Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Systematic Review Efficiency with AIGC: Applications of Perception Data in Built Environment Audits
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Design Method for Narrow Coal Pillars in Gateway Protection: Framework and Field Case Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Upcycling Strategies for Resilience Reconstruction Goals: A Case Study of an Italian Public Building

Department of Architecture and Design, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Flaminia 359, 00196 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(20), 3683; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203683 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 September 2025 / Revised: 27 September 2025 / Accepted: 4 October 2025 / Published: 13 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Building Energy, Physics, Environment, and Systems)

Abstract

This study examines the economic and financial implications of the upcycling process and Design for Disassembly (DfD) applied to an “authorial” building. The objective is to examine the economic benefits deriving from the reuse of construction materials by quantifying the savings obtained through the reduction of disposal costs and CO2 emissions in comparison with a traditional linear economic model. The methodological approach has been developed with the aid of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in order to provide an accurate estimation of both costs and environmental impacts related to the disassembly and reuse of materials. The financial analysis is based on local market prices to assess the savings associated with the reuse of building components compared to their disposal in landfills. The case study demonstrates the feasibility of this approach under real conditions, underscoring the transformative potential of upcycling in the construction industry, highlighting how this strategy can simultaneously improve economic efficiency and reduce environmental impact. The research offers a significant contribution to the debate on sustainable building practices and may serve as a starting point for future investigations.
Keywords: circular economy; upcycling; avoided costs; financial analysis; economic analysis circular economy; upcycling; avoided costs; financial analysis; economic analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tajani, F.; Bologna, A.; Cerullo, G.; Doko, E.; Sica, F. Upcycling Strategies for Resilience Reconstruction Goals: A Case Study of an Italian Public Building. Buildings 2025, 15, 3683. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203683

AMA Style

Tajani F, Bologna A, Cerullo G, Doko E, Sica F. Upcycling Strategies for Resilience Reconstruction Goals: A Case Study of an Italian Public Building. Buildings. 2025; 15(20):3683. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203683

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tajani, Francesco, Alberto Bologna, Giuseppe Cerullo, Endriol Doko, and Francesco Sica. 2025. "Upcycling Strategies for Resilience Reconstruction Goals: A Case Study of an Italian Public Building" Buildings 15, no. 20: 3683. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203683

APA Style

Tajani, F., Bologna, A., Cerullo, G., Doko, E., & Sica, F. (2025). Upcycling Strategies for Resilience Reconstruction Goals: A Case Study of an Italian Public Building. Buildings, 15(20), 3683. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203683

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop