Next Article in Journal
Coffee, Migration and Climatic Changes: Challenging Adaptation Dichotomic Narratives in a Transborder Region
Previous Article in Journal
Big Data and Employee Wellbeing: Walking the Tightrope between Utopia and Dystopia

Soc. Sci. 2019, 8(12), 322; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8120322

Article
Culture and Art Education to Promote Cultural Welfare in Civil Society
Seoul Business School, Seoul School of Integrated Sciences and Technologies, Seoul 03767, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 6 October 2019 / Accepted: 15 November 2019 / Published: 22 November 2019

Abstract

:
Today, intellectual education based on the various experiences and emotions of citizens through culture and art education draws attention in terms of obtaining improvements in social welfare. Citizens can become further aware of culture and art and get a wider range of benefits in cultural welfare. Culture and art education are important activities of cultural welfare. This study examines some of the successes of the Seoul Arts Center academy, which represents and hosts diverse cultural and art activities in South Korea. These activities have led to successful promotion of culture and art education for Seoul citizens. Based on Lewin’s change management process model, the cases that were analyzed focus on the change in culture and art education in the Seoul Arts Center academy. Findings from this study indicate the contribution to the improvement in cultural welfare for citizens from their engagement in activities within art education and culture. The discussion also highlights that good management of the changes in educational activity with the citizens’ needs and improvements in the maturity of civil society were critical factors for educational sustainability and success.
Keywords:
cultural welfare; art education; civil society; social public service

1. Introduction

The 21st century has resulted in a dream society and has attached importance to imagination and originality following the rise of an information-based society. In this context, culture has drawn attention as a key element of imagination and creativity (Haylett 2003). In particular, Asian countries like South Korea, Japan, China, and Taiwan implement cultural policies to improve the quality of life for individual citizens; in particular, they provide a diversity of welfare policies and programs to support social phenomena (Geyer 1998). For instance, advanced countries pursue mental affluence, which involves self-realization beyond the economic level, in line with the characteristics of people having increasing interest in the quality of life after changing their lifestyles toward a higher level of living and economic growth (Van Oorschot 2007).
In the past, welfare states guaranteed their citizens the material needs to maintain human dignity through the system of welfare, with the objective of solving the problem of poverty resulting from the development of the industrial society (Effinger 2005). In a general situation, governments have limitations in raising the quality of life for individuals, as the focus of quality of life has shifted from material affluence to mental affluence. However, welfare for human well-being needs to pursue affluent lives at the mental and cultural levels as well as at the material level (Mora et al. 2018). Therefore, welfare countries need to attach importance to the human realization of a community, as well as to equal opportunities. Societies also should allow their individual members to develop their potential and creativity to the utmost and to guarantee a minimum living (Yeates 2001). In this respect, culture can be a requisite for the realization of a welfare society, and the reinforcement of cultural welfare can meet the changes in life and diverse needs of individuals for welfare while guaranteeing the quality of mental and cultural life for the whole nation on an institutional basis.
In this respect, culture and art education becomes an important tool to realize cultural welfare. Artistic experiences in childhood have mental and emotional effects even in adulthood and help to form artistic taste (Parc and Moon 2019). Culture and art education affect cultural and artistic consumption and play a crucial role in laying the ground for spontaneous improvement in the quality of life through culture and art. In particular, the area of culture and art forms a crucial part in the leisure life of people, and the needs for the educational activity of learning and training for culture and art are reinforced and activated gradually (Kendall et al. 2006). While it is important to produce high-level performances and cultivate experts, the activation of culture and art education to draw attention from citizens in the market environment, along with increasing needs for viewing cultural and artistic performances actively and experiencing them personally, is becoming an important issue in activating culture and art education (Cha 2006).
For example, the Survey Report on Cultural Enjoyment given by the South Korean Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism (2018) found that the rate of experiencing out-of-school culture education was 11.2% and 0.6%, up from 10.6% in 2016. Moreover, culture and art education are characterized by the gradual increase in the experience of education in such genres as “art exhibitions” or “Western music” rather than in “traditional art,” “drama,” or “musicals.” Such a higher rate of experiencing culture education demonstrates that the audience’s need for general knowledge about culture and arts to enjoy performances more actively, instead of being satisfied with appreciation, is more widely recognized, and that the necessity for an environment for pursuing the expansion of humanistic thinking through the pursuit of knowledge based on culture and art is reinforced.
To meet these social changes, the South Korean government continues to change its direction for cultural welfare policies and to provide culture and art education through the Seoul Arts Center academy, in order to improve the cultural welfare of citizens. This study aimed to analyze how the Seoul Arts Center, a cultural complex representing South Korea, has promoted and provided culture education through its academy and promoted cultural welfare to meet citizens’ concerns and needs for culture and art. It is intended to discuss the expansive topic of realizing cultural welfare and education by performing a case analysis of change management in the Seoul Arts Center academy that reflected the current environment and citizens’ needs to provide new education programs and improve educational expertise.

2. Literature Reviews

2.1. Cultural Welfare of Civil Society

Today, the concept of social welfare has shifted from charity to justice, from a residual concept to an institutional one, and from a selective principle to a universal one, during the course of which the association between culture and welfare has been discussed (Bianchini and Parkinson 1993). The classical meaning of welfare is the development of various social security systems, medical care, or social insurance, such as the guarantee of a minimum income, protection of socially underprivileged citizens, improvements in social equity, and wealth redistribution (Bent-Goodley 2005). However, with the changes in the social environment emphasizing the mental needs and humane diversification in terms of development and expansion into the area of social welfare, the formation of conditions in which individuals can exert their creativity and the maximization of social potential has become the new ideology of social welfare, highlighting the importance of cultural living and life (Song and Kim 2013).
It can be said that cultural welfare also starts from the perspective of recognizing the right to culture as a civil right (Da Silva et al. 2018). The right to culture was advocated by Huber (1990), who introduced the concept of a cultural state, which was founded as cultural autonomy increased in the personal arena, with the growth of the civil class and state-made policies with respect to people’s right to enjoy culture (Pusztai and Kocsis 2019). Now, it principally means the right to approach and participate in culture education and activities, as well as for political and social equality, which are being settled as major civil rights (Kim 2013; McGuigan 2005).
In particular, as the concept and area of social welfare expanded along with rapid social changes, cultural welfare has been classified as the field to achieve what social welfare pursues for the purpose of improving one’s quality of life. Ultimately, cultural welfare aims to prevent and treat the culturally underprivileged or the cultural dropouts suffering cultural deficiency in a narrow sense and is a socio-cultural service to improve and refine the cultural environment to meet the people’s cultural demand in cultural living and cultural needs, provide the cultural service individuals personally require, and improve cultural life in a broad sense (Muller et al. 1988; Hyun 2012).
Such cultural welfare has been understood and discussed through two approaches: social welfare and cultural policies. In terms of social welfare based on the association between all the individuals and the entire socio-cultural environment, it can be said that cultural welfare aims to meet cultural needs, improve the quality of life, and pursue a good society in which to live (Parsons 1977). Because welfare at the basic level, which involves food, clothing, shelter, and health, includes the need for culture, the state needs to provide legislation, programs, and services to facilitate their provision. Many researchers already have explained the needs of cultural welfare policies to lead social integration and cultivate cultural citizens by allowing the whole nation, as well as the socially underprivileged bracket, to obtain cultural enjoyment and participation and by cultivating cultural emotionality and creativity (Jeon 2017). To do this, national activities such as support of culture and art programs, culture and art education, formation of a cultural environment, and building of a cultural welfare delivery system are performed in implementing cultural welfare policies.
Today, however, cultural welfare is redefined from the perspective of cultural and social integration. Cultural welfare is used as a concept that involves the securing of cultural enjoyment for the socially underprivileged bracket, delivery of cultural public service to the people in general, and many different cultural programs and public service to secure cultural diversity (Andreasen 1991). Therefore, cultural welfare policies need to provide cultural welfare programs that help conduct various activities related to culture and art and to give experiential chances to improve emotionality and expression through the medium of cultural creation and culture and art as public service. They need to target every bracket, not a specific one, and give opportunities to enhance the chances for cultural potential and self-realization through personal participation in cultural and artistic activities (Kim 2012).

2.2. Culture and the Arts

Culture education means every type of teaching activity that has a concept of culture and the arts, which involves literature, formative art, performing art, traditional art, cultural heritage, cultural industry, and living culture, or utilizes them in curriculums (Cho 2011). In another respect, culture education is defined as a course of discovering human existence by experiencing activity, realizing the self through culture, and understanding one’s own present beyond the level of teaching and expansion of knowledge and experiences on the basis of culture and the arts (Wiśniewska and Czajkowski 2017).
A cultural education can provide diverse educational effects across the areas of culture and art and comprehensively contains social values such as a lifelong journey, creativity enhancement, cultural literacy, cultural and artistic capabilities, and cultural matching from the perspective of social reconstruction and multicultural education (Jung 2008; Kim 2010). Therefore, culture can be applied as effective media to share and exchange morals, values, and codes of conduct with others in a society composed of human life, habits, and arts. Cultural education is not only of great help in forming a personality, which involves a sense of stability, accomplishment, and concentration, but it also serves as a means of communication for members of society (Jang 2019).
Many advanced countries that are aware of such advantages of culture and art education make various attempts to spread it all over their societies, promote citizens’ emotions by reinforcing culture education policies based on art activities, try to spread cultural democracy, and realize artistic creativity universally by giving social minorities chances to enjoy cultural and artistic experiences (Winner and Hetland 2000). Education policies underpinned by artistic experience give the people chances to experience and learn so that they can promote their cultural emotionality and creatively (Eisner 2000). Cultural education has recently seen its area expand on the basis of the basic plans for activating primary and secondary art education to promote creativity and character and the cultural enrichment policy tasks and implementation strategies (Gitomer et al. 1992).
The United States defines professionals who are artists participating in teaching activities as “teaching artists” or as “artist educators” and tries to spread culture and art education all over its society. The United Kingdom defines artist-educators as professional artists participating in social activity with complementary skills and educator’s emotions. They exert capabilities in three areas—art, education, and management—and are used as manpower, leading learning through artistic experiences in teaching. France announced the ‘Five-Year School Art and Culture Development Plan’ to provide students with the right to access high-quality culture and art education. The country has a catalytic and executive will to provide community harmony and a social call, not simple experiences or creations in art programs, as a core competence in culture and art through artistes intervenants (Jung 2008). These policies reportedly increased the number of artisans with original skills in the field of culture and art and resulted in national development. For examples, Germany focuses on the cultivation of experts in formative art education in many social communities and organizations. Japan has suggested various curriculums for art education programs in early childhood and primary school age group. Many advanced countries currently recognize the importance of cultural education, which is basic education for national competitiveness, and exert efforts to activate the arts through various approaches (Lee 2009; Jeon 2017).
However, the culture and art education of today distinguishes suppliers (educators, artists) from consumers (the people) and expands its category from the supplier-centered perspective to the consumer-centered one. In particular, culture and art education, which has been introduced strongly from the perspective of pragmatism to assist growth and development in several social areas and give courage to underprivileged neighbors in terms of cultural welfare policies, is accessed through programs based on the public and on the social environment and develops in terms of cultural welfare policies for citizens, which involve environmental dimensionality, accessibility, and opportunities (Dingil et al. 2019).

3. Research Method

3.1. Background of the Case Selection

The cultural welfare policies of South Korea aim to enable all of the country’s people to recieve cultural benefits without any discrimination (Lee 2009). Emphasis had been placed on state-led policies to support creators until the 1980s. With the reinforcement of cultural democratization, the independent Ministry of Culture was established, supplementing regional-based cultural facilities, such as culture centers, museums, and galleries. In the 2000s, efforts were made to realize cultural welfare by increasing culture-based facilities for lifelong learning based on participatory cultural activity to meet each citizen’s growth, by making policies for supporting the culturally underprivileged bracket, by cultivating cultural volunteers, and by developing cultural programs. Moreover, as the cultural welfare for citizens becomes more segmented and upgraded, particularly with emphasis placed on cultural enjoyment and experiences, education programs that allow one to enjoy culture and art activity deep in life are increasingly provided (Yang 2019).
The Seoul Arts Center established as part of these policies in 1988 is the first arts complex in South Korea that aims to “develop and promote culture and art and increase the chances for the people to enjoy culture and art.” Since 2001, it become a space for comprehensive support of artistic activity and set a goal, “making high-class arts popular and being settled as one of the 10 global art centers,” to provide good performances and exhibition contents. However in 2018, the center changed their vision as a civic institution to a more the satisfactory public culture service, and tried to promote cultural welfare for the people (The Seoul Arts Center 2018). In these contexts, the culture education programs in the Seoul Arts Center has grown. The Seoul Arts Center academy has become the center of culture education policies that represent South Korea. Also Seoul has shifted from cultural policies based on performance experience and expert cultivation to reinforcing the social culture communities and art education for citizens (The Seoul Arts Center 2017).
In particular, South Korea has created a social environment characterized by an upgrading in quality of life, by a rapid increase in the needs for leisure, by a higher level of knowledge and awareness of culture and art, and by needs for culture and art education being greater than ever among the citizens due to national development, with the GNP amounting to three million dollars. With such a change, the cultural welfare policies based on civil participation have been steadily implemented (Baek and Cho 2018). The Seoul Arts Center is a cultural welfare policy institution representing South Korea, and the center academy successfully had sought to reinforce the citizens’ needs for culture consumption and art education with its civil welfare development. In these context, this research selected the Seoul Arts Center Academy as the case to find the critical success factors affecting how to lead culture education based on the art activities, and important aspects of cultural welfare promotion for citizens with culture education programs.

3.2. Analytical Framework and Method

To analyze the activities of the Seoul Arts Center academy by stages according to temporal and social changes, the process model based on Lewin’s (1951) theory of change management was used as an analytical framework. Change management means a process in which a certain organization is changed and settled to cope with the changing social environment. Any organization needs to change its awareness, attitude, and working style to meet the changes in its surroundings, which involve legislation, systems, and the physical environment (Van de Ven and Poole 1995; Cummings and Worley 2005). Ultimately, public agencies that lead welfare policies may also give the first priority to organizational activities to achieve the goal of the policies, but also need to pursue changes suitable for social fluctuation and the changing civil consciousness (Ricardo 1995). Any policy or welfare far from the environment of the times is unable to produce positive effects on the civil society (Cutler and Waine 1994; Lee et al. 2019); in particular, welfare policies have also faced an environment requiring a new, innovative attempt and change management through public agencies, which can be more important than ever (Gates 1980; Serre 2017).
To analyze the cases, this study used the three-stage model which involve ans ‘unfreezing stage’, ‘moving stage, and ‘refreezing stage’ in change management theory as the analysis framework. First, the unfreezing stage involves setting a goal and strategy for change with a sense of need for environmental, internal, and external changes. The start of the Seoul Arts Center academy, with its educational activity based on the cultural welfare policies to improve the cultural and artistic grounding for citizens instead of focusing on hosting of performance as before, was analyzed. Second, moving stage enabled the newly targeted activity of change to be settled and reinforced within the organization. Case analysis was performed, focusing on the process in which the Seoul Arts Center academy had its education and became more professionally system-based and expansive. Third, refreezing stage aimed to lead more advanced organizational activity through stabilization and systematization. The new attempts and changes in consciousness in the process of pursuing the secondary changes, with the growth of the Seoul Arts Center academy, were analyzed.
This study used experiential research on the phenomenon within the real-life context with unclear boundaries between the context and the phenomenon, as defined by Yin (1981), to perform case analysis. The method of examining and analyzing the in-depth data regarding status quo, environmental characteristics, and interaction in the natural state, as suggested by Morgan (1993) was used to present in-depth facts about the Seoul Arts Center academy, introducing and giving culture education and taking the lead in the changes. The internal data of the Seoul Arts Center academy like annual reports, strategic reports, education planning documents, image photos, and films was used to analyze the case. And interviews with the academy members, including educators and managers, and the researcher’s own experiences in teaching were implemented to indicate the specific implications as to how policy-based the art activities led differentiated and citizen-oriented educational activity successfully.

4. Case Analysis

4.1. Preparatory Stage: Beginning of the Education Program

In the late 1980s when the Seoul Arts Center opened, the South Korean art market was in a very poor state with very litte infrastructure and few programs that enabled one to view performances or exhibitions. Moreover, at the time of national development, citizens had poor awareness of culture and art consumption. The opening of the Seoul Arts Center in 1988 had a significant impact on cultural welfare policies in South Korea. At its initial stage characterized by concentration of various performances, the Seoul Arts Center focused on its role as a performance hall rather than as a culture and art complex, which was the goal of its establishment. For this reason, it has obtained the remarkable, general image of “music and performance hall” for Seoul citizens as the largest performance hall representing the city. However, the Seoul Arts Center is an institution for implementing culture and art policies that represent the country beyond the city of Seoul and has taken charge of culture and art education, as well as programs as the exhibition and support of expert cultivation.
The first education program, Calligraphy Academy, started in October 1988. The class opened with the goal of the national cultural welfare policies to spread the traditional cultural art of South Korea, calligraphy, across the civil society and cultivate professional calligraphers [26]. In the 1980s, Seoul was characterized by its strong aspiration to economic and social development and by its poor awareness of cultural welfare, little knowledge or concern about culture and art consumption among citizens, and delivery of state-led types of education rather than the culture and art education required by citizens. Nevertheless, the art education programs initiated by the Seoul Arts Center were successfully run.
“The calligraphy class run by the academy for ten years between 1988 and 1998 gained greater popularity than expected, though it was an education program based on the national cultural welfare policy package. It gave chances to identify the needs for culture and art education among citizens and played a crucial role as a ground for the Seoul Arts Center academy to run various art education programs in addition to calligraphy.”
Seong Hyo-gyeong, Dept. of Academy Programs
From its beginning, the Calligraphy Academy was composed of theoretical and practical programs so that individuals in every bracket, including professionals and the people in general, could enjoy it. Moreover, as master calligraphers representing South Korea were invited as instructors, it was recognized as the only institution offering a calligraphy course in South Korea, which was also developed steadily. Both goals of increasing the population of calligraphers and cultivating experts were achieved until it was established as the most typical course in charge of traditional art education in South Korea while there was no other calligraphy education center. In 1998, it grew to have 643 students in a total of 31 classes and provided more systematic education by operating various major classes on calligraphy, which involved such topics as the Korean alphabet and ancient, semi-cursive, and printed style of writing, and the Four Gracious Plants and seal engraving, in basic, intermediate, and advanced courses. Another effort has been made to expand service by permitting free exhibition viewing and by holding artwork-evaluating exhibitions together with the Seoul Calligraphy Art Museum (see Figure 1).
On the basis of the success in the calligraphy academy, the Art Academy opened in 1991. The Art Academy aimed to “improve the fundamental environment for improving and sustaining knowledge among art lovers” in pursuit of the increase in art enjoyment among citizens in general rather than of expert cultivation. Diverse programs, including art history and art appreciation, as well as art practice, were provided to get education according to concerns. In particular, the practical education program received fervent responses that 60 classes accommodated 2401 persons in 1998.
Citizens’ participation and its sustained growth have expanded the Art Academy into the course targeting adolescents and children, as well as adults, since the 2000s. In particular, diverse programs were given for the purpose of cultivating art students and widening the base of art education for children; of these, the program of Kim Heung-su’s Gifted Art Class gained great popularity, and the Seoul Arts Center Art Academy has played a crucial role in improving art exhibition viewing and artistic grounding, as well as in addressing concerns about art education for children in the entire society of Seoul.

4.2. Booster Stage: Expanding of the Education

The Seoul Arts Center academy, which had grown around a certain area of visual art education, received an opportunity for full-fledged growth as the Seoul Arts Center went through an organizational shift from being a foundation to a corporation and assuming a special status in 2000. The shift to a corporation obtaining a special status has enabled its independent and autonomous operation and expanded the education programs desired by the citizens in Seoul. It has developed various styles and types of education to meet the artistic tastes, emotions, and needs of the citizens in addition to culture and art education based on the national welfare policy package.
As the first attempt to develop a potential group of customers, it expanded culture and art education programs for children and adolescents. Since its opening in 1999, the Music Gifted Academy has made the subjects of sight-singing and ear-training necessary for musical basis, as well as major lessons to about 160 elementary school children selected through an open audition on an annual basis. Because sight-singing and ear-training were limited by the education chance affected by school education or personal lesson, the Music Gifted Academy has provided the education course for elementary school children to cultivate their musical capabilities and find out gifted ones. It has given chances to make the importance of music education known to many school institutions and parents, contributing to the expansion of art and culture cultivation through music appreciation and the young students’ experiences onstage (see Figure 2).
In 2002, a music appreciation course for adults opened. A long-term curriculum was composed of two semesters over a year to make up for the weaknesses of the existing short-term curriculums based on the delivery of fragmentary knowledge or episode-centered special lectures. The subjects varied by days of the week, providing diverse genres, such as Western music history, operas and ballet, and world music; in particular, composite lectures were given by means of up-to-date audio and video systems that allow them to appreciate the good images and sounds most necessary for the course of appreciation and to listen to an expert’s explanation. The music appreciation education in the Seoul Arts Center has been recognized as the highest-level curriculum that represents South Korea and has gained popularity among the citizens.
“While we maintained the existing program, the academy was widely known to the outside, attracting more trainees. Even then, general people thought that the Seoul Arts Center only gave performances and exhibitions. They expected that they could view concerts and exhibitions but could not do any other activity in the Seoul Arts Center. So we gave PRs earnestly, explained performances and exhibitions, and could give customers the needs for learning necessary to enjoy desired art while having fundamental study.”
Park Hye-suk, Head of the Dept. of Academy Programs
The new curriculums received fervent responses that they had attracted 44% of all the trainees since 2006. From then on, they recorded an annual earning rate of about 112% with the opening of such courses as “humanities” and “performance appreciation.” This successful result and implementations of Seoul Arts Center academy has introduced as a cultural education management model based on the art activities to many public art centers in South Korea.
Ultimately, this success has suggested the need to provide education necessitated by citizens and develop new education programs that meet the trend for the purpose of art education programs. In particular the academy developed a customer service team to provide the high-quality education contents and sensory and emotional education environment.
“I think the trend has exerted the strongest impact on the academy. What was important was to continuously consider how trend changed, what programs needed to be built to meet the trend, and what trainees needed.”
Hwang Bok-hi, Department Manager of Academy Programs
In particular, as performing arts in addition to music had gained popularity within the cultural industry since 2010, the academy also established the Performance Planning Academy. As a total of 29 courses opened, starting with “performance appreciation,” nearly 1700 citizens took a course; subsequently, professional programs with a mix of theoretical and practical courses, which involved on-site practice in performance-making, performance management laws, celebrities’ special lectures, and performance planning marketing, began to be provided on the basis of performance by reflecting trainees’ needs and the socio-cultural trend. With the national growth of South Korea, especially with the development of Seoul, and the citizens’ higher level of knowledge and cultural and artistic grounding, the curriculums provided by the Seoul Arts Center academy also gave chances to improve contents and expertise.

4.3. Settlement Stage: Developing the Education System

With the stable growth of the education programs in the Seoul Arts Center academy since 2012, the culture and art education programs have served as the refining ground for knowledge, experience, and creativity among citizens and for rendering culture and art prevalent in the entire society by reflecting customer service beyond the level of cultural welfare. The Seoul Arts Center has been set up as a symbol of art education as well as a space for experience and healing, not as an existing image of a music and performance hall.
Seemingly reflecting such accomplishment, the Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism and the Ministry of Employment and Labor have entrusted the operation of the Culture and Art Expert Academy, an education program based on national expenditure, to the Seoul Arts Center. According to a request by Seoul City to expand the humanities courses, the independent Humanities Academy was established to provide participation-centered education programs, such as field trips and actual performance viewing. The independent Art Academy for Adults was built with a subdivision of art education for adults in several types of occupation, as well as for the employed by establishing nighttime courses to meet the needs for participation and to cater to about 1445 persons in approximately 74 classes currently providing the courses. Moreover, the art academy started to provide personal working space through the Artist Studio and associate with the program of cultivating artists while also operating programs for children, including offering an Art Course for Children, Art Gifted Course, and Courses for Multicultural Children. In particular, the Calligraphy Academy that started the Seoul Arts Center academy included a new class of calligraphy with applied courses of the Korean alphabet, which can be used in real life, in order to celebrate the 25th anniversary of its opening.
To reflect the socio-cultural trend emphasizing the need for character education in adolescence, it also opened the Art Healing Academy for adolescents and provided culture and art curriculums to cultivate a character grounding, as well as psychological counseling through healing program experts, in such fields as music, art, drama, and dance. As shown in Figure 3, it added the Acting Course to the existing class based on appreciation, practice, and lecture so that people could have the necessary healing. Further, it opened the Good Parent Academy in pursuit of culture and art education closely related to living. To cover every genre of culture and art in pursuit of higher quality of life for all the generations, the Seoul Arts Center academy has been instituted as a cultural complex that represents Seoul, taking charge of culture and art education for the citizens.
In addition, it provides innovative education service in terms of content and develops academy customer service in pursuit of customer satisfaction on a steady basis. For example, it operates individual academy programs in an integrative way and provides convergent educational service to meet the greater needs of citizens for culture and art consumption, which involves music, art, performance, and exhibitions. It also gives PRs or events to attract more positive participation and interest in educational programs and pursues active communication so that citizens can share a great deal of information about culture, art education, and art experiences. To do this, it expands its online marketing channels, including blogs and SNSs to meet the changes in the current environment, and it makes mobile-based teaching materials, developing instruction tools based on up-to-date technology that meets the customers’ needs steadily.
“When the class ends in each term, we conduct a survey on satisfaction with the program. We continue to improve programs on the basis of the details, including the contents of the class, instructor assessment, and evaluation of those in charge, which trainees feel. The programs that have long maintained the best quality and the good subsidiary facilities of the Seoul Arts Center make trainees very satisfied. The academy, whose consumption brackets are subdivided with time and that develops an education program with differentiated goals for customers, is making more efforts to render culture and art education routine and substantial and to provide customized education with the goal of ‘providing a customized education program by life cycle.’”
Hwang Bok-hi, department manager of Academy Programs
Ultimately, it is evaluated that through a special culture and art education institution, the academy is able to provide high-level culture and art classes to citizens in Seoul and is particularly viewed by them as a representative institution that provides invaluable lessons to various age groups and generations, ranging from young children and senior citizens and across different segments of society, using culture and art education.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

Cultural welfare is characterized by cultural policies centered on those enjoying it to improve people’s quality of life. Cultural welfare policies aim to induce social integration and to train citizens by allowing the whole nation, as well as the socially underprivileged bracket, to experience cultural enjoyment and participation by cultivating cultural emotionality and creativity. In various aspects, including support of culture and art programs, the establishment of cultural welfare delivery systems, the cultivation of professional manpower, and the creation of the cultural environment and culture and art education for general citizens are crucial because they can improve awareness of culture and art across society, and allow citizens to cultivate their cultural consciousness (Gardner 1988). In this respect, the case of the Seoul Arts Center academy is significant in that it shows a successful case of citizen-centered cultural welfare policies that induce healthy leisure culture, character education, and community harmony for citizens on the basis of cultural welfare policies in South Korea. Through the case of the Seoul Arts Center academy, the implications can be reviewed in three aspects: first, the Seoul Arts Center academy is significant in that it started providing civil culture and art education when there were few cultural and artistic welfare activities; second, it has become the hub of public education centers representing South Korea; and third, it allowed the expansion of culture and art education all over the country beyond Seoul. Civil culture and art education can positively affect citizens’ life and social activity through artistic activity (Baldock 1999) and create immense contributions to social and cultural improvement and the growth of human resources (Garcia 2004). In this respect, it is confirmed that the activities of the academy contribute to social development, as well as to the development of cultural and artistic welfare policies in Seoul; therefore, culture and art education can be positively used to promote community and civil activities.
Second, the Seoul Arts Center academy shows the need of citizen-led education management. As the paradigm of the social welfare policies has shifted, cultural welfare also needs to reflect civil needs that provide a type of education desired by citizens instead of policy-based and administrative positions that simply provide education (Gohari et al. 2019). To do this, the Seoul Arts Center academy has listened civil opinions steadily and designed new education programs by reflecting them. On such a basis, it was able to develop innovative programs, including convergent or participatory education programs based on the combination of several fields, and to be recognized as an institution providing professional, high-level culture, and art education. It is ultimately necessary to operate citizen-centered policies for cultural welfare as well. To do this, it is necessary to create a practical plan, taking into such aspects as account lifestyle, association with communities, and cultural diversity.
Third, it is implied that culture and art education play a crucial role in the expansion of cultural welfare and consumption. The Seoul Arts Center academy has tried to provide education through the combination of culture and art on the basis of many different social problems, including suicide in adolescence, cultural approach in the underprivileged bracket, and solution to family problems, consequently contributing to a social culture of healing and harmony (Kim 2017). Moreover, it has provided every type of education to every civil class in every generation and confirmed the importance of culture and art for social integration. Cultural consumption needs to be popular out of the past paradigm that provided it exclusively for the upper class pursuing high culture. An approach can be made to solutions through culture and art in the aspect of social problems caused by social fluctuation, as well as the underprivileged bracket (Kim 2018). In this respect, the development of culture education on the arts can be considered as education and as part of the strategy for reinforcing social welfare.
Lastly, it is necessary to change teaching styles to reconcile the changes in culture and art with the changes of the times. Most of all, the Seoul Arts Center academy has been aware of the importance of education based on active experience, not simply on information delivery, with the higher level of knowledge among citizens, accepted the education positively, and expanded experiential classes. It has used the advanced educational environment and tools, including stereophonic sound and laser drawing, in order to resolve the shift to digital culture and art and the drastic improvement necessitated in the technical environment. In this respect, consideration should be given to the design and strategy for education based on citizens’ personal experiences, as well as for education based on the characteristics of culture and art that is sensitive to the changes in the environment of the times.
Nevertheless, this case study has a limitation: the contents of case analysis aimed at improving cultural welfare cannot be generalized into the roles of culture and art education institutions. It is necessary to present a common strategy and action plan for culture and art education to promote cultural welfare through the comparative analysis of some cases related to international culture education institutions and cultural welfare of many countries. Because the Seoul Arts Center academy was analyzed in terms of organizational activity according to Lewin’s three-stage course of change management, this study has failed to contain every detail of culture and art in the analysis contents during this process. It is necessary to analyze the educational characteristics of the academy on the basis of the theoretical background for culture and art and welfare policies. In addition, because the case analysis focused on the academy in terms of activity, this study gave no consideration to any phenomenon in the user’s position while experiencing academy education. It is therefore necessary to conduct empirical research on the effectiveness of cultural welfare policies and the effects of culture and art education on the basis of citizens’ educational experiences.

Author Contributions

Data curation, W.S.; Formal analysis, B.K.; Methodology, B.K.; Supervision, B.K.; Writing—original draft, W.S. and B.K.; Writing—review & editing, W.S.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andreasen, Alan R. 1991. Expanding the Audience for the Performing Arts. Washington: Seven Locks Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baek, Won-Young, and Joon-Mo Cho. 2018. Identifying the Virtuous Circle of Humanity Education and Post-Graduate Employment: Evidence from a Confucian Country. Sustainability 10: 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Baldock, John. 1999. Culture: The Missing Variable in Understanding Social Policy. Social Policy Administration 33: 458–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bent-Goodley, Tricia B. 2005. Culture and Domestic Violence: Transforming Knowledge Development. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 20: 425–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bianchini, France, and Parkinson Michael. 1993. Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: The Western European Experience. Manchester: Manchester University Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cha, Bo Hyun. 2006. A Study on the Reorganization and Development Issue of Social Welfare Delivery System. Journal of Public Welfare Administration 16: 2572–86. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cho, Hee-Yeon. 2011. La Politique D’education Artistique et Culturelle en France en Tant Qu’education Publique. Korean Journal of Arts Education 9: 41–56. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cummings, Thomas C., and Christopher G. Worley. 2005. Organization Development and Change. Mason: South-Western College Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cutler, Tony, and Barbara Waine. 1994. Managing the Welfare State: The Politics of Public Sector Management. Oxford: Berg Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  10. Da Silva, Diogo Soares, Lummina G. Horlings, and Elisabete Figueiredo. 2018. Citizen Initiatives in the Post-Welfare State. Social Sciences 7: 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dingil, Ali Enes, Federico Rupi, Joerg Schweizer, Zaneta Stasiskiene, and Kasra Aalipour. 2019. The Role of Culture in Urban Travel Patterns: Quantitative Analyses of Urban Areas Based on Hofstede’s Culture Dimensions. Social Sciences 8: 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Effinger, Brigit Pfau. 2005. Culture and Welfare State Policies: Reflections on a Complex. Interrelation Journal of Social Policy 34: 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Eisner, Elliot W. 2000. Arts Education Policy? Arts Education Policy Review 101: 4–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Garcia, Beatriz. 2004. Cultural policy and urban regeneration in Western European cites: Lessons from experience, prospects for the future. The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 19: 312–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gardner, Howard. 1988. Toward more effective arts education. Journal of Aesthetic Education 22: 157–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gates, Bruce L. 1980. Social Program Administration: The Implementation of Social Policy. Englewood: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  17. Geyer, Robert. 1998. Globalization and the (Non-) defence of the Welfare State. West European Politics 21: 77–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gitomer, Drew, Scott Grosh, and Karen Price. 1992. Portfolio culture in arts education. Art Education 45: 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gohari, Savis, Tor Medalen, and Rolee Aranya. 2019. Exploring the Impact of Complex Multi-Level Governance Structures on the Societal Contribution of Universities to Knowledge-Based Urban Development. Social Sciences. 8: 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Haylett, Chris. 2003. Culture, Class and Urban Policy: Reconsidering Equality. A Radical Journal of Geography 35: 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huber, Ludwig. 1990. Disciplinary Cultures and Social Reproduction. European Journal of Education 25: 241–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hyun, Eun-Ryung. 2012. A Case Study on Art and Culture Education for Social Expansion. The Korean Society of Science & Art 10: 257–67. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jang, Gun-Joo. 2019. Future Directions of Art Education for the Future Society. Korean Journal of Arts Education 17: 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jeon, Gyong-Ran. 2017. A Study of Academic Research Trend on Arts and Cultural Education. The Journal of Cultural Policy 31: 76–96. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jung, Yeon-Hee. 2008. Comparative Analysis of Arts and Cultural Education Policy between Korea and Austria. Journal of Research in Art Education 12: 141–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kendall, Jeremy, Martin Knapp, and Julien Forder. 2006. Social care and the nonprofit sector in the western developed world. In The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim, Seong-Hee. 2010. Expanding Art Education: Studies on the Impact of Purchase Motivation and Barrier Factors on Purchas Types. Korean Journal of Arts Education 8: 113–28. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, Mi-Sook. 2012. A Prospect on Concept Mapping for Learning of Music Elements. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education 41: 67–100. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, Chang-Wook. 2017. The Political Subjectivization of Korean Creative Workers: Working and Living as Urban Precariat in Creative City. Seoul International Journal of Cultural Policy 23: 701–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, Dong-Il. 2018. Designing a Course on Art and Culture aiming at Reinforcing Participation and Experience of Students with non-Specialty in Art and Culture. Thinking and Expression 12: 67–98. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee, Jong-Won. 2009. Functional Reorganizing Korea Arts and Culture Education Service Organization. Journal of Government and Policy 1: 145–65. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, Mi-Kyoung, Marko Majer, and Bo-Young Kim. 2019. The Social Welfare Service Delivery System to Reinforce Sustainable Social Participation. Social Sciences 8: 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lewin, Kurt. 1951. Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harpers. [Google Scholar]
  34. McGuigan, Jim. 2005. Neo-Liberalism, Culture and policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy 11: 229–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism. 2018. Report on Cultural Enjoyment; Sejong City: Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism.
  36. Mora, Higinio, Raquel Pérez-delHoyo, José F. Paredes-Pérez, and Rafael A. Mollá-Sirvent. 2018. Analysis oSocial Networking Service Data for Smart Urban Planning. Sustainability 10: 4732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Morgan, David L. 1993. Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research 3: 112–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Muller, Detlef K., Fritz Ringer, and Brian Simon. 1988. The Rise of the Modern Educational System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  39. Parc, Jimmyn, and Hwy-Chang Moon. 2019. Accumulated and Accumulable Cultures: A Case of Public and Private Initiatives Toward K-POP. Kritika Kultura 32: 429–52. [Google Scholar]
  40. Parsons, Talcott. 1977. The Problem of Order in Society, and the Program of an Analytical Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 83: 320–39. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pusztai, Gabriella, and Zsófia Kocsis. 2019. Combining and Balancing Work and Study on the Eastern Border of Europe. Social Sciences 8: 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ricardo, Ronald J. 1995. Overcoming Resistance to Change. National Productivity Review 14: 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Serre, Delphine. 2017. Class and Gender Relations in the Welfare State: The Contradictory Dictates of the Norm of Female Autonomy. Social Sciences 6: 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Song, Mi-Sook, and Kyung-Eun Kim. 2013. A Study on Culture and Art Education Supporting Organizations. The Journal of Korean Dance 31: 77–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. The Seoul Arts Center. 2017. The Annual Report 2016–17. Seoul: The Seoul Arts Center. [Google Scholar]
  46. The Seoul Arts Center. 2018. The History for 30 Years of the Seoul Arts Center. Seoul: The Seoul Arts Center. [Google Scholar]
  47. van de Ven, Andrew H., and Marshall Scott Poole. 1995. Explaining Development and Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review 20: 510–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Van Oorschot, Wim. 2007. Culture and Social Policy: A Developing Field of Study. International Journal of Social Welfare 16: 129–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Winner, Ellen, and Lois Hetland. 2000. The Arts in Education: Evaluating the Evidence for a Causal Link. The Journal of Aesthetic Education 34: 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wiśniewska, Aleksandra, and Mikołaj Czajkowski. 2017. Designing a socially efficient cultural policy: The case of municipal theaters in Warsaw. Journal International Journal of Cultural Policy 23: 445–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, Euna. 2019. A Study on the Provision and Participation Patterns of Arts and Culture Education Program of Lifelong Education Institutions in Community. Korean Journal of Arts Education 17: 107–37. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yeates, Nicolas. 2001. Globalization and Social Policy. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  53. Yin, Robert K. 1981. The case study crisis: some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scene of calligraphy and art academy education.
Figure 1. Scene of calligraphy and art academy education.
Socsci 08 00322 g001
Figure 2. Scene of music appreciation class.
Figure 2. Scene of music appreciation class.
Socsci 08 00322 g002
Figure 3. Scene of art healing and arts education for adolescents.
Figure 3. Scene of art healing and arts education for adolescents.
Socsci 08 00322 g003
Back to TopTop