Next Article in Journal
Demonstration of 3D-Printed Concrete Containing Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates (fCAs) and Recycled Concrete Powder (RCP): Rheology, Early-Age, Shrinkage, Mechanical, and Durability Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Temperature Control of Massive High-Strength Concrete Columns During Curing—A Case Study in Hong Kong
Previous Article in Special Issue
Constitutive Modeling of Coal Gangue Concrete with Integrated Global–Local Explainable AI and Finite Element Validation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Buildings
Volume 15
Issue 23
10.3390/buildings15234257
buildings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanical Characteristics Based on the Microstructure Analysis of Cementitious Composites Incorporating Polypropylene Powder

by
Jeonguk Mun
,
Dongwook Kim
,
Sunho Kang
and
Heeyoung Lee
*
Department of Civil Engineering, Chosun University, 10 Chosundae 1-gil, Dong-Gu, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(23), 4257; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234257
Submission received: 22 October 2025 / Revised: 14 November 2025 / Accepted: 22 November 2025 / Published: 25 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Building Materials and Designs for Sustainable Built Environment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Incorporating recycled plastics into construction materials offers environmental and economic benefits. This study examined the properties of cementitious composites incorporating recycled polypropylene (PP) powder to evaluate the feasibility of plastics as construction materials. Experimental parameters included PP content and a curing method. Ninety-six specimens were fabricated for compressive strength tests and 48 for flexural strength tests, with six specimens per parameter. The mechanical behavior of the PP cementitious composites was assessed through compressive and flexural strength tests alongside digital image correlation analysis. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) were used to analyze the pore structure of cementitious composites. Additionally, X-ray diffraction and thermogravimetric analysis examined the thermal and chemical characteristics. Compared with the control specimens, cementitious composites containing 30% PP exhibited approximately 30% reduction in compressive strength but a 28% increase in flexural strength. FE-SEM and MIP results revealed defects that deteriorated the performance of the cementitious composites. However, the compressive strengths exceeded 30 MPa across all the tested parameters, which is satisfactory for construction applications. Furthermore, the addition of PP enhanced flexural strength, providing structural benefits that render it a viable option for sustainable construction materials.

1. Introduction

Plastic is widely used across various fields owing to its excellent productivity and durability, with global annual production exceeding 400 million tons. However, according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Global Plastics Outlook report, only approximately 9% of plastic used globally is recycled [1]. The low recycling rates of plastic pose considerable risks, including environmental pollution and challenges in waste management [2]. Most plastic waste (PW) is either discarded in terrestrial and marine environments or ends up in landfills. The resulting micro and nano plastics harm ecosystems and disrupt global carbon cycling [3,4,5]. Additionally, plastic production contributes substantially to accelerating global warming, accounting for 5% of total carbon emissions [6]. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated existing plastic issues by driving up plastic usage through increased demand for personal protective equipment, food packaging/delivery services, and online shopping. This surge led to a substantial rise in plastic packaging use [7,8]. These consumption habits and lifestyles still persist today, with projections indicating that PW could triple by 2060 [9,10,11]. Therefore, proper treatment and management of the rapidly rising volume of PW is becoming increasingly critical.
Currently, numerous policies and studies on plastic recycling are actively being developed [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Incorporating plastic into construction materials is a promising approach [18,19]. The incorporation of plastic into construction materials provides environmental and economic benefits [20,21]. This method not only aids in environmental protection by reducing greenhouse gas emissions from plastic production but also creates new value for plastic as a sustainable construction resource [22,23,24,25]. Awoyera and Adesina [26] found that PW could be applied in various forms, such as subbase, asphalt, filler, walls, and bricks for road construction. Incorporating PW into cementitious composites offers a highly efficient method for waste utilization [27,28,29,30]. Siddique et al. [31] revealed that incorporating plastic into concrete improves resistance to impact and shrinkage cracks. Numerous studies used various types of plastic in cementitious composites, typically incorporating plastic as either aggregate or fiber [32,33]. The effects of plastic on cementitious composites have been analyzed through experiments assessing mechanical properties, chemical properties, and durability [34,35,36,37,38]. These studies show that factors such as mix ratio, type of plastic, and particle shape and size result in significant variability in the outcomes [39,40,41,42].
Previous studies have revealed that small particles with rough and irregular shapes enhance the strength of concrete [43,44]. Juki et al. [45] found that smaller polyethylene (PET) particles (1–16 mm) enhanced concrete strength, whereas a higher plastic content reduced density and strength due to the low density of plastic. Ismail and Al-Hashmi [46] indicated that higher sand replacement rates decreased both compressive and flexural strength, with flexural strength decreasing by up to 30.5% compared to that of the control specimen. Mohammed et al. [47] showed that replacing up to 30% of aggregates with PVC (0.49–0.95 mm) caused less than an 8% strength loss while improving toughness, crack resistance, and wear resistance. Saxena et al. [48] reported that PET aggregates (0–20 mm) maintained compressive strength losses below 10% when the fine aggregate replacement was <10%, while significantly enhancing energy absorption (up to 421% and 378% increases at 20% fine and coarse replacements were observed, respectively). Similarly, Gesoglu et al. [49] found that PVC powder replacements of up to 25% of the cement weight maintained compressive strengths above 45 MPa. Overall, plastic with smaller particle sizes and optimized mixing ratios can improve the performance of cementitious composites.
Yin et al. [50] found that incorporating plastic fibers in concrete is effective in controlling crack formation resulting from the dry shrinkage of concrete, thereby preventing sudden failure [51]. In particular, polypropylene (PP) fibers exhibit high resistance to alkaline environments, contributing to long-term durability. Additionally, PP fibers offer both environmental and economic advantages over steel fibers while also significantly reducing work time.
Orouji et al. [52] reported that incorporating 1.5% PP fibers maximized compressive and flexural strength, with specimens showing 7.3-times greater deformation than controls. Fraternali et al. [53] found that PET and PP fibers improved heat resistance, strength, and toughness, with PET fibers increasing compressive strength by 11.07 MPa. Ghernouti et al. [54] showed that waste vinyl fibers increased compressive strength by up to 13% and flexural strength by up to 14% depending on the fiber length, though shorter fibers had little effect. Overall, plastic fibers enhance the strength, ductility, and fracture resistance of concrete.
The hydrophobic nature of plastic interferes with the interaction between plastic and cement, which reduces the strength and performance of cementitious composites [55]. To address this issue, previous studies have investigated the addition of admixtures to plastic-containing concrete or treating the plastic before mixing [56]. Ali et al. [57] showed that adding silica fume mitigated the strength loss in plastic-containing concrete, increasing the compressive strength from 32.78 to 40.34 MPa by incorporating 20% plastic and 20% silica fume. Albano et al. [58] found that the flexural strength improved by 10% at 200 °C but declined at higher temperatures. Naik et al. [59] and Abbas et al. [60] reported that chemical and surface treatments involving high-density polyethylene (HDPE) enhanced matrix–plastic bonding, increasing the mechanical strength by 5–10%. This improvement was attributed to enhanced adhesion between the matrix and the plastic, which became hydrophilic owing to the sand coating.
Despite considerable advancements in incorporating various types of plastics into construction materials, most existing studies have primarily focused on PET, polyethylene (PE), and PVC. High-purity PP can be extracted from PW using solvent extraction methods [61]. PP is known for high toughness, flexibility, and substantial elongation capacity, which enables it to withstand considerable deformation. PP can absorb energy from cracking and inhibit crack propagation, thereby enhancing the overall durability and flexural strength of cementitious composites [62,63,64,65,66]. However, PP remains underexplored despite its high recycling potential [67]. Prior research primarily examined PP fibers and aggregates, focusing on their mechanical reinforcement capabilities in concrete. By contrast, limited research has addressed the use of PP powder derived from PW. PP in fiber form necessitates mechanical or thermal processing before being incorporated in cementitious composites. This processing can lead to changes in the physical and chemical structures of the material, potentially diminishing mechanical performance and altering surface characteristics. Additionally, the production of fibers increases process cost, which can reduce economic productivity in large-scale construction. By contrast, using PP powder enables direct incorporation without extensive processing. Reduced processing minimizes structural degradation of the polymer and lowers overall production costs. Utilizing PP powder derived from PW offers a practical alternative for enhancing both the economic and environmental performance of cementitious composites.
Understanding the influence of PP powder on the hydration process of cementitious composites is crucial for effective application. The effects of PP powder on cement hydration depend on curing conditions and incorporation rate, which influence the extent of hydration, pore structure development, and matrix development. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the interaction between PP and hydration processes based on the curing method and the role of microstructural changes in increasing or decreasing the strength. Cementitious composites (hereafter referred to as PP cementitious composites) were fabricated with varying PP content and curing methods. Most previous studies have typically incorporated relatively small amounts of plastic into cementitious composites, usually less than 10% by weight of cement. However, in this study, PP powder was added at levels of up to 30% by weight of cement to explore the effects of high-volume incorporation. Admixtures were incorporated to enhance the strength of the PP cementitious composite [68]. Compressive and flexural strength tests evaluated the effects of PP powder on the mechanical characteristics of the cementitious composite. Digital image correlation (DIC) was used to analyze micro-deformation and cracking in the PP cementitious composite. Internal structure analysis was conducted to investigate the factors contributing to changes in the microstructure of the PP cementitious composite, as well as the effects of PP on the hydration reaction of the composite. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were conducted. Finally, the effects of experimental parameters and materials on the characteristics of the PP cementitious composite were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

2. Experimental Programs

2.1. Fabrication of Specimens

The composition ratios of the PP cementitious composite used in this study are presented in Table 1. The materials in the specimens included Type 1 Portland cement, No. 6 silica sand (0.35–0.7 mm), and PP powder. In this study, PP powder with a particle size range of 50–300 μm was used. This range was selected considering that the mechanical and microstructural properties of cementitious composites are sensitive to the particle size of PP powder. This range is readily obtainable through conventional industrial milling and sieving processes, and the particle size is comparable to that of cement and sand. Therefore, PP particles in this range are less likely to interfere with cement hydration and dispersion within the composite matrix. Silica fume was used to compensate for the expected strength reduction in the PP cementitious composite due to the inclusion of plastic. Table 2 lists the chemical properties of silica fume. A superplasticizer was used to ensure flowability and improve the workability of the cementitious composite. Each admixture complied with ASTM C1240-20 and ASTM C494 regulations [69,70].
Figure 1 illustrates the particle morphology of PP. The PP particles have thin, elongated structures with smooth surfaces [71] and exhibit a slightly porous structure. The material properties of the PP powder are presented in Table 3 [72,73,74,75,76,77].
The parameters considered for specimen production were PP incorporation rate, curing method, and curing period. Table 4 lists the corresponding parameter values pertaining to the mechanical experiments. Specimen names were assigned according to the test type, PP content, and curing method. “C” and “F” represent the test type, with “C” indicating a compressive strength test and “F” denoting a flexural strength test. “PP” signifies the incorporation of PP, while the numbers “0,” “10,” “20,” and “30” correspond to the ratio of the PP powder content relative to the cement weight. “R” and “H” indicate the curing methods, with “R” representing the room temperature (RT)-cured specimens and “H” indicating the HT-cured specimens. RT curing was conducted at 23 ± 2 °C, whereas high-temperature (HT) curing was first conducted in a chamber at 200 °C for 2 h and then followed by RT curing. To promote the hydration of cementitious composite and induce physical bonding between the cement matrix and PP powder, HT curing was conducted at 200 °C, exceeding the melting point of PP. A PP cementitious composite (containing 20% PP powder) used for compressive strength testing and cured under HT conditions is designated as “C-PP-20H.”
The water/cement ratio of the PP cementitious composite was 0.4, and the cement-to-sand ratio was 1:2. Control specimens used for comparison with the PP cementitious composite were made using only cement and sand. The PP powder incorporation ratios were 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30% relative to the cement weight. A total of 144 specimens were fabricated, with six specimens per parameter. Overall, 96 specimens were prepared for compressive strength tests and 48 specimens for flexural strength tests.
The curing periods of specimens for compressive strength were set at 7 and 28 d. The curing period of specimens for flexural strength was 28 d. The specimens for the compressive strength test were prepared with dimensions of 50   m m × 50   m m × 50   m m , in accordance with ASTM C109 regulations [78]. For the flexural test, specimens were fabricated with dimensions of 40   m m × 40   m m × 160   m m , in accordance with ASTM C348 regulations [79].
Figure 2 provides an overview of the specimen manufacturing process for strength tests. Figure 2a illustrates the materials required for specimen production. As illustrated in Figure 2b, cement, sand, PP powder, and silica fume were dry mixed in a mixer bowl for 5 min. Subsequently, water or a mixture of water and superplasticizer was added and mixed for 3 min, as presented in Figure 2c. As shown in Figure 2d, the mixture was compacted into appropriate molds. The compacted specimens were then cured in molds for 1 d, as illustrated in Figure 2e. RT or HT curing was then conducted according to the specified periods. These two curing methods were employed to examine the hardening characteristics of the cementitious composite based on the temperature.

2.2. Mechanical Characteristics of the Specimens

Compressive and flexural strength tests investigated the effects of the curing method and PP powder incorporation on the overall mechanical performance of cementitious composites. Figure 3 presents the longitudinal section of the cementitious composite subjected to the mechanical strength tests, while Figure 4 shows the setup for the mechanical testing.
The mechanical strength of the cementitious composite was tested using a universal testing machine with a 1000 kN capacity. In accordance with ASTM C109 [78], the compressive strength was measured using a displacement control method at a loading rate of 1 mm/min. The flexural strength of the cementitious composite was measured using a three-point bending test, with a loading rate of 50 N/s in accordance with ASTM C348 [79]. Rollers, placed at 100 mm intervals, were used to support the specimen. The compressive strength and flexural strength of the cementitious composite, measured through the three-point bending test, were calculated using the following equations.
f c = P A
f r = 3 P L 2 b d 2
where f c denotes compressive strength, P denotes the maximum load applied during failure and A represents the cross-sectional area of the material resisting the load.   f r represents flexural strength, L denotes the span of the specimen, b represents the specimen width, and d represents the specimen height.
Figure 4b presents the setup for the flexural test and DIC analysis. DIC analysis was used to visualize crack behavior under the three-point bending load. The distribution of deformation in the specimen was precisely measured through real-time monitoring. For smooth DIC tracking, a speckled pattern was applied to the surface of the specimen using a spray. An LED light source was used to uniformly illuminate the specimen, enhancing the precision of DIC analysis. A high-speed camera recorded the deformation process of the specimen over time at a rate of 5 fps. Mercury RT software version.3.0.12 was employed to analyze the experimental data [80].

2.3. Internal Structure Analysis Methods

Figure 5 shows the equipment used for internal structure analysis of PP cementitious composites. The internal structure was examined across different PP contents and curing methods, focusing on specimens that demonstrated the highest results in the 28 d strength tests. FE-SEM and MIP experiments examined the pore structure of the PP cementitious composites. Additionally, the chemical and thermal properties of the PP cementitious composite were analyzed through XRD and TGA experiments.

2.3.1. FE-SEM Test Method

FE-SEM SU8600 observed the structure of PP, while FE-SEM S-4800 observed the microstructure, bonding conditions, and other characteristics of the specimens (Figure 5a). Before testing, dust was removed from the specimens, and specimens were then coated with platinum to improve conductivity. The specimens were viewed at high magnifications in accordance with ISO 19749 [81]. The high-resolution images obtained from FE-SEM provide detailed insights into microdefects and phase distribution within the specimens.

2.3.2. MIP Test Method

AutoPore V 9620 was used to analyze the influences of curing methods and PP on the pore structure of the cementitious composite (Figure 5b). The porosity and pore size distribution of the PP cementitious composite were evaluated by measuring the amount of mercury that intruded into the pores under various pressures. The pressure and pore size ranges were 3.45 kPa–413.69 MPa and 0.003–500 μm, respectively. The contact angle was in the range of 130–140°. The pore diameter was calculated using the Washburn equation [82,83]:
d = − 4 γ cos θ P
where d denotes pore diameter, γ represents the surface tension of mercury, θ denotes the contact angle, and P represents mercury penetration pressure.

2.3.3. XRD Test Method

XRD experiments were performed using the X’Pert PRO system to analyze the effects of PP incorporation and curing methods on hydrate formation in the cementitious composite. X-ray radiation was applied at 40 kV and 40 mA, in accordance with ASTM E915-96, and 2θ scanning was performed in the range of 10–80° (Figure 5c) [84].

2.3.4. TGA Test Method

TGA experiments were conducted in accordance with ASTM C1872 by heating specimens at a rate of 10 °C/min over a temperature range of 25–1000 °C [85]. Mass changes were measured as the specimens thermally decomposed with increasing temperature. The TGA 2050 analyzed the thermal characteristics of the PP cementitious composite by measuring the mass changes in the specimens (Figure 5d).

2.4. Pearson Correlation Analysis

The relationship between the compressive and flexural strength of cementitious composites and the various influencing variables was analyzed by quantifying correlation. The range of the Pearson correlation coefficient was from −1 to 1. The closer the value is to 0, the weaker the correlation, while −1 and 1 indicate strong negative correlation and positive correlation, respectively. The dataset comprised five input variables and two output variables. The input variables affecting the strength of the cementitious composite were curing days, PP content, silica fume, sand, and superplasticizer. The output variables were compressive strength and flexural strength.

3. Experimental Results and Discussion

3.1. Mechanical Characteristics of PP Cementitious Composites

3.1.1. Compressive Strength and Trend Analysis

Figure 6 illustrates how the compressive strength of PP cementitious composites varies with changes in PP content and curing method. The error bars represent the standard deviations calculated from measurements of six specimens tested using each compressive strength test. Generally, irrespective of curing methods, the compressive strength of the cementitious composite tends to decrease as the PP content increases. The trendlines in Figure 6 confirm a consistent decrease in compressive strength with increasing PP content, regardless of the curing method or period. The 28 d compressive strength of C-Control-R and C-Control-H, without PP incorporation, was 45.84 and 48.22 MPa, respectively. The 28 d compressive strength of C-PP-10R and C-PP-10H, with 10% PP incorporation, was 42.47 and 41.58 MPa, respectively, which is 85% of that of the Control specimen. The compressive strength of C-PP-30R and C-PP-30H, with the maximum PP incorporation, was 33.12 and 32.38 MPa, respectively. The decrease in compressive strength in these cementitious composites is attributed to the adhesion problem between plastic and cement paste caused by the hydrophobicity of the plastic. However, the compressive strength of all specimens remained above 30 MPa when appropriate admixtures were used. A compressive strength exceeding 30 MPa is considered sufficient for use in construction applications such as road pavement, indicating that a cementitious composite containing 30% PP can be suitably utilized.
The compressive strength of the RT-cured PP cementitious material increased by up to 20% as the curing period extended. By contrast, the compressive strength of the HT-cured PP cementitious composite showed minimal change with an extended curing period. Compared to the PP cementitious composite cured at room temperature, the composite cured at HT exhibited higher compressive strength at 7 d but lower compressive strength at 28 d. The HT of 200 °C promotes early crystallization, enhancing early strength but reducing the long-term strength of the PP cementitious composite [86]. HT curing enhances early strength but induces microcracking via thermal expansion. These microstructural defects compromise the integrity of the matrix over time, leading to lower compressive strength at later ages compared to RT curing.

3.1.2. Flexural Strength and DIC Analysis

Figure 7 illustrates the flexural strength of PP cementitious composites cured for 28 d. The error bars represent the standard deviations calculated from measurements of six specimens tested using each flexural strength test. Under RT curing, the incorporation of PP increased the flexural strength of the cementitious composite. The flexural strength of F-PP-10R was 11.81 MPa, which is approximately 10% higher than that of the Control (10.74 MPa), while F-PP-30R exhibited a flexural strength of 13.75 MPa, showing an improvement of approximately 28% compared to the Control. Generally, the flexural strength of cementitious composites tends to be proportional to compressive strength [87,88,89,90]. However, the flexural strength of RT-cured PP cementitious composite was inversely proportional to compressive strength. The increase in flexural strength of PP cementitious composites under RT curing can be attributed to the high elongation rate of polypropylene, which allows the plastic to enhance the resistance to bending.
By contrast, the flexural strength of HT-cured PP cementitious composites decreased as the PP content increased. The flexural strengths of F-PP-10H, F-PP-20H, and F-PP-30H were 10.02, 9.83, and 9.78 MPa, respectively, which were up to 40% lower than that of the flexural strength of specimens cured at room temperature. This reduction may be attributed to the thermal degradation of PP at elevated temperatures (200 °C), which diminishes the reinforcing capability of PP within the cementitious composite. During HT curing, thermal expansion and contraction of PP can lead to deformation and non-uniform pore distribution within the matrix. Furthermore, the increase in temperature accelerates thermal degradation, resulting in a decline in the mechanical properties and durability of PP. Although the high elongation rate of PP enhances flexural strength under RT curing, this reinforcing function cannot be maintained effectively under HT curing owing to a combination of the aforementioned reasons.
The trend observed in the flexural strength results is supported by the DIC analysis. DIC analysis was used to monitor the flexural failure deformation of PP cementitious composites. Figure 8 presents the full-field strain distribution images of the composites, showing variations based on the curing method and incorporation rate. During the three-point bending test, compressive forces were applied to the upper part of the neutral axis of the specimen, while tensile forces acted on the lower part. Deformation in all specimens was concentrated around the middle of the span. The greatest deformation was observed close to the crack, which appeared at the lower central part of the specimen, aligning with the point of flexural failure. As shown in Figure 8a, cracks in specimens cured at room temperature propagated vertically in a straight line. Conversely, crack patterns in specimens cured at HTs were characterized by irregular curves. Figure 8b shows that the degree of bending increased with higher PP content. Under HT curing, PP exhibits thermal degradation and disperses irregularly within the cementitious composite. The non-uniformly distributed PP undergoes thermal shrinkage and expansion, resulting in the formation of uneven pores throughout the composite. These uneven pores disrupt the homogeneity of the matrix and contribute to the development of irregular crack patterns, as illustrated in Figure 8b. These internal defects weaken the stress transfer efficiency within the composite and reduce the ability of PP to resist flexural loads. Consequently, these factors are closely associated with the decrease in flexural strength observed in HT-cured specimens.

3.2. Internal Structure Analysis

3.2.1. FE-SEM

Using 5000× magnification FE-SEM images, the internal pores and hydrates of PP cementitious composites were examined in relation to PP incorporation and curing temperature. Specimens cured for 28 d were analyzed, and Figure 9 shows the FE-SEM image. Control-R and Control-H, without PP incorporation, exhibited abundant calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and dense internal structures. By contrast, as observed in previous studies, porous structures were present in all specimens containing PP. Belmokaddem et al. [91] analyzed pores resulting from poor adhesion between plastic and the cement matrix using FE-SEM. The interfacial transition zone and pores within PP cementitious composites, caused by the hydrophobic nature of plastic, were observed in several studies [92,93]. FE-SEM observations revealed a weak interfacial transition zone (ITZ) between the PP particles and the cement hydration products, characterized by localized debonding and micropore formation. This poor interface is attributed to the hydrophobic nature of PP, which inhibits effective chemical bonding.
Figure 9a illustrates that the frequency of micropores increases with higher PP content. In PP-30R and PP-30H, pores caused by poor bonding between plastic and cement paste become more prominent as the PP ratio increases. The internal structure of specimens cured at an HT exhibited distinct patterns compared to those cured at room temperature. While Figure 9a depicts small and uniformly sized pores, Figure 9b reveals a range of pore sizes and a relatively smooth surface. Plastic does not physically or chemically interact with cement paste owing to its hydrophobic nature. However, HT (200 °C), exceeding the melting point of PP (130–171 °C), enables physical bonding between plastic and cement paste by imparting liquid-like properties to the plastic. Consequently, PP-10H, PP-20H, and PP-30H specimens exhibited smoother surfaces. Moreover, at HT curing, PP undergoes shrinkage and expansion during the melting and hardening processes, which facilitates physical bonding with the cement paste. The resulting variation in pore sizes (small and large) within PP cementitious composites is responsible for the diverse-sized pores depicted in Figure 9b, as compared to the more uniform pore sizes illustrated in Figure 9a. While physical bonding between PP and the cement paste can enhance the strength and internal structure of the composite, the detrimental effects of micropores outweigh these benefits, significantly impacting the overall strength of the PP cementitious composite.

3.2.2. MIP

The pore structure of PP cementitious composites observed through FE-SEM was further verified through MIP experiments, which measured specimen porosity under various parameters. Figure 10 illustrates the relationship between the 28 d compressive strength and porosity of the PP cementitious composite. Consistent with the FE-SEM images, the results indicated that the porosity of the PP cementitious composite increased with higher PP content. The porosity of PP-30 increased by approximately 60% compared to that of the Control specimen. This increase in porosity is attributed to poor contact and interference with hydrate formation owing to the hydrophobicity of the plastic. Furthermore, specimens cured at HT exhibited 2–4% higher porosity compared to those cured at room temperature. The growth of these interconnected pores reduces the load-bearing continuity of the cementitious matrix, directly explaining the observed decrease in compressive strength.
Generally, the porosity of cementitious composite is inversely proportional to compressive strength, as observed in previous studies [94,95]. The porosity of PP cementitious composites in this study followed the same trend. In addition to porosity, the pore size distribution also plays a substantial role in determining the properties of cementitious composites [96]. Figure 11 illustrates the pore size distribution within the total pore volume. In this study, pores were categorized based on size into four types: gel pores (<10 nm), medium capillary pores (10–50 nm), large capillary pores (50–1000 nm), and macro pores (>1000 nm). Among these, large capillary pores and macro pores exceeding 50 nm are considered detrimental to the performance of cementitious composites and are classified as harmful pores [97,98].
The pore structure of the Control specimen was dense, with a relatively uniform distribution of pore sizes. Control-R and Control-H, which did not incorporate PP, contained 24–28% gel pores, attributed to the high content of C-S-H gel. By contrast, the pore structure of specimens incorporating PP was predominantly characterized by macro pores. For instance, PP-10R exhibited 15.7% gel pores and 48.1% macro pores, with the gel pore ratio being nearly halved and a significant increase in the macro pore ratio compared to Control-R. While the overall pore structure of cementitious composite was not substantially influenced by the curing method, specimens cured at HT exhibited a 3–4% higher macro pore ratio.
These results clearly demonstrate the effects of PP incorporation on the pore structure of cementitious composites, corroborating the FE-SEM findings. As PP content increased, the porosity of the cementitious composite increased, along with the proportion of harmful pores. This increase in both porosity and the harmful pore ratio contributed to the reduction in compressive strength. In particular, macro pores accounted for the highest proportion of the pore structure of the PP cementitious composite. As a result of analyzing the pore structures of the cementitious composites via the mechanical strength test, macro pores were determined to be a major factor affecting the reduction in the strength of the PP cementitious composites.

3.2.3. XRD Analysis

The XRD analysis verified the amount of hydrate and investigated the effect of hydration on the mechanical properties of PP cementitious composites. To investigate the causes of strength variations in cementitious composites owing to PP incorporation and curing temperature, specimens without PP (Control-R and Control-H) and those with maximum PP content (PP-30R and PP-30H) were analyzed. Figure 12 presents the XRD patterns of specimens. The 2θ angles corresponding to the observed peaks were similar across all specimens. Silica peaks were consistently present in all patterns, with prominent peaks around 27°. Additionally, calcium hydroxide (C-H) and C-S-H peaks appeared at uniform angles, with no evidence of new crystalline phases caused by the addition of PP. The absence of chemical interaction between PP and the cement paste confirms that changes in the mechanical properties of the PP cementitious composite are primarily attributed to physical and microstructural alterations rather than chemical reactions.
While the XRD patterns of all specimens were generally similar, differences in peak intensity and composition were observed depending on the presence of plastic and curing temperature. The XRD peaks of specimens incorporating PP were reduced, which can be attributed to the hydrophobic nature of the plastic. Weak calcite peaks were identified around 27° in Control-R and Control-H but were absent in PP-30R and PP-30H, indicating that the plastic interfered with the hydration reaction. The HT promoted hydration and increased the amount of hydration products. Tobermorite was observed only in HT-cured specimens (Control-H and PP-30H). In general, an increase in hydration products tends to enhance the strength of cementitious composites; however, factors such as pore structure, cracking, and non-uniform dispersion negatively affect the mechanical strength of the composite.

3.2.4. TGA

TGA was performed to examine the thermal characteristics of PP cementitious composites. Figure 13 presents the weight loss graph as a function of temperature. Each specimen exhibited mass reduction in three distinct stages. The first stage, occurring between 80 and 150 °C, resulted in approximately 3% weight loss due to water evaporation and C-S-H dehydration. The second stage commenced at 400 °C, where rapid mass reduction was noted owing to the decomposition of Portlandite. During this phase, the decomposition of the PP powder between 400 and 480 °C further contributed to weight loss. The final stage began at 750 °C, where the release of CO2 from the thermal decomposition of CaCO3 caused additional mass reduction, which continued up to 1000 °C. The highest weight loss observed was in PP-30R, which reached 17%.
TGA results indicated that the partial decomposition of PP increased the thermal weight loss of PP cementitious composites. HT curing accelerated dehydration and partial decomposition of hydration products, such as C-S-H and CH, during the curing process. This change reduced the amount of water remaining in the cement matrix. As a result, HT-cured specimens exhibited lower thermal weight loss compared to RT-cured specimens during the TGA test.

3.3. Pearson Correlation Analysis of the PP Cementitious Composites

Figure 14 presents the Pearson correlation coefficients between input variables and the strength properties of cementitious composites. The analysis was conducted without normalization to preserve the original relationships among variables. The correlation between curing duration and flexural strength was excluded because the flexural strength test was performed at a fixed curing age of 28 d.
The compressive strength shows a moderately strong negative correlation with PP content (r = −0.62) in Figure 14a, indicating that an increase in PP content reduces compressive performance. The microstructural analysis demonstrated that the presence of PP interferes with cement hydration and induces pore formation, which explains the observed decrease in compressive strength. The correlation between PP content and flexural strength is positive (r = 0.17). While the incorporation of PP impairs hydration and lowers flexural performance, the presence of PP contributes to localized deformation control and supports load transfer during bending. Silica fume shows a weakly positive correlation with compressive strength (r = 0.05), attributed to the pozzolanic reaction that facilitates secondary gel formation and matrix densification. Superplasticizer exhibits a positive correlation with compressive strength (r = 0.06). Increased workability resulting from superplasticizer usage promotes hydration and matrix development. The curing duration demonstrates a positive correlation with the compressive strength (r = 0.44), reflecting continuous hydration under RT curing.
In Figure 14b, the negative correlation between PP content and compressive strength is less pronounced (r = −0.59). Although thermal degradation due to HT curing typically reduces compressive strength, the strength loss appears partially offset by the accelerated hydration and enhanced pozzolanic reaction under elevated temperatures. By comparison, the positive correlation between curing duration and compressive strength is less pronounced (r = 0.44). Exposure to 200 °C causes significant moisture loss in the cementitious composite, which limits hydration owing to insufficient water during the curing period. PP content and flexural strength show a weak negative correlation owing to the deterioration of PP (r = −0.08). HT curing leads to microstructural degradation of the cementitious composite, including increased internal porosity and shrinkage-induced cracking. Silica fume and sand show relatively strong positive correlations with compressive strength. The S i O 2 in silica fume and sand enhances the pozzolanic reaction, which is further activated by elevated temperature, resulting in improved strength of the cementitious composite [99]. Superplasticizer also shows a positive correlation with compressive strength (r = 0.31), which is consistent with enhanced fluidity and reduced void formation in the matrix.
The PP content exhibits a strong negative correlation with compressive strength (r = −0.62), indicating that the compressive strength can be preserved by limiting the amount of incorporated PP. By contrast, under RT curing, the PP content shows a weak positive correlation with flexural strength (r = 0.17), suggesting that the flexural performance can be enhanced by increasing PP incorporation to an appropriate level. Therefore, the PP content in cementitious composites should be strategically adjusted to balance compressive and flexural strengths. Moreover, the correlation analysis reveals that curing temperature has a significant impact on the strength development of PP cementitious composites. Elevated temperatures can enhance strength through accelerated hydration and improved pozzolanic reactions; however, they may also impair mechanical properties owing to matrix degradation and microstructural defects. Therefore, selecting an appropriate curing method is essential to ensure the reliable performance of PP cementitious composites.

4. Conclusions

In this study, compressive and flexural strength tests were conducted to evaluate the mechanical characteristics of PP cementitious composites. Additionally, crack patterns were examined using DIC analysis. FE-SEM, MIP, XRD, and TGA were used to analyze the effects of different parameters on the internal structure of the PP cementitious composites. Finally, overall trends regarding the effects of PP powder on the cementitious composite were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient and machine learning approaches. The main conclusions are as follows:
  • Increased PP content reduced compressive strength under all curing conditions owing to poor bonding and interruption of hydration. HT curing accelerated early strength but decreased long-term strength because of microcracks and porosity.
  • At RT curing, PP enhanced the flexural strength of a cementitious composite by up to 28%. Under HT curing, degradation of the PP and cement matrix reduced flexural strength by up to 40%. DIC analysis revealed irregular cracks resulting from uneven pore distribution and thermal deformation.
  • FE-SEM and MIP confirmed increased porosity and altered pore structure with PP addition. HT curing resulted in the formation of multi-scale pores and defects due to PP shrinkage and expansion, lowering structural integrity. As a result, the compressive strength of the PP cementitious composite decreased by up to 30%.
  • XRD results indicated that PP did not chemically react with the components of the cementitious composite and interfered with hydrate formation. The HT promoted hydration, but the resulting products did not improve mechanical strength owing to microstructural defects in the cementitious composite. TGA revealed greater weight loss with higher PP content owing to thermal decomposition and reduced hydration.
  • Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the overall effect of parameters on cementitious composites. Curing temperature significantly affected hydration, pore structure, and overall strength development. Ensuring the desired performance of cementitious composites in specific structural or environmental applications requires careful selection of the curing method.
  • With the use of suitable admixtures, the compressive strength of PP cementitious composites exceeded 30 MPa across all tested parameters. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing the mix design to balance mechanical performance and sustainability, ensuring that the incorporation of PP provides environmental benefits while minimizing impact on structural integrity.
Overall, these results suggest that cementitious composites incorporating plastic may be viable construction materials for applications such as road pavements, bridge slabs, and piers. However, the durability of PP cementitious composites, including their resistance to carbonation, freeze–thaw cycles, shrinkage, chloride ion penetration, and life cycle performance, was not evaluated in this study. Without such assessments, the long-term performance and reliability of PP cementitious composites in real-world structural applications remain uncertain. Therefore, future studies will focus on comprehensive durability evaluations to determine the applicability of these composites in practical construction environments.

Author Contributions

J.M.: Conceptualization, Writing and Editing; D.K.: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing—Original draft preparation; S.K.: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing—Original draft preparation; H.L.: Writing and Editing, Project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a project for Collabo R&D between the Industry, University, and Research Institute funded by the Korea Ministry of SMEs and Startups in 2025 (RS-2025-02314369), and by the Regional Innovation System & Education (RISE) program through the Gwangju RISE Center, funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) and the Gwangju Metropolitan City, Republic of Korea (2025-RISE-05-013).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Global Plastics Outlook: Policy Scenarios to 2060; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. MacLeod, M.; Arp, H.P.H.; Tekman, M.B.; Jahnke, A. The global threat from plastic pollution. Science 2021, 373, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ivar do Sul, J.A.I.I.; Costa, M.F. The present and future of microplastic pollution in the marine environment. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 185, 352–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thushari, G.G.N.; Senevirathna, J.D.M. Plastic pollution in the marine environment. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shen, M.; Huang, W.; Chen, M.; Song, B.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, Y. plastic crisis: Unignorable contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stegmann, P.; Daioglou, V.; Londo, M.; van Vuuren, D.P.; Junginger, M. Plastic futures and their CO2 emissions. Nature 2022, 612, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schlegel, I.; Gibson, C. The Making of an Echo Chamber: How the Plastic Industry Exploited Anxiety About COVID-19 to Attack Reusable Bags. 2020. Available online: https://trashhero.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/The-Making-of-an-Echo-Chamber_-How-the-plastic-industry-exploited-anxiety-about-COVID-19-to-attack-reusable-bags-1.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2020).
  8. Prata, J.C.; Silva, A.L.P.; Walker, T.R.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T. COVID-19 pandemic repercussions on the use and management of plastics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 7760–7765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shams, M.; Alam, I.; Mahbub, M.S. Plastic pollution during COVID-19: Plastic waste directives and its long-term impact on the environment. Environ. Adv. 2021, 5, 100119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Patrício Silva, A.L.P.P.; Prata, J.C.; Walker, T.R.; Duarte, A.C.; Ouyang, W.; Barcelò, D.; Rocha-Santos, T. Increased plastic pollution due to COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and recommendations. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lebreton, L.; Andrady, A. Future scenarios of global plastic waste generation and disposal. Palgrave Commun. 2019, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yaqub, W.; Aslani, F. Mechanical properties and fire resistance of 3D-printed cementitious composites with plastic waste. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2024, 18, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Da Costa, J.P.; Mouneyrac, C.; Costa, M.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T. The role of legislation, regulatory initiatives and guidelines on the control of plastic pollution. Front. Environ. Sci. 2020, 8, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Adam, I.; Walker, T.R.; Bezerra, J.C.; Clayton, A. Policies to reduce single-use plastic marine pollution in West Africa. Mar. Policy 2020, 116, 103928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Thiounn, T.; Smith, R.C. Advances and approaches for chemical recycling of plastic waste. J. Pol. Sci. 2020, 58, 1347–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Babafemi, A.J.; Norval, C.; Kolawole, J.T.; Chandra Paul, S.C.; Ibrahim, K.A. 3D-printed limestone calcined clay cement concrete incorporating recycled plastic waste (RESIN8). Results Eng. 2024, 22, 102112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bharadwaaj, S.K.; Jaudan, M.; Kushwaha, P.; Saxena, A.; Saha, B. Exploring cutting-edge approaches in plastic recycling for a greener future. Results Eng. 2024, 23, 102704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Duan, Z.; Deng, Q.; Liang, C.; Ma, Z.; Wu, H. Upcycling of recycled plastic fiber for sustainable cementitious composites: A critical review and new perspective. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 142, 105192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, L.; Yan, C.; Zhang, N.; Farooqi, M.U.; Xu, S.; Deifalla, A.F. Flexural fracture parameters of polypropylene fiber reinforced geopolymer. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 24, 1839–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ramos, F.J.H.T.V.; Reis, R.H.M.; Grafova, I.; Grafov, A.; Monteiro, S.N. Eco-friendly recycled polypropylene matrix composites incorporated with geopolymer concrete waste particles. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 3084–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Almeshal, I.; Tayeh, B.A.; Alyousef, R.; Alabduljabbar, H.; Mohamed, A.M. Eco-friendly concrete containing recycled plastic as partial replacement for sand. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 4631–4643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Adesina, A. Recent advances in the concrete industry to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions. Environ. Chall. 2020, 1, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zulkernain, N.H.; Gani, P.; Chuck Chuan, N.C.C.; Uvarajan, T. Utilisation of plastic waste as aggregate in construction materials: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 296, 123669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vijayan, V.; Manthos, E.; Mantalovas, K.; Di Mino, G. Multi-recyclability of asphalt mixtures modified with recycled plastic: Towards a circular economy. Results Eng. 2024, 23, 102523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wetchakornborirak, K.; Prommanee, P.; Supakata, N. Characteristics of aerogel-incorporated concrete with polyethylene terephthalate fiber. Results Eng. 2025, 27, 107135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Awoyera, P.O.; Adesina, A. Plastic wastes to construction products: Status, limitations and future perspective. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2020, 12, e00330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Al-Tayeb, M.M.; Aisheh, Y.I.A.; Qaidi, S.M.A.; Tayeh, B.A. Experimental and simulation study on the impact resistance of concrete to replace high amounts of fine aggregate with plastic waste. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 17, e01324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ahdal, A.Q.; Amrani, M.A.; Ghaleb, A.A.A.; Abadel, A.A.; Alghamdi, H.; Alamri, M.; Wasim, M.; Shameeri, M. Mechanical performance and feasibility analysis of green concrete prepared with local natural zeolite and waste PET plastic fibers as cement replacements. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 17, e01256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Agyeman, S.; Obeng-Ahenkora, N.K.; Assiamah, S.; Twumasi, G. Exploiting recycled plastic waste as an alternative binder for paving blocks production. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2019, 11, e00246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Blazy, J.; Blazy, R. Polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete and its application in creating architectural forms of public spaces. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021, 14, e00549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Siddique, R.; Khatib, J.; Kaur, I. Use of recycled plastic in concrete: A review. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 1835–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mustafa, M.A.T.; Hanafi, I.; Mahmoud, R.; Tayeh, B.A. Effect of partial replacement of sand by plastic waste on impact resistance of concrete: Experiment and simulation. Structures 2019, 20, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ochi, T.; Okubo, S.; Fukui, K. Development of recycled PET fiber and its application as concrete-reinforcing fiber. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2007, 29, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Silva, R.V.; de Brito, J.; Saikia, N. Influence of curing conditions on the durability-related performance of concrete made with selected plastic waste aggregates. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2013, 35, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Feng, H.; Shao, Q.; Yao, X.; Li, L.; Yuan, C. Investigating the Hybrid Effect of Micro-steel Fibres and Polypropylene Fibre-Reinforced Magnesium Phosphate Cement Mortar. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2022, 16, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Arulrajah, A.; Yaghoubi, E.; Wong, Y.C.; Horpibulsuk, S. Recycled plastic granules and demolition wastes as construction materials: Resilient moduli and strength characteristics. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 147, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Marzouk, O.Y.; Dheilly, R.M.; Queneudec, M. Valorization of post-consumer waste plastic in cementitious concrete composites. Waste Manag. 2007, 27, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aneke, F.I.; Shabangu, C. Green-efficient masonry bricks produced from scrap plastic waste and foundry sand. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021, 14, e00515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kangavar, M.E.; Lokuge, W.; Manalo, A.; Karunasena, W.; Frigione, M. Investigation on the properties of concrete with recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) granules as fine aggregate replacement. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Akhmetov, D.; Akhazhanov, S.; Jetpisbayeva, A.; Pukharenko, Y.; Root, Y.; Utepov, Y.; Akhmetov, A. Effect of low-modulus polypropylene fiber on physical and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, S.B.; Yi, N.H.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, J.H.J.; Song, Y.C. Material and structural performance evaluation of recycled PET fiber reinforced concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2010, 32, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huynh, T.-P.; Ho Minh Le, T.; Vo Chau Ngan, N. An experimental evaluation of the performance of concrete reinforced with recycled fibers made from waste plastic bottles. Results Eng. 2023, 18, 101205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Thorneycroft, J.; Orr, J.; Savoikar, P.; Ball, R.J. Performance of structural concrete with recycled plastic waste as a partial replacement for sand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 161, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saikia, N.; De Brito, J. Mechanical properties and abrasion behaviour of concrete containing shredded PET bottle waste as a partial substitution of natural aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 52, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Juki, M.I.; Awang, M.; Annas, M.M.K.; Boon, K.H.; Othman, N.; Kadir, A.A.; Roslan, M.A.; Khalid, F.S. Relationship between compressive, splitting tensile and flexural strength of concrete containing granulated waste polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles as fine aggregate. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 795, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ismail, Z.Z.; Al-Hashmi, E.A. Use of waste plastic in concrete mixture as aggregate replacement. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 2041–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohammed, A.A.; Mohammed, I.I.; Mohammed, S.A. Some properties of concrete with plastic aggregate derived from shredded PVC sheets. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 201, 232–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saxena, R.; Siddique, S.; Gupta, T.; Sharma, R.K.; Chaudhary, S. Impact resistance and energy absorption capacity of concrete containing plastic waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 176, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gesoğlu, M.; Güneyisi, E.; Hansu, O.; Etli, S.; Alhassan, M. Mechanical and fracture characteristics of self-compacting concretes containing different percentage of plastic waste powder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 140, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yin, S.; Tuladhar, R.; Shi, F.; Combe, M.; Collister, T.; Sivakugan, N. Use of macro plastic fibres in concrete: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 93, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Balgourinejad, N.; Haghighifar, M.; Madandoust, R.; Charkhtab, S. Experimental study on mechanical properties, microstructural of lightweight concrete incorporating polypropylene fibers and metakaolin at high temperatures. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 18, 5238–5256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Orouji, M.; Zahrai, S.M.; Najaf, E. Effect of glass powder & polypropylene fibers on compressive and flexural strengths, toughness and ductility of concrete: An environmental approach. Structures 2021, 33, 4616–4628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fraternali, F.; Ciancia, V.; Chechile, R.; Rizzano, G.; Feo, L.; Incarnato, L. Experimental study of the thermo-mechanical properties of recycled PET fiber-reinforced concrete. Comput. Struct. 2011, 93, 2368–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ghernouti, Y.; Rabehi, B.; Bouziani, T.; Ghezraoui, H.; Makhloufi, A. Fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete containing plastic bag waste fibers (WFSCC). Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 82, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Al-Kerttani, O.M.G.; Hilal, N.; Hama, S.M.; Sor, N.H.; Banyhussan, Q.S.; Tawfik, T.A. Durability and hardened characteristics of cement mortar incorporating waste plastic and polypropylene exposed to MgSO4 attack. Results Eng. 2024, 24, 103310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rhee, I.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, Y.A.; Kim, J.M. Mechanical properties of cement mortar with gamma-irradiated recycled plastic powder, pellet, and fiber. Results Eng. 2023, 20, 101614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ali, K.; Qureshi, M.I.; Saleem, S.; Khan, S.U. Effect of waste electronic plastic and silica fume on mechanical properties and thermal performance of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 285, 122952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Albano, C.; Camacho, N.; Hernández, M.; Matheus, A.; Gutiérrez, A. Influence of content and particle size of waste PET bottles on concrete behavior at different w/c ratios. Waste Manag. 2009, 29, 2707–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Naik, T.R.; Singh, S.S.; Huber, C.O.; Brodersen, B.S. Use of post-consumer waste plastics in cement-based composites. Cem. Concr. Res. 1996, 26, 1489–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Abbas, S.N.; Qureshi, M.I.; Abid, M.M.; Tariq, M.A.U.R.; Ng, A.W.M. An investigation of mechanical properties of concrete by applying sand coating on recycled high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and electronic-wastes (E-Wastes) used as a partial replacement of natural coarse aggregates. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Faraca, G.; Astrup, T. Plastic waste from recycling centres: Characterisation and evaluation of plastic recyclability. Waste Manag. 2019, 95, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhao, Y.B.; Lv, X.D.; Ni, H.G. Solvent-based separation and recycling of waste plastics: A review. Chemosphere 2018, 209, 707–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Banthia, N.; Gupta, R. Influence of polypropylene fiber geometry on plastic shrinkage cracking in concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 36, 1263–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yang, G.; Bi, J.; Dong, Z.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y. Experimental study on dynamic tensile properties of macro-polypropylene fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2022, 16, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shen, D.; Liu, C.; Luo, Y.; Shao, H.; Zhou, X.; Bai, S. Early-age autogenous shrinkage, tensile creep, and restrained cracking behavior of ultra-high-performance concrete incorporating polypropylene fibers. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 138, 104948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hassan, S.A.; Hanoon, A.N.; Abdulhameed, A.A. Push-out test of eco-friendly steel-concrete–steel composite sections enhanced by polypropylene fibers: An experimental study and statistical analysis. Results Eng. 2024, 23, 102393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rostami, R.; Zarrebini, M.; Mandegari, M.; Sanginabadi, K.; Mostofinejad, D.; Abtahi, S.M. The effect of concrete alkalinity on behavior of reinforcing polyester and polypropylene fibers with similar properties. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 97, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kang, S.; Pyo, S.; Lee, H. Thermal, electrical, and mechanical performances of ultrahigh-performance cementitious composites with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2024, 21, e03691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. ASTM C1240-20; Standard Specification for Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2003; Volume 15, pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
  70. ASTM C494/C494M-19e1; Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standards. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1999. [CrossRef]
  71. López-Buendía, A.M.; Romero-Sánchez, M.D.; Climent, V.; Guillem, C. Surface treated polypropylene (PP) fibres for reinforced concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2013, 54, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. ASTM D1238-10; Standard Test Method for Melt Flow Rates of Thermoplastics by Extrusion Plastometer. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2005.
  73. Astm Committee D-20; Standard Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Plastics by Displacement. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1991.
  74. ASTM D638-03; Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014.
  75. ASTM D790-15e2; Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015.
  76. ASTM D256-10; Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2010.
  77. ASTM D648; Standard Test Method for Deflection Temperature of Plastics Under Flexural Load in the Edgewise Position. Annual Book of ASTM Standards; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2007.
  78. ASTM C109; Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in, or [50-mm] cube specimens). Annual Book of ASTM Standards; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016.
  79. ASTM C 348-08; Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2008.
  80. Choi, E.; Ostadrahimi, A.; Kim, W.J. Enhancement of compressive strength and strain ductility of SMA fiber reinforced concrete considering fiber’s aspect ratios. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 345, 128346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. ISO 19749:2021; Nanotechnologies—Measurements of Particle Size and Shape Distributions by Scanning Electron Microscopy. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
  82. Washburn, E.W. Note on a method of determining the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1921, 7, 115–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lee, H.; Jeong, S.; Cho, S.; Chung, W. Enhanced bonding behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotube cement composites and reinforcing bars. Comput. Struct. 2020, 243, 112201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. ASTM E915–96; Test Method for Verifying the Alignment of X-Ray Diffraction Instrumentation for Residual Stress Measurement. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2002.
  85. ASTM C1872; Standard Test Method for Thermogravimetric Analysis of Hydraulic Cement. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018.
  86. Ma, Q.; Guo, R.; Zhao, Z.; Lin, Z.; He, K. Mechanical properties of concrete at high temperature—A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 93, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Köksal, F.; Altun, F.; Yiğit, İ.; Şahin, Y. Combined effect of silica fume and steel fiber on the mechanical properties of high strength concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 1874–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lee, J.H.; Cho, B.; Choi, E. Flexural capacity of fiber reinforced concrete with a consideration of concrete strength and fiber content. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 138, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Abbass, W.; Khan, M.I.; Mourad, S. Evaluation of mechanical properties of steel fiber reinforced concrete with different strengths of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 168, 556–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xu, B.W.; Shi, H.S. Correlations among mechanical properties of steel fiber reinforced concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 3468–3474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Belmokaddem, M.; Mahi, A.; Senhadji, Y.; Pekmezci, B.Y. Mechanical and physical properties and morphology of concrete containing plastic waste as aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 257, 119559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Abu-Saleem, M.; Zhuge, Y.; Hassanli, R.; Ellis, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Levett, P. Microwave radiation treatment to improve the strength of recycled plastic aggregate concrete. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021, 15, e00728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sáez del Bosque, I.F.; Zhu, W.; Howind, T.; Matías, A.; Sánchez de Rojas, M.I.; Medina, C. Properties of interfacial transition zones (ITZs) in concrete containing recycled mixed aggregate. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017, 81, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chan, Y.N.; Luo, X.; Sun, W. Compressive strength and pore structure of high-performance concrete after exposure to high temperature up to 800 °C. Cem. Concr. Res. 2000, 30, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Jin, S.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, X.; Sun, L. Quantitative relationship between pore size distribution and compressive strength of cementitious materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 273, 121727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mehta, P.K.; Monteiro, P. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  97. Silva, D.A.; John, V.M.; Ribeiro, J.L.D.; Roman, H.R. Pore size distribution of hydrated cement pastes modified with polymers. Cem. Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 1177–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, M.H.; Li, H. Pore structure and chloride permeability of concrete containing nano-particles for pavement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Seleem, H.E.H.; Rashad, A.M.; Elsokary, T. Effect of elevated temperature on physico-mechanical properties of blended cement concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 1009–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Buildings 15 04257 g001
Figure 1. PP particle: (a) PP powder used in the test and (b) FE-SEM image of the PP powder.
Figure 1. PP particle: (a) PP powder used in the test and (b) FE-SEM image of the PP powder.
Buildings 15 04257 g001
Buildings 15 04257 g002
Figure 2. Fabrication process of the PP cementitious composites: (a) preparation of materials, (b) dry mixing, (c) wet mixing, (d) compacting, (e) curing in a mold, and (f) curing in a chamber.
Figure 2. Fabrication process of the PP cementitious composites: (a) preparation of materials, (b) dry mixing, (c) wet mixing, (d) compacting, (e) curing in a mold, and (f) curing in a chamber.
Buildings 15 04257 g002
Buildings 15 04257 g003
Figure 3. Longitudinal view of mechanical strength testing of cementitious composites: (a) compressive strength and (b) flexural strength.
Figure 3. Longitudinal view of mechanical strength testing of cementitious composites: (a) compressive strength and (b) flexural strength.
Buildings 15 04257 g003
Buildings 15 04257 g004
Figure 4. Set up for mechanical characteristics testing: (a) compressive strength and (b) flexural strength and DIC system.
Figure 4. Set up for mechanical characteristics testing: (a) compressive strength and (b) flexural strength and DIC system.
Buildings 15 04257 g004
Buildings 15 04257 g005
Figure 5. Equipment used for internal structure analysis: (a) FE-SEM, (b) MIP, (c) XRD, and (d) TGA.
Figure 5. Equipment used for internal structure analysis: (a) FE-SEM, (b) MIP, (c) XRD, and (d) TGA.
Buildings 15 04257 g005
Buildings 15 04257 g006
Figure 6. Compressive strengths of the PP cementitious composites under different curing methods: (a) RT curing and (b) HT curing.
Figure 6. Compressive strengths of the PP cementitious composites under different curing methods: (a) RT curing and (b) HT curing.
Buildings 15 04257 g006
Buildings 15 04257 g007
Figure 7. Flexural strengths of the PP cementitious composites.
Figure 7. Flexural strengths of the PP cementitious composites.
Buildings 15 04257 g007
Buildings 15 04257 g008
Figure 8. DIC analysis of cracks in the PP cementitious composites: (a) RT curing and (b) HT curing.
Figure 8. DIC analysis of cracks in the PP cementitious composites: (a) RT curing and (b) HT curing.
Buildings 15 04257 g008
Buildings 15 04257 g009
Figure 9. FE-SEM images of the PP cementitious composites: (a) RT curing and (b) HT curing.
Figure 9. FE-SEM images of the PP cementitious composites: (a) RT curing and (b) HT curing.
Buildings 15 04257 g009
Buildings 15 04257 g010
Figure 10. Relationship between the porosity and compressive strength of the PP cementitious composites.
Figure 10. Relationship between the porosity and compressive strength of the PP cementitious composites.
Buildings 15 04257 g010
Buildings 15 04257 g011
Figure 11. Pore characteristics of the PP cementitious composites.
Figure 11. Pore characteristics of the PP cementitious composites.
Buildings 15 04257 g011
Buildings 15 04257 g012
Figure 12. XRD analysis of the PP cementitious composites.
Figure 12. XRD analysis of the PP cementitious composites.
Buildings 15 04257 g012
Buildings 15 04257 g013
Figure 13. TGA curves of the PP cementitious composites.
Figure 13. TGA curves of the PP cementitious composites.
Buildings 15 04257 g013
Buildings 15 04257 g014
Figure 14. Pearson correlation heatmap: (a) RT curing and (b) HT curing.
Figure 14. Pearson correlation heatmap: (a) RT curing and (b) HT curing.
Buildings 15 04257 g014
Table 1. Composition ratios of PP cementitious composites.
Table 1. Composition ratios of PP cementitious composites.
W/CCementSandSilica FumeSuperplasticizer
0.41.02.00.1250.005
Table 2. Chemical properties of silica fume.
Table 2. Chemical properties of silica fume.
Chemical Composition (%)
S i O 2 F e 2 O 3 CaO A l 2 O 3 MgO
Silica fume90.03.02.01.50.3
Table 3. Material properties of PP.
Table 3. Material properties of PP.
CategoryPropertyTest MethodUnitsValue
Physical propertiesMelt index (230 °C, 2.16 kg)ASTM D1238 [72]g/10 min27
DensityASTM D792 [73] kg / m 3 900
Mechanical propertiesYield stressASTM D638 [74]MPa22.6
ElongationASTM D638 [74]%<100
Flexural modulusASTM D790 [75]MPa1226
Impact propertiesIZOD impact strength (23 °C)ASTM D256 [76]J/m98
IZOD impact strength (−10 °C)ASTM D256 [76]J/m49
Thermal propertiesHeat deflection temperature ( 0.45   MPa ) ASTM D648 [77]°C105
Table 4. Test parameters.
Table 4. Test parameters.
Specimen NameTest TypePP Content (%)Curing MethodCuring Period
C-Control-RCompressive strength test0Room-temperature curing
(23 ± 2 °C)		7, 28
C-PP-10R10
C-PP-20R20
C-PP-30R30
C-Control-H0High-temperature curing
(200 °C)
C-PP-10H10
C-PP-20H20
C-PP-30H30
F-Control-RFlexural strength test0Room-temperature curing
(23 ± 2 °C)		28
F-PP-10R10
F-PP-20R20
F-PP-30R30
F-Control-H0High-temperature curing
(200 °C)
F-PP-10H10
F-PP-20H20
F-PP-30H30
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mun, J.; Kim, D.; Kang, S.; Lee, H. Mechanical Characteristics Based on the Microstructure Analysis of Cementitious Composites Incorporating Polypropylene Powder. Buildings 2025, 15, 4257. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234257

AMA Style

Mun J, Kim D, Kang S, Lee H. Mechanical Characteristics Based on the Microstructure Analysis of Cementitious Composites Incorporating Polypropylene Powder. Buildings. 2025; 15(23):4257. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234257

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mun, Jeonguk, Dongwook Kim, Sunho Kang, and Heeyoung Lee. 2025. "Mechanical Characteristics Based on the Microstructure Analysis of Cementitious Composites Incorporating Polypropylene Powder" Buildings 15, no. 23: 4257. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234257

APA Style

Mun, J., Kim, D., Kang, S., & Lee, H. (2025). Mechanical Characteristics Based on the Microstructure Analysis of Cementitious Composites Incorporating Polypropylene Powder. Buildings, 15(23), 4257. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234257

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop