Next Article in Journal
Current Possibilities of Using BIM Models for Compiling Cost Estimates in the Design Phase of Residential Buildings
Previous Article in Journal
Passive Climate Adaptation of Heritage Arcades: Field Evidence on the Geometry–Radiation–Thermal Comfort Chain and Orientation Effects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Optimal Robotic System Selection in 3D Concrete Printing

by
Ciprian Lapusan
1,2,
Camelia Maria Negrutiu
2,3 and
Ioan Sosa
2,3,*
1
Department of Mechatronics and Machine Dynamics, Faculty of Automotive, Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
European University of Technology, European Union
3
Department of Structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2026, 16(1), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16010202
Submission received: 4 November 2025 / Revised: 23 December 2025 / Accepted: 26 December 2025 / Published: 2 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Construction Management, and Computers & Digitization)

Abstract

3D Concrete Printing (3DCP) is increasingly used for both on-site building fabrication and off-site production of structural components in controlled environments. The differences between these application contexts pose distinct requirements and constraints for the robotic systems used for material deposition. Selecting an appropriate robotic architecture, therefore, represents a critical design decision that directly influences printing quality and system performance. To address this challenge, this study proposes a multi-criteria decision-making framework for optimal selection of the robotic architecture for a 3DCP system, in accordance with its application requirements and constraints. For this, the method integrates AHP and TOPSIS, and takes into consideration factors such as technical characteristics, operational requirements, and economic costs. To demonstrate the applicability of the method, a case study was conducted to identify the most suitable robotic architecture for a laboratory-scale façade printing 3DCP system. Three robotic configurations were analyzed: a gantry system, an articulated robotic arm, and a parallel delta robot. The results showed that the articulated robotic arm achieves the highest TOPSIS closeness coefficient (CCᵢ = 0.681), outperforming the other two configurations. These findings align with existing façade-oriented 3DCP studies and indicate that articulated robotic arms are well-suited for the fabrication of geometrically complex components with higher surface quality and dimensional accuracy. The results show that the proposed framework enables transparent, application-driven decisions during early-stage robotic system design for 3DCP.
Keywords: 3D concrete printing; robotic system architecture; multi-criteria analysis; optimal robotic system 3D concrete printing; robotic system architecture; multi-criteria analysis; optimal robotic system

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lapusan, C.; Negrutiu, C.M.; Sosa, I. Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Optimal Robotic System Selection in 3D Concrete Printing. Buildings 2026, 16, 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16010202

AMA Style

Lapusan C, Negrutiu CM, Sosa I. Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Optimal Robotic System Selection in 3D Concrete Printing. Buildings. 2026; 16(1):202. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16010202

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lapusan, Ciprian, Camelia Maria Negrutiu, and Ioan Sosa. 2026. "Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Optimal Robotic System Selection in 3D Concrete Printing" Buildings 16, no. 1: 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16010202

APA Style

Lapusan, C., Negrutiu, C. M., & Sosa, I. (2026). Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Optimal Robotic System Selection in 3D Concrete Printing. Buildings, 16(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16010202

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop