Next Article in Journal
Parsing the Gulf between Africans and African Americans
Next Article in Special Issue
Negative Gender Ideologies and Gender-Science Stereotypes Are More Pervasive in Male-Dominated Academic Disciplines
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Trust, Commitment, and Openness on Research Project Performance: Case Study in a Research Institute
Previous Article in Special Issue
Strategic Self-Presentation of Women in STEM
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2018, 7(2), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7020023

Chilly Climates, Balancing Acts, and Shifting Pathways: What Happens to Women in STEM Doctoral Programs

1
Supportive Psychological Services, Scottsdale, 4300 N Miller Rd., 110-5, Scottsdale, AZ 85251, USA
2
Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University, PO Box 870811, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
3
Educational Leadership, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 5774, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA
4
Counseling Services, Arizona State University, PO Box 872104, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 December 2017 / Revised: 16 January 2018 / Accepted: 21 January 2018 / Published: 31 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Women in Male-Dominated Domains)
Full-Text   |   PDF [320 KB, uploaded 7 February 2018]

Abstract

Women in doctoral programs in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) leave without finishing at higher rates than men and, as with men, turn away from academic and research careers. This qualitative study examines the day-to-day influences on female doctoral students during their third or fourth year in physical science and engineering programs. Ethnographic cognitive interviewing and online incident reports document the specific experiences and reactions of 28 participants over a six-month period. The data were analyzed to identify key incidents, categories and recurring themes. Some incidents contributed to women’s growing sense of competence, recognition and identification of oneself as a scientist. Others fit a model of microaggressions and gender barriers in a predominantly masculine culture. Problems of work-life balance were demonstrated for some women. Incidents generated responses by some participants that they would disengage from a research-intensive career trajectory toward alternate career interests outside of academic research. The findings provide information about the lived experiences of women in doctoral programs and suggest that the metaphor of career pathways may be more useful than pipelines in explaining the direction of women who are advanced doctoral students in research-intensive fields. View Full-Text
Keywords: women; graduate students; science and engineering; STEM; gender inequity women; graduate students; science and engineering; STEM; gender inequity
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cabay, M.; Bernstein, B.L.; Rivers, M.; Fabert, N. Chilly Climates, Balancing Acts, and Shifting Pathways: What Happens to Women in STEM Doctoral Programs. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 23.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top