Next Article in Journal
Seasonal Changes in Indoor Thermal Conditions and Thermal Comfort in Urban Houses in the Warm–Humid Climate of India
Previous Article in Journal
Research on the Sustainable Development of Traditional Village Residential Dwellings in Northern Shaanxi, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Coworking and Flexible Workspaces as Drivers for Sustainable Spatial Development in Non-Metropolitan Bulgaria

by
Ivanka G. Kamenova
Department of Sustainable Land Use and Real Estate Management, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Architecture Civil Engineering and Geodesy, 1046 Sofia, Bulgaria
Buildings 2026, 16(2), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020381
Submission received: 6 October 2025 / Revised: 5 January 2026 / Accepted: 7 January 2026 / Published: 16 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Architectural Design, Urban Science, and Real Estate)

Abstract

This article examines the role of coworking and flexible workspaces in promoting sustainable spatial development in the non-metropolitan areas of Bulgaria. A mixed-method approach was applied, combining inventory enumeration, spatial classification, SDG-based sustainability assessment, and qualitative coding (open, axial, selective). A total of 74 coworking and flexible workspaces were identified across the six national planning regions, evaluated according to six analytical criteria (accessibility, seasonality, specialization, municipal administrative district, urban planning zone, building function) and assessed against five SDG-aligned dimensions (SDG 8, 9, 11, 12, 13). The results reveal uneven territorial distribution, strong concentration in major cities outside the capital, and emerging sustainable models in peripheral areas. Comparative SDG scoring and typological interpretation demonstrate three recurring models—Sustainable Reuse, Nature-Oriented, and Innovative/Experimental—each associated with distinct spatial and environmental characteristics. A metropolitan benchmarking exercise further contextualizes the strongest sustainability profiles. Based on these findings, a conceptual sustainable coworking model is developed for a nationally significant spa and climatic resort, illustrating how coworking can address regional disparities, support green transition policies, and reinforce territorial cohesion. The article concludes by outlining research directions related to digitalization, circular construction, environmental performance indicators, and feasibility assessments for non-metropolitan coworking development.
Keywords: coworking spaces; sustainable coworking model; Activity-Based Flexible Offices (A-FO); sustainable spatial development; non-metropolitan areas; regional development; territorial cohesion; United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); digitalization; qualitative analysis coworking spaces; sustainable coworking model; Activity-Based Flexible Offices (A-FO); sustainable spatial development; non-metropolitan areas; regional development; territorial cohesion; United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); digitalization; qualitative analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kamenova, I.G. Coworking and Flexible Workspaces as Drivers for Sustainable Spatial Development in Non-Metropolitan Bulgaria. Buildings 2026, 16, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020381

AMA Style

Kamenova IG. Coworking and Flexible Workspaces as Drivers for Sustainable Spatial Development in Non-Metropolitan Bulgaria. Buildings. 2026; 16(2):381. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kamenova, Ivanka G. 2026. "Coworking and Flexible Workspaces as Drivers for Sustainable Spatial Development in Non-Metropolitan Bulgaria" Buildings 16, no. 2: 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020381

APA Style

Kamenova, I. G. (2026). Coworking and Flexible Workspaces as Drivers for Sustainable Spatial Development in Non-Metropolitan Bulgaria. Buildings, 16(2), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop