Next Article in Journal
Integrated Public Value Creation through Community Initiatives—Evidence from Dutch Water Management
Previous Article in Journal
Mining Corporations, Democratic Meddling, and Environmental Justice in South Africa
Previous Article in Special Issue
Social Solidarity, Collective Identity, Resilient Communities: Two Case Studies from the Rural U.S. and Uruguay
Article Menu

Article Versions

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Soc. Sci. 2018, 7(12), 260; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7120260

Towards a Framework for Building Community-University Resilience Research Agendas

1
Department of Political Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
2
Department of Geography, Environment & Geomatics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
3
Department of Sociology & Anthropology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
4
Community Engaged Scholarship Institute, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 1 November 2018 / Revised: 19 November 2018 / Accepted: 30 November 2018 / Published: 8 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Engaged Scholarship for Resilient Communities)
PDF [1054 KB, uploaded 8 December 2018]

Abstract

In this paper, we ask: “How can we scope multiyear, multiscalar community–university collaborations that draw on the university’s diverse resources and contribute to community resilience”? We approach this question by presenting the development and application of the Advancing Collaborative Transdisciplinary Scholarship Framework (the “ACTS Framework”) which we argue has been successful at helping us better understand, foster, and work towards communities’ resilience. The ACTS Framework, informed by our collective expertise in critical community-engaged scholarship (CES) and community resilience, contributes to knowledge and practice in critical CES, in particular by providing guidance for scoping and sustaining complex community–university collaborations. The structured yet iterative process involved in the framework development and application affirms and extends the work of other scholars interested in the links between CES and community resilience. Our contributions offer two other important practices—centring community concerns and facilitating cross-project collaboration—to critical CES knowledge and practice and highlight two promising practices of linking structures that facilitate community–university collaborations—specifically, a well-organized institutional memory and holding and bridging relationships.
Keywords: critical community-engaged scholarship; community–university collaborations; community resilience critical community-engaged scholarship; community–university collaborations; community resilience
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Levac, L.; Parizeau, K.; Varghese, J.; Morton, M.; Jackson, E.; Hawkins, L. Towards a Framework for Building Community-University Resilience Research Agendas. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 260.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top