Next Article in Journal
Does Mothers’ Parental Leave Uptake Stimulate Continued Employment and Family Formation? Evidence for Belgium
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Circular Migration on FGM/C: Transnational Communities in Spain and The Gambia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Big Data and Human Resources Management: The Rise of Talent Analytics
Open AccessArticle

Insight or Intrusion? Correlating Routinely Collected Employee Data with Health Risk

Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2019, 8(10), 291;
Received: 26 August 2019 / Revised: 14 October 2019 / Accepted: 15 October 2019 / Published: 16 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Big Data and Employee Wellbeing)
The volume, variety and velocity of data available to companies about their employees is already significant and likely to increase. Employers hold data about employees that could be used to explore the relationship between workplace practice in their organisation and risks to employee health. However, there is significant uncertainty about whether employers subject to English law are permitted to use this data for this purpose, and even whether they may be under a legal obligation to do so. In this article, the question of whether employers are legally permitted or legally obliged to use employee data to identify associations between workplace practice and risk to employee health is answered through an analysis of two spheres of English Law: data protection law, and health and safety law. The authors establish a hypothetical case study concerning a company that wishes to use employee data in this way, to illuminate a set of detailed legal issues. In particular, the question of whether a reasonable and prudent employer is under an obligation under health and safety law to use the data and analytic tools at his or her disposal to assess risk and inform his or her actions is considered. Also addressed is the question of whether such processing would satisfy the data protection law principles of “lawful, fair, and transparent” processing and that of “purpose limitation”. A complex picture emerges. The analysis reveals that data protection legislation may not support a trend towards the re-use of employee data to enhance workplace health and safety; nor is there currently a clear mandate that responsible employers use data in this way. The line between useful insight into workplace practices and intrusion into employees’ privacy remains blurred. View Full-Text
Keywords: data protection; employee data; health and safety at work data protection; employee data; health and safety at work
MDPI and ACS Style

Taylor, M.J.; Prictor, M. Insight or Intrusion? Correlating Routinely Collected Employee Data with Health Risk. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 291.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop