Next Article in Journal
Disability in the Built Environment: A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Journal
Topologically Consistent Embedding of Manifold Cells into a Polyhedral Space Partition: A General Algorithm for Spatial Modeling of the Built Environment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Priority Ranking of Energy Efficiency Renovation Measures for Existing Buildings Under Budget Constraints: A Hierarchical Decision-Making Framework Integrated with Carbon Revenue Analysis

School of Architecture and Civil Engineer, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2026, 16(14), 2730; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16142730
Submission received: 31 May 2026 / Revised: 29 June 2026 / Accepted: 6 July 2026 / Published: 9 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Building Energy, Physics, Environment, and Systems)

Abstract

Reducing carbon emissions while carrying out urban renewal has put existing residential buildings in the spotlight for low-carbon transformation. These buildings typically consume large amounts of energy and offer significant savings potential, making them a priority in the building sector. Addressing the challenges of limited capital, long payback periods, and inadequate comprehensive benefit assessment in building energy retrofits, this study introduces a carbon trading mechanism and develops a priority decision-making framework based on life-cycle cost–benefit analysis and net present value rate (NPVR). Five typical retrofit measures (grouped into four simulation categories), including external wall insulation, roof insulation, window replacement, lighting upgrade, and rooftop photovoltaic (PV) system, are evaluated through TRNSYS energy simulation applied to an aging residential building in Xi’an, China. The results demonstrate that lighting system upgrades and rooftop PV installation yield the highest economic returns and investment efficiency, while building envelope insulation measures, despite delivering substantial energy savings, exhibit lower NPVR due to high initial investment. Sensitivity analysis reveals that electricity price is the dominant factor influencing economic viability, whereas carbon price under current market conditions exerts limited influence on retrofit prioritization. The proposed framework provides a quantitative decision-support tool for building owners and policymakers to optimize retrofit investment strategies under budget constraints.
Keywords: carbon trading mechanism; net present value rate; existing building retrofit; priority decision-making; TRNSYS simulation carbon trading mechanism; net present value rate; existing building retrofit; priority decision-making; TRNSYS simulation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, P.; Chen, J.; Yang, W. Priority Ranking of Energy Efficiency Renovation Measures for Existing Buildings Under Budget Constraints: A Hierarchical Decision-Making Framework Integrated with Carbon Revenue Analysis. Buildings 2026, 16, 2730. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16142730

AMA Style

Cao P, Chen J, Yang W. Priority Ranking of Energy Efficiency Renovation Measures for Existing Buildings Under Budget Constraints: A Hierarchical Decision-Making Framework Integrated with Carbon Revenue Analysis. Buildings. 2026; 16(14):2730. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16142730

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cao, Ping, Junyu Chen, and Wen Yang. 2026. "Priority Ranking of Energy Efficiency Renovation Measures for Existing Buildings Under Budget Constraints: A Hierarchical Decision-Making Framework Integrated with Carbon Revenue Analysis" Buildings 16, no. 14: 2730. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16142730

APA Style

Cao, P., Chen, J., & Yang, W. (2026). Priority Ranking of Energy Efficiency Renovation Measures for Existing Buildings Under Budget Constraints: A Hierarchical Decision-Making Framework Integrated with Carbon Revenue Analysis. Buildings, 16(14), 2730. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16142730

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop