Next Article in Journal
Victimization, Social Structure and Psychosocial Variables: The Case of Spain in 1999 and 2016
Previous Article in Journal
Analyzing 21st Century Video Data on Situational Dynamics—Issues and Challenges in Video Data Analysis
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2019, 8(3), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8030101

What Works in Democratic Dialogue?

1
Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Kalevantie 4, 33014 Tampere, Finland
2
Independent researcher, 33580 Tampere, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 14 January 2019 / Revised: 12 March 2019 / Accepted: 14 March 2019 / Published: 20 March 2019
  |  
PDF [481 KB, uploaded 20 March 2019]
  |  

Abstract

As the global world produces new social problems and the continuously changing environment of work organizations calls for new modes of operation, there emerges a need for discussion forums to analyze and find practical solutions, involving the people concerned. This article examines, within the framework of realist evaluation, the potential of democratic dialogue, a Nordic method of workplace development, to generate outcomes that are put into practice in work organizations. Democratic dialogue is seen as a social program that, by providing the participants with new resources and new reasoning in work conferences and other dialogue forums, enables them to make new choices. The focus is on three Finnish action research networks applying democratic dialogue, and the recompilation of these cases along the Context-Mechanism-Outcomes formula of realist evaluation. Changes in the organizational patterns of communication, linked to the criteria of democratic dialogue and the design of work conferences, are identified and examined through the lenses of varied organizational concepts that elaborate the underlying processes generating change. The article suggests further research to compare cases with the same starting points but differing outcomes to trace the finer distinctions in the preconditions for accomplishing the desired objectives. View Full-Text
Keywords: democratic dialogue; work conferences; workplace development; realist evaluation; Finnish action research cases democratic dialogue; work conferences; workplace development; realist evaluation; Finnish action research cases
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kalliola, S.; Heiskanen, T.; Kivimäki, R. What Works in Democratic Dialogue? Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 101.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top