2. Interventions into Extra Familial Harm
Extra-Familial Harm and Surveillance Approaches
There was consensus that relationship building has been and is at the heart of good practice. The challenge for all of us is how to create the conditions within children’s social care and family justice that allow good relationships to flourish everywhere, within and between agencies, within families, and between families and practitioners.
urban youth, overall, express a strong sense of betrayal by adults and report feeling mistrusted by adults, with young men of color most likely to report these perceptions.
3. Analytical Framework
Creating an Analytic Framework
- Focus/rationale: Who or what is the focus of the intervention and what is the legal/moral justification?
- Method: How does the system or intervention pursue its aim and through which methods?
- Impact: What is the impact on those subject to interventions?
4.1. Study 1: A Regionally Coordinated Cross-Sector Response to Child Exploitation
Case Study 1: Identification, Mapping and Network Analysis
4.2. Study 2: Developing and Embedding a Whole Systems Approach to Extra-Familial Harm
Case Study 2: Context Assessments
- Forming a youth panel of 10 young people engaged weekly
- Five focus groups with young people from the youth club and school
- Young person engagement at the local youth club
- Business surveys with local businesses
- Review local regeneration board minutes
- A member of the assessment team located weekly in the community centre
- A weekend local community event to engage local residents and young people
6. Discussion and Conclusions
Conflicts of Interest
- ADCS. 2017. ADCS Response to Working Together to Safeguard Children: Changes to Statutory Guidance. Available online: https://adcs.org.uk/assets/documentation/ADCS_response_Working_Together_FINAL_20_December_2017.pdf (accessed on 17 September 2019).
- ALDCS. 2018. The Response of London Children’s Services to Serious Youth Violence and Knife Crime—May 2018. Available online: https://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/node/34040 (accessed on 6 January 2019).
- Amnesty. 2018. Trapped in the Gangs Matrix. Available online: https://yjlc.uk/child-spies-being-used-to-gather-intelligence/ (accessed on 24 February 2020).
- Beckett, Helen, and Camille Warrington. 2015. Making Justice Work: Experiences of Criminal Justice for Children and Young People Affected by Sexual Exploitation as Victims and Witnesses. Luton: University of Bedfordshire. [Google Scholar]
- Bryan, Agnes, Helen Hingley-Jones, and Gillian Ruch. 2016. Relationship Based Practice Revisited. Journal of Social Work Practice 30: 229–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Care Crisis Review. 2018. Care Crisis Review: Options for Change. London: Family Rights Group. [Google Scholar]
- Carlo, Silkie, and Jennifer Krueckeberg. 2018. The State of Surveillance in 2018. Available online: https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/The-State-of-Surveillance-in-2018.pdf (accessed on 27 February 2020).
- Community Practitioner. 2019. Knife Crime: Where’s the Public Health Approach? Available online: https://www.communitypractitioner.co.uk/sites/default/files/media/document/2019/news_big_story_community_practitioner_julyaugust_2019_community_practitioner_magazine.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2020).
- Cossar, Jeanette, Marian Brandon, and Peter Jordan. 2016. ‘You’ve got to trust her and she’s got to trust you’: Children’s views on participation in the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work 21: 103–12. [Google Scholar]
- Department for Education. 2018a. Keeping Children Safe in Education Staturotry Guidance for Schools and Colleges; London: Crown Copyright.
- Department for Education. 2018b. Working Together to Safeguard Children; London: Author.
- Department for Education. 2019. Characteristics of Children in Need: 2018 to 2019. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843046/Characteristics_of_children_in_need_2018_to_2019_main_text.pdf (accessed on 25 February 2020).
- Dillon, Jo, Daz Greenop, and Mel Hills. 2019. Participation in Child Protection; A small-scale qualitative study. Qualitative Social Work 15: 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, Frank. 2016. Saving Children, Controlling Families: Punishment, Redistribution, and Child Protection. American Sociological Review 81: 575–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eubanks, Virginia. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High Tech Tools Profile, Police and Punish the Poor. New York: St Martins Press. [Google Scholar]
- Featherstone, Brid, Anna Gupta, Kate Morris, and Sue White. 2018. Protecting Children: A Social Model. Bristol: Policy Press. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez, Luis A., and Laura Huey. 2009. Is resistance futile? Some thoughts on resisting surveillance. Surveillance & Society 6: 198–202. [Google Scholar]
- Fine, Michelle, Nick Freudenberg, Yasser Payne, Tiffany Perkins, Kersha Smith, and Katya Wanzer. 2003. “Anything can happen with police around”: Urban youth evaluate strategies of surveillance in public places. Journal of Social Issues 59: 141–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firmin, Carlene. 2017. Abuse between Young People: A Contextual Account. Oxon: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Firmin, Carlene, Lauren Wroe, and Jenny Lloyd. 2019. Safeguarding and Exploitation—Complex, Contextual and Holistic Approaches. Strategic Briefing. Darlington: Research in Practice. [Google Scholar]
- Harden, Troy, Thomas Kenemore, Kimberley Mann, Michael Edwards, Christine List, and Karen Jean Martinson. 2014. The truth ‘n’ trauma project: Addressing community violence through a youth-led, trauma-informed and restorative framework. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 32: 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hingley-Jones, Helen, and Gillian Ruch. 2016. ‘Stumbling through’? Relationships-based social work practice in austere times. Journal of Social Work Practice 30: 235–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jay, Alexis. 2014. Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham: 1997–2013; Rotherham: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council.
- Lammy, David. 2017. The Lammy Review: An Independent Review into the Treatment of, and Outcomes for, Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Individuals in the Criminal Justice System. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/643001/lammy-review-final-report.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2020).
- Lloyd, Jenny, and Carlene Firmin. 2019. No Further Action: Contextualising Social Care Decisions for Children Victimised in Extra-Familial Settings. Youth Justice. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Llywodraeth Cymru. 2019. Safeguarding children from Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE). Available online: https://gov.wales/safeguarding-children-child-sexual-exploitation (accessed on 24 February 2020).
- McKendrick, David, and Jo Finch. 2017. ‘Under heavy manners?’: Social work, radicalisation, troubled families and non-linear war. British Journal of Social Work 47: 308–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mellon, Maggie. 2017. Child Protection: Listening and Learning from Parents. Available online: https://www.iriss.org.uk/resources/insights/child-protection-listening-and-learning-parents (accessed on 24 February 2020).
- Montgomery, Kathryn C. 2015. Youth and surveillance in the Facebook era: Policy interventions and social implications. Telecommunications Policy 39: 771–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris, Kate. 2012. Troubled families: Vulnerable families experiences of multiple service use. Child and Family Social Work 18: 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munro, Eileen. 2011. The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final Report, a Child-Centred System. London: The Stationery Office, vol. 8062. [Google Scholar]
- O’Neill, Megan, and Bethan Loftus. 2013. Policing and the surveillance of the marginal: Everyday contexts of social control. Theoretical Criminology 17: 437–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parton, Nigel. 2000. Some thoughts on the relationship between theory & practice in and for social work. British Journal of Social Work 30: 449–63. [Google Scholar]
- Parton, Nigel. 2011. Child protection and safeguarding in England: Changing and competing notions of risk and their implications for social work. British Journal of Social Work 41: 845–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parton, Nigel. 2019. Changing and competing conceptions of risk and their implications for public health approaches to child protection. In Re-Visioning Public Health Approaches for Protecting Children. Edited by Bob Lonne, Deb Scott, Daryl Higgins and Todd Herrenkohl. Basel: Springer, chp. 5. pp. 65–78. ISBN 978-83-030-05857-9. [Google Scholar]
- Penna, Sue. 2005. The Children Act 2004: Child Protection and Social Surveillance. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 27: 143–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shabde, Neela, and Alan W. Craft. 1999. Covert video surveillance: An important investigative tool or a breach of trust? Archives of Disease in Childhood 81: 291–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shade, Leslie Regan, and Rianka Singh. 2016. “Honestly we’re not spying on kids”: School surveillance of young people’s social media. Social Media and Society 2: 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stability Index. 2019. Available online: https://childrenscommissioner.github.io/stabilityindex2019/ (accessed on 27 February 2020).
- Stanley, Tony, Surinder Guru, and Anna Gupta. 2018. Working with PREVENT: Social work options for cases of ‘radicalisation risk’. Practice: Social Work in Action 30: 131–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Twite, Jennifer. 2018. Child Spies Being Used to Gather Intelligence on County Lines Gangs. Available online: https://yjlc.uk/child-spies-being-used-to-gather-intelligence/ (accessed on 24 February 2020).
- United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1989. United Nations, Treaty Series; New York: United Nations, vol. 1577, p. 3.
- van Bijleveld, Ganna G., Christine W. M. Dedding, and Joske F. G. Bunders-Aelen. 2013. Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child and Family Social Work 20: 129–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warrington, Camille, Elizabeth Ackerley, Helen Beckett, Megan Walker, and Debbie Allnock. 2017. Making Noise: Children’s Voices for Positive Change after Sexual Abuse. Luton: University of Bedfordshire/Office of Children’s Commissioner. [Google Scholar]
- White, Sue, and David Wastell. 2017. The rise and rise of prevention science in UK family welfare: Surveillance gets under the skin. Families, Relationships and Societies 6: 427–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, Patrick. 2018. Being Matrixed: The (Over)Policing of Gang Suspects in London. London: StopWatch, Available online: www.stop-watch.org/uploads/documents/Being_Matrixed.pdf (accessed on 28 February 2020).
- Williams, Patrick, and Becky Clarke. 2016. Dangerous Associations: Joint Enterprise, Gangs and Racism: An Analysis of the Processes of Criminalisation of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Individuals. Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. Available online: https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/Dangerous%20assocations%20Joint%20Enterprise%20gangs%20and%20racism.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2020).
- Wrennall, Lynne. 2010. Surveillance and child protection: De-mystifying the Trojan Horse. Surveillance & Society 7: 304–24. [Google Scholar]
|Relationships of Trust||Relationships of Surveillance|
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).