Next Article in Journal
Method in the Madness: Hysteria and the Will to Power
Next Article in Special Issue
In Pursuit of Child and Family Well-Being: Initial Steps to Advocacy
Previous Article in Journal
Do Robots Need to Be Stereotyped? Technical Characteristics as a Moderator of Gender Stereotyping
Previous Article in Special Issue
U.S. Volunteering in the Aftermath of the Great Recession: Were African Americans a Significant Factor?
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2016, 5(3), 28;

Converging Urban Agendas: Toward Healthy and Sustainable Communities

Centre for Sustainable Community Development, School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Jerry D. Marx
Received: 21 December 2015 / Revised: 20 June 2016 / Accepted: 27 June 2016 / Published: 5 July 2016
Full-Text   |   PDF [584 KB, uploaded 5 July 2016]   |  


In light of recent developments such as the COP21 Paris climate agreement, the UN adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals for 2030, and the Habitat III Conference, there is increasing recognition of the role of human settlements as key components of both global challenges and global solutions. “Urban sustainability” under various names has matured over the last three decades not only in planning and related fields, but also in wider professional and popular discourse. In this paper we trace a historical overview of urban sustainability theory and practice, and explain why urban sustainability planning and development currently face limited and inconsistent application. We show that this lack of public uptake is due in part to monitoring, assessment, and decision-support frameworks and tools that do not engage citizens and their governments in a shared “strong sustainability” analysis and/or vision. We argue that urban sustainability today clearly needs to embrace equity, inclusion, and other social considerations; contribute to constructive societal mobilisation and compelling policy-making; advocate for development as a better alternative to growth; encourage the integration of human and environmental health interests; and encompass triple-bottom-line-inspired outcomes. Focusing on community capital productivity and regeneration may be the key to advancing healthy and sustainable communities. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban sustainability; sustainable community development; urban productivity; sustainability planning; sustainability frameworks urban sustainability; sustainable community development; urban productivity; sustainability planning; sustainability frameworks

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Roseland, M.; Spiliotopoulou, M. Converging Urban Agendas: Toward Healthy and Sustainable Communities. Soc. Sci. 2016, 5, 28.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top