Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Pinnipeds under Human Care and in Wild Pinnipeds
by
, , and
Micaela Martins
1, 
Nuno Urbani
1
,
Carla Flanagan
1,
Ursula Siebert
2,
Stephanie Gross
2,
Jitender P. Dubey
3,
Luís Cardoso
4,* and
Ana Patrícia Lopes
4 1
Zoomarine Portugal, 8201-864 Guia, Portugal
2
Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 25761 Buesum, Germany
3
Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
4
Department of Veterinary Sciences and Animal and Veterinary Research Centre (CECAV), School of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(11), 1415; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111415
Submission received: 30 September 2021
/
Revised: 20 October 2021
/
Accepted: 28 October 2021
/
Published: 31 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toxoplasma)
Abstract
:Toxoplasma gondii infection has been reported in numerous species of marine mammals, some of them with fatal consequences. A serosurvey for T. gondii infection was conducted in pinnipeds from an oceanographic park in Portugal (n = 60); stranded pinnipeds on the Portuguese coast (n = 10); and pinnipeds captured in Lorenzensplate, Germany (n = 99). Sera from 169 pinnipeds were tested for the presence of antibodies to T. gondii by the modified agglutination test with a cut-off titre of 25. An overall seroprevalence of 8.9% (95% confidence interval: 5.1–14.2) was observed. Antibody titres of 25, 50, 100, 1600 and ≥3200 were found in five (33.3%), two (13.3%), five (33.3%), one (6.7%) and two (13.3%) animals, respectively. Pinnipeds under human care had a seroprevalence of 20.0% (12/60), in contrast to 2.8% (3/109) in wild pinnipeds (p < 0.001). General results suggest a low exposure of wild pinnipeds to T. gondii, while the seroprevalence found in pinnipeds under human care highlights the importance of carrying out further studies. This is the first serological survey of T. gondii in pinnipeds in Portugal and the first infection report in South African fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus).
1. Introduction
Toxoplasmosis is a worldwide zoonosis caused by the obligate intracellular parasite Toxoplasma gondii, which affects a wide range of homeothermic animals, including marine mammals. Despite the existence of several identified transmission routes, the exact mode of T. gondii transmission to marine mammals remains unknown [1]. The presence of felids, the definitive hosts, in nearshore environments can result in contamination of coastal habitats, because they are the only hosts that can excrete through their faeces, the environmentally resistant stages, the oocyst of T. gondii. Some sources of oocyst contamination include freshwater outflows to the sea, surface runoffs and litter from domestic cats flushed down toilets [1,2]. The ingestion of sporulated oocysts in marine environment, either directly or indirectly, is considered the main source of infection, in addition to ingestion of oocysts directly from marine waters or consumption of paratenic hosts (such as molluscs) that have concentrated the oocysts [3]. While T. gondii does not multiply in poikilothermic animals, bivalve molluscs, sardines and anchovies can assimilate and concentrate oocysts [4,5,6,7]. The consumption of infected birds flying over marine waters is another possible route of transmission [8]. Transplacental T. gondii transmission, although rare in pinnipeds, has been documented. Systemic toxoplasmosis was confirmed in a full-term stillborn Hawaiian monk seal (Neomonachus schauinslandi) pup and in aborted California sea lion foetuses (Zalophus californianus) [9,10]. Certain marine mammals, such as seals, also serve as food for humans [11]. Thus, T. gondii infections in marine mammals under human care and wild marine mammals are of clinical and public health importance [12]. Additionally, marine mammals are considered as sentinels of T. gondii contamination of the marine environment [1,11].
While numerous serological studies have been performed to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies to T. gondii in pinnipeds worldwide [13], to the best of our knowledge, there are no published reports of T. gondii infection in pinnipeds in Portugal. The purpose of this study was to perform a serological study on T. gondii infection in pinnipeds from the zoological collection of an oceanographic park (Zoomarine Portugal), as well as in pinnipeds stranded on the Portuguese coast and then rehabilitated at a rehabilitation centre for marine species (Porto d’Abrigo, Zoomarine Portugal), and in pinnipeds captured shortly for health assessment in Lorenzensplate, Wadden Sea, Germany.
2. Results
Antibodies to T. gondii were found in 15 (8.9%) of the 169 pinnipeds (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.1–14.2) (Table 1). Titres of 25, 50, 100, 1600 and ≥3200 were found in five (33.3%), two (13.3%), five (33.3%), one (6.7%) and two (13.3%) of the seropositive animals, respectively. Antibodies to T. gondii were detected in five of the eight (62.5%) species tested, namely: Harbor seal (Phoca vitulina), California sea lion, South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens), South African fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus) and hooded seal (Cystophora cristata).
Table 2 presents the seroprevalence of T. gondii in pinnipeds according to the independent variables studied. A significantly different seroprevalence (p < 0.001) was observed in pinnipeds under human care (12/60, 20.0%) compared with wild pinnipeds (3/109, 2.8%). In addition, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) in frequencies of antibodies between otariids (10/37, 27.0%) and phocids (5/132, 3.8%). Concerning diet, pinnipeds fed fresh and frozen fish had lower seropositivity (3/109, 2.8%) than pinnipeds fed only frozen fish (12/60, 20.0%) (p < 0.001).
The prevalence of antibodies to T. gondii was significantly different (p = 0.043) in pinnipeds under human care with clinical signs (4/8, 50.0%) compared with apparently healthy animals (8/52, 15.4%). On the other hand, the seroprevalence of T. gondii infection did not vary significantly in pinnipeds with respect to family (p = 0.107), sex (p = 0.508), age (p = 1.0), birthplace (p = 0.670), presence of felids around habitats, gestation (p = 0.340) and abortion (p = 1.0).
With respect to paired samples, i.e., from the same individual, there were 11 out of the 12 seropositive pinnipeds under human care: Six were seropositive for both samples and five seronegative in the oldest sample (Table 3).
In wild pinnipeds, statistically significant differences were not detected between the prevalence of infection and sex (p = 1.0), age (p = 0.421) and clinical status (p = 1.0).
3. Discussion
In the present study, the overall T. gondii seroprevalence (8.9%) was lower than in surveys elsewhere [11]. In the present study, most frequently observed titres in seropositive pinnipeds were low (titres of 25 and 100). These results are in agreement with other studies carried out in pinnipeds with the MAT [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
The prevalence of antibodies to T. gondii detected in pinnipeds under human care was higher (20.0%) and significantly different from the one obtained in wild pinnipeds (2.8%), which may be explained by several factors, including the increased potential sources of infection in pinnipeds under human care. A likely source of infection is contamination of pool’s water source with sporulated oocysts, because there is a stray cat colony in the park, although managed through a veterinary care program that includes identification, vaccination, deworming and sterilization. In addition to direct exposure of water pool to feline faeces, pinnipeds could also be exposed to the oocysts mechanically transported through the trainer’s clothing or boots or even attending veterinarian, despite the use of specific footwear in areas where the animals are housed. The disinfection of swimming pool water in Zoomarine is carried out using chlorine and ozone treatments, but chlorination treatments (100 mg/L for 24 h) and ozone (6 mg/L for 12 min or 9.4 mg/L for 20 min) [22,23] may not destroy T. gondii oocysts [1]. As stated earlier, the ingestion of small birds with tissue cysts of T. gondii as a source of infection in seropositive animals cannot be ruled out. Arthropods and rodents may serve as mechanical vectors of T. gondii, but pest control is carried out regularly. The seroprevalence found in pinnipeds under human care in the present study (20.0%) was similar to the one found in South American sea lions from different Spanish zoological collections (1/8, 12.5%) [21] but considerably lower compared with the 50.0% (2/4) observed in California sea lions housed in a facility in Mexico [18] and the 72.7% (8/11) found in harbor seals from different Spain zoos [21].
The seroprevalence in wild animals reported in the present study suggests a low frequency of exposure to T. gondii. Comparatively, antibodies to T. gondii were not detected in any of the 120 harbor seals captured in Svalbard, Norway [24], neither in any of the 116 harbor seals in Glacier Bay and Kodiak Island, Alaska [25]. In north-eastern Atlantic harbor seals from the United Kingdom, a seroprevalence of 5.4% was reported [16]. Contrary to the results obtained in this study, substantially higher seroprevalences were reported in other investigations that also used the MAT, namely, in harbor seals from the Canadian Arctic (22.2%) [17] and the Scottish coast of the North Sea (29.0%) [26]. In grey seals, considerably higher seroprevalence was also reported, particularly from the Scottish coast of the North Sea (25.0%) and the Atlantic Ocean (40.0%) [26]. Despite the low seroprevalence obtained in the present study, the results indicate natural exposure to T. gondii in wild pinnipeds. These results may be explained by the low temperature of the waters that the seals included in this study inhabit, namely, the Wadden Sea and the North Atlantic Ocean, which may limit the survival of the oocysts [24]. Since the proximity to freshwater outflows to the sea is considered a risk factor [27], the seroprevalence found can be justified by poor contaminated near-shore environment. In addition, there may be different modes of transmission among species or different rates of exposure to the parasite, as some of the species, such as the hooded seal, perform seasonal migrations or extensive natural dispersal movements to southern waters, as far as Portugal, being exposed to hotter water currents [28].
Because among marine mammals, otariids spend more time on land than phocids, given the anatomical particularities that distinguish them [29], it is expected that the probability of exposure to the parasite will increase in individuals of the Otariidae family, because the permanency in a terrestrial environment, potentially contaminated with sporulated oocysts, is higher. Investigations in otariids are limited and seroprevalence varies depending on the species and the serological method used. For example, a 29.6% seroprevalence was found in 27 wild California sea lions from the coastal waters of southeast Alaska to the Bering Strait [14], using a cut-off MAT titre of 25. However, other studies report seroprevalences considerably lower. In Antarctic fur seals, only 2.4% (4/165) of the individuals were seropositive, also by using the MAT and a cut-off of 25 [19]. Similarly, only 2.5% of 1630 California sea lions had antibodies to T. gondii by indirect fluorescent antibody test (Carlson-Bremer et al., 2015). In New Zealand sea lions, only 6.0% (3/50) of the animals sampled were positive by latex agglutination test, using a cut-off titre of 32 [30].
The results obtained in phocids in the present study are in agreement with studies carried out in wild grey seals (5.8%) from France [31] and in Hawaiian monk seals (2.0%) [32]. In Japan, the observed seroprevalence in harbor seals was 4.0% (3/77) [33]. On the contrary, higher seroprevalences were found in Caspian seals in Iran (83.0%) [20] and in Antarctic Weddell seals (51.5%) [34]. In all of the investigations mentioned, the MAT was used as the serological test.
Concerning diet, and contrary to our expectations, a higher seroprevalence was observed in individuals fed exclusively on frozen fish. Considering that Zoomarine’s pinniped collection diet is based on thawed fish, previously frozen and stored at −20 °C for at least 21 days, it would be expected that the seroprevalence would be lower in these animals. However, it is important to remember that oocysts can survive freezing [1].
The higher seroprevalence obtained in pinnipeds under human care with clinical signs compared to that obtained in apparently healthy pinnipeds suggest that immunocompromised animals or animals with concomitant infections may be more prone to infection but serologic findings are only an aid to diagnosis of clinical toxoplasmosis [1].
Of the 60 pinnipeds under human care included in this study, antibodies to T. gondii were found in two harbor seals, two California sea lions, four South American sea lions and four South African fur seals. It should be noted that the lowest titre (i.e., 25), was found in harbor seals and California sea lions, while South African fur seals had the highest titres (i.e., 1600 and ≥3200). To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to report the presence of antibodies to T. gondii in South African fur seals. While seropositive South African fur seal with the highest titre (≥3200) had occasional clinical signs such as coughing, diarrhea and aggressiveness since its arrival at Zoomarine, some of which are observed in marine mammals with toxoplasmosis [3], antibodies are only an indicator of infection.
Regarding paired samples, of 11 out of the 12 seropositive pinnipeds under human care, six were seropositive in both samples and five were seronegative in the oldest sample. These results suggest that in six animals the primary infection occurred in a place other than Zoomarine. However, the samples were not collected immediately after the animals entered the park and therefore it cannot be assumed that the infection did not happen at Zoomarine. On the contrary, five of those 11 seropositive animals tested negative in the old samples, suggesting that the infection occurred at Zoomarine. Of the 5 animals mentioned, one was the only seropositive pinniped born at Zoomarine. This pup probably acquired infection post-natally because its dam tested negative by MAT (data not shown). Additionally, vertical transmission of T. gondii in marine mammals is not frequent [24,33,35,36].
With respect to the antibody titre obtained in old and recent samples, we found that in three animals the titre decreased, in two it remained identical and in one it increased. The decrease in antibody titres in three animals over time is in agreement with the hypothesis that in general titres decrease over time [37]. In the remaining animals, the maintenance and even the increase of titres are suggestive of reinfection or continuous exposure to the agent [38].
The seropositive wild pinnipeds included two harbor seals (titres of 50 and ≥3200) captured in Lorenzensplate and one hooded seal (titre of 25) stranded on the south coast of Portugal. While the three species sampled have different eating habits, which may contribute to different exposure to the parasite, the results obtained may reflect permanency in contaminated coastal areas. Grey seals and hooded seals are species that spend more time out at sea, unlike e.g. harbor seals, thus reducing the likelihood of exposure to oocysts shed in coastal regions [16]. The observed differences between species may therefore be associated with lower exposure to the parasite in grey seals, especially if coastal oocyst runoff is considered the main source of exposure [2,16]. Since the susceptibility of pinniped species to infection by T. gondii is unknown, the natural resistance to this parasite may also explain the low seroprevalences obtained [9].
Because there are no drugs that eliminate T. gondii infection and the lack of a protective vaccine, prevention of infection by T. gondii acquires special importance, particularly in animals under human care. Hygiene measures, such as washing hands of trainers and veterinarians before and after contact with pinnipeds, as well as before and after handling fish, might reduce T. gondii transmission. Cats should not be allowed in or near the holding facility of marine mammals, and other agents such as arthropods that can constitute a means of dissemination of oocysts should be controlled.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Animals and Samples
In the present study, a total of 169 pinnipeds were tested, among which 60 were pinnipeds under human care and 109 were wild individuals (Table 4).
Convenience-based sampling resulted in the collection of samples of seven different pinniped species from Mundo Aquático SA—Zoomarine Portugal, an oceanographic theme park located in the Algarve, south of mainland Portugal (Figure 1). The samples were collected between 1999 and 2020 during clinical procedures, with the vast majority of them having been obtained in the scope of a veterinary preventive medicine program. Additionally, and for some pinnipeds, it was possible to obtain a second sample, namely, the oldest sample, available in Zoomarine’s serum bank, obtained soon after birth or the arrival of the animals. This complementary assessment was made to determine in the seropositive animals whether the infection occurred at Zoomarine or elsewhere. Overall, the time window between the oldest and most recent sample ranged between 1 and 4 years.
Wild pinniped samples included hooded and grey seals stranded on the Portuguese coast, between 2001 and 2014, and were obtained after the animals had been admitted to Porto d’Abrigo—the Rehabilitation Centre for Marine Species of Zoomarine Portugal. Samples from harbor seals captured in Lorenzensplate, in the Wadden Sea, Germany (Figure 1) were also analysed. The samples were collected as part of the annual health monitoring program of the harbor seal population in the Wadden Sea of Schleswig-Holstein, between September 2014 and October 2019. The program is carried out by the Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research, part of the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Germany. For sample collection, the animals had been randomly selected. All animals were weight, measured, microchipped for tracking purposes, thus ensuring that no animal was sampled more than once, and subsequently released.
In otariids, the blood was collected from the interdigital veins of the pelvic flippers with a 23 G butterfly catheter. In phocids, blood was collected from the extradural vein with 20 G needles or hind flippers (for details see [40]). In both cases, the collected blood was placed in dry tubes and subsequently centrifuged at 1500× g for 5 min. After separation, the serum of each sample was transferred to properly identified tubes and was then stored at −20 °C until analysis.
Whenever possible, epidemiological data were collected for each animal, namely: Sampling date, provenance (under human care/wild), family (Otariidae/Phocidae), species, sex (female/male), age (subadult/adult), diet (fresh and/or frozen fish/frozen fish), clinical status at the time of blood collection (apparently healthy/clinically sick), birthplace (Zoomarine/other location), presence of felids around habitats (absent/present), pregnancy (non-pregnant/pregnant) and abortion (none miscarriage/≥1 miscarriage). Data on the control of arthropods and rodents were also recorded. Clinical manifestations included gastrointestinal (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain), respiratory (dyspnoea, cough, wheezing) or neurological (ataxia, seizures) signs.
4.2. Serological Examination
Serum samples were tested for specific IgG antibodies to T. gondii with a MAT commercial kit (Toxo-Screen DA®, bioMérieux, Lyon, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sera were assayed at a two-fold serial dilution from 1:25 to 1:3200. Positive and negative controls were supplied with the kit and included in each testing plate.
The results obtained were expressed as an antibody titre, i.e., the reciprocal of the highest dilution at which agglutination (at least half the well’s diameter) was still visible after 5–18 h incubation at room temperature. A cut-off titre of 25 was chosen based on previous studies on pinnipeds [14,16,18,19,20]. Due to its sensitivity and specificity, the MAT is considered the most useful serological test in detecting antibodies to T. gondii in animals [1]. The commercial test used in the present study has proven its usefulness in detecting antibodies to T. gondii in experimentally [41] and naturally infected pinnipeds [17,24,26,34]. Besides that, this serological method does not require species-specific conjugates and specialized equipment [42,43].
4.3. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS 26.0 program for Windows. Association between the prevalence of antibodies to T. gondii and explanatory variables (provenance, family, sex, age, diet, clinical status, birthplace, presence of felids, gestation and abortion) were analysed using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. The exact binomial test was used to calculate CI for the proportions, with a 95% confidence level. A p < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, the results of the present study document that pinnipeds under human care and wild pinnipeds in Portugal are exposed to T. gondii. It is noteworthy that infection in captive animals was higher than in wild animals, probably related to exposure to waters contaminated with oocysts excreted by cats. Prevention of access of felids to the enclosure where pinnipeds are housed and contiguous areas, efficient rodent and arthropod control programs, a diet based on previously frozen thawed fish and the use of proper hygiene practices are some of the measures that can minimize the risk of exposure to this parasite.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.M. and A.P.L.; methodology, M.M., A.P.L. and L.C.; software, L.C.; validation, M.M.; formal analysis, J.P.D. and L.C.; investigation, M.M.; resources, M.M., A.P.L., N.U., C.F., U.S., S.G.; data curation, M.M.; A.P.L. and L.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, A.P.L., J.P.D., L.C., N.U., C.F., U.S., S.G.; visualization, M.M., A.P.L., L.C.; supervision, A.P.L., N.U. and C.F.; project administration, M.M. and A.P.L.; funding acquisition, A.P.L. and L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by project UIDB/CVT/00772/2020 funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT).
Institutional Review Board Statement
All clinical procedures complied with the Portuguese legislation for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (i.e., Decree-Law no. 113/2013, of 7 August 2013), which transposes European legislation (i.e., Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 22 September 2010). Animal capture at the Lorenzensplate was approved under permit number Az V312- 72241.121-19 (70-6/07) at the Ministry of Energy, Agriculture, Environment and Rural Areas of Germany and from the Danish Nature Agency (SNS-3446-00054 and SN 2001-34461/SN-0005) and the Animal Welfare Division (Ministry of Justice, 2005/561- 976).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the people who were involved in making this project a success. Catches on the Lorenzensplate were supported by the Schleswig-Holstein’s Government-Owned Company for Coastal Protection, National Parks and Ocean Protection and Ministry of Energy Transition, Agriculture, Environment and Rural Areas Schleswig-Holstein. The authors are also grateful to all the helpers who participated in the seal catches in Germany and especially Miriam Hillmann and Conny Wolf-Schmidt for the technical assistance.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 52–216. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, M.A.; Gardner, I.A.; Kreuder, C.; Paradies, D.M.; Worcester, K.R.; Jessup, D.A.; Dodd, E.; Harris, M.D.; Ames, J.A.; Packham, A.E.; et al. Coastal freshwater runoff is a risk factor for Toxoplasma gondii infection of southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis). Int. J. Parasitol. 2002, 32, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, M.A. Tissue Cyst-Forming Coccidia of Marine Mammals. In Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine Current Therapy, 6th ed.; Fowler, M.E., Miller, R.E., Eds.; Saunders: St. Louis, MI, USA, 2008; Volume 6, pp. 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsay, D.S.; Phelps, K.K.; Smith, S.A.; Flick, G.; Sumner, S.S.; Dubey, J.P. Removal of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts from sea water by eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica). J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2001, 48, 197S–198S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arkush, K.D.; Miller, M.A.; Leutenegger, C.M.; Gardner, I.A.; Packham, A.E.; Heckeroth, A.R.; Tenter, A.M.; Barr, B.C.; Conrad, P.A. Molecular and bioassay-based detection of Toxoplasma gondii oocyst uptake by mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis). Int. J. Parasitol. 2003, 33, 1087–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsay, D.S.; Collins, M.V.; Mitchell, S.M.; Wetch, C.N.; Rosypal, A.C.; Flick, G.J.; Zajac, A.M.; Lindquist, A.; Dubey, J.P. Survival of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica). J. Parasitol. 2004, 90, 1054–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massie, G.N.; Ware, M.W.; Villegas, E.N.; Black, M.W. Uptake and transmission of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by migratory, filter-feeding fish. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 169, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Donahoe, S.L.; Rose, K.; Šlapeta, J. Multisystemic toxoplasmosis associated with a type II-like Toxoplasma gondii strain in a New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) from New South Wales, Australia. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 205, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carlson-Bremer, D.; Colegrove, K.M.; Gulland, F.M.D.; Conrad, P.A.; Mazet, J.A.K.; Johnson, C.K. Epidemiology and pathology of Toxoplasma gondii in free-ranging California sea lions (Zalophus californianus). J. Wildl. Dis. 2015, 51, 362–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barbieri, M.M.; Kashinsky, L.; Rotstein, D.S.; Colegrove, K.M.; Haman, K.H.; Magargal, S.L.; Sweeny, A.R.; Kaufman, A.C.; Grigg, M.E.; Littnan, C.L. Protozoal-related mortalities in endangered Hawaiian monk seals Neomonachus schauinslandi. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2016, 121, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubey, J.P.; Murata, F.H.A.; Cerqueira-Cézar, C.K.; Kwok, O.C.H.; Grigg, M.E. Recent epidemiologic and clinical importance of Toxoplasma gondii infections in marine mammals: 2009–2020. Vet. Parasitol. 2020, 288, 109296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roe, W.D.; Michael, S.; Fyfe, J.; Burrows, E.; Hunter, S.A.; Howe, L. First report of systemic toxoplasmosis in a New Zealand sea lion (Phocarctos hookeri). NZ Vet. J. 2016, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, M.A.; Shapiro, K.; Murray, M.J.; Haulena, M.; Raverty, S. Protozoan parasites of marine mammals. In CRC Handbook of Marine Mammal Medicine, 3rd ed.; Gulland, F.M.D., Dierauf, L.A., Whitman, K.L., Eds.; CRC Press Publisher: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; Volume 3, pp. 425–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubey, J.P.; Zarnke, R.; Thomas, N.J.; Wong, S.K.; Van Bonn, W.; Briggs, M.; Davis, J.W.; Ewing, R.; Mense, M.; Kwok, O.C.H.; et al. Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum, Sarcocystis neurona, and Sarcocystis canis-like infections in marine mammals. Vet. Parasitol. 2003, 116, 275–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Measures, L.N.; Dubey, J.P.; Labelle, P.; Martineau, D. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Canadian pinnipeds. J. Wildl. Dis. 2004, 40, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cabezón, O.; Hall, A.J.; Vincent, C.; Pabón, M.; García-Bocanegra, I.; Dubey, J.P.; Almería, S. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in North-eastern Atlantic harbor seal (Phoca vitulina vitulina) and grey seal (Halichoerus grypus). Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 179, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simon, A.; Chambellant, M.; Ward, B.J.; Simard, M.; Proulx, J.F.; Levesque, B.; Bigras-Poulin, M.; Rousseau, A.N.; Ogden, N.H. Spatio-temporal variations and age effect on Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in seals from the Canadian Arctic. Parasitology 2011, 138, 1362–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Alvarado-Esquivel, C.; Sánchez-Okrucky, R.; Dubey, J.P. Serological evidence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in captive marine mammals in Mexico. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 184, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rengifo-Herrera, C.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Álvarez-García, G.; Gómez-Bautista, M.; García-Párraga, D.; García-Peña, F.J.; Pedraza-Díaz, S. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in Antarctic pinnipeds. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 190, 259–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Namroodi, S.; Shirazi, A.S.; Khaleghi, S.R.; Mills, J.N.; Kheirabady, V. Frequency of exposure of endangered Caspian seals to Canine distemper virus, Leptospira interrogans, and Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cano-Terriza, D.; Almería, S.; Caballero-Gómez, J.; Jiménez-Martín, D.; Castro-Scholten, S.; Dubey, J.P.; García-Bocanegra, I. Exposure to Toxoplasma gondii in zoo animals in Spain. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dumètre, A.; Le Bras, C.; Baffet, M.; Meneceur, P.; Dubey, J.P.; Derouin, F.; Duguet, J.; Joyeux, M.; Moulin, L. Effects of ozone and ultraviolet radiation treatments on the infectivity of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 153, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wainwright, K.E.; Miller, M.A.; Barr, B.C.; Gardner, I.A.; Melli, A.C.; Essert, T.; Packham, A.E.; Truong, T.; Lagunas-Solar, M.; Conrad, P.A. Chemical inactivation of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in water. J. Parasitol. 2007, 93, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jensen, S.K.; Aars, J.; Lydersen, C.; Kovacs, K.M.; Åsbakk, K. The prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in polar bears and their marine mammal prey: Evidence for a marine transmission pathway? Polar Biol. 2010, 33, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hueffer, K.; Holcomb, D.; Ballweber, L.R.; Gende, S.M.; Blundell, G.; O’Hara, T.M. Serologic surveillance of pathogens in a declining harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) population in Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska, USA and a Reference Site. J. Wildl. Dis. 2011, 47, 984–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van de Velde, N.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Leopold, M.; Begeman, L.; IJsseldijk, L.; Hiemstra, S.; IJzer, J.; Brownlow, A.; Davison, N.; Haelters, J.; et al. Toxoplasma gondii in stranded marine mammals from the North Sea and Eastern Atlantic Ocean: Findings and diagnostic difficulties. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 230, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mazzariol, S.; Centelleghe, C.; Petrella, A.; Marcer, F.; Beverelli, M.; Di Francesco, C.E.; Di Francesco, G.; Di Renzo, L.; Di Guardo, G.; Audino, T.; et al. Atypical Toxoplasmosis in a Mediterranean Monk Seal (Monachus monachus) Pup. J. Comp. Pathol. 2021, 184, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reiling, S.J.; Measures, L.; Feng, S.; Boone, R.; Merks, H.; Dixon, B.R. Toxoplasma gondii, Sarcocystis sp. and Neospora caninum-like parasites in seals from northern and eastern Canada: Potential risk to consumers. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berta, A. Pinnipedia, Overview. In Encyclcopedia of Marine Mammals, 2nd ed.; Perrin, W., Würsig, B., Thewissen, J.G.M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 878–890. [Google Scholar]
- Michael, S.A.; Howe, L.; Chilvers, B.L.; Morel, P.C.H.; Roe, W.D. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in mainland and sub-Antarctic New Zealand sea lion (Phocarctos hookeri) populations. N. Z. Vet. J. 2016, 64, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lagrée, A. Les Infections Par Toxoplasma Gondii Chez Les Mammifères. Bull. De L’académie Vétérinaire De Fr. 2015, 168, 148–155. [Google Scholar]
- Aguirre, A.A.; Keefe, T.J.; Reif, J.S.; Kashinsky, L.; Yochem, P.K.; Saliki, J.T.; Stott, J.L.; Goldstein, T.; Dubey, J.P.; Braun, R.; et al. Infectious disease monitoring of the endangered Hawaiian monk seal. J. Wildl. Dis. 2007, 43, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fujii, K.; Kakumoto, C.; Kobayashi, M.; Saito, S.; Kariya, T.; Watanabe, Y.; Xuan, X.; Igarashi, I.; Suzuki, M. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in Seals around Hokkaido, Japan. J. Vet. Med Sci. 2007, 69, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jensen, S.K.; Nymo, I.H.; Forcada, J.; Godfroid, J.; Hall, A. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in pinnipeds from Antarctica. Vet. Rec. 2012, 171, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambourn, D.M.; Jeffries, S.J.; Dubey, J.P. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina) in Southern Puget Sound, Washington. J. Parasitol. 2001, 87, 1196–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greig, D.J.; Gulland, F.M.D.; Smith, W.A.; Conrad, P.A.; Field, C.L.; Fleetwood, M.; Harvey, J.T.; Ip, H.S.; Jang, S.; Packham, A.; et al. Surveillance for zoonotic and selected pathogens in harbor seals Phoca vitulina from central California. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2014, 111, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mohamed, Z.; Hajissa, K. Effective Diagnostic Marker for Serodiagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii Infection: New Developments and Perspectives. In Toxoplasmosis, 1st ed.; Akyar, I., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017; pp. 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Villard, O.; Cimon, B.; L’Ollivier, C.; Fricker-Hidalgo, H.; Godineau, N.; Houze, S.; Paris, L.; Pelloux, H.; Villena, I.; Candolfi, E. Serological diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Recommendations from the French National Reference Center for Toxoplasmosis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 84, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Scribble Maps. Available online: https://www.scribblemaps.com/ (accessed on 17 October 2021).
- Hasselmeier, I.; Fonfara, S.; Driver, J.; Siebert, U. Differential Hematology Profiles of Free-Ranging, Rehabilitated, and Captive Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina) of the German North Sea. Aquat. Mamm. 2008, 34, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gajadhar, A.A.; Measures, L.; Forbes, L.B.; Kapel, C.; Dubey, J.P. Experimental Toxoplasma gondii infection in grey seals (Halichoerus grypus). J. Parasitol. 2004, 90, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Wang, Z.D.; Huang, S.Y.; Zhu, X.Q. Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and typing of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wyrosdick, H.M.; Schaefer, J.J. Toxoplasma gondii: History and diagnostic test development. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2015, 16, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
Location of Mundo Aquático SA - Zoomarine Portugal (A) and capture location of wild harbor seals included in the present study (B). Adapted from Scribble Maps [39].
Figure 1.
Location of Mundo Aquático SA - Zoomarine Portugal (A) and capture location of wild harbor seals included in the present study (B). Adapted from Scribble Maps [39].
Table 1.
Toxoplasma gondii positivity and modified agglutination test (MAT) titres in pinnipeds under human care and wild pinnipeds.
Table 1.
Toxoplasma gondii positivity and modified agglutination test (MAT) titres in pinnipeds under human care and wild pinnipeds.
| Common Name (Scientific name) | No. MAT Positive/No. Tested (n) | Antibody Titres | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <25 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 | 800 | 1600 | ≥3200 | ||
| Pinnipeds under human care | 12/60 | 48 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) | 2/12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) | 0/7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus) | 0/2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) | 2/13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ringed seal (Pusa hispida) | 0/1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| South African fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus) | 4/20 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens) | 4/5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wild pinnipeds | 3/109 | 106 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) | 0/4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) | 2/99 | 97 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Hooded seal (Cystophora cristata) | 1/6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 15/169 | 154 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Table 2.
Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pinnipeds according to the independent variables studied.
Table 2.
Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pinnipeds according to the independent variables studied.
| Independent Variable | Animals Tested (n) | Relative Distribution (%) | MAT-Positive (n) | Prevalence (%) | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provenance | |||||
| Under human care | 60 | 35.5 | 12 | 20.0 | 10.8–32.3 |
| Wild | 109 | 64.5 | 3 | 2.8 | 0.6–7.8 |
| Family | |||||
| Otariidae | 37 | 21.9 | 10 | 27.0 | 13.8–44.1 |
| Phocidae | 132 | 78.1 | 5 | 3.8 | 1.2–8.6 |
| Diet | |||||
| Fresh and/or frozen fish | 109 | 64.4 | 3 | 2.8 | 0.6–7.8 |
| Frozen fish | 60 | 35.6 | 12 | 20.0 | 10.8–32.3 |
| Sex | |||||
| Female | 70 | 41.4 | 7 | 10.0 | 4.1–19.5 |
| Male | 99 | 58.6 | 8 | 8.1 | 3.6–15.3 |
| Age | |||||
| Subadult | 21 | 12.4 | 1 | 4.8 | 0.1–23.8 |
| Adult | 148 | 87.6 | 14 | 9.5 | 5.3–15.4 |
| Clinical status | |||||
| Apparently healthy | 57 | 81.4 | 8 | 14.0 | 6.3–25.8 |
| Clinically sick | 13 | 18.6 | 5 | 38.5 | 13.9–68.4 |
| Birthplace * | |||||
| Zoomarine | 10 | 16.7 | 1 | 10.0 | 0.3–44.5 |
| Other location | 50 | 83.3 | 11 | 22.0 | 11.5–36.0 |
| Presence of felids around habitats * | |||||
| Absent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ND |
| Present | 60 | 100 | 12 | 20.0 | 10.8–32.3 |
| Pregnancy * | |||||
| Non-pregnant | 14 | 60.9 | 5 | 35.7 | 12.8–64.9 |
| Pregnant | 9 | 39.1 | 1 | 11.1 | 0.3–48.3 |
| Abortion * | |||||
| No miscarriage | 21 | 91.3 | 6 | 28.6 | 11.3–52.2 |
| ≥1 miscarriage | 2 | 8.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.0–84.2 |
| TOTAL | 169 | 100 | 15 | 8.9 | 5.1–14.2 |
* = only pinnipeds under human care; CI = confidence interval; MAT = modified agglutination test; ND = not determined.
Table 3.
Antibody titres to Toxoplasma gondii by the modified agglutination test (MAT) in seropositive pinnipeds under human care sampled twice.
Table 3.
Antibody titres to Toxoplasma gondii by the modified agglutination test (MAT) in seropositive pinnipeds under human care sampled twice.
| Common Name (Scientific name) | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2007 | 2013 | 2017 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) | <25 | - | - | - | 25 | - | - | - | - |
| California sea lion | - | - | - | 50 | 25 | - | - | - | - |
| Harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) | - | <25 | - | - | 25 | - | - | - | - |
| Harbor seal | - | <25 | - | 25 | - | - | - | - | - |
| South African fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus) | - | - | 800 | - | 50 | - | - | - | - |
| South African fur seal | - | - | - | - | ≥3200 | 100 | - | - | - |
| South African fur seal | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ≥3200 | ≥3200 |
| South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens) | - | - | - | 100 | 100 | - | - | - | - |
| South American sea lion | - | - | <25 | - | 100 | - | - | - | - |
| South American sea lion | <25 | - | - | - | 100 | - | - | - | - |
| South American sea lion | - | 50 | - | - | 100 | - | - | - | - |
Table 4.
Species and number of pinnipeds tested for Toxoplasma gondii IgG according to their provenance.
Table 4.
Species and number of pinnipeds tested for Toxoplasma gondii IgG according to their provenance.
| Common Name (Scientific name) | Provenance | Location | No. Animals Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Family Otariidae | |||
| California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) | Human care | Zoomarine Portugal | 12 |
| South African fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus) | Human care | Zoomarine Portugal | 20 |
| South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens) | Human care | Zoomarine Portugal | 5 |
| Family Phocidae | |||
| Grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) | Human care | Zoomarine Portugal | 7 |
| Wild | South Portuguese coast | 4 | |
| Harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) | Human care | Zoomarine Portugal | 13 |
| Wild | Lorenzensplate, Wadden Sea | 99 | |
| Harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus) | Human care | Zoomarine Portugal | 2 |
| Hooded seal (Cystophora cristata) | Wild | South Portuguese coast | 6 |
| Ringed seal (Pusa hispida) | Human care | Zoomarine Portugal | 1 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Martins, M.; Urbani, N.; Flanagan, C.; Siebert, U.; Gross, S.; Dubey, J.P.; Cardoso, L.; Lopes, A.P. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Pinnipeds under Human Care and in Wild Pinnipeds. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111415
AMA Style
Martins M, Urbani N, Flanagan C, Siebert U, Gross S, Dubey JP, Cardoso L, Lopes AP. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Pinnipeds under Human Care and in Wild Pinnipeds. Pathogens. 2021; 10(11):1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111415
Chicago/Turabian StyleMartins, Micaela, Nuno Urbani, Carla Flanagan, Ursula Siebert, Stephanie Gross, Jitender P. Dubey, Luís Cardoso, and Ana Patrícia Lopes. 2021. "Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Pinnipeds under Human Care and in Wild Pinnipeds" Pathogens 10, no. 11: 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111415
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
