Next Article in Journal
Enabling Artificial Intelligence Adoption through Assurance
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence in News Media of Two Competing Hypotheses about COVID-19 Origins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Working for the Welfare: Support and Supervision Needs of Indigenous Australian Child Protection Practitioners
Review

Are Working Children in Developing Countries Hidden Victims of Pandemics?

Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, 38333 Volos, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Gerald Cradock
Soc. Sci. 2021, 10(9), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10090321
Received: 19 July 2021 / Revised: 6 August 2021 / Accepted: 12 August 2021 / Published: 24 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Child Abuse and Child Protection)

Abstract

The consequences of the recent pandemic have been disproportionately disruptive to several social groups, including children. As developing economies have been firefighting the recent pandemic, the welfare of minors could be affected and children’s economic exploitation and abuse could increase. Therefore, the present research aims to shed light on and to investigate the association between child labour in developing countries and pandemics, including the coronavirus, through conducting a systematic literature review on previous empirical studies. The present research concludes that previous studies on non-COVID-19 pandemics have mainly focused on the African economies, while studies on the recent pandemic have focused on Asian countries. In addition, differences were observed in relation to the methodological approaches and the characteristics of minor employees and the protection services in certain countries have proven to be insufficient. Suggestions for future research and policy implications are presented.
Keywords: child labour; developing countries; pandemics; epidemics; COVID-19 child labour; developing countries; pandemics; epidemics; COVID-19

1. Introduction

Pandemics and health crises in developing countries have been the subject of several empirical and theoretical studies due to their socio-economic impact on household income and well-being (Asfaw and von Braun 2004; Wagstaff 2007; Gustafsson-Wright et al. 2011; Islam and Maitra 2012). Health crises also reverse socioeconomic development and affect the family system, mainly the well-being of young people (Taraphdar et al. 2011). It has been observed that they increase unemployment, influence family members’ responsibilities and have a negative impact on school attendance rates and the quality of education (Duryea et al. 2007; Fong and Iarocci 2020; Goulas and Megalokonomou 2020; Gupta and Jawanda 2020).
Previous studies have focused on the impact of pandemics and health crises on the welfare of children. Lockdowns during pandemics increase the reported cases of child abuse and neglect and the loss of parental support worldwide (Douglas et al. 2009; Jentsch and Schnock 2020; Rodriguez et al. 2021). Nevertheless, during pandemics, the social protection of children has been judged as inadequate, as in the case of the H1N1 flu (Douglas et al. 2009; Murray 2010). In general, pandemics create conditions under which the maltreatment, abuse and neglect of children are enabled (Rodriguez et al. 2021).
Similarly, the surge of the recent pandemic SARS-COV-2 (hereinafter COVID-19) threatened the health and well-being of several social groups worldwide, including children. COVID-19 is expected to have macroeconomic consequences, including higher poverty (e.g., Pak et al. 2020; Brum and De Rosa 2021; Gutiérrez-Romero and Ahamed 2021), higher unemployment rates in both developed and developing countries (e.g., Achdut and Refaeli 2020; Couch et al. 2020; Workie et al. 2020) and reduced household income (Ali et al. 2020; Kansiime et al. 2021). Consequently, it is likely that children’s welfare and human rights will be affected, as has been observed in previous health and social crises and in pandemics (Holmberg 2017; Shelley-Egan and Dratwa 2019; Rafferty 2020).
The COVID-19 pandemic has attracted research interest over the past few months that has mostly focused on its socio-economic consequences worldwide (Aneja and Ahuja 2020; Ali et al. 2020; Nicola et al. 2020). It has been estimated that COVID-19 will mainly affect the well-being of vulnerable groups, including children (Armitage and Nellums 2020). The UN Committee of the Rights of the Child highlighted the importance of investigating the impact of the recent pandemic on children’s human rights, including health issues, their well-being and development, as well as the problem of child labour (Campbell et al. 2021; Lee 2021). Therefore, the estimated effects of COVID-19 on child labour merit attention and this should be a top research priority considering the vulnerability of minors to child labour. In particular, according to Zahed et al. (2020) the case of children when investigating the consequences of COVID-19 is often neglected, even though they are a vulnerable social group. Apart from the psychological and physical consequences of COVID-19, the researchers concluded that working children are more susceptible to the infection and that the pandemic has increased poverty, which is a contributing factor to child labour.
The recent pandemic is expected to increase the risks for vulnerable social groups including children and it could lead to higher rates of child labour, exploitation, forced labour and slavery (Ahad et al. 2020; Rafferty 2020; Raman et al. 2020). These findings are in line with Gupta and Jawanda (2020), who argued that the pandemic will increase economic insecurity and child exploitation, including child labour, mainly in poor regions. Similarly, the pandemic is expected to lead to an economic crisis and to increase child poverty, which is a determinant of child labour (Goldman et al. 2020; Van Lancker and Parolin 2020). Ghosh et al. (2020a) also argued that the recent pandemic has had a significant psychological impact on children. According to the researchers, COVID-19 is expected to increase child abuse and domestic violence, as well as child labour and exploitation.
Over the past decades, several international organizations (e.g., the International Labour Organization (ILO)’s International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour, the UNICEF Office of Research-Innocenti, the ILO’s Asia Regional Child Labour Programme) and non-governmental organizations (e.g., Save the Children, Love 146, the HAQ Centre for Child Rights, the International Initiative to End Child Labor, Plan International, World Vision etc.) have made significant efforts towards the reduction in child labour rates in developing countries. It has been argued that over the past decades the rates of child labour were controlled due to several economic policies that set commitments for poverty eradication, educational opportunities and the elimination of child labour, according to the first Millenium Development Goal (MDGs) (Leinberger-Jabari et al. 2005; Haines et al. 2007; Rena 2009). Nevertheless, it has been predicted that the pandemic and the health measures will lead to an economic recession, limited demand for consumer goods, higher unemployment, reduced household income and cross—border remittances (Ahad et al. 2020; Nicola et al. 2020).
The impact of previous pandemics (e.g., Ebola, SARS, HIV/AIDS, H1N1, Influenza) on the well-being of minors has been the subject of previous studies (Holmberg 2017; Shelley-Egan and Dratwa 2019). Nevertheless, the economic exploitation of children during health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, remains under investigated. Therefore, the present paper represents the first effort to conduct an extended literature review on empirical papers that have studied the association between pandemics and child labour in developing countries, including the COVID-19 pandemic.
The paper is structured as follows: In Section 2 the issue of child labour is briefly defined and the principal reasons for this phenomenon are mentioned. The following sections present the findings of previous studies. In particular, in Section 3 the findings of the literature review on child labour and pandemics are presented and discussed, focusing on developing countries, while Section 3 is limited to the association between COVID-19 and working children. The paper concludes with suggestions and policy implications. The limitations of the present study are also presented in Section 6.

2. Rationale and Contribution of the Study

This research focused on low- and middle- income economies (for brevity developing countries) and argues that they are characterised by overpopulation and inadequate health systems which renders these economies more vulnerable to economic and social shocks, such as the recent health crisis (Bong et al. 2020). In particular, less developed countries have insufficient health care services, including limited health personnel and protection equipment (Bong et al. 2020; Sharfuddin 2020), high poverty rates and limited public expenditure on health and access to social amenities (Ataguba and Ataguba 2020). Moreover, population density in developing countries rendered social distancing impossible during the COVID-19 pandemic (Bong et al. 2020; Bortz et al. 2020), while several developing economies have a large labour force, including minor employees (Sharfuddin 2020).
Furthermore, the case of children, not to mention working ones, was chosen and it is argued that they are vulnerable social groups. Sserwanja et al. (2021) observed that limited attention has been paid to children’s health during the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly in developing economies. Therefore, the welfare of children during the recent pandemic should be a subject of research interest, as COVID-19 could lead to an increase in the abuse, exploitation and maltreatment of children and violent incidents (Kechagia and Metaxas 2018; Brown et al. 2020; Fong and Iarocci 2020; Raman et al. 2020; Wu and Xu 2020; Sserwanja et al. 2021). Compared to other employed groups, working children are at an increased risk of several infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS and various types of hepatitis (Roggero et al. 2007; Naemabadi et al. 2019) and to respiratory mobilities (Tiwary et al. 2009; Awan et al. 2010; Romero et al. 2010; Shendell et al. 2016) due to a lack of training.
According to Daly et al. (2020) there has been minimal research on child labour and COVID-19 that has focused on the case of migrant employees. It is noted that Gupta and Jawanda (2020) studied the potential consequences of the pandemic on children’s well-being and everyday life, while Zahed et al. (2020) investigated the association between COVID-19 and child labour in general; on the contrary, the present research focuses on developing economies. Similarly, Roberton et al. (2020) investigated the indirect effects of the pandemic on children in developing countries but focused solely on the mortality rates. Therefore, previous studies have focused on the other ways in which COVID-19 affected children (e.g., mortality rates, everyday life etc.). On the contrary, the present research is the first systematic review to investigate the impact of previous pandemics and COVID-19 on child labour.

3. Definition of Child Labour

The past decades have witnessed various efforts by international and local organizations in the fight against the phenomenon of child labour. The present research focuses on minor employees in developing countries and argues that they have higher rates of child labour (Scanlon et al. 2002), including contributing family workers (Diallo et al. 2013). Child labour includes the violation of the human rights of minors and it is associated with various harmful activities (Edmonds and Pavcnik 2005). Several definitions of child labour have been presented to date, ranging from wage work for minors (Psacharopoulos 1997) and various forms of market work (Ray and Lancaster 2005) to domestic activities (Basu et al. 2010; Assaad et al. 2010). These findings are in line with Levison and Moe (1998) and Webbink et al. (2012), who also defined domestic activities as a “hidden” form of child labour. According to Basu (1999), child labour could be either paid or not paid and it is associated with domestic activities.
Similarly, according to the ILO/IPEC (2021), child labour should not be confused with child work. In particular, child labour includes activities that deprive minors of their childhood, potential and dignity and could negatively affect their mental and physical development; it is therefore harmful to minors. Based on the ILO Minimum Age Convention (ILO 1973, No. 138), minors should be older than 15 to legally participate in the labour force (ILO 1973). UNICEF has further extended the above presented definitions and focuses on the importance of both domestic and economic work. In particular, child labour refers to minors aged 5–11 engaged in any economic activity or at least 28 h of domestic activities, minors aged 12–14 engaged in any economic activity, excluding light work for no more than 14 h weekly and minors aged 15–16 engaged in any hazardous work (UNICEF 2007). Therefore, it is concluded that there is no single universally accepted definition of the phenomenon. Finally, the ILO/IPEC (2021) observed that in order to define “work” as child labour several factors should be considered, including the age, the hours and the type of work, the working conditions and the objectives.
Several international organizations provide country-level data on child labour, including the ILO, the World Bank, the United Nations and UNICEF, as well as child labour indicators (e.g., ILO’s indicator on the Proportion and Number of Children aged 5–17 years engaged in Child Labour, UNICEF’s indicator on the Percentage of Children aged 5–17 years engaged in Child Labour etc.), while certain previous studies have used the secondary school non-enrollment rates as a proxy for child labour (Kucera 2002; Busse and Braun 2004; Braun 2006; Beegle et al. 2009), although several minor employees go to school and it is argued that school enrolment and child labour are not incompatible activities; therefore, combining child labour and school enrolment is feasible but difficult (Ravallion and Wodon 2000; Attanasio et al. 2010; Edmonds and Shrestha 2014).
Poverty has been proven to be the main cause of child labour (Admassie 2002; Basu 2002; Jafarey and Lahiri 2002; Kim 2009; Rena 2009) and poor children are often forced to stop school and start working (Admassie 2002; Shafiq 2007; Sasmal and Guillen 2015; Rena 2009). It has been suggested that even in the case that schools re-open after the lockdown, several parents would probably be incapable of paying for schooling, mainly in rural areas (Kluttz 2015). In developing countries, poor children are rarely paid for their work, while others are engaged in rural activities by their parents to contribute to the family income (Fetuga et al. 2005; Chaudhuri 2011).
As a consequence, minors are at higher risk of sexual exploitation, trafficking and victimization (Scanlon et al. 2002; Edmonds and Pavcnik 2005; Chaudhuri and Dwibedi 2016; Greenbaum and Bodrick 2017; Ahad et al. 2021), increased rates of mortality and occupational injuries (Roggero et al. 2007; Schlick et al. 2014; Shendell et al. 2016). In several developing countries working children drop out of school (Shafiq 2007; Huisman and Smits 2015) or show poor academic performance (Psacharopoulos 1997; Holgado et al. 2014; Putnick and Bornstein 2015; Kumar and Saqib 2017).
Finally, as for the regional distribution of child labour, according to the United Nations, rates are higher in the Sub-Saharan economies (Figure 1). The problem has been mainly attributed to high poverty rates in the region (Canagarajah and Nielsen 2001; Admassie 2002; Chukwudeh and Oduaran 2021), poor school quality (Ray 2002; Rena 2009) and social conditions in post-war African countries (Hilson 2010; Maconachie and Hilson 2016). Similarly, for the period 2010–2018, the Sub-Saharan African countries had the highest percentage of children aged 5–17 engaged in child labour, estimated at 29% (UNICEF 2019a).
The Latin American and the Caribbean countries rank second among the regions with higher child labour rates, which has also been attributed mostly to poverty (Sedlacek et al. 2009; Lieten 2011). Consequently, despite the regional prevalence of the phenomenon in Sub-Saharan Africa, there are economically active children in other geographic regions as well. Thus, the problem mostly affects the developing countries; however, it is not a matter of national or regional concern but a subject of international dialogue, most of all during global crises such as pandemics, which are investigated in the following section.

4. Studies on Child Labour and Previous Non-COVID-19 Pandemics in Developing Countries

Child labour is considered a visible and the most common form of child abuse and neglect in developing countries (Caesar-Leo 1999; Maruf et al. 2003; Mahmod et al. 2016) and based on the above, the present research focuses on the association between child labour and the pandemics in the developing countries, including the COVID-19 pandemic. In several developing countries, pandemics push minors into the labour markets (Grier 2004; Deb 2005). Therefore, an in-depth systematic literature review was conducted using reliable databases, (e.g., Sciencedirect, Scopus, Google Scholar, NCBI etc.). The key terms used during the research were “child labor”, “child labour”, “epidemic”, “pandemic”, as presented in Table 1. It is noted that scientific peer-journal articles were included that were published in English and that focused on developing countries, as well as reports from international organizations, such as the UNICEF, the ILO etc. Thus, books and conference proceedings were excluded.
The literature review revealed that there has been limited contemporary academic research on child labour and pandemics over the past decades, as presented in Table 2. For each study, the case study of the developing country and the pandemic is presented, as well as the methodological approach applied. Moreover, the main conclusions of the previous related studies are included in the following table.
It could be argued that previous pandemics in developing economies exacerbated the existing issues of child exploitation and labour, while gendered responsibilities were observed. Moreover, previous studies focused on paid child labour and it is argued that non-paid work could be characterised as invisible and difficult to estimate. Among the above presented studies, Sorsa and Abera (2016) were the first to study child labour and malaria as a type of pandemic. However, their study did not focus exclusively on the association between the two variables, but mainly on children that worked in regions in which malaria was endemic. Lugalla and Sigalla (2010) argued that in Tanzania there was little awareness of working children, mainly in rural areas. They suggested that the government and international organizations should cooperate to reduce rural poverty and therefore eliminate child labour.
Furthermore, among the included studies, it was observed that the African economies, in which child labour rates are high, have attracted increased research interest (Canagarajah and Nielsen 2001; Maconachie and Hilson 2016). According to the literature review findings, certain studies and reports (e.g., Save the Children/UNICEF/World Vision/Plan International 2015; Ngegba and Mansaray 2016; Yoder-van den Brink 2019; Smith 2020) studied the impact of pandemics on child labour in post -war countries, as in the case of Sierra Leone. It was concluded that pandemics could deter the so-called crisis of youth in Sierra Leone and it was argued that several minors end up in informal or unskilled labour (Peters 2011; Maconachie and Hilson 2016).
On the contrary, the Latin American and the Caribbean countries have attracted limited research interest, although they have insufficient social protections and high poverty rates, which result in increased child labour incidents (Sedlacek et al. 2009; Lieten 2011). Several previous studies have focused on child labour in the Latin American and the Caribbean economies as a whole (Sedlacek et al. 2009; Lieten 2011; Silva et al. 2019) and in specific cases of countries (Psacharopoulos 1997; Kea 2007; Zapata et al. 2011), while Mora-Garcia (2018) focused on Costa Rica and concluded that child labour in the agricultural sector diplaced schooling.
To summarise, there is evidence to support the claim that there is an important research gap on child labour in Latin America during pandemics, which should be confronted since minor employees remain a major social issue in the region. It is interesting that several Latin American countries were affected by pandemics over the past decades, including the outbreak of cholera in the ‘90s (Kumate et al. 1998; Poirier et al. 2012), which affected other countries with high rates of child labour, such as Brazil, Bolivia and Venezuela (Psacharopoulos 1997; Silva et al. 2019; Costa et al. 2020). Therefore, the present study concludes that there is a research gap regarding child labour and pandemics in the region.

5. Studies on COVID-19 and Child Labour in Developing Countries

Based on the above presented procedure, the additional terms “COVID-19” and “SARS-COV-2” were included as keywords. Therefore, the keywords used in this analysis were: “child labor”, “child labour”, “epidemic”, “pandemic”, “COVID-19” and “SARS-COV-2”. The results of the final search are presented in Table 3. It is noted that the included papers were based on secondary data and literature reviews.
The studies lead to the common argument that the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to lead to an employment crisis in developing countries, which will lead to higher percentages of child labour. As for the methodological approach, it was observed that all of the included papers were based on a literature review and on secondary data. Except for the study of Greenbaum et al. (2020), the researchers focused on the cases of specific countries rather than on a group of countries. The case of India was dominant and it has been studied by four researchers to date, who were motivated by the increased demand for cheap labour force in the country and high poverty rates in the country (Kaur and Byard 2021). On the contrary, Sserwanja et al. (2021) focused on the case of Uganda, which was motivated by the increase in children abuse incidents in the county during the pandemic.
In particular, the majority of the above presented studies turned their orientation towards child labour and COVID-19 in the Asian developing countries. Therefore, it is observed that to date there is no published research regarding the case of the Latin American and the Caribbean countries, while there is decreasing research interest in the African developing countries compared to previous pandemics and health crises. This could be attributed to the characteristics of several Asian countries that render children more vulnerable to the disease, including population density, poor health systems and insufficient testing, which led to research interest in COVID-19 and its consequences to the region (Sarkar et al. 2020; Stone 2020; Alam 2021).
On the contrary, even though Africa has similar characteristics to Asia, it has not been studied so far given that the onset of the COVID-19 was later and mortality and fatality rates were lower compared to other regions (Bamgboye et al. 2020; Makoni 2020). Thus, according to Ghosh et al. (2020b) there is an African paradox. Additionally, it is concluded that the Latin American countries, which are listed among the highly affected countries (Rivarola Puntigliano 2020), have not been the subject of recent research.
Another developing issue refers to the gender of the minor employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study concludes that the role of child labourers during the recent pandemic has not been the subject of research so far. Nevertheless, gender is listed among the determinants of child labour (Edmonds and Pavcnik 2005; Alam et al. 2015; Bérenger and Verdier-Chouchane 2016). Additionally, in developing economies, including the Asian countries presented above, gender inequality remains a pervasive problem (Stone 2020) and it could be exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic (Pinchoff et al. 2021).
Finally, the reports of international organizations on child labour and COVID-19 (e.g., ILO/UNICEF 2020; United Nations/DESA 2020; The World Bank Group 2020) reached the common conclusion that the current pandemic could reverse the positive trends and increase child labour worldwide. This rise is attributed to the disruption in supply chains and to higher commodity prices. School closures, dropout rates, limited employment opportunities, failing living standards and trading activity in the post-COVID-19 period are listed among the channels of child labour during the pandemic. It is noted that Ghosh et al. (2020a) also concluded that COVID-19 is expected to increase child labour; nevertheless, their research did not focus on developing countries and thus the study was excluded from the above presented table.

6. Discussion and Suggestions

The present research focused on the consequences of pandemics, including COVID-19, on child labour in developing countries. Developing countries were the subject of the research since they have several structural and social inequities. The pandemic is expected to have socio-economic and employment consequences that will greatly affect individuals’ well-being and lives, including minor employees. This research represents the first attempt to conduct a literature review on the association between pandemics and child labour in developing countries.
The findings of the literature review on pandemics highlighted their impact on child labour rates, among other increasing socio-economic issues. It is concluded that pandemics are associated with an increased demand for child labour, along with absenteeism and higher dropout rates (Gicharu et al. 2015; Ngegba and Mansaray 2016; The World Bank Group 2020). Similarly, it is anticipated that the COVID-19 pandemic could lead to human rights abuses, mainly in developing countries, as well as to social inequalities. The recent pandemic could lead to a sudden rise in the child labour rates in developing countries, wiping out previous efforts to combat the problem and to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals on forced labour, trafficking and child labour (Goal 8.7.).
The research on child labour and pandemics is ongoing and therefore there were limited studies related to the subject. Further research should be conducted and primary data should be collected. Additionally, the social consequences of the recent pandemic on minor employees and their caregivers could be compared to previous pandemics. However, the association between child labour and pandemics has been selected due to its importance. The study concludes that as for the relation between previous pandemics and child labour, it was observed that there was increased interest in the African countries (e.g., Nyambedha et al. 2003; Lugalla and Sigalla 2010; Evans 2012; Sorsa and Abera 2016), including the post-war economies (e.g., Save the Children/UNICEF/World Vision/Plan International 2015; Ngegba and Mansaray 2016; Yoder-van den Brink 2019; Smith 2020). On the contrary, the researchers who investigated the impact of COVID-19 on child labour mostly focused on the case of the Asian economies (e.g., Chopra 2020; Larmar et al. 2020; Ramaswamy and Seshadri 2020; Kaur and Byard 2021; Daly et al. 2021).
In addition, certain studies predicted psychosocial and mental health problems and concluded that pandemics affect children’s wellbeing (e.g., Ngegba and Mansaray 2016; Yoder-van den Brink 2019; Ramaswamy and Seshadri 2020), while others observed that pandemics could reduce school attendance and increase dropout rates (e.g., Gicharu et al. 2015; Smith 2020) and Yoder-van den Brink (2019) argued that school closures could increase child labour, focusing on Sierra Leone. Finally, insufficient protection services were observed in several developing countries and this was related to child labour (e.g., Chopra 2020; Kaur and Byard 2021). Finally, certain researchers have predicted that the recent pandemic could lead to children’s exploitation (e.g., Greenbaum et al. 2020; Nguyen et al. 2020) and increases in child labour due to high poverty rates (ILO/UNICEF 2020; Lugalla and Sigalla 2010; Ramaswamy and Seshadri 2020).
The included studies and reports were based on different methodological approaches, considering that the research on the recent pandemic is ongoing and that currently there is no published study that includes primary data. Studies on previous pandemics were based on both primary and secondary data, using a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Among them, certain studies (e.g., Sorsa and Abera 2016; Evans 2012; Ngegba and Mansaray 2016) collected primary data from focus groups, which could lead to inaccurate or biased results. It is noted that only the report presented by the Save the Children/UNICEF/World Vision/Plan International (2015) included a thematic content analysis, which was based on the capture of certain words and phrases; nevertheless, the phrases might not have captured the exact meaning of the answers. Questionnaires were used by certain researchers (Nyambedha et al. 2003; Gicharu et al. 2015) which provided wide coverage, compared to other research tools (e.g., observations, interviews etc.) and ensured greater validity and anonymity. As for the studies on the COVID-19 pandemic, as mentioned above, they were based on a literature review given that the investigation into the association between COVID-19 and child labour is ongoing and it is difficult to collect, elaborate and publish primary data on the subject at present.

6.1. Limitations

The study is subjected to certain limitations, which are mostly related to the issues that arise when investigating child labour. Firstly, one limitation refers to the number of the published papers on child labour and COVID-19, let alone in developing countries. Nevertheless, the paper focused on the specific issue motivated by the literature gap and the importance of child labour as a social phenomenon and COVID-19 as a global health crisis.
Secondly, it is difficult to estimate the hidden or non-paid work by minor employees, such as domestic activities, which are defined as a form of child labour (Levison and Moe 1998; Basu et al. 2010; Assaad et al. 2010; Webbink et al. 2012). Thirdly, only published scientific papers from different databases and reports from international organizations were selected and included. Therefore, dissertations and book chapters were excluded, as well as papers not published in English. Finally, another limitation of the research refers to the ethical dilemmas arising when investigating child labour. According to Daly et al. (2020) it is difficult to communicate with the families of minor employees; however, their study focused solely on minor employees in Nepal. On the contrary, Dammert and Galdo (2013) conducted large-scale research and observed that the survey design influences child labour statistics, which is in line with the findings of Dillon et al. (2012).

6.2. Suggestions for Future Research

Empirical and theoretical research on child labour should be a top priority among researchers of different fields. A literature gap was observed for the case of child labour in the Latin American and the Caribbean countries considering that the impact of health crises, including previous pandemics and COVID-19, has not been adequately studied. Therefore, it is concluded that the countries of the region should also be investigated to cover all geographic regions.
The literature review concluded that only the study of Abimanyi-Ochom et al. (2017) considered the impact of a pandemic on child work by gender using primary data and questionnaires. Therefore, gender could also be the subject of future studies, given that it is an important factor of child labour (Edmonds and Pavcnik 2005; Kea 2007; Bonke 2010; Putnick and Bornstein 2016). As for the recent pandemic, there are vague findings on the impact of COVID-19 on the everyday life of boys and girls. Certain studies concluded that COVID-19 was disproportionately affecting the quality of life and health status of adolescent girls (Pinchoff et al. 2020; Tamarit et al. 2020; Ravens-Sieberer et al. 2021), while other researchers did not observe significant differences between genders (De Matos et al. 2020; Wunsch et al. 2021). It is observed that these studies (e.g., Pinchoff et al. 2020; De Matos et al. 2020; Wunsch et al. 2021) focused on the impact of COVID-19 on quality of life of boys and girls, including mental health issues, social isolation etc.; therefore, the relationship between the recent pandemic and child labour in relation to gender remains a subject of future research.
In addition, future studies should also be oriented towards the investigation of children in the street during the pandemics, considering that the related literature remains relatively silent. Children in the street are vulnerable to exploitation and violence (Caesar-Leo 1999) and it would be interesting to investigate the impact of health crises in this specific sub-group. Similarly, the case of migrant children in developing countries is of increasing interest, as suggested by Daly et al. (2021).
Finally, the study focused on the impact of large health shocks on child labour arguing that they influence, among others, household income, insecurity, demand for a cheap labour force, migration and remittances, etc. Nevertheless, other large shocks could increase child labour. It is observed that armed conflicts and wars increase child labour (ILO 2010, 2011; Haer 2019; Naufal et al. 2019), as well as economic shocks (Beegle et al. 2003, 2006; Duryea et al. 2007; Dumas 2020), earthquakes and other natural disasters (Santos 2010; Vásquez and Bohara 2010) etc. Therefore, future studies could conduct a systematic review on the relationship between child labour and other forms of shocks (e.g., economic, social etc.).

6.3. Policy Implications

The study concluded that emergency actions should be taken in order to prevent child exploitation and to ensure that previous gains will not be lost. It is crucial to tackle child labour and to proceed to combined actions to protect children at risk of exploitation. The study highlights the importance of preventing child labour as a side effect of the pandemic and argues that it undermines the development of children and society.
Furthermore, the existing legal framework on child labour should be enforced and implemented worldwide. Policymakers should focus on the effectiveness of child protection services and on their role in preventing the exploitation and abuse of children. Among the studied economies, it is observed that India has inadequate protection services (Chopra 2020; Kaur and Byard 2021), while the social support in Uganda is insufficient, according to the findings of Sserwanja et al. (2021). Therefore, protection services should be improved through improving the recruitment and retention of employees, promoting cooperation among services and improving supervision (UNICEF 2019b).
Local authorities should cooperate with childcare institutions and international organizations to report violence against children and facilitate communication among children, police/non-government organizations and lawyers. According to the findings of Larmar et al. (2020) the cooperation between the involved parts could be strengthened via recovery programs based on the capacity development approach, as in the case of Nepal.
Finally, public awareness on child abuse and exploitation, mainly amidst social crises, should be raised. Attention should also be paid to poor households and cash transfer programs for them could be developed. Poor working children contribute to the family income to cope with poverty; therefore, banning child labour could negatively affect household income. Smith (2020) proposed that poor households should receive financial support so that children are not forced into labour. Therefore, to help children in developing economies during pandemics local authorities and governments must provide child-friendly environments and free education.
Regardless of the geographic region and the countries’ level of development, actions should be coordinated to prevent a potential reversal of the achieved goals regarding child labour. It should be kept in mind that child labour should be eradicated in order to develop a just and free society. In conclusion, as suggested by the UNICEF, it is a time of crisis, a time to act.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.K. and T.M.; methodology, P.K.; validation, P.K. and T.M.; formal analysis, P.K.; investigation, P.K.; resources, P.K.; data curation, P.K.; writing—original draft preparation, P.K.; writing—review and editing, P.K. and T.M.; visualization, P.K. and T.M.; supervision, T.M.; project administration, T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abimanyi-Ochom, Julie, Brett Inder, Bruce Hollingsworth, and Paula Lorgelly. 2017. Invisible work: Child work in households with a person living with HIV/AIDS in Central Uganda. SAHARA-J: Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance 14: 93–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Achdut, Netta, and Tehila Refaeli. 2020. Unemployment and Psychological Distress among Young People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Psychological Resources and Risk Factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17: 7163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Admassie, Assefa. 2002. Exploring the High Incidence of Child Labor in Sub—Saharan Africa. Africa Development Review 14: 251–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ahad, Abdul, Mitu Chowdhury, Yvonee Parry, and Eileen Willis. 2021. Urban child labor in Bangladesh: Determinants and its possible impacts on health and education. Social Sciences 10: 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahad, Abdul, Yvonne Parry, and Eileen Willis. 2020. Spillover trends of child labor during the Coronavirus crisis—An unnoticed wake-up call. Frontiers in Public Health 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alam, Imam M., Shahina Amin, and Janet M. Rives. 2015. A Double-hurdle analysis of the Gender Earnings Gap for Working Children in Bangladesh. The Journal of Developing Areas 49: 41–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alam, Zakiul M. 2021. Is population density a risk factor for communicable diseases like COVID-19? A case of Bangladesh. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 6: 1010539521998858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ali, Amjad, Mumtaz Ahmed, and Nazia Hassan. 2020. Socioeconomic impact of COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from rural mountain community in Pakistan. Journal of Public Affairs 4: e2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aneja, Ranjan, and Vaishali Ahuja. 2020. An assessment of socioeconomic impact of COVID-19 pandemic in India. Journal of Public Affairs 21: e2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Armitage, Richard, and Laura B. Nellums. 2020. COVID-19: Compounding the health—Related harms of human trafficking. EClinicalMedicine 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Asfaw, Abay, and Joachim von Braun. 2004. Is consumption insured against illness? Evidence on vulnerability of households to health shocks in rural Ethiopia. Economic Development and Cultural Change 53: 115–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Assaad, Ragui, Deborah Levison, and Nadia Zibani. 2010. The effect of domestic work on girls’ schooling: Evidence from Egypt. Feminist Economics 16: 79–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ataguba, Ochega A., and John E. Ataguba. 2020. Social determinants of health: The role of effective communication in the COVID-19 pandemic in developing countries. Global Health Action 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Attanasio, Orazio, Emla Fitzsimons, Ana Gomez, Diana Lopez, Costas Meghir, and Alice Mesnard. 2010. Child education and work choices in the presence of a conditional cash transfer programme in rural Colombia. Economic Development and Cultural Change 58: 181–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Awan, Saeed, Muazzam Nasrullah, and Kristin J. Cummings. 2010. Health hazards, injury problems and workplace conditions of carpet-weaving children in three districts of Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 16: 113–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bamgboye, Ebun L., Jesutofunmi A. Omiye, Oluwasegun J. Afolaranmi, Mogamat Razeen Davids, Elliot Koranteng Tannor, Shoyab Wadee, Abdou Niang, Anthony Were, and Saraladevi Naicker. 2020. COVID-19 Pandemic: Is Africa different? Journal of the National Medical Association. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Basu, Kaushik. 1999. Child labor: Causes, consequenses and cure, with remarks on International Labor Standards. Journal of Economic Literature 37: 1083–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Basu, Kaushik. 2002. A Note on the Multiple General Equilibria with Child Labor. Economics Letters 74: 301–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Basu, Kaushik, Sanghamitra Das, and Bhaskar Dutta. 2010. Child labor and household wealth: Theory and empirical evidence of an invented-U. Journal of Development Economics 91: 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Beegle, Kathleen, Rajeev Dehejia, and Roberta Gatti. 2003. Child Labor, Income Shocks and Access to Credit. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3075. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/18222/wps3075.pdf?sequence=1andisAllowed=y (accessed on 7 June 2021).
  21. Beegle, Kathleen, Rajeev Dehejia, and Roberta Gatti. 2006. Child labor, crop shocks and credit constraints. Journal of Development Economics 81: 80–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Beegle, Kathleen, Rajeev Dehejia, and Roberta Gatti. 2009. Why Should we Care about Child Labor? The Education, Labor Market and Health Consequences of Child Labor. The Journal of Human Resources 44: 871–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bérenger, Valérie, and Audrey Verdier-Chouchane. 2016. Child Labour and Schooling in South Sudan and Sudan: Is there a Gender Preference? African Development Review 28: 177–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bong, Choon-Looi, Christopher Brasher, Edson Chikumba, Robert McDougall, Jannicke Mellin-Olsen, and Angela Enright. 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic: Effects on low and middle-income countries. Anesthesia and Analgesia 131: 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bonke, Jens. 2010. Children’s housework. Are girls more active than boys? International Journal of Time Use Research 7: 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bortz, Pablo, Gabriel Michelena, and Fernando Toledo. 2020. A gathering of storms: The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the balance of payments of emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs). International Journal of Political Economy 49: 318–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Braun, Sebastian. 2006. Core Labour Standards and FDI: Friends or foes? The Case of Child Labour. Review of World Economics 142: 765–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brown, Samantha M., Jenalee R. Doom, Stephanie Lechuga-Peña, Sarah Enos Watamura, and Tiffany Koppels. 2020. Stress and parenting during the global COVID-19 pandemic. Child Abuse and Neglect 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brum, Matias, and Mauricio De Rosa. 2021. Too little but not too late: Nowcasting poverty and cash transfers’ incidents during COVID-19’ crisis. World Development 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Busse, Matthias, and Sebastian Braun. 2004. Export structure, FDI and child labor. Journal of Economic Integration 19: 804–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Caesar-Leo, Michaela. 1999. Child labour: The most visible type of child abuse and neglect in India. Child Abuse Review 8: 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Campbell, Sydney, Carlo Cicero Oneto, Manav Preet Singh Saini, Nona Attaran, Nora Makansi, Raissa Passos Dos Santos, Shilni Pukuma, and Franco A. Carnevale. 2021. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on children: An ethical analysis with a global-child lens. Global Studies of Childhood 11: 105–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Canagarajah, Sudharshan, and Helena S. Nielsen. 2001. Child Labor in Africa: A Comparative Study. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 575: 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chaudhuri, Sarbajit. 2011. Labor Market Reform and Incidence of Child Labor in a Developing Economy. Economic Modelling 28: 1923–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chaudhuri, Sarbajit, and Jayanta K. Dwibedi. 2016. Foreign Direct Investment and Domestic Child Labor. Review of Development Economics 21: 383–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chopra, Geeta. 2020. Covid-19 disrupts India’s March towards making her children thrive and transform. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 10: 184–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chukwudeh, Okechukwu, and Akpovire Oduaran. 2021. Liminality and child labour: Experiences of school aged working children with implications for community education in Africa. Social Sciences 10: 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Costa, Gabriel W., André Carraro, Felipe. G. Ribeiro, and Mariane F. Borba. 2020. The Impact of Child Labor Eradication Programs in Brazil. The Journal of Developing Areas 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Couch, Kenneth, Robert Fairlie, and Huanan Xu. 2020. Early evidence of the impacts of COVID-19 on minority unemployment. Journal of Public Economics 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Daly, Angela, Alyson Hillis, Shubhendra Man Shrestha, and Babu Kaji Shrestha. 2020. Bricks in the wall: A review of the issues that affect children of in-country seasonal migrant workers in the bricks kilns of Nepal. Geography Compass 14: e12547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Daly, Angela, Alyson Hillis, Shubhendra Man Shrestha, and Babu Kaji Shrestha. 2021. Breaking the child labour cycle through education: Issues and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children of in-country seasonal migrant workers in the brick kilns of Nepal. Children’s Geographies, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dammert, Ana, and Jose Galdo. 2013. Child labor variation by type of respondent: Evidence from a large-scale study. World Development 51: 207–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. De Matos, Dihogo Gama, Felipe J. Aidar, Paulo Francisco de Almeida-Neto, Osvaldo Costa Moreira, Raphael Fabrício de Souza, Anderson Carlos Marçal, Lucas Soares Marcucci-Barbosa, Francisco de Assis Martins Júnior, Lazaro Fernandes Lobo, Jymmys Lopes dos Santos, and et al. 2020. The impact of measures recommended by the government to limit the spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19) on physical activity levels, quality of life and mental health of Brazilians. Sustainability 12: 9072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Deb, Sibnath. 2005. Child abuse and neglect in a metropolitan city: A qualitative study of migrant child labour in Soutrh Kolkata. Social Change 35: 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Diallo, Yacouba, Alex Etienne, and Farhad Mehran. 2013. Global Child Labour Trends 2008 to 2012, ILO, International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC). Available online: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Global_Child_Labour_Trends_2008-2012_EN_Web%20(1).pdf (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  46. Dillon, Andrew, Elena Bardasi, Kathleen Beegle, and Pieter Serneels. 2012. Explaining variation in child labor statistics. Journal of Development Economics 98: 136–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Douglas, Pamela K., David B. Douglas, Daniel C. Harrigan, and Kathleen M. Douglas. 2009. Preparing for pandemic influenza and its aftermath: Mental health issues considered. International Journal of Emergence Mental Health 11: 137–44. [Google Scholar]
  48. Dumas, Christelle. 2020. Productivity shocks and child labor: The role of credit and agricultural labor markets. Economic Development and Cultural Change 68: 763–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Duryea, Suzanne, David Lam, and Deborah Levison. 2007. Effects of economic shocks in children’s employment and schooling in Brazil. Journal of Development Economics 84: 188–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Edmonds, Eric V., and Maheshwor Shrestha. 2014. You get what you pay for: Schooling incentives and child labor. Journal of Development Economics 111: 196–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Edmonds, Eric. V., and Nina Pavcnik. 2005. Child labor in the global economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Evans, Ruth. 2012. Sibling caringscapes: Time-space practices of caring within youth-headed households in Tanzania and Uganda. Geoforum 4: 824–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fetuga, Bolanle. M., Fidelis O. Njokama, and Adebiyi O. Olowu. 2005. Prevalence, Types and Demographic Features of Child Labour among School Children in Nigeria. BMC International Health and Human Rights 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fong, Vanessa C., and Grace Iarocci. 2020. Child and family outcomes following pandemics: A systematic review and recommendation on COVID-19 policies. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 45: 1124–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ghosh, Debajyoti, Jonathan A. Bernstein, and Tesfaye Mersha. 2020a. COVID-19 pandemic: The African paradox. Journal of Global Health 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ghosh, Ritwik, Mahua J. Dubey, Subhankar Chatterjee, and Souvik Dubey. 2020b. Impact of COVID-19 on children: Special focus on the psychosocial aspect. Minerva Pediatrica 72: 226–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gicharu, Pauline, Bernard Mwaniki, Agnes Kubui, Loise Gichuhi, and Ruth W. Kahiga. 2015. Effect of HIV/AIDS on academic performance of preschool children in Kijabe location, Kiambu country, Kenya. International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology 2: 3. [Google Scholar]
  58. Goldman, Philip S., Marinus H. van Ijzendoorn, and Edmund J. Sonuga-Barke. 2020. The implications of COVID-19 for the care of children living in residential institutions. Lancet Child Adolescent Health 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Goulas, Sofoklis, and Rigissa Megalokonomou. 2020. School attendance during a pandemic. Economic Letters 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Greenbaum, Jordan, and Nia Bodrick. 2017. Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Section on International Child Health, Pediatrics 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Greenbaum, Jordan, Hanni Stoklosa, and Laura Murphy. 2020. The public health impact of coronavirus disease on human trafficking. Frontiers in Public Health 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Grier, Beverly. 2004. Child labor and Africanist scholarship: A critical review. African Studies Review 47: 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gupta, Sonia, and Manveen K. Jawanda. 2020. The impacts of COVID-19 on children. Acta Paediatrica 109: 2181–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gustafsson-Wright, Emily, Wendy Janssens, and Jacques van der Gaag. 2011. The inequitable impact oh health shocks on the uninsured in Namibia. Health Policy Plan 26: 142–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Gutiérrez-Romero, Roxana, and Mostak Ahamed. 2021. COVID-19 response needs to broaden financial inclusion to curb the rise in poverty. World Development 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Haer, Roos. 2019. Children and armed conflict: Looking at the future and learning from the past. Third World Quarterly 40: 74–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Haines, Andy, David Sanders, Uta Lehmann, Alexander K. Rowe, Joy E. Lawn, Steve Jan, Damian G. Walker, and Zulfiqar Bhutta. 2007. Achieving child survival goals: Potential contribution of community healthy workers. Lancet 369: 2121–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hilson, Gavin. 2010. Child Labour in African Artisanal Mining Communities: Experiences from Northern Ghana. Development and Change 41: 445–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Holgado, Daniel, Isidro Maya-Jariego, Ignacio Ramos, Jorge Palacio, Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios, Vanessa Romero-Mendoza, and José Amar. 2014. Impact of Child Labor on Academic Performance: Evidence from the Program “Edúcame Primero Colombia”. International Journal of Educational Development 34: 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Holmberg, Martin. 2017. The ghost of pandemics past: Revisiting two centuries of influenza in Sweden. Medical Humanities 43: 141–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Huisman, Janine, and Jeroen Smits. 2015. Keeping Children in School: Effects on Household and Context Characteristics on School Dropout in 363 Districts of 30 Developing Countries. SAGE Open 5: 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. ILO. 1973. C138—Minimum Age Convention. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ilo_code:C138 (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  73. ILO. 2010. Study on the Reintegration of Children Formerly Associated with Armed Forces and Groups through Informal Apprenticeship. Case Studies of Korhogo (Ivory Coast) and Bunia (Democratic Republic of Congo). Available online: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Study_reintegration_children_associated_armed_forces_case_study_EN%20(1).pdf (accessed on 7 June 2021).
  74. ILO. 2011. SCREAM: A Special Module on Child Labour and Armed Conflict. Available online: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/SCREAM_Armed_Conflict_Module_EN.pdf (accessed on 7 June 2021).
  75. ILO/IPEC. 2021. What Is Child Labor. Defining Child Labor. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/ipec/facts/lang--en/index.htm (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  76. ILO/UNICEF. 2020. COVID-19 and Child Labour: A Time of Crisis, a Time to Act. Briefing Paper. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/media/70261/file/COVID-19-and-Child-labour-2020.pdf (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  77. Islam, Asadul, and Pushkar Maitra. 2012. Health shocks and consumption smoothing in rural households: Does microcredit have a role to play? Journal of Development Economics 97: 232–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jafarey, Saqib, and Sajal Lahiri. 2002. Will Trade Sabctions Reduce Child Labour? The Role of Credit Markets. Journal of Development Economics 68: 137–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jentsch, Birgit, and Brigitte Schnock. 2020. Child welfare in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic—Emerging evidence from Germany. Child Abuse and Neglect 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kansiime, Monica K., Justice A. Tambo, Idah Mugambi, Mary Bundi, Augustine Kara, and Charles Owuor. 2021. COVID-19 implications on household income and food security in Kenya and Uganda: Findings from a rapid assessment. World Development 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kaur, Navpreet, and Roger W. Byard. 2021. Prevalence and potential consequences of child labour in India and the possible impact of COVID-19—A contemporary overview. Medicine Science and the Law. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kea, Pamela. 2007. Girl Farm Labour and Double-shift Schooling in The Gambia: The Paradox of Development Intervention. Canadian Journal of African Studies 41: 258–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kechagia, Polyxeni, and Theodore Metaxas. 2018. Sixty Years of FDI Empirical Research: Review, Comparison and Critique. The Journal of Developing Areas 52: 169–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kim, Chae-Young. 2009. Is Combining Child Labour and Schoold Education the Right Approach? Investigating the Cambodian Case. International Journal of Educational Development 29: 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kluttz, Jenalee. 2015. Reevaluating the relationship between education and child labour using the capabilities approach: Policy and implications for inequality in Cambodia. Theory and Research in Education 13: 165–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kucera, David. 2002. Core Labour Standards and Foreign Direct Investment. International Labour Review 141: 31–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kumar, Alok, and Najmus Saqib. 2017. School Abseeintism and Child Labor in Rural Banghladesh. The Journal of Developing Areas 51: 299–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kumate, Jesús, Jaime Sepulveda, and Gonzalo Gultierrez. 1998. Cholera epidemiology in Latin America and perspectives for eradication. Bulletin de l’ Institut Pasteur 94: 217–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Larmar, Stephen, Merina Sunuwar, Helen Sherpa, Roopshree Joshi, and Lucy P. Jordan. 2020. Strengthening community engagement in Nepal during COVID-19: Community-Based training and development to reduce child labour. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development 31: 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lee, Seoyeon. 2021. An exploratory study on COVID-19 and the Rights of Children based on Keyword Network Analysis. Research Square. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Leinberger-Jabari, Andrea, David L. Parket, and Charles Oberg. 2005. Chidl labor, gender, and health. Public Health Reports 120: 642–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Levison, Deborah, and Karine Moe. 1998. Household work as a deterrent to schooling: An analysis of adolescent girls in Peru. The Journal of Developing Areas 32: 339–56. [Google Scholar]
  93. Lieten, Georges K. 2011. Hazardous Child Labour in Latin America. Cham: Springer, pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lugalla, Joe L., and Huruma L. Sigalla. 2010. Child labour in the Era of HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: A case study of Tanzania. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 35: 8–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ly, John, Vidiya Sathananthan, Thomas Griffiths, Zahir Kanjee, Avi Kenny, Nicholas Gordon, Gaurab Basu, Dale Battistoli, Lorenzo Dorr, Breeanna Lorenzen, and et al. 2016. Facility-based delivery during the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic in rural Liberia: Analysis from a cross-sectional, population-based household survey. PLoS Medicine 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Maconachie, Roy, and Gavin Hilson. 2016. Re-thinking the Child Labor “problem” in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: The Case of Sierra Leone’s Half Shovels. World Development 78: 136–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mahmod, Nik Ahmad Kamal Nik, Marhanum Che Mohd Salleh, Ashgar Ali Muhammad, and Azizah Mohd. 2016. A study on child labour as a form of child abuse in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 6: 525–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Makoni, Munyaradzi. 2020. COVID-19 in Africa: Half a year later. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Maruf, Aberra, Michael W. Kifle, and Lemma Indrias. 2003. Child labor and associated problems in rural town in South West Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development 17: 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  100. Mora-Garcia, Claudio A. 2018. Can benefits from Malaria eradication be increased? Evidence from Costa Rica. Economic Development and Cultural Change 66: 585–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Murray, Colonel J. 2010. A collaborative approach to meeting the psychosocial needs of children during an influenza pandemic. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing 15: 135–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Naemabadi, Arezu, Heidar Sharafi, Paniz Shirmast, Hamidreza Karimi-Sari, Seyed Hoda Alavian, Farzaneh Padami, Mahdi Safiabadi, Seyed Ehsan Alavian, and Seyed Moayed Alavian. 2019. Prevalence of hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV infections in working children of Afghan immigrants in two supporting centers in Thran and Alborz Provinces, Iran. Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseasesm 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Naufal, George, Michael Malcolm, and Vidya Diwakar. 2019. Armed conflict and child labor: Evidence from Iraq. Middle East Development Journal 11: 236–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ngegba, Mohamed P., and David A. Mansaray. 2016. Perception of students on the impact of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) on the education system of Sierra Leone. International Journal of Advanced Biological Research 6: 119–28. [Google Scholar]
  105. Nguyen, Huong T. T., Tham T. Nguyen, Vu A. T. Dam, Long H. Nguyen, Giang T. Vu, Huong L. T. Nguyen, Hien T. Nguyen, and Huong T. Le. 2020. COVID-19 employment crisis in Vietnam: Global issue, National solutions. Frontiers in Public Health 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Nicola, Maria, Zaid Alsafi, Catrin Sohrabi, Ahmed Kerwan, Ahmed Al-Jabir, Christos Iosifidis, Maliha Agha, and Riaz Agha. 2020. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. International Journal of Surgery 78: 185–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Nyambedha, Eric O., Simiyu Wandibba, and Jens Aagaard-Hansen. 2003. Changing patterns of orphan care due to the HIV epidemic in western Kenya. Social Science and Medicine 57: 301–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Owusu, Lorretta D., and Kwabena Frimpong-Manso. 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on children from poor families in Ghana and the role of welfare institutions. Journal of Children’s Services 15: 185–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pak, Anton, Oyelola A. Adegboye, Adeshina I. Adekunle, Kazi M. Rahman, Emma S. McBryde, and Damon P. Eisen. 2020. Economic Consequences of the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Need for Epidemic Preparedness. Frontiers in Public Health 8: 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Pattanaik, Ipsita P. 2021. Corona virus, child labour and imperfect market in India. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Peters, Krijn. 2011. The crisis of youth in postwar Sierra Leone: Problem Solved? Africa Today 58: 128–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Pinchoff, Jessie, Karen Austrian, Nandita Rajshekhar, Timothy Abuya, Beth Kangwana, Rhoune Ochako, James Benjamin Tidwell, Daniel Mwanga, Eva Muluve, Faith Mbushi, and et al. 2021. Gendered economic, social and health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigation policies in Kenya: Evidence from a prospective cohort survey in Nairobi informal settlements. BMJ Open 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Pinchoff, Jessie, Kim G. Santhya, Corinne White, Shilpi Rampal, Rajib Acharya, and Thoai D. Ngo. 2020. Gender specific differences in COVID-19 knowledge, behavior and health effects among adolescents and young adults in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, India. PLoS ONE 15: e0244053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Poirier, Mathieu J., Ricardo Izurieta, Sharad S. Malavade, and Michael D. McDonald. 2012. Re-emergence of cholera in the Americas: Risks, susceptibility, and ecology. Journal of Global Infectious Diseases 4: 162–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Progga, Farhat T., Tanzil M. Shahria, Asma Arisha, and Minhaz Shanto. 2020. A deep learning based approach to child labour detection. Paper presented at 6th Information Technology International Seminar (ITIS), Surabaya, Indonesia, October 14–16; pp. 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Psacharopoulos, George. 1997. Child Labor versus Educational Attainment. Some evidence from Latin America. Journal of Population Economics 10: 377–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Putnick, Diane L., and Marc H. Bornstein. 2015. Is child labor a barrier to school enrollment in low- and middle-income countries? International Journal of Educational Development 41: 112–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Putnick, Diane L., and Marc H. Bornstein. 2016. Girls’ and boys’ labor and household chores in low- and middle-income countries. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 81: 104–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Rafferty, Yvonne. 2020. Promoting the welfare, protection and care of victims of child trafficking during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Journal of Children’s Services 15: 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Raman, Shanti, Maria Harries, Rita Nathawad, Rosina Kyeremateng, Rajeev Seth, and Bob Lonne. 2020. Where do we go from here? A child rights-based response to COVID-19. BMJ Paediatrics Open 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Ramaswamy, Sheila, and Shekhar Seshadri. 2020. Children on the brink: Risks for child protection, sexual abuse and related mental health problems in the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Journal of Psychiatry 62: S404–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Ravallion, Martin, and Quentin Wodon. 2000. Does child labour displace schooling? Evidence on behavioural responses to an enrollment subsidy. The Economic Journal 110: 158–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike, Anne Kaman, Michael Erhart, Janine Devine, Robert Schlack, and Christiane Otto. 2021. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on quality of life and mental health in children and adolescents in Germany. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ray, Ranjan. 2002. Determinants of Child Labour and Child Schooling in Ghana. Journal of African Economies 11: 561–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ray, Ranjan, and Geoffrey Lancaster. 2005. The impact of children’s work on schooling: Multi-country evidence. International Labour Review 144: 189–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Rena, Ravinder. 2009. The Child Labor in Developing Countries: A Challenge to Millennium Development Goals. Indus Journal of Management and Social Science 3: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  127. Rivarola Puntigliano, Andrés. 2020. Pandemics and multiple crises in Latin America. Latin America Policy 11: 313–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Roberton, Timothy, Emily D. Carter, Victoria B. Chou, Angela R. Stegmuller, Bianca D. Jackson, Yvonne Tam, Talata Sawadogo-Lewis, and Neff Walker. 2020. Early estimates of the indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and child mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: A modelling study. Lancet Global Health 8: 901–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Rodriguez, Christina M., Shawna J. Lee, Kaitlin P. Ward, and Doris F. Fu. 2021. The perfect storm: Hidden risk of child maltreatment during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Child Maltreatment 26: 139–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Roggero, Paola, Viviana Magiaterra, Flavia Bustreo, and Furio Rosati. 2007. The health impact of child labor in developing countries: Evidence from cross-country data. American Journal of Public Health 97: 271–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Romero, Danilo Hernández A., Anna Oudin, Ulf Strömberg, Jan-Eric Karlsson, Hans Welinder, Gustavo Sequeira, Luís Blanco, Mario Jiménez, Félix Sánchez, and María Albin. 2010. Respiratory symptoms among waste-picking child laborers: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 16: 120–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Santos, Indhira V. 2010. The effects of earthquakes on children and human development in rural El Salvador. In Risk, Shocks and Human Development. Edited by Ricardo Fuenters-Nieva and Papa A. Seck. London: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sarkar, Amitabha, Guangqi Liu, Yinzi Jin, Zheng Xie, and Zhi-Jie Zheng. 2020. Public health preparedness and responses to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in South Asia: A situation and policy analysis. Global Health Journal 4: 121–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sasmal, Joydeb, and Jorge Guillen. 2015. Poverty, educational failure and the child-labour trap: The Indian experience. Global Business Review 16: 270–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Save the Children/UNICEF/World Vision/Plan International. 2015. Children’s Ebola Recovery Assessment: Sierra Leone. Available online: https://www.savethechildren.org/content/dam/global/reports/emergency-humanitarian-response/ebola-rec-sierraleone.pdf (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  136. Scanlon, Thomas J., Vivien Prior, Maria Luiza N. Lamarao, and Margaret A. Lynch. 2002. Child Labour. BMJ 325: 401–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Schlick, Cornelia, Manuela Joachin, Leonardo Briceño, Daniel Moraga, and Katja Radon. 2014. Occupational Injuries among Children and Adolescents in Cusco Province: A Cross-sectional Study. BMC Public Health 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Sedlacek, Guilherme, Suzanne Duryea, Nadeem Ilahi, and Masaru Sasaki. 2009. Child Labor, Schooling and Poverty in Latin America. In Child Labor and Education in Latin America. Edited by Peter F. Orazem, Guilherme Sedlacek and Tzannakos Zafiris. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Shafiq, Najeeb M. 2007. Household Schooling and Child Labor Decisions in Rural Bangladesh. Journal of Asian Economics 18: 946–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Sharfuddin, Syed. 2020. The world after COVID-19. The Round Table 109: 247–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Shelley-Egan, Clare, and Jim Dratwa. 2019. Marginalization, Ebola and Health for All: From outbreak to lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16: 3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Shendell, Derek G., Saisattha Noomnual, Shumaila Chishti, MaryAnn Sorensen Allacci, and Jaime Madrigano. 2016. Exposures resulting in safety and health concerns for child laborers in less developed countries. Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2016: 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Silva, Gisella Christina, Jorge Alberto Iriart, Sônia Christina Lima Chaves, and Erik Ashley Abade. 2019. Characteristics of research on child labor in Latin America. Cadernos de Saúde Publica 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Smith, William C. 2020. Potential long-term consequences of school closures: Lessons from the 2013–2016 Ebola pandemic. Research Square. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Sorsa, Solomon, and Alemu Abera. 2016. A study on child labor in three major towns of southern Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development 20: 136–205. [Google Scholar]
  146. Sserwanja, Quraish, Joseph Kawuki, and Jean Kim. 2021. Increased child abuse in Uganda amidst COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 57: 188–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Stone, Rupert. 2020. COVID-19 in South Asia: Mirror and catalyst. Asian Affaires 51: 542–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Tamarit, Alicia, Usue de la Barrera, Estefanía Mónaco, Konstanze Schoeps, and Inmaculada Montoya Castilla. 2020. Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic in Spanish adolescents: Risk and protective factors of emotional symptoms. Revista de Psicologia Clinica con Niňos y Adolescentes 7: 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  149. Taraphdar, Pranita, Rray T. Guha, Dibakar Haldar, Aniruddha Chatterjee, Adhiraj Dasgupta, Bikram K. Saha, and Sanku Mallik. 2011. Socioeconomic consequences of HIV/AIDS in the famility system. Nigerian Medical Journal: Journal of the Nigeria Medical Association 52: 250–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. The World Bank Group. 2020. The COVID-19 Pandemic: Shocks to Education and Policy Responses. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/33696/148198.pdf?sequence=4andisAllowed=y (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  151. Tiwary, Rajnarayan, Asim Saha, and John Parikh. 2009. Respiratory mobilities among working children of gem polishing industries, India. Toxicology and Industrial Health 25: 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. UNICEF. 2007. Child Labour, Education and Policy Options. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/Child_Labor_Education_and_Policy_Options.pdf (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  153. UNICEF. 2019a. Percentage of Children Aged 5–17 Years Engaged in Child Labour (by Sex). Available online: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/child-labour/ (accessed on 7 June 2021).
  154. UNICEF. 2019b. Guidelines to Strengthen the Social Service Workforce for Child Protection. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/Guidelines-to-strengthen-social-service-for-child-protection-2019.pdf (accessed on 7 June 2021).
  155. United Nations Statistics Division. 2021. Child Labor. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/child-labor (accessed on 6 May 2021).
  156. United Nations/DESA. 2020. Responses to the COVID-19 Catastrophe Could Turn the Tide on Inequality. Available online: https://olc.worldbank.org/system/files/PB-65.pdf (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  157. Van Lancker, Wim, and Zachary Parolin. 2020. COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: A social crisis in the making. Lancet Public Health 5: 243–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Vásquez, William, and Alok Bohara. 2010. Household shocks, child labor and child schooling: Evidence from Guatemala. Latin American Research Review 45: 165–86. [Google Scholar]
  159. Wagstaff, Adam. 2007. The economic consequences of health shocks: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Health Economics 26: 82–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Webbink, Ellen, Jeroen Smits, and Eelke de Jong. 2012. Hidden child labor: Determinants of housework and family business work of children in 16 developing countries. World Development 40: 631–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Workie, Endashaw, Joby Mackolil, Joan Nyika, and Sendhil Ramadas. 2020. Deciphering the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on food security, agriculture and the livelihoods: A review of the evidence from developing countries. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Wu, Qi, and Yanfeng Xu. 2020. Parenting stress and risk of child maltreatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: A family stress theory-informed perspective. Developmental Child Welfare 2: 180–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wunsch, Kathrin, Carina Nigg, Claudia Niessner, Steffen C. E. Schmidt, Doris Oriwol, Anke Hanssen-Doose, Alexander Burchartz, Ana Eichsteller, Simon Kolb, Annette Wortrh, and et al. 2021. The impact of COVID-19 on the interrelation of physical activity, screen time and health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in Germany: Results of the Motorik-Modul study. Children 8: 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Yoder-van den Brink, Hélène. 2019. Reflections on “Building Back Better” child and adolescent mental health care in a low-resource postemergency setting: The case of Sierra Leone. Frontiers in Psychiatry 10: 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Zahed, Ghazal, Newsha Chehrehrazi, and Abouzar Nouri Talemi. 2020. How does COVID-19 affect child labor? Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Zapata, Daniela, Dante Contreras, and Diana Kruger. 2011. Child Labor and Schooling in Bolivia: Who’s Failing Behing? The Roles of Domestic Work, Gender and Ethnicity. World Development 39: 588–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Share of children aged 5–17 years engaged in labour (2017). Source: United Nations Statistics Division (2021).
Figure 1. Share of children aged 5–17 years engaged in labour (2017). Source: United Nations Statistics Division (2021).
Socsci 10 00321 g001
Table 1. Terms and variations of the database research.
Table 1. Terms and variations of the database research.
Keyword(s)Synonym or Variations
Child labourChild labor, minor employees, working children, child labor force, child labourer, child laborer, employment of children, labour of children
PandemicEpidemic, contagious diseases, Ebola, SARS, HIV/AIDS
Developing countriesDeveloping economies, low-and-middle income countries, emerging economies, emerging countries, developing nations, Third World
Table 2. Studies on child labour and previous non-COVID 19 pandemics (developing countries).
Table 2. Studies on child labour and previous non-COVID 19 pandemics (developing countries).
Author(s)CaseCountry/CountriesMethodologyFindings
Nyambedha et al. (2003)HIV/AIDSKenyaA combination of qualitative and quantitative research, cross-sectional research, semi-structured interviews, questionnaire, in-depth interviews.The HIV/AIDS epidemic in Kenya affected the care of orphans since the majority of orphans worked as servants. In addition, the pandemic led to demographic changes and affected food security in the country.
Roggero et al. (2007)HIV/AIDS, malaria83 developing countriesMultiple regression between child labour and health indicators.There is a positive association between child labour and the presence of infectious diseases, such as malaria and HIV/AIDS.
Lugalla and Sigalla (2010)HIV/AIDSUnited Republic of TanzaniaEthnographic qualitative research, including in depth-interviews, observation etc.Minors were forced into the labour force due to increased poverty rates and reduced household income. Poverty and HIV/AIDS were correlated, mainly for orphans.
Evans (2012)HIV/AIDSTanzania and UgandaQualitative survey, semi-structured interviews, focus groups.In both countries youths were pressured to work in order to sustain their family. The pandemic also affected the physical health and well-being of caregivers.
Gicharu et al. (2015)HIV/AIDSKenyaQualitative and quantitative research, interviews, questionnaire, observation.The pandemic affected children’s lives and increased absenteeism from school, dropout rates and child labour.
Save the Children/UNICEF/World Vision/Plan International (2015)Ebola virus disease (EVD)Sierra LeoneThematic content analysis.The Ebola pandemic increased child labour and maltreatment, mainly due to school closures and reduced household income.
Ly et al. (2016)EVDLiberiaCluster sampling during March–April 2015 in 941 households.The pandemic led to higher poverty and child labour rates, leading to psychosocial problems and higher social vulnerability.
Ngegba and Mansaray (2016)EVDSierra LeoneQuestionnaires, interviews, observation and focus group discussion for the period September–November 2015.The pandemic affected mainly the well-being of girls; most of them dropped out of school in order to engage in economic activity.
Sorsa and Abera (2016)MalariaEthiopiaA combination of qualitative and quantitative research, including in depth interviews, focus groups discussions, observations and cross-sectional surveys.The researchers studied child employment in three major Ethiopian towns and concluded that minor employees had a negative attitude towards education. Among them, the malaria epidemic was reported as the main health problem. The pandemic threatened their development and the family unit.
Abimanyi-Ochom et al. (2017)HIV/AIDSUgandaCross-sectional study carried out from October 2010 to January 2011 using questionnaires.The pandemic increased the need for child labourers in households with a person living with the disease. The impact was greater for boys.
Mora-Garcia (2018)MalariaCosta RicaQuantitative research, difference-in-difference method.Malaria eradication programs increased schooling and reduced child labour.
Yoder-van den Brink (2019)EVDSierra LeoneDissemination and implementation research.The Ebola pandemic affected everyday lives and well-being in the country. Child labour increased due to the school closures.
Smith (2020)EVDSierra Leone and GuineaMultiple survey (Demographic Health Surveys, Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys), pre and post period 2013–2016.Dropout rates in the post-Ebola period increased and students were forced to work in order to face the economic crisis and to support their families.
Table 3. Studies on child labour and COVID-19 (developing countries).
Table 3. Studies on child labour and COVID-19 (developing countries).
Author(s)CaseSampleMethodologyResults and Suggestions
Chopra (2020)COVID-19IndiaLiterature reviewChild protection services in the country are not fully functional. Children in the country, mainly street and abandoned children, receive limited support, which increases the risks of child abuse and labour.
Greenbaum et al. (2020)COVID-19Not definedLiterature reviewThe recent pandemic could increase human trafficking and labour exploitation. Minors are more likely to engage in hazardous or illegal activities and work in unhealthy working conditions.
Larmar et al. (2020)COVID-19NepalLiterature reviewRecovery programs should be applied in the country in order to build capacity and strengthen cooperation among social workers, non-governmental organizations, health professionals and community-based organizations.
Owusu and Frimpong-Manso (2020)COVID-19GhanaLiterature reviewThe COVID-19 pandemic is expected to have severe socioeconomic consequences, mainly for poor families. As a result, poor children are more likely to be left homeless and be forced to work.
Progga et al. (2020)COVID-19BangladeshLiterature reviewChild labour should be effectively detected and prevented. A dataset on child labour would be an effective solution in Bangladesh and in other countries of the region, including India, Nepal and Pakistan.
Nguyen et al. (2020)COVID-19VietnamLiterature reviewIt is estimated that the pandemic could lead to severe socioeconomic problems, including increased exploitation and child labour, higher dropout rates and malnutrition.
Ramaswamy and Seshadri (2020)COVID-19IndiaLiterature reviewLockdown during the recent pandemic and the arising economic issues are expected to increase child abuse, trafficking and maltreatment, including child labour. The study concluded that attention should be paid to the likely psychosocial and mental health issues for children as a result of the pandemic.
ILO/UNICEF (2020)COVID-19Not definedLiterature reviewThe research concluded that the recent pandemic could affect child labour through reducing employment opportunities, living standards, remittances and migration and international aid flows. Additional channels that could influence child labour were increased informal child labour, reduced Foreign Direct Investment and school closures.
The World Bank Group (2020)COVID-19Not definedLiterature reviewThe COVID-19 pandemic will lead to a shock to education, resulting in higher dropout rates, which are linked to higher rates of child labour.
United Nations/DESA (2020)COVID-19Not definedLiterature reviewSchool closures as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic are associated with higher child labour rates and maltreatment.
Kaur and Byard (2021)COVID-19IndiaLiterature reviewThe potential consequences of COVID-19 include an economic crisis, which would mainly affect children. India has severe gaps in the protection services and therefore minors are more vulnerable to child labour and exploitation.
Sserwanja et al. (2021)COVID-19UgandaLiterature reviewThe pandemic had a significant negative impact on the children’s health status and food care. The country has insufficient social support systems which rendered children even more vulnerable to child abuse, including child labour and limited financial support.
Daly et al. (2021)COVID-19NepalLiterature reviewNepalese children are more vulnerable to poverty, poor health, including COVID-19 contamination and educational exclusion.
Pattanaik (2021)COVID-19IndiaLiterature reviewThe study concludes that the COVID-19 pandemic is expected to have a significant negative impact on the country’s economy and on the labour market imperfections, leading to higher child labour rates.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Back to TopTop