Next Article in Journal
Once You Are In You Might Need to Get Out: Adaptation and Adaptability in Volatile Labor Markets—the Case of Musical Actors
Next Article in Special Issue
Performance of Survey Forecasts by Professional Analysts: Did the European Debt Crisis Make it Harder or Perhaps Even Easier?
Previous Article in Journal
Constructions of Resilience: Ethnoracial Diversity, Inequality, and Post-Katrina Recovery, the Case of New Orleans
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Eurozone Crisis: Muddling through on the Way to a More Perfect Euro Union?
 
 
Correction published on 27 March 2014, see Soc. Sci. 2014, 3(2), 193.
Article

Debt Contagion in Europe: A Panel-Vector Autoregressive (VAR) Analysis

1
Economics Department, Sonoma State University, 1801 E. Cotati Avenue, Rohnert Park, CA 94928, USA
2
Economics Department, US Naval Academy, 12 Blake Road, Annapolis, MD 21402, USA
3
Economics Department, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, CA 95211, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2013, 2(4), 318-340; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci2040318
Received: 23 September 2013 / Revised: 21 November 2013 / Accepted: 9 December 2013 / Published: 18 December 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Eurozone Crisis: A Multidisciplinary Perspective)
The European sovereign-debt crisis began in Greece when the government announced in December, 2009, that its debt reached 121% of GDP (or 300 billion euros) and its 2009 budget deficit was 12.7% of GDP, four times the level allowed by the Maastricht Treaty. The Greek crisis soon spread to other Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) countries, notably Ireland, Portugal, Spain and Italy. Using quarterly data for the 2000–2011 period, we implement a panel-vector autoregressive (PVAR) model for 11 EMU countries to examine the extent to which a rise in a country’s bond-yield spread or debt-to-GDP ratio affects another EMU countries’ fiscal and macroeconomic outcomes. To distinguish between interdependence and contagion among EMU countries, we compare results obtained for the pre-crisis period (2000–2007) with the crisis period (2008–2011) and control for global risk aversion. View Full-Text
Keywords: Panel VAR; sovereign debt crisis; euro area; contagion Panel VAR; sovereign debt crisis; euro area; contagion
Show Figures

Figure 1

  • Correction

    Correction (PDF, 16 KiB)

    A correction was published on 27 March 2014 (https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/3/2/193)

MDPI and ACS Style

Bouvet, F.; Brady, R.; King, S. Debt Contagion in Europe: A Panel-Vector Autoregressive (VAR) Analysis. Soc. Sci. 2013, 2, 318-340. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci2040318

AMA Style

Bouvet F, Brady R, King S. Debt Contagion in Europe: A Panel-Vector Autoregressive (VAR) Analysis. Social Sciences. 2013; 2(4):318-340. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci2040318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bouvet, Florence, Ryan Brady, and Sharmila King. 2013. "Debt Contagion in Europe: A Panel-Vector Autoregressive (VAR) Analysis" Social Sciences 2, no. 4: 318-340. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci2040318

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop