. 2010, 47, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Hong, J.; Li, Y.; Hua, X.; Bai, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhu, C.; Du, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yuan, C. Inhibition of phagocytosis and pyroptosis of macrophages promotes Bartonella invasion into the blood stream through lymphatic circulation. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 215, jiw526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wei, Y.; Mahoud, S.; Bakheet, A.M.H.; Wang, L.; Zhou, S.; Tang, J. Pathway-related molecules of VEGFC/D-VEGFR3/NRP2 axis in tumor lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis. Clin. Chim. Acta 2016, 461, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dehio, C. Recent progress in understanding Bartonella-induced vascular proliferation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2003, 6, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Truttmann, M.C.; Rhomberg, T.A.; Dehio, C. Combined action of the type IV secretion effector proteins BepC and BepF promotes invasome formation of Bartonella henselae on endothelial and epithelial cells. Cell. Microbiol. 2010, 13, 284–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Felcht, M.; Thomas, M. Angiogenesis in malignant melanoma. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2015, 13, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Dehio, C.; Meyer, M.; Berger, J.; Schwarz, H.; Lanz, C. Interaction of Bartonella henselae with endothelial cells results in bacterial aggregation on the cell surface and the subsequent engulfment and internalisation of the bacterial aggregate by a unique structure, the invasome. J. Cell Sci. 1997, 110, 2141–2154. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. O’Rourke, F.; Mändle, T.; Urbich, C.; Dimmeler, S.; Michaelis, U.R.; Brandes, R.P.; Flötenmeyer, M.; Döring, C.; Hansmann, M.-L.; Lauber, K.; et al. Reprogramming of myeloid angiogenic cells by B artonella henselae leads to microenvironmental regulation of pathological angiogenesis. Cell. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 1447–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kirby, J.E.; Nekorchuk, D.M. Bartonella-associated endothelial proliferation depends on inhibition of apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 4656–4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Zhu, C.; Bai, Y.; Liu, Q.; Li, D.; Hong, J.; Yang, Z.; Cui, L.; Hua, X.; Yuan, C. Depolymerization of Cytokeratin Intermediate Filaments Facilitates Intracellular Infection of HeLa Cells by Bartonella henselae. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 207, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Mccord, A.M.; Resto-Ruiz, S.I.; Anderson, B.E. Autocrine Role for Interleukin-8 in Bartonella henselae-induced Angiogenesis. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 5185–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Chomel, B.B.; Kasten, R.W.; Sykes, J.E.; Boulouis, H.-J.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Clinical Impact of Persistent Bartonella Bacteremia in Humans and Animals. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003, 990, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Varanat, M.; Maggi, R.; Linder, K.; Breitschwerdt, E. Molecular Prevalence of Bartonella, Babesia and Hemotropic Mycoplasma sp. in Dogs with Splenic Disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2011, 25, 1284–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Maluki, A.; Breitschwerdt, E.; Bemis, L.; Greenberg, R.; Mozayeni, B.R.; Dencklau, J.; Ericson, M. Imaging analysis of Bartonella species in the skin using single-photon and multi-photon (second harmonic generation) laser scanning microscopy. Clin. Case Rep. 2020, 8, 1564–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xiong, Y.; Li, Z.; Ji, M.; Tan, A.-C.; Bemis, J.; Tse, J.-V.; Huang, G.; Park, J.; Ji, C.; Chen, J.; et al. MIR29B regulates expression of MLLT11 (AF1Q), an MLL fusion partner, and low MIR29B expression associates with adverse cytogenetics and poor overall survival in AML. Br. J. Haematol. 2011, 153, 753–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sokal, R.R.; Rohlf, F.J. Biometry, 4th ed.; W.H. Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
Pathogens 10 00326 g001 550
Figure 1. Bartonella henselae was detected in a melanoma biopsy, multi-stained with antibodies to Bartonella henselae, vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC), lymphatic vessel biomarker (LYVE1), and DAPI nuclear dye. A thick tissue section, 80 microns, was multi-stained with (a) nuclear stain DAPI (white), (b) B. henselae antibodies (green), (c) VEGFC antibodies (red), and (d) lymphatic vessel biomarker LYVE1 antibodies (magenta) and imaged with laser scanning confocal microscopy. Merged channels, (panels (e–g)) reveal that immunoreactive-B. henselae (green in (b,e–g)) co-localizes with the nuclear dye DAPI (white in a,e), colocalizes with immunoreactive VEGFC (red in (c,f)) and appears to be inside the lymphatic vessels (magenta in (d,g)). Sequential tissue sections that received no B. henselae antibodies show no contribution to the fluorescence signal (data not shown). The 40X UPLFLN NA:1.3, 33 microns total Z-stack thickness, 61 steps, 0.55 micron steps. Scale bar = 50 microns.
Figure 1. Bartonella henselae was detected in a melanoma biopsy, multi-stained with antibodies to Bartonella henselae, vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC), lymphatic vessel biomarker (LYVE1), and DAPI nuclear dye. A thick tissue section, 80 microns, was multi-stained with (a) nuclear stain DAPI (white), (b) B. henselae antibodies (green), (c) VEGFC antibodies (red), and (d) lymphatic vessel biomarker LYVE1 antibodies (magenta) and imaged with laser scanning confocal microscopy. Merged channels, (panels (e–g)) reveal that immunoreactive-B. henselae (green in (b,e–g)) co-localizes with the nuclear dye DAPI (white in a,e), colocalizes with immunoreactive VEGFC (red in (c,f)) and appears to be inside the lymphatic vessels (magenta in (d,g)). Sequential tissue sections that received no B. henselae antibodies show no contribution to the fluorescence signal (data not shown). The 40X UPLFLN NA:1.3, 33 microns total Z-stack thickness, 61 steps, 0.55 micron steps. Scale bar = 50 microns.
Pathogens 10 00326 g001
Pathogens 10 00326 g002 550
Figure 2. Melanoma A375 cells co-cultured with B. henselae. (a) Melanoma A375 cells were cultured without and (b) with B. henselae organisms (green). After 24 h, cultured cells were fixed and immunostained with anti-Bartonella spp. (green). The length of dendritic processes of the Melanoma A375 cells were shorter when cultured with B. henselae (t2 = 4.18, p < 0.001 (n = 10). (c) At 24 h, immuno-reactive B. henselae (green) appeared to be within as well as outside of melanoma A375 cells. Z-projection of merged Bartonella spp.-immunoreactivity (green), DNA stain TOPRO3 (red), and differential interference contrast (DIC) imaging. Single optical sections were captured with confocal microscopy at 10× UPLSAPO NA: 0.40. Scale bar = 50 microns.
Figure 2. Melanoma A375 cells co-cultured with B. henselae. (a) Melanoma A375 cells were cultured without and (b) with B. henselae organisms (green). After 24 h, cultured cells were fixed and immunostained with anti-Bartonella spp. (green). The length of dendritic processes of the Melanoma A375 cells were shorter when cultured with B. henselae (t2 = 4.18, p < 0.001 (n = 10). (c) At 24 h, immuno-reactive B. henselae (green) appeared to be within as well as outside of melanoma A375 cells. Z-projection of merged Bartonella spp.-immunoreactivity (green), DNA stain TOPRO3 (red), and differential interference contrast (DIC) imaging. Single optical sections were captured with confocal microscopy at 10× UPLSAPO NA: 0.40. Scale bar = 50 microns.
Pathogens 10 00326 g002
Pathogens 10 00326 g003 550
Figure 3. A video documenting the intracellular location of B. henselae in melanoma cells. Melanoma A375 cells were cultured with B. henselae organisms and at 24 h co-cultures were stained with the nuclear dye Syto9. Z-projection total thickness is 19.3-microns, constructed from 64 optical sections each 0.3 microns thick (Nikon Ti-E Motorized Microscope. Plan Fluor 100× Oil DIC H, Nikon. Scale bar = 5 microns). Data were deconvoluted using Imaris microscopy software with a 5-micron size filter was applied to detect bacteria and only bacteria within the melanoma cells are shown. AVI movie file of this Z-stack is shown in the Video S1 movie file.
Figure 3. A video documenting the intracellular location of B. henselae in melanoma cells. Melanoma A375 cells were cultured with B. henselae organisms and at 24 h co-cultures were stained with the nuclear dye Syto9. Z-projection total thickness is 19.3-microns, constructed from 64 optical sections each 0.3 microns thick (Nikon Ti-E Motorized Microscope. Plan Fluor 100× Oil DIC H, Nikon. Scale bar = 5 microns). Data were deconvoluted using Imaris microscopy software with a 5-micron size filter was applied to detect bacteria and only bacteria within the melanoma cells are shown. AVI movie file of this Z-stack is shown in the Video S1 movie file.
Pathogens 10 00326 g003
Pathogens 10 00326 g004 550
Figure 4. Bartonella henselae triggers cytokine release during co-culture with melanoma cells. (a) An ELISA documented a significant increase in VEGFC expression at 24 h** after inoculation of melanoma cells with B. henselae (Student’s t-test: t2 = 7, p < 0.01, n = 6). Significance was determined by Student’s t-test. (b) VEGFC expression was greater in co-cultures and the increase in VEGFC-expression occurred earlier, namely 24 h, when B. henselae was present as compared to melanoma cells alone. The rate of VEGFC expression when B. henselae was present was significantly greater than that for melanoma cells alone at 24 h (t4 = 7, p < 0.05), but did not differ from that of melanoma alone after 48 (t4 = 0.71, p = 0.54) and 72 h (t4 = 0.25, p = 0.82). n = 6. (c) After inoculation of A375 melanoma cells with B. henselae, media was collected and analyzed for interleukin 8 (IL-8) expression at 24, 48, and 72 h. IL-8 expression was significantly increased in response to the presence of Bartonella at 24 and 48 h time points ** (Student’s t-tests: t4 = 27.08, p < 0.001, and t4 = 14.84, p < 0.001 for 24 and 48 h, respectively). IL-8 expression was higher in the presence of Bartonella at 72 h, but the difference was not significant (t4 = 1.72, p = 0.16). n = 6.
Figure 4. Bartonella henselae triggers cytokine release during co-culture with melanoma cells. (a) An ELISA documented a significant increase in VEGFC expression at 24 h** after inoculation of melanoma cells with B. henselae (Student’s t-test: t2 = 7, p < 0.01, n = 6). Significance was determined by Student’s t-test. (b) VEGFC expression was greater in co-cultures and the increase in VEGFC-expression occurred earlier, namely 24 h, when B. henselae was present as compared to melanoma cells alone. The rate of VEGFC expression when B. henselae was present was significantly greater than that for melanoma cells alone at 24 h (t4 = 7, p < 0.05), but did not differ from that of melanoma alone after 48 (t4 = 0.71, p = 0.54) and 72 h (t4 = 0.25, p = 0.82). n = 6. (c) After inoculation of A375 melanoma cells with B. henselae, media was collected and analyzed for interleukin 8 (IL-8) expression at 24, 48, and 72 h. IL-8 expression was significantly increased in response to the presence of Bartonella at 24 and 48 h time points ** (Student’s t-tests: t4 = 27.08, p < 0.001, and t4 = 14.84, p < 0.001 for 24 and 48 h, respectively). IL-8 expression was higher in the presence of Bartonella at 72 h, but the difference was not significant (t4 = 1.72, p = 0.16). n = 6.
Pathogens 10 00326 g004
Table
Table 1. Demographic data for eight melanoma patients from Oregon.
Table 1. Demographic data for eight melanoma patients from Oregon.
Patient No:Age (Years)GenderOccupationOregon Residency (Years)Year of Melanoma DiagnosisPatient Reported Co-Morbidities *
181FHousewife6429 December 2011
Malignant melanoma
(superficial spreading type)		Breast cancer, dementia, cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, arteriosclerosis
277MDentist772008
Metastatic		Hairy cell leukemia, lung cancer, depression, diabetes, hypertension, hypothyroid, chronic pain
371MTruck driver/boiler operator7123 August 2006
Malignant melanoma
(superficial spreading type)		Depression, diabetes, 2 heart attacks, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia
468MPainter/truckdriver5Primary 2008 **
Metastatic 2009
Malignant melanoma (invasive)		Thrombosis, heart bypass, heart attack, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia
571MPhysician3917 March 2010
Malignant melanoma
(in situ lentigo malignant type)		Carpel tunnel syndrome, acromioplasty, basal cell/squamous cell, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia
685FNurse80Primary 15 August 2006
Malignant melanoma (nodular)
Recurrence 2011 and 2012		Breast Cancer, depression, hysterectomy, diabetes, replaced heart valve (bovine), hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, cholelithiasis
731MCook14First lesion 2 January 2008
Malignant melanoma (invasive)
Second lesion 16 February 2012 **
Malignant melanoma (invasive)
Third lesion 7 February 2018
Malignant melanoma
(superficial spreading type)		Appendectomy
877MTimber worker42Primary 17 December 2007
Malignant melanoma
(superficial spreading type)
Second lesion 3 January 2008
Malignant melanoma		Diabetes, Hypertension, Hypercholesterolemia, Asthma
* Co-morbidities were self-reported on the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved questionnaire completed by each participant. ** Tissue blocks were obtained from these dates.
Table
Table 2. Bartonella spp. serology and Bartonella alpha proteobacteria enrichment blood culture PCR results for eight melanoma patients from Oregon.
Table 2. Bartonella spp. serology and Bartonella alpha proteobacteria enrichment blood culture PCR results for eight melanoma patients from Oregon.
Reciprocal IFA Antibody Titers To:
Patient No:Bartonella vinsonii berkhoffiiBartonella henselae Houston 1Bartonella henselae San Antonio 2Bartonella koehleraeBartonella Alphaproteobacteria Growth Medium (BAPGM) Enrichment Blood Culture/PCR *
164<1664<16Negative
264<16128<16B. henselae (qPCR)
3128<1632<16Negative
4<16<16<16<16B. henselae (cPCR)
5<16<16<16<16Negative
6<16<1664<16Negative
7<16<16<16<16B. henselae (cPCR)
864166464Negative
* Bartonella species confirmed by DNA sequence analyses were at least 99% similar to B. henselae.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ericson, M.E.; Breitschwerdt, E.B.; Reicherter, P.; Maxwell, C.; Maggi, R.G.; Melvin, R.G.; Maluki, A.H.; Bradley, J.M.; Miller, J.C.; Simmons, G.E., Jr.; et al. Bartonella henselae Detected in Malignant Melanoma, a Preliminary Study. Pathogens 2021, 10, 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030326

AMA Style

Ericson ME, Breitschwerdt EB, Reicherter P, Maxwell C, Maggi RG, Melvin RG, Maluki AH, Bradley JM, Miller JC, Simmons GE Jr., et al. Bartonella henselae Detected in Malignant Melanoma, a Preliminary Study. Pathogens. 2021; 10(3):326. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030326

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ericson, Marna E., Edward B. Breitschwerdt, Paul Reicherter, Cole Maxwell, Ricardo G. Maggi, Richard G. Melvin, Azar H. Maluki, Julie M. Bradley, Jennifer C. Miller, Glenn E. Simmons, Jr., and et al. 2021. "Bartonella henselae Detected in Malignant Melanoma, a Preliminary Study" Pathogens 10, no. 3: 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030326

APA Style

Ericson, M. E., Breitschwerdt, E. B., Reicherter, P., Maxwell, C., Maggi, R. G., Melvin, R. G., Maluki, A. H., Bradley, J. M., Miller, J. C., Simmons, G. E., Jr., Dencklau, J., Joppru, K., Peterson, J., Bae, W., Scanlon, J., & Bemis, L. T. (2021). Bartonella henselae Detected in Malignant Melanoma, a Preliminary Study. Pathogens, 10(3), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030326

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop