Next Article in Journal
Invasiveness of Escherichia coli Is Associated with an IncFII Plasmid
Next Article in Special Issue
Current Understanding of the Pathogenesis of Porcine Circovirus 3
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Detection of Zoonotic and Non-Zoonotic Pathogens from Wild Boars and Their Ticks in the Corsican Wetlands
Previous Article in Special Issue
Porcine Circovirus (PCV) Genotype 2d-Based Virus-like Particles (VLPs) Induced Broad Cross-Neutralizing Antibodies against Diverse Genotypes and Provided Protection in Dual-Challenge Infection of a PCV2d Virus and a Type 1 Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/pathogens10121644
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Minimal Dosage of Porcine Circovirus Type 2d Based Virus-like Particles to Induce Stable Protective Immunity against Infection

by
Jong-Hyuk Baek
1,†,
Sang-Ho Cha
2,†,
Sun-Hee Cho
1,
Myung-Shin Lee
3 and
Changhoon Park
3,*
1
Department of Animal Vaccine Development, BioPOA, Dongtangiheung-ro, Hwaseong-si 18469, Korea
2
PRRS Research Laboratory, Viral Diseases Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Korea
3
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Eulji University School of Medicine, Yongdu-dong, Junggu, Daejeon 34824, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
They were contributed equally.
Pathogens 2021, 10(12), 1644; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121644
Submission received: 19 November 2021 / Revised: 13 December 2021 / Accepted: 16 December 2021 / Published: 20 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Advanced Research on Porcine Circovirus)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In recent years, porcine circovirus type 2d (PCV2d) has achieved a dominant position worldwide. Various PCV2d capsid-based vaccines have been used to alleviate concerns regarding the emergence of the variant. This study aimed to determine the dosage of recombinant PCV2d capsid protein to induce protective efficacy against experimental challenge with a virulent PCV2d strain. Conventional 3-week-old pigs were intramuscularly inoculated with different doses of the protein (60, 20, 10 and 2 µg). Four weeks after vaccination, all pigs were challenged with pathogenic PCV2d (SNU140003), which was isolated from a farm severely experiencing PCV2-associated disease in Korea. Vaccination with greater than 10 µg of the capsid protein caused a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in PCV2d viremia, lymphoid lesions and lymphoid PCV2 antigen levels in vaccinated challenged pigs compared to unvaccinated challenged pigs. The vaccination also resulted in significantly higher (p < 0.05) titers of neutralizing antibodies against PCV2d. However, the pigs vaccinated with 2 µg had significantly lower neutralizing antibody titers than the other vaccinated groups. They showed a similar level of challenged PCV2d in serum and lymphoid lesion score compared to unvaccinated challenged pigs. The difference in efficacy among the vaccinated groups indicates that there may be a baseline dosage to induce sufficient neutralizing antibodies to prevent viral replication in pigs. In conclusion, at least 10 µg dosage of capsid protein is essential for stable protective efficacy against PCV2d in a pig model.

1. Introduction

Porcine circovirus type 2 virus (PCV2)-associated disease (PCVAD) is one of the most severe threats to the swine industry. In growing pigs, the symptoms can be summarized with a variety of clinical manifestations, including excessive weight loss, respiratory illness and increased mortality [1,2]. Post-weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome and porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome have also been associated with PCVAD [3,4,5]. Based on numerous etiological and pathological evidence, PCV2 has been an obligatory agent for PCVAD, but several other infectious and noninfectious factors have also been reported to contribute to the manifestation of the symptoms through various mechanisms [6].
PCV2 has a high mutation rate comparable to that of RNA viruses [7,8], which may further promote the rapid evolution and emergence of unique PCV2 genotypes. Since the initial commercial vaccine was released, the evolutionary history of this virus has clearly reflected this fact. PCV2a was the predominant genotype among the PCV2 variants when the initial vaccine was being developed [9,10]. However, after the first commercial PCV2a-based vaccine was launched in 2007, PCV2b supplanted PCV2a as the predominant genotype worldwide to avoid vaccine immunity [11,12,13]. Recently, another genotypic shift has occurred with PCV2d becoming the predominant strain in the global pig population, replacing PCV2a and PCV2b [14]. In terms of an outbreak of PCVAD caused by PCV2d in PCV2a-vaccinated herds, this second shift has raised questions about the efficacy of the PCV2a vaccine against the PCV2d genotype [15,16].
Most PCV2 vaccines belong to two categories: subunit or inactivated virus vaccines [17]. The two vaccine types have virus-like particles (VLPs) in common as major antigens, which consist of the viral capsid. VLP is sufficiently effective to induce antibodies to neutralize several genotypes of PCV2. Current commercial VLP vaccines have been shown to protect post-weaning and growing pigs against experimental challenge with not only PCV2a but also other genotype strains (PCV2b and PCV2d) [15,18]. Despite continuous doubt, PCV2a VLPs seem to provide sufficient immunity to pigs under experimental conditions [19,20].
Generally, the efficacy of VLP vaccines depends on the adjuvant, purification and amount of the antigen [21,22,23]. In particular, antibody titers tend to correlate with the inoculated antigen dosage [23]. Neutralizing antibodies at high titers have important functions in the defense of the body against viral spreading by inhibiting attachment and infection of new cells [24]. As far as PCV2 vaccines are concerned, neutralizing antibodies can be the only factor to prevent clinical symptoms of PCV2. The absence of PCV2-neutralizing antibodies was correlated with high PCV2 replication and PCV2-associated disease [25]. Therefore, VLP dosage may be the main determinant of PCV2 vaccine efficacy. However, there is no report about the minimal dosage of VLP that is sufficiently potent to induce neutralizing antibodies as PCV2 vaccine antigen. Here, we suggested a novel basal line of VLP dosage based on two animal experiments using guinea pigs and conventional pigs. The guinea pig experiment was performed to confirm the presence or absence of antibodies produced by the VLPs themselves rather than quantitative estimation of induced antibodies, whereas the pig experiment indicated the practical minimal VLP dosage to protect conventional pigs against experimental challenge of PCV2d field isolate, which will be a useful reference for future vaccine development. Additionally, comparison of antibodies in guinea pig and pig models may provide a better understanding of pig immunity.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. PCV2d Capsid Expression and VLP Confirmation

Capsid protein of PCV2d was expressed from baculovirus infected Sf9 insect cells, as previously described [26]. Briefly, the PCV2d ORF2 gene (GenBank no. KM924369) was cloned into the pFastBac expression vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and transfected into Sf9 cells. The culture supernatant containing the recombinant baculovirus was harvested and used to infect a separate batch of Sf9 cells. After 3 days, VLPs were purified from culture supernatant by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation as previously described [26].
The VLP structure was confirmed by using a specific antibody to detect the decoy epitope (169–180 aa) on the inside of the particle, which may induce non-neutralizing antibodies wasting immunologic capacity [26]. For the process, the wells of a 96-well microtiter plate were coated with BSA-conjugated synthetic the decoy epitope 169–180 peptides, N terminal deleted capsid protein, or the purified VLP in coating buffer (0.1 M NaHCO3, pH 8.6) and then blocked with 3% (w/v) BSA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After incubation with 1 mg/mL of the anti-CP169-180 antibody, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)- conjugated goat anti-human Ck antibodies (Chemicon-Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) were added to each well. After washing with 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 in PBS (PBST), 3,30,5,50-tetramethyl benzidine (TMB) (GenDEPOT, Barker, TX, USA) substrate solution was added and the absorbance was measured at 650 nm with a Multiskan Ascent microplate reader (LabSystems, Helsinki, Finland) [26].

2.2. The Vaccine Formulation with Carbopol Adjuvant

Carbopol® 974P Polymer (Lubrizol, Cleveland, OH, USA) 400 mg was dissolved in 180 mL distilled water, then sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 20 min and stored at 4 °C until further use. Before use, the Carbopol solutions were neutralized to pH 7.3 with 5N NaOH. The polymer and 20 mL of the purified capsid protein were mixed on a magnetic plate stirred at 150 rpm for 1 h. Finally, a 1 mL dose containing VLP of PCV2d (2 μg, 10 μg, 20 μg, or 60 μg) and 2 mg of Carbopol adjuvant was prepared and stored at 4 °C before use.

2.3. Animal Studies

Two separated animal experiments were designed for the study (Table 1).
(1)
Pig challenge experiment: 4 weeks old, colostrum-fed, cross-bred, conventional piglets were purchased from a PCV2 seronegative farm. A total 30 piglets were tested for anti PCV2 antibodies and the only seronegative individuals were selected. They were confirmed as non-viremic for PCV2 by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The blood samples collected from the piglets were also examined for PRRSV infection using real-time PCR (Forward primer: 5’-GAAGAGAAACCCGGAGAAGC-3’; Reverse primer: 5’-GAAGAGAAACCCGGAGAAGC-3’) and PRRSV-specific antibodies were detected using ELISA (HerdCheck PRRS 3XR™, IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook, Maine, USA). All piglets were confirmed as PRRSV-free.
For the experiment, group were designed to be randomized, blinded and controlled. Twenty-four pigs were randomly divided into six groups (4 pigs per group). The Carbopol adjuvanted vaccines in combination with VLP 2 μg (group 1), VLP 10 μg (group 2), VLP 20 μg (group 3) and VLP 60 μg (group 4) was inoculated intramuscularly as 1.0 mL dose at 5 weeks of age in the right side of the neck. After 3 weeks of vaccination, the vaccinated pigs (groups 1, 2, 3 and 4) and non-vaccinated challenged pigs (group 5) were inoculated intranasally with 3 mL of a virulent PCV2d strain (SNUVR140004, Genebank No. KJ437506.1) at 1.0 × 104 tissue culture infective dose of 50% [TCID50/mL]. The challenging virus was isolated from lymph node of a pigs which had been vaccinated with a commercial PCV2a vaccine and showed PCVAD in Korea. The negative control group (group 6) was remained unvaccinated and unchallenged throughout the experiment.
The pigs in each group were managed separately within the facility. Clinical examination and weighing were performed daily. Blood samples and nasal swabs were collected weekly. All pigs were euthanized for necropsy 35 days after vaccination (at 14 days of challenge) and superficial inguinal lymph nodes were collected for histopathology and immunohistochemistry.
(2)
Guinea pig inoculation experiment: A total 20 Specific-pathogen-free 250 to 300 g outbred male Hartley strain guinea pigs were purchased from Charles River Breeding Laboratories. They were inoculated intramuscularly in the hind legs. The same formulated vaccines with the pig inoculation were administered as half dose (0.5 mL) with VLP 1 μg (group 1), VLP 5 μg (group 2), VLP 10 μg (group 3) and VLP 30 μg (group 4). Boosting vaccination was performed with the same administration 14 days after priming vaccination. Blood samples were collected 14 days after second vaccination.
All of the methods in these two experiments were approved by the BioPOA Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

2.4. Serum Antibody Test

Total antibodies against PCV2d from guinea pig serum were quantified with an indirect fluorescence assay (IFA) using the sera and PCV2-infected PK-15 cells, as previously described [27]. Anti-PCV2 IgG antibodies of pig serum were tested by a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (SK105, BioChek, Reeuwijk, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The serum virus neutralization (SVN) test was also performed as previously described [28] on 0, 21 and 35 days after vaccination. The challenge virus (SNUVR140004) was used for the assay. Neutralizing antibodies titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest serum dilution that completely blocked the infection in the PK15 cells compared with the virus control.

2.5. Clinical, Virological and Pathological Evaluation

The pigs were clinically monitored and scored based on their physical conditions ranging from 0 (normal) to 6 (severe) [29]. The body condition included respiratory (cough, dyspnea) and digestive (diarrhea) symptoms. Meanwhile, rectal temperatures were measured daily at the same time for 35 days after vaccination.
Challenged virus gene was detected from serum samples using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Crawley, UK) and quantified as PCV2 genomic DNA copy numbers by real-time PCR [30].
The morphometric analysis of histopathological lesion was blindly evaluated as previously described [31]. Superficial inguinal lymph nodes were collected during necropsy for histopathological evaluation. Three blocks of tissues were collected from the lymph nodes of each pig and serially sectioned and prepared. Three slides were obtained from each block to allow scoring of the pathologic lesions using the NIH Image J 1.43 m program (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij (accessed on 9 November 2021)). For each slide, 10 fields were randomly selected and evaluated as follows: 0 (no lymphoid depletion or granulomatous replacement), 1 (mild lymphoid depletion), 2 (moderate lymphoid depletion), 3 (severe lymphoid depletion and granulomatous replacement). The PCV2 antigens were also detected by immunohistochemistry using a rabbit polyclonal anti-PCV2 antibody (1:200 in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20) in the same tissue sections [32].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism (v5.0; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Results are expressed as means and standard deviations of the indicated number of independent measurements. Statistical significance was determined using two-tailed unpaired Student’s t tests and non-parametric Mann–Whitney’s u test. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used to analyze the relationship among the groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. VLP Was Purified and Quantified

The capsid protein was clearly expressed from the insect cells which had been transfected with bacmid containing PCV2d cap gene. SDS-PAGE showed 23 kDa size single band and western blot confirmed it as capsid protein by using a monoclonal PCV2 capsid specific antibody [26]. The protein was quantified by the Bradford assay which is based on the reaction of coomassie brilliant blue with basic amino acid residues of the protein. Serially diluted VLP solutions were prepared and adjuvanted with the Carbopol.
VLP structure fitness was evaluated with the decoy epitope (169–180 aa) specific antibody. The ELISA result demonstrated absence of the exposed internal decoy epitope in the VLP solution, showing similar level with negative control and significantly lower level than the synthetic the decoy epitope peptides and N terminal deleted capsid protein coating wells. The result indicated structural fitness of the produced VLP.

3.2. The Total Antibodies Showed Significant Difference among the Inoculated Guinea Pig Groups

All blood samples of guinea pigs were collected 2 weeks after boosting. IFA result showed that the guinea pigs (Group 1) inoculated with 1 μg VLP had significantly (p < 0.05) lower titer of anti PCV antibodies than the other vaccinated guinea pigs (Group 2, 3 and 4) (Figure 1). However, it was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than titer of the negative control (Group 5). Guinea pigs (Group 2, 3 and 4) inoculated with greater than 5 μg VLP did not showed statistical difference for average antibody level. The negative control (Group 5) did not have any antibody throughout the experiment.

3.3. The Antibody Level of Vaccinated Pigs Was Significantly Higher Than That of Unvaccinated Controls

Anti-PCV2 antibody results from the pig challenge experiment are summarized in (Figure 2). The vaccinated pigs started to seroconvert from 7 days after vaccination, whereas the non-vaccinated pigs (Group 5 and 6) remained seronegative until the challenge. The pigs (Group 2, 3 and 4) inoculated with greater than 10 μg VLP had significantly (p < 0.05) higher level of anti-PCV2 antibodies on 14 days after vaccination than the pigs (Group 1) inoculated with 2 μg VLP. At challenge, the pigs (Group 3 and 4) inoculated with greater than 20 μg VLP showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher antibody level compared to the pigs (Group 1) inoculated with 2 μg VLP. However, there was no significant difference in antibody level among the vaccinated groups on 7 days and 14 days after challenge. Unvaccinated control pigs (Group 5 and 6) showed significantly lower antibody level than the vaccinated pigs after the challenge.

3.4. The Neutralizing Antibodies Were Stably Detected in the Groups Inoculated with More Than 10 μg VLP

The neutralizing antibodies against the challenge PCV2d strain were sporadically detected in the vaccinated pigs. At 21 days after vaccination (the day of challenge), all pigs (Group 2, 3 and 4) inoculated with greater than 10 μg VLP had neutralizing antibody response to the challenging PCV2d strain, whereas the response was detected in the only one of four pigs (Group 1) inoculated with 2 μg VLP (Figure 3a). The neutralizing antibody titer of the Group 1 was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that of the other vaccinated pigs (Group 2, 3 and 4). However, it was not statistically different with the unvaccinated controls (Group 5 and 6). 14 days after challenge, all vaccinated pigs (Group 1, 2, 3 and 4) had the neutralizing antibodies and mean titers of the groups were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those of the unvaccinated controls (Group 5 and 6) (Figure 3b). Unvaccinated pigs did not show any neutralizing response throughout the experiment.

3.5. There Was No Difference in Average Daily Weight Gain (ADWG) between the Pigs Challenged with the Virulent PCV2d Isolate Regardless of Vaccination

Notable clinical signs and drastic increase of rectal temperature were not observed in any of the groups throughout the experiment. There was no significant difference in the mean clinical scores between vaccinated pigs (Group 1, 2, 3 and 4) and unvaccinated pigs (Group 5 and 6). The ADWG was also not significantly different between vaccinated and unvaccinated pigs throughout the experiment. All pigs had similar growth rate regardless of challenge (Table 2).

3.6. Viremia and Pathologic Lesion Score of Vaccinated Pigs Were Significantly Lower Than That of Non-Vaccinated Controls

At 7 days after challenge, the pigs (Group 2, 3 and 4) inoculated with greater than 10 μg VLP had significantly (p < 0.05) less genomic copies of the challenge virus than the unvaccinated challenged pigs (Group 5), whereas there was no significant difference on viral level between the pigs (Group 1) inoculated with 2 μg VLP and the control group (Group 5). 7 days after challenge, all vaccinated pigs (Group 1, 2, 3 and 4) had significantly (p < 0.05) less genomic copies than the unvaccinated challenged pigs (Group 5). There was also no significant difference on viral level between the vaccinated groups (Figure 4). PCV2 genomic DNA was not detected in any of unvaccinated unchallenged pigs (Group 6) throughout the experiment.
The typical lymphoid depletion was observed in challenged pigs. Moderate to severe follicular depletion lesions were identified in not only unvaccinated challenged pigs (Group 5) but also the pigs (Group 1) inoculated with 2 μg VLP (Figure 5). Mild granulomatous inflammation reaction was also observed in individual challenged pigs and PCV2-antigen associated with the lesions was detected. The pigs (Group 2, 3 and 4) inoculated with greater than 10 μg VLP had significantly (p < 0.05) lower histopathologic lesion score than the unvaccinated challenged pigs (Group 5) and the pigs (Group 1) inoculated with 2 μg VLP. Group 2, 3 and 4 also had significantly less PCV2-positive cells per unit area in the lymph node compared to groups 1 and 5 (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

PCV2 is one of the most economically important pathogens in the global swine industry. Various clinical signs associated with PCV2 infection have been reported, including wasting, increased mortality, respiratory signs, enteritis, dermatitis and reproductive disorders, in pigs of all ages [1,2,4,5]. The remarkable pathological feature of the infection is the enlargement of lymph nodes in affected pigs [6]. Severe lymphoid depletion, which is accompanied by diffuse infiltration of histiocytic cells, is also observed. Without vaccination, pigs exhibited aggravated weight loss, increased viremia level and severe lymphoid depletion lesions in a field study [33]. In the early 2000s, when the vaccine was not available, the mortality rate of affected pigs increased up to 80% [34].
Since commercial PCV2 vaccines have been launched, PCVAD has been receiving control in the field. The efficacy of commercial vaccines has been shown to be dependent on not only humoral immunity but also cell-mediated immunity, which can compensate for protection in the absence of detectable PCV2 antibodies in response to vaccination [35,36]. However, it is a neutralizing antibody that plays an important role in preventing virus entry into susceptible cells [25]. The elicited neutralizing antibody tends to correlate with the reduction of viral load from serum and tissue, indicating its protective effect against virus replication [25,27,35]. Therefore, an efficient vaccine is necessary to induce sufficient neutralizing antibodies to inhibit viral infection.
Most current commercial PCV2 vaccines are inactivated whole virus or subunit types, which contain the icosahedral virus particle as a major immunogen. The VLPs of subunit vaccines are reported to mimic the overall structure of the native virion and to be highly immunogenic, inducing humoral and cell-mediated immunity against PCVAD under field conditions [37]. The immunogen of subunit vaccines is commonly produced using the baculovirus expression system, which can secrete high levels of protein compared to porcine kidney-derived cell lines for whole virus production. The immunogen concentration in commercial vaccines can be dozens of times different depending on the vaccine type (data not shown).
In this study, we found that there was a baseline concentration in each animal model that elicited the antibody response, including neutralizing antibodies. The experiments suggested that 5 µg of VLP was essential to induce a stable humoral response in guinea pigs and 10 µg was needed in pigs. With injection into the intramuscular route, adjuvanted immunogens may be promptly exposed to blood and local immunity. Pathogen-associated molecular pattern motifs (PAMPs), which consist of the VLP, can trigger the activation of innate immune cells and be recognized by Toll-like receptors and other pattern-recognition receptors [38]. Subsequently, PAMPs can also stimulate the uptake of VLPs by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), especially dendritic cells. The antigen presentation of cells can lead to a strong adaptive humoral immune response [39,40,41]. Overall, the serial occurrence, including activation of the innate immune system and bridging with the adaptive response through presentation by APCs, may be based on the probability. A higher titer of antigens is more likely to be detected in multiple immune cells.
Antibodies against PCV2 were detected starting 1 weeks after vaccination. The titers of IgG and neutralizing antibodies were significantly higher in the pigs inoculated with more than 10 µg VLP than that in the other pigs 14 days after vaccination. After challenge, the neutralizing antibodies were still significantly higher in the pigs inoculated with more than 10 µg VLP, inhibiting viral replication in the serum and tissue. The pigs inoculated with more than 10 µg VLP showed significantly lower viremia and histopathological lesion scores than the unvaccinated challenged pigs. Meanwhile, clinical signs, weight gain and rectal temperature were normal in the groups regardless of vaccination, implying that the clinical symptoms caused by infection with the virulent PCV2d strain may be associated with several factors.
In conclusion, for the subunit vaccine type, 10 µg VLP is necessary to elicit stable neutralizing antibodies in pig models. It is considered to be a minimal dosage to trigger the immune system with the current formulation. The results may vary depending on the adjuvant, purification, antigenic fitness and inoculation route. All results can be useful and these data will be valuable for follow-up studies.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, J.-H.B., S.-H.C. (Sang-Ho Cha) and M.-S.L.; Investigation, J.-H.B., S.-H.C. (Sang-Ho Cha), S.-H.C. (Sun-Hee Cho) and C.P.; Writing—original draft, S.-H.C. (Sang-Ho Cha) and C.P.; Writing—review & editing, C.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant No. NRF-2021R1G1A1093612) and the Research and Development program of the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (Grant No. 00-17-8-0146-00).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the BioPOA Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (BP-2018-013-2).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data present in the study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Opriessnig, T.; Meng, X.J.; Halbur, P.G. Porcine circovirus type 2 associated disease: Update on current terminology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and intervention strategies. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2007, 19, 591–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Segalés, J.; Allan, G.M.; Domingo, M. Porcine circovirus diseases. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2005, 6, 119–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jacobsen, B.; Krueger, L.; Seeliger, F.; Bruegmann, M.; Segalés, J.; Baumgaertner, W. Retrospective study on the occurrence of porcine circovirus 2 infection and associated entities in Northern Germany. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 138, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Drolet, R.; Thibault, S.; D’Allaire, S.; Thomson, J.R.; Done, S.H. Porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome (PDNS): An overview of the disease. J. Swine Health Prod. 1999, 7, 283–285. [Google Scholar]
  5. Segalés, J.; Piella, J.; Marco, E.; de-Mateu-Antonio, E.M.; Espuna, E.; Domingo, M. Porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome in Spain. Vet. Rec. 1998, 142, 483–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Segalés, J. Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infections: Clinical signs, pathology and laboratory diagnosis. Virus Res. 2012, 164, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Franzo, G.; Cortey, M.; Segalés, J.; Hughes, J.; Drigo, M. Phylodynamic analysis of porcine circovirus type 2 reveals global waves of emerging genotypes and the circulation of recombinant forms. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2016, 100, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Firth, C.; Charleston, M.A.; Duffy, S.; Shapiro, B.; Holmes, E.C. Insights into the Evolutionary History of an Emerging Livestock Pathogen: Porcine Circovirus 2. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 12813–12821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Fenaux, M.; Halbur, P.G.; Gill, M.; Toth, T.E.; Meng, X.J. Genetic characterization of type 2 porcine circovirus (PCV-2) from pigs with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in different geographic regions of North America and development of a differential PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay to detect and differentiate between infections with PCV-1 and PCV-2. J. Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38, 2494–2503. [Google Scholar]
  10. Larochelle, R.; Magar, R.; D’Allaire, S. Genetic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) strains from cases presenting various clinical conditions. Virus Res. 2002, 90, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cheung, A.K.; Lager, K.M.; Kohutyuk, O.I.; Vincent, A.L.; Henry, S.C.; Baker, R.B.; Rowland, R.R.; Dunham, A.G. Detection of two porcine circovirus type 2 genotypic groups in United States swine herds. Arch. Virol. 2007, 152, 1035–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gagnon, C.A.; Tremblay, D.; Tijssen, P.; Venne, M.H.; Houde, A.; Elahi, S.M. The emergence of porcine circovirus 2b genotype (PCV-2b) in swine in Canada. Can. Vet. J. 2007, 48, 811–819. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Dupont, K.; Nielsen, E.O.; Bækbo, P.; Larsen, L.E. Genomic analysis of PCV2 isolates from Danish archives and a current PMWS case–control study supports a shift in genotypes with time. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 128, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Xiao, C.T.; Halbur, P.G.; Opriessnig, T. Global molecular genetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) sequences confirms the presence of four main PCV2 genotypes and reveals a rapid increase of PCV2d. J. Gen. Virol. 2015, 96, 1830–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Opriessnig, T.; Xiao, C.T.; Halbur, P.G.; Gerber, P.F.; Matzinger, S.R.; Meng, X.J. A commercial porcine circovirus (PCV) type 2a-based vaccine reduces PCV2d viremia and shedding and prevents PCV2d transmission to naïve pigs under experimental conditions. Vaccine 2017, 35, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Seo, H.W.; Park, C.; Kang, I.; Choi, K.; Jeong, J.; Park, S.J.; Chae, C. Genetic and antigenic characterization of a newly emerging porcine circovirus type 2b mutant first isolated in cases of vaccine failure in Korea. Arch. Virol. 2014, 159, 3107–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chae, C. Commercial porcine circovirus type 2 vaccines: Efficacy and clinical application. Vet. J. 2012, 194, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Opriessnig, T.; Gerber, P.F.; Xiao, C.-T.; Mogler, M.; Halbur, P.G. A commercial vaccine based on PCV2a and an experimental vaccine based on a variant mPCV2b are both effective in protecting pigs against challenge with a 2013 U.S. variant mPCV2b strain. Vaccine 2014, 32, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rose, N.; Andraud, M.; Bigault, L.; Jestin, A.; Grasland, B. A commercial PCV2a-based vaccine significantly reduces PCV2b transmission in experimental conditions. Vaccine 2016, 34, 3738–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fort, M.; Sibila, M.; Allepuz, A.; Mateu, E.; Roerink, F.; Segales, J. Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) vaccination of conventional pigs prevents viremia against PCV2 isolates of different genotypes and geographic origins. Vaccine 2008, 26, 1063–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cimica, V.; Galarza, J.M. Adjuvant formulations for virus-like particle (VLP) based vaccines. Clin. Immunol. 2017, 183, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vicente, T.; Roldão, A.; Peixoto, C.; Carrondo, M.J.T.; Alves, P.M. Large-scale production and purification of VLP-based vaccines. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2011, 107, S42–S48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khurana, S.; Wu, J.; Verma, N.; Verma, S.; Raghunandan, R.; Manischewitz, J.; King, L.R.; Kpamegan, E.; Pincus, S.; Smith, G.; et al. H5N1 virus-like particle vaccine elicits cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies that preferentially bind to the oligomeric form of influenza virus hemagglutinin in humans. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 10945–10954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bachmann, M.F.; Zinkernagel, R.M. Neutralizing antiviral B cell responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1997, 15, 235–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Meerts, P.; Misinzo, G.; Lefebvre, D.; Nielsen, J.; Botner, A.; Kristensen, C.S.; Nauwynck, H.J. Correlation between the presence of neutralizing antibodies against porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) and protection against replication of the virus and development of PCV2-associated disease. BMC Vet. Res. 2006, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Jin, J.; Park, C.; Cho, S.H.; Chung, J. The level of decoy epitope in PCV2 vaccine affects the neutralizing activity of sera in the immunized animals. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 496, 846–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fort, M.; Olvera, A.; Sibila, M.; Segalés, J.; Mateu, E. Detection of neutralizing antibodies in postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS)-affected and non-PMWS-affected pigs. Vet. Microbiol. 2007, 125, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Pogranichnyy, R.M.; Yoon, K.J.; Harms, P.A.; Swenson, S.L.; Zimmerman, J.J.; Sorden, S.D. Characterization of immune response of young pigs to porcine circovirus type 2 infection. Viral Immunol. 2000, 13, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Seo, H.W.; Han, K.; Oh, Y.; Park, C.; Chae, C. Efficacy of a reformulated inactivated chimeric PCV1-2 vaccine based on clinical, virological, pathological and immunological examination under field conditions. Vaccine 2012, 30, 6671–6677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gagnon, C.A.; del Castillo, J.R.; Music, N.; Fontaine, G.; Harel, J.; Tremblay, D. Development and use of a multiplex real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for detection and differentiation of Porcine circovirus-2 genotypes 2a and 2b in an epidemiological survey. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2008, 20, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Fenaux, M.; Halbur, P.G.; Haqshenas, G. Cloned genomic DNA of type 2 porcine circovirus is infectious when injected directly into the liver and lymph nodes of pigs: Characterization of clinical disease, virus distribution, and pathologic lesions. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Kim, J.; Chae, C. A comparison of virus isolation, polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and in situ hybridization for the detection of porcine circovirus 2 and porcine parvovirus in experimentally and naturally coinfected pigs. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2004, 16, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Jeong, J.; Park, C.; Choi, K.; Chae, C. Comparison of three commercial one-dose porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) vaccines in a herd with concurrent circulation of PCV2b and mutant PCV2b. Vet. Microbiol. 2015, 177, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rodriguez, A.G.M.; Segales, J.; Rosell, C.; Quintana, J.; Ayllon, S.; Camprodon, A.; Domingo, M. Aujeszky’s disease virus infection concurrent with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in pigs. Vet. Rec. 1999, 144, 152–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Perez-Martin, E.; Gomez-Sebastian, S.; Argilaguet, J.M.; Sibila, M.; Fort, M.; Nofrarias, M.; Kurtz, S.; Escribano, J.M.; Segalés, J.; Rodríguez, F. Immunity conferred by an experimental vaccine based on the recombinant PCV2 Cap protein expressed in Trichoplusia ni-larvae. Vaccine 2010, 28, 2340–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fenaux, M.; Opriessnig, T.; Halbur, P.G.; Elvinger, F.; Meng, X.J. A chimeric porcine circovirus (PCV) with the immunogenic capsid gene of the pathogenic PCV type 2 (PCV2) cloned into the genomic backbone of the nonpathogenic PCV1 induces protective immunity against PCV2 infection in pigs. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 6297–6303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Martelli, P.; Ferrari, L.; Morganti, M.; De Angelis, E.; Bonilauri, P.; Guazzetti, S.; Caleffi, A.; Borghetti, P. One dose of a porcine circovirus 2 subunit vaccine induces humoral and cell-mediated immunity and protects against porcine circovirus-associated disease under field conditions. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 149, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Plummer, E.M.; Manchester, M. Viral nanoparticles and virus-like particles: Platforms for contemporary vaccine design. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2011, 3, 174–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Murata, K.; Lechmann, M.; Qiao, M.; Gunji, T.; Alter, H.; Liang, T.J. Immunization with hepatitis C virus-like particles protects mice from recombinant hepatitis C virus-vaccinia infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 6753–6758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Paliard, X.; Liu, Y.; Wagner, R.; Wolf, H.; Baenziger, J.; Walker, C.M. Priming of strong, broad, and long-lived HIV type 1 p55gag-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T cells after administration of a virus-like particle vaccine in rhesus macaques. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 2000, 16, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tissot, A.C.; Renhofa, R.; Schmitz, N.; Cielens, I.; Meijerink, E.; Ose, V.; Jennings, G.T.; Saudan, P.; Pumpens, P.; Bachmann, M.F. Versatile virus-like particle carrier for epitope based vaccines. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Pathogens 10 01644 g001 550
Figure 1. Mean titers of the anti PCV2 antibodies in different treatment guinea pigs. * indicates significant difference (p value < 0.05) between Group 1 vs. Group 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Figure 1. Mean titers of the anti PCV2 antibodies in different treatment guinea pigs. * indicates significant difference (p value < 0.05) between Group 1 vs. Group 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Pathogens 10 01644 g001
Pathogens 10 01644 g002 550
Figure 2. Mean levels of anti PCV2 IgG responses in different treatment pigs. * indicates significant difference (p value < 0.05) between Group 1 vs. Group 2, 3 and 4. † indicates significant difference between Group 1 vs. Group 3 and 4. ‡ indicates significant difference between Group 1, 2, 3 and 4 vs. Group 5 and 6.
Figure 2. Mean levels of anti PCV2 IgG responses in different treatment pigs. * indicates significant difference (p value < 0.05) between Group 1 vs. Group 2, 3 and 4. † indicates significant difference between Group 1 vs. Group 3 and 4. ‡ indicates significant difference between Group 1, 2, 3 and 4 vs. Group 5 and 6.
Pathogens 10 01644 g002
Pathogens 10 01644 g003 550
Figure 3. Mean titers of serum neutralizing antibodies in the different treatment pigs at 21 dpv, days post vaccination (a) and 35 dpv (b). * indicates significant difference (p value < 0.05) between Group 1 vs. Group 2, 3 and 4. † indicates significant difference between Group 1, 2, 3 and 4 vs. Group 5 and 6.
Figure 3. Mean titers of serum neutralizing antibodies in the different treatment pigs at 21 dpv, days post vaccination (a) and 35 dpv (b). * indicates significant difference (p value < 0.05) between Group 1 vs. Group 2, 3 and 4. † indicates significant difference between Group 1, 2, 3 and 4 vs. Group 5 and 6.
Pathogens 10 01644 g003
Pathogens 10 01644 g004 550
Figure 4. Mean genomic copy numbers of PCV2d DNA in serum from different groups. * indicates significant difference (p value < 0.05) between Group 5 vs. Group 2, 3, 4 and 6. † indicates significant difference between Group 5 vs. Group 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6.
Figure 4. Mean genomic copy numbers of PCV2d DNA in serum from different groups. * indicates significant difference (p value < 0.05) between Group 5 vs. Group 2, 3, 4 and 6. † indicates significant difference between Group 5 vs. Group 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6.
Pathogens 10 01644 g004
Pathogens 10 01644 g005 550
Figure 5. Histopathologic evaluation of lymphoid follicles from different groups on necropsy. * indicates significant difference (p value < 0.05) between Group 1 and 5 vs. Group 2, 3, 4 and 6.
Figure 5. Histopathologic evaluation of lymphoid follicles from different groups on necropsy. * indicates significant difference (p value < 0.05) between Group 1 and 5 vs. Group 2, 3, 4 and 6.
Pathogens 10 01644 g005
Table
Table 1. Group design of the animal experiments.
Table 1. Group design of the animal experiments.
Guinea Pig Experiment
Group 1Group 2Group 3Group 4Group 5
1st vaccination1 μg VLP5 μg VLP10 μg VLP30 μg VLPNone
2nd vaccination1 μg VLP5 μg VLP10 μg VLP30 μg VLPNone
Pig Challenge Experiment
Group 1Group 2Group 3Group 4Group 5Group 6
Vaccination2 μg VLP10 μg VLP20 μg VLP60 μg VLPNoneNone
ChallengePCV2dPCV2dPCV2dPCV2dPCV2dNone
Table
Table 2. Average daily weight gain (ADWG) from the different pig groups (group mean ± standard error).
Table 2. Average daily weight gain (ADWG) from the different pig groups (group mean ± standard error).
Pig Challenge Experiment
Group 1Group 2Group 3Group 4Group 5Group 6
0~7 dpv
ADWG132 ± 21442 ± 141289 ± 374157 ± 141267 ± 133310 ± 118
7~14 dpv
ADWG375 ± 86414 ± 117389 ± 102428 ± 76425 ± 114464 ± 37
14~21 dpv
ADWG560 ± 101410 ± 155414 ± 192621 ± 99467 ± 44582 ± 105
21~28 dpv
ADWG432 ± 147653 ± 81582 ± 119553 ± 108471 ± 144564 ± 66
28~35 dpv
ADWG703 ± 131514 ± 182567 ± 97635 ± 158492 ± 245621 ± 170
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baek, J.-H.; Cha, S.-H.; Cho, S.-H.; Lee, M.-S.; Park, C. Minimal Dosage of Porcine Circovirus Type 2d Based Virus-like Particles to Induce Stable Protective Immunity against Infection. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121644

AMA Style

Baek J-H, Cha S-H, Cho S-H, Lee M-S, Park C. Minimal Dosage of Porcine Circovirus Type 2d Based Virus-like Particles to Induce Stable Protective Immunity against Infection. Pathogens. 2021; 10(12):1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121644

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baek, Jong-Hyuk, Sang-Ho Cha, Sun-Hee Cho, Myung-Shin Lee, and Changhoon Park. 2021. "Minimal Dosage of Porcine Circovirus Type 2d Based Virus-like Particles to Induce Stable Protective Immunity against Infection" Pathogens 10, no. 12: 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121644

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop