Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Chagas Western Blot IgG Assay for the Diagnosis of Chagas Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Technologies for Detection of Babesia microti: Advances and Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
“Shining a LAMP” (Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification) on the Molecular Detection of Phytopathogens Phytophthora spp. and Phytophthora cactorum in Strawberry Fields
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Global Emergence of Human Babesiosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Silico Survey and Characterization of Babesia microti Functional and Non-Functional Proteases

by
Monica Florin-Christensen
1,2,*,
Sarah N. Wieser
1,2,
Carlos E. Suarez
3,4 and
Leonhard Schnittger
1,2
1
Instituto de Patobiologia Veterinaria (IPVET), Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronomicas, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Hurlingham C1033AAE, Argentina
2
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires C1033AAJ, Argentina
3
Animal Disease Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Pullman, WA 99163, USA
4
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(11), 1457; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111457
Submission received: 18 September 2021 / Revised: 29 October 2021 / Accepted: 6 November 2021 / Published: 10 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Babesia and Human Babesiosis)

Abstract

:
Human babesiosis caused by the intraerythrocytic apicomplexan Babesia microti is an expanding tick-borne zoonotic disease that may cause severe symptoms and death in elderly or immunocompromised individuals. In light of an increasing resistance of B. microti to drugs, there is a lack of therapeutic alternatives. Species-specific proteases are essential for parasite survival and possible chemotherapeutic targets. However, the repertoire of proteases in B. microti remains poorly investigated. Herein, we employed several combined bioinformatics tools and strategies to organize and identify genes encoding for the full repertoire of proteases in the B. microti genome. We identified 64 active proteases and 25 nonactive protease homologs. These proteases can be classified into cysteine (n = 28), serine (n = 21), threonine (n = 14), asparagine (n = 7), and metallopeptidases (n = 19), which, in turn, are assigned to a total of 38 peptidase families. Comparative studies between the repertoire of B. bovis and B. microti proteases revealed differences among sensu stricto and sensu lato Babesia parasites that reflect their distinct evolutionary history. Overall, this data may help direct future research towards our understanding of the biology and pathogenicity of Babesia parasites and to explore proteases as targets for developing novel therapeutic interventions.

1. Introduction

Human babesiosis caused by Babesia microti is a malaria-like tick-borne zoonotic disease, first described in the 1950s in the USA, with an increasing number of cases reported ever since in this and other countries around the world [1]. Infections proceed asymptomatic or are accompanied by mild or moderate signs in immunocompetent patients but often lead to severe disease and even death in neonates and the elderly or immunocompromised adults [2].
Some wild rodents act as natural reservoirs of B. microti, where the parasite is transmitted both by bites of Ixodes sp. ticks, as well as transplacentally [3,4]. Humans are dead-end hosts and suffer accidental infections mainly through tick bites. Transplacental and blood transfusion-related transmissions have also been documented [1,5,6].
Currently, there is no specific therapy for B. microti human babesiosis [7]. The recommended therapeutic drugs to treat B. microti infections are azithromycin plus atovaquone as the first choice or a combination of clindamycin and quinine as an alternative [7,8]. However, the reported appearance of B. microti parasites resistant to the first two drugs in chronically infected patients and the negative side effects of the latter two call for the development of alternative therapeutic strategies and increased investments in this field [2,7,8,9,10].
B. microti belongs to the Apicomplexa phylum and, as such, has a mandatory parasitic lifestyle that alternates between its definitive tick host and its intermediate mammalian hosts. Complex physiological processes and molecular interactions between the pathogen and host are needed for invasion, egress, parasite development in the tick stages, and migration processes that lead to the completion of the parasite life cycle and its efficient perpetuation and dissemination. Among the molecules involved in these events, parasite proteases, i.e., enzymes that catalyze proteolytic cleavages, are bound to be of paramount importance [2,11,12].
Indeed, proteases of the model Apicomplexan protozoans Toxoplasma gondii and Plasmodium falciparum have been shown to participate in several essential physiological processes, including nutrient acquisition and processing, invasion and egress from host cells, protein recycling, posttranslational processing, and signal transduction, among others [13,14,15]. Due to their vital roles and the fact that they show low or no identity with host-encoded peptidases, parasite proteases have been proposed as potential drug targets and/or vaccine candidates [16,17,18,19,20]. In the case of Babesia spp., the importance of peptidases for parasite survival and their potential as therapeutic targets are highlighted by several studies showing that different protease inhibitors significantly impede parasite growth in vitro and/or in vivo [21,22,23,24,25].
The present study aims to shortlist the proteases encoded in the B. microti genome by organizing the information available in the MEROPS protease database, as well as identifying additional peptidases by homology searches for paralogs within the B. microti genome and orthologs of previously described active proteases of B. bovis [26]. We also tested the hypothesis that the repertoires of functional proteases encoded in the genomes of B. bovis and B. microti differ, possibly due to the peculiarities displayed in their life cycles and their different phylogenetic placements [27,28]. The information recorded in this study can be applied to future research aimed at understanding the biology of this emergent pathogen and designing new therapeutic interventions.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Survey of B. microti Proteases

The present study shows that the B. microti genome encodes for at least 64 active proteases and 25 non active protease homologs. These proteases belong to the cysteine (n = 28), serine (n = 21), threonine (n = 14), aspartic (n = 7), and metallopeptidase (n = 19) types, which, in turn, are assigned to a total of 38 peptidase families (Table 1).
The classification into peptidase types refers to the nature of the nucleophile in the hydrolytic reaction, which can be the thiol of a cysteine in cysteine peptidases, the hydroxyl of a serine, or a threonine residue in serine and threonine peptidases, respectively, or water bound to aspartic acid or to a metal ion in aspartic and metallopeptidases, respectively. An additional protease group has been described, the glutamic peptidases, in which the nucleophile is water bound to a glutamic acid residue, but these enzymes are absent in Apicomplexan protozoa. Peptidases of each type are assigned into families according to sequence similarities. Non active protease homologs are characterized by bearing a conserved protease domain but lacking in the active site one or more of the critical amino acids needed for catalysis [29].
Twenty of the proteases presented in this study are not included in the MEROPS database and were identified by homology searches. In addition, five of the proteases listed in Table 1 presented duplicated MEROPS entries, likely because of the use of different sources of peptide sequences in this database (Table 1). On the other hand, a number of B. microti proteases have been annotated in GenBank as hypothetical proteins, uncharacterized proteins, or following the designation of another conserved domain also present in the sequences, and they are, thus, not identifiable by searches using keywords such as protease or peptidase. Importantly, despite the exhaustive search carried out to produce the list presented in Table 1, the presence of additional protease-coding genes in the B. microti genome that passed inadvertently in this study cannot be ruled out. In addition, it should be noted that the predicted catalytic activity for some threonine proteases (Table 1) could not be determined beyond doubt and needs to be confirmed experimentally.
All of the listed active and non active proteases are transcribed in B. microti merozoites, suggesting they likely fulfill a relevant functional role in this parasite stage [30]. In addition, 17 active and non active proteases were identified in the proteomic profile of B. microti during the acute infection of a hamster model (Table 1) [31]. Proteases that remained undetected might be expressed in low amounts at the intraerythrocytic stage or bear physicochemical characteristics that preclude detection by the experimental approach employed in this study [31].
Localization predictor algorithms located most of the identified proteases in the cytoplasm. Four proteases were predicted as extracellular and six as lysosomal. The latter might reach the extracellular milieu by the fusion of vacuoles with the plasma membrane, as has been shown for Tetrahymena thermophila, a free-living protozoon belonging together with Apicomplexa to Alveolata. However, this mechanism has not been demonstrated for Babesia spp. [32]. Other predicted locations include the nucleus, the mitochondria, a plastid (which would correspond to the apicoplast, in this case), the plasma membrane, the endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi apparatus, and the peroxisomes (Supplementary Table S3). Importantly, these predictions are only tentative until they have been experimentally confirmed. Additionally, the used algorithm is not able to predict the location of proteases in Apicomplexa-specific secretory organelles, such as rhoptries and micronemes, where the trafficking of proteases has been shown to occur in Plasmodium and Toxoplasma [33].

2.2. Aspartic Proteases

Seven aspartic proteases were found in the B. microti-predicted proteome, all of which bear the aspartate and, in the case of the A1 family, also the phenylalanine or tyrosine residues in their active sites, needed to display catalytic activity (Table 1).
Interestingly, a recent transcriptomics study involving four of the five A1 aspartic protease genes of B. microti showed stage-associated expression for two of them. Thus, while BmR1_01G02485 (encoding cathepsin E-B or ASP2) displayed higher expression in mouse blood intraerythrocytic stages than in the stages present in I. ricinus gut or salivary glands, the opposite was true for BmR1_03g03850 (encoding ASP6). These results suggest a role for ASP2 in processes connected to the asexual reproduction of the parasite and/or gametocyte formation and, for ASP6, in zygote and/or kinete development, kinete dissemination in tick tissues, including salivary glands, and sporogony. For the other two studied A1 aspartic protease-encoding genes, BmR1_04g07350 and BmR1_04g05270, corresponding to ASP3 and ASP5, respectively, expression was similar in the three stages, suggesting a role in invasion both of erythrocytes and tick cells or in other cellular processes such as secretion or the trafficking of proteins [34].
Aspartic proteases have been proposed as chemotherapeutic targets against B. microti. Indeed, the aspartic protease inhibitors Lopinavir and Atazanavir, which are well-tolerated drugs used in HIV patients, were shown to be potent suppressors of B. microti infection in vitro, as well as in vivo, in a mouse model [24]. It is unknown which parasite aspartic protease is affected by these inhibitors, but one candidate is the signal peptide peptidase (SPP, XP_021338622), which has a critical role in the maintenance of the homeostasis of the endoplasmic reticulum. Consistent with this view, in the case of P. falciparum, these inhibitors were effective in blocking SPP activity and in vitro parasite growth [24,35]. Notably, B. microti and Plasmodium sp. SPP proteins are orthologous (results not shown) but do not have a counterpart in B. bovis (Supplementary Table S4) or any other Babesia sp. (not shown).
Hemoglobin is certainly the main protein source available for the nutrition of intraerythrocytic parasites. The sequential steps for hemoglobin degradation by Plasmodium sp., as described by Guzman et al. 1994 [36], start with the unwinding of the molecule and partial digestion by aspartic proteases, followed by cysteine protease cleavage, which yields protein fragments that are finally degraded by exopeptidases, generating free amino acids useful for parasite nutrition. In Plasmodium sp., the first part of this process takes place in the food vacuole and involves the aspartic proteases Plasmepsins I-IV and is then followed by the action of papain-like cysteine proteases in the erythrocyte cytoplasm [37]. There is no evidence that a food vacuole is present in B. microti, and consistent with its absence, Plasmepsins I-IV homologs cannot be found in this parasite. The lack of these enzymes has been used as an argument to postulate that B. microti is not able to degrade hemoglobin [38]. However, it may be hypothesized that other B. microti aspartyl proteases of the A1 family (Table 1), likely secreted to the erythrocyte cytoplasm, are able to initiate hemoglobin degradation, such as pepsin A (XP_021337801), predicted to have a signal peptide and, thus, be exported to the erythrocyte cytoplasm (Supplementary Table S3). To find out whether this is the case or there is an alternative protein source available for the nutrition of the intraerythrocytic trophozoite and merozoite stages would need experimental exploration.

2.3. Cysteine Proteases

Cysteine proteinases are involved in the essential biological roles of Apicomplexan parasites [13,39,40]. They are present in B. microti with at least 27 members, of which 18 are predicted to be catalytically active (Table 1).
In P. falciparum, the papain-like falcipain-2 and falcipain-3 peptidases of the C1A family have attracted the most attention among cysteine proteases as potential therapeutic targets against malaria [41]. As mentioned above, these enzymes participate in hemoglobin degradation in the intraerythrocytic stage of the parasite, and, in addition, falcipain-2 has been shown to cleave erythrocyte cytoskeletal proteins during egress from the host cell [42,43]. Falcipain-2 orthologs have been characterized in B. bovis, B. bigemina, and B. ovis and have been named bovipain-2, babesipain, and ovipain-2, respectively. Similar to their P. falciparum counterpart, they are expressed inside merozoites and also released to the erythrocyte cytoplasm, consistent with the dual role described for falcipain-2 [44,45,46,47]. The significant impairment of the in vitro growth of B. ovis and B. bovis merozoites by antibodies against ovipain-2 and a papain-like C1A cysteine protease, respectively, indicate a relevant role of this type of enzymes in the propagation of the asexual stages of Babesia spp. [47,48].
The B. microti ortholog of falcipain-2 (XP_012650559) has four paralogs (three active proteases and one non-protease homolog), one of which is 100% identical (XP_012650562; Table 1). The corresponding genes for these two identical proteins are located on the same strand of chromosome 3, separated by a ~5 kb intergenic region, where two unrelated genes are found in the opposite strand. Predictor algorithms localized XP_012650559 and XP_012650562, either within lysosomes or other vacuoles or secreted through a non classical pathway (Supplementary Table S3). This predicted localization agrees well with that described for their counterparts in B. bovis, B. bigemina, and B. ovis [44,45,46,47,48]. In a recent study, an enzymatically active recombinant form of B. microti XP_012650559 (rBmCYP) was expressed in E. coli. The activity of rBmCYP against a fluorescent peptide was significantly inhibited by recombinant forms of the cysteine protease inhibitors cystatins 1 and 2 of Riphicephalus haemaphysaloides ticks [49]. Although R. haemaphysaloides is not a typical B. microti-transmitting tick, it has been suggested as a potential vector for this parasite in China [50]. These results coincide with the inhibition exerted by R. microplus cystatins on a B. bovis C1A cysteine protease and suggest the involvement of these enzymes in tick host–pathogen interactions [51]
Interestingly, the phylogenetic analysis of C1A cysteine protease paralog profiles of piroplasmids of the Babesia, Theileria and Cytauxzoon genera corroborates the assignment of analyzed species into Clades I–VI according to their 18S rRNA gene sequences [27,52].

2.4. Serine Proteases

At least thirteen functional serine proteases and eight non functional protease homologs belonging to nine families are encoded in the B. microti genome (Table 1).
A prominent group of serine proteases is constituted by the S54 family, which consists of rhomboid proteases (ROMs). ROMs were first described in Drosophila melanogaster and later shown to be present in all kingdoms of life, fulfilling various relevant roles, including cell signaling in animals, quorum sensing in bacteria, homeostasis regulation in mitochondria, and the dismantling of adhesion complexes in apicomplexan protozoa. They are characterized by having six to seven transmembrane domains and their active site embedded in the lipid bilayer [53,54].
ROMs have been thoroughly studied in the apicomplexans Toxoplasma gondii and Plasmodium spp. The former encodes ROM1–6, according to the nomenclature defined by Dowse and Soldati, 2005 [55], all of which have, with exception of ROM2, homologs in P. falciparum. The latter parasite has four additional ROMs that are not present in T. gondii, designated ROM7–10 [56,57]. T. gondii and Plasmodium sp. ROM4 proteases were shown to cleave parasite adhesins, thus dismantling the adhesive junctions formed between the membranes of the host and parasite, a process needed for parasite internalization into the host cell [53,57]. Due to their critical role in invasion, ROMs are regarded as potential targets for therapeutic interventions against apicomplexans [58]. Indeed, two ROM4 inhibitors were shown to specifically block the P. falciparum invasion of human erythrocytes [59]. Additionally, experimental vaccine formulations based on T. gondii and Emeria tenella ROM4 were able to partially protect mice and chickens, respectively, against challenges [20,60].
In a recent study, ROM-coding genes were identified in the genomes of several piroplasmids and shown to belong exclusively to the ROM4, ROM6, ROM7, and ROM8 types. While the latter three were always present in a single copy, two to five ROM4 paralogs could be found depending on the piroplasmid lineage analyzed [61]. B. microti has two ROM4 paralogs, one of which (XP_021338238) has been misannotated as “ROM3” in GenBank (Table 1). ROM4 proteinases are found exclusively throughout the phylum Apicomplexa, which is consistent with their predicted role in invasion of the host cell, a critical mechanism for these obligate parasites [56]. ROM6, on the other hand, is the only piroplasmid rhomboid not exclusive to apicomplexans and has been shown to participate in various processes, including mitochondrial homeostasis, apoptosis, and the electron transport chain [62]. Accordingly, a mitochondrial localization was predicted for B. microti ROM6 (XP_021338360; Supplementary Table S3). B. microti ROM7 (XP_012650510) and ROM8 (XP_021338098) were predicted to localize in the membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus, respectively (Supplementary Table S3). These two types of ROMs are present in Plasmodium sp. and piroplasmids but not in other apicomplexans. Their functions are unknown but could be related to processes shared by all Aconoidasida, such as those that take place during the intraerythrocytic stage [61]. Finally, three members of the “derlin” subfamily were found in B. microti (Table 1). Derlins are catalytically inactive members of the Rhomboid Superfamily and were first described in yeast and later found in mammals and other organisms. Their function is still unclear, but it has been suggested that they could be part of a channel through which misfolded proteins are retro-translocated from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytoplasm prior to their ubiquitination and degradation [63].
Notably, for B. bovis, one of the ROM-encoding genes (XP_001610128) was found to be significantly higher expressed in the parasite stages present in the hemolymph of Rhipicephalus microplus ticks as compared to the stages present in bovine blood, suggesting that the role of this protease is mostly associated with the development of the parasite in the tick [64]. It remains to be analyzed whether a similar scenario takes place for the corresponding orthologs in B. microti and other piroplasmids.
In an early study, the serine protease activity of B. bovis merozoite homogenates was found to be higher in two virulent than in two avirulent strains from Australia, and thus, these proteases were postulated as virulence determinants [65]. However, in a later study, all the genes encoding for active proteases (n = 66) were shown to be present and transcribed to similar levels in the asexual blood stages of a B. bovis virulent parental strain and an attenuated strain, obtained by successive blood passages in splenectomized bovines [26]. These data suggest that the virulent/attenuated phenotype in this parasite is not related to a different peptidase gene content or to changes in the transcriptional levels of any peptidase-coding gene. To establish whether or not parasite serine or other types of proteases are virulence determinants in Babesia spp. will need further experimental evidence, but in any case, their relevance for pathogenicity is based on the vital role they probably fulfill in the parasitic lifestyle.

2.5. Metalloproteases

Metalloproteases contain a metal ion at their active site, which acts as a catalyst in the hydrolysis of peptide bonds, and are represented by at least 17 active and two non active protease homologs in B. microti (Table 1) [29].
Among them, methionine aminopeptidases (MAPs), which are present with four members in B. microti (M24A family, Table 1), take care of the N-terminal methionine excision from polypeptides, general metabolism of amino acids and proteins, and regulation processes that imply the activation and inactivation of biologically active peptides [66]. Inhibitors of MAPs significantly reduced the in vitro growth of P. falciparum, B. bovis, B. bigemina, B. caballi, and T. equi, highlighting a relevant role of MAPs in the survival of these parasites [23,67]. Moreover, B. microti-infected mice treated with MAP inhibitors reached significantly lower parasitemia levels than untreated mice [23]. Additionally, one of the B. microti MAPs (XP_012649271) was tested in mice as a potential vaccine candidate for human babesiosis. Immunization with an E. coli-expressed recombinant form of this MAP induced a Th1 immune response characterized by IgG2a antibody titers and IFN-γ production, and provided partial protection against the challenge with B. microti [68]. Although the number of boosters and protein amounts needed to achieve this effect would not be practical to apply in humans, these results suggest a potential usefulness of MAPs in future vaccine formulations against B. microti.

2.6. Threonine Proteases and the Proteasome

The proteasome is a cylindrically shaped large complex of proteins in charge of degrading intracellular proteins destined for destruction that have been tagged with polyubiquitin chains, thereby controlling many cellular processes, such as cell cycle progression and cell signaling [69,70]. All B. microti threonine proteases are proteasome constituents (seven alpha and seven beta 20S proteasome subunits, Table 1). Additionally, a metalloprotease with a proteasome regulatory function is also listed among the B. microti proteases (XP_021338577 of the M67 family), while assignment of other proteases to this structure needs experimental confirmation. Due to their vital role in cell physiology, drugs targeting proteasome functions have been proposed as therapeutics against several parasitic diseases [71,72,73]. In the case of Babesia sp., the proteasome inhibitors epoxyketones and boronic acid were shown to reduce the chymotrypsin activity of the proteasome in lysates of B. divergens in vitro cultures, leading to the accumulation of poli-ubiquinated proteins and, also, impeding parasite growth in vitro [24]. One of the epoxyketones, carfilzomib, was also assayed in B. microti-infected mice. Carfilzomib is a covalent and irreversible peptide inhibitor of the β5 subunit of the human proteasome approved for the clinical treatment of multiple myeloma [74]. Blood lysates of B. microti-infected mice treated with carfilzomib also showed the accumulation of poli-ubiquinated proteins as compared to untreated mice. Moreover, carfilzomib treatment reduced the peak parasitemia levels without apparent toxic effects in the treated mice. Although the dose required to eliminate the parasite would be toxic when applied in humans, these studies indicate that specifically targeting the B. microti proteasome would be a possible chemotherapeutic approach against this parasite [24].

2.7. Comparison between B. microti and B. bovis Functional Proteases

The genome of B. microti is the smallest among Apicomplexans and encodes 7% less genes compared to that of B. bovis. This difference is mainly due to the large vesa and SmORF multigene families present in B. bovis, which are absent in B. microti [38]. These two gene families encode for highly variable proteins that are involved in escaping the immune system of the vertebrate host and cytoadhesion [75,76]. It remains unknown whether strategies to escape effectors of the immune system exist in B. microti. However, cytoadhesion, especially affecting brain capillaries, has not been described as a major pathogenic mechanism for this parasite [2]. Other unraveled differences include the lack of spherical body proteins in B. microti, consistent with a reduced apical complex [38]. Additionally, contrary to B. bovis, B. microti does not have an oligosaccharyl transferase in charge of transferring a (NAcGlc)2 moiety from a lipid-linked oligosaccharide to a nascent protein destined for the secretory pathway in the endoplasmic reticulum. Thus, a significant difference among B. bovis and B. microti is the lack of ability of the latter to produce N-glycosylated proteins [77].
In the present study, we hypothesized that the differences between B. bovis and B. microti include the repertoire of active proteases encoded in their genomes. By orthology searches, we observed that most B. bovis active proteases have an ortholog in B. microti (Supplementary Table S4). The lack of orthology was connected in all but two cases to the expansion of a protease-coding ancestor gene into different numbers of paralogs, which most likely took place after the separation of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of B. bovis and B. microti, and thus, they differentiate both species. However, the S8 family of serine proteases is present with a single member, a subtilisin-like protein (XP_001610126), only in B. bovis but is absent in B. microti. The B. bovis subtilisin-like protein gene is syntenic with orthologous genes in B. divergens, B. ovata, and Babesia sp. Xinjang (data not shown). Importantly, characterization of the subtilisin-like protein of B. divergens showed that it localizes to dense granules and contains neutralization-sensitive B-cell epitopes, consistent with a relevant role in the invasion or establishment of the parasite in the infected erythrocyte, as observed for subtilisin-1 and subtilisin-2 in P. falciparum [78,79,80]. The other case is B. microti SPP aspartic protease (XP_021338622), which is absent in B. bovis and other Babesia spp., as mentioned above. The identification of genes absent in B. microti and present in other Babesia spp. or vice versa can allow comprehending the minimum protein dotation needed to fulfill a basic Babesia sp. life cycle, as well as to identify which proteins are associated with species-specific peculiarities and can also be exploited for differential diagnosis, therapeutic, and vaccine developments. B. bovis and B. microti share important similarities in their life cycles, namely being tick-transmitted and having an asexual reproduction stage exclusively within the erythrocytes of their vertebrate hosts. However, they differ in tick and vertebrate host species, as well as by the presence or absence of transovarial transmission in the tick. Transovarial transmission is, indeed, a trademark of the “true” babesias or Babesia sensu stricto, such as B. bovis, while those members of the Babesia genus that do not have this trait, such as B. microti, are considered Babesia sensu lato [27,28,81]. These differences are undoubtedly connected with the evolutionary history of B. bovis and B. microti, which can be clearly visualized by their phylogenetic placement into two distant clades (Clades VI and I, respectively, according to Schnittger et al., 2012 and 2021 [27,28].

2.8. Non-Peptidase Homologs

At least 25 non-peptidase homologs are encoded in the B. microti genome (Table 1). A conserved protease domain can be predicted in their sequences, but they lack one or more of the catalytically relevant amino acids. Non-peptidase homologs are commonly found among living organisms and believed to have evolved from catalytically active enzymes. They have lost their catalytic capacity but developed new functions, such as competitive inhibition regulating their active counterparts or even completely new non-protease-related activities [82,83]. An extreme case of loss of function is observed with a group of paralogs of B. microti that include three metalloproteases of the M41 family and 14 other non-protease members. Different from other non-peptidase homologs, the latter do not have a recognizable protease active site region. According to their conserved domains, their functions include the hydrolysis of nucleoside triphosphates, fusion of vesicles, intracellular transport, and proteasome regulation (Supplementary Table S1).

2.9. Conclusions and Perspectives

Proteases are attractive targets against a large number of infectious agents, since many of them are druggable and participate in essential biological processes of pathogenic virus, bacteria, protozoa, and fungi [84]. Indeed, several protease inhibitors are commercially available, and some are successfully employed in the treatment of HIV and Hepatitis C [85,86]. The use of protease inhibitors against other relevant viruses, such as dengue and SARS-CoV-2, has also been postulated [87,88].
The present study was aimed at organizing the available information of B. microti proteases and extending the array of identified peptidases encoded in its genome. This information is expected to set the stage for future research directed to understand the biology and pathogenicity of this parasite and to explore proteases as targets for developing novel therapeutic interventions. Recent advances in B. microti gene editing will permit exploring the functional relevance of selected proteases [89,90]. In addition, the application of computer-based inhibitor screening and the use of optimized pipelines to test drug efficacies using in vitro cultures and animal models allows obtaining new therapeutics against human babesiosis in a relatively short period of time [34,91,92].

3. Materials and Methods

The proteases of B. microti, R1 strain, presented in this study were identified by three different search approaches: (i) extracting and organizing the data available for this parasite in the MEROPS database (www.ebi.ac.uk/merops/, accessed on 1 September 2021) [29], (ii) the identification of homologs of B. bovis proteases predicted as active, as reported by Mesplet et al. (2011) [26], and (iii) the search for paralogs of B. microti proteases identified in (i) and (ii). Orthology between B. bovis and B. microti proteases was defined using a BLASTp bidirectional best hit (BBH) approach [93]. Paralogs within the B. microti genome were determined by BLASTp (blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 1 September 2021), considering a threshold E value of 0.05. Peptidase domain names and locations were obtained from the Conserved Domains database of the NCBI.
For those proteases included in the MEROPS database and predicted as active, the relevant amino acids of the catalytic site were identified using the data available at this website. For the proteases not included in the MEROPS database, alignments of B. bovis and B. microti orthologs were carried out by Clustal omega [94] (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/, accessed on 1 September 2021), and the relevant amino acids described for B. bovis in MEROPS were manually identified for the corresponding B. microti protease. The non-peptidase homologs included those described as such in the MEROPS database. In addition, the peptidases not present in MEROPS were listed as non-peptidase homologs whenever one or more of the catalytically relevant amino acid residues at the homologous positions were missing upon alignment with the sequence of an active proteinase homolog.
The presence of transcripts and translated proteins in the blood parasite stages was evaluated in PiroplasmaDB [95] (piroplasmadb.org/piro/app, accessed on 10.09.2021) and in the proteomic database provided in Reference [31], respectively. The subcellular location of each protease was evaluated by the presence of a signal peptide (SignalP 5.0 server, www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/, accessed on 10 September 2021) [96] and transmembrane domains [97] (TMHMM server, www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/, accessed on 10 September 2021) and using the localization predictor DeepLoc-1.0 [98] (www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/DeepLoc/, accessed on 10 September 2021) with the settings for eukaryotic sequences

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens10111457/s1, Table S1: M41 metalloprotease paralogue family of B. microti, Table S2: S59 paralogue family of B. microti, Table S3: Predicted subcellular localization of B. microti proteases, Table S4: Comparison between the repertoire of B. microti and B. bovis proteases predicted as active at least in one of either species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.F.-C. and L.S.; investigation: M.F.-C. and S.N.W.; original draft preparation: M.F.-C.; and writing—reviewing and editing: C.E.S., S.N.W., L.S., and M.F.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge the support of projects 2019-PD-E5-I102, 2019-PE-E5-I109, and 2019-PE-E5-I105 from the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA, Argentina) and CRIS 2090-32000-039-000-D from ARS-USDA (USA). SNW received a doctoral fellowship from Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET, Argentina).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Yang, Y.; Christie, J.; Köster, L.; Du, A.; Yao, C. Emerging Human Babesiosis with “Ground Zero” in North America. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vannier, E.; Krause, P.J. Human Babesiosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 2397–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Tołkacz, K.; Bednarska, M.; Alsarraf, M.; Dwużnik, D.; Grzybek, M.; Welc-Falęciak, R.; Behnke, J.M.; Bajer, A. Prevalence, Genetic Identity and Vertical Transmission of Babesia microti in Three Naturally Infected Species of Vole, Microtus Spp. (Cricetidae). Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tufts, D.M.; Diuk-Wasser, M.A. Transplacental Transmission of Tick-Borne Babesia microti in Its Natural Host Peromyscus Leucopus. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Iyer, S.; Goodman, K. Congenital Babesiosis From Maternal Exposure: A Case Report. J. Emerg. Med. 2019, 56, e39–e41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stanley, J.; Stramer, S.L.; Erickson, Y.; Cruz, J.; Gorlin, J.; Janzen, M.; Rossmann, S.N.; Straus, T.; Albrecht, P.; Pate, L.L.; et al. Detection of Babesia RNA and DNA in Whole Blood Samples from US Blood Donations. Transfusion 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Renard, I.; Ben Mamoun, C. Treatment of Human Babesiosis: Then and Now. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Krause, P.J.; Auwaerter, P.G.; Bannuru, R.R.; Branda, J.A.; Falck-Ytter, Y.T.; Lantos, P.M.; Lavergne, V.; Meissner, H.C.; Osani, M.C.; Rips, J.G.; et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA): 2020 Guideline on Diagnosis and Management of Babesiosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 72, e49–e64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wormser, G.P.; Prasad, A.; Neuhaus, E.; Joshi, S.; Nowakowski, J.; Nelson, J.; Mittleman, A.; Aguero-Rosenfeld, M.; Topal, J.; Krause, P.J. Emergence of Resistance to Azithromycin-Atovaquone in Immunocompromised Patients with Babesia microti Infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 50, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Simon, M.S.; Westblade, L.F.; Dziedziech, A.; Visone, J.E.; Furman, R.R.; Jenkins, S.G.; Schuetz, A.N.; Kirkman, L.A. Clinical and Molecular Evidence of Atovaquone and Azithromycin Resistance in Relapsed Babesia microti Infection Associated With Rituximab and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 65, 1222–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Florin-Christensen, M.; Schnittger, L. Piroplasmids and Ticks: A Long-Lasting Intimate Relationship. Front. Biosci. 2009, 14, 3064–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Antunes, S.; Rosa, C.; Couto, J.; Ferrolho, J.; Domingos, A. Deciphering Babesia-Vector Interactions. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Klemba, M.; Goldberg, D.E. Biological Roles of Proteases in Parasitic Protozoa. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2003, 71, 275–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cai, H.; Kuang, R.; Gu, J.; Wang, Y. Proteases in Malaria Parasites—A Phylogenomic Perspective. Curr. Genom. 2011, 12, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Lilburn, T.G.; Cai, H.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, Y. Protease-Associated Cellular Networks in Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Rosenthal, P.; Sijwali, P.; Singh, A.; Shenai, B. Cysteine Proteases of Malaria Parasites: Targets for Chemotherapy. Curr. Pharma. Des. 2002, 8, 1659–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, H.; Child, M.A.; Bogyo, M. Proteases as Regulators of Pathogenesis: Examples from the Apicomplexa. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Proteins Proteom. 2012, 1824, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Pandey, K.C. Centenary Celebrations Article: Cysteine proteases of human malaria parasites. J. Parasit. Dis. 2011, 35, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sedwick, C. Plasmepsin V, a Secret Weapon Against Malaria. PLoS Biol. 2014, 12, e1001898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, N.-Z.; Xu, Y.; Wang, M.; Petersen, E.; Chen, J.; Huang, S.-Y.; Zhu, X.-Q. Protective Efficacy of Two Novel DNA Vaccines Expressing Toxoplasma Gondii Rhomboid 4 and Rhomboid 5 Proteins against Acute and Chronic Toxoplasmosis in Mice. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2015, 14, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Okubo, K.; Yokoyama, N.; Govind, Y.; Alhassan, A.; Igarashi, I. Babesia bovis: Effects of Cysteine Protease Inhibitors on in vitro Growth. Exp. Parasitol. 2007, 117, 214–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. AbouLaila, M.; Nakamura, K.; Govind, Y.; Yokoyama, N.; Igarashi, I. Evaluation of the in Vitro Growth-Inhibitory Effect of Epoxomicin on Babesia Parasites. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 167, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Munkhjargal, T.; Ishizaki, T.; Guswanto, A.; Takemae, H.; Yokoyama, N.; Igarashi, I. Molecular and Biochemical Characterization of Methionine Aminopeptidase of Babesia bovis as a Potent Drug Target. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 221, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jalovecka, M.; Hartmann, D.; Miyamoto, Y.; Eckmann, L.; Hajdusek, O.; O’Donoghue, A.J.; Sojka, D. Validation of Babesia Proteasome as a Drug Target. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Res. 2018, 8, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Schwake, C.; Baldwin, M.R.; Bachovchin, W.; Hegde, S.; Schiemer, J.; Okure, C.; Levin, A.E.; Vannier, E.; Hanada, T.; Chishti, A.H. HIV Protease Inhibitors Block Parasite Signal Peptide Peptidases and Prevent Growth of Babesia microti Parasites in Erythrocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 517, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mesplet, M.; Palmer, G.H.; Pedroni, M.J.; Echaide, I.; Florin-Christensen, M.; Schnittger, L.; Lau, A.O.T. Genome-Wide Analysis of Peptidase Content and Expression in a Virulent and Attenuated Babesia bovis Strain Pair. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2011, 179, 111–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Schnittger, L.; Rodriguez, A.E.; Florin-Christensen, M.; Morrison, D.A. Babesia: A World Emerging. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2012, 12, 1788–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schnittger, L.; Ganzinelli, S.; Bhoora, R.; Omondi, D.; Nijhof, A.M.; Florin-Christensen, M. The Piroplasmida Babesia, Cytauxzoon, and Theileria in Farm and Companion Animals: Species Compilation, Molecular Phylogeny, and Evolutionary Insights. Parasitol. Res. 2021. under revision. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rawlings, N.D.; Bateman, A. How to Use the MEROPS Database and Website to Help Understand Peptidase Specificity. Protein Sci. 2021, 30, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Silva, J.C.; Cornillot, E.; McCracken, C.; Usmani-Brown, S.; Dwivedi, A.; Ifeonu, O.O.; Crabtree, J.; Gotia, H.T.; Virji, A.Z.; Reynes, C.; et al. Genome-Wide Diversity and Gene Expression Profiling of Babesia microti Isolates Identify Polymorphic Genes That Mediate Host-Pathogen Interactions. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Magni, R.; Luchini, A.; Liotta, L.; Molestina, R.E. Analysis of the Babesia microti proteome in infected red blood cells by a combination of nanotechnology and mass spectrometry. Int. J. Parasitol. 2019, 49, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Florin-Christensen, M.; Florin-Christensen, J.; Tiedtke, A.; Rasmussen, L. New aspects of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes in lower eukaryotes. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1989, 48, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  33. Binder, E.M.; Kim, K. Location, location, location: Trafficking and function of secreted proteases of Toxoplasma and Plasmodium. Traffic 2004, 5, 914–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Šnebergerová, P.; Bartošová-Sojková, P.; Jalovecká, M.; Sojka, D. Plasmepsin-like Aspartyl Proteases in Babesia. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, X.; Chen, H.; Bahamontes-Rosa, N.; Kun, J.F.J.; Traore, B.; Crompton, P.D.; Chishti, A.H. Plasmodium falciparum Signal Peptide Peptidase Is a Promising Drug Target against Blood Stage Malaria. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 380, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Gluzman, I.Y.; Francis, S.E.; Oksman, A.; Smith, C.E.; Duffin, K.L.; Goldberg, D.E. Order and Specificity of the Plasmodium falciparum Hemoglobin Degradation Pathway. J. Clin. Investig. 1994, 93, 1602–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Nasamu, A.S.; Polino, A.J.; Istvan, E.S.; Goldberg, D.E. Malaria Parasite Plasmepsins: More than Just Plain Old Degradative Pepsins. J. Biolog. Chem. 2020, 295, 8425–8441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cornillot, E.; Hadj-Kaddour, K.; Dassouli, A.; Noel, B.; Ranwez, V.; Vacherie, B.; Augagneur, Y.; Brès, V.; Duclos, A.; Randazzo, S.; et al. Sequencing of the Smallest Apicomplexan Genome from the Human Pathogen Babesia Microti. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 9102–9114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kim, K. Role of Proteases in Host Cell Invasion by Toxoplasma gondii and Other Apicomplexa. Acta Tropica 2004, 91, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cowman, A.F.; Crabb, B.S. Invasion of Red Blood Cells by Malaria Parasites. Cell 2006, 124, 755–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ettari, R.; Previti, S.; di Chio, C.; Zappalà, M. Falcipain-2 and Falcipain-3 Inhibitors as Promising Antimalarial Agents. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, 28, 3010–3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hanspal, M.; Dua, M.; Takakuwa, Y.; Chishti, A.H.; Mizuno, A. Plasmodium falciparum Cysteine Protease Falcipain-2 Cleaves Erythrocyte Membrane Skeletal Proteins at Late Stages of Parasite DevelopmentPresented in Part in Abstract Form at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Orlando, FL, 2001. Blood 2002, 100, 1048–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sijwali, P.S.; Rosenthal, P.J. Gene Disruption Confirms a Critical Role for the Cysteine Protease Falcipain-2 in Hemoglobin Hydrolysis by Plasmodium falciparum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 4384–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Mesplet, M.; Echaide, I.; Dominguez, M.; Mosqueda, J.J.; Suarez, C.E.; Schnittger, L.; Florin-Christensen, M. Bovipain-2, the falcipain-2 ortholog, is expressed in intraerythrocytic stages of the tick-transmitted hemoparasite Babesia bovis. Parasites Vectors 2010, 3, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Martins, T.M.; Gonçalves, L.M.D.; Capela, R.; Moreira, R.; do Rosário, V.E.; Domingos, A. Effect of Synthesized Inhibitors on Babesipain-1, a New Cysteine Protease from the Bovine Piroplasm Babesia bigemina. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2010, 57, 68–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Martins, T.M.; do Rosário, V.E.; Domingos, A. Expression and Characterization of the Babesia bigemina Cysteine Protease BbiCPL1. Acta Tropica 2012, 121, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Carletti, T.; Barreto, C.; Mesplet, M.; Mira, A.; Weir, W.; Shiels, B.; Oliva, A.G.; Schnittger, L.; Florin-Christensen, M. Characterization of a Papain-like Cysteine Protease Essential for the Survival of Babesia ovis Merozoites. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2016, 7, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lu, S.; Ascencio, M.E.; Torquato, R.J.S.; Florin-Christensen, M.; Tanaka, A.S. Kinetic Characterization of a Novel Cysteine Peptidase from the Protozoan Babesia bovis, a Potential Target for Drug Design. Biochimie 2020, 179, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wei, N.; Du, Y.; Lu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Cao, J.; Zhang, H.; Gong, H.; Zhou, J. A Cysteine Protease of Babesia microti and Its Interaction with Tick Cystatins. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 3013–3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, J.; Cao, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, H.; Gong, H.; Zhou, J. Evaluation on Infectivity of Babesia microti to Domestic Animals and Ticks Outside the Ixodes Genus. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lu, S.; da Rocha, L.A.; Torquato, R.J.S.; da Silva Vaz Junior, I.; Florin-Christensen, M.; Tanaka, A.S. A Novel Type 1 Cystatin Involved in the Regulation of Rhipicephalus microplus Midgut Cysteine Proteases. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ascencio, M.E.; Florin-Christensen, M.; Mamoun, C.B.; Weir, W.; Shiels, B.; Schnittger, L. Cysteine Proteinase C1A Paralog Profiles Correspond with Phylogenetic Lineages of Pathogenic Piroplasmids. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Dogga, S.K.; Soldati-Favre, D. Biology of Rhomboid Proteases in Infectious Diseases. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 60, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Düsterhöft, S.; Künzel, U.; Freeman, M. Rhomboid Proteases in Human Disease: Mechanisms and Future Prospects. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Res. 2017, 1864, 2200–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Dowse, T.J.; Soldati, D. Rhomboid-like Proteins in Apicomplexa: Phylogeny and Nomenclature. Trends Parasitol. 2005, 21, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Santos, J.M.; Graindorge, A.; Soldati-Favre, D. New Insights into Parasite Rhomboid Proteases. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2012, 182, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Lin, J.; Meireles, P.; Prudêncio, M.; Engelmann, S.; Annoura, T.; Sajid, M.; Chevalley-Maurel, S.; Ramesar, J.; Nahar, C.; Avramut, C.M.C.; et al. Loss-of-Function Analyses Defines Vital and Redundant Functions of the Plasmodium Rhomboid Protease Family. Mol. Microbiol. 2013, 88, 318–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Urban, S. Making the Cut: Central Roles of Intramembrane Proteolysis in Pathogenic Microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Gandhi, S.; Baker, R.P.; Cho, S.; Stanchev, S.; Strisovsky, K.; Urban, S. Designed Parasite-Selective Rhomboid Inhibitors Block Invasion and Clear Blood-Stage Malaria. Cell Chem. Biol. 2020, 27, 1410–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Han, Y.; Zhou, A.; Lu, G.; Zhao, G.; Wang, L.; Guo, J.; Song, P.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, H.; Cong, H.; et al. Protection via a ROM4 DNA Vaccine and Peptide against Toxoplasma gondii in BALB/c Mice. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Gallenti, R.; Poklepovich, T.; Florin-Christensen, M.; Schnittger, L. The Repertoire of Serine Rhomboid Proteases of Piroplasmids of Importance to Animal and Human Health. Int. J. Parasitol. 2021, 51, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lysyk, L.; Brassard, R.; Touret, N.; Lemieux, M.J. PARL Protease: A Glimpse at Intramembrane Proteolysis in the Inner Mitochondrial Membrane. J. Mol. Biol. 2020, 432, 5052–5062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Freeman, M. Proteolysis within the Membrane: Rhomboids Revealed. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ueti, M.W.; Johnson, W.C.; Kappmeyer, L.S.; Herndon, D.R.; Mousel, M.R.; Reif, K.E.; Taus, N.S.; Ifeonu, O.O.; Silva, J.C.; Suarez, C.E.; et al. Transcriptome Dataset of Babesia bovis Life Stages within Vertebrate and Invertebrate Hosts. Data Brief 2020, 33, 106533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wright, I.G.; Goodger, B.V.; Mahoney, D.F. Virulent and Avirulent Strains of Babesia bovis: The Relationship Between Parasite Protease Content and Pathophysiological Effect of the Strain. J. Protozool. 1981, 28, 118–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lowther, W.T.; Matthews, B.W. Structure and Function of the Methionine Aminopeptidases. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 2000, 1477, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Naughton, J.A.; Nasizadeh, S.; Bell, A. Downstream Effects of Haemoglobinase Inhibition in Plasmodium falciparum-Infected Erythrocytes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2010, 173, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Munkhjargal, T.; Yokoyama, N.; Igarashi, I. Recombinant Methionine Aminopeptidase Protein of Babesia microti: Immunobiochemical Characterization as a Vaccine Candidate against Human Babesiosis. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 3669–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ciechanover, A. The Ubiquitin-Proteasome Proteolytic Pathway. Cell 1994, 79, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bedford, L.; Paine, S.; Sheppard, P.W.; Mayer, R.J.; Roelofs, J. Assembly, Structure, and Function of the 26S Proteasome. Trends Cell Biol. 2010, 20, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Li, H.; Bogyo, M.; Fonseca, P.C.A. da The Cryo-EM Structure of the Plasmodium falciparum 20S Proteasome and Its Use in the Fight against Malaria. FEBS J. 2016, 283, 4238–4243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Bijlmakers, M.J. Ubiquitination and the Proteasome as Drug Targets in Trypanosomatid Diseases. Front. Chem. 2021, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Thomas, M.; Brand, S.; de Rycker, M.; Zuccotto, F.; Lukac, I.; Dodd, P.G.; Ko, E.-J.; Manthri, S.; McGonagle, K.; Osuna-Cabello, M.; et al. Scaffold-Hopping Strategy on a Series of Proteasome Inhibitors Led to a Preclinical Candidate for the Treatment of Visceral Leishmaniasis. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 5905–5930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kuhn, D.J.; Chen, Q.; Voorhees, P.M.; Strader, J.S.; Shenk, K.D.; Sun, C.M.; Demo, S.D.; Bennett, M.K.; van Leeuwen, F.W.B.; Chanan-Khan, A.A.; et al. Potent Activity of Carfilzomib, a Novel, Irreversible Inhibitor of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway, against Preclinical Models of Multiple Myeloma. Blood 2007, 110, 3281–3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Allred, D.R.; Carlton, J.M.R.; Satcher, R.L.; Long, J.A.; Brown, W.C.; Patterson, P.E.; O’Connor, R.M.; Stroup, S.E. The Ves Multigene Family of B. bovis Encodes Components of Rapid Antigenic Variation at the Infected Erythrocyte Surface. Mol. Cell 2000, 5, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ferreri, L.M.; Brayton, K.A.; Sondgeroth, K.S.; Lau, A.O.T.; Suarez, C.E.; McElwain, T.F. Expression and Strain Variation of the Novel “Small Open Reading Frame” (Smorf) Multigene Family in Babesia bovis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2012, 42, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Florin-Christensen, M.; Rodriguez, A.E.; Suárez, C.E.; Ueti, M.W.; Delgado, F.O.; Echaide, I.; Schnittger, L. N-Glycosylation in Piroplasmids: Diversity within Simplicity. Pathogens 2021, 10, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Montero, E.; Gonzalez, L.M.; Rodriguez, M.; Oksov, Y.; Blackman, M.J.; Lobo, C.A. A Conserved Subtilisin Protease Identified in Babesia divergens Merozoites. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 35717–35726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Harris, P.K.; Yeoh, S.; Dluzewski, A.R.; O’Donnell, R.A.; Withers-Martinez, C.; Hackett, F.; Bannister, L.H.; Mitchell, G.H.; Blackman, M.J. Molecular Identification of a Malaria Merozoite Surface Sheddase. PLoS Pathogens 2005, 1, e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Koussis, K.; Withers-Martinez, C.; Yeoh, S.; Child, M.; Hackett, F.; Knuepfer, E.; Juliano, L.; Woehlbier, U.; Bujard, H.; Blackman, M.J. A Multifunctional Serine Protease Primes the Malaria Parasite for Red Blood Cell Invasion. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 725–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Jalovecka, M.; Sojka, D.; Ascencio, M.; Schnittger, L. Babesia Life Cycle—When Phylogeny Meets Biology. Trends Parasitol. 2019, 35, 356–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Todd, A.E.; Orengo, C.A.; Thornton, J.M. Sequence and Structural Differences between Enzyme and Nonenzyme Homologs. Structure 2002, 10, 1435–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Reynolds, S.L.; Fischer, K. Pseudoproteases: Mechanisms and Function. Biochem. J. 2015, 468, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Agbowuro, A.A.; Huston, W.M.; Gamble, A.B.; Tyndall, J.D.A. Proteases and protease inhibitors in infectious diseases. Med. Care Res. Rev. 2018, 38, 1295–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fernández-Montero, J.V.; Barreiro, P.; Soriano, V. HIV protease inhibitors: Recent clinical trials and recommendations on use. Expert Opin. Pharm. 2009, 10, 1615–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Rowe, I.A.; Mutimer, D.J. Protease inhibitors for treatment of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection. The BMJ 2011, 343, d6972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mushtaq, M.; Naz, S.; Parang, K.; Ul-Haq, Z. Exploiting Dengue Virus Protease as a Therapeutic Target; Current Status, Challenges and Future Avenues. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Srivastava, K.; Singh, M.K. Drug repurposing in COVID-19: A review with past, present and future. Metab. Open 2021, 12, 100121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jaijyan, D.K.; Govindasamy, K.; Singh, J.; Bhattacharya, S.; Singh, A.P. Establishment of a stable transfection method in Babesia microti and identification of a novel bidirectional promoter of Babesia microti. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Liu, M.; Ji, S.; Rizk, M.A.; Adjou Moumouni, P.F.; Galon, E.M.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Zheng, W.; Benedicto, B.; Tumwebaze, M.A.; et al. Transient Transfection of the Zoonotic Parasite Babesia microti. Pathogens 2020, 9, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Pérez, B.; Antunes, S.; Gonçalves, L.M.; Domingos, A.; Gomes, J.R.; Gomes, P.; Teixeira, C. Toward the discovery of inhibitors of babesipain-1, a Babesia bigemina cysteine protease: In vitro evaluation, homology modeling and molecular docking studies. J. Comput. -Aided Mol. Des. 2013, 27, 823–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Yin, M.; Zhang, H.B.; Tao, Y.; Yao, J.M.; Liu, H.; Win, H.H.; Huo, L.L.; Jiang, B.; Chen, J.X. Optimization of an Evaluation Method for Anti-Babesia microti Drug Efficacy. Acta Tropica 2021, 225, 106179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tatusov, R.L.; Koonin, E.V.; Lipman, D.J. A Genomic Perspective on Protein Families. Science 1997, 278, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Sievers, F.; Higgins, D.G. Clustal Omega for Making Accurate Alignments of Many Protein Sequences. Protein Sci. 2018, 27, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Aurrecoechea, C.; Barreto, A.; Brestelli, J.; Brunk, B.P.; Cade, S.; Doherty, R.; Fischer, S.; Gajria, B.; Gao, X.; Gingle, A.; et al. EuPathDB: The Eukaryotic Pathogen Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D684–D691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Almagro Armenteros, J.J.; Tsirigos, K.D.; Sønderby, C.K.; Petersen, T.N.; Winther, O.; Brunak, S.; von Heijne, G.; Nielsen, H. SignalP 5.0 Improves Signal Peptide Predictions Using Deep Neural Networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 420–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Krogh, A.; Larsson, B.; von Heijne, G.; Sonnhammer, E.L.L. Predicting Transmembrane Protein Topology with a Hidden Markov Model: Application to Complete Genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Almagro Armenteros, J.J.; Sønderby, C.K.; Sønderby, S.K.; Nielsen, H.; Winther, O. DeepLoc: Prediction of Protein Subcellular Localization Using Deep Learning. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 3387–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Proteases belonging to the aspartic, cysteine, threonine, serine, and metallopeptidase types encoded by B. microti.
Table 1. Proteases belonging to the aspartic, cysteine, threonine, serine, and metallopeptidase types encoded by B. microti.
TypeFamilyProtein IdGenBank
Annotation
Gene LocusMEROPS AnnotationType and Position of
Peptidase Domain
Active Side Residues (Active Proteases)Transcriptomic/
Proteomic Data
Aspartic proteasesA1XP_021337483Cathepsin E-BBMR1_01G02485
BBM_I02485
MER1133958—subfamily A1A unassigned peptidasesPTZ00165
aspartyl protease
82-403
D110, Y158,
D307
T
XP_021337801Pepsin ABmR1_04g07350
BBM_III07350
MER0383113
MER1136315
subfamily A1A unassigned peptidases
cd05471
pepsin_like
109-417
D128, F173,
D324
T
XP_021338468Eukaryotic aspartyl proteaseBMR1_03g00915
BBM_III00915
MER1142805
MER0383316
subfamily A1A unassigned peptidases
cd05471
pepsin_like
133-473
D160, F205,
D373
T
XP_021338748Eukaryotic aspartyl proteaseBMR1_03g03850
BBM_III03850
MER0384385
subfamily A1A unassigned peptidases
PTZ00165
aspartyl protease
88-401
D106, Y160,
D310
T
XP_021337625Plasmepsin VBmR1_04g05270
BBM_III05270
MER0495838
subfamily A1B unassigned peptidases
cl11403 pepsin_retropepsin _like aspartate proteases
167-502
D198, Y253,
D388
T
A22BXP_021338622Signal peptide peptidaseBMR1_03g02475
BBM_III02475
MER0323102
subfamily A22B unassigned peptidases
cl01342 Peptidase_A22B Superfamily
27-225
D115, D156T
A28XP_021337501DNA damage-inducible protein 1BMR1_01G02675
BBM_I02675
MER0321004
subfamily A28A unassigned peptidases
cd05479
RP_DDI; retropepsin-like domain of DNA damage inducible protein
221-342
D231T
Cysteine proteasesC1AXP_021338611Cathepsin CBMR1_03g02385
BBM_III02385
MER0345528
Subfamily C1A unassigned peptidases
PTZ00049
cathepsin C-like protein
273-483
Q274, C280,
H44, D466
T
XP_012647584Cysteine proteinaseBMR1_01G02595
BBM_I02595
MER0701894
Non-peptidase homolog
PTZ00200
cysteine proteinase
296-475
InactiveT
XP_012650559Papain family cysteine proteaseBmR1_04g09925
BBM_III09925
MER0344826
subfamily C1A unassigned peptidases
cd02248 Peptidase_C1A
236-444
Q252, C258, H38, N410T/H
XP_012650562Papain family cysteine proteaseBmR1_04g09940
BBM_III09940
-cd02248 Peptidase_C1A
236-444
Q252, C258,
H38, N410
T
XP_012647628Papain family cysteine proteaseBMR1_01G02825
BBM_I02825
MER0345177 Unassigned peptidasePTZ00200
cysteine proteinase
324-538
Q342, C348,
H48, N503
T
C2XP_021337703Calpain family cysteine proteaseBmR1_04g06080
BBM_III06080
MER0348343
subfamily C2A unassigned peptidases
cl00051
CysPc Superfamily
72-354
Q96, C102, H293, N313T
C12XP_021337460ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L3BMR1_01G02185
BBM_I02185
MER0342930
MER1171398
family C12
non-peptidase homologs
cl08306
Peptidase_C12 Superfamily
8-224
InactiveT
C13XP_012650207GPI-anchored transamidaseBmR1_04g08080
BBM_III08080
MER0674277 glycosylphosphatidylinositol:protein transamidasecl00042
CASc Superfamily
391-639
H532, C574T
C14XP_012648342Caspase domainBMR1_02g02900
BBM_II02900
MER0393785
subfamily C14B unassigned peptidases
cl00042
CASc Superfamily
48-168
InactiveT
C19XP_012647713U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP-associated protein 2BMR1_01G03245
BBM_I03245
MER0711213
family C19 non-peptidase homologs
cd02669 Peptidase_C19M
158-365
InactiveT
XP_012649658Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25BmR1_04g05260
BBM_III05260
MER0706972
family C19 unassigned peptidases
cl37989
UCH Superfamily
839-1135
N842, C847,
H1084, D1105
T
XP_021338598Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolaseBMR1_03g02275
BBM_III02275
MER0713031
family C19 unassigned peptidases
cl02553
Peptidase_C19 Superfamily
85-383
N94, C100, H342, D358T
XP_012649978Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 14BmR1_04g06875
BBM_III06875
MER0346035
family C19 unassigned peptidases
cl02553
Peptidase_C19 Superfamily
80-479
N112, C117,
H399, D443
T
XP_012647380Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 7BMR1_01G01550
BBM_I01550
MER0714894
family C19 unassigned peptidases
cl02553
Peptidase_C19 Superfamily
379-510
InactiveT/M
XP_021337689Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolaseBmR1_04g05926
BBM_III05930
MER0710229
family C19 non-peptidase homologs
cl37989
Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase
InactiveT
XP_021338067Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 5/13BMR1_02g00955
BBM_II00955
MER0708474
family C19 unassigned peptidases
cl34941
UBP14 Superfamily
184-673
N315, C321, H751, N746T
C26XP_012647696CTP synthaseBMR1_01G03155
BBM_I03155
-cl33465
CTP synthase
4-570
C398, H540T
XP_021337469carbamoyl-phosphate synthase// aspartate carbamoyltransferaseBMR1_01G02285
BBM_I02285
-cl36884
CPSaseII_lrg Superfamily
459-1571
C334, H407T
C44XP_012650079glucosamine--fructose-6-phosphate aminotransferaseBmR1_04g07400
BBM_III07400
-cl36542
PTZ00295 super family
C40T
C48XP_012648199sentrin-specific protease 1BMR1_02g02160
BBM_II02160
MER0378492
family C48 unassigned peptidases
cl23802
Peptidase_C48 Superfamily
191-358
H279, D298, Q347, C353T
XP_021337449sentrin-specific protease 2BMR1_01G02005
BBM_I02005
MER0378539
family C48 unassigned peptidases
cl23802
Peptidase_C48 Superfamily
377-660
H453, D583,
Q642, C648
T
C54XP_021337321autophagy-related protein 4BMR1_01G00840
BBM_I00840
-cl04056
Peptidase family C54
34-256
Y32, C69,
D218, H220
T
C56XP_0126496374-methyl-5(b-hydroxyethyl)-thiazole monophosphate biosynthesisBmR1_04g05155
BBM_III05155
MER0385822
family C56 non-peptidase homologs
cl00020
GAT_1 superfamily
45′207
InactiveT/H
C78XP_021337753Peptidase family C78BmR1_04g06690
BBM_III06690
MER0393880
family C78 unassigned peptidases
cl06790
Peptidase family C78
486-677
Y498, C510, D634, H636T
C85AXP_021337245Ubiquitin thioesterase otu2BMR1_01G00165 BBM_I00165MER0743969
subfamily C85A unassigned peptidases
cl9932 OTU Superfamily OTU-like cysteine protease 65-186D65, C68, H185T
C86XP_021338227JosephinBMR1_02g02671
BBM_II02675
MER0399903
family C86 unassigned peptidases
cl20229
Josephin Superfamily
1-121
InactiveT
C97XP_021338702PPPDE putative peptidase domainBMR1_03g03275
BBM_III03275
MER0746696
family C97 unassigned peptidases
cl05462
Peptidase_C97
154-283
H193, C274T
C115XP_021337547Protein FAM63ABMR1_01G03140
BBM_I03140
MER0933699
family C115 homologs, unassigned
cl04510
MINDY_DUB
4-256
Q21, C27,
H 211
T
Threonine proteasesT1AXP_01264714020S proteasome subunit alpha 1BMR1_01G00290
BBM_I00290
MER1091683—subfamily T1A unassigned peptidasescd03754 proteasome_alpha_type_6
29-150
T38T/M
XP_01265048920S proteasome subunit alpha 2BmR1_04g09560
BBM_III09560
MER1089221—subfamily T1A unassigned peptidasescd03750 proteasome_alpha_type_2
61-224
T62T
XP_02133774620S proteasome subunit alpha 3BmR1_04g06615
BBM_III06615
MER1088544—subfamily T1A unassigned peptidasesPTZ00246 proteasome subunits alpha
32-188
T33T
XP_02133774520S proteasome subunit alpha 4BmR1_04g06610
BBM_III06610
-cl00467
proteasome_alpha_type_7
3-209
T32T
XP_01264960420S proteasome subunit alpha 5BmR1_04g04985 BBM_III04985MER1363164—subfamily T1A
Non-peptidase homologs
Cd03753
proteasome_alpha_type_5
35-204
InactiveT
XP_01265008520S proteasome subunit alpha 6BmR1_04g07427
BBM_III07427
MER1089259—subfamily T1A unassigned peptidasescd03749 proteasome_alpha_type_1
36-205
T33T
XP_02133865620S proteasome subunit alpha 7BMR1_03g02775
BBM_III02775
-cl00467
Ntn_hydrolase Superfamily
6-214
Inactive?T
XP_01264831520S proteasome subunit beta 1BMR1_02g02760
BBM_II02760
-cl00467
Ntn_hydrolase Superfamily
29-268
T31T
XP_01264945320S proteasome subunit beta 2BMR1_03g04210
BBM_III04210
MER0378485—proteasome subunit beta2Cd03763
Proteasome_beta_type_7
73-254
T73T
XP_01264987320S proteasome subunit beta 3BmR1_04g06340
BBM_III06340
MER0376976—proteasome subunit beta 3cd03759 proteasome_beta_type_3
5-191
Inactive?T
XP_01264785720S proteasome subunit beta 4BMR1_02g00410
BBM_II00410
-Cd03758
proteasome_beta_type_2
1-152
Inactive?T/M
XP_02133877720S proteasome subunit beta 5BMR1_03g04170
BBM_III04170
MER0376387—subfamily T1A unassigned peptidasescd03761 proteasome_beta_type_5
24-226
T28T
XP_01265032220S proteasome subunit beta 6BmR1_04g08685 BBM_III08685MER1090686—subfamily T1A unassigned peptidasescl00467
Ntn_hydrolase Superfamily
13-197
T13T
XP_02133741920S proteasome subunit beta 7BMR1_01G01780
BBM_I01780
MER1088514—subfamily T1A non-peptidase homologscl00467
Ntn_hydrolase Superfamily
11-150
InactiveT
Metallo proteasesM01XP_012648031aminopeptidase NBMR1_02g01305
BBM_II01305
MER0335312—M1 aminopeptidasePRK14015 pepN aminopeptidase N
366-533
E423, Y506 metal ligand(s): H422, H426,
E445
T/M
M3AXP_021338435Mitochondrial
intermediate
peptidase
BMR1_03g00560
BBM_III00560
MER0817287—family M3 unassigned peptidasescl14813 GluZincin Superfamily Gluzin Peptidase family 49-519E482
metal ligand(s): H481, H485,
E510
T/M
M16BXP_021338255Probable zinc
protease PqqL
BMR1_02g02935
BBM_II02935
MER0925233—subfamily M16A unassigned peptidasesCOG0612 PqqL Predicted Zn-dependent peptidase 14-164E40, E116
metal ligand(s): H37, H41, E123
T
XP_021337876Mitochondrial processing peptidaseBmR1_04g08505
BBM_III08505
MER0392117—subfamily M16B non-peptidase homologsCOG0612 PqqL Predicted Zn-dependent peptidase 51-251InactiveT/H
XP_021338005Mitochondrial processing peptidaseBMR1_02g00260
BBM_II00260
MER0391438–
MER0764852
mitochondrial processing peptidase beta-subunit
COG0612 PqqL Predicted Zn-dependent peptidase
49-253
E90, E160
metal ligand(s): H87, H91, E167
T/H
M16CXP_012650528peptidase M16 inactive domain containingBmR1_04g09765 BBM_III09765MER0393094—subfamily M16C unassigned peptidasesPTZ00432 falcilysin 78-550E89, E164
metal ligand(s): H86, H90, E203
T
XP_021338727Uncharacterized protein C05D11.1BMR1_03g03610
BBM_III03610
MER0393111—subfamily M16C non-peptidase homologsCOG1026 Cym1 Zn-dependent peptidase, M16 family
54-450
InactiveT
M17XP_021338349leucyl aminopeptidaseBMR1_02g03960
BBM_II03960
MER0340008—family M17 unassigned peptidasesPRK00913 multifunctional aminopeptidase a154-499K300,R376 metal ligand(s): A288, D293, D312, H372, Q374T/H
M18XP_021338536aminopeptidaseBMR1_03g01710
BBM_III01710
MER0340957–
MER1122391
aspartyl aminopeptidase
cl14876 Zinc_peptidase_like_Superfamily
12-481
D95, E296
metal ligand(s): H93, D255, E297, D355, H449
T/H
M24AXP_021337644methionyl aminopeptidaseBmR1_04g05525
BBM_III05525
-PTZ00053 methionine aminopetidase 2
9-447
H199
metal ligand(s):
D230, H299,
E332,E427
T
XP_021337770methionyl aminopeptidaseBmR1_04g06870
BBM_III06870
MER0394794—methionyl aminopeptidase 1cd1086 MetAP1 Methionine Aminopeptidase
70-312
H143
metal ligand(s): D160, D171,
H234, E267,H298
T
XP_021337427methionyl aminopeptidaseBMR1_01G01855
BBM_I01855
MER0395783—subfamily M24A unassigned peptidasescd1086 MetAP1 Methionine Aminopeptidase
146-514
H219
metal ligand(s): D243, D254,
H423, E455, E486
T
XP_012649271methionyl aminopeptidaseBMR1_03g03300
BBM_III03300
MER0394867—methionyl aminopeptidase 1PLN03158 methionine aminopeptidase
105-356
H179
metal ligand(s): D196, D207,
H270, E303, E334
T
M24BXP_012650004Xaa-Pro aminopeptidaseBmR1_04g07005
BBM_III07005
-cd01066
X-Prolyl Aminopeptidase
H382,H468,H491
metal ligand(s):
D401, D412, H472, E509, E523
T
M41 *XP_021338270Peptidase family M41BMR1_02g03060
BBM_II03060
MER0363780—PF14_0616 g.p.TIGR01241 FtsH_fam ATP-dependent metalloprotease FtsH
431-647
E482
metal ligand(s): H481, H485, D558
T/H
XP_021338301AFG3 family proteinBMR1_02g03370
BBM_II03370
MER0363828—family M41 unassigned peptidasesTIGR01241 FtsH_fam ATP-dependent metalloprotease FtsH 461-682E515
metal ligand(s): H514, H518, D581
T/H
XP_012648901ATPase family associated with various cellular activitiesBMR1_03g01455 BBM_III01455MER0362824—family M41 unassigned peptidasesTIGR01241 FtsH_fam ATP-dependent metalloprotease FtsH 355-575E406
metal ligand(s): H405, H409, D484
T
M48AXP_012650086STE24 endopeptidaseBmR1_04g07429
BBM_III07429
MER0347520—subfamily M48A unassigned peptidasescd07343 M48A_Zmpste24p_lilke Peptidase M48 subfamily A
170-441
E304
metal ligand(s): H303, H307, E382
T/H
M67XP_02133857726S proteasome regulatory subunit N11BMR1_03g02055
BBM_III02055
MER0393303—subfamily M67A unassigned peptidasescd08069 MPN_RPN11_CSN5 Mov34/MPN/PAD-1 family proteasomal regulatory protein Rpn11 and signalosome complex subunits CSN5
25-314
E52
metal ligand(s): S113, P115, D126
T
Serine proteasesS1BXP_021338066Protease Do-like 9BMR1_02g00945
BBM_II00945
MER0960997—subfamily S1B unassigned peptidasesPfam13365Trypsin_2
78-230
H93, D124, S202T
S09XP_021337263hypothetical proteinBMR1_01G00280
BBM_I00280
-cl34357
Protease II
105-542
S536, D592, H628T
XP_012649807Alpha/beta hydrolase domain-containing protein 17CBmR1_04g06005
BBM_III06005
-cl27027
Fermentation-respiration switch protein FrsA, has esterase activity, DUF1100 family
102-312
S179, D260, H292T
XP_021338600alpha/beta hydrolase, putativeBMR1_03g02286
BBM_III2290
-Fermentation-respiration switch protein FrsA, has esterase activity, DUF1100 family
120-256
S142, D194, H246T
XP_012650025alpha/beta hydrolase domain-containing protein 17BBmR1_04g07110 BBM_III07110-cl27027 Fermentation-respiration switch protein FrsA, has esterase activity, DUF1100 family
35-220
S125, D189, H217T
S12XP_012649063aarF domain-containing kinaseBMR1_03g02265
BBM_III02265
MER1005027—family S12 non-peptidase homologscl21491
Transpeptidase superfamily
554-737
InactiveT
S14XP_012648206ATP-dependent Clp protease, protease subunitBMR1_02g02195 BBM_II02195MER0359175—family S14 unassigned peptidasesCd07017 S14_ClpP_2 Caseinolytic protease (ClpP)
41-228
S135, H160, D209T
XP_021337686Clp proteaseBmR1_04g05887
BBM_III05890
MER0359717
family S14 non-peptidase homologs
cd07017
caseinolytic protease (ClpP)
50-227
InactiveT
S16XP_012649081Lon protease homolog 1 mitochondrialBMR1_03g02350
BBM_III02350
MER0361396—family S16 unassigned peptidasescl36736
Ion endopeptidase La
835-1038
S946, K989T/H
S26XP_021338290mitochondrial inner membrane protease subunit 1BMR1_02g03240
BBM_II03240
MER1047726—subfamily S26A non-peptidase homologsCd06530 S26_SPase_I
64-102
InactiveT
XP_012650493signal peptidase, endoplasmic reticulum-typeBmR1_04g09580
BBM_III09580
MER0334095—signalase (animal) 21 kDa componentcl10465 Peptidase_S24_S26 Superfamily
52-169
S63, H101T/M
S33XP_012648716cardiolipin-specific phospholipaseBMR1_03g00525
BBM_III00525
-cl21494 Abhydrolase_1
98-327
S172, D292, H350T
S54XP_021338360Rhomboid-like protease 6BMR1_02g04085
BBM_II04085
MER1084044—family S54 unassigned peptidasescl21536
Rhomboid Superfamily
363-474
S391, H452T
XP_021338239ROM4BMR1_02g02777
BBM_II02780
MER0374041—family S54 unassigned peptidasescl21536
Rhomboid Superfamily
177-339
S270, H322T
XP_021338238ROM3 (a)BMR1_02g02776
BBM_II02775
-c21536
Rhomboid Superfamily
205-337
S273, H325T
XP_012650510hypothetical protein BmR1_04g09675 (b)BmR1_04g09675
BBM_III09675
MER1083102—family S54 non-peptidase homologscl21536
Rhomboid Superfamily
139-357
S287, H342T
XP_021338098hypothetical protein BMR1_02g01230 (c)BMR1_02g01230
BBM_II01230
-cl21536
Rhomboid Superfamily
267-458
InactiveT
XP_012647608Der1-like familyBMR1_01G02725
BBM_I02725
-cl21536
Rhomboid Superfamily
11-202
InactiveT
XP_012650093Der1-like familyBmR1_04g07462
BBM_III07462
-cl21536
Rhomboid Superfamily
87-295
InactiveT/H
XP_012649979Derlin 2/3BmR1_04g06880
BBM_III06880
-cl21536
Rhomboid Superfamily
12-205
InactiveT
S59 *XP_012650001Nucleoporin autopeptidaseBmR1_04g06990
BBM_III06990
MER1071845—family S59 non-peptidase homologspfam04096 Nucleoporin2
444-579
InactiveT
Protease types are color-coded: blue: aspartic, light yellow: cysteine, orange: threonine, gray: metallo, and yellow: serine proteases, with darker colors for peptidases predicted as active. The relevant amino acid positions in the active site needed for catalytic activity are included for each active protease. Inactive proteases have a predicted protease domain but lack one or more of the functional amino acids. Paralog groups within each family are underlined. When more than a paralog group is present in a family, different underlining styles are used for each group. (a) ROM4, (b) ROM7 (active protease, wrongly predicted as inactive in MEROPS), and (c) ROM8 [29]. (*) Paralogs of the M41 and the S59 families lacking peptidase domains are shown separately (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). T: Transcribed genes in the intraerythrocytic stage [30]. H or M: High or medium levels of protein expression detected in Reference [31].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Florin-Christensen, M.; Wieser, S.N.; Suarez, C.E.; Schnittger, L. In Silico Survey and Characterization of Babesia microti Functional and Non-Functional Proteases. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111457

AMA Style

Florin-Christensen M, Wieser SN, Suarez CE, Schnittger L. In Silico Survey and Characterization of Babesia microti Functional and Non-Functional Proteases. Pathogens. 2021; 10(11):1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111457

Chicago/Turabian Style

Florin-Christensen, Monica, Sarah N. Wieser, Carlos E. Suarez, and Leonhard Schnittger. 2021. "In Silico Survey and Characterization of Babesia microti Functional and Non-Functional Proteases" Pathogens 10, no. 11: 1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111457

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop